$6.4 billion in Porkulus money spent in phantom districts?
posted at 12:14 pm on November 17, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Earlier this morning, Sammy Benoit asked me how it felt to live in a much larger Minnesota, with new Congressional districts popping up all over. Any thrill of getting extra representation in Congress got muted by the fact that the Obama administration apparently added more phantom Congressional districts (440) than actually exist now (435), and that they somehow showed $6.4 billion in Porkulus money going to these nonexistent districts. Watchdog.org has tracked down the massive failure to check data at Recovery.gov, the reporting arm of Porkulus for the White House:
Just how big is the stimulus package? Well for one, it has doubled the size of the House of Representatives, according to recovery.gov, which says that funds were distributed to 440 congressional districts that do not exist.
According to data retrieved from recovery.gov, nearly $6.4 billion was used to “create or save” just under 30,000 jobs in these phantom congressional districts–almost $225,000 per job. The web site operates on an $84 million budget and is tasked with monitoring the distribution of the $787 billion stimulus package passed by Congress–which, for the record, counts 435 members–in early 2009.
The site’s monitors, however, are not too savvy about America’s political or geographic landscape. More than $2 million was given to the 99th District of North Dakota, a state which has only one congressional district. In order to qualify for 99 districts, North Dakota would have to have a population of about 60 million people, almost 24 million more people than California.
The stimulus revived 8 recently retired congressional districts. Pennsylvania’s 21st District has received just under $2 million in funds. Mississippi’s 5th District and Oklahoma’s 6th received $1 million from the legislation, respectively. All three were eliminated by the 2000 census.
Many other recipients carried the banner for congressional districts that have been defunct for decades. South Carolina’s 7th took the cake, garnering more than $27 million in stimulus funds, despite being eliminated in 1930. And Virginia’s 12th District may have been written off at the start of the Civil War, but it must carry some sentimental value in Old Dominion–it received more than $2 million, according to recovery.gov.
Some may feel that a $6.4 billion error is simply a rounding problem, but I recall a time when that used to be considered real money. For instance, that would have been about a seventh of the federal deficit for September, but only about 3% of the federal deficit in October. Who knew the Obama administration could point to that level of improvement! Doesn’t that make you feel better about your government’s ability to handle money?
As a former database administrator myself, I am not unaware of the challenges of bad data. However, that just means that database administrators have to set proper filters to restrict entries to prevent the infiltration of bad data. One particular strategy for a database built on Congressional districts for reporting would be to load a list of legitimate districts by state as a filter. That would have caught records for 35 Congressional districts in Washington DC, as an example … since Washington DC doesn’t have any Congressional districts at all.
This again demonstrates the rank incompetence of the Obama administration, and the folly of trusting government to spend our money more than we trust ourselves. The ostensible reason for Porkulus was to boost the economy, which Obama proposed to do by taking capital out of the markets and spending it on a raft of Democratic pork projects and progressive wish lists. We knew that the list of spending priorities would do nothing to boost the economy, but even we didn’t foresee just how incompetent the White House would be in tracking the money. How hard is it to get a list of actual Congressional districts, for Pete’s sake?
Meanwhile, I’ll claim my house as Minnesota’s 27th Congressional district, and the $3.159 million the government apparently wants to throw at it. Please deliver it in small, unmarked bills. I promise it will stimulate the local economy, especially the Blu-Ray and computer-equipment industries.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 3 Next »
Best. Administration. EVAH.
Enoxo on November 17, 2009 at 12:17 PM
They must be in those other 7 states that Obama has been in.
wildcat84 on November 17, 2009 at 12:17 PM
Sounds good, Ed. My house is the Minnesota 57th.
Mr. D on November 17, 2009 at 12:18 PM
Most ethical congress evah eh!
hawkman on November 17, 2009 at 12:18 PM
Must be nice to have such a great administration and presentdent.
You know the fool over in china, telling them chicom’s that we are great and will pay it back.
5 bucks (deer) that we go bankrupt.
upinak on November 17, 2009 at 12:19 PM
Uh-oh. Someone’s been messin’ with Joe.
Wasn’t too hard, was it?
CDeb on November 17, 2009 at 12:19 PM
This is hilarious. When do you think they will figure out that people are watching?
ORconservative on November 17, 2009 at 12:19 PM
Could they be have been referring to districts in the individual State Houses/Assemblies?
I kinda doubt it, but I thought I’d throw the possibility out there.
forest on November 17, 2009 at 12:19 PM
Imagine if Bush was Pesident…
Sonosam on November 17, 2009 at 12:19 PM
Didn’t it cost about 20 million bucks to make the recovery website?
BadgerHawk on November 17, 2009 at 12:20 PM
When they hear it on MSNBC, so never.
Kafir on November 17, 2009 at 12:21 PM
The adults are in charge. Shysters.
JAM on November 17, 2009 at 12:21 PM
Are they referring to delegates like Norton in DC? There are five delegates I believe so they are probabably counting DC, Puerto Rico etc.
taney71 on November 17, 2009 at 12:22 PM
Hand.
Cookie Jar.
Caught.
BigAlSouth on November 17, 2009 at 12:22 PM
This is nothing short of criminal…
SHARPTOOTH on November 17, 2009 at 12:22 PM
I’ll ask the obvious question:
Where the frack is the money? Someone’s offshore accounts? Paying Soros back? SEIU?
Enquiring mind wants to know.
tru2tx on November 17, 2009 at 12:23 PM
If you use stimulus money to host a luau, do you end up with twice cooked pork?
/rimshot
TheUnrepentantGeek on November 17, 2009 at 12:24 PM
The opposition advertisement wrote themselves.
Sir Napsalot on November 17, 2009 at 12:24 PM
O’bama now bleeds from 57 wounds. Pass the ketchup, Teresa!
Del Dolemonte on November 17, 2009 at 12:24 PM
Hey this is just Districts
Savedor Created!!Go Barry!!!
BigWyo on November 17, 2009 at 12:24 PM
I’m glad the adults are in charge
angryed on November 17, 2009 at 12:24 PM
Save or Created
Translation:
To Save Obama, we Created Jobs.
portlandon on November 17, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Smart power.
CP on November 17, 2009 at 12:25 PM
While this is happening, top story in the MSM…..what color skirt did Palin wear on Oprah.
angryed on November 17, 2009 at 12:25 PM
IF the government can make huge sums of money magically disappear, can they magically make them appear?
Oh yeah, they’ve already done that.
Sir Napsalot on November 17, 2009 at 12:25 PM
LOO-SEY!!!!!!!!!YOU GOT’S SOME SPLAININ TO DOOOO!!!!!!!!!!
BigAlSouth on November 17, 2009 at 12:25 PM
And….. how many MILLIONS have already been spent on Recovery.gov?
Are we being fleeced by all these clowns? Might better check passports and travel arrangements for all these politicians in 2010. I get the feeling they are moving the money out of the country and plan to jump ship after punching so many holes that she has to sink.
joedoe on November 17, 2009 at 12:26 PM
While it’s fun to pin this on Obama, this is simply an unavoidable consequence of government – especially federal government. The simpliest way to understand this problem is to learn Milton Friedman’s 4 Ways of Spending Money:
Reagan intuitively understood this. I think Palin does as well. Few other politicians however really grasp this basic lesson and because of that they are always putting things in terms of “Obama wastes money” or “Bush wastes money” and all of the time thinking that it will be different when THEY are in power. It won’t because waste and inefficiency is an basic “feature” of government.
The only way to fight it is to reduce the size of government or to move the functions of government to the local level whenever possible.
PackerBronco on November 17, 2009 at 12:26 PM
I’m thinking about relocating. I wonder what the property taxes are like?
anuts on November 17, 2009 at 12:26 PM
Imagine if Palin were President
faraway on November 17, 2009 at 12:26 PM
“Barron’s is announcing that there are 6 new billionaires in the US, all Democrat members of Congress.”
LincolntheHun on November 17, 2009 at 12:27 PM
Hey,Pelosi,get the broom,forget about the House cleaning,
theres a mess in one of the congressional aisles!!!!!!!!!!
canopfor on November 17, 2009 at 12:28 PM
Rush is right, it is a slush fund.
ORconservative on November 17, 2009 at 12:28 PM
No. North Dakota, for example, only has 47 districts in its legislature:
http://www.legis.nd.gov/assembly/61-2009/dist-legis.html
This is out and out fraud, a looting of the American Treasury to enrich these marxist, socialists, fascists and George Soros.
rbj on November 17, 2009 at 12:28 PM
Jake Tapper had a post on this yesterday.
My favorite part was when he detailed all of the congressional districts in Puerto Rico, Northern Marianas, and the US Virgin Islands which had received money.
teke184 on November 17, 2009 at 12:28 PM
You just can’t make this stuff up. This adm is the most inept, incompetent, crooked, and secret in HISTORY!
rjoco1 on November 17, 2009 at 12:29 PM
This is what I want to know. If the money has already been sent out, then it had to go SOMEwhere! Are these just data errors that just need to be corrected to the right districts (if they actually KNOW what those are) or is this money actually going out to areas that do not exist? And if the latter, WHERE DID THE MONEY GO??? I think ALL taxpayers ought to be up in arms on this one, demanding to know where the money has actually gone to.
Highlar on November 17, 2009 at 12:29 PM
Rape-rape.
LibTired on November 17, 2009 at 12:29 PM
I am pretty sure the Obama administration is including DC, Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands, and Puerto Rico in the count.
Since they are US territories and have delegates that go to Congress to represent the people living there I don’t see this as being a big of a deal as what you are making it out to be.
taney71 on November 17, 2009 at 12:29 PM
Maybe FDR will be appearing on TV soon (alongside Sheriff Joe) to reassure us that the Great Recession is all but over.
I’m also looking forward to more of Lincoln’s Facebook posts on our war efforts.
red winger on November 17, 2009 at 12:30 PM
Another FU BO the Clown Operation!!
canopfor on November 17, 2009 at 12:31 PM
“$6.4 billion in Porkulus money spent in phantom districts?”
Is anyone really surprised? The gangsta’ from Chicago has everything under control.
GFW on November 17, 2009 at 12:31 PM
You would think there are laws being broken what with federal dollars being deliberatly winnowed away in non-existent enterprises. And if so then there ought to be records of who authorized said diversions. Is anybody keeping records of this?
A few well directed convictions that will remove federal pensions may get the attention of our dens of theives in DC.
DanMan on November 17, 2009 at 12:31 PM
Pork delivered to those extra 7 states; Obama counts 57.
maverick muse on November 17, 2009 at 12:32 PM
Are they counting the districts in all 57 states?
JoeinTX on November 17, 2009 at 12:32 PM
Holding my breath until our resident trolls appear….
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
THUD
Patrick S on November 17, 2009 at 12:32 PM
Jefferson Part Deux!!
canopfor on November 17, 2009 at 12:33 PM
It would be great if there were a good explanation for this but I believe, truly, that this money is going for a stimulus of a different kind.
Are we into impeachable territory yet?
ORconservative on November 17, 2009 at 12:34 PM
I join the chorus.
maverick muse on November 17, 2009 at 12:34 PM
Pork delivered to those extra 7 states; Obama counts 57.
maverick muse on November 17, 2009 at 12:32 PM
maverick muse: Its pure madness!!:)
canopfor on November 17, 2009 at 12:34 PM
One serious question, WHERE is the media reporting?
I know, I know, WHAM (White House Approved Media) will not touch it.
Sir Napsalot on November 17, 2009 at 12:34 PM
Well, that is wrong. The 6.4 billion is going to all the districts. They totaled the number up. Only a faction of the 6.4 billion is going to the five “extra” districts which most likely are DC, Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands, and Puerto Rico.
I would update this post to include that information. All of these places are territories of the US. They are not districts but the US Congress can and most likely should budget money to those places since we “own” them.
taney71 on November 17, 2009 at 12:34 PM
Where is the Government Accountability Office?
BottomLine5 on November 17, 2009 at 12:34 PM
Maybe those districts are in the missing seven states of our Union?
Well, at least that $6.4 billion didn’t go into the War for Oil. /sarc
Every day it’s something new and bad with this Administration. When will even the libs say ‘enough’?
Liam on November 17, 2009 at 12:34 PM
I keep thinking that “phantom districts” means “phantom residents” and keep remembering that we have a Census coming up next year.
Anybody else thinking along those lines?
Aitch748 on November 17, 2009 at 12:35 PM
Obumma makes David Copperfield look like a rank amateur. I mean, making a 747 jetliner disappear is one thing, but creating more than 400-new congressional districts appear out of thin air? Now that is extraordinary magic, or as some cynics would say, just more smoke and mirrors.
Goldy1 on November 17, 2009 at 12:35 PM
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
CurtZHP on November 17, 2009 at 12:36 PM
Liam has the answer for ya
cmsinaz on November 17, 2009 at 12:36 PM
The Joker sends pork to the dead, illegals, and foreign interests as well as American organized crime. Compassionate Liberalism.
maverick muse on November 17, 2009 at 12:37 PM
I believe the Legal term is…”FRAUD”.
PappaMac on November 17, 2009 at 12:37 PM
They did include US territories to get to 440. If you look at the underlining data and the itemized list of areas where the money was spent you will see the Obama administration is including DC, Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands, and Puerto Rico in its list.
Ok, they can’t figure out the difference between a US territory and a district but it isn’t that bad.
taney71 on November 17, 2009 at 12:37 PM
Maybe these are districts that just have an ACORN office.
la.rt.wngr on November 17, 2009 at 12:38 PM
I though McCain would have made all these folks famous by now.
faraway on November 17, 2009 at 12:38 PM
As the numbers 69 and 99 turn up so often, I might imagine those numbers were used as placeholders by data entry clerks to mean “unknown”.
As for the defunct districts, there’s just no excuse for that. Maybe they are sneaking stealth Congressmen into the house. I mean, with so many from the 57 states, having an extra player or two on the field might go unnoticed.
crosspatch on November 17, 2009 at 12:39 PM
To hell with jerrymandering within a limited region. Obama’s breaking through to “new dimensions”.
maverick muse on November 17, 2009 at 12:39 PM
In a piece I read on this earlier, the gov’t reported new jobs in Arizona’s 15th District. Except AZ had only eight Congressional Districts.
Liam on November 17, 2009 at 12:39 PM
I’ll say this again. There are no phantom districts. What the Obama folks did was include the FIVE US controlled territories in its count of 440 which are DC, Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands, and Puerto Rico.
Not that big of a deal.
taney71 on November 17, 2009 at 12:40 PM
Messiah Magic
faraway on November 17, 2009 at 12:40 PM
6.4 Billion dollar theft?
jp on November 17, 2009 at 12:40 PM
What is the referential point for this inaccuracy?
maverick muse on November 17, 2009 at 12:41 PM
The 6.4 billion dollar question: When do the prosecutions and impeachments begin?
farright on November 17, 2009 at 12:43 PM
“Here’s a stimulus success story: In Arizona’s 15th congressional district, 30 jobs have been saved or created with just $761,420 in federal stimulus spending. At least that’s what the Web site set up by the Obama administration to track the $787 billion stimulus says.
Share
Discrepancies on government web site call into question stimulus spending.
There’s one problem, though: There is no 15th congressional district in Arizona; the state has only eight districts.”
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/jobs-saved-created-congressional-districts-exist/story?id=9097853
Liam on November 17, 2009 at 12:43 PM
Send these cheap, lying, no-good, rotten, four-flushing, low-life, snake-licking, dirt-eating, inbred, overstuffed, ignorant, blood-sucking, dog-kissing, brainless, dickless, hopeless, heartless, fat-ass, bug-eyed, stiff-legged, spotty-lipped, worm-headed sacks of monkey sh!t directly to prison.
tru2tx on November 17, 2009 at 12:43 PM
I would guess that there are other things that the administration is getting wrong like the example you give. However, this “phantom” district thing isn’t one of them other than Obama not being able to tell the difference between a territory and a district.
Of course Obama’s people can’t count or do basic fact checking on job counts either but this issue should be way down the list of problems conservatives have with the White House and Democrats.
Does it help prove they are sloppy and careless? Yes. But that’s about it. Including US controlled territories is the right thing to do since the stimulus bill impacted all of the country.
taney71 on November 17, 2009 at 12:44 PM
This is just a thinly veiled attempt to pander to the phantom vote.
Geochelone on November 17, 2009 at 12:44 PM
UM NO… they mentioned districts that didn’t exist in specific states. Did you even read the article?
MobileVideoEngineer on November 17, 2009 at 12:45 PM
Ed, just claim you live in one of those extra districts. Then don’t pay any income taxes on the basis that you don’t have a representative for your district, and thus have taxation without representation.
Weight of Glory on November 17, 2009 at 12:45 PM
Not that big of a deal.
taney71 on November 17, 2009 at 12:40 PM
Ignorance is bliss until you require everyone else to forfeit knowledge and wisdom to conform with stupidity.
Think again.
There’s a huge distinction between the responsible legalities separating a territory from a state.
Otherwise, why would any American territory ever have petitioned to become a state, or petitioned to remain a territory?
maverick muse on November 17, 2009 at 12:45 PM
The 99th Congressional district of Puerto Rico?
The 99th Congressional district of North Dakota?
The 15th Congressional district of Arizona?
Nice try on the spin, but even Congressional Democrats are now blasting this.
In fact, administration officials have already conceded the mistakes.
amerpundit on November 17, 2009 at 12:46 PM
So district 99 from ND is in one of the listed above? District 15 from AZ?
anuts on November 17, 2009 at 12:46 PM
claim you live in one of those extra districts. Then don’t pay any income taxes on the basis that you don’t have a representative for your district, and thus have taxation without representation.
Weight of Glory on November 17, 2009 at 12:45 PM
maverick muse on November 17, 2009 at 12:47 PM
Are you really that moronic or are you just spinning?
The database isn’t just listing 440 districts, which can be reached by adding territories to the actual number.
It’s listing non-existent districts, like the 15th district of Arizona. It doesn’t exist. The administration is already conceding the errors. Congressional Democrats are demanding answers.
amerpundit on November 17, 2009 at 12:47 PM
Oh, and give back your tax cuts. With interest.
Akzed on November 17, 2009 at 12:47 PM
Liberal Transparency on Parade Baby!
canopfor on November 17, 2009 at 12:48 PM
Joe Biden,the bus honks for thee…
freemarketlibertine on November 17, 2009 at 12:48 PM
Wonder who has the contract for the database administration. Ed’s already reported on the connections that got Smartronix the web design (and millions in “less-than-competitive” government contracts) — without having web design expertise.
obladioblada on November 17, 2009 at 12:48 PM
-large marble bouncing to a stop- sound.
johnnyU on November 17, 2009 at 12:48 PM
Where’s all that money?
loudmouth883 on November 17, 2009 at 12:48 PM
Yeah…but, but Palin lied about consulting her whole family, or just her girls?…or her parents?… about running for veep or something.
That’s so much more important. /sarc
pugwriter on November 17, 2009 at 12:49 PM
taney71 on November 17, 2009 at 12:44 PM
What do US controlled territories have to do with ALL of the bogus districts???? Case in point:
tru2tx on November 17, 2009 at 12:49 PM
Ok, so did Obama just get caught giving the money to his friends, or is this more of his administration’s noted incompetence and a reporting error?
18-1 on November 17, 2009 at 12:49 PM
Calling John Stossel
faraway on November 17, 2009 at 12:49 PM
By Obama’s method, there are 114 states, compounding by double count as we breath.
maverick muse on November 17, 2009 at 12:50 PM
The new wingnut standard for government accountability: pretty sure
Well, I’m pretty sure you don’t a clue what you’re talking about.
Ronnie on November 17, 2009 at 12:50 PM
After 2010…unless ACORN comes through big for the Dems…
18-1 on November 17, 2009 at 12:50 PM
It’s not just the number of districts. There’s not some counter that shows 440 districts. It’s listing specific districts that simply don’t exist.
It doesn’t matter if you can reach 440 by adding territories to current districts.
Recovery.gov specifically lists South Carolina’s 7th district receiving $27 million in funds. There is no 7th district in South Carolina.
amerpundit on November 17, 2009 at 12:50 PM
Meanwhile, Generalisimo & Mme Ochavez will announce, following his retirement, that they are building a modest summer villa at Martha’s Vineyard.
james23 on November 17, 2009 at 12:51 PM
A few people have responded to what I posted so I’ll just respond here.
In terms of counting spending and jobs the legal differences between a territory and district mean little. It’s about counting the spending and jobs “created” in the areas listed.
I am not defending the administration and I believe they were sloppy and careless not to make that distinction but that error isn’t a fatal flaw.
I never said there weren’t other mistakes made. I am just saying that the 440 number didn’t create “phantom districts” but was the result of sloppy staffers not doing there jobs.
taney71 on November 17, 2009 at 12:52 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 3 Next »