Did NPR sign up for Obama’s war on Fox?

posted at 2:00 pm on December 7, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

When Barack Obama went to war with Fox News, other media organizations eventually rebelled against the heavy-handed attacks.  The White House got the message, and began giving interviews once again to Fox, with Obama himself and Gen. David Petraeus over the last couple of weeks.  However, it looks as though one news organization attempted to wage a quiet war on Obama’s behalf with its own left flank:

Executives at National Public Radio recently asked the network’s top political correspondent, Mara Liasson, to reconsider her regular appearances on Fox News because of what they perceived as the network’s political bias, two sources familiar with the effort said.

According to a source, Liasson was summoned in early October by NPR’s executive editor for news, Dick Meyer, and the network’s supervising senior Washington editor, Ron Elving. The NPR executives said they had concerns that Fox’s programming had grown more partisan, and they asked Liasson to spend 30 days watching the network.

At a follow-up meeting last month, Liasson reported that she’d seen no significant change in Fox’s programming and planned to continue appearing on the network, the source said. …

Liasson defended her work for Fox by saying that she appears on two of the network’s news programs, not on commentary programs with conservative hosts, the source said. She has also told colleagues that she’s under contract to Fox, so it would be difficult for her to sever her ties with the network, which she has appeared on for more than a decade.

Give Mara Liasson a big cheer for reportorial independence — and some guts.  After all, when network execs tell a reporter to “reconsider” her work with another entity, that’s a big signal to cease and desist.  Liasson could have easily folded and taken the easy way out by joining a chorus of Fox critics.  Instead, she held her ground and essentially outlasted them.

But what is NPR doing by pressuring Liasson anyway?  Unless they want to offer her an exclusive contract and compensation for breaking her pact with Fox, it’s really not any of their business what she does with the rest of her time.  Besides, as a taxpayer-funded news organization, NPR also has no business getting involved in government attacks on Fox News.  They reveal themselves as the toady of the Beltway, and especially this administration, by attempting to join Obama’s war on Fox.

The choice of Liasson is no accident, either.  Her presence on Fox shows that the network welcomes liberal points of view (which no one can doubt Liasson holds), more so than some networks welcome conservatives.  The presence of Liasson and Juan Williams demonstrates a balance on its news programming and analysis (apart from the commentary shows, which Liasson rightly pointed out to NPR) that one rarely sees on MS-NBC, CBS, or at times even CNN, although the latter does employ the formidable Bill Bennett.

Liasson demonstrated what independence means.  Maybe NPR should observe Liasson more, and learn what that means.

Full disclosure: I have appeared twice on Liasson’s NPR show in the last few years.  She’s professional and represented my point of view fairly in the editing process both times.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

NPR knows who butters their bread.

portlandon on December 7, 2009 at 2:05 PM

Give Mara Liasson a big cheer for reportorial independence — and some guts

Oh, I do. I do.

BlueStateBilly on December 7, 2009 at 2:05 PM

Thank you Mara for sticking to you guns. You have guts! I do not agree with you, but you add to the Fox show.
L

letget on December 7, 2009 at 2:05 PM

Good for her! And, again, note the ironic display of these geniuses perceiving a network to be too partisan and responding to it by… trying to make it more partisan.

DaveS on December 7, 2009 at 2:06 PM

So let me get this straight.

According to NPR, Fox News is slanted. One of their supposedly non slanted people comments there. So rather than allowing their person to show by example how nutso Fox news is, rather than allowing their person to be the voice of reason possibly driving up NPR listeners in the process, NPR wants to pull their person.

Anyone else have a problem with this? Did I miss something ?

Duncan Khuver on December 7, 2009 at 2:06 PM

They reveal themselves as the toady of the Beltway, and especially this administration, by attempting to join Obama’s war on Fox.

I don’t think there’s much doubt about their toady status, but they probably shouldn’t be so flagrant about it.

forest on December 7, 2009 at 2:06 PM

George Soros’s personal steno pool – aka Media Matters – and other lefty groups have been putting pressure on NPR on this matter for awhile. It started out with Juan Williams and, having failed there, they’ve targetted Liasson.

Remember, they believe in diversity and pluralism.

Sometimes.

SteveMG on December 7, 2009 at 2:06 PM

I, as a politically, and for the most part socially, conservative soldier really enjoy paying taxes so that my duly elected and appointed betters may p**s on me. Thank goodness there’s a federally-funded soapbox (NPR) for that.

Yep, can’t get enough.

Now, if y’all will excuse me, I’m off to buy some more reloading supplies.

Doorgunner on December 7, 2009 at 2:08 PM

Good for her, but she still pales in comparison when matched against Charles Krauthammer on the panel.

SouthernGent on December 7, 2009 at 2:08 PM

Is the problem that Liasson appears on Fox or that she’s been known to take some nasty swipes at this Adminstration lately?

Knucklehead on December 7, 2009 at 2:09 PM

The presence of Liasson and Juan Williams demonstrates a balance on its news programming and analysis

Right, wasn’t Williams also targeted in the past by NPR’s moonbat fanbase?

ddrintn on December 7, 2009 at 2:09 PM

Did NPR sign up for Obama’s war on Fox?

Did they volunteer or were they drafted?

FloatingRock on December 7, 2009 at 2:09 PM

National Partisan Radio funded with our money.

txag92 on December 7, 2009 at 2:10 PM

NPR needs to get off the taxpayer’s dole…

cmsinaz on December 7, 2009 at 2:10 PM

Did NPR sign up for Obama’s war on Fox?

Yes!

Did they volunteer or were they drafted?

FloatingRock on December 7, 2009 at 2:09 PM

Yes!

Hope and Change Baby!

upinak on December 7, 2009 at 2:10 PM

txag92 on December 7, 2009 at 2:10 PM

great minds…
:-)

cmsinaz on December 7, 2009 at 2:10 PM

I’ve always considered Mara Liasson as solidly, but not rabidly, liberal. Some (not many) liberals have strength of character. Mara is one. I believe she can eventually be turned to the good side of the force.

SKYFOX on December 7, 2009 at 2:11 PM

Mara, thanks for leaking this.

faraway on December 7, 2009 at 2:12 PM

Defund NPR. NOW!

NTWR on December 7, 2009 at 2:12 PM

I wonder who pays better, NPR or FNC.

Rebar on December 7, 2009 at 2:13 PM

Public radio will can Ol’ Mara.
Bet your bottom dollar that Ol’ Mara…will get canned.

kingsjester on December 7, 2009 at 2:15 PM

I give her credit for standing up to NPR. However, I find her to be one of the weakest analysts on Fox. She repeats Democrat talking points well, but doesn’t seem to be able to interpret them or make an argument for them. As weak as she is, I rather have her on than Mort Kondracke.

huckleberryfriend on December 7, 2009 at 2:16 PM

Irony Alert—isnt having Mara and Williams on fox broadcasts proof that they allow opposing viewpoints on their news shows?

NPR will be offering self inflicted censorship of the liberal viewpoint by the removial of Mara and Juan Williams. Good job looking out for your audience!

Opportunity Costs on December 7, 2009 at 2:16 PM

I wonder who pays better, NPR or FNC.

Rebar on December 7, 2009 at 2:13 PM

Seriously. And if it weren’t for their gigs on Fox News, nobody outside the northeast corridor would know who either Liasson or Williams was. Because of their Fox gigs, they can give paid speeches, sell books, etc.

That NPR thinks they can basically threaten Mara Liasson and think she would choose NPR over Fox is kind of funny.

DaydreamBeliever on December 7, 2009 at 2:17 PM

Both Ms. Liasson and Mr. Williams are assets to Fox and I would be disappointed if they left. I am sure Fox compares favorably when it comes to diversity on their news shows. How many times do conservatives have to watch the likes of Mr. Brooks, Mr. Frum, and Mr. Sullivan as our token representatives? And whenever Juan Williams annoys me I try to remember that he was one of Tony Snow’s best friends. How bad can he be?

Cindy Munford on December 7, 2009 at 2:17 PM

Mara Liasson has been with Fox for over a decade. She’s been on as long as I remember watching Special Report. I much prefer her to Nina Easton or the other liberal/moderates that Fox puts in the middle chair. Her insight is fair, objective and often quite informative. She is an asset to Fox and if she did leave during the whole Obama war on Fox then it would have put the network on the defensive for the short term which is what the corrupt sleaze at NPR was looking to do. In the long term she would have only damaged her own career for turning her back on a netowrk which has given her such exposure and intellectual freedom a cesspool like NPR could never match.

Daemonocracy on December 7, 2009 at 2:18 PM

Is the problem that Liasson appears on Fox or that she’s been known to take some nasty swipes at this Adminstration lately?

Knucklehead on December 7, 2009 at 2:09 PM

Probably the latter. NPR had no problem with Liasson or Juan Williams when they took nasty swipes at the Bush Administration.

As a liberal (but not hard-left) reporter who hears what others are saying on Fox News, Liasson is probably more aware of the holes in Obama’s logic, and criticism from the right, than those in NPR’s echObama chamber, and she’s probably trying to do Obama a favor by pointing them out.

If NPR let Liasson go, it would save taxpayers’ money, while Fox News is a private company, and Liasson could then say whatever she wanted.

Steve Z on December 7, 2009 at 2:19 PM

Ummm, I don’t think Liasson could have folded easily. We’re also talking about $$$$

She is a FNC contributor, that’s likely a 6 figure salary. I remember Marc Lamont Hill giving an interview with some magazine and he stated he was paid 6 figures.

LurkerDood on December 7, 2009 at 2:19 PM

Kirsten Powers has, on occasion, filled the liberal spot on the Special Report panel. For my money, I like A.B. Stoddard filling Mara’s spot, but I applaud Mara for telling NPR to shove it.

Fox does a good job of filling the panel–though they should retire Fred Barnes and Mort Kondracke because it takes forever for those two guys to make their points.

OT: Fox has a good Saturday show called Media Watch in which a Fox moderator hosts two conservatives and two liberals. It’s worth the half hour, and the surely don’t find such a program on any other channel.

BuckeyeSam on December 7, 2009 at 2:20 PM

This surprises anyone about National Propaganda Radio?

nelsonknows on December 7, 2009 at 2:20 PM

Note to Mara: take Juanito with you when you leave.

Kissmygrits on December 7, 2009 at 2:21 PM

Good for her, but she still pales in comparison when matched against Charles Krauthammer on the panel.

SouthernGent on December 7, 2009 at 2:08 PM

But then again, no one on the panel compares to Charles Krauthammer.

ladyingray on December 7, 2009 at 2:21 PM

txag92 on December 7, 2009 at 2:10 PM

Good one!

ladyingray on December 7, 2009 at 2:22 PM

I quit listening to NPR about ten years ago in Chicago, when I realized the program (All Things Considered) was “considering” anal cleansing for an entire afternoon’s programming. I haven’t listened to NPR since. Friend I worked with kept the radio on all the time tuned to NPR until then. I asked him to either turn the station or turn it off. Since he worked FOR me, he turned the station while we were working together. Why the American taxpayer funds this leftist propaganda in the first place is beyond me. This is NOT communist Russia they’re broadcasting to. Maybe they think it is.

bradley11 on December 7, 2009 at 2:25 PM

You are exactly right, if NPR were a business. But since it’s publicly funded and doesn’t give a rat’s arse about profitability, it’s more concerned about politics/headlines.

Those of us in the real world know better, or, at least, should.

pugwriter on December 7, 2009 at 2:25 PM

Ironic, since Dick Meyer works with CBS.

http://www.cbsnews.com/1770-5_162-0.html?query=dick+meyer&tag=srch&searchtype=cbsSearch

What is it, about these cowardly little men, that like picking on women, for the same things they themselves do?

MNHawk on December 7, 2009 at 2:26 PM

NPR is and always has been a left wing entity and an integral part of the Obama regime’s propaganda machine. It’s an absolute disgrace for this country to fund this leftist broadcast network. Their allegations of political bias by FOX is at best a sick joke.

rplat on December 7, 2009 at 2:26 PM

Radio Free Europe I was thinking of. Not “communist Russia” as such. Got it backwards. I need a nap.

bradley11 on December 7, 2009 at 2:26 PM

NPR is a news organization? Funny, but I always took figured them as an arm of the Democrat Party.

JammieWearingFool on December 7, 2009 at 2:26 PM

BuckeyeSam on December 7, 2009 at 2:20 PM

It’s actually called “News Watch” and it’s one of my favorite, cannot miss, Fox shows. But their latest addition of Judith Miller is driving me crazy. She is the epitome of Obama talking points.

Knucklehead on December 7, 2009 at 2:27 PM

Her presence on Fox shows that the network welcomes liberal points of view (which no one can doubt Liasson holds), more so than some any and all networks welcome conservatives

Bill Bennet barely appears on CNN, and when he does he’s cowed by the likes of Donna Brazille, Roland Martin, et al. When he opens his mouth he’s apologizing for conservatism half the time.

Mara Liarson by comparison gets much more face time on Fox than any right-winger gets from all of the major leftist electronic media combined.

If NPR wants to show some balance and diversity, maybe they could bring in some heterosexuals once in a while.

Western_Civ on December 7, 2009 at 2:27 PM

Another reason why NPR should get no taxpayer money.

echosyst on December 7, 2009 at 2:28 PM

Good for her, but she still pales in comparison when matched against Charles Krauthammer on the panel.

SouthernGent on December 7, 2009 at 2:08 PM

But then again, no one on the panel compares to Charles Krauthammer.

ladyingray on December 7, 2009 at 2:21 PM

Actually, Mara doesn’t try to be Charles Krauthammer, or try come across as the smartest person in the room. I’ve always thought she was very natural, and contrary to some others here, said what she thought rather than parroting Democrat talking points, which Nina Easton most definitely does. Mara also describer herself once as a “girl reporter,” which shows that she doesn’t take herself so seriously.

Put it this way, she is not a hate-filled leftist hag like Andrea Mitshell.

DaydreamBeliever on December 7, 2009 at 2:28 PM

About Captain Combover, Ron Elving?

http://www.thecapitol.net/Faculty/facultybioa.html

He has been an election night commentator on the PBS News Hour with Jim Lehrer and a returning guest on CNN and several other cable TV networks including C-SPAN, CNBC, Bloomberg TV, and Fox News.

Heh.

MNHawk on December 7, 2009 at 2:28 PM

Ummm, I don’t think Liasson could have folded easily. We’re also talking about $$$$

She is a FNC contributor, that’s likely a 6 figure salary. I remember Marc Lamont Hill giving an interview with some magazine and he stated he was paid 6 figures.

LurkerDood on December 7, 2009 at 2:19 PM

what are you kidding me? That talking tape recorder for every liberal talking point out there gets paid that kind of money? Has he had an original thought other than what some far left left race baiter wrote in the 1960s?

HE gets 6 figures? Everytime I see him on I just turn the channel because I know what he is going to say already. That really pisses me off he gets paid so much for doing so little.

Daemonocracy on December 7, 2009 at 2:29 PM

Perhaps Liasson doesn’t have a voice that’s low and breathy enough for NPR, or she refuses to add a fake British accent.

Considering that you can actually hear what Liasson has to say when she speaks, rather than straining to catch some sort of hushed and contrived melodramatic panting that the rest of the NPR morons utilize, I’d say keep her on forever.

Bishop on December 7, 2009 at 2:29 PM

But what is NPR doing by pressuring Liasson anyway?

enforcing their code of ethics (fox viewers my be unfamiliar with the term, though). besides, as a taxpayer-funded news organization, NPR also has no business getting involved in fox attacks on the government.

sesquipedalian on December 7, 2009 at 2:30 PM

good for Mara. She seems a principled reporter whose opinion I value. I like to see her on Bret’s show with the invenerable CK and others like Stephen Hayes or whomever else they have on.

Thanks for the info.

ted c on December 7, 2009 at 2:31 PM

Knucklehead on December 7, 2009 at 2:27 PM

The journalist professor that use to be on, Jane Somebody, was on CNN badmouthing FOX a couple of weeks ago. She said she left because the bias was becoming more pronunced. I thought it was because O’Reilly wouldn’t shut his stupid mouth when she was on his show but now I am thinking she got the memo from the WH.

Cindy Munford on December 7, 2009 at 2:32 PM

sesquipedalian on December 7, 2009 at 2:30 PM

It sure didn’t stop them from going after Boooosh.

kingsjester on December 7, 2009 at 2:33 PM

I am pretty sure that should be journalism professor. Oopsie!

Cindy Munford on December 7, 2009 at 2:33 PM

enforcing their code of ethics (fox viewers my be unfamiliar with the term, though)

You would be wrong. Why just today FOX taught their viewers about ethics by airing news about Max Baucus and his mistress/appointee.

Bishop on December 7, 2009 at 2:33 PM

I profoundly disagree with some comments here. I think Liasson adds a tremendous amount to both Special report & FNS. I’m not interested in echo chambers, I want to hear sides of an issue – debate is healthy.

I rarely if ever agree with Liasson or Juan Williams but I respect them both, their appearances on FNC only deepen that imho.

saus on December 7, 2009 at 2:35 PM

But then again, no one on the panel compares to Charles Krauthammer.

ladyingray on December 7, 2009 at 2:21 PM

Yes, I agree. The room goes silent when the good doctor draws breath, ready to opine.

I have always like Juan and Maura – going way back listening to them on NPR. If NPR continues to whine like a mule I certainly hope that Rupert opens up his wallet wide and welcomes the two of them on board with open arms.

turfmann on December 7, 2009 at 2:35 PM

Why is NPR only pressuring Mara? Why not Juan Williams as well?

yogi41 on December 7, 2009 at 2:38 PM

Did they (NPR) single out Mara Liasson? Juan Williams is another target. What happened (or not happened) to JW?

Sir Napsalot on December 7, 2009 at 2:38 PM

what are you kidding me? That talking tape recorder for every liberal talking point out there gets paid that kind of money? Has he had an original thought other than what some far left left race baiter wrote in the 1960s?

HE gets 6 figures? Everytime I see him on I just turn the channel because I know what he is going to say already. That really pisses me off he gets paid so much for doing so little.

Daemonocracy on December 7, 2009 at 2:29 PM

Murdoch fired him so no more FNC $$$$ =)

Although he did appear like 2 times on BOR and I also saw him once on Fox Biz but without the FNC contributor title.

LurkerDood on December 7, 2009 at 2:39 PM

Why just today FOX taught their viewers about ethics by airing news about Max Baucus and his mistress/appointee.

Bishop on December 7, 2009 at 2:33 PM

followed by an update on the ensign corruption scandal, i’m sure.

sesquipedalian on December 7, 2009 at 2:40 PM

Cindy Munford on December 7, 2009 at 2:32 PM

Jane Hall says she quit FOX because of their slanted coverage and Beck is scary.

Knucklehead on December 7, 2009 at 2:42 PM

I note, of course, that Fox News is not asking her to sever ties with NPR for their very real bias…

landshark on December 7, 2009 at 2:43 PM

If Liasson is under contract to Fox, NPR interferes with that contract at its peril.

james23 on December 7, 2009 at 2:46 PM

enforcing their code of ethics (fox viewers my be unfamiliar with the term, though). besides, as a taxpayer-funded news organization, NPR also has no business getting involved in fox attacks on the government.

sesquipedalian on December 7, 2009 at 2:30 PM

Let’s translate this from Tard to English, and maybe fix it up a little.

NPR is enforcing the Chicago Code (supporters of the dumbest President in history my be unfamiliar with the term, though.) Besides, as a taxpayer-funded news organization, NPR also has a duty to the biggest pu$$y to ever sit in the oval office, to never engage in anything but the most flattering reporting.

MNHawk on December 7, 2009 at 2:47 PM

The irony is that by encouraging all Democrats to boycott Fox, they’re forcing Fox to become less “fair & balanced.”

There’s no reason for it. I could understand a boycott if Fox mistreated liberals like MSNBC continuously mistreats conservatives. But it just ain’t so. Fox by and large is respectful and fair to its liberal guests. (Even Hannity will allow liberal guests on his “Great American Panel” to get their points out.)

So it’s a pretty damn cynical media strategy to intentionally give up an opportunity to persuade an audience as to your point of view and, instead, to try and “choke” and marginalize Fox.

Outlander on December 7, 2009 at 2:48 PM

This business about Fox is disturbing to me because the viewership is so telling. Fox IS the major news source. None of the other networks can even claim to come close.

So when there’s a suggestion that the major news outlet is to be avoided, I can’t help but think that the strategy is to keep news from people.

That bothers me.

AnninCA on December 7, 2009 at 2:48 PM

Did NPR sign up for Obama’s war on Fox?

Did they volunteer or were they drafted?

FloatingRock on December 7, 2009 at 2:09 PM

Nice little gig you guys got going on there at NPR. I like your style. Hate to see the federal funding dry up. – Rahm Emanuel

bloviator on December 7, 2009 at 2:53 PM

I noticed her new attitude on Fox news and now we know why. When the mamogram controversy came up–her response was–”But Kathern promised that would not be changed”–I thought-when do we belive what anyone in government promises –let alone think that is a good excuse to change the healthcare system. Watch her closely–much more defensive about Obie and his admin.

mainliner on December 7, 2009 at 2:53 PM

Remember, they believe in diversity and pluralism.

Sometimes.

SteveMG on December 7, 2009 at 2:06 PM

diversity to them is every viewpoint between lenin and trotsky.

reliapundit on December 7, 2009 at 2:54 PM

I have huge respect for Mara. I don’t agree with her much but she is fair and balanced. NPR, I want my money back.

d1carter on December 7, 2009 at 2:54 PM

I simply am appalled by the current trend to discourage Fox from being able to offer balanced viewpoints by insisting that liberal journalists turn down these spots.

You cannot have it both ways.

This reads to me a lot more like trying to slay the giant.

AnninCA on December 7, 2009 at 2:57 PM

Unless they want to offer her an exclusive contract and compensation for breaking her pact with Fox

Hahahahahaha. They’re liberals. She’s supposed to do it out of the goodness of her heart.

GarandFan on December 7, 2009 at 2:58 PM

If the argument is that Fox isn’t balanced, then the solution is obviously opposite of what this suggests: No liberal voice should be heard.

That’s absurd thinking.

NPR needs to explain the thinking. And it needs to revise its thinking.

Pronto.

AnninCA on December 7, 2009 at 2:59 PM

It is amazing how much control that cross-eyed bastard Soros wants in this country. I say throw him out and keep him out.

bluegrass on December 7, 2009 at 2:59 PM

I love Washington week. I must say, however, this week?

They were so misstating the new policy about Afghanastan, it was startling.

They misquoted and misrespresented Gates the worst.

I really was a bit surprised by how “off” they were.

AnninCA on December 7, 2009 at 3:01 PM

diversity to them is every viewpoint between lenin and trotsky.

reliapundit on December 7, 2009 at 2:54 PM

Groan……please, we’re so not remotely close to communism.

What we’re honestly debating is how much government do we wish.

And let me remind a lot of conservative posters here, it works both ways.

Reagan can’t be the past God if you don’t want a current God.

Either you don’t think government can do much or you do.

But you can’t have it both ways.

AnninCA on December 7, 2009 at 3:03 PM

Knucklehead on December 7, 2009 at 2:42 PM

I was disappointed that she left but I think it is bad form to go on other shows bashing her former employer. As for Mr. Beck, don’t go on his show or better yet go on his show and stand up for what you believe. It seems cowardly to me.

Cindy Munford on December 7, 2009 at 3:04 PM

I can see back in the day when most people had 5 or 6 TV stations PBS had a purpose to give people access to programming they wouldn’t see on network TV.

Today we have a 500 channels available on cable and satellite with every conceivable topic having its own devoted channel. Biographies? Go to the Bio channel. Science documentaries? There are 5 Discovery channels, NatGeo and 10 others. Everything on PBS can be found elsewhere.

angryed on December 7, 2009 at 3:05 PM

None of this makes sense to me. Why would NPR want to stop the Liberal point of view from being served on FOX?

The only motive for the administration’s call for Liberals to distance themselves from FOX is so that THEY can give credibility to their claims that FOX is bias.

Of course NPR would take those “marching orders” seriously and ask Liasson to quit. After all, Obama controls their funding.

No conflict at all…right? :)

AnthonyK on December 7, 2009 at 3:06 PM

I have watched Mara Liasson on Fox on several occasions and I always got the impression that she was smart and fair. I don’t always agree with her, but she is not some kook either.

Terrye on December 7, 2009 at 3:07 PM

My tax dollars at work

Capitalist Infidel on December 7, 2009 at 3:07 PM

If Fox isn’t fair and balanced then why is the WH trying to get rid of their Left leaning contributors? If something isn’t true, make it so. Dirty pool.

Cindy Munford on December 7, 2009 at 3:08 PM

And this is a perfect example of a Catch-22….
You put people on to be balanced, and it proves you are un-balanced…

right2bright on December 7, 2009 at 3:11 PM

Come on, get real….NPR is simply MSNBC with better talent.

JIMV on December 7, 2009 at 3:13 PM

I guess that even a few lefties understand that under a tyranny nobody has any rights, themselves included.

docdave on December 7, 2009 at 3:14 PM

enforcing their code of ethics (fox viewers my be unfamiliar with the term, though). besides, as a taxpayer-funded news organization, NPR also has no business getting involved in fox attacks on the government.

sesquipedalian on December 7, 2009 at 2:30 PM

1. The NPR Code of Ethics atates that if someone from NPR wants to make a speaking engagement or a broadcast appearance, they must get NPR’s permission in writing first.

Since Mara has been doing this gig for a decade now, obviously she has this permission in writing. It’s clear that in NPR’s Goebbelsesque post-Bush vision, she has suddenly and only now “violated” this Code.

2. NPR only gets 2% of their income from the Government. Used to be much more.

Del Dolemonte on December 7, 2009 at 3:16 PM

Wouldn’t bother me if Mara left Fox, since I ignore each and every one of her liberal talking points anyway.

Krauthammer usually smirks through most of her commentary, then slams the door on her perspective when he’s up to bat.

fogw on December 7, 2009 at 3:18 PM

Come on, get real….NPR is simply MSNBC with better talent.

JIMV on December 7, 2009 at 3:13 PM

Not to me, anyway. I truly respect Gwen Ifil, for example.

She was writing a book about Obama when she handled the NPR VP debate. The world was aflutter.

I was glad to see Sarah wasn’t.

Neither was I. I have watched Gwen for years, and she’s a consummate professional. She was in the VP debate, too.

I remain glad to see that Sarah gave her kudos.

I’d like to see a lot more of Gwen, even on Fox, although I suspect she steers clear of all that shark pool.

No, I disagree. NPR isn’t perfect. This story really, really disappoints me.

But at this point?

I’d say, still support it. This is more objective than what is going on in the private sector.

AnninCA on December 7, 2009 at 3:18 PM

The only motive for the administration’s call for Liberals to distance themselves from FOX is so that THEY can give credibility to their claims that FOX is bias.

No, you are wrong. The motive is who actually sends in donations.

It’s mostly liberals right now. You want this to stop?

Support NPR, and make sure they know you’re a conservative.

AnninCA on December 7, 2009 at 3:20 PM

Support NPR, and make sure they know you’re a conservative.
AnninCA on December 7, 2009 at 3:20 PM

Not a chance…They would use my money to support their views. They are not stupid, they are just ignorant!

AnthonyK on December 7, 2009 at 3:25 PM

Del Dolemonte on December 7, 2009 at 3:16 PM

10. In appearing on TV or other media including electronic Web-based forums, NPR journalists… should not participate in shows electronic forums, or blogs that encourage punditry and speculation rather than rather than fact-based analysis.

faux news, in other words.

sesquipedalian on December 7, 2009 at 3:26 PM

Come on, get real….NPR is simply MSNBC with better talent.

Plus on the radio you don’t have to look at the moonbats, although Ms. Liasson is not too hard to look at, I’ll admit.

drunyan8315 on December 7, 2009 at 3:29 PM

No, I disagree. NPR isn’t perfect. This story really, really disappoints me.

But at this point?

I’d say, still support it. This is more objective than what is going on in the private sector.

AnninCA on December 7, 2009 at 3:18 PM

*LOL

Ann is off the meds again.

angryed on December 7, 2009 at 3:29 PM

She’s professional and represented my point of view fairly in the editing process both times.

That’s cool. My wife got the exact opposite after being filmed and then edited by NPR.

unclesmrgol on December 7, 2009 at 3:30 PM

Robert Siegel (NPR) was in Dallas last week attending Tea Parties, coordinator meetings, etc., interviewing lots of members and recording everything. Said they were in a meeting talking about the TP groups and they figured out no one had ever spoken with any of the members; so they flew in. Seemed to be surprised when they learned we are NOT endorsing candidates, we ARE bringing candidates in to talk to the groups so people can form their own opinions, and we aren’t racist. They “promised” to be fair. We’ll see.

Yellowdog12 on December 7, 2009 at 3:30 PM

I’d like to see a lot more of Gwen, even on Fox, although I suspect she steers clear of all that shark pool.

AnninCA on December 7, 2009 at 3:18 PM

True, she does most of her swimming over at the NBC cesspool. It’s safe to go in the water there, but you come out with a stench.

fogw on December 7, 2009 at 3:31 PM

That’s cool. My wife got the exact opposite after being filmed and then edited by NPR.

unclesmrgol on December 7, 2009 at 3:30 PM

Tell, tell. I don’t question the story. I’m not a believer that ANY communicator is totally “truth.”

That’s trying to be God.

But in any case, I’d love to hear the story.

AnninCA on December 7, 2009 at 3:32 PM

I would like to know what I should be outraged about more, NPR for applying pressure to woman, making this a sexist/feminist issue or avoiding applying the same pressure on Juan Williams making it a racist issue.

booter on December 7, 2009 at 3:34 PM

True, she does most of her swimming over at the NBC cesspool. It’s safe to go in the water there, but you come out with a stench.

fogw on December 7, 2009 at 3:31 PM

Really? I’ve never seen her over there.

Have I missed something?

BTW, I think those of you claiming to be conservative who didn’t see what a terrific job she did with the VP debate are WAY OUT THERE.

Even Sarah gives her kudos.

She was excellent.

AnninCA on December 7, 2009 at 3:34 PM

Comment pages: 1 2