Great news: Male cleavage officially back in fashion
posted at 9:51 pm on December 4, 2009 by Allahpundit
Not our usual fare, but (a) it’s Friday, (b) the site has been too thin on lighter-side stuff lately, and (c) this is no minor fashion story. We’re talking about the return of chest pubes here. An epochal event and news you can use, direct from our RSS reader to your neckline just in time for office holiday parties.
The word of the day is “heavage”:
The latest resurrection of man cleavage does raise a not-so insignificant issue: to wax or not? For a number of years, any male chest hair was considered a fashion don’t, but very recently a thin thatch has become quite acceptable. The low-cut look “is better if you have a little chest hair,” says Tyler Thoreson, a New York-based men’s style consultant. “It’s not about showing off chest hair, it’s about it peeking out a little bit.”
Robert Caponi, a 32-year-old musician in Greensboro, N.C., isn’t taking any chances. In order to get the hair-to-skin ratio just right, he shaves his chest every two weeks or so — a regimen that helps him to feel comfortable in one of the six deep V-neck shirts he owns. Not all styles fit the bill. After purchasing a wide scoop neck recently, he declared it simply too revealing. “I looked in the mirror and I was disgusted,” he says.
Believe it or not, this topic generated a bunch of feedback on Twitter from women, with the Hammer herself weighing in to declare chest hair a good thing but V-neck t-shirts very much not. (A sentiment shared by others.) I await the verdict in the comments. Exit question: Can a new vogue for the Magnum ‘stache be long in coming?
Update: Says commenter SteveMG of our neo-Carter-esque era, “It really is starting to feel like the seventies.”









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
yeeesh
bridgetown on December 5, 2009 at 11:13 AM
I prefer my men manly and normal. I prefer them to be men of action, not mincing. He needs to smell of work and protectiveness, not whatever the hell crap is the latest pansy scent.
I’m sticking to what I know and have already.
Mommynator on December 5, 2009 at 11:28 AM
D2, your story contradicts that statement. However, in your defense you have a very high price!
Ladies, if chest hair is ok, you’ll love my back and shoulders!
TugboatPhil on December 5, 2009 at 11:30 AM
Major props on the subhead, AP.
Mantastic.
Fantastic.
Chuckles. Aplenty.
radioboyatl on December 5, 2009 at 12:05 PM
Uhhh, men in tube tops — no, just NO.
I’ve always preferred moderate chest hair to no chest hair. I don’t need a man to look pre-pubescent to find him attractive.
SheofTwoMinds on December 5, 2009 at 2:18 PM
Early in our relationship, my husband-to-be described himself to me as “hirsute.” I thought he said “hair suit.”
Turned out to be a pretty good description.
SheofTwoMinds on December 5, 2009 at 2:33 PM
Ummmmm, that’s just weird. It’s not going to catch on.
OneGyT on December 5, 2009 at 3:19 PM
I’m pretty tired of gay males deciding not only what is “in fashion” for other males but also for women as well as what is sexually desirable for both sexes. Creepy.
But considering that even the high fashions trickle down to the low fashions at Wal-Mart and Beall’s, guess we don’t have much choice…unless we want to all wear Bocephus T-shirts and Remington camouflage hunting jackets.
Dr. ZhivBlago on December 5, 2009 at 4:35 PM
That was you?
mizflame98 on December 6, 2009 at 11:20 AM
Awww Yeah!
mizflame98 on December 6, 2009 at 11:33 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2