Video: Behar says only right-wingers can be hypocrites, or something

posted at 5:00 pm on December 3, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

Somehow, this would be more compelling coming from anywhere but Hollywood, where infidelity floats a significant portion of the entertainment medium — which brings us right back to Tiger Woods. Joy Behar tries to make a point that isn’t entirely out of left field, or Left field, for that matter: family-values politicians who commit infidelities, such as hiking the Appalachian trail, are most definitely hypocrites when they do. That doesn’t let liberals off the hook for hypocrisy when cheating on their spouses, though, as Elizabeth Hasselbeck points out in this clip from The View — nor does it apply to those who don’t participate in the political process at all despite having a huge media platform (via Greg Hengler):

Most of the Tiger Woods commentary is nonsense, and this is possibly the nadir of the cottage industry. Tiger doesn’t do politics anyway, which has already earned him criticism from African-American athletes such as Jim Brown and Bill Russell for selfishness, if not hypocrisy. If he did, then it would make sense to discuss the public exposure of infidelity in a political context. As it is, it’s about as political as any celebrity having gotten caught cheating on a spouse.

That doesn’t let Tiger off the hook for his (apparently) multiple “transgressions,” of course, and he monetizes his squeaky-clean image
for enormous personal gain, so public discussion of it is not out of bounds, either. However, it hardly seems like news that multi-millionaire athletes have groupies, and that they let temptation get the better of them. What’s news is that we let that squeaky-clean public relations image take root so deeply that we feel betrayed, where with other athletes we’d probably just shrug and chalk it up as typically bad behavior.

Meanwhile, Behar wants to use it as a way to beat up on conservatives who don’t cheat while letting Tiger off the hook for his “transgressions.” If one can find a better example of hypocrisy, be sure to forward it to us.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Actually Behar is correct. One can only be a hypocrite if one violates one’s own stated standards. If someone doesn’t have standards, he’s not a hypocrite.

But the fact is that Tiger admits to violating his own standards. So he is a hypocrite and Behar’s argument is specious.

Moreover, the greater question is whether not having standards is a better thing than having standards and living up to them imperfectly. Has Behar contemplated a world in which there are no moral standards? This is the line of reasoning Elizabeth would have done well to pursue.

paul1149 on December 3, 2009 at 7:31 PM

“It’s none of my business but I make my living talking to millions about it anyway.” = hypocrisy on steroids.

snaggletoothie on December 3, 2009 at 7:35 PM

You know who would make a good pair…she and Waxman…imagine it if you dare..

winston on December 3, 2009

I just threw up a little bit in my mouth

Kevin43 on December 3, 2009 at 7:37 PM

paul1149

You seem to suggest that many hypocrites are a sign of moral health. I seriously think that’s right. Behar wouldn’t understand since she’s only looking for a cheep gotcha.

snaggletoothie on December 3, 2009 at 7:40 PM

Bad news , Tiger is a right winger by her standards .

borntoraisehogs on December 3, 2009 at 7:42 PM

Behar is the poster child for Moonbats.

CWforFreedom on December 3, 2009 at 7:42 PM

Joy Behar tries to make a point that isn’t entirely out of left field, or Left field, for that matter: family-values politicians who commit infidelities … are most definitely hypocrites when they do.

Actually, no. Hypocrisy is a long-term pattern of not believing what you preach; it’s the playing of a part and the wearing of a false mask. The preacher who commits adultery is not necessarily a hypocrite; the preacher who doesn’t believe in what he preaches but acts as if he does is a hypocrite.

Bill Ramey on December 3, 2009 at 7:57 PM

…Moreover, the greater question is whether not having standards is a better thing than having standards and living up to them imperfectly. Has Behar contemplated a world in which there are no moral standards? This is the line of reasoning Elizabeth would have done well to pursue.

paul1149 on December 3, 2009 at 7:31 PM

Elizabeth, God bless her; she tries. She gets set up so many times to hit home runs but usually fails miserably. Got to give her credit for passion, though. I would be a lot harsher on her but she is hot and I am a horrible male creature.

yubley on December 3, 2009 at 8:35 PM

She gets set up so many times to hit home runs but usually fails miserably.

yubley on December 3, 2009 at 8:35 PM

Which is why she’s allowed on that show… the rest of those vapid whooors wouldn’t be able to defend their idiotic statements if they went up against a person who could actually articulate conservative principles.

jana on December 3, 2009 at 8:41 PM

You know who would make a good pair…she and Waxman…imagine it if you dare..

winston on December 3, 2009

I just threw up a little bit in my mouth

Kevin43 on December 3, 2009 at 7:37 PM

I just threw up a lot.

jana on December 3, 2009 at 8:42 PM

PIG!

dmann on December 3, 2009 at 8:52 PM

The turd that won’t flush.

jdkchem on December 3, 2009 at 8:55 PM

beHar! beHar!……Sorry, I was choking on something.

Coronagold on December 3, 2009 at 9:54 PM

we let that squeaky-clean public relations image take root so deeply

Job 5:2a,3
[J]ealousy kills the simple.
I have seen the foolish taking root,
And I cursed his abode immediately.

davidk on December 3, 2009 at 11:02 PM

What is “The View?” And why should I give half a crap???
If my fading memory serves me correctly, Joy Behar was a (very poor) stand-up comic doing skits back in the ’80s.
I guess she is now a very-poor host of some stupid talk show on some meaningless TV channel…

Please don’t feed the trolls.

Really, this just makes me yawn. I have never seen “The View,” and now, more than ever, I will run like mad if I ever even see a promo.

Please don’t feed the trolls

shorebird on December 4, 2009 at 1:55 AM

This is the fundamental tenant of the Liberal Religion.

As long as you obey the sole sacrament of Moral Relevancy: Thou Shalt Have No Standards, then you are not merely absolved of sin, but presumptively immune from sin. Through the Miracle Of Subjectivism, absolutely nothing any liberal ever does can possibly be considered “wrong”.

Meanwhile, of course, no one who has any standards at all can possibly be perfect at abiding by them. This makes every non-liberal in the world guilty of the only sin the Religion of Liberalism recognizes: that of “hypocrisy.”

This is the ultimate form of freedom: People who not mere self-serving hedonists, but publically self-congratulating hedonists, feel perfectly justified in criticizing everyone else in the world with an air of Moral Superiority that would have shamed a 16th-Century Spanish Inquisitor.

logis on December 4, 2009 at 8:41 AM

This just makes me beg the question once again… How do women watch these harpies ramble on for an hour a day??

3 Seconds into the video and I was already getting a headache from that nasal voice of hers. Once the video was done, my headache is gone.

jeffn21 on December 4, 2009 at 8:54 AM

Actually Behar is correct. One can only be a hypocrite if one violates one’s own stated standards. If someone doesn’t have standards, he’s not a hypocrite. paul1149 on December 3, 2009 at 7:31 PM

I agree Paul. It is difficult to criticize Democrats for hypocrisy for moral failings, because they are manifestly amoral. Republicans are held to a higher standard which is as it should be.

WarEagle01 on December 4, 2009 at 9:23 AM

I agree Paul. It is difficult to criticize Democrats for hypocrisy for moral failings, because they are manifestly amoral. Republicans are held to a higher standard which is as it should be.
WarEagle01 on December 4, 2009 at 9:23 AM

Well, no. I don’t know whether what you typed was an inadvertent passive-voice grammatical error, but the way you stated that is completely wrong.

Of course conservatives should hold THEMSELVES to a higher standard. And, of course, we do.

But for a LIBERAL to do that makes her the ultimate in hypocrisy.

Technically, simply being a self-congratulatory sleezeball doesn’t, by itself, make one a “hypocrite.”

But, of course, the people who manifestly eschew the entire concept of standards altogether have absolutely no business whatsoever criticizing ANYONE for ANYTHING – ever.

And the fact that liberals constantly do that doesn’t merely make them run-of-the-mill hypocrites. Liberalism itself is the political embodiment of hypocrisy itself. To adopt that belief system (or, as they would call it: a “non-belief system”) is to practice hypocrisy as not merely a momentary weakness, but as an all-encompassing way of life.

logis on December 4, 2009 at 10:15 AM

Comment pages: 1 2