Politics Daily: How Palin could win the nomination

posted at 4:31 pm on November 16, 2009 by Allahpundit

She told Oprah that it’s “not on my radar screen right now,” but … c’mon. It’s on everyone’s radar screen. Walter Shapiro games out the path to victory: Sweep to victory in Iowa on the evangelical vote, concede New Hampshire to Romney, then throw everything she’s got at the deep-red linchpin of South Carolina. Win there and you’ve got big mo heading into winner-take-all Florida; if Huck, Mitt, and a few others are still hanging around by then, they might split the anti-Palin vote several ways and she could squeak to victory with less than 40 percent, giving her likely unstoppable momentum the rest of the way. Easy peasy!

Except for this. From ABC/WaPo’s new poll:

palin-def

By comparison, only 42 percent said they definitely wouldn’t vote for the highly polarizing Hillary Clinton in July 2006. Those “definitely not” numbers will soften up a bit over time, but (a) it’s not, shall we say, optimal to start with a clear majority of the electorate dug in against you, and (b) I’m surprised at how small the “definitely” faction is. Statistically, it makes sense: If 40 percent of the country considers itself conservative and, say, 15-20 percent of those people are devoted Sarahcuda supporters, then you’re right in the ballpark, but it’s a testament to how vocal Palin fans are in defending her that their numbers seem a lot stronger than they actually are. More ABC:

Today 43 percent of Americans express a favorable opinion of Palin overall, while 52 percent see her unfavorably. Favorability is the most basic measure of a public figure’s popularity; in politics, where majorities win, it’s trouble when it goes negative, as it’s been for Palin since October 2008…

Palin moreover fails a basic hurdle on the road to the White House, were she to choose to take it: Just 38 percent of Americans see her as qualified to serve as president; 60 percent think she’s not qualified for the job

Just under a quarter of Republicans rule out supporting her for president; that rises to half of independents and three-quarters of Democrats. And 61 percent of Republicans see Palin as qualified for the presidency – an underwhelming score in her own party, and one that falls to 37 percent of independents and 22 percent among Democrats.

The silver lining: Some of these numbers are actually an improvement over recent polls. PPP’s latest temperature check on 2012 had her favorables at 36/51, with independents split 34/48. ABC’s poll, by contrast, has her up to 45 percent approval among indies, a number that’s bound to rise as the backlash to Hopenchange statism pulls more of them towards the right. Maybe the book buzz is starting to polish her image? As for that 60 percent figure on qualifications, it too is an improvement (a double-digit improvement, in fact) over CNN’s notoriously gruesome poll result from last month. The bad news? CNN re-polled the question this week to coincide with her book launch and the current number who say she’s unqualified is still 70 percent, with only 29 percent of independents bucking the trend. (A majority of Republicans, 54/44, think she’s ready to serve, but 63 percent say the same about Mitt and Huck by comparison.)

Long story short, as things stand, she’s a threat to win the GOP nomination but an almost certain loser in the general election unless economic conditions have deteriorated to the point where any Republican would be a threat to knock off Obama. But if any Republican would stand a good chance of winning, why would the GOP nominate the one Republican who would galvanize the Democrats in opposition? The more beatable Obama looks, the greater the temptation will be to nominate an inoffensive “electable” candidate like Romney and make the election a referendum on The One’s record; the less beatable Obama looks, the greater the temptation to roll the dice and nominate a lightning rod like Palin who can draw media attention away from Obama. Exit question one: Er, why would she (or anyone else) want to run if Obama doesn’t look beatable, i.e. if the economy starts coming back and unemployment begins to decrease? Exit question two: If Obama does look beatable, what can the RNC do to tilt the table away from Palin and towards some more “electable” candidates? Follow the Shapiro link and read the end for a few ideas.

Update: Ah, I missed this earlier. Even more evidence, this time via Rasmussen, that the book might be helping her rebound: Among likely voters, her favorables are 51/43. That’s starkly different from the poll of polls at Pollster.com, but likely voters are ultimately the only ones who matter.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

I will vote for the person most detested by cultural and political elites.

vinman on November 16, 2009 at 4:32 PM

Are you there ann?

txag92 on November 16, 2009 at 4:34 PM

I love it when the Left is giving the Right advice.

It’s like the two indians at the crossroads. You know one is from a tribe that always lies to strangers, and the other one is from a tribe that never lies. How do you get directions as to which road to take?

Ask either one what the other would say, and do the opposite.

So how could Sarah get elected? By running, regardless of what the leftoons say.

Akzed on November 16, 2009 at 4:36 PM

Rasmussen poll on Sarah Palin

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/toplines/pt_survey_toplines/november_2009/toplines_sarah_palin_november_13_14_2009

National Survey of 1,000 Likely Voters
Conducted November 13-14, 2009

Do you have a very favorable, somewhat favorable, somewhat unfavorable or very unfavorable impression of Sarah Palin?

21% Very favorable
30% Somewhat favorable
14% Somewhat unfavorable
29% Very unfavorable
5% Not sure

LurkerDood on November 16, 2009 at 4:36 PM

Why not post the Rasmussen poll?

BPD on November 16, 2009 at 4:37 PM

The GOP could exhume Nixon and he’d get my vote against Obama.

JammieWearingFool on November 16, 2009 at 4:37 PM

And of course AP misses the Rasmussen poll of 1,000 likely voters:

51% combined favorables, to 43% combined unfavorables.

Enoxo on November 16, 2009 at 4:37 PM

Echo!

Enoxo on November 16, 2009 at 4:37 PM

2012 might not be her year,..it all depends on how far left we tilt till then. Nothing else too exciting on the horizen.
She may be more effective as a kingmaker in 2012.

a capella on November 16, 2009 at 4:38 PM

Does anyone else notice how the only polls Allah links to, are the unreliable ones?

MarkTheGreat on November 16, 2009 at 4:38 PM

ALLAH!

you forget

the 2012 gop nomination is PALIN-LOADED with WESTERN STATES

AFTER the ‘first 3′: iowa, nh, sc… its PALIN COUNTRY

NEVADA
IDAHO
ALASKA
MONTANA
N DAKOTA
S DAKOTA
WYOMING
NEBRASKA
HAWAII
W virginia
vt
delaware
ri
maine

so………….

tailor made for her!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_(United_States)_presidential_primaries,_2012

battleoflepanto1571 on November 16, 2009 at 4:38 PM

Yawn. Typical of Allah to rehash dated unreliable polls to fit his Palin meme.

Latest poll (out today) from America’s most reliable pollster:

Palin Favorable/Unfavorable 51/43 – Better than Obama

Norwegian on November 16, 2009 at 4:39 PM

I will vote for the person most detested by cultural and political elites.

vinman on November 16, 2009 at 4:32 PM

Yeah? Not the person whose policy ideas you like best?

Does anyone else notice how the only polls Allah links to, are the unreliable ones?

What’s unreliable about these polls? Give me specifics.

Allahpundit on November 16, 2009 at 4:39 PM

LurkerDood on November 16, 2009 at 4:36 PM

Did Rasmussen over-poll democrats?

Holger on November 16, 2009 at 4:39 PM

First of all, the election in 2012 is going to be a referendum on Obama and liberalism, not on Sarah. All she needs to do is win the primary and show up at the general election. Enthusiasm counts, and having millions of devoted fans excited about your candidacy is hardly a handicap.

Plus, you can’t win if you never play, and conservatives have been itching to play since 1988. 2012 is our turn.

Finally, as far as the GOP “establishment”, they have to face the fact that they may not win with Sarah, but they will definitely lose with her against them.

joe_doufu on November 16, 2009 at 4:40 PM

She isn’t running. Even if she hadn’t resigned, she would be hit by the experience card. And before 10 bazillion people shout “Obama didn’t have a lot of experience either”, let me state the obvious: Illinois’s high population and his academic pedigree gave him cover. And even then, Hillary almost beat him.

Speedwagon82 on November 16, 2009 at 4:40 PM

Long story short, as things stand, she’s a threat to win the GOP nomination but an almost certain loser in the general election unless economic conditions have deteriorated to the point where any Republican would be a threat to knock off Obama.

Uh, hello? Unemployment is 10.2% and rising. We’re running trillion plus dollar deficits. Many states are on the verge of bankruptcy. Economic conditions have already deteriorated.

I don’t give a rat’s ass who runs against Obama. If people re-elect this idiot when things are this bad, then sign me up for the Secessionist Party of Texas.

Doughboy on November 16, 2009 at 4:41 PM

I don’t want her to run for President.

She’s far more important than that.

Red Cloud on November 16, 2009 at 4:41 PM

Yep, the beltway boys could pick the RINO du jour to run against Palin, but if the base figures that out they’re done. They would be better off dealing with Palin rather than plotting against her, but they’d have to have brains to take that course.

littleguy on November 16, 2009 at 4:41 PM

The GOP better play nice with Sarah, or she could destroy them single handed. They are on the verge of a comeback, and if they go to war with Palin the party will never recover.

If she is not the Nominee, she will be getting a cabinet position minimum and the VP slot at most.

portlandon on November 16, 2009 at 4:41 PM

I will vote for the person most detested by cultural and political elites.

vinman on November 16, 2009 at 4:32 PM
//
Same here,whoever the media is afraid of and the elitists hate,that’s the one.

ohiobabe on November 16, 2009 at 4:41 PM

Exit question one: Er, why would she (or anyone else) want to run if Obama doesn’t look beatable, i.e. if the economy starts coming back and unemployment begins to decrease?

if that should occur, I think the KSM show trials in NYC could be the sleeper for dear leader…

cmsinaz on November 16, 2009 at 4:42 PM

Allahpundit on November 16, 2009 at 4:39 PM

rabble rabble rabble

Joe Caps on November 16, 2009 at 4:42 PM

Why not post the Rasmussen poll?

BPD on November 16, 2009 at 4:37 PM

Hmmmmmmmmm.

the_nile on November 16, 2009 at 4:43 PM

What’s unreliable about these polls? Give me specifics.

Allahpundit on November 16, 2009 at 4:39 PM

ABC’s poll has a few issues:

#1 – OBAMA has a lower ‘would you vote for him number’ than PALIN

#2 – though not published, abc has been routinely skewing their Dem sample in 2009 to something like D+10 or D+11… remember, on election day, the BEST time to be a dem in a generation, the voting populace was D+7.

you REALLY believe that 4% more of america(or 6 MILLION voters) are NOW democrats that WERENT democrats on election day?

if so, i got a bridge to sell you in brooklyn………….

battleoflepanto1571 on November 16, 2009 at 4:43 PM

Good plan, Vinman! I’m with you. The more they hate, the more I like!

They just don’t get it. The charade is over; you cannot fight real, which is what Palin is. They know it and are shaking. They can use the unattractive pics, photoshop, whatever, she still shines. I’m loving it!

texanpride on November 16, 2009 at 4:44 PM

Allahpundit on November 16, 2009 at 4:39 PM

Why not link the Rassmussen poll as well? I like those numbers better,…so their poll must be true.

portlandon on November 16, 2009 at 4:44 PM

And even then, Hillary almost beat him.

Speedwagon82 on November 16, 2009 at 4:40 PM

A lot of Hillary supporters I met say “Hillary beat him in the Primaries. Obama beat her in the Convention.”

Holger on November 16, 2009 at 4:45 PM

This post will get 500 comments, 150 of which will be from AnninCA, getalife, Dave Rywall & company.

OhioCoastie on November 16, 2009 at 4:46 PM

If Palin can’t be elected President, then NO conservative can be elected to that office and Gingrich and the RINOs are correct.

If the only candidates who can be elected are democrat liberals with an ‘R’ after their name, then I have no interest left for politics or anyone’s opinion.

Have a nice future.

Skandia Recluse on November 16, 2009 at 4:46 PM

Considering the MSM is arrayed against her, that 53% is understandable. But now with her book out and a chance to go on the talk shows and get her side of the story out, we will see what happens.

rbj on November 16, 2009 at 4:47 PM

Good plan, Vinman! I’m with you. The more they hate, the more I like!

They just don’t get it. The charade is over; you cannot fight real, which is what Palin is. They know it and are shaking. They can use the unattractive pics, photoshop, whatever, she still shines. I’m loving it!

texanpride on November 16, 2009 at 4:44 PM

Considering that the smallest minority is the individual, one would think that for the sake of ‘Diversity’ they would in favor of the individual, right?

The Left know that it has to destroy Sarah Palin because she represents the individual – she is rugged individualism personified.

Juno77 on November 16, 2009 at 4:47 PM

Speedwagon82 on November 16, 2009 at 4:40 PM

I agree that Illinois’ population gives Obama a bit of cover, but if journalists had any credibility, it wouldn’t. Have you been to the South Side of Chicago? Have you seen the wretched conditions that people who live in his state senate district live in?

I would put Sarah’s experience in Alaska up against Obama’s pre-presidential experience any day. People need to wake up to the cesspool of graft and corruption that is Chicago and Illinois politics and stop giving Obama cover just because he’s from a populous state. He did NOTHING to help the people of Illinois, just as he is doing NOTHING to help the people of the United States now.

That is why, in answer to exit question number one, Republicans should be eager to run against this turkey. He’s going to have to defend his record, and it’s not a pretty one.

NebCon on November 16, 2009 at 4:48 PM

By comparison, only 42 percent said they definitely wouldn’t vote for the highly polarizing Hillary Clinton in July 2006.

Allah, just out of curiosity, was that 2006 poll taken before or after Hillary made it clear she was intending to run for office?

I only ask because for right now, Palin’s scoring a lot higher in the unfavorable polls than any other ex-Gov. citizen with a facebook page that isn’t running for office.

Those numbers might, you know, change a little.

DrAllecon on November 16, 2009 at 4:49 PM

Oh and to answer the question of how Palin could win the nomination. Just show up. The woman can draw thousands of people everywhere she goes. On a good day, her crowds number in the tens of thousands. And let’s not forget those millions of books she’s selling.

It stands to reason that if she has this kind of drawing power, she can get at least some of those people to vote for her at the polls. Add to that the sorry competition she has for the nomination(Romney, Huckster, Steve Perry), and she’d have to do a string of Couric-esque interviews to blow this.

Doughboy on November 16, 2009 at 4:49 PM

If the left continues to drive into the left ditch. A ham sandwich with a R behind her name can win.

tjexcite on November 16, 2009 at 4:49 PM

I will vote for the person most detested by cultural and political elites.

vinman on November 16, 2009 at 4:32 PM

Yeah? Not the person whose policy ideas you like best?

Allahpundit on November 16, 2009 at 4:39 PM

What’s the difference?

Ronnie on November 16, 2009 at 4:50 PM

Her political career is “Finished”.

joshlbetts on November 16, 2009 at 4:51 PM

Yeah? Not the person whose policy ideas you like best?

What’s unreliable about these polls? Give me specifics.

Allahpundit on November 16, 2009 at 4:39 PM

Hey watch it. Don’t make eye contact with these folks, whether it is the good one or the eye that crooks inward a bit. You wouldn’t want to get rabies.

LevStrauss on November 16, 2009 at 4:51 PM

I think Doc Zero nailed it the other night. All she has to do is to be the conservative antithesis to a statist liberal agenda, rebut Obama when he steps out of line (which is like every damn day) and she can win just like Obama did, by being the anti-incumbent. The public is nearing Obama fatigue, he’s overexposed, underperforming and way overpromising just about everything.

All that she has to do is to vocalize a clear, conservative alternative to his bullshit policies via facebook, book tour and voila’ just like AP sums it up above–Iowa, SC, Florida and blamo! Helllo, President Palin.

*Staples Easy Button press*NOW*

ted c on November 16, 2009 at 4:52 PM

If Obama keeps tanking, by 2012 the DNC may tank Obama in favor of Hillary.

Speakup on November 16, 2009 at 4:52 PM

The \’Cuda and Rick Perry (Gov. of Texas) – her for Prez, Perry for VP – wow. That\’s a team to save this country!

Cinday Blackburn on November 16, 2009 at 4:52 PM

If a muslim cleric runs for president in 2012, how likely are you to positively vote for him, possibly vote for him, not vote for him for sure, sell your vote to ACORN, not sure until Obama tells you how to vote?

Cybergeezer on November 16, 2009 at 4:53 PM

TROLL ALERT

Great a Palin post. Now Dot on ADD (AnninCa) will be all over it. Get ready for all kinds of nonsensical BS, talking points, and everything including the kitchen sink will be throw all over the place. I predict a 2000 plus comment thread.

Please just once IGNORE HER!!!

milwife88 on November 16, 2009 at 4:53 PM

Anyone who was running figure in the presidential election of 2008 in either the primary or general election should stay out of the 2012 election… if she wants to run she should wait till 2016 or 2020… put this in perspective… age wise, John McCain running in 2008 is like Palin running in 2036… John McCain would have just turn 100 years old if Palin ran for president the same age McCain ran for president…

ninjapirate on November 16, 2009 at 4:53 PM

Anyone who was running figure

Anyone who was a running figure…

ninjapirate on November 16, 2009 at 4:53 PM

All I am saying is that with TURKMANBAMA at the helm, he has opened the door for ANY incompetant to now be President. The bar is as low as it can go.

I understand the inner war of Palinistas and those who whom don’t agree, BUT I’d still like to see proof that she is the idiot the media (and hense, their braindead obama-bot followers) portrays her to be. I haven’t been convinced yet.

Gob on November 16, 2009 at 4:54 PM

Hey Michael Steele doin anything about closin the primaries?
Nope? Didn’t think so, so all my dough goes to Sarah and conservatives NO RINO’s need apply!
Hear that McCain quit stalking me you old fool!

dhunter on November 16, 2009 at 4:54 PM

The \’Cuda and Rick Perry (Gov. of Texas) – her for Prez, Perry for VP – wow. That\’s a team to save this country!

Cinday Blackburn on November 16, 2009 at 4:52 PM

My dream ticket is Palin/Rubio(assuming he wins the Senate race). Imagine the Dems and media(I know, I’m being redundant) attempting to paint the GOP as the party of angry white males with a ticket like that.

Doughboy on November 16, 2009 at 4:54 PM

I will vote for the person most detested by cultural and political elites.

vinman on November 16, 2009 at 4:32 PM
Yeah? Not the person whose policy ideas you like best?

Allahpundit on November 16, 2009 at 4:39 PM

I’ll ask Allah this question and I’m sure he will jump in and answer.
What different policy postions( foreign or domestic) will Sarah have that Thompson/Huckabee/Romeny would not?.
What exactly would she do in office that so scares you and your ilk?

kangjie on November 16, 2009 at 4:54 PM

Allahpundit will end up and crawl on his knees to Palin, begging for a job during the campaign. Watch and see if I’m not right.

At least Ed has his standards.

Sarah will decide after midterms if the environment is right. With the way money is being printed right now, I can’t see how the Porkulus bails these clowns out.

victor82 on November 16, 2009 at 4:55 PM

… if she wants to run she should wait till 2016 or 2020…

ninjapirate on November 16, 2009 at 4:53 PM

I could see that happening.

portlandon on November 16, 2009 at 4:56 PM

Hey, remember those polls that said Rudy would be the next president?

jimmy the notable on November 16, 2009 at 4:57 PM

Palin will not win the nomination. She is a nice woman with strong values and formitable talent, but the country will recognize she is not presidential material.

I like her, but not for POTUS.

saiga on November 16, 2009 at 4:57 PM

I understand the inner war of Palinistas and those who whom don’t agree, BUT I’d still like to see proof that she is the idiot the media (and hense, their braindead obama-bot followers) portrays her to be. I haven’t been convinced yet.

Gob on November 16, 2009 at 4:54 PM

So true; The media is responsible for Obama being in office, so you can bet the person the media is attacking the most is the best pick.

Cybergeezer on November 16, 2009 at 4:58 PM

My dream ticket is Palin/Rubio(assuming he wins the Senate race). Imagine the Dems and media(I know, I’m being redundant) attempting to paint the GOP as the party of angry white males with a ticket like that.

Doughboy on November 16, 2009 at 4:54

Please. That’s for Nancy-boys.

I want Palin to kick the media and the D’s right in the sharpies again with her Blahniks and nominate Darth for another go-round. Can you see Biggus Dickus and Biden. Can you say “Who’s your Daddy?”

If not Darth, then daughter of Darth, the Mighty Liz!

victor82 on November 16, 2009 at 4:58 PM

Palin has a fairly direct path to the nomination. It’s beating Obama that won’t just happen without tons of real hard work and a strategy for convincing doubters. The biggest danger to her chances is the potential for her team to yes her to death. Her supporters can see no wrong in her, there’s a good chance her team will as well.

ernesto on November 16, 2009 at 4:59 PM

She needs to ask a simple question:

Based our economic condition over the last 20 years, considering the massive deficits, the incestuous corruption and greed of the Ivy League crowd and the Washington DC crowd, the shambles of the manufacturing sector and the billions (if not trillions) of wasted tax payer dollars….

what have the geniuses of the Harvard and Yale crowd accomplished beyond creating more and more complex ways to game the increasingly dysfunctional and corrupt system?

Isn’t it time for someone who has raised a family and knows how to balance a checkbook?

rickyricardo on November 16, 2009 at 4:59 PM

Palin will not win the nomination. She is a nice woman with strong values and formidable talent, but the country will recognize she is not presidential material.
I like her, but not for POTUS.
saiga on November 16, 2009 at 4:57 PM

And the bowing Community organizer is?

Juno77 on November 16, 2009 at 5:00 PM

Of the 52% that see her ‘unfavorably’ – how many of those think that Tina Fey and Sarah Palin are the same person?

mudskipper on November 16, 2009 at 5:00 PM

The Rasmussen polls support the notion that this story hasn’t been written yet. (I wonder what “you won’t have Dick Nixon to kick around”‘s numbers were in ’65 – if anyone even bothered to ask.)

But the horse race isn’t the only political question. The question is whether and how to strengthen what Palin represents. Under many scenarios – though the party types will rarely understand and never admit it – an electoral failure may do more to advance the movement and its influence than a lesser failure with a “moderate.” The Goldwater comparison is ahistorical – unless you imagine Joe Biden or maybe Hillary as an LBJ figure, running to safeguard an assassinated Obama’s supposed legacy, or other such speculative fantasies.

If Palin commands equal or greater support in 2011-2, she should run, let the voters decide the issue, and ignore the superficial and self-interested speculation about whether it’s good or bad for the party or whether she’s likely to win.

CK MacLeod on November 16, 2009 at 5:00 PM

Palin will not win the nomination. She is a nice woman with strong values and formitable talent, but the country will recognize she is not presidential material.

I like her, but not for POTUS.

saiga on November 16, 2009 at 4:57 PM

Saiga, look who is the President. NO ONE CAN BE WORSE OR MORE LACKING IN ANYTHING IN THE UNIVERSE.

He has lowered the bar so low ANYONE can run no matter how unqualified.

Gob on November 16, 2009 at 5:00 PM

I will vote for the person most detested by cultural and political elites.

vinman on November 16, 2009 at 4:32 PM

Exactly!

sisterchristian on November 16, 2009 at 5:01 PM

I don’t care what anyone says, I love allahpundit.

IU_Conservative on November 16, 2009 at 5:01 PM

Of the 52% that see her ‘unfavorably’ – how many of those think that Tina Fey and Sarah Palin are the same person?

mudskipper on November 16, 2009 at 5:00 PM

Considering it was either NBC or CBS(or both) that actually used SNL clips instead of footage of Palin when doing stories on her during the election, I’ll wager quite a few people in the media don’t know the difference.

I’ll give Alec Baldwin the benefit of the doubt and assume he was in on the joke when he confused the two on SNL.

Doughboy on November 16, 2009 at 5:02 PM

Palin will not win the nomination. She is a nice woman with strong values and formitable talent, but the country will recognize she is not presidential material.

I like her, but not for POTUS.

Agreed.

I’d personally like to see Petraeus run, sweep the nomination and absolutely, ruthlessly, crush Obama in the presedential election.

Now that’s something that actually could happen.

You-Eh-Vee on November 16, 2009 at 5:02 PM

60 percent think she’s not qualified for the job…

I thought it was 72% a couple of weeks ago…

ddrintn on November 16, 2009 at 5:03 PM

Sarah already has better favorable ratings than the sitting president according to Rasmussen.

She also has far more enthusiasm, grassroot support and fundraising ability than any other potential GOP contender for the 2012 nomination.

The only question that should be asked is not whether “should Palin run in 2012?” but rather “Why shouldn’t she?”

Politics is a timing game, and Palin’s time is now. Not 2016 or 2020.

Norwegian on November 16, 2009 at 5:03 PM

mudskipper on November 16, 2009 at 5:00 PM

I’m sure the same dummies that voted for Obama think Sarah Palin stars on “30 Rock”.

Cybergeezer on November 16, 2009 at 5:04 PM

I don’t care what anyone says, I love allahpundit.

IU_Conservative on November 16, 2009 at 5:01 PM

Alright Allah, that cost you $5 bucks? Was it worth it? /

portlandon on November 16, 2009 at 5:04 PM

Re those polls–it’s EARLY. Flashback to November 2005–who would have thought that the next President would be Barack Obama? It was shortly after the Katrina debacle, but the war in Iraq hadn’t really gone south yet, and people were wondering whether the next President would be George Allen or Bill Frist, neither of whom are now in the Senate.

Sarah Palin made a sensation among conservative voters when she was first introduced, and handily won the debate against Joe Biden, but she was unprepared for the vicious attacks of the mainstream media, after enjoying fairly friendly press in Alaska.

IMHO, resigning the Governorship of Alaska was a blunder, because it gave her the reputation as a quitter.

But her book, and the recent interviews will probably attract attention to her again, and she no longer has the McCain campaign telling her what to do. She can definitely galvanize conservatives, and can probably act as a “kingmaker” in the 2010 elections by endorsing and campaigning for House and Senate candidates who share her ideas.

After that, it’s up to her to speak to lots of voters (not only conservatives, but independents) while boning up on issues that she didn’t encounter in Alaska.

By 2012, after nearly four years of Obama socialism, Republicans will be the party of “change”. If Republicans can win the House, and enough Senate seats to sustain filibusters in 2010, they can slam on the brakes on spending and become the party of fiscal responsibility. Whether Sarah Palin has what it takes to win the Presidency remains to be seen. But if not, she would make a great Energy Secretary in a Romney Administration.

Steve Z on November 16, 2009 at 5:05 PM

Meh.

spmat on November 16, 2009 at 5:05 PM

If for nothing else, than just seeing the heads of all those thousands of conceited leftist gasbags (who hate her) explode, it would be great to see her elected. I also think she’d do a pretty good job. If you want something scary to think about, think about a President Biden.

RBMN on November 16, 2009 at 5:05 PM

Her supporters can see no wrong in her, there’s a good chance her team will as well.

ernesto on November 16, 2009 at 4:59 PM

Her detractors can see no right in her. That’s why they’re bound for defeat, regardless of whether Palin runs or just supports the one who does.

littleguy on November 16, 2009 at 5:06 PM

And the bowing Community organizer is?

Point is well taken, but the media will never back Palin like they did with the chosen one.

If the media had any remaining integrity and actually had reported on facts instead of fairytale bullshit, America would have chosen McCain – or at the very least, Hillary.

Obama is living proof that the power of hype is more important that than proven track records.

You-Eh-Vee on November 16, 2009 at 5:06 PM

The more beatable Obama looks, the greater the temptation will be to nominate an inoffensive “electable” candidate like Romney and make the election a referendum on The One’s record

Give me a break. Romney’s more unelectable than Mike friggin’ Huckabee. What’s Romney going to run on, opposition to state-run or state-mandated health care?

ddrintn on November 16, 2009 at 5:07 PM

Since when did anyone start believing agenda polling from the WaPo?

Weren’t we told how smart slo Joe was?

tarpon on November 16, 2009 at 5:07 PM

This Oprah interview will do more for Sarah Palin than 100 hours of appearances on Fox News. She looked good and very comfortable and was not burdened with having to ridicule a popular President (a la Sean Hannity).

I expect her numbers to improve.

Decider on November 16, 2009 at 5:08 PM

rickyricardo on November 16, 2009 at 4:59 PM

I like your style.

BetseyRoss on November 16, 2009 at 5:08 PM

I’d personally like to see Petraeus run, sweep the nomination and absolutely, ruthlessly, crush Obama in the presedential election.

You-Eh-Vee on November 16, 2009 at 5:02 PM

Save us, General Powell Petraeus!!!

I’ve heard that tune before.

ddrintn on November 16, 2009 at 5:09 PM

Give me a break. Romney’s more unelectable than Mike friggin’ Huckabee. What’s Romney going to run on, opposition to state-run or state-mandated health care?

ddrintn on November 16, 2009 at 5:07 PM

The “Voted for it before I voted against it” led Kerry to victory..

the_nile on November 16, 2009 at 5:09 PM

Her supporters can see no wrong in her,
ernesto on November 16, 2009 at 4:59 PM

And you know this How?

Juno77 on November 16, 2009 at 5:09 PM

ABC-PPP-CNN…

allahpundit, can you pick a poll from the other side of the fence for once?

while I’m at it…why are we going to the enemy to help pick who we nominate for leadership?

what’s next…let’s ask osama bin laden who we should use to command in afghanistan?

warhorse_03826 on November 16, 2009 at 5:09 PM

Her detractors can see no right in her. That’s why they’re bound for defeat, regardless of whether Palin runs or just supports the one who does.

littleguy on November 16, 2009 at 5:06 PM

Goes both ways. Obama Derangement Syndrome will be the downfall of the GOP in 2012.

Decider on November 16, 2009 at 5:10 PM

They better take Sarah serious…

Right Wing Women Rock

Cool short rock vid

deedtrader on November 16, 2009 at 5:10 PM

Well, man ( Allahpundit and like-minded types ), Something is happenin’ here and it ain’t exactly here, as the Buffalo Springfield

NO ONE has ever been held to this level of Hysterical Scrutiny and vilification by the Leftover Media.

Polls can be accurate or not, but they never measure INTENSITY

Janos Hunyadi on November 16, 2009 at 5:11 PM

I’d personally like to see Petraeus run, sweep the nomination and absolutely, ruthlessly, crush Obama in the presedential election.

You-Eh-Vee on November 16, 2009 at 5:02 PM

Save us, General Powell Petraeus!!!

I’ve heard that tune before.

ddrintn on November 16, 2009 at 5:09 PM

I think he could be a good VP for Palin.

the_nile on November 16, 2009 at 5:12 PM

Polls can be accurate or not, but they never measure INTENSITY

Janos Hunyadi on November 16, 2009 at 5:11 PM

Yep, ask Hillary CLinton about that.

ddrintn on November 16, 2009 at 5:12 PM

Goes both ways. Obama Derangement Syndrome will be the downfall of the GOP in 2012.
Decider on November 16, 2009 at 5:10 PM

How is disagreeing with bowing Community organizer derangement?

Is he supposed to get carte blanch for 4 years?

Juno77 on November 16, 2009 at 5:13 PM

Her supporters can see no wrong in her,
ernesto on November 16, 2009 at 4:59 PM

Wrong, as usual. I support her but I see a lot of area for improvement. I support Rudy even more, and see even more areas for improvement in him. I’ll settle for Romney rather than O, but there’s lotsa room for upgrades there

Palin-haters always reveal themselves, because she literally makes them Cray-zee. ( That’s what I like best about her )

Janos Hunyadi on November 16, 2009 at 5:14 PM

Help us, Zombie Reagan.

You’re our only hope.

Good Lt on November 16, 2009 at 5:14 PM

What really tarnished McCain most of all, for me, is the poor quality of his campaign staff. He’s the one that hired these clowns. They may’ve been smart, but they were always too “smart” by half. They had no core principles that I can see. Just lots of scheming and cynicism. No wonder Palin couldn’t stand these backbiting jerks.

RBMN on November 16, 2009 at 5:14 PM

Is he supposed to get carte blanch for 4 3 years?

FTFY

Good Lt on November 16, 2009 at 5:15 PM

Flame me if you want, but we still have to consider: Is she really qualified? I have no doubt that she is more qualified than the current oval office occupant, but come on, set the bar a little lower would you.

Bush was governor of a big-ass state, and he still had a lot of trouble getting things done with a supposedly friendly congress. I like Palin’s instincts and her basic free market beliefs, but is it really enough? I had no doubt that she could be a good VP, especially when set against that airhead Biden, but I don’t know if she is up for leading the ticket.

holdfast on November 16, 2009 at 5:18 PM

I would vote for Palin if she could get the nomination, but I doubt if she can get it. Besides, I think it is too soon to think about it. Who knows if she even wants it in 2012?

Terrye on November 16, 2009 at 5:20 PM

Goes both ways. Obama Derangement Syndrome will be the downfall of the GOP in 2012.

Decider on November 16, 2009 at 5:10 PM

Umm, NO because there are millions of reasons for ODS (otherwise known as THE TRUTH) and there really wasn’t any truth to be deranged over Bush. Goebbels would have been so proud of THAT propaganda display.

The Media is getting more and more Orwellian (or just plain WRONG) everyday.

Look at Columbine. Or maybe this link will put brown in one’s pants…
http://www.esquire.com/features/john-demjanjuk-1109

Gob on November 16, 2009 at 5:22 PM

I like Palin’s instincts and her basic free market beliefs, but is it really enough? I had no doubt that she could be a good VP, especially when set against that airhead Biden, but I don’t know if she is up for leading the ticket.

holdfast on November 16, 2009 at 5:18 PM

I think if she could handle the entrenched “good old boys” and big oil interests in Alaska … then she certainly can handle anything thrown her way.

darwin on November 16, 2009 at 5:22 PM

Palin has a shot. My advice to her would be to lay off the media for now. She should cozy up to them on her book tour. Apologize for speaking against them at the convention. When she wins the nomination, she should attack, attack. In the primaries, the media can sink her, either criticize her stump speeches or ignore her altogether. If she wins the nomination, that will not be an option for the media. She should be reading everything in print right now, send some opinion pieces to favorable papers and keep the face book going non stop, (only with writings of substance). She should also be aware of traps set by her competition “D”s and “R”s. A few church visits in the south, a NASCAR race appearance or two and another book aimed at Jr. High and High School kids that explains conservatism and liberalism in lay terms and highlight the differences without degrading the liberal ideas. Of course, I could be wrong though.

Guest1.1 on November 16, 2009 at 5:22 PM

What’s unreliable about these polls? Give me specifics.

Allahpundit on November 16, 2009 at 4:39 PM

No Allah. You don’t get away with that one.

YOU cited the ABC-WaPo poll. Given the known bias of these two propaganda outlets, and their history of skewed samples and other poll gaming, the burden is on YOU to defend the credibility of these ABC-WaPo numbers. Particularly in light of the contrary numbers coming from the fare more consistent and reliable Rasmussen.

Or does your contempt for Palin make it impossible for you to be objective where she is concerned?

novaculus on November 16, 2009 at 5:22 PM

Bush was governor of a big-ass state, and he still had a lot of trouble getting things done with a supposedly friendly congress. I like Palin’s instincts and her basic free market beliefs, but is it really enough? I had no doubt that she could be a good VP, especially when set against that airhead Biden, but I don’t know if she is up for leading the ticket.

holdfast on November 16, 2009 at 5:18 PM

I don’t know if Palin’s running, either. Ever. But I would say that I go more for someone with core beliefs (Reagan) than some legislative wizard (LBJ).

ddrintn on November 16, 2009 at 5:23 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3