Poll: 51% of Republicans would rather risk losing elections than win with RINOs

posted at 6:40 pm on November 17, 2009 by Allahpundit

Reminds me of Jim DeMint notoriously saying that he’d rather have 30 pure conservatives in the Senate than a centrist Republican majority, presumably so that he could lose with honor on every single vote.

Remember that old commercial about pollution where Iron Eyes Cody turns to the camera and a single tear rolls down his cheek? That’s Frum when he reads this.

The poll indicates that a slight majority, 51 percent, of Republicans would prefer to see the GOP in their area nominate candidates who agree with them on all the major the issues even if they have a poor chance of beating the Democratic candidate. Forty-three percent of Republicans say they would rather have candidates with whom they don’t agree on all the important issues but who can beat the Democrats.

Democrats polled seemed to place a slightly higher priority on electoral victory: 58 percent say that they would like their party to nominate candidates who can beat Republicans, even if they don’t agree with those candidates on all the issues. Fewer than 4 in 10 Democrats say they would rather see their party nominate candidates who agree with them on all major issues, but have a poor chance of beating the Republican candidate.

“One reason for the difference between the parties: the Democrats have a relatively even split on ideological grounds. Thirty-four percent of Democrats are liberal, 40 percent are moderates and less than one in four call themselves conservatives,” says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland.

By contrast, 73 percent of Republicans questioned in the poll say they are conservatives, with only 26 percent describing themselves as liberal or moderate Republicans.

Democrats are +20 on whether they’d rather win with centrists than lose with true believers; Republicans are -8. That’s not a huge problem when moderates are trending right after gagging on Hopenchange for the better part of a year — note that The One’s approval rating is now 45 percent among independents, down seven points in just a month — but if/when unemployment starts to recover and the trend stabilizes, it’s a major problem. A 28-point spread between the parties on this point essentially places the GOP’s fortunes in the Democrats’ hands: The only way the right wins a majority is if the left screws things up so egregiously that even staunch conservatives are apt to beat centrist Democrats head to head. It’s a passive strategy, but it’s a strategy, I guess. Exit question one: If the GOP’s so conservative these days, how is it that only 44 percent of Republicans want Palin to run for president versus 48 percent who don’t? Exit question two: Isn’t Romney’s candidacy likely to be the ultimate test of whether CNN’s poll is accurate or not? He’s going to end up as the anti-Palin, after all.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 3 4 5

Chris of Rights on November 19, 2009 at 8:48 AM

The problem there is, having conceded social conservatism to get elected once, you will be told it’s off the table forever. As happened in 2005-2006, a Republican majority will not be obliged to examine its principles just because you’d like a cleaner, cheaper operation. It’s enough that the Democrats lose.

And if we concede the federal judicial overreach that is driving social liberalism, we can’t have fiscal conservatism. You know, access to federal spending is really a right!

Chris_Balsz on November 19, 2009 at 11:19 AM

The reality is this, if conservatism does not have enough numbers to elect, the nation will not run on conservative principles anyway.

Elect real conservatives, even if they are minority, and let them represent real conservatism in Washington. They will have to join coalition to have any voice, but they will be choosing coaltion based on best possible conservative outcome.

Right now, we have RINOs elected who will choose coalitions based upon RINO principles, and RINO coaltions got us Campaign Finance Reform, amnesty, etc

RINOs and progressives despise conservatives, and work to devalue conservative principles in the MSM, which works to push conservatism down in the population

We had the RINO compromise under Bush/McCain and it invigorated only the DEMs and made possible Obama.

If the so-called compromise candidate is not liked by his own base, why should anyone outside the base like him?

As for judges, Bush put in a good judge, at the price of Obama having four years to replace more than one judge

entagor on November 19, 2009 at 12:03 PM

The only way the right wins a majority is if the left screws things up so egregiously that even staunch conservatives are apt to beat centrist Democrats head to head.

That hasn’t happened?

abobo on November 19, 2009 at 7:57 PM

Comment pages: 1 3 4 5