<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 14% of homeowners in danger of foreclosure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:23:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: njpat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2974071</link>
		<dc:creator>njpat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2974071</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;More than 14 percent of borrowers were in trouble on their mortgage during the third quarter&lt;/blockquote&gt;

While I agree that unemployment contributes to mortgage defaults, some of the banks are still pushing the &quot;get 3 months behind on your mortgage and then we&#039;ll help&quot; program and there are people falling for it that could have re-financed--the rates are still relatively low.  I wonder how many of those are factored in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>More than 14 percent of borrowers were in trouble on their mortgage during the third quarter</p></blockquote>
<p>While I agree that unemployment contributes to mortgage defaults, some of the banks are still pushing the &#8220;get 3 months behind on your mortgage and then we&#8217;ll help&#8221; program and there are people falling for it that could have re-financed&#8211;the rates are still relatively low.  I wonder how many of those are factored in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cybergeezer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2973990</link>
		<dc:creator>Cybergeezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2973990</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m still wondering when they will sentence Barney and Chris
So what ever the hell you want it should start here.

bluegrass on November 21, 2009 at 9:38 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Amen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’m still wondering when they will sentence Barney and Chris<br />
So what ever the hell you want it should start here.</p>
<p>bluegrass on November 21, 2009 at 9:38 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Amen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluegrass</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2973933</link>
		<dc:creator>bluegrass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2973933</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still wondering when they will sentence Barney and Chris
So what ever the hell you want it should start here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still wondering when they will sentence Barney and Chris<br />
So what ever the hell you want it should start here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AH_C</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2973517</link>
		<dc:creator>AH_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2973517</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;there is still a tax advantage for buying vs. renting becasue owning a home has been judged by our government for decades to be a stabilizing societal force that is to be encouraged. to state that a young family should only rent is ridiculous.

also, who the hell are you two to deny a young family the pride of ownership? get a clue..owning your own home is rewarding in many ways not revealed by a spread sheet.

DrW on November 20, 2009 at 1:25 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;Our family of 4 lived in a 2 bedroom apt for a couple of years, then we were 5 and moved into a larger 2 bedroom apt.  Once we saved enough, our target home was 30% of income.  We settled on a nice one with a bit more sq ft and a huge yard at nearly 40% of our then income--bonus being that it&#039;s semi-rural, yet mins from anything in town.  3 years later, the mortgage is down to 30%, but I can tell you it&#039;s rough making ends meet.  Way rough.  As someone noted above, the little stuff adds up.  Replacing the climate unit, other home repair/improvement stuff brought net current cost of ownership up to 40%, and that before factoring in inflation in cost of living.  

Imagine if I&#039;d lived in a home-owner covenant area where you have other mandatory fees that don&#039;t factor into home prices. I specifically avoid such homes.  We have an acquaintance that lives in such a community and when the dam broke on their pretty lake, the homeowners were hit with the repair bills of approx $2500 each - payable ASAP.  In my brother&#039;s community, they have a community-owned water supply system and when that crapped out, everyone had to cough up to restore water.

Word to the wise, yes it&#039;s nice to &quot;own&quot; a home, but if you don&#039;t watch it, the home will own you.  There&#039;s no shame in renting an apt and waiting. In fact, the market is all but sure to keep dropping, so why don&#039;t/can&#039;t you wait till you think it&#039;s hit bottom.  Then you&#039;ll have the home you always wanted and extra money to play with compared to your Joneses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>there is still a tax advantage for buying vs. renting becasue owning a home has been judged by our government for decades to be a stabilizing societal force that is to be encouraged. to state that a young family should only rent is ridiculous.</p>
<p>also, who the hell are you two to deny a young family the pride of ownership? get a clue..owning your own home is rewarding in many ways not revealed by a spread sheet.</p>
<p>DrW on November 20, 2009 at 1:25 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Our family of 4 lived in a 2 bedroom apt for a couple of years, then we were 5 and moved into a larger 2 bedroom apt.  Once we saved enough, our target home was 30% of income.  We settled on a nice one with a bit more sq ft and a huge yard at nearly 40% of our then income&#8211;bonus being that it&#8217;s semi-rural, yet mins from anything in town.  3 years later, the mortgage is down to 30%, but I can tell you it&#8217;s rough making ends meet.  Way rough.  As someone noted above, the little stuff adds up.  Replacing the climate unit, other home repair/improvement stuff brought net current cost of ownership up to 40%, and that before factoring in inflation in cost of living.  </p>
<p>Imagine if I&#8217;d lived in a home-owner covenant area where you have other mandatory fees that don&#8217;t factor into home prices. I specifically avoid such homes.  We have an acquaintance that lives in such a community and when the dam broke on their pretty lake, the homeowners were hit with the repair bills of approx $2500 each &#8211; payable ASAP.  In my brother&#8217;s community, they have a community-owned water supply system and when that crapped out, everyone had to cough up to restore water.</p>
<p>Word to the wise, yes it&#8217;s nice to &#8220;own&#8221; a home, but if you don&#8217;t watch it, the home will own you.  There&#8217;s no shame in renting an apt and waiting. In fact, the market is all but sure to keep dropping, so why don&#8217;t/can&#8217;t you wait till you think it&#8217;s hit bottom.  Then you&#8217;ll have the home you always wanted and extra money to play with compared to your Joneses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john1schn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2973255</link>
		<dc:creator>john1schn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2973255</guid>
		<description>Simply put, people were treating their homes like ATM machines.  That&#039;s not what a home is for, and they should have known better.  

Simply put, there are lenders and brokers out there that should have known that Stated Income Stated Asset loans were ridiculously risky, 

Simply put, the government should never have put the screws to lenders to lend to people who, by all evidence, should not have been borrowing the money in the first place.

Simply put, there&#039;s a lot of blame to go around.  I&#039;ve seen it from several of these vantage points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simply put, people were treating their homes like ATM machines.  That&#8217;s not what a home is for, and they should have known better.  </p>
<p>Simply put, there are lenders and brokers out there that should have known that Stated Income Stated Asset loans were ridiculously risky, </p>
<p>Simply put, the government should never have put the screws to lenders to lend to people who, by all evidence, should not have been borrowing the money in the first place.</p>
<p>Simply put, there&#8217;s a lot of blame to go around.  I&#8217;ve seen it from several of these vantage points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluegrass</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2972579</link>
		<dc:creator>bluegrass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2972579</guid>
		<description>All the recent forecast have been phony. The TARP money has done nothing to help the distressed real estate market. It is getting worse with more foreclosures to come. Money will get tighter. The feds will keep lending the money to banks at 0% to 1%. They will continue to hold their deadbeat paper as surety to borrow this cheap money so as to put in their credit card business that pays 20-25%. Its the obama economy stupid. The pay-off will be back in the campaign coffers for the dems and the crooks. Thats the obama way thats the tim the tax mans way. No reform. No promising future, higher taxes on the way, high inflation on the way, higher unemployment on the way. Stupidity and corruptness rule the day. You can thank your president, your congress and the media. No hope and pocket change. Charles W Clark and the Chinese not going to be able to help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the recent forecast have been phony. The TARP money has done nothing to help the distressed real estate market. It is getting worse with more foreclosures to come. Money will get tighter. The feds will keep lending the money to banks at 0% to 1%. They will continue to hold their deadbeat paper as surety to borrow this cheap money so as to put in their credit card business that pays 20-25%. Its the obama economy stupid. The pay-off will be back in the campaign coffers for the dems and the crooks. Thats the obama way thats the tim the tax mans way. No reform. No promising future, higher taxes on the way, high inflation on the way, higher unemployment on the way. Stupidity and corruptness rule the day. You can thank your president, your congress and the media. No hope and pocket change. Charles W Clark and the Chinese not going to be able to help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogsoldier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2971570</link>
		<dc:creator>dogsoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2971570</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Let’s go over this again. You seem to think that the Obama administration was concerned about unemployment AT THE TIME they rammed through the Porkulous legislation. Nothing could be further from the truth. boqueronman on November 20, 2009 at 1:27 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;Bozo said it would keep unemployment below 8%. His clown posse had charts and all kinda spew about jobs. \&quot;Shovel Ready\&quot;What we didn\&#039;t know it was a plastic shovel for a beach bucket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Let’s go over this again. You seem to think that the Obama administration was concerned about unemployment AT THE TIME they rammed through the Porkulous legislation. Nothing could be further from the truth. boqueronman on November 20, 2009 at 1:27 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Bozo said it would keep unemployment below 8%. His clown posse had charts and all kinda spew about jobs. \&#8221;Shovel Ready\&#8221;What we didn\&#8217;t know it was a plastic shovel for a beach bucket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: upinak</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2971396</link>
		<dc:creator>upinak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2971396</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;There are still no interested buyers.

Mike Honcho on November 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You sure?  In bold it says there was a buyer... but you all have no clue.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;The citizens of Pontiac deserve better,&quot; Seay said. &quot;This is pennies on the dollar (of what it cost). It goes to show how bad times are ... &lt;strong&gt;Worse, we don&#039;t even know who bought it.&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There are still no interested buyers.</p>
<p>Mike Honcho on November 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>You sure?  In bold it says there was a buyer&#8230; but you all have no clue.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The citizens of Pontiac deserve better,&#8221; Seay said. &#8220;This is pennies on the dollar (of what it cost). It goes to show how bad times are &#8230; <strong>Worse, we don&#8217;t even know who bought it.</strong>&#8221; </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angryed</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2971344</link>
		<dc:creator>angryed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2971344</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;there is still a tax advantage for buying vs. renting becasue owning a home has been judged by our government for decades to be a stabilizing societal force that is to be encouraged. to state that a young family should only rent is ridiculous.

also, who the hell are you two to deny a young family the pride of ownership? get a clue..owning your own home is rewarding in many ways not revealed by a spread sheet.

DrW on November 20, 2009 at 1:25 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wow, if I were to make a caricature of a clueless realtor, I couldn&#039;t do a better job than what you just wrote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>there is still a tax advantage for buying vs. renting becasue owning a home has been judged by our government for decades to be a stabilizing societal force that is to be encouraged. to state that a young family should only rent is ridiculous.</p>
<p>also, who the hell are you two to deny a young family the pride of ownership? get a clue..owning your own home is rewarding in many ways not revealed by a spread sheet.</p>
<p>DrW on November 20, 2009 at 1:25 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow, if I were to make a caricature of a clueless realtor, I couldn&#8217;t do a better job than what you just wrote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Honcho</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2971298</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Honcho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2971298</guid>
		<description>Slightly OT,

 There was an article on &lt;a href=&quot;http://market-ticker.org/archives/1635-Commercial-Real-Estate-Check-99%25-Loss.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Market Ticker&lt;/a&gt; that stated that the Pontiac Silverdome&#039;s price was recently reduced from $20 million to $583,000. 

There are &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;still&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; no interested buyers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slightly OT,</p>
<p> There was an article on <a href="http://market-ticker.org/archives/1635-Commercial-Real-Estate-Check-99%25-Loss.html" rel="nofollow">The Market Ticker</a> that stated that the Pontiac Silverdome&#8217;s price was recently reduced from $20 million to $583,000. </p>
<p>There are <b><i>still</i></b> no interested buyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tremmy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2971144</link>
		<dc:creator>Tremmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2971144</guid>
		<description>More Change as expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More Change as expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PattyJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2971104</link>
		<dc:creator>PattyJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2971104</guid>
		<description>And the gubmint is still making bad loans.  Why? To create a permanent underclass dependent on the largesse of politicians. IOW, Venezuela.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ocregister.com/news/santa-218059-house-program.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Foreclosure Rescue&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the gubmint is still making bad loans.  Why? To create a permanent underclass dependent on the largesse of politicians. IOW, Venezuela.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ocregister.com/news/santa-218059-house-program.html" rel="nofollow">Foreclosure Rescue</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cybergeezer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2970981</link>
		<dc:creator>Cybergeezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2970981</guid>
		<description>And oh yea; You may have free health care, but you&#039;ll never be able to buy a house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And oh yea; You may have free health care, but you&#8217;ll never be able to buy a house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cybergeezer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2970968</link>
		<dc:creator>Cybergeezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2970968</guid>
		<description>The rampant incompetence taking place with the current administration is going to come back and bite &lt;strong&gt;US&lt;/strong&gt; on the ass. And these same incompetents are going to be off in their Italian villas spending our money in their retirement.
&lt;strong&gt;Haven&#039;t you figured that out yet?&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rampant incompetence taking place with the current administration is going to come back and bite <strong>US</strong> on the ass. And these same incompetents are going to be off in their Italian villas spending our money in their retirement.<br />
<strong>Haven&#8217;t you figured that out yet?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redwhiteblue</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2970896</link>
		<dc:creator>redwhiteblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2970896</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;angry red and redwhiteblue

there is still a tax advantage for buying vs. renting becasue owning a home has been judged by our government for decades to be a stabilizing societal force that is to be encouraged. to state that a young family should only rent is ridiculous.

also, who the hell are you two to deny a young family the pride of ownership? get a clue..owning your own home is rewarding in many ways not revealed by a spread sheet.

DrW on November 20, 2009 at 1:25 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You have to be kidding, right?  Or are you 12 years old?  If so, I apologize for my angry tone.  
&lt;em&gt;Integrity, personal responsibility, sacrifice, financial stewardship, diligence, perseverance, and stability&lt;/em&gt; - please look these words up.
Perhaps you will begin to understand the actual process involved in matters of home ownership.  Best wishes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>angry red and redwhiteblue</p>
<p>there is still a tax advantage for buying vs. renting becasue owning a home has been judged by our government for decades to be a stabilizing societal force that is to be encouraged. to state that a young family should only rent is ridiculous.</p>
<p>also, who the hell are you two to deny a young family the pride of ownership? get a clue..owning your own home is rewarding in many ways not revealed by a spread sheet.</p>
<p>DrW on November 20, 2009 at 1:25 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>You have to be kidding, right?  Or are you 12 years old?  If so, I apologize for my angry tone.<br />
<em>Integrity, personal responsibility, sacrifice, financial stewardship, diligence, perseverance, and stability</em> &#8211; please look these words up.<br />
Perhaps you will begin to understand the actual process involved in matters of home ownership.  Best wishes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockmom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2970813</link>
		<dc:creator>rockmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2970813</guid>
		<description>A lot of executives and managers who were laid off a year ago and given a year of severance pay have now gone through that and are still without jobs.  I know a few of them.  They are going to have to dump their houses now for whatever they can get.  A lot of families have cut everything they can cut to keep paying for the house, but they can&#039;t cut any more now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of executives and managers who were laid off a year ago and given a year of severance pay have now gone through that and are still without jobs.  I know a few of them.  They are going to have to dump their houses now for whatever they can get.  A lot of families have cut everything they can cut to keep paying for the house, but they can&#8217;t cut any more now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boqueronman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2970793</link>
		<dc:creator>boqueronman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2970793</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s go over this again.  You seem to think that the Obama administration was concerned about unemployment AT THE TIME they rammed through the Porkulous legislation.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  For the Obama-lytes, the market economy is a black box.  Impenetrable and unknowable.  So they assumed that the magic elixir - whatever it is - would work again and the economy would experience a V shaped recovery, just in time for the 2010 election.  In the meantime, the Progressive Marxist-Keynesian mind sees no connection between national (household, corporate and fiscal) debt and economic performance.  And, since the Progressives now possessed the keys to the USG Fed-Treasury candy store, they decided to raid it for sweets and pass out the goodies to their constituencies.  Consequences?  What consequences?  None of the so-called recovery initiatives - C4C, Wall Street bailouts, or tax credits for home purchases were aimed at solving household budget/debt problems.  They were all aimed at supporting efforts by favored corporations-unions to kick the can down the road or extend and pretend until the &quot;recovery&quot; is solidified.  Now they see the light at the end of the tunnel and even they are starting to realize that it&#039;s probably not daylight they see but more likely the headlights of a runaway train of continued deep recession extending beyond November 2010.  The resulting electoral crackup may well be giving the Axelrod-Emanuel crew some restless sleep, hopefully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s go over this again.  You seem to think that the Obama administration was concerned about unemployment AT THE TIME they rammed through the Porkulous legislation.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  For the Obama-lytes, the market economy is a black box.  Impenetrable and unknowable.  So they assumed that the magic elixir &#8211; whatever it is &#8211; would work again and the economy would experience a V shaped recovery, just in time for the 2010 election.  In the meantime, the Progressive Marxist-Keynesian mind sees no connection between national (household, corporate and fiscal) debt and economic performance.  And, since the Progressives now possessed the keys to the USG Fed-Treasury candy store, they decided to raid it for sweets and pass out the goodies to their constituencies.  Consequences?  What consequences?  None of the so-called recovery initiatives &#8211; C4C, Wall Street bailouts, or tax credits for home purchases were aimed at solving household budget/debt problems.  They were all aimed at supporting efforts by favored corporations-unions to kick the can down the road or extend and pretend until the &#8220;recovery&#8221; is solidified.  Now they see the light at the end of the tunnel and even they are starting to realize that it&#8217;s probably not daylight they see but more likely the headlights of a runaway train of continued deep recession extending beyond November 2010.  The resulting electoral crackup may well be giving the Axelrod-Emanuel crew some restless sleep, hopefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrW</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2970788</link>
		<dc:creator>DrW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2970788</guid>
		<description>angry red and redwhiteblue

there is still a tax advantage for buying vs. renting becasue owning a home has been judged by our government for decades to be a stabilizing societal force that is to be encouraged. to state that a young family should only rent is ridiculous.

also, who the hell are you two to deny a young family the pride of ownership?  get a clue..owning your own home is rewarding in many ways not revealed by a spread sheet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>angry red and redwhiteblue</p>
<p>there is still a tax advantage for buying vs. renting becasue owning a home has been judged by our government for decades to be a stabilizing societal force that is to be encouraged. to state that a young family should only rent is ridiculous.</p>
<p>also, who the hell are you two to deny a young family the pride of ownership?  get a clue..owning your own home is rewarding in many ways not revealed by a spread sheet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbordwell</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2970784</link>
		<dc:creator>bbordwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2970784</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s time to get rich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s time to get rich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redwhiteblue</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2970763</link>
		<dc:creator>redwhiteblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2970763</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;1. buying a house is not a totallly economic decision. if you just had twins and live in a 1 BR apt, you are going to need a home with more bedrooms.
DrW on November 20, 2009 at 1:04 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wrong Doc!  The word &lt;strong&gt;buying&lt;/strong&gt; means it &lt;strong&gt;is&lt;/strong&gt; an economic decision.  In the case of the twins, I suggest you will have to tough it out and make your living room into a bedroom, eat cheaply, stay out of the malls, and &lt;strong&gt;work&lt;/strong&gt; your freakin way up in the world like the generations before you have!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>1. buying a house is not a totallly economic decision. if you just had twins and live in a 1 BR apt, you are going to need a home with more bedrooms.<br />
DrW on November 20, 2009 at 1:04 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Wrong Doc!  The word <strong>buying</strong> means it <strong>is</strong> an economic decision.  In the case of the twins, I suggest you will have to tough it out and make your living room into a bedroom, eat cheaply, stay out of the malls, and <strong>work</strong> your freakin way up in the world like the generations before you have!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angryed</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2970722</link>
		<dc:creator>angryed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2970722</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;1. buying a house is not a totallly economic decision. if you just had twins and live in a 1 BR apt, you are going to need a home with more bedrooms.



DrW on November 20, 2009 at 1:04 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Or you get a 3 bedroom apartment. Or you rent a house you can afford. Or if you&#039;re hell bent on buying, you move to a lower cost area. Why is the default option to buy more house than you can afford?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>1. buying a house is not a totallly economic decision. if you just had twins and live in a 1 BR apt, you are going to need a home with more bedrooms.</p>
<p>DrW on November 20, 2009 at 1:04 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Or you get a 3 bedroom apartment. Or you rent a house you can afford. Or if you&#8217;re hell bent on buying, you move to a lower cost area. Why is the default option to buy more house than you can afford?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vashta.Nerada</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2970721</link>
		<dc:creator>Vashta.Nerada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2970721</guid>
		<description>If you think that is bad, have a look at commercial real estate. James Stewart believes that half of all those loans will have debt service ratios below 1.0 by mid 2010. That means that they will owe more on the note than they take in on rent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think that is bad, have a look at commercial real estate. James Stewart believes that half of all those loans will have debt service ratios below 1.0 by mid 2010. That means that they will owe more on the note than they take in on rent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge Bonilla</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2970718</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge Bonilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2970718</guid>
		<description>The bulk of all ARMS were written between &#039;05-&#039;07, at the top of the market.  This recent downturn was only the tip of the real estate iceberg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bulk of all ARMS were written between &#8217;05-&#8217;07, at the top of the market.  This recent downturn was only the tip of the real estate iceberg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franksalterego</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2970715</link>
		<dc:creator>franksalterego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2970715</guid>
		<description>Never fear,

Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and Maxine Waters are here to save the day.

Oh, wait...........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never fear,</p>
<p>Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and Maxine Waters are here to save the day.</p>
<p>Oh, wait&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redwhiteblue</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/20/14-of-homeowners-in-danger-of-foreclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-2970713</link>
		<dc:creator>redwhiteblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=73168#comment-2970713</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If you have a house built, and you hire an architect to design and build that house, and you hire a contractor to build that house…and that house, after moving in, collapses because of poor design and work. Do you blame the home owner for relying on their experts? Who is at fault?

right2bright on November 20, 2009 at 12:25 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;


I did have a house built.  It did fall apart.  I was mad as hell at the builder.  
But I was even more upset with myself for not making a better choice when&lt;strong&gt; I selected&lt;/strong&gt; that builder. Since it was my house, I took care of fixing the problems.  I let the builder know I was unhappy with him, and also mistrustful of anything he could do to help fix things...since he did such a bad job in the first place.  Shortly thereafter, the bad builder went out of business.  After some sacrifice, I now have a solid home.  It wasn&#039;t a pleasant experience...but accepting &lt;strong&gt;personal responsibility&lt;/strong&gt;  ceratinly helps me be at peace.  I recommend that you try to avoid playing the &lt;em&gt;Blame Game&lt;/em&gt;....and keep it real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If you have a house built, and you hire an architect to design and build that house, and you hire a contractor to build that house…and that house, after moving in, collapses because of poor design and work. Do you blame the home owner for relying on their experts? Who is at fault?</p>
<p>right2bright on November 20, 2009 at 12:25 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I did have a house built.  It did fall apart.  I was mad as hell at the builder.<br />
But I was even more upset with myself for not making a better choice when<strong> I selected</strong> that builder. Since it was my house, I took care of fixing the problems.  I let the builder know I was unhappy with him, and also mistrustful of anything he could do to help fix things&#8230;since he did such a bad job in the first place.  Shortly thereafter, the bad builder went out of business.  After some sacrifice, I now have a solid home.  It wasn&#8217;t a pleasant experience&#8230;but accepting <strong>personal responsibility</strong>  ceratinly helps me be at peace.  I recommend that you try to avoid playing the <em>Blame Game</em>&#8230;.and keep it real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
