Quotes of the day

posted at 10:35 pm on December 2, 2009 by Allahpundit

“‘If you are a liberal Democrat who won the nomination with the support of the anti-war left, this had to be one of the most difficult decisions he’ll ever make,’ Gingrich said. ‘And he did what he felt was right for the country.

“‘I think he knew when he did it he was going to split his own party, and I think that took considerable courage on his part,’ he said.”

***
“President Barack Obama’s speech on Tuesday night deserves to be cheered. Over the objections of his vice president and despite opposition from his political base, the president is sending an additional 30,000 troops to Afghanistan to fight terrorists…

“The Democratic Party’s antiwar faction is upset over the president’s decision. It’s almost as if they didn’t think Mr. Obama meant it when he said of Afghanistan during the presidential campaign that ‘this is a war we have to win’ and a ‘war of necessity.’…

“Fortunately, the antiwar left has little power to stop the president from making good on his commitments. Notwithstanding Mr. Obama’s vote against funding the war in Afghanistan in May 2007, the White House can win a battle over war funding by standing with a coalition of victory-centered Republicans and Democrats who don’t want their president embarrassed.”

***
“‘There will be conditions,’ said Rep. John Murtha, who will manage what’s anticipated to be a $35 billion to $40 billion request for new Pentagon and State Department funding in support of the president’s policy. And the Pennsylvania Democrat believes Obama and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) each has an interest in avoiding outright conflict that would surrender the issue to Republicans.

“‘I know Nancy is very uncomfortable if this were to pass without a majority of Democrats. Very uncomfortable,’ Murtha told POLITICO.”

***
“But by specifying a date to begin troop withdrawals, Obama has placed a sword of Damocles above his own head. When July 2011 comes, the likelihood is that Afghanistan will still be, to one degree or another, an awful mess. Then Obama will need to decide whether to begin the exit or not. If he does, the right will pummel him for cutting and running before the job is complete — and in the process, risking a damaging reversion to chaos. If he does not, the left is likely to explode. Mark my words, in this scenario we might well see Obama challenged in the 2012 Democratic-nomination fight from his left.

“Sound far-fetched? Maybe, but it shouldn’t. With his speech last night, Obama took ownership of the Afghan war — and, though his arguments were more rigorous and cogent than George W. Bush’s would have been, he ended up in a distinctly 43-ish place. (His people are even calling the troop escalation a ‘surge,’ for heaven’s sake.) How long will it take before the members of Obama’s base start muttering: ‘Change, my ass’?”

***

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

Gingrich said

*spit*

Democrats who don’t want their president embarrassed

The others are racist.

Murtha, who will manage what’s anticipated to be a $35 billion to $40 billion request

“What could go wrong?”

though his arguments were more rigorous and cogent than George W. Bush’s would have been

They just cannot not bash Bush

davidk on December 3, 2009 at 8:05 AM

back to the original post: yes, Afghanistan will be a mess in 2011, 2012 & every year thereafter until the end of time.

and though I believe military commentators, my own Army vet brother & others that we need to contain the bulk of the terrorists “over there” rather than let them wander “over here”, I won’t support the needless killing of our soldiers if the White House won’t get behind them.

so I think that by 2011, there will be fewer people supporting our military presence in Afghanistan.

kelley in virginia on December 3, 2009 at 8:06 AM

Gingrich said. ‘And he did what he felt was right for the country.

Personally, I can’t stand Obama. However, I agree with Gingrich on this one; in general, Obama does do what he thinks is right. The problem is, in order to understand his ‘right’ you have to believe in all kinds of magical mental pixies, like global warming, socialism, and global citizenship.

bitsy on December 3, 2009 at 8:22 AM

What a bunch of suckers from a normally astute comment section.

The Left is NEVER going to leave this guy, and he’ll NEVER leave them. They are winking at each other while putting on a show. The Left has NEVER had a problem with military aggression when it strengthens its communist/fascist agenda.

Read your f’n history for cryin’ out loud. The Michael Moore/Cindy Sheehan spectacle is a decoy.

Wake up.

Saltysam on December 3, 2009 at 8:32 AM

Is that Godzilla standing between those two gentlement

kingsjester on December 3, 2009 at 8:38 AM

gentlement=gentlemen?

kingsjester on December 3, 2009 at 8:39 AM

each has an interest in avoiding outright conflict that would surrender the issue to Republicans.

Once again, politics before security.

Democrats suck.

drjohn on December 3, 2009 at 8:41 AM

Saltysam on December 3, 2009 at 8:32 AM

Exactly. Despite all the “Join the Revolution” sing-song peace and love ignorance, the Marxist revolutionist is all about busting heads.

davidk on December 3, 2009 at 8:42 AM

“‘I think he knew when he did it he was going to split his own party, and I think that took considerable courage on his part,’ he said.”

Someone really needs to smack Newt over the head with something. He is on a major losing streak.

Courage? It takes courage to signal to Al Qaeda when you intend to leave? Which happens to be at the beginning of the 2012 campagin season?

Newt, go away.

drjohn on December 3, 2009 at 8:43 AM

If Pelosi wasn’t spending so much of the countries money on expensive jets for herself, there would be a lot more money to go toward medical care for wounded vets.
THESE PEOPLE ARE PARASITES!

Cybergeezer on December 3, 2009 at 8:48 AM

So Newt says we’re supposed to give The Messiah brownie points just because his Liberal base is so loathesome?

Nope.

Golden Boy on December 3, 2009 at 8:52 AM

So, are we going the way of LGF by pointing out each and every typo and/or spelling error? Just something I’ve noticed more of lately.

princetrumpet on December 3, 2009 at 9:33 AM

So, is Murtha saying SFNan isn’t going to fund the troops without a lot of goodies attached to the bill to rally her fellow sleaze balls in the House. Newt is still trying to sell books and appear moderate and reasonable and keep his gig going on Fox.

Kissmygrits on December 3, 2009 at 9:36 AM

This POTUS is still untrustworthy and a bald faced liar.

royzer on December 3, 2009 at 12:08 PM

Triangulation v.2

Jvette on December 3, 2009 at 12:24 PM

Presidentin is hard.

Dr Evil on December 3, 2009 at 1:27 PM

Newt us dead/done/what an ASS!! ,No ,Newt its not within the context of whether he sucked off his base enough,its within the context of whetehr its good for the military ,and the nation.Excommunicate Newt

theTarCzar on December 3, 2009 at 6:18 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4