<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The obligatory &#8220;Newsweek dumps all over Palin&#8221; post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 09:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Newsweek editor: Our Palin cover wasn&#8217;t sexist</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2959242</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Newsweek editor: Our Palin cover wasn&#8217;t sexist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2959242</guid>
		<description>[...] defense of how the cover &#8220;conveys&#8221; what Newsweek was saying. Really? The point of Meacham&#8217;s and Thomas&#8217;s pieces was that she&#8217;s leading a dead-end right-wing populist movement that&#8217;s widening the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] defense of how the cover &#8220;conveys&#8221; what Newsweek was saying. Really? The point of Meacham&#8217;s and Thomas&#8217;s pieces was that she&#8217;s leading a dead-end right-wing populist movement that&#8217;s widening the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skylark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2958542</link>
		<dc:creator>skylark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2958542</guid>
		<description>More Sarah respecting the flag?  Sure!

&lt;a href=&quot;http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/.a/6a00d83451c45669e2011570a779d9970c-popup&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;2008 calendar&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More Sarah respecting the flag?  Sure!</p>
<p><a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/.a/6a00d83451c45669e2011570a779d9970c-popup" rel="nofollow">2008 calendar</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skylark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2958516</link>
		<dc:creator>skylark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2958516</guid>
		<description>Wow, six pages of comments, and only one commenter has the least bit of discomfort with Palin standing next to a flag tossed like a beach towel over a bar stool and using it as an elbow rest. 

Hey, it&#039;s not touching the ground!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, six pages of comments, and only one commenter has the least bit of discomfort with Palin standing next to a flag tossed like a beach towel over a bar stool and using it as an elbow rest. </p>
<p>Hey, it&#8217;s not touching the ground!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LODGE4</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2957282</link>
		<dc:creator>LODGE4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2957282</guid>
		<description>What the hell is a “neocon?” This is a term that I only ever hear from leftists and I’ve never ever actually been able to find a real meaning for the word. It seems to be a leftist nothing-word. A term designed to trigger a emotional response, but otherwise devoid of meaning.

leereyno on November 16, 2009 at 8:17 AM

Leereyno - are you serious? Google Neoconservatism and you will see that it has been around for a few decades now and Irving Kristol, the father of neoconservatism, was hardly a liberal. Neocon is not a derogatory word - it&#039;s a political philosophy. 

By the way, Sarah looks very beautiful on that magazine cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the hell is a “neocon?” This is a term that I only ever hear from leftists and I’ve never ever actually been able to find a real meaning for the word. It seems to be a leftist nothing-word. A term designed to trigger a emotional response, but otherwise devoid of meaning.</p>
<p>leereyno on November 16, 2009 at 8:17 AM</p>
<p>Leereyno &#8211; are you serious? Google Neoconservatism and you will see that it has been around for a few decades now and Irving Kristol, the father of neoconservatism, was hardly a liberal. Neocon is not a derogatory word &#8211; it&#8217;s a political philosophy. </p>
<p>By the way, Sarah looks very beautiful on that magazine cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zoyclem</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2957252</link>
		<dc:creator>zoyclem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2957252</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So much hype for a book that is practically being given away on amazon. The angry white losers haven’t had anything to celebrate for a long, long time. This is a big deal for them i guess.

simplesimon on November 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In simplesimon&#039;s attempt to belittle others, he instead belittles himself, and demonstrates his own bigotry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So much hype for a book that is practically being given away on amazon. The angry white losers haven’t had anything to celebrate for a long, long time. This is a big deal for them i guess.</p>
<p>simplesimon on November 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>In simplesimon&#8217;s attempt to belittle others, he instead belittles himself, and demonstrates his own bigotry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mo_gunslinger</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2956941</link>
		<dc:creator>mo_gunslinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2956941</guid>
		<description>The choice of photo for the cover of this week&#039;s Newsweek is unfortunate. When it comes to Sarah Palin, this &quot;news&quot; magazine has relished focusing on the irrelevant rather than the relevant. The Runner&#039;s World magazine one-page profile for which this photo was taken was all about health and fitness - a subject to which I am devoted and which is critically important to this nation. The out-of-context Newsweek approach is sexist and oh-so-expected by now. If anyone can learn anything from it: it shows why you shouldn&#039;t judge a book by its cover, gender, or color of skin. The media will do anything to draw attention - even if out of context. 

- Sarah Palin
Facebook 16-Nov-09</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The choice of photo for the cover of this week&#8217;s Newsweek is unfortunate. When it comes to Sarah Palin, this &#8220;news&#8221; magazine has relished focusing on the irrelevant rather than the relevant. The Runner&#8217;s World magazine one-page profile for which this photo was taken was all about health and fitness &#8211; a subject to which I am devoted and which is critically important to this nation. The out-of-context Newsweek approach is sexist and oh-so-expected by now. If anyone can learn anything from it: it shows why you shouldn&#8217;t judge a book by its cover, gender, or color of skin. The media will do anything to draw attention &#8211; even if out of context. </p>
<p>- Sarah Palin<br />
Facebook 16-Nov-09</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redslippers</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2956757</link>
		<dc:creator>redslippers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2956757</guid>
		<description>Idiots will believe Palin actually posed like that for the cover of Newsweek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Idiots will believe Palin actually posed like that for the cover of Newsweek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blacksmith8</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2956533</link>
		<dc:creator>Blacksmith8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2956533</guid>
		<description>I have a message for Juan McShame.
John,

Your campaign racked up legal costs in Alaska and said repeatedly it would pay for them. When the bill was submitted, it was turned down after the election. Your campaign said it would have paid if you had won.

Real men, gentlemen, and officers are men of their word. What are you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a message for Juan McShame.<br />
John,</p>
<p>Your campaign racked up legal costs in Alaska and said repeatedly it would pay for them. When the bill was submitted, it was turned down after the election. Your campaign said it would have paid if you had won.</p>
<p>Real men, gentlemen, and officers are men of their word. What are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pseudonominus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2955829</link>
		<dc:creator>pseudonominus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2955829</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Does Newsweek think a similar picture of Michelle Obama flay across barcode scanners like this one will? 

I.M. Shatner on November 16, 2009 at 5:16 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, because Michelle Obama&#039;s ass is far too large.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Does Newsweek think a similar picture of Michelle Obama flay across barcode scanners like this one will? </p>
<p>I.M. Shatner on November 16, 2009 at 5:16 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>No, because Michelle Obama&#8217;s ass is far too large.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Budvis</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2955803</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Budvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2955803</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But it’s no coincidence the Eisenhower ’50s and Reagan ’80s were periods of unusual peace and prosperity.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Shows you how much they hate SP, according to heretofore lib view, the &#039;80s were a time of rising homlessness and a blind eye towards AIDS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But it’s no coincidence the Eisenhower ’50s and Reagan ’80s were periods of unusual peace and prosperity.</p></blockquote>
<p>Shows you how much they hate SP, according to heretofore lib view, the &#8217;80s were a time of rising homlessness and a blind eye towards AIDS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I.M. Shatner</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2955712</link>
		<dc:creator>I.M. Shatner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2955712</guid>
		<description>Does Newsweek think a similar picture of Michelle Obama flay across barcode scanners like this one will? 

Visualize MyBelle in a runners outfit striking a cutesy pose next to an American flag...

CORRECTION: Visualize MyBelle in a runners outfit striking a cutesy pose next &lt;strike&gt;to an American flag&lt;/strike&gt;...


2nd CORRECTION: Visualize MyBelle in a runners outfit &lt;strike&gt;striking a cutesy pose next to an American flag&lt;/strike&gt;...

There.  Listen to those cash registers, baby! I expect the White House will be demanding said tribute to &quot;The Gun Show&quot; post haste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Newsweek think a similar picture of Michelle Obama flay across barcode scanners like this one will? </p>
<p>Visualize MyBelle in a runners outfit striking a cutesy pose next to an American flag&#8230;</p>
<p>CORRECTION: Visualize MyBelle in a runners outfit striking a cutesy pose next <strike>to an American flag</strike>&#8230;</p>
<p>2nd CORRECTION: Visualize MyBelle in a runners outfit <strike>striking a cutesy pose next to an American flag</strike>&#8230;</p>
<p>There.  Listen to those cash registers, baby! I expect the White House will be demanding said tribute to &#8220;The Gun Show&#8221; post haste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s Sarah Week &#171; Cosmopolitan Conservative</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2955351</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s Sarah Week &#171; Cosmopolitan Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2955351</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: Hot Air pretty much says the same thing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: Hot Air pretty much says the same thing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xax</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2955104</link>
		<dc:creator>xax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2955104</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm.  This post is still up... Does that have anything to do with the Newsweek cover???

I.... wonder.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm.  This post is still up&#8230; Does that have anything to do with the Newsweek cover???</p>
<p>I&#8230;. wonder&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kissmygrits</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2954926</link>
		<dc:creator>Kissmygrits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2954926</guid>
		<description>Gee, and the lib media ate up Obummer in a swim suit surfing in Hawaii.  I thought Sarah&#039;s picture was in better taste. Not photo shopped either, to make certain improvements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, and the lib media ate up Obummer in a swim suit surfing in Hawaii.  I thought Sarah&#8217;s picture was in better taste. Not photo shopped either, to make certain improvements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dasher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2954915</link>
		<dc:creator>Dasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2954915</guid>
		<description>What I want to know is why that Runners World photo in not in my Sarah Palin calendar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I want to know is why that Runners World photo in not in my Sarah Palin calendar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnninCA</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2954549</link>
		<dc:creator>AnninCA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2954549</guid>
		<description>Palin supporters refute AP article, point by point.

It&#039;s a really good read.

Check it out on Conservatives4Palin blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palin supporters refute AP article, point by point.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a really good read.</p>
<p>Check it out on Conservatives4Palin blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnninCA</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2954531</link>
		<dc:creator>AnninCA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2954531</guid>
		<description>Wow, it&#039;s Sarah news 24-7 elsewhere.  Her line-up this week is hot, hot, hot.  And then a big bustour to small-town America.

I thought she was smart to whet people&#039;s appetite by staying off the interview circuit.

Looks like I was right!

Fun stuff, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, it&#8217;s Sarah news 24-7 elsewhere.  Her line-up this week is hot, hot, hot.  And then a big bustour to small-town America.</p>
<p>I thought she was smart to whet people&#8217;s appetite by staying off the interview circuit.</p>
<p>Looks like I was right!</p>
<p>Fun stuff, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orange</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2954499</link>
		<dc:creator>orange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2954499</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I wonder, does the fact that independents are starting to break big towards the right affect the conventional wisdom on where, precisely, the moderate middle is located these days...?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
No, it shows that &quot;independent&quot; does not mean &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;centrist&quot;.  Hoffman is an independent, as he is not a Republican or Democrat.  So is Bernie Sanders.

The break you describe is happening because Republicans are leaving the party in search of an option that will satiate the far-right cravings fueled by talk radio and such.  This does not significantly affect where the center is.  It just means that some races that could be won by Republicans will be won by Democrats since Republican votes will be drained off by far-right third party (i.e., &quot;independent&quot;) challengers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I wonder, does the fact that independents are starting to break big towards the right affect the conventional wisdom on where, precisely, the moderate middle is located these days&#8230;?</p></blockquote>
<p>No, it shows that &#8220;independent&#8221; does not mean &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;centrist&#8221;.  Hoffman is an independent, as he is not a Republican or Democrat.  So is Bernie Sanders.</p>
<p>The break you describe is happening because Republicans are leaving the party in search of an option that will satiate the far-right cravings fueled by talk radio and such.  This does not significantly affect where the center is.  It just means that some races that could be won by Republicans will be won by Democrats since Republican votes will be drained off by far-right third party (i.e., &#8220;independent&#8221;) challengers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldleprechaun</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2954380</link>
		<dc:creator>oldleprechaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2954380</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If left wing nuts knew how to read, then they would be right wing “Nuts”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I challenge!  

How &#039;bout; 

&quot;If left wing nuts knew how to &lt;strike&gt;read&lt;/strike&gt;  THINK, then they would be right wing “Nuts”&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If left wing nuts knew how to read, then they would be right wing “Nuts”</p></blockquote>
<p>I challenge!  </p>
<p>How &#8217;bout; </p>
<p>&#8220;If left wing nuts knew how to <strike>read</strike>  THINK, then they would be right wing “Nuts”&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Z</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2954263</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2954263</guid>
		<description>How do you solve a problem like Sarah Palin?

Listen to her. She knows how to solve lots of problems. There&#039;s only one problem she hasn&#039;t solved yet--the media. 

We&#039;ve had other Governors resign their office under far more scandalous circumstances, such as Jim McGreevy and Eliot Spitzer, and Mark Sanford probably won&#039;t be far behind. 

Yet the left-wing press continues to bash Sarah Palin, while Spitzer, McGreevy, and Sanford have dropped off the radar screen--why? Because they know that, if Sarah Palin became more media-savvy and got her message out clearly without having to rebut personal attacks, her ideas would catch on with the general public (including independents) and she would be unstoppable. If the left-wing press really believed she was a dimwit or a right-wing nut, they would ignore her. They bash her now because they are AFRAID of her!

&lt;blockquote&gt;Reagan piously gave lip service to the right-wing social agenda while doing nothing to further it by legislation; &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Reagan did what he could. The House was controlled by Democrats throughout Reagan&#039;s two terms, and the social agenda is controlled by the Supreme Court, and Reagan tried to name Robert Bork to the Court.

&lt;blockquote&gt;The “Gipper” talked tough about the Russians–while doing more than any other president to foster détente.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Reagan talked tough to the Soviet leaders during his first term to force them to back down. Up through 1983, he was dealing with hard-liners Brezhnev and Andropov, and he decided to end the butt-kissing of the Carter years. He also talked tough with Gorbachev early on, and walked out of talks with him in Reykjavik, but when Gorbachev backed off and made concessions, Reagan was brought back to the bargaining table. Reagan&#039;s motto was &quot;peace through strength&quot;, and he exemplified it perfectly. If you&#039;re the strongest kid on the block, no one wants to mess with you, and that&#039;s the best way to ensure peace.

Unfortunately, the lefties at Snooze-weak haven&#039;t figured that out, 20 years after Reagan left office.  




he also chose George H.W. Bush to be his vice president and allowed the ultrapragmatic James A. Baker III to run the White House. The “Gipper” talked tough about the Russians–while doing more than any other president to foster détente.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you solve a problem like Sarah Palin?</p>
<p>Listen to her. She knows how to solve lots of problems. There&#8217;s only one problem she hasn&#8217;t solved yet&#8211;the media. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve had other Governors resign their office under far more scandalous circumstances, such as Jim McGreevy and Eliot Spitzer, and Mark Sanford probably won&#8217;t be far behind. </p>
<p>Yet the left-wing press continues to bash Sarah Palin, while Spitzer, McGreevy, and Sanford have dropped off the radar screen&#8211;why? Because they know that, if Sarah Palin became more media-savvy and got her message out clearly without having to rebut personal attacks, her ideas would catch on with the general public (including independents) and she would be unstoppable. If the left-wing press really believed she was a dimwit or a right-wing nut, they would ignore her. They bash her now because they are AFRAID of her!</p>
<blockquote><p>Reagan piously gave lip service to the right-wing social agenda while doing nothing to further it by legislation; </p></blockquote>
<p>Reagan did what he could. The House was controlled by Democrats throughout Reagan&#8217;s two terms, and the social agenda is controlled by the Supreme Court, and Reagan tried to name Robert Bork to the Court.</p>
<blockquote><p>The “Gipper” talked tough about the Russians–while doing more than any other president to foster détente.</p></blockquote>
<p>Reagan talked tough to the Soviet leaders during his first term to force them to back down. Up through 1983, he was dealing with hard-liners Brezhnev and Andropov, and he decided to end the butt-kissing of the Carter years. He also talked tough with Gorbachev early on, and walked out of talks with him in Reykjavik, but when Gorbachev backed off and made concessions, Reagan was brought back to the bargaining table. Reagan&#8217;s motto was &#8220;peace through strength&#8221;, and he exemplified it perfectly. If you&#8217;re the strongest kid on the block, no one wants to mess with you, and that&#8217;s the best way to ensure peace.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the lefties at Snooze-weak haven&#8217;t figured that out, 20 years after Reagan left office.  </p>
<p>he also chose George H.W. Bush to be his vice president and allowed the ultrapragmatic James A. Baker III to run the White House. The “Gipper” talked tough about the Russians–while doing more than any other president to foster détente.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrMagnolias</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2954253</link>
		<dc:creator>DrMagnolias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2954253</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;AntonK on November 15, 2009 at 2:59 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Please let&#039;s not do what people did (and continue to do) with Obama. I like Sarah Palin, and she is a knockout, but I haven&#039;t seen any evidence for &quot;brilliant.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>AntonK on November 15, 2009 at 2:59 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Please let&#8217;s not do what people did (and continue to do) with Obama. I like Sarah Palin, and she is a knockout, but I haven&#8217;t seen any evidence for &#8220;brilliant.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dark-Star</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2954172</link>
		<dc:creator>Dark-Star</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2954172</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;popularpeoplesfront on November 16, 2009 at 12:06 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Her or Ron Paul. Take your pick.

We just haven&#039;t got that many choices, and even less who have a snowball&#039;s chance at actually winning elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>popularpeoplesfront on November 16, 2009 at 12:06 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Her or Ron Paul. Take your pick.</p>
<p>We just haven&#8217;t got that many choices, and even less who have a snowball&#8217;s chance at actually winning elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hawksruleva</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2954152</link>
		<dc:creator>hawksruleva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2954152</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ve been looking at all the candidates running for the House, Senate and Governors. There is a lot of diversity within the GOP candidates: new faces, diverse opinions, people from very different backgrounds, and some WoT vets. 

Loxodonta on November 15, 2009 at 9:33 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sen. McConnell had a good observation on this Sunday. Wallace asked if the GOP was in trouble because of Palin and conservative attempts to take over the party. He said it showed that more and more people believe that it&#039;s worth running for GOP offices, and that had to be good for the party.

I think the &quot;old white guys&quot; will each deal with the conservative shift in the party in their own way. The some  will leave, some will try to join the movement, and lots of GOP lawmakers will quietly thank God for the chance to finally follow their conscience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’ve been looking at all the candidates running for the House, Senate and Governors. There is a lot of diversity within the GOP candidates: new faces, diverse opinions, people from very different backgrounds, and some WoT vets. </p>
<p>Loxodonta on November 15, 2009 at 9:33 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Sen. McConnell had a good observation on this Sunday. Wallace asked if the GOP was in trouble because of Palin and conservative attempts to take over the party. He said it showed that more and more people believe that it&#8217;s worth running for GOP offices, and that had to be good for the party.</p>
<p>I think the &#8220;old white guys&#8221; will each deal with the conservative shift in the party in their own way. The some  will leave, some will try to join the movement, and lots of GOP lawmakers will quietly thank God for the chance to finally follow their conscience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hawksruleva</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2954138</link>
		<dc:creator>hawksruleva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2954138</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;A few years from now, little children will be saying “Daddy, what was Newsweek”?


molonlabe28 on November 15, 2009 at 1:35 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ask a kid today, or even a grownup. The only place you see Newsweek is doctor&#039;s office waiting rooms, and even there, it&#039;s being pushed aside by outdoors, sports, people, and other mags.

The SNL skits made it into the public consciousness. But a lot of the dirt thrown up by the media is only being consumed by news junkies and die-hard partisans. We get mad about it, the left gets titillated by it, and the average voter never notices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A few years from now, little children will be saying “Daddy, what was Newsweek”?</p>
<p>molonlabe28 on November 15, 2009 at 1:35 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Ask a kid today, or even a grownup. The only place you see Newsweek is doctor&#8217;s office waiting rooms, and even there, it&#8217;s being pushed aside by outdoors, sports, people, and other mags.</p>
<p>The SNL skits made it into the public consciousness. But a lot of the dirt thrown up by the media is only being consumed by news junkies and die-hard partisans. We get mad about it, the left gets titillated by it, and the average voter never notices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnninCA</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/14/the-obligatory-newsweek-dumps-all-over-palin-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2954097</link>
		<dc:creator>AnninCA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=72537#comment-2954097</guid>
		<description>Sarah gets a nice review in the WS Journal:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704431804574537882681089404.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah gets a nice review in the WS Journal:</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704431804574537882681089404.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704431804574537882681089404.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
