Audio: Palin hinting at 3rd-party run?

posted at 11:53 am on December 8, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

Allahpundit has this in the headlines, and it’s worth having the audio up here to catch the heavy qualifications Sarah Palin gives Lars Larson in this radio interview from last week. Larson asks whether she’d be willing to launch an independent run for the presidency if Palin was dissatisfied with the GOP, and while she didn’t say no, the conditions she lays down to remain within the Republican Party seem rather easy to meet (via The Right Scoop):

LARSON: Governor, I know you’ve successfully dodged the question on a thousand interviews on whether or not you’re going to run, but if run again, for something, whatever it is, would you run as a third-party candidate?

PALIN: That depends on how things go in the next couple of years.

LARSON: That sounds like a yes.

PALIN: Well, you know, it really does depend on — I think there are enough Republicans who are realizing, ‘Oh, whoops, some of those liberal Republicans have screwed up’ — I’m not including myself in that group — enough liberal Republicans have screwed up, and … the base of our party is common-sense conservatives, not obsessively partisan, but just wanting common-sense, free market principles, strong military principles to be implemented to get our country on the right track. And if the Republican Party gets back to that base, our party is going to be stronger and there’s not going to be a need for a third party. But I’ll play that by ear in the coming months, coming years.

I see this as less of a story than it seems. It helps to remember that Palin made her political bones as a reformer, an outsider to her state’s GOP. In fact, Palin scored her initial statewide success by exposing corrupt practices within her own party. Being an outsider is part of her DNA, and part of her appeal within the party.

It’s also not terribly unusual for any reformers to talk about the potential of running outside of the establishment. Ron Paul’s supporters practically formed their own third party without Paul himself in the last election cycle, and still remain a potent political force. They overlap on some of what Palin mentions in this interview, with the obvious exception of military/foreign policy.

The GOP will have to return to its “common sense, free market principles” if it wants to win in 2010. In fact, they’ll need to focus almost exclusively on those in order to win a wide, governing mandate in the midterms. All Palin is doing is reminding the GOP that they can’t take generic unhappiness with the current Congress and administration for granted and just offer business as usual — and that’s helpful indeed.

Update: I missed a “not” in that transcript, which I’ve fixed.  Thanks to Philip J for the correction.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Sometimes I feel like Palin will agree with any premise that is posed to her by a friendly interviewer.

lorien1973 on December 8, 2009 at 11:54 AM

The question isn’t about President. It would include if she ran for the house seat or the Senates seats in Alaska. Where she’s never run from within the party.

Such a non-starter.

Spirit of 1776 on December 8, 2009 at 11:55 AM

Spot on, Ed.

SouthernGent on December 8, 2009 at 11:56 AM

a third party run would be dumb, and Palin isn’t dumb.

Rebar on December 8, 2009 at 11:57 AM

It sounds more like Palin is just trying to keep the “Old Guard Rockefellers” shaking in their boots.

TQM38a on December 8, 2009 at 11:57 AM

All Palin is doing is reminding the GOP that they can’t take generic unhappiness with the current Congress and administration for granted and just offer business as usual — and that’s helpful indeed.

Oops, meant to quote that in my original comment, and add “I agree”

Spirit of 1776 on December 8, 2009 at 11:57 AM

I see this as less of a story than it seems.

I completely agree.

upinak on December 8, 2009 at 11:57 AM

I see this as less of a story than it seems.

Allahpundit would NEVER read more into something, and post about it causing 1000 comments. NEVER.

portlandon on December 8, 2009 at 11:57 AM

It is also a way to get the media to back off. They would love her if she did that.

tomas on December 8, 2009 at 11:58 AM

Seems like an empty rhetorical threat. “Hey GOP shape up or I’m out.”

Yeah right.

The Calibur on December 8, 2009 at 11:59 AM

Great post and analysis Ed.

davek70 on December 8, 2009 at 11:59 AM

Sarah Palin isn’t known for “hinting.”

She pretty much says exactly what she means, and she did so, again, here.

notropis on December 8, 2009 at 12:00 PM

All Palin is doing is reminding the GOP that they can’t take generic unhappiness with the current Congress and administration for granted and just offer business as usual — and that’s helpful indeed.

bingo

james23 on December 8, 2009 at 12:01 PM

All Palin is doing is reminding the GOP that they can’t take generic unhappiness with the current Congress and administration for granted and just offer business as usual — and that’s helpful indeed.

Agreed. Great synopsis, Ed.

bluelightbrigade on December 8, 2009 at 12:03 PM

You’re right, Ed. The question is will the GOP try to re-connect with the American People? Or will they remain isolated up in the Beltway?

kingsjester on December 8, 2009 at 12:03 PM

Is this book tour going to end ever? I would rather 2010 candidates get publicity than the umpteen “Sarah Palin says something” post. We can’t just cruise because the Obamessiah seems to be losing his true believers.

Speedwagon82 on December 8, 2009 at 12:03 PM

CORRECTION REQUIRED<<<

PALIN: Well, you know, it really does depend on — I think there are enough Republicans who are realizing, ‘Oh, whoops, some of those liberal Republicans have screwed up’ — I’m NOT including myself in that group — enough liberal Republicans have screwed up, and … the base of our party is common-sense conservatives, not obsessively partisan, but just wanting

PhilipJames on December 8, 2009 at 12:03 PM

I like her, I admire her courage and “rogueishness.” I don’t like her for president. Sorry.

scalleywag on December 8, 2009 at 12:04 PM

Finally, another Palin thread.

WordsMatter on December 8, 2009 at 12:04 PM

Non-story.

tickleddragon on December 8, 2009 at 12:05 PM

This is a non-issue. All she’s saying is the GOP better be more like Doug Hoffman and less like Dede Scuzzy-fever and she’ll proudly carry their torch. Who among us fiscal conservatives ISN’T saying that?

Doughboy on December 8, 2009 at 12:05 PM

Aren’t all conservatives thinking the same thing?.. If the Republican party doesn’t get back to “common-sense, free market principles, strong military principles” we will leave.

roux on December 8, 2009 at 12:06 PM

The GOP will have to return to its “common sense, free market principles” if it wants to win in 2010. In fact, they’ll need to focus almost exclusively on those in order to win a wide, governing mandate in the midterms. All Palin is doing is reminding the GOP that they can’t take generic unhappiness with the current Congress and administration for granted and just offer business as usual — and that’s helpful indeed.

Precisely.

I’ve made the comment before, and will repeat it here, that IMO the GOP needs to outline a clear platform and draw voters to conservative principles rather than blurring the lines between them and the DNC chasing after “moderate” voters, alienating their base in the process.

See McCain, John as a warning example.

cs89 on December 8, 2009 at 12:06 PM

The fact that Sarah Palin is about the ONLY member of the GOP showing any kind of national level leadership at the moment is a sad comment indeed. That’s why the book tour comments won’t end.

Come on, GOP; man up! At least to Sarah’s level.

michaelo on December 8, 2009 at 12:06 PM

It’s also not terribly unusual for any reformers to talk about the potential of running outside of the establishment. Ron Paul’s supporters practically formed their own third party without Paul himself in the last election cycle, and still remain a potent political force.

Ouch. That doesn’t say much for Palin’s supporters. I prefer to think that she has more gravitas than Paul.

Buy Danish on December 8, 2009 at 12:07 PM

Let the Democrats do the third party thing and lets help Sarah get the Republicans back on track.

fourdeucer on December 8, 2009 at 12:08 PM

Sometimes I feel like Palin will agree with any premise that is posed to her by a friendly interviewer.

lorien1973 on December 8, 2009 at 11:54 AM

I agree.

WashJeff on December 8, 2009 at 12:08 PM

I see this as less of a story than it seems.

Oooh, careful Ed. AP said the other day he was thinking of banning people who take the time to comment that they’re not interested in a topic/story he posts. ;)

DrAllecon on December 8, 2009 at 12:09 PM

A non-story, and a perfectly reasonable comment. If it’s taken as a shot across the bow to the GOP, good, and that was probably her intention

rrpjr on December 8, 2009 at 12:10 PM

I like her, I admire her courage and “rogueishness.” I don’t like her for president. Sorry.

scalleywag on December 8, 2009 at 12:04 PM

I agree.

txag92 on December 8, 2009 at 12:10 PM

lorien1973 on December 8, 2009 at 11:54 AM

I get that too. The only answer to this question is an unequivocal no.

Jeff M (Formerly Jeff_McAwesome) on December 8, 2009 at 12:11 PM

Is this book tour going to end ever? I would rather 2010 candidates get publicity than the umpteen “Sarah Palin says something” post. We can’t just cruise because the Obamessiah seems to be losing his true believers.

Speedwagon82 on December 8, 2009 at 12:03 PM

Chill out dude. Scheduled to end by end of the week. BTW, it’s not her fault the media keeps giving her attention and writing stories about things that are a week old.

davek70 on December 8, 2009 at 12:11 PM

I get that too. The only answer to this question is an unequivocal no.

Jeff M (Formerly Jeff_McAwesome) on December 8, 2009 at 12:11 PM

Wrong. There are other answers, one of which Palin gave.
I happen to agree with Ed, that this is useful to remind the DCGOP they have to earn back voters trust and enthusiasm, not just sit around and wait for the Democrats to implode.

Palin can bring the TeaParty movement into the GOP, if the GOP would help her out by being more consistently conservative.

Brian1972 on December 8, 2009 at 12:16 PM

My money’s on Palin, indie run or not.

madmonkphotog on December 8, 2009 at 12:17 PM

This is Sarah’s way of turning up the heat on the GOP to stay right of center and ignore Lindsey Graham and the Maine sisters.

By the way, I’m snowed in Russell, KS, Bob Dole country. The storm has kept me bottled up in a hotel and my car is stuck in a restaurant parking lot til the lot gets plowed. I’m not gonna make it to the Cuda’s book signing in Colorado Springs. I might try to link up in CA later in Dec. if she’s out there.

Also, if Rick Santorum thinks he can beat the Cuda, he is a heavy drug user.

Sapwolf on December 8, 2009 at 12:17 PM

Rush Limbaugh asked her about this in their recent interview:

RUSH: All right, independents, slash, third party. A lot of people — mistakenly, in my view — are looking at New York-23 as evidence that, see, a third party could actually do well. But that’s not a good example because there was no primary there. As you said, the party bosses chose Dede Scozzafava on the Republican side and a Democrat. Had there been a primary, New York-23 would not have been constituted as it was. So what are your thoughts now on the viability of a third party if the Republican Party can’t be brought around?

GOV. PALIN: You know, to be brutally honest, I think that it’s a bit naive when you talk about the pragmatism that has to be applied in America’s political system. And we are a two-party system. Ideally, sure, a third party or an independent party would be able to soar and thrive and put candidates forth and have them elected, but I don’t think America is ready for that. I think that it is… Granted it’s quite conventional and traditional, but in a good way that we have our two parties, and I think that that’s what will remain. And I say that, though, acknowledging that I’m not an obsessive panther, I understand why people — good people like my own husband — refuse to register in a party. Todd’s not a Republican and yet he’s got more commonsense conservatism than a whole lot of Republicans that I know because he is one who sees the idiosyncrasies of the characters within the machine and it frustrates him along with a whole lot of other Americans who choose to be independent. But in answer to your question, I don’t think that the third party movement will be what’s necessary to usher in some commonsense conservative ideals.

CP on December 8, 2009 at 12:18 PM

I like your take on it ED, as a reminder for the party to get with it.

therightscoop on December 8, 2009 at 12:24 PM

s. palin would never go 3rd party route, she’s too smart and knows that is a recipe for disaster

this was just a warning across the bow from her to the gop to get their act together. thats all this is.

sidewinder22 on December 8, 2009 at 12:25 PM

That may be what it takes to get the GOP to leave their stick in the mud syndrome and institute some real passion for conservatism.

Speakup on December 8, 2009 at 12:30 PM

I like her, I admire her courage and “rogueishness.” I don’t like her for president. Sorry.

scalleywag on December 8, 2009 at 12:04 PM

I agree.

txag92 on December 8, 2009 at 12:10 PM

Who do you like then? Who would make a better President than Palin?

Guardian on December 8, 2009 at 12:31 PM

Palin went from an intriguing political figure to a McCain groupie in short order. Also how can Palin be anti-establishment when she is now the favorite candidate of the National Review, Karl Rove, Newt Gingrich, etc. I heard that she was Kristol’s hand-picked VP choice.

The Dean on December 8, 2009 at 12:31 PM

The fact that Sarah Palin is about the ONLY member of the GOP showing any kind of national level leadership at the moment is a sad comment indeed. That’s why the book tour comments won’t end.

Come on, GOP; man up! At least to Sarah’s level.

michaelo on December 8, 2009 at 12:06 PM

There’s got to be someone out there, a scholar, a fellow, a former CEO, a former general, someone with impeccable credentials who can represent the GOP? Please, come out wherever you are. We need a real leader. We desperately need a real leader. Palin isn’t it, and time is running out.

scalleywag on December 8, 2009 at 12:33 PM

She’s said nothing here that’s very different than what Reagan said on the same subject over the years.

TXUS on December 8, 2009 at 12:33 PM

The base have been begging and screaming at our elected officials to man up but they don’t listen. I have had “my friend” and “the honorable member” up to my eyeballs. The Republicans have no one to blame but themselves for the public perception that they have nothing to offer but impediments. Their ideas and differences should be so forceful and loud that they cannot be ignored. Milktoast, that’s what we have. And that’s the “conservatives”.

Cindy Munford on December 8, 2009 at 12:35 PM

I really think that Sarah Palin would be more effective in Congress. It is an opportunity for her to actually represent the people and work for the people. I do believe that she would be able to influence other congress critters to start honoring the constitution and working on behalf of the people. She has no problem calling out those who stray from their elected duties and would be the strong arm the Repubs need to stand united against the crap the is coming out of Washington today.
My biggest fear is the Repubs regain control of Congress and pi$$ it away. I really think she would stop that from happening and if it did, “Nelly bar the door” you will be called on the carpet.

milwife88 on December 8, 2009 at 12:36 PM

Who do you like then? Who would make a better President than Palin?

Guardian on December 8, 2009 at 12:31 PM

That’s the problem…I don’t know. We don’t have anyone else stepping up to the plate.

scalleywag on December 8, 2009 at 12:36 PM

the base of our party is common-sense conservatives, not obsessively partisan, but just wanting common-sense, free market principles, strong military principles to be implemented to get our country on the right track.–Palin

the conditions she lays down to remain within the Republican Party seem rather easy to meet.–Ed

COMMON SENSE (twice over) may “SEEM rather easy to meet” but in reality is hardly the easiest thing to accomplish, particularly in politics.

Fred Thompson reminded the Republican Party or our first principles platform loyal to our Constitution, using the common sense that he teases now as so uncommon. Sarah Palin is doing well to vitalize that same conservative constituency of Americans who admire Fred Thompson’s wisdom. If Thompson and Palin were to unite, the two would make a complete conservative political force balanced by the yin/yang factors that each contribute into the amalgam of energized and wise Constitutional power.

Common Sense dictates fiscal conservancy to deprive the federal government of further pork that is driving us to our premature grave (along with aborted innocent lives and the termination of our elderly). This while the Radical Federal powers rescind Constitutional Rights from citizens in order to illegitimately squander those on illegal aliens with no allegiance to the USA and terrorists with allegiance to radical Islam committed to the complete destruction of the USA, an ideology that our current potus empowers.

There’s nothing EASY about abolishing PC given the federal powers that enforce it. And it will take the organization of those with common sense to pierce the PC beast’s armor. And as Fred’s question points out, it evidently takes an uncommon person to lead the common sense movement, because everyone else falls in line with the power of the invested populists who enforce PC in order to protect their own personal special interests, beginning with social status.

We witness now the same power play by the feudal global order trying its best to coerce everyone into obeying fraud and the dogmas, strategy and tactics of false science to rule the world of serfs, unencumbered by any rule of law, much less the US Constitution.

maverick muse on December 8, 2009 at 12:36 PM

She just said that so bloggers could make some money.

a capella on December 8, 2009 at 12:37 PM

There’s got to be someone out there, a scholar, a fellow, a former CEO, a former general, someone with impeccable credentials who can represent the GOP? Please, come out wherever you are. We need a real leader. We desperately need a real leader. Palin isn’t it, and time is running out.

scalleywag on December 8, 2009 at 12:33 PM

You sound concerned…

kbfntc on December 8, 2009 at 12:37 PM

That’s the problem…I don’t know. We don’t have anyone else stepping up to the plate.

scalleywag on December 8, 2009 at 12:36 PM

I really like Allen West of Florida.

upinak on December 8, 2009 at 12:38 PM

Who do you like then? Who would make a better President than Palin?

Guardian on December 8, 2009 at 12:31 PM

That’s the problem…I don’t know. We don’t have anyone else stepping up to the plate.

scalleywag on December 8, 2009 at 12:36 PM

Scalley, a leader is by definition, one who leads. Palin is a leader. She’s not doing any following.

jimmy2shoes on December 8, 2009 at 12:38 PM

I really like Allen West of Florida.

upinak on December 8, 2009 at 12:38 PM

Absolutely.

jimmy2shoes on December 8, 2009 at 12:39 PM

My biggest fear is the Repubs regain control of Congress and pi$$ it away.
milwife88 on December 8, 2009 at 12:36 PM

100% with you there…they’ll be democrat-lite

cmsinaz on December 8, 2009 at 12:39 PM

Sarah and Rick Perry don’t need the Republicans. People are just as sick of the Republicans as they are of the Messiah and his minions. I don’t care if Sarah and Rick Perry start the Mickey Mouse 3rd Party – they’ll win. People WANT change – real change. And they grabbed their collective ankles once with The One. They aren’t going to do it again for RomneyCARE or “Let all Rapists Go” Huck. Sarah is where people are looking – and I feel the Republican “brand” will simply diminish her. Will a 3rd party cause the Messiah to win? Give me a break………….besides racist blacks who vote only for skin color……….and Nancy “Nazi” Polousey – who in their right mind would vote for The Messiah?

Cinday Blackburn on December 8, 2009 at 12:41 PM

Let’s hope she does not run on a third party ticket, because if she does I fear that Obama will win. And I don’t much like that idea.

Terrye on December 8, 2009 at 12:42 PM

Cinday:

No, people are not just as sick of the Republicans as they are the Democrats. If someone runs third party, Democrats win. It is just the way it is.

Terrye on December 8, 2009 at 12:43 PM

My biggest fear is the Repubs regain control of Congress and pi$$ it away.
milwife88 on December 8, 2009 at 12:36 PM

100% with you there…they’ll be democrat-lite

cmsinaz on December 8, 2009 at 12:39 PM

My biggest fear is that they won’t win and the Democrats will continue the job they started of dismantling the economy. The Republicans may not be perfect, but they did not do or even seriously consider doing half the bone head stuff that the trifecta of Obama/Reid and Pelosi do on a daily freaking basis.

And if people can not see that, then we really are lost. My greatest fear is that conservatives will p*ss away any realistic chance they have of stopping the Obama administration by fighting among themselves.

Terrye on December 8, 2009 at 12:46 PM

Milktoast, that’s what we have. And that’s the “conservatives”.
Cindy Munford on December 8, 2009 at 12:35 PM

I think that’s a bit unfair. They’ve been out there, making a lot of sense, but the media doesn’t cover what they say.

Buy Danish on December 8, 2009 at 12:47 PM

And Cinday, Sarah Palin is a Republican.

Terrye on December 8, 2009 at 12:47 PM

I am concerned. We need a strong contender that no one has any doubt would be a great president for years to come, and will vote for him in droves. Someone who has the knowledge and experience to put the nation back on the right track and doesn’t need 800 czars to help him do it. Someone who knows darn good and well what’s good for our country and has a Patton like approach towards getting it done. Someone who commands respect…and gets it. Someone who, when he walks int a room the people will bow to. Kidding. Are those just wild expectations? Why can’t we find someone like that? A man with character and no corruption in his background. A man with morals and convictions and principles. It doesn’t even have to be a man, but it has to be someone who doesn’t have a facebook account and doesn’t want to be on the cover of People magazine or appear on Letterman.

scalleywag on December 8, 2009 at 12:48 PM

a third party run would be dumb, and Palin isn’t dumb.

Rebar on December 8, 2009 at 11:57 AM

What’s dumb is allowing yourself to be held hostage by the two party system, which has failed the people and the republic miserably. It’s political Stockholm Syndrome, is what.

The Republicrats had their run, and brought this country to its knees. It’s well past time to run our corrupt ruling class all out of town on a rail, and see both major parties go the way of the Whigs.

Rae on December 8, 2009 at 12:52 PM

While Sarah Palin is indeed “rogue”, she is not dumb. She knows a third party run is DOA.I read her book and didn’t come away with the feeling that she would make a third party run. Just my opinion though.

sandee on December 8, 2009 at 12:52 PM

What has drawn me to Sarah is that I don’t have to read between the lines. She says what she means and means what she says.

dragondrop on December 8, 2009 at 12:52 PM

scalleywag on December 8, 2009 at 12:48 PM

Okay so how about you look up Retired Lt Col Allen West and then tell me what you think.

Hmmmm?

upinak on December 8, 2009 at 12:53 PM

There’s got to be someone out there, a scholar, a fellow, a former CEO, a former general, someone with impeccable credentials who can represent the GOP? Please, come out wherever you are. We need a real leader. We desperately need a real leader. Palin isn’t it, and time is running out.

scalleywag on December 8, 2009 at 12:33 PM

Doesn’t the fact that they are not stepping forward demonstrate that they are not leaders?

Lou Budvis on December 8, 2009 at 12:53 PM

Cinday:

No, people are not just as sick of the Republicans as they are the Democrats. If someone runs third party, Democrats win. It is just the way it is.

Terrye on December 8, 2009 at 12:43 PM

What are you talking about? In a three way split the Republicans get the least votes! What the hell is up with the GOP marketers?

True_King on December 8, 2009 at 12:53 PM

Terrye on December 8, 2009 at 12:46 PM

understood, however, whenever the (R)s are in control, they never fight, they rather play nice with the (D)s and be pals…no gumption

cmsinaz on December 8, 2009 at 12:54 PM

and I feel the Republican “brand” will simply diminish her. Cinday Blackburn on December 8, 2009 at 12:41 PM

You can’t believe in Palin and also believe this. We’re dealing here with an authentic leader: it is she who will re-brand the party. She understands perfectly well her challenges, and her practical possibilities only as a Republican; she has no intention to run in a third-party. A true leader recognizes the value — moral and realistic — of what is, and finds ways to make it better. He or she doesn’t efface what is in the name of a futile and grandiose statement.

rrpjr on December 8, 2009 at 12:54 PM

Okay, Okay I get it about the Republicans losing in a three way race. That being said once the true race is on I can’t see Conservatives voting third party or staying home this time. I believe that any Republican is going to be better than another term for Obama. I trust Conservatives will feel that way to when it comes down to the actual vote.

sandee on December 8, 2009 at 12:56 PM

lorien1973 on December 8, 2009 at 11:54 AM

And this is a problem? I mean, think about it folks: If the Republican Party is so shame-inducing, why would someone like Sarah Palin sully her brand image by being associated with them? The GOP is NOT entitled to her, folks. She can get along without them.

BradSchwartze on December 8, 2009 at 12:56 PM

Are the Republicans paying attention? Or do they think they can proceed business as usual?

Dr Evil on December 8, 2009 at 12:58 PM

Finally, another Palin thread.

WordsMatter on December 8, 2009 at 12:04 PM

Heh.

Anyway, yeh well done Ed. That’s exactly what she’s saying. ‘Get your s**t together GOP so I don’t have to get it together for you’.

For me, that is exactly how I interpret the Tea Party message altogether. Perhaps not entirely, I acknowledge that, but the overriding theme that I’ve discerned from being in D.C. and watching the movement unfold is that it’s high time for the GOP to get their act together and return for first principles.

Sarah can go a long way toward seeing that happen.

russcote on December 8, 2009 at 12:59 PM

You know who’s going to end up third party and the fly in the oinment? Mike Huckabee, that’s who’s going to end up third party.

Marcus on December 8, 2009 at 1:00 PM

Buy Danish on December 8, 2009 at 12:47 PM

I would be more impressed with their leadshipd skills if they demanded to be heard. W never stood up for the good things he did and for that he gets to be responsible for every bad thing happening in the world today. Fair, is not part of the current equation. I am sure they are trying but they need to think outside of the box and get the message out there. Doing the same thing, getting the same results and then being surprised by it is lame.

Cindy Munford on December 8, 2009 at 1:01 PM

If someone runs third party, Democrats win. It is just the way it is.

Terrye on December 8, 2009 at 12:43 PM

It’s the Republican Party that is fast on it’s way to 3rd party spoiler status, according to Rasmussen’s poll a day or two ago. If third parties are so bad, the Republican Party should consider giving way.

FloatingRock on December 8, 2009 at 1:02 PM

TQM38a on December 8, 2009 at 11:57 AM

How 1960s of you. “A Choice, Not An Echo!” is forever, it seems.

BradSchwartze on December 8, 2009 at 1:04 PM

PALIN: …the base of our party is common-sense conservatives, not obsessively partisan, but just wanting common-sense, free market principles, strong military principles to be implemented to get our country on the right track

Is it really any wonder why liberal Republicans and liberal Democrats hate Sarah Palin more than life itself?

logis on December 8, 2009 at 1:06 PM

Speedwagon82 on December 8, 2009 at 12:03 PM

My, you seem a little uncomfortable at a Republican conservative getting good press. Better get those crutches known as “principles” and “stick to the issues” propped up.

BradSchwartze on December 8, 2009 at 1:07 PM

michaelo on December 8, 2009 at 12:06 PM

Again, why would Sarah tarnish her brand by associating with someone as shame-inducing as the GOP?

Why are you afraid to answer this question?

BradSchwartze on December 8, 2009 at 1:08 PM

roux on December 8, 2009 at 12:06 PM

What makes you think the GOP left those principles behind? Just because someone like, say, Mike Pence doesn’t get the traffic that a Sarah Palin gets, doesn’t mean they’re cowering in the dark, plotting ways to screw America slower.

BradSchwartze on December 8, 2009 at 1:12 PM

Well, I must salute Mrs. Palin.

This is because, speaking personally, if I myself was ever treated with an equivalent level of contempt, disregard, and lack of decency by so-called allies; if I was allowed to twist in the wind till I saved myself, even if the cause of my troubles was partially (or mainly) the result of others; and if I had to continually fight to prove myself so as to not be viewed with fundamental doubts about my abilities, maturity, stability, and leadership capabilities–and if all of these came from a right-leaning establishment (both political and intellectual) who might not be able to do the same thing I could do–well then, I think it would be a very cold day somewhere before I ever marched under the same banner in common cause with those people, as I would find it irritating to my feelings.

I think my view, if I was in such a position, would very much be that since they think they have it all figured out, let them win the day–I’ll find something else to do. Assuming they could win the day; results to date not being very encouraging.

No, I’m not sure I can muster the desire to pass over that quantum barrier. And thus I salute her, because she would seem to be a better man than I.

Horatius on December 8, 2009 at 1:16 PM

Sometimes I feel like Palin will agree with any premise that is posed to her by a friendly interviewer.

lorien1973 on December 8, 2009 at 11:54 AM

Nope. She’s very consistent with this one … in words and in deeds.

That’s why dirty Republicans in Alaska also hate her.

TheAlamos on December 8, 2009 at 1:18 PM

There’s got to be someone out there, a scholar, a fellow, a former CEO, a former general, someone with impeccable credentials who can represent the GOP? Please, come out wherever you are. We need a real leader. We desperately need a real leader. Palin isn’t it, and time is running out.

scalleywag on December 8, 2009 at 12:33 PM
You sound concerned…

kbfntc on December 8, 2009 at 12:37 PM

concerned? He sounds like a unhinged loon

unseen on December 8, 2009 at 1:18 PM

No, I’m not sure I can muster the desire to pass over that quantum barrier. And thus I salute her, because she would seem to be a better man than I.

Horatius on December 8, 2009 at 1:16 PM

she understands that revenge is a dish served cold. She will get her rewards and she will make not just the dems pay but the GOP elites also. And she will not do it for sake of revenege but for the good of the country. The revenge will simply be a by product of her doing what is needed to do

unseen on December 8, 2009 at 1:21 PM

Mike Pence doesn’t get the traffic that a Sarah Palin gets, doesn’t mean they’re cowering in the dark, plotting ways to screw America slower.

BradSchwartze on December 8, 2009 at 1:12 PM

True but it also doesn’t mean they are not.

unseen on December 8, 2009 at 1:22 PM

concerned? He sounds like a unhinged loon

unseen on December 8, 2009 at 1:18 PM

haha, thanks! I’m an unhinged female tho, thank you very much.

scalleywag on December 8, 2009 at 1:23 PM

Cindy Munford on December 8, 2009 at 1:01 PM

What, exactly, would you like the likes of Mike Pence and Thad McCotter to do? C’mon now, Cindy, you’re the customer; you tell us shame-inducing Republicans what we should do.

Then again, maybe I shouldn’t ask you, since you’ll waffle your way out of supporting Mike and Thad if they get anything like the blowback Sarah Palin has received.

BradSchwartze on December 8, 2009 at 1:24 PM

roux on December 8, 2009 at 12:06 PM

What makes you think the GOP left those principles behind? Just because someone like, say, Mike Pence doesn’t get the traffic that a Sarah Palin gets, doesn’t mean they’re cowering in the dark, plotting ways to screw America slower.

BradSchwartze on December 8, 2009 at 1:12 PM

If you only try to be honest to yourself. You know what the likes of Pence are doing. They are just bystandders (not fighting enough since they are afraid of being Palinized and be declared as divisive) and waiting for the Obama/Dems to self-destruct.

That’s the main difference with Sarah Palin. She fights. I remember one politician like that not so long ago. His name was Ronald Reagan.

TheAlamos on December 8, 2009 at 1:24 PM

There is a good quote at the end of the Palin piece by Fish in the NYT concerning her book

wherein he says,

“The message is clear. America can’t be stopped. I can’t be stopped. I’ve stumbled and fallen, but I always get up and run again. Her political opponents, especially those who dismissed Ronald Reagan before he was elected, should take note. Wherever you are, you better watch out. Sarah Palin is coming to town.”

That has all the elites so frackin afraid.

OkieDoc on December 8, 2009 at 1:24 PM

Again, why would Sarah tarnish her brand by associating with someone as shame-inducing as the GOP?

Why are you afraid to answer this question?

BradSchwartze on December 8, 2009 at 1:08 PM

Palin herself has already answered this question. she believes the planks of the GOP are the best. She is not a big fan of the present leadership of tha tparty nor the direction that the party has gone but she believes that the planks of the party platform are correct ans simply needs to be followed. Like freedom,liberty, self government, smaller government, less spending, strong military, law and order party, party of life

she actually believes that people should practice what they preach.

unseen on December 8, 2009 at 1:25 PM

Okay so how about you look up Retired Lt Col Allen West and then tell me what you think.

Hmmmm?

upinak on December 8, 2009 at 12:53 PM

I’ll do that…check back in a bit.

scalleywag on December 8, 2009 at 1:26 PM

unseen on December 8, 2009 at 1:22 PM

Sooner or later, you’re going to come to the humbling admission that you believe anyone not named Sarah Palin or Rush Limbaugh is a “GOP Elite.” Then you’ll have exposed yourself for the popular culture addict that you are, and that anything you say about “issues” and “principles” will be a big smokescreen.

BradSchwartze on December 8, 2009 at 1:27 PM

russcote on December 8, 2009 at 12:59 PM

Yep. Voters are hungry for the GOP to govern in a manner consistent to how they speak on the campaign trail.

IMO, the GOP went off the rails by compromising on a wide variety of issues (fiscal restraint, rule of law, social conservatism, originalist judges) and of course massive corruption and influence peddling.

Voters said “you too? Pffft” and walked away.

cs89 on December 8, 2009 at 1:30 PM

TheAlamos on December 8, 2009 at 1:24 PM

Another person who tries to make some intellectual rationalization for his pop-culture lust for Sarah. Seriously, wipe the drool from your face; it’s embarassing.

BradSchwartze on December 8, 2009 at 1:30 PM

Sarah was pointing out that anything can happen, and the repub. old dogs better not take anything for granted. Those who want to paint her as just agreeable to anyone who is a friendly interviewer just don’t get her–that, or just pathetic trolls.

texanpride on December 8, 2009 at 1:30 PM

The GOP needs Sarah, more than Sarah needs the GOP.

All she needs is votes… What the GOP needs is leadership.

franksalterego on December 8, 2009 at 1:31 PM

I like Palin, but it seems like every time she gives an interview, someone has to tell us what it means later. I mean come on…why be so cryptic, unless you want to sound like a politician.

There are a lot of good conservatives in the Republican party. And while people like attacking Republicans, when they want to recall conservatives they like or admire, they are almost always a Republican…like Reagan or Goldwater.

Unless of course they are elites too.

Terrye on December 8, 2009 at 1:34 PM

Comment pages: 1 2