<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Secret Service will tighten WH security after party crashers scandal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 02:43:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Official Obama Administration Scandals List - Page 18 851-900 &#124; Conservative American</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-3232243</link>
		<dc:creator>Official Obama Administration Scandals List - Page 18 851-900 &#124; Conservative American</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 22:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-3232243</guid>
		<description>[...] CBS News anchor Katie Couric. Who&#8217;s in charge of keeping the President safe?! UPDATE 12/1/9: Ed Morrisey at Hot Air thinks someone high up let this couple in and the Secret Service is being tossed under the bus! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CBS News anchor Katie Couric. Who&#8217;s in charge of keeping the President safe?! UPDATE 12/1/9: Ed Morrisey at Hot Air thinks someone high up let this couple in and the Secret Service is being tossed under the bus! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Official Obama Administration Scandals List - Page 17 801-850 &#124; Conservative American</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-3003784</link>
		<dc:creator>Official Obama Administration Scandals List - Page 17 801-850 &#124; Conservative American</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-3003784</guid>
		<description>[...] CBS News anchor Katie Couric. Who&#8217;s in charge of keeping the President safe?! UPDATE 12/1/9: Ed Morrisey at Hot Air thinks someone high up let this couple in and the Secret Service is being tossed under the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CBS News anchor Katie Couric. Who&#8217;s in charge of keeping the President safe?! UPDATE 12/1/9: Ed Morrisey at Hot Air thinks someone high up let this couple in and the Secret Service is being tossed under the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lourdes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-3001364</link>
		<dc:creator>Lourdes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-3001364</guid>
		<description>Look at that Happy Obama, laughing, smiling, reaching out to touch hands and arms and more with the two Crashers.

That is not a &quot;concerned&quot; guy.  

Whatever &quot;concern&quot; Obama&#039;s later developed such that there&#039;s now a need for &quot;increased security,&quot; Obama appears to have developed in retrograde.  &#039;Cause he sure wasn&#039;t &quot;concerned&quot; during the mingling with the two Crashers...who HE KNEW already.

Mr. Clueless didn&#039;t think to stop and ask any security person or even Associate AT the Dinner why these two Crashers were there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at that Happy Obama, laughing, smiling, reaching out to touch hands and arms and more with the two Crashers.</p>
<p>That is not a &#8220;concerned&#8221; guy.  </p>
<p>Whatever &#8220;concern&#8221; Obama&#8217;s later developed such that there&#8217;s now a need for &#8220;increased security,&#8221; Obama appears to have developed in retrograde.  &#8216;Cause he sure wasn&#8217;t &#8220;concerned&#8221; during the mingling with the two Crashers&#8230;who HE KNEW already.</p>
<p>Mr. Clueless didn&#8217;t think to stop and ask any security person or even Associate AT the Dinner why these two Crashers were there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnyU</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-3000804</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnyU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-3000804</guid>
		<description>GateCrasher CasherGate.  goodness sakes.  I think our boy let some things slide so some of his other buddies could come in the back door too. Who else does he let in, hmmmm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GateCrasher CasherGate.  goodness sakes.  I think our boy let some things slide so some of his other buddies could come in the back door too. Who else does he let in, hmmmm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: journeyintothewhirlwind</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-3000641</link>
		<dc:creator>journeyintothewhirlwind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 05:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-3000641</guid>
		<description>From Fox News:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Representatives from the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation say the couple also attended their recent awards dinner without an invitation, and multiple sources told MyFoxDC.com they snuck in to the event through an entrance meant for bus boys and caterers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And it goes on to say they were escorted out by security. Since Obama was at that dinner I am assuming that Secret Service was there also and that they were in the loop as regards the Salehis &quot;crashing&quot; the party. So what is up? 

There is a connection between this couple and Khalidi who is a known PLO persona and a connection between Khalidi and Mr Obama. Could these &quot;party crashers&quot; actually be messengers between the PLO and Obama? The way she grips Obama&#039;s hand in the picture is interesting- the one underneath could have something in it and the one on top is used for cover. The other thing that strikes me about the picture is how tense her arm is and we know now that she has met Obama before so I would think she would be more relaxed. I would love to see the next minute or so of tape- does Obama drop his hand and then put something in his pants pocket or maybe he retrieves a handkerchief from his suitcoat. 

Just musings from someone who needs to go to bed now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Fox News:</p>
<blockquote><p>Representatives from the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation say the couple also attended their recent awards dinner without an invitation, and multiple sources told MyFoxDC.com they snuck in to the event through an entrance meant for bus boys and caterers.</p></blockquote>
<p>And it goes on to say they were escorted out by security. Since Obama was at that dinner I am assuming that Secret Service was there also and that they were in the loop as regards the Salehis &#8220;crashing&#8221; the party. So what is up? </p>
<p>There is a connection between this couple and Khalidi who is a known PLO persona and a connection between Khalidi and Mr Obama. Could these &#8220;party crashers&#8221; actually be messengers between the PLO and Obama? The way she grips Obama&#8217;s hand in the picture is interesting- the one underneath could have something in it and the one on top is used for cover. The other thing that strikes me about the picture is how tense her arm is and we know now that she has met Obama before so I would think she would be more relaxed. I would love to see the next minute or so of tape- does Obama drop his hand and then put something in his pants pocket or maybe he retrieves a handkerchief from his suitcoat. </p>
<p>Just musings from someone who needs to go to bed now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macncheez</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-2999951</link>
		<dc:creator>macncheez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-2999951</guid>
		<description>They used the magic words to get near Obama:

Allah-o-Akbar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They used the magic words to get near Obama:</p>
<p>Allah-o-Akbar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khun Joe</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-2999862</link>
		<dc:creator>Khun Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-2999862</guid>
		<description>I would laugh at this &quot;CrasherGate&quot; situation if it wasn&#039;t so dangerous...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would laugh at this &#8220;CrasherGate&#8221; situation if it wasn&#8217;t so dangerous&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BL@KBIRD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-2999598</link>
		<dc:creator>BL@KBIRD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-2999598</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;“Rather than stand there and get wet, he went ahead and let them go,” &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I would imagine the Muslim sounding name was the door opener. Especially when Tarek shouted, &quot;lets get this diversity party started!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“Rather than stand there and get wet, he went ahead and let them go,” </p></blockquote>
<p>I would imagine the Muslim sounding name was the door opener. Especially when Tarek shouted, &#8220;lets get this diversity party started!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onlineanalyst</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-2999271</link>
		<dc:creator>onlineanalyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-2999271</guid>
		<description>This whole brouhaha re the Salahis smells beyond words, and the ObaMaos are not averse to dumping on the Secret Service. 

Former press secretary for W Bush claims that the ObaMaos wanted to lessen the protocol strictures on security for the White House admissions when they assumed power. The WH social secretary, Desiree Rodgers (Michelle Obama&#039;s friend(, was supposed to be at the entrance area vetting incoming guests. Instead, she was partying with the guests. 

The Secret Service will be the fall guys for this blunder (because the ObaMaos are &quot;circling the wagons&quot; in protecting Desiree Rodgers). 

These people did not belong in a party tent. They belong in a barn...for their disregard of protocol and security. At the same time, they squeal about the number of threats against the Boy King.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole brouhaha re the Salahis smells beyond words, and the ObaMaos are not averse to dumping on the Secret Service. </p>
<p>Former press secretary for W Bush claims that the ObaMaos wanted to lessen the protocol strictures on security for the White House admissions when they assumed power. The WH social secretary, Desiree Rodgers (Michelle Obama&#8217;s friend(, was supposed to be at the entrance area vetting incoming guests. Instead, she was partying with the guests. </p>
<p>The Secret Service will be the fall guys for this blunder (because the ObaMaos are &#8220;circling the wagons&#8221; in protecting Desiree Rodgers). </p>
<p>These people did not belong in a party tent. They belong in a barn&#8230;for their disregard of protocol and security. At the same time, they squeal about the number of threats against the Boy King.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-2999210</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-2999210</guid>
		<description>Of course they were &quot;invited.&quot; Obama just forgot to tell them not to plaster the thing all over Facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course they were &#8220;invited.&#8221; Obama just forgot to tell them not to plaster the thing all over Facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maverick muse</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-2999083</link>
		<dc:creator>maverick muse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-2999083</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right, Kessler. I listened to several of his stump speeches promoting his book. He kept on his script pretty consistently, but spilled some beans late night with George Noory. Ha! You gotta love it when the host actually asks good questions.

It wasn&#039;t that Obama is more threatened by outside threats; only that Obama, Inc. are all indebted to so many outsiders who paid to be insiders, that when these special lobbyists show up to collect their photo op, the incompetent Obama administration coerces the security agents into letting go of the security measures that are in place. 

Exceptional threats to security are based from within this administration as this particular odd couple has PLO ties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right, Kessler. I listened to several of his stump speeches promoting his book. He kept on his script pretty consistently, but spilled some beans late night with George Noory. Ha! You gotta love it when the host actually asks good questions.</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t that Obama is more threatened by outside threats; only that Obama, Inc. are all indebted to so many outsiders who paid to be insiders, that when these special lobbyists show up to collect their photo op, the incompetent Obama administration coerces the security agents into letting go of the security measures that are in place. </p>
<p>Exceptional threats to security are based from within this administration as this particular odd couple has PLO ties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maverick muse</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-2999037</link>
		<dc:creator>maverick muse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-2999037</guid>
		<description>chicagojedi on November 30, 2009 at 4:28 PM

Precisely.

The secret service &quot;tell all&quot; book (released the other month) made this point: that the POLITICIANS are the ones setting PROTOCOL absolutely against the advice that the Secret Service gives to the President. The case that author used as his most blatant example regarded security measures at entrances to where the President will be in attendance. As soon as it&#039;s time for the meeting to get started, the politicians order their secret service to stand down and allow everyone in to take their seats in time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chicagojedi on November 30, 2009 at 4:28 PM</p>
<p>Precisely.</p>
<p>The secret service &#8220;tell all&#8221; book (released the other month) made this point: that the POLITICIANS are the ones setting PROTOCOL absolutely against the advice that the Secret Service gives to the President. The case that author used as his most blatant example regarded security measures at entrances to where the President will be in attendance. As soon as it&#8217;s time for the meeting to get started, the politicians order their secret service to stand down and allow everyone in to take their seats in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macncheez</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-2999027</link>
		<dc:creator>macncheez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-2999027</guid>
		<description>Speaking of  the show &quot;Real Housewives of DC&quot;
does Michelle Obama qualify to be  star of the show?

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Someone ordered them to. And that someone had to be fairly high up.

chicagojedi on November 30, 2009 at 4:28 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of  the show &#8220;Real Housewives of DC&#8221;<br />
does Michelle Obama qualify to be  star of the show?</p>
<blockquote><p>
Someone ordered them to. And that someone had to be fairly high up.</p>
<p>chicagojedi on November 30, 2009 at 4:28 PM</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ranger549</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-2999024</link>
		<dc:creator>ranger549</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-2999024</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t read all the comments but it seems that Tareq and Michaele Salahi have the same M.O. as The One!! They&#039;re everywhere! They&#039;re everywhere! There&#039;s a photo op for even the peasants!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read all the comments but it seems that Tareq and Michaele Salahi have the same M.O. as The One!! They&#8217;re everywhere! They&#8217;re everywhere! There&#8217;s a photo op for even the peasants!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chicagojedi</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-2999017</link>
		<dc:creator>chicagojedi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-2999017</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still waiting to find out who ordered the Secret Service to let them in. somebody had to clear them. It&#039;s still a huge black eye for the Secret Service, but I cannot see how they let anyone in without clearing them. Someone ordered them to. And that someone had to be fairly high up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still waiting to find out who ordered the Secret Service to let them in. somebody had to clear them. It&#8217;s still a huge black eye for the Secret Service, but I cannot see how they let anyone in without clearing them. Someone ordered them to. And that someone had to be fairly high up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right2bright</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-2998945</link>
		<dc:creator>right2bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-2998945</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On the contrary I’m the only person here who actually has provided any proof for my assertions.

crr6 on November 30, 2009 at 11:19 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Wrong, my statement that I posted was just as valid, with just as many links and supporting evidence as your quote gave.
Obama is the least threatened president in modern history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On the contrary I’m the only person here who actually has provided any proof for my assertions.</p>
<p>crr6 on November 30, 2009 at 11:19 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Wrong, my statement that I posted was just as valid, with just as many links and supporting evidence as your quote gave.<br />
Obama is the least threatened president in modern history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinner Crashers&#8230; &#171; PachydermsBlog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-2998943</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinner Crashers&#8230; &#171; PachydermsBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-2998943</guid>
		<description>[...] that it&#8217;s not the whole story.  That&#8217;s right, kids&#8230;  the White House Gatecrashers are&#8230;   long term Obama [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that it&#8217;s not the whole story.  That&#8217;s right, kids&#8230;  the White House Gatecrashers are&#8230;   long term Obama [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nalea</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-2998930</link>
		<dc:creator>Nalea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-2998930</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Another Obama lie and cover up. I don’t know who or why , but somebody within the administration cleared these people in , somebody pretty high up . The Secret Service is being made the fall guy .
borntoraisehogs on November 30, 2009 at 11:31 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

BINGO! What people do not understand is--this administration wants to take down everything that we respect about government-CIA, Secret Service, armed forces, our judicial system, ad infinitum...(whatever is left that we do respect). Remember Bo&#039;s word&#039;s when he said, &quot;We are just days away from fundamentally transforming this government. This is what they intend to do, in spite of what everyone thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Another Obama lie and cover up. I don’t know who or why , but somebody within the administration cleared these people in , somebody pretty high up . The Secret Service is being made the fall guy .<br />
borntoraisehogs on November 30, 2009 at 11:31 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>BINGO! What people do not understand is&#8211;this administration wants to take down everything that we respect about government-CIA, Secret Service, armed forces, our judicial system, ad infinitum&#8230;(whatever is left that we do respect). Remember Bo&#8217;s word&#8217;s when he said, &#8220;We are just days away from fundamentally transforming this government. This is what they intend to do, in spite of what everyone thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UltimateBob</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-2998890</link>
		<dc:creator>UltimateBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-2998890</guid>
		<description>What a wasted opportunity.  These two people to go all that trouble to get through security and come face to face with Hussein, and didn&#039;t take the opportunity to b!tchslap him across the head.  Shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a wasted opportunity.  These two people to go all that trouble to get through security and come face to face with Hussein, and didn&#8217;t take the opportunity to b!tchslap him across the head.  Shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BHO Jonestown</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-2998868</link>
		<dc:creator>BHO Jonestown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-2998868</guid>
		<description>Hell, let &#039;em all in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell, let &#8216;em all in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capitalist piglet</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-2998775</link>
		<dc:creator>capitalist piglet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-2998775</guid>
		<description>I noticed in the photo of Obama talking to these two at the dinner that he looked very relaxed and at ease...but I figured he had no reason to believe anyone was there to do harm, and was just welcoming strangers.

Now I see he has been photographed with these two before, and that they are apparently acquainted with Rashid Khalidi.

This article by Washington Post writers says they were at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.philly.com/inquirer/front_page/78007967.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;inauguration&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;em&gt;Before Tareq and Michaele Salahi catapulted to international notoriety as possible White House gate-crashers last week, the Virginia socialites had their pictures taken with President Obama during his inauguration, Prince Charles at a polo match, and Oprah Winfrey at another event. They had Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy speak at their elaborate wedding, which more than 1,800 guests attended.&lt;/em&gt;

Who are these people really? Lots of people went to the inauguration, but most of them were not photographed with Obama I would assume. I&#039;m really beginning to think there&#039;s more to this than meets the eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed in the photo of Obama talking to these two at the dinner that he looked very relaxed and at ease&#8230;but I figured he had no reason to believe anyone was there to do harm, and was just welcoming strangers.</p>
<p>Now I see he has been photographed with these two before, and that they are apparently acquainted with Rashid Khalidi.</p>
<p>This article by Washington Post writers says they were at the <a href="http://www.philly.com/inquirer/front_page/78007967.html" rel="nofollow">inauguration</a>:</p>
<p><em>Before Tareq and Michaele Salahi catapulted to international notoriety as possible White House gate-crashers last week, the Virginia socialites had their pictures taken with President Obama during his inauguration, Prince Charles at a polo match, and Oprah Winfrey at another event. They had Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy speak at their elaborate wedding, which more than 1,800 guests attended.</em></p>
<p>Who are these people really? Lots of people went to the inauguration, but most of them were not photographed with Obama I would assume. I&#8217;m really beginning to think there&#8217;s more to this than meets the eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogsoldier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-2998708</link>
		<dc:creator>dogsoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-2998708</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;macncheez on November 30, 2009 at 1:57 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, and the stain of that lapse cannot be removed. Even firing the guards and or staffers that allowed this to transpire will not &quot;fix&quot; the error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>macncheez on November 30, 2009 at 1:57 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, and the stain of that lapse cannot be removed. Even firing the guards and or staffers that allowed this to transpire will not &#8220;fix&#8221; the error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura in Maryland</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-2998688</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura in Maryland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-2998688</guid>
		<description>Did anyone notice Gibbsy turning red as the press kept pressing him about the social office&#039;s culpability in this?  I honestly thought he was going to lose it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone notice Gibbsy turning red as the press kept pressing him about the social office&#8217;s culpability in this?  I honestly thought he was going to lose it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macncheez</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-2998671</link>
		<dc:creator>macncheez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-2998671</guid>
		<description>Since these 2 gatecrashers are terrorist sympathisers and chronic liars, Obama&#039;s life was never in danger by their act. It was the life of the Indian PM which was in danger. The state dinner was just a few days before the first anniversary of Mumbai massacre and the security of the &lt;strong&gt;guest&lt;/strong&gt; is also the resposibility of the WH..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since these 2 gatecrashers are terrorist sympathisers and chronic liars, Obama&#8217;s life was never in danger by their act. It was the life of the Indian PM which was in danger. The state dinner was just a few days before the first anniversary of Mumbai massacre and the security of the <strong>guest</strong> is also the resposibility of the WH..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Coleman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/30/secret-service-will-tighten-wh-security-after-party-crashers-scandal/comment-page-2/#comment-2998572</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73926#comment-2998572</guid>
		<description>It will inevitably come out that these two were waved through security by an Obama staffer.  It might not come out until after Obama leaves office, but it will come out.

A good reporter might try to find a way to get some info on this couple&#039;s cell phone records to see who it was they called when they were turned away from the automobile gate.   

The crumbs are out there waiting to be picked up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will inevitably come out that these two were waved through security by an Obama staffer.  It might not come out until after Obama leaves office, but it will come out.</p>
<p>A good reporter might try to find a way to get some info on this couple&#8217;s cell phone records to see who it was they called when they were turned away from the automobile gate.   </p>
<p>The crumbs are out there waiting to be picked up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
