Comments on: Video: 10-year-old refuses to pledge allegiance until gays can marry

By: Survey of Adult Homeschooled Students: Better in Almost Every Way

Survey of Adult Homeschooled Students: Better in Almost Every Way — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:56:06 +0000

[...] Video: 10-year-old refuses to pledge allegiance until gays can marry (hotair.com) [...]

By: Hot Air » Blog Archive » CNN anchor tells bullies of kid who won’t say pledge: It is you, my friends, who are the wads

Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:37:12 +0000

[...] the original clip of the pledge kid, who has Jon Stewart on his side too. Exit fun fact: Joey’s underwear is [...]

By: elle capitan

elle capitan — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:45:46 +0000

Oh, and I am convinced that homosexuality is a genetic defect.

By: elle capitan

elle capitan — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:43:49 +0000

Race Card – there wasn’t any bigotry in my statement that I feel this kid is being influenced by an adult — either his feminine father or a teacher who might be inclined to molest him at that prime age. Name ONE thing that is bigoted about that statement. It’s a concern that the kid is being heavily influenced and could possibly be a victim of gay molestation. I wish they would have asked the father if he was gay…just to clear things up.

By: Fuquay Steve

Fuquay Steve — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:26:37 +0000

Allah is that you? You’re on the right, right? Where’s your Sarah button?

By: Army Brat

Army Brat — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:11:54 +0000

Obama…inspiring his peers the world over. how appropriate that he so inspires the children…and the child like.
The child King rules us now, with all his insane advisers eager to “help” the masses. It is their duty, as they see it to save us from our ignorance, religions and silly useless freedoms. These things stand in the way of Hope and Change. They impede progress, as does the Constitution.

By: BlueStateBilly

BlueStateBilly — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:40:42 +0000

I wish I was 10 again so I could be the first to beat this kid up on the playground.

Someone needs to hold this little snot-nosed punk down and show him some documentaries on the various wars that have been fought and men who have died for his right to be a complete imbecile.

By: maverick muse

maverick muse — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:39:52 +0000

/Great home life for that boy with his twisted parents who don’t appreciate their own responsibilities to provide this child with a happy childhood, let alone love each other and share their respect for heterosexual marriage with their own child. This dad promotes not getting along in order to prove that not everyone is getting along.

By: Esthier

Esthier — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:19:53 +0000

CA did, by judicial fiat.

Chris_Balsz on November 19, 2009 at 11:12 AM

For a matter of months. Are you arguing that the doctor was sued specifically because marriage for gays had become legal during that time? The woman started legal proceedings in 2000 based on a law that was already in place stating that she couldn’t be discriminated against because she’s a l*sbian.

By: Chris_Balsz

Chris_Balsz — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:12:26 +0000

Neither of those states have legalized gay marriage.

Esthier on November 18, 2009 at 8:44 PM

CA did, by judicial fiat. Prop 8 did not declare gay marriage never had been legal–it did not address gays who got a marriage license–but it did forbid it from now on.

By: Esthier

Esthier — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:53:06 +0000

Rights can never be ruled “null and void”.

Dollayo on November 19, 2009 at 7:06 AM

The Second Amendment is a right, but it is one people can lose, generally felons. Maybe it shouldn’t be this way, but it isn’t accurate to say that the government doesn’t take away rights.

By: Dollayo

Dollayo — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:06:25 +0000

I still maintain that getting a marriage license is NOT a right. The laws regarding marriage, and in fact all contracts, are set in each state by the people through representative government or by direct referendum elections. Federal law states that it is against the law to get married for a sole purpose of obtaining US citizenship and courts have ruled such marriage contracts null and void for years. Rights can never be ruled “null and void”.

By: hopefloats

hopefloats — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:27:39 +0000

Nothing “cute” about it. It shows gross stupidity, a lack of life wisdom, and a Dad thrilled by the attention he’s getting.
The state of “marriage” was never a government issue until laws were put into place to require a “license”, which allowed them to require a “fee”, paid to government, in order to obtain one. Another government “cash cow”.

By: tom

tom — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:05:55 +0000

I, unlike you, am able to separate my moral imperatives from the rest of society’s.

The Race Card on November 18, 2009 at 7:33 PM

Rhetoric like yours is one reason why 31 states so far have not been impressed with the argument for same-sex “marriage.”

Your side is the one calling for government intervention into things that the government has no business in.

By: Esthier

Esthier — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:35:26 +0000

well by golly you win a prize there gomer!!

No, only you can win that prize. You're a total winner if not with kindness and other Christian virtues at least with your insistence that you're always right while asserting so without even pretending to respect anyone here.

and uh you think with gay marriage, it’ll be liberty and justice for all…right. right4life on November 18, 2009 at 9:20 PM

Is that what I said? I mean the thread here shows something else, and I remember not mentioning what would happen if gay marriage were legal, but you must be right. You always are. Still, all I mean to be saying is that gay marriage isn't the cause of these laws, which appears to stand to reason as these issues aren't limited to states with legal gay marriage. It's clearly happening with or without gay marriage.

By: right4life

right4life — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:20:53 +0000

Neither of those states have legalized gay marriage.

Esthier on November 18, 2009 at 8:44 PM

well by golly you win a prize there gomer!!

and uh you think with gay marriage, it’ll be liberty and justice for all…right.

By: galvestonian

galvestonian — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:02:36 +0000

I didn’t read through the thread, so it’s probably been said already, but…

Another effect of the Obama indoctrination.

By: Esthier

Esthier — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:44:09 +0000

a doctor in CA was sued because he refused to artificially inseminate a lesbian..he lost. same with a photographer in AZ…

right4life on November 18, 2009 at 7:23 PM

Neither of those states have legalized gay marriage.

By: Narutoboy

Narutoboy — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:43:22 +0000

The Race Card on November 18, 2009 at 7:29 PM

Not really. Calling it what it is doesn’t necessarily mean I “pity” them. I’m actually pretty indifferent when it comes to this. This is the problem with gay marriage proponents. You guys always want to attach some negative connotation to our beliefs. It’s sad.

By: The Race Card

The Race Card — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:33:38 +0000

Apparently not true, since your claim has been denied in 31 states now.

States have every right to vote on passage of any law that does not violate the Constitution. Why would I have a problem with that? I, unlike you, am able to separate my moral imperatives from the rest of society’s.

By: The Race Card

The Race Card — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:29:40 +0000

Lol, If I truly hated homosexuals, believe me I’d tell you.

Narutoboy on November 18, 2009 at 7:26 PM

I get it. You don’t despise homosexuals, you pity them.

By: The Race Card

The Race Card — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:27:50 +0000

vast majority

Must every majority be “vast?” Good grief, that’s horrid.

By: Narutoboy

Narutoboy — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:26:57 +0000

Ultimately, gay-marriage will not weaken or strengthen my own marriage. It won’t interfere with my relationships with God or family.

The Race Card on November 18, 2009 at 6:34 PM

Neither would allowing someone to marry a pencil. How dare you not allow people to marry their pencils, you pencilphobe. You due have to have some standards. A lot of people draw that line at heterosexual marriage (encompassing race, religion, etc.). Since I only see you talking about gay marriage, I guess your “line” is drawn at gay marriage. “sound bigoted”, “venomous bile” Lol, If I truly hated homosexuals, believe me I’d tell you.

By: ray

ray — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:24:27 +0000

LOL, you are such a whore.

By: right4life

right4life — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:23:49 +0000

That’s a theory, but it hasn’t happened anywhere gay marriage is already legal.

Esthier on November 18, 2009 at 6:52 PM

its much more than a ‘theory’ its fact…its whats going to happen…and is happening right now..you do know that in MA for example, the catholic charities had to quit offering adoptions because they refused to give childrne to homosexuals?

a doctor in CA was sued because he refused to artificially inseminate a lesbian..he lost. same with a photographer in AZ…