-deleting vulgarity-

Norman Blizter on November 25, 2009 at 12:35 AM

Bush team ‘agreed plan to attack the Taliban the day before September 11′

The day before the September 11 attacks,the Bush administration agreed on a plan

Let’s pause to simmer in that for a moment. The day BEFORE the September 11 attacks. Got that? BEFORE. That means a plan was being thought of and worked on BEFORE so he couldn’t have been doing nothing.

It goes on:

to oust the Taliban regime in Afghanistan by force if it refused to hand over Osama bin Laden, according to a report by a bipartisan commission of inquiry.

Being the source is the Guardian it feels compelled to go on to say the Clinton “and Bush” administrations had “repeatedly put off” coming up with a plan, an assertion as it pertains to Bush being completely non-sensical and in fact baseless.

KittyLowrey on November 25, 2009 at 10:02 AM
——-
Woah hold on there – according to your darling Dana Perino there WERE NO TERRORIST ATTACKS ON W’S WATCH.

I will assume you retract your post.

SKYFOX on November 25, 2009 at 8:35 AM

Sigh, I know–it’s all about the “buttons”…I’ve been caught too…but this one is just so ignorant–it’s like the little fish you throw back because it’s not worth anything…

What would Palin have Obama do to acknowledge?

I’m not sure I get this one.

AnninCA on November 25, 2009 at 10:50 AM

She wants him to stop looking at the troops as a great photo op and look at them as most Americans do, simply the best of the best.

Disturb the Universe on November 25, 2009 at 11:02 AM

Yes, I read that, but I don’t really understand what she’s calling a “win.”

But then, I guess it was just a quick comment type deal.

What would Palin have Obama do to acknowledge?

I’m not sure I get this one.

AnninCA on November 25, 2009 at 10:50 AM

“Asked specifically what she’d like to see more of from Obama, Palin said, ‘I want to see them equipped. I want to see them given everything that they need, including strategies — a surge strategy in Afghanistan, for one — so that they know that they’re there for victory, they’re not there just biding their time as lives are being lost.’”

I’m not sure I get this one.

Rather than just being informed of a possible terrorist attack at a major airport, GW needed to know the exact time and place of the event too to do anything.

-deleting vulgarity-

Norman Blizter on November 25, 2009 at 12:35 AM

Bush team ‘agreed plan to attack the Taliban the day before September 11′

The day before the September 11 attacks,the Bush administration agreed on a plan

Let’s pause to simmer in that for a moment. The day BEFORE the September 11 attacks. Got that? BEFORE. That means a plan was being thought of and worked on BEFORE so he couldn’t have been doing nothing.

It goes on:

to oust the Taliban regime in Afghanistan by force if it refused to hand over Osama bin Laden, according to a report by a bipartisan commission of inquiry.

Being the source is the Guardian it feels compelled to go on to say the Clinton “and Bush” administrations had “repeatedly put off” coming up with a plan, an assertion as it pertains to Bush being completely non-sensical and in fact baseless.

“He’s bowing to world leaders that I think any other president… I mean that literally.”

What has Obama done on the subject of Hasan?

More Evidence Obama Administration Shut Down Connecting Hasan Dots

Then the attack occurred and on the very day he prefaces remarks on it, knowing some troops had been shot dead, with a shout out (not even properly acknowledging the fellow he was felicitating) and joviality before assuming a solemn voice and face.

Then he eventually attends the site of the massacre where he reads a speech that is now cited as evidence he really cares about these troops.

But then we’re not done. Congress wants to look into why Hasan was not caught as a potential murderer since the public record is positively brimming with evidence of red flags aplenty.

What has Obama done on that? He’s blocking their investigation and even Susan freaking Collins is saying there is something troubling about the way the administration is handling it.

I’ve seen really good trolls here at hotair, but this one is just pathetic.

Proud Texan on November 25, 2009 at 9:39 AM

I second that emotion.

I renamed him Captain Jerkoff a few days ago, because it’s pointless to argue with that thing.

Go BLOW yourself, dumbass.

Norman Blizter on November 25, 2009 at 12:35 AM

First post I read. Only thing that came to mind was…. Boy, do Santas reindeer have potty mouths.

donh525 on November 25, 2009 at 3:07 AM

Ha Ha! Same here. I’ve seen it post here before, and I wondered if it was trying to identify itself as “Donner & Blitzen” and just didn’t know how to spell it. Must be embarassing to be so clueless. I’ve seen really good trolls here at hotair, but this one is just pathetic.

but this rhetoric is really uncalled for. Maybe a month or 2 ago, before he gave a few speeches on his appreciation of the military, and before he even talked about presenting a strategy for Afghanistan. But not now.

AlexB on November 25, 2009 at 9:30 AM

Here is the problem with what you are saying. Obama will talk, and say what his focus groups tell him he needs to say, but what does he actually do? They usually seem to be different things.
He says he’s concerned about the deficit because the polls tell him it is becoming a political problem for him, but he is still throwing away trillions on everything except national defense.

Palin is right, we need actions to back up the empty rhetoric.
You give Obama’s words more meaning than he does.

Presidnet Obama had nothing to do with Ft. Hood. He didn’t receive a memo on a possible terrorist attack and did nothing like GW Bush.

Norman Blizter on November 25, 2009 at 12:24 AM

The PDB GWB received in August 2001 was composed at his request to be given round-up of info on Al Qaeda (he already had ordered a plan be drawn up to address and it was ready—on September 10–he did not have enough time to implement). The PDB he received was composed of information going back to 1998 and had mostly information given to the then president.

The title of that PDB? The 1998 PDB?

“Bin Laden preparing to hijack U.S. aircraft and other attacks.”

Yeah, and Palin’s expert opinion on military strategy comes from…?
Dave Rywall on November 25, 2009 at 8:58 AM

Common sense, Dave…You go to war to win. The exit strategy reveals itself since you can’t predict what will happen. Our generals know the ground game if you listen to them.

full greta interview can be seen here:

http://www.conservatives4palin.com/

unseen on November 25, 2009 at 12:06 AM

Thank you.

Yeah, and Palin’s expert opinion on military strategy comes from…?

Dave Rywall on November 25, 2009 at 8:58 AM

Okay, how about this…Palin was commander of the Alaskan National Guard…she does have infinitely more experience then Obama.
She also, as Gov., worked closely with the military which had the largest most sophisticated defense strike capability in the U.S.
And Obama came into office with…voting present, trying to shake hands/salute/shake hands/salute whatever you are supposed to do, he wasn’t sure….

The Alaska Air National Guard, with 1,946 service members, is involved in an exceptional number of search-and-rescue missions. Since Palin became governor in December 2006, the Air Guard has flown 521 missions, saving 200 lives and assisting with the rescue of 77 more people, said Kalei Brooks, a spokeswoman for the Alaska Department of Military and Veterans Affairs.

And Obama had what experience? Voting “No, or present” is not military experience, sorry to inform you.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/11/the_wilding_of_sarah_palin.html

Yeah, and Palin’s expert opinion on military strategy comes from…? Dave Rywall on November 25, 2009

Palin, or Obama’s replacement in 2012 whomever that will be, doesn’t need to be a tactician. The president, however, needs to have a STRATEGY in place with a political philosophy to undergird it. This is what is lacking with Obambi, there’s no strategy or philosophy involved with him. His strategy politically is just to win by buying votes from the moochers. That doesn’t work with fundamentalist Muslims who don’t want anything from you but your dead body.

Yeah, and Palin’s expert opinion on military strategy comes from…?

Dave Rywall on November 25, 2009 at 8:58 AM

Do you actually pay attention to what she says? Or are you just content with making stuff up? Her entire opinion is that Obama should listen to the advice of experts… the experts he hired and tasked with making recommendations. Palin is not putting forth an ‘expert opinion on military strategy.’ Rather, she is drawing upon her executive/management experience that shows by stating that Obama should be listening to the experts, not his base.

These “progressives” are so alienated from the sacred that they perceive nothing as sacred. And they will destroy anyone whose goodness shines a mirror on their pathology. The spiritually barren must annihilate the vital and the fertile.