Obamateurism of the Day
posted at 8:05 am on December 8, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Sometimes, this column simply writes itself. The White House decided to celebrate Barack Obama’s commitment to openness and transparency. How did they celebrate? By holding a meeting that was closed to the press and the public:
It’s hardly the image of transparency the Obama administration wants to project: A workshop on government openness is closed to the public.
That gave the Associated Press an opening to skewer the difference between Obama’s rhetoric and his performance on transparency:
The event Monday for federal employees is a fitting symbol of President Barack Obama’s uneven record so far on the Freedom of Information Act, a big part of keeping his campaign promise to make his administration the most transparent ever. As Obama’s first year in office ends, the government’s actions when the public and press seek information are not yet matching up with the president’s words. …
Yet on some important issues, his administration produced information only after government watchdogs and reporters spent weeks or months pressing, in some cases suing.
Those include what cars people were buying using the $3 billion Cash for Clunkers program (it turned out the most frequent trades involved pickups for pickups with only slightly better gas mileage); how many times airplanes have collided with birds (a lot); whether lobbyists and donors meet with the Obama White House (they do); rules about the interrogation of terror suspects (the FBI and CIA disagreed over what was permitted); and who was speaking in private with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner (he has close relationships with a cadre of Wall Street executives whose multibillion-dollar companies survived the economic crisis with his help).
The administration has refused to turn over important records. Obama signed a law that let the Pentagon refuse to release photographs showing U.S. troops abusing detainees, and Defense Secretary Robert Gates then did so. The Obama administration, like the Bush administration before it, has refused to release details about the CIA’s “black site” rendition program. The Federal Aviation Administration wouldn’t turn over letters and e-mails among FAA officials about reporters’ efforts to learn more about planes that crash into birds.
Just last week, a State Department deputy assistant secretary, Llewellyn Hedgbeth, said at a public conference that “as much as we want to promote transparency,” her agency will work just as hard to protect classified materials or information that would put the United States in a bad light.
People who routinely request government records said they don’t see much progress on Obama’s transparency pledge.
Maybe they would — if they could get a look at that transparency workshop.

Got an Obamateurism of the Day? If you see a foul-up by Barack Obama, e-mail it to me at obamaisms@edmorrissey.com with the quote and the link to the Obamateurism. I’ll post the best Obamateurisms on a daily basis, depending on how many I receive. Include a link to your blog, and I’ll give some link love as well. And unlike Slate, I promise to end the feature when Barack Obama leaves office.
Illustrations by Chris Muir of Day by Day. Be sure to read the adventures of Sam, Zed, Damon, and Jan every day!









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
You just can’t make this stuff up. A meeting held by con artists for con artists.
kingsjester on December 8, 2009 at 8:09 AM
Just as BHO kept his commitment to public funding of his campaign, so will he keep his commitment to openness. These issues are just too important!
mankai on December 8, 2009 at 8:10 AM
At what point in this administration, does one become a professional at being “amateur”?
an oxymoron, but a moron nonetheless.
ted c on December 8, 2009 at 8:10 AM
even the AP couldn’t cover dear leader on this little faux pas…now if only the rest of the msm would call him on this one
cmsinaz on December 8, 2009 at 8:10 AM
Its just page one from the Clinton Book on Getting Elected. Say whatever it will take to get in the White House, then do the opposite.
jbh45 on December 8, 2009 at 8:11 AM
Orwellean, as usual.
Disturb the Universe on December 8, 2009 at 8:16 AM
But Obama is transparent. I can see right through him.
backwoods conservative on December 8, 2009 at 8:17 AM
Transparency must mean like a two-way mirror.
JetBoy on December 8, 2009 at 8:19 AM
ha, backwoods, that’s a good one.
kelley in virginia on December 8, 2009 at 8:19 AM
There is not enough ink (or broadband width!) for that.
singlemalt_18 on December 8, 2009 at 8:19 AM
ditto
cmsinaz on December 8, 2009 at 8:20 AM
Thankfully, Ogabe has stuck to his 2007 belief that time-lines in a war are a bad idea.
Bishop on December 8, 2009 at 8:20 AM
Transparent as mud.
milwife88 on December 8, 2009 at 8:29 AM
Isn’t this what transparency is all about? You air the bad laundry as well as the good. The citizens have the right to see it all, as long as it isn’t classified, the good, the bad, and the ugly.
I know, I know, we are just to ignorant to understand.
If I didn’t know better, I would think 1984 came a little late.
donh525 on December 8, 2009 at 8:29 AM
A meeting about transparency held secretly? What next, a global warming nut getting rich off his own proselytizing and personally ignoring strict rules and regulations he applies to others?
MaiDee on December 8, 2009 at 8:29 AM
The Democrat’s “Culture of Corruption” does its best work under cover of darkness and behind closed doors…then they scream that Republicans are obstructionists.
Barb Dwyer on December 8, 2009 at 8:37 AM
I think they wanted Gibbs kept in the dark; It’s where he functions best, like a mushroom.
Cybergeezer on December 8, 2009 at 8:38 AM
If the media would show some integrity, politicians like Obama, Reid, Pelosi, and others (dem and rep alike) would clean up their acts to an acceptable level.
Obama isn’t transparent because he figured out during the campaign that the media will fawn all over him because they are in love with not simply reporting the events of our day. They have a sick need to report historic events and will manipulate their craft to make sure that Obama’s entire presidency is historic.
Can you imagine how ridiculous they will be viewed by history when Obama’s facade of Greek columns they have bought into is razed?
I lament the day that freedom of the press became the propaganda arm of government. Exactly what is the difference between what our founding fathers fought against and what many citizens are demanding from the government today?
csdeven on December 8, 2009 at 8:40 AM
It’s funny watching the press get on Obama for not being leftist and destructive enough. Could you imagine the type of leader they would get 100% behind?
LibTired on December 8, 2009 at 8:43 AM
Good one, JetBoy.
ladyingray on December 8, 2009 at 8:45 AM
The TOTUS is pretty transparent!
Shy Guy on December 8, 2009 at 8:45 AM
You know, talking about transparency, I would love to see his school records too. Oh and all that stuff he published as the President of the harvard Law Review, etc. This guy is about as transparent as mud.
Johnnyreb on December 8, 2009 at 8:50 AM
The funniest part is the administration’s plan to create an office specifically for helping the public with FOIA requests. That’s right, they’re adding another layer of bureaucracy to the process. I’m sure that’ll fix everything!
Tonus on December 8, 2009 at 8:54 AM
I hate to admit I agree with Bill Maher, but people are stupid. They let themselves be conned into putting this marxist America-hater in the White House with all his traitorous cronies.
Shame on you people. There is time for redemption, but that time is getting short.
Kill the bills. Kill ALL the bills.
ornery_independent on December 8, 2009 at 8:54 AM
Perhaps the AP could look into whether or not “Cash for Clunkers” was really “Send Steel to China”. (Fast forward to 13 minutes)
txhsmom on December 8, 2009 at 8:55 AM
I still want to see his birth cert.
davidk on December 8, 2009 at 8:59 AM
If you are a radical socialist like the filthy lying coward and can’t get the AP on your side, you’ve really “messed” up. I saw a quote from defending the closed-door policy as this being nothing more than a training session for the regime’s FOIA officers to better understand the process and how to “negotiate” (the administration’s word) with those requesting information.
My thought is simply this- It is not the filthy lying coward’s information to hide from the public. That information belongs to the people and he and his corrupt band of street thugs need to defend their actions in the public arena. If they can’t do that, then they must be doing something illegal, immoral, or questionable behind the scenes. It really is that simple.
highhopes on December 8, 2009 at 9:02 AM
Speaking of transparency, how about we see all the data and calculations on climate change, that brought our government to the conclusion that we need to destroy our present culture.
We should demand it and demand a halt to any climate change legislation until we see it.
donh525 on December 8, 2009 at 9:03 AM
Lying liars who lie and the lies they lie.
Mojave Mark on December 8, 2009 at 9:15 AM
It never was about the numbers. Global warming was merely a convenient excuse for radical socialism and curtailing individual freedom. The drafters of that legislation were never honest brokers and knew that GW was merely a front for an ulterior agenda. GW has made Gore into a billionaire, furthered the Dems march toward Soviet-style socialism, and has made you and I less able to live in a world where government isn’t dictating our every purchase, action, and behavior. Sadly, it is almost too late with madates for crappy cars, twisty lightbulbs (really mini-love canal’s in a socket), and other laws that were passed in the name of GW no matter what the reality is.
highhopes on December 8, 2009 at 9:15 AM
Now you know why Jessee Jackson wanted to rip his nuts out don’t you?
bluegrass on December 8, 2009 at 9:16 AM
And we are supposed to trust these secretive thugs with our health care, and the regulation of all use of fossil fuels?
rockmom on December 8, 2009 at 9:24 AM
He was actually for transparency before he was against it.
Trusser13 on December 8, 2009 at 9:27 AM
I’m still waiting for the headline that the Obama administration had a meeting on peace negotiations by blowing themselves up.
Daggett on December 8, 2009 at 9:34 AM
I agree with every thing you say.
I look at it this way. We may be driving smaller cars and using hazardous waste for light bulbs but, if we can gain the info on this scam,and somehow get it disseminated to the American public (no easy job, that) this whole magical mystery tour can be stopped.
The future: Al Gore disgraced and in jail along with those who helped him perpetrate this scam.
Drilling for gas and oil in America going full bore and capitalism alive and well.
God Bless an energy independent America and screw the Arabs!
donh525 on December 8, 2009 at 9:37 AM
What a dingus!
mizflame98 on December 8, 2009 at 9:41 AM
How is his record “uneven”? He’s been consistently secretive.
Jim Treacher on December 8, 2009 at 9:41 AM
We can’t even find his record!
donh525 on December 8, 2009 at 9:52 AM
I think I am getting numb to all the bungling and foolishness…I read these things and I just say, “It’s another day in Obama land”.
If someone wrote that he had a three way with Tiger and Bill Clinton, I would probably just shrug shoulders and say “It’s another day in Obama land”…
right2bright on December 8, 2009 at 10:09 AM
It has become apparent that the only question of Obama-nations’s birth certificate is whether he should be charged with treason, or espionage.
darktood on December 8, 2009 at 10:29 AM
It’s Peer Review in action!
The Peers meet in secret, decide what’s right, and then they let us peer at it from a distance.
Rocks on December 8, 2009 at 10:58 AM
Damn, Ed, you’re gonna need to publish a bigger OOTD calendar. Maybe two OOTD’s for each page and an OOTW on Sunday.
SKYFOX on December 8, 2009 at 10:58 AM
Thread winner!
Buford Gooch on December 8, 2009 at 1:45 PM
Legacy of Obama presidency, along with his thin skin, bowing to potentates and and his complete emptiness of the head. It’s sad for all blacks that the worst of all presidents will be their first one. His impact on racism will be a negative one for generations. One good thing. No president will be elected for his/her color, in the next 100 years. Been here, done, over. It sucks.
However, it’s hard for the media to lament from inside Obama’s trousers.
Schadenfreude on December 8, 2009 at 1:53 PM
FIFY Llewellyn
TruthToBeTold on December 8, 2009 at 2:22 PM
The Opacity of Hope…
karl9000 on December 8, 2009 at 5:26 PM