Rasmussen: 71% angry at federal government
posted at 11:36 am on December 1, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Rasmussen‘s latest survey shows anger at the federal government moving to a 3-1 position, with 71% of likely voters “angry”. Almost a majority claim to be “very angry,” at 46%. But what does that mean — and how would Congress and the White House defuse the anger?
Seventy-one percent (71%) of voters nationwide say they’re at least somewhat angry about the current policies of the federal government. That figure includes 46% who are Very Angry.
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that only 27% are not angry about the government’s policies, including 10% who are Not at All Angry.
Men are angrier than women, and voters over 40 are more angry than those who are younger. A majority of those over 40 are Very Angry. Only 25% of under-30 voters share that view.
The data suggests that the level of anger is growing. The 71% who are angry at federal government policies today is up five percentage points since September.
Even more stunning, the 46% who are Very Angry is up 10 percentage points from September.
The most one can take out of the topline numbers is that 2010 will be a bad year for incumbents. When voters get angry, they take it out at the ballot box, and that means Democrats will get the brunt of it regardless of the cause. But Republicans do not comprise 71% of voters, nor even Republicans and independents put together, which means that some of the angry voters may be dissatisfied with the inability of Barack Obama and the Democrats to enact a progressive agenda.
In this sense, it’s about as useful an indicator as the right direction/wrong direction question every pollster likes to ask. About the only predictive value it has is in measuring anti-incumbent tilt, a “throw the bums out” indicator. “Direction,” like “anger,” depends entirely on the subjective evaluation of each individual.
But who’s the most angry? In reviewing the crosstabs, there are some surprising results. The angriest ethnic demographic is actually Other, with 87% either somewhat or very angry. That’s in comparison to black voters, of which only 37% are angry and 57% are not, and white voters at 74/25. Two-thirds of women are angry, and three-quarters of men. The angriest age demographic is 40-49, but the 18-29 year olds are also pretty steamed, 69/31. Independents are almost as angry as Republicans, 84/14 and 89/10 respectively, but Democrats aren’t exactly cheery at 46/49. The only income demographic with less than 63% angry is the $100K+ sector. The angriest income demos are the solidly middle class $40K-$60K (79/21) and $60k-$75K (76/15).
That gives us a better sense of the anger. The middle class, which Barack Obama successfully wooed in 2008, have become very disenchanted with the current leadership. Middle-aged people have also gotten angry. The big problem for Democrats beyond the anti-incumbent tilt going into 2010 is the massive anger among independents, which we have tracked for several months. Democrats appear to have completely alienated a key voting bloc, and furthermore, motivated them into action. At the same time, they’re demotivating their own base.
If this trend continues, we may see an electoral wipeout next November.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
The need for new blood is great.
upinak on December 1, 2009 at 11:38 AM
No Incumbent Left Behind
Send Back the Clowns
negentropy on December 1, 2009 at 11:41 AM
Just wait until the real tax increases kick in…
myrenovations on December 1, 2009 at 11:41 AM
It means that 29% refuse to give in to their intrinsic racism.
Jim Treacher on December 1, 2009 at 11:41 AM
Dick Morris predicted last night that the R’s will win back both houses of Congress next year.
I believe that one contributing factor to the anger is a lack of balance in our current federal government. It is so heavily tilted left, going against the grain of the nation, that voter anger and populist passion is necessary as a means to achieve some degree of balance. I anticipate that once Obama’s party is used to clean the floor next year, a sense of balance will be restored and the president will be really pushed around for his final 2yrs in office before he is promoted to secretary general of the UN, the position he currently covets.
ted c on December 1, 2009 at 11:42 AM
Raaaaaaacists… obviously!
red winger on December 1, 2009 at 11:42 AM
It means America is working as it is supposed to. The idea that a behemoth the size of the Federal Government should be well liked is ridiculous. Nobody likes bureaucrats.
The 71% is the same as Bushes 29% approval rating. It’s a certain percentage of of the ruling party, Democrats in this case, and the rest of the country. Republicans are willing to take their leader to task so laid it directly on Bush. The Democrats are cultists so it’s not Dear Leader’s fault…but the “government”.
Rocks on December 1, 2009 at 11:42 AM
Nancy Pelosi has been like that kid on Home Alone. She’s finally allowed to do whatever she wants, and can’t restrain herself.
ColumbusConservative on December 1, 2009 at 11:43 AM
No, I think myrenovations is correct. Wait till the “obama” taxes kick in…. it is going to be like cows lined up for the slaughter.
upinak on December 1, 2009 at 11:43 AM
What does it mean? To this administration?…..NOTHING, NADDA, ZILCHE, GOOSE EGG, ZERO…..
CynicalOptimist on December 1, 2009 at 11:43 AM
We have every right to be angry. We have a Congress that is not listening to their constituents and a President who is not listening to the American people. Oh, I forget their democrats thereore they know what is best, I say throw them all out of office, is all they want to do is sit in Washington and feather their own nest and to hell with the American people. What a bunch of crooks.
ArthurJ on December 1, 2009 at 11:44 AM
I liked it the first time I heard it, I like it now, too.
:-)
Abby Adams on December 1, 2009 at 11:44 AM
I am 48 yo so I’m in the angriest DEMO. Just because I’m red-hot furious doesn’t mean I’m going to throw out every incumbent I can. It only means I’m going to throw out the ones that are making me miserable (the DEMS).
I can see the ultra-lefties being mad because BHO’s not radical enough and I can see the moderate DEMS and independents being mad too.
I mean, who thought they were voting for what we’ve got!?
Oink on December 1, 2009 at 11:46 AM
Prediction:
The New York Times, WAPO and David Frum will blame this anger on Glenn Beck.
Knucklehead on December 1, 2009 at 11:46 AM
Forget second American Revolution… Think second French Revolution?
kurtzz3 on December 1, 2009 at 11:47 AM
And when they pass healthcare, look for that number to go up to about 80% or so, which the remaining 20% will comprise the far left wing crazies.I was shocked to hear Morris say last night that the GOP can take back the senate. Morris has been way off w/ predictions before, but he listed the 9-10 senators who are vulnerable and hearing the list, each one made sense and could happen.
davek70 on December 1, 2009 at 11:48 AM
A leader must be led by those he leads. Otherwise he leads blindly.
FontanaConservative on December 1, 2009 at 11:48 AM
Dude.
Jim Treacher on December 1, 2009 at 11:49 AM
Let them eat arugula! Where are our Trolls to tell us that 71 % of Americans don’t know what’s good for them?
kingsjester on December 1, 2009 at 11:49 AM
Sounds like a win-win to me, angry voters staying home for the wrong reason and angry voters voting for the right reason.
fourdeucer on December 1, 2009 at 11:50 AM
71% is a pretty high number. High enough number to now start asking:
What do they intend to do about it? The average voter seems to feel very disenfranchised – and feel that since their government won’t listen – what do they do?
In a situation like this, it seems to me that a person feeling powerless will lash out at any available target that acts as proxy recipient of their anger for government.
What would these be?
1. Their 2010 vote.
2. Census workers.
3. Local representatives of the federal government.
4. Any federal intrusion on their daily lives – regulations, etc.
I’m sure there are better examples but I can’t yet think of them
Anything/anyone within the reach of the angry voters: BEWARE
cane_loader on December 1, 2009 at 11:50 AM
I thought initially that the guy was nutz or just trying to be provocative(which I’m sure he was), but when he described the Senate races, I realized he was right.
6 or 7 races look like they heavily favor the GOP. From there they would need to pick off a few more like California and Illinois, but it’s definitely doable. And I’ve long believed that retaking the House was possible.
Doughboy on December 1, 2009 at 11:50 AM
No, there are some within our population who are more susceptible to the long term effects of koolaid inebriation. It may interact with methadone or crack to prolong the effect of the koolaid, but the end result is that those 29% aren’t awake quite yet. But, just like any other resource, crack and methadone may eventually become scarce and those 29% will wake up and be REALLY pissed.
ted c on December 1, 2009 at 11:51 AM
What if the percentage of Democrat voters who did not count on the agenda being this progressive outweighs those who want the statist takeover?
That would be encouraging to me beyond measure.
Return of the Reagan Democrats: This time it’s personal!
Brian1972 on December 1, 2009 at 11:52 AM
Anger leads to hate…I can feel the power of Darth Cheney at work.
WashJeff on December 1, 2009 at 11:52 AM
LIVID! The loathing I feel for this Congress and this administration just about chokes me. They are vile and exactly what I expected them to be. The word amatuer will be such a cliche by the end of this incompetent, stupifying narcissists’ tenure. Oh America, what have you done?
JAM on December 1, 2009 at 11:54 AM
If this trend continues, we may see an electoral wipeout next November.
i like the sound of that.
SHARPTOOTH on December 1, 2009 at 11:54 AM
And yet it won’t stop the Statists from Rahming though legislation to control the lives of every last one of us – better known as Obowmacare
Juno77 on December 1, 2009 at 11:55 AM
Added about another $10 trillion in debt for pretty much nothing except his home boys.
Johnnyreb on December 1, 2009 at 11:55 AM
From Mr. Morrissey on 11-30-09
fourdeucer on December 1, 2009 at 11:57 AM
send them packing along with the bill for all the damage they’ve done.
ted c on December 1, 2009 at 11:57 AM
Rasmussen should have been more specific than nebulous federal government comprised of individual politicians. Are they most angry with Pelosi, Reid, or Zero? When the public is angry with the players of a Democrat majority then Rasmussen should feel a need to diffuse specific targets of anger into something generic as federal government.
viking01 on December 1, 2009 at 11:58 AM
And therin lies the problem and in no way a bash towards you. But how many people sit around thinking “my Congress Critter is just great, but it’s the other one’s who need to go?”
They are all career, scum sucking bottom feeders and they all need to go. None of them have clean hands, they are all dirty once they get to Washington.
Term Limits. Start at the local level too!
Knucklehead on December 1, 2009 at 11:58 AM
(adds virtual question mark to last sentence of my post)
viking01 on December 1, 2009 at 11:59 AM
I’m pretty angry at the government, then again I’m the type of person to swear constantly at other drivers when I’m on the road.
Bishop on December 1, 2009 at 12:00 PM
Being a self employed worker bee in CA, I have plenty to be angry about. I have no union, no pension, no expense account, no golden parachute, I don’t even have unemployment benefits to protect me — All I get is a tax bill that hits me like a club every April. I keep paying and paying and all I see are teachers unions or government cubical worker unions negotiating fat retirement packages and gilded health care plans. They have enough cash to pay huge sums to politicians who live in candyland giving huge government contracts to their friends in exchange for more donations. And all that money comes from dopes like me.
I thought those who worked for gov. were dopes. They will be living the life of Riley from 55 until death on my dime, while I’ll need to work until I’m 75 just to sustain me and my family. Now I feel like I’m the dope. They have a license to steal.
tommylotto on December 1, 2009 at 12:00 PM
It’s all the OBAMANOPOLY MONEY being spent!!!!!
DamnYankee on December 1, 2009 at 12:00 PM
it means throw all the bums out in ’10!
Ohyah! it will be epic
ginaswo on December 1, 2009 at 12:00 PM
See how much damage Boosh did? People still hate the government even a year into Oba One Kanhopi’s glorious reign of rainbows and unicorns. Poor guy, he’ll be voted out in 2012 as voters continue to be angry at Bush and take it out on him instead.
Sharke on December 1, 2009 at 12:01 PM
yeah everyone always says its the other guys critters that are the problem but not This time
This time all the peeps have been calling and writing and emailing their critters and saying no no no
and they are being ignored
they wont be ignored Dan!
ginaswo on December 1, 2009 at 12:01 PM
I think the next crop of congress critters ought to be sent to DC with wrecking balls and axes and instruction to not come back until they’ve wrecked enough programs and pork to save $1. One TRUE thin dollar. Once they’ve done that, let ‘em come back home, spend the night, then get back up to DC the next day with the instructions to save $2.
No parties, no cocktails, no interns, no flights.
That’s representation.
ted c on December 1, 2009 at 12:01 PM
You want to see narcissist? Wait til tonight’s press conference. It will be all about him succeeding, not our troops.
ColumbusConservative on December 1, 2009 at 12:02 PM
You say you want a revolution
Well, you know
We all want to change the world
You tell me that it’s evolution
Well, you know
We all want to change the world
But when you talk about destruction
Don’t you know that you can count me out
Don’t you know it’s gonna be all right
all right, all right
You say you got a real solution
Well, you know
We’d all love to see the plan
You ask me for a contribution
Well, you know
We’re doing what we can
But when you want money
for people with minds that hate
All I can tell is brother you have to wait
Don’t you know it’s gonna be all right
all right, all right
Ah
ah, ah, ah, ah, ah…
You say you’ll change the constitution
Well, you know
We all want to change your head
You tell me it’s the institution
Well, you know
You better free you mind instead
But if you go carrying pictures of chairman Mao
You ain’t going to make it with anyone anyhow
Don’t you know it’s gonna be all right
all right, all right
all right, all right, all right
all right, all right, all right
Wolftech on December 1, 2009 at 12:02 PM
Politically speaking, I hope there’s a lot of incumbent blood on the floor next November. I have spent the last year in a state of mixed fear and fury, and you can bet I will be at the polls in 2010, along with every family member of voting age that I can drag along. With any luck, the Dems will be out of power for a generation, and a lot of bewildered RINO Republicans will be asking “What happened?” the day after the elections.
hachiban on December 1, 2009 at 12:02 PM
40 y/o bitter clingy Catholic middle class white woman here
boy am I mad
If only i could vote multiple times but that is ACORNs bag
ginaswo on December 1, 2009 at 12:03 PM
And 29% are people who do not pay any attention to politics.
If you are not angry… you are not paying attention.
Romeo13 on December 1, 2009 at 12:05 PM
I wonder when the political violence will begin.
radioboyatl on December 1, 2009 at 12:05 PM
If he stand up there in front of our best and brightest tonight talking about exit ramps, that 71 % is going to rise.
kingsjester on December 1, 2009 at 12:06 PM
stand=stands
kingsjester on December 1, 2009 at 12:07 PM
Expect the “temper tantrum” meme to be dusted off by the MSM to explain why Obama and the Dems get their *sses handed to them a la Clinton and the Dems in 1994.
teke184 on December 1, 2009 at 12:07 PM
Hmmm…. with these numbers???
A National “Throw all the Bums Out!” movement?
If incumbents ran… it would switch the parties in power… you’d gain many more Conservative type seats, than Lib seats (notice, I did not say Rep or Dem).
Romeo13 on December 1, 2009 at 12:07 PM
“Throw the bums out!”
Mr_Magoo on December 1, 2009 at 12:08 PM
Michele Bachman isn’t going anywhere so if you don’t like her, too bad.
Bishop on December 1, 2009 at 12:08 PM
Will the next HOWARD BEALE please stand up????
DamnYankee on December 1, 2009 at 12:10 PM
That was from the portion posted in the Headlines section.
Can someone define Political Class, and, Mainstream or populist to me? I think I know what they mean, but I want to make sure they mean what I think they mean.
Just A Grunt on December 1, 2009 at 12:13 PM
That has already begun. But when will people fight back.
the_nile on December 1, 2009 at 12:16 PM
TerminatorSaracuda: Salvation“The Future Begins”
Released today.
All grown up in post-apocalyptic 2008, Saracuda (Sarah Palin) must lead the resistance of humans against the increasingly dominating Obama-robots in this fourth installment of the popular action-packed Saracuda series. But when The Plan (Glenn Beck) appears, his existence confuses the mission as Sarah tries to determine whether Beck has come from the future or the past — and whether he’s friend or foe.
Mr_Magoo on December 1, 2009 at 12:18 PM
Obama and the Democrats ran on a platform of tax cuts and fiscal restraint. Oh, and that the Republicans were controlling the hated 2006-8 Congress.
So the independents said that sounds good an voted for the Democrats.
Well, now they find the crooks they wanted to vote out in 2008 are stronger and greedier then ever. Those tax cuts are about to become tax increases. And Obama will add more to the deficit in two years then Bush did his whole term.
The only question is, why aren’t all of the independents “very angry”? They were had.
18-1 on December 1, 2009 at 12:20 PM
I for one will be doing my part to ensure that all of our local and national elected officials get an opportunity to participate in career counseling.
Dukehoopsfan on December 1, 2009 at 12:23 PM
I am in the angriest demographic as well. This poll really lifts my spirits. It sickens me, phyiscally ill, to think what is being done to my country and that my children will never know true freedom if this train wreck is not stopped.
I am thrilled that there is anger out there. There needs to be anger, real serious anger.
ORconservative on December 1, 2009 at 12:24 PM
Ha ha. Young people are collectively too stupid/ignorant to very angry yet.
You can easily pick out the welfare/dependent class in the survey.
And age group (40s) is PO’d so badly bcs we cannot get ahead no matter how hard we try or work.
We are so screwed.
I’d say that’s a darned good reason for being really angry.
Badger40 on December 1, 2009 at 12:29 PM
Spoke with my sis by phone this past weekend and she said she said she was “scared for our country, our standing in the world community and for our national security” the way everyone is just “waltzing in and out of the White House like the President is just one of the guys” and how he has “acted un-Presidential around the world.”
Pretty sure she voted for him and I would consider her an independent.
The tide is turning, my friends. Lots of people realizing elections do indeed have consequences – just not the ones they expected.
Mr_Magoo on December 1, 2009 at 12:34 PM
she said
she saidMr_Magoo on December 1, 2009 at 12:35 PM
Like Reid and Pelosi give a flying flaming rat’s patootie in space what we think of them! These two are so locked up in their own hermetically-sealed universes that they are now totally oblivious to the fact that their actions in Washington are pretty much sealing their own political fates.
If there were any prime examples of absolute power corrupting absolutely, look no further than Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi as living testaments of that.
pilamaye on December 1, 2009 at 12:39 PM
did I say something wrong… because I am too tired to really want to go on other then a nap.
upinak on December 1, 2009 at 12:39 PM
Put me down in the “very angry” category. A year or so I would only have been “angry,” but I’ve definitely upped the threat level in the last ten months or so.
Bob's Kid on December 1, 2009 at 12:41 PM
mountainmanbob is PIG-BITING MAD!
mountainmanbob on December 1, 2009 at 12:47 PM
Under 40, female and SEETHING.
My teen is also mad, and will be able to VOTE in 2012.
We’ve got our soap box here, in Nov. we’ll use the ballot box and hopefully no other box will be required to guarantee our liberties.
Firefly_76 on December 1, 2009 at 12:47 PM
Only 71% are angry at the Government? Has it gone down, or, are the Happy Ones those that had an extra heavy dose of the Hope and Change Kool-Aid?
DL13 on December 1, 2009 at 12:51 PM
How about Blood-drinkin’ Angry? That’s where I’m at.
TXUS on December 1, 2009 at 12:53 PM
Dems who are angry at the Democrats for not passing Obama’s agenda, are not likely to go out and support those same Democrats in Nov. On the other hand, if they are represented by a Republican, they might be more likely to go out and vote.
For Rep voters, the Republican party has, for once, pretty much held tight (thanks a lot Maine /sarc), so there are likely to be a lot fewer Republican voters who are mad at Republican incumbants.
Red districts stay red.
Many purple districts go red.
Blue districts had better start kicking in the constituent service to try and ingratiate themselves with their voters before Nov.
MarkTheGreat on December 1, 2009 at 12:54 PM
The other 29% are the ones that pay NO income tax! But, I guess the other 11% are afraid they will have to pay for their HC!
xler8bmw on December 1, 2009 at 12:55 PM
its times likes this i wish i didn’t live in nyc. Sometimes i just stop in the street for a second and get really angry and dream about doing some very bad things to these goddamn liberals all around me
Chiasmos on December 1, 2009 at 1:05 PM
Maybe I have been slow to reach this point, but I now consider the federal government to be my number on enemy, whose goal it is to destroy me, my family, and our values. Immediately below the feds is the state government, themselves closely followed by the environmental flamers who have caused the destruction of some of the world’s best farm land in California.
GaltBlvnAtty on December 1, 2009 at 1:06 PM
The next election is going to be all about who supported Obamanomics and who didn’t.
Even Democrat candidates will be doing everything they possibly can to claim they were against the bailout and takeovers. As crazy as that sounds, it will actually work in some cases. But that’s one of those “some of the people, some of the time” things.
2010 is going to be a bloodbath for the Democrats. But getting a bunch of R’s in front of the names of the interchangeable dorks in Congress won’t help anything. We need not just enough Republicans, but enough REAL CONSERVATIVES in Congress to undo everything the liberals have done, and override Presidential vetoes on every bill.
logis on December 1, 2009 at 1:08 PM
I’m ready!
cmsinaz on December 1, 2009 at 1:10 PM
Absolutely, we need to pay attention to the primary battles now, and not wait until the second half of 2010. Although I don’t think mathematically it is possible to get a supermajority, even of RINOs.
Firefly_76 on December 1, 2009 at 1:11 PM
In a Rasmussen poll, “Political Class” and “Mainstream” have very specific meanings. Rasmussen asks three questions:
1) Generally speaking, when it comes to important national issues, whose judgment do you trust more – the American people or America’s political leaders?
2) Some people believe that the federal government has become a special interest group that looks out primarily for its own interests. Has the federal government become a special interest group?
3) Do government and big business often work together in ways that hurt consumers and investors?
Score +1 point for “the people” or “yes,” -1 point for “the leaders” or “no,” and 0 points for “don’t know.” Final score +2 makes you Mainstream, final score -2 makes you Political Class.
Fabozz on December 1, 2009 at 1:21 PM
The 46% that are real angry have already sharpened their pitchforks and fueled up their torches.
They are just waiting for the right time to make their voices and will heard by the obfuscating dolts inside the beltway.
belad on December 1, 2009 at 1:31 PM
He will never be the secretary general, the secretary general is always someone from a third world country that hates America….Oh, never mind.
belad on December 1, 2009 at 1:33 PM
Welcome to the Dark side. LMAO
nyx on December 1, 2009 at 1:35 PM
Finally! I have faith in us youngsters again!
nyx on December 1, 2009 at 1:38 PM
It’s always possible in the House.
In the Senate it’s not possible to get a super majority of Republicans. However, if the wipe out is bad enough, those up for election in 2012 will be more willing to compromise.
MarkTheGreat on December 1, 2009 at 1:55 PM
This story states that more men than women are mad. I find that ironic since many of my friends are very very angry, including myself. A revolution is a brewing.
margretto on December 1, 2009 at 1:59 PM
They still aren’t listening. When I recently told my Republican Representative how angry I was and that there were many more people who were angry just like me, he basically patted me on the head and told me that people can’t get anywhere by being angry. My response was, “just watch”.
yoda on December 1, 2009 at 1:59 PM
This Poll actually makes me feel less Happy while Angry.
barnone on December 1, 2009 at 2:09 PM
I have a hard time believing that the marxist that are in control are going to give up their power do to an election.
I will be surprised if there is not some type of “emergency” that disrupts our normal democratic process.
These scum play for keeps, and they will not hand over the keys without a fight.
jsunrise on December 1, 2009 at 2:09 PM
The longer these scoundrels stay in office the better off we will be. Yamamoto warned before Pearl Harbor that they were only going to wake a sleeping giant.
LarryG on December 1, 2009 at 2:37 PM
Gettin ready for a A$$ whooping them donkey heads
bluegrass on December 1, 2009 at 2:41 PM
I saw Dick Morris on Fox News yesterday and he was saying the GOP has a good chance of taking the House back and getting 6-10 Senate seats.
If the Dems don’t show up much at the polls, it will happen.
It will be interesting if one of the rallying cries will be “Repeal Government Healthcare”.
Sapwolf on December 1, 2009 at 3:13 PM
Any attempt by the Dems to postpone the election will trigger a shooting war and riots.
Ain’t gonna happen.
Sapwolf on December 1, 2009 at 3:15 PM
But, but they keep saying they have a “consensus”. If that consensus is absolute anger, they are correct. (that’s the part the Gov forgot to add)
elclynn on December 1, 2009 at 3:43 PM
I am in CNN news hell. I am in a cruise ship in the middle of the ocean with only CNN for news. Gawd I miss FoxNews Channel.
Which Dems did Morris list as vulnerable?
karenhasfreedom on December 1, 2009 at 4:21 PM
Also at Rasmussen Reports today, party identification is 36/33/31, D/R/I. The last time ABC News – Washington Post did a poll, they selected a sample with 35/21/39% D/R/I, and 5% other. I wonder why ABC – WaPo would skew their sampling this way?
motionview on December 1, 2009 at 4:46 PM
From the strange, strange land called Wisconsin, where the paradoxical people b#$ch about high taxes and yet vote the liberals in.
In Milwaukee, we need SOME BODY to run against Feingold and Kohl…they will continue to vote for Obama until they fear that the people here have a choice.
ANY CONSERVATIVE out there want to run in Milwaukee for Senate? Anyone?
JimmyGee on December 1, 2009 at 7:37 PM
I keep saying—TWO CYCLES-NO INCUMBENTS.When you keep getting the same cards, shuffle the deck twice next time.
Many people are saying”No incumbents”,but if you’re only willing to do it once,don’t bother doing it at all.Throw them ALL out ,and when the freshmen come up for re-election,throw them out.
We have all heard the old saw about how experience is so important for efficient operation of government.We have what is possibly the most”experienced” government ever with so many career politicians in office,and how efficient are they?
Let them know that we do not accept their BS,and if they want the office they have to earn it everyday,just like a REAL working person.The only way the people who want to run for public office will understand that is for them to see that incumbency is not an advantage,productivity is.
Experience is the best teacher and now is the time for our wannabe statesmen to experience the results of taking the voters for granted.
TWO CYCLES—NO INCUMBENTS
DDT on December 1, 2009 at 9:23 PM