Quotes of the day

“But that’s not even the worst of it. The most important take home lesson is that global frauding was the clear and conscious work of a political machine aiming to steal your money, your liberties, and your country.

No freaking kidding.
Many,many,many people stated this for years only to be scoffed at,ridiculed,and called “flat earthers” by all the “smart ones”.

But now even the average 5th grader can see that the eco-fundamentalist have been the true idiots,especially the ones that bragged about the famous “hockey stick” graph that was used to push their bogus theories for so long.

Now we know the hockey stick graph is in the same league as the 2007 NIE……nothing but bullsh!t!!:

Horse Hockey Climate Scientology: “Getting Rid” of the Medieval Warming Period
http://www.andrewbostom.org/blog/2008/12/25/horse-hockey-climate-scientology-%e2%80%9cgetting-rid%e2%80%9d-of-the-medieval-warming-period/

McIntyre and McKitrick’s  most devastating criticisms of the analyses by Mann et al—invalidating the latter’s work—were upheld without equivocation (or deference to Mann et al) in a subsequent 2006  report chaired by the eminent statistician Edward Wegman (chairman of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences committee on theoretical and applied statistics), and submitted to the US House of Representatives. Here are key excerpts (a few extended) from the report by Wegman et al:

Overall, our committee believes that Mann’s assessments that the decade of the 1990s was the hottest decade of the millennium and that 1998 was the hottest year of the millennium cannot be supported by his analysis.

Where we have commonality, I believe our report and the NRC panel essentially agree. …We believe that our discussion together with the discussion from the NRC report should take the “centering’ issue off the table. [Mann's] decentered methodology is simply incorrect mathematics … I am baffled by the claim that the incorrect method doesn’t matter because the answer is correct anyway. Method Wrong Answer Correct = Bad Science.

Even the leading activist groups like Greenpeace have admitted that they lied to push their agenda:

Greenpeace: Yeah, we misled, but we needed the emotionalism!
posted at 8:47 am on August 20, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

Although he admitted Greenpeace had released inaccurate but alarming information, Leipold defended the organization’s practice of “emotionalizing issues” in order to bring the public around to its way of thinking and alter public opinion.

Leipold said later in the BBC interview that there is an urgent need for the suppression of economic growth in the United States and around the world. He said annual growth rates of 3 percent to 8 percent cannot continue without serious consequences for the climate.

Great…Micheal Moore…Dan Rather….now Greenpeace pushing the “fake but accurate” liberal line.

“It is okay to lie if it gets to the truth” is a position only a pathetic,lying liberal can support.

Former Global Warming Activist: Equations Used In Super-Awesome Computer Models Completely Wrong; Runaway Unlimited Greehnouse Warming Impossible

http://www.dailytech.com/Researcher+Basic+Greenhouse+Equations+Totally+Wrong/article10973.htm

That was until he learned the details of a new theory of the greenhouse effect, one that not only gave far more accurate climate predictions here on Earth, but Mars too. The theory was developed by another Hungarian scientist, Ferenc Miskolczi, an atmospheric physicist with 30 years of experience and a former researcher with NASA’s Langley Research Center.

How did modern researchers make such a mistake? They relied upon equations derived over 80 years ago, equations which left off one term from the final solution.

Miskolczi’s story reads like a book. Looking at a series of differential equations for the greenhouse effect, he noticed the solution — originally done in 1922 by Arthur Milne, but still used by climate researchers today — ignored boundary conditions by assuming an “infinitely thick” atmosphere. Similar assumptions are common when solving differential equations; they simplify the calculations and often result in a result that still very closely matches reality. But not always.

Fake models….cut and paste “facts”….no true data to back up their conclusions….but none of this matters because the “smart ones” all have the same talking points and are never wrong.

Even the eco-fundamentalist shepard Al-Gore’s movie was found to be nothing but political propaganda:

Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’
By Noel Sheppard
Created 2007-10-09 00:55
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/10/09/court-identifies-eleven-inaccuracies-al-gore-s-inconvenient-truth

In order for the film to be shown, the Government must first amend their Guidance Notes to Teachers to make clear that 1.) The Film is a political work and promotes only one side of the argument. 2.) If teachers present the Film without making this plain they may be in breach of section 406 of the Education Act 1996 and guilty of political indoctrination. 3.) Eleven inaccuracies have to be specifically drawn to the attention of school children.

Fraud….fraud….fraud….fraud….fraud….fraud.

Baxter Greene on November 27, 2009 at 11:26 PM

Or as Jerry Dole would say – Al Gore is so crooked he could sleep in a trombone.

MB4 on November 27, 2009 at 11:17 PM

He would be lucky if his fat,Co2 farting A$$ could fit in a trombone.

Hate to have my mouth stuck on the other end of that horn.

Baxter Greene on November 27, 2009 at 11:30 PM

Moral of the story — just because you have a 20,000+ line model doesn\’t mean you have the right answers.

AZfederalist on November 27, 2009 at 11:08 PM

Great point!!

“I’m not dumb. I just have a command of thoroughly useless information”

Calvin and Hobbes

Baxter Greene on November 27, 2009 at 11:43 PM