Quotes of the day
posted at 9:30 pm on November 14, 2009 by Allahpundit
“All in all, Ms. Palin emerges from ‘Going Rogue’ as an eager player in the blame game, thoroughly ungrateful toward the McCain campaign for putting her on the national stage. As for the McCain campaign, it often feels like a desperate and cynical operation, willing to make a risky Hail Mary pass in order to try to score a tactical win, instead of making a considered judgment as to who might be genuinely qualified to sit a heartbeat away from the Oval Office…
“Yet, Mr. McCain’s astonishing decision to pick someone with so little experience (less than two years as the governor of Alaska, and before that, two terms as mayor of Wasilla, a town with fewer than 7,000 residents) as his running mate and Ms. Palin’s own surprisingly nonchalant reaction to Mr. McCain’s initial phone call about the vice president’s slot (she writes that it felt “like a natural progression”) underscore just how alarmingly expertise is discounted — or equated with elitism — in our increasingly democratized era, and just how thoroughly colorful personal narratives overshadow policy arguments and actual knowledge.”
***
“The Palin problem, then, might be that she cynically incites a crowd that she has no real intention of pleasing. If she were ever to get herself to the nation’s capital, the teabaggers would be just as much on the outside as they are now, and would simply have been the instruments that helped get her elected. In my own not-all-that-humble opinion, duping the hicks is a degree or two worse than condescending to them. It’s also much more dangerous, because it meanwhile involves giving a sort of respectability to ideas that were discredited when William Jennings Bryan was last on the stump. The Weekly Standard (itself not exactly a prairie-based publication) might want to think twice before flirting with popular delusions and resentments that are as impossible to satisfy as the demand for a silver standard or a ban on the teaching of Darwin, and are for that very reason hard to tamp down. Many of Palin’s admirers seem to expect that, on receipt of the Republican Party nomination, she would immediately embark on a crusade against Wall Street and the banks. This notion is stupid to much the same degree that it is irresponsible…
“Once again, one is compelled to ask which would be worse: a Sarah Palin who really meant what she merely seemed to say, or a Sarah Palin who would say anything at all for a cheap burst of applause?”
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 3 … 6 Next »
Oh boy,another SarahCuda thread!!
canopfor on November 14, 2009 at 9:32 PM
I didn’t know I was a hick…
repvoter on November 14, 2009 at 9:35 PM
will this woman ever be vindicated? God only knows…
Liberty 5-3000 on November 14, 2009 at 9:35 PM
And the irony here is, Barack Obama is precisely this. Projection much?
A better QoTD can be here:
Limbaugh: ‘Rogue’ Is ‘Truly One Of The Most Substantive Policy Books I’ve Read’
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_111309/content/01125107.guest.html
Sharr on November 14, 2009 at 9:36 PM
Well, that’s how we ended up with the unqualified president that we’re stuck with for the next three years.
Wethal on November 14, 2009 at 9:36 PM
“Just Words….Just Words….” -TOUS
alexraye on November 14, 2009 at 9:36 PM
Yes… we must be pragmatic as we’ve been for quite some time now… that is the only solution.
MeatHeadinCA on November 14, 2009 at 9:36 PM
Memoir Is Palin’s Payback to McCain Campaign
“Going Rogue,” the title of Sarah Palin’s erratic new memoir, comes from a phrase used by a disgruntled McCain aide to describe her going off-message during the campaign: among other things, for breaking with the campaign over its media strategy and its decision to pull out of Michigan, and for speaking out about reports that the Republican Party had spent more than $150,000 on fancy designer duds for her and her family. In fact, the most sustained and vehement barbs in this book are directed not at Democrats or liberals or the press, but at the McCain campaign. The very campaign that plucked her out of Alaska, anointed her the Republican vice-presidential nominee and made her one of the most talked about women on the planet — someone who could command a reported $5 million for writing this book.
============================================================
Its an attempt to strike from within,and to create infighting amongst the Right,and is another angle of
attack,by LibTards!!!
canopfor on November 14, 2009 at 9:36 PM
Are these reviewers reading the ObaMao books?
Evidence?
onlineanalyst on November 14, 2009 at 9:36 PM
I just can’t help be amused at how everything say accuse Sarah Palin of being it is more accurately applied to Barack Obama. Do these people listen to themselves?
Sharr on November 14, 2009 at 9:37 PM
That about sums it up right there.
Grow Fins on November 14, 2009 at 9:38 PM
Obama described to absolute perfection! A Big Narcissistic Zero…who bows to thugs, terrorists and emperors!
Schadenfreude on November 14, 2009 at 9:38 PM
Let me be clear: These people are scared sh*tless.
Metro on November 14, 2009 at 9:38 PM
We care about the little people…
the_nile on November 14, 2009 at 9:39 PM
Nothing against the woman but frankly, I wish she would go away. We need a serious contender for the GOP. She isn’t it. I understand that she wants to grab hold of her celebrity and make the most of it while she has the chance. More power to her. BUT the GOP needs a very strong, very experienced, very competent, very honorable, very courageous leader. Who is it? It’s not her.
scalleywag on November 14, 2009 at 9:39 PM
I see Newsweek couldn’t contain it’s inner 13 year old
darii on November 14, 2009 at 9:39 PM
Wait, is this an Obama thread?
BacaDog on November 14, 2009 at 9:40 PM
smells like sulphur and fear…
right4life on November 14, 2009 at 9:40 PM
Et tu, Christopher?
IrishEi on November 14, 2009 at 9:40 PM
Obama in a perfect nutshell.
He’s our narcissistic zero, who bows to th*gs, ter*o*ists and emperors.
Schadenfreude on November 14, 2009 at 9:40 PM
You know if they actually bought their own lies that Sarah Palin was of no consequence they’d know enough to shut about her and “move on”. I see FEAR!
Sharr on November 14, 2009 at 9:40 PM
She’s already been vindicated. Watch her convention speech and listen to her predictions about zer0bama.
SouthernGent on November 14, 2009 at 9:40 PM
Like bow to an emporer?
Wethal on November 14, 2009 at 9:40 PM
Of course you didn’t.
That’s why rou’re so easily duped by Sarah/
Seriously, Rush is right, the left will always tell you who they are most afraid of.
billy on November 14, 2009 at 9:41 PM
Oh goody. The New York Times and Newsweek weigh in with their wisdom.
It’s going to kill the NYT when it has to publish its best-seller list with her book in the #1 position.
yogi41 on November 14, 2009 at 9:41 PM
Moby. You have to get over Schuzzefackva.
the_nile on November 14, 2009 at 9:41 PM
She should buy ads showing them again.
the_nile on November 14, 2009 at 9:43 PM
Great!
The condescension is breathtaking. I just love being talked down to by bigoted know-it-alls who don’t know a damn thing.
NYTimes and Newsweek are teh suck.
hillbillyjim on November 14, 2009 at 9:43 PM
Fify, gratis, and so easily
Schadenfreude on November 14, 2009 at 9:43 PM
What is it with liberals and being completely blind to their own hypocrisy. Hello! 2 years as senator + personal narrative = BO.
If I didn’t know better, I’d have come to the conclusion liberal media had become infiltrated by undercover conservatives parodying the left. Unfortunately that quote was written without a sense of irony.
jhffmn on November 14, 2009 at 9:43 PM
*blows dust off fingertips*
My, my, this Palin character is so declasse. Whatever do these flyover state rubes find so intoxicating in her drivel, that they presume to get off their tractors and express their ideas — they must know its their duty to leave such serious political thoughts to their betters in the media.
*clucks tongue*
/media
brak on November 14, 2009 at 9:43 PM
I’m still confused. Are you sure this isn’t an Obama thread?
BacaDog on November 14, 2009 at 9:43 PM
This is a joke, right? It was insulting enough that her experience(or lack thereof) was used by the drive-bys last year to disqualify her from being VP, while the guy heading the opposing ticket had an even thinner resume. But now after Obama’s first year in office has been an unmitigated disaster, these people really wanna double down on that card?
I didn’t used to believe this, but I think this whole “experience” argument is starting look a little too misogynistic. Or at least it appears to stem from a bias against a conservative woman. Has any man, Republican or Democrat, ever been accused of being unqualified as much as Palin? Hell, Romney only had one term as governor. And he’s been out of office for 3 years. Where are all the charges from the media that he’s not ready for prime time?
Doughboy on November 14, 2009 at 9:44 PM
You Could not find one descent review for some balance?
Amadeus on November 14, 2009 at 9:44 PM
Teabaggers?!
Has Hitchens gone back to the dark side altogether?
IrishEi on November 14, 2009 at 9:45 PM
Look, Hitch you always want to take seriously as a critic from the Left. Remember, however, he approves of Obamist socialism.He\’s on the side of the angels when it comes to the War, though. You must give him that. The Times critic is the Times critic.
victor82 on November 14, 2009 at 9:45 PM
She is a politician, marking her ground. At this stage she doesn’t need policies – she needs attitude, which she has aplenty.
OldEnglish on November 14, 2009 at 9:46 PM
Palin’s Facebook post
I sometimes wonder with the quote king Allah, if he worships Allah?
njpat on November 14, 2009 at 9:46 PM
I’m pretty tired of the stupid hicks meme.
Where were these kind of journalistic observations regarding Obama’s 2008 run?
jix on November 14, 2009 at 9:47 PM
This brief historical reflection takes care of the lazy charge, made by Matthew Continetti in his new book, The Persecution of Sarah Palin,that liberal dislike of his heroine is no more than “a distaste for those who hail from outside America’s coastal metropolises; a revulsion toward people who do not aspire to adopt the norms, values, politics, and attitudes of the Eastern cultural elite.” Gruening’s career also illustrates the major difference between a solid résumé and a perilously emaciated one.
===========================================================
Ya,Sarah hails from Alaska,but there are many more Sarahs
that could be from Texas,Minnesota,Michigan,and every other
State that prides itself for hunting/fishing,snowmobile trails,fly-in camps and everything else outdoors!!!
canopfor on November 14, 2009 at 9:47 PM
You mean like the guy that just won the *presidency* on the Dem ticket?
I’m still amazed (maybe not) that the ‘media’ think Palin’s ‘inexperience’ is *bad*, but Obama’s inexperience is, well, a reason to call you a racist if you point it out because it’s really not a problem for anyone that isn’t a knuckle-dragging mouth-breather, and if we could just see the difference, we’d be enlightened like them!
Midas on November 14, 2009 at 9:47 PM
It’s a thread done by Allah, welcome to hot air.
These threads are officially in roll your eyes territory.
Ya, we get it the media STILL can’t stand her. It’s not rocket science.
We get it that Allah wants us to believe she can’t win cuz the libs tell him so.
B Man on November 14, 2009 at 9:48 PM
I think Newsweek inadvertently gave Sarah the title for her Presidential memoirs. “Duping the Hicks”.
yogi41 on November 14, 2009 at 9:48 PM
Only 8 anti-Palin threads on the front page, you need, I think, two more to break your record.
Enoxo on November 14, 2009 at 9:48 PM
Interesting that a lot of these anti-Palin pundits will look back at Reagan with memories (I’m reading lately) of a person who knew how to do this or that (being generally pragmatic), but at the time, I sure remember this same type of media treatment, don’t you? He was to be fear because of his ultra-right, dogmatic approach to politics.
Not necessarily comparing Ms. Palin to Mr. Reagan, but he had a good team around him and they were able to push through it (though I can’t remember as many GOP’ers sniping at him they way they are at SP…maybe so, I just don’t remember it).
It’ll sure be interesting to see if Sarah has the right stuff as well. Hope she’s building a trusted supporting staff.
cranbone on November 14, 2009 at 9:48 PM
Knit 2 purl 3.
See previous thread. :)
katy the mean old lady on November 14, 2009 at 9:48 PM
No, it’s what Geralding Ferraro pointed out and was criticized by the Dems for speaking “truth to the powers that be” in the Dem party.
Wethal on November 14, 2009 at 9:49 PM
One of the things the Democrats will never understand, now that Palin is her own woman, is how their relentless attacks on her actually attract voters to her.
Palin, when alllowed to speak in her own words, is quite reasonable and an attractive candidate. Smart D’s like Axelrod get this, which is why they’ve been trying to take her out with Trig Truth and other nonsense.
The libtards have made the cardinal mistake of actually setting the bar real low. I can’t actually believe that they were this stupid.
Oh, wait. We’re talking about liberals. They always think they’re the smartest people in the room…
victor82 on November 14, 2009 at 9:49 PM
Ah, yes, Clark Clifford called Reagan the “amiable dunce.”
Wethal on November 14, 2009 at 9:50 PM
I sometimes wonder with the quote king Allah, if he worships Allah?
njpat on November 14, 2009 at 9:46 PM
njpat: AllahPundit worshipping Allah!
So,your accusing AllahPundit is a Jihady!
Well,good luck with that!!!!!!!!!!!
canopfor on November 14, 2009 at 9:50 PM
This lady is changing the world man. Changing the world.
milemarker2020 on November 14, 2009 at 9:50 PM
Aw ain’t it a shame considering Harper Collins is ordering a second printing already viz. Politic.
Clyde5445 on November 14, 2009 at 9:50 PM
Consider these badges of honor. Had the NYT and Newsweek given her good reviews, then she’d really have something to worry about.
Erich66 on November 14, 2009 at 9:50 PM
It was a joke, kinda.
njpat on November 14, 2009 at 9:51 PM
Allah needs him some Palin Love…..
victor82 on November 14, 2009 at 9:51 PM
you are right on those counts…but that’s not the vindication i’m looking for…i guess i’ll just have to accept that we may not have the privilege of being privy to the evil liberals karmic retribution…DAMMIT.
Liberty 5-3000 on November 14, 2009 at 9:51 PM
Oh boy,another SarahCuda thread!!
canopfor on November 14, 2009 at 9:32 PM
Knit 2 purl 3.
See previous thread. :)
katy the mean old lady on November 14, 2009 at 9:48 PM
katy the mean old lady: I`m watching you katy!!hehe:)
canopfor on November 14, 2009 at 9:51 PM
Well at least the NYT, Newsweek, et. al. are being consistent. Remember back in 04 how they dismissed John Edwards as just a pretty boy with no experience, and then in 08 how they railed on his personal problems and how a one-term senator had no business running for President and how…
Oh wait.
Nevermind.
billy on November 14, 2009 at 9:51 PM
Don’t discount Providence.
To whom are you going to listen? Jehoiakim and his successors’ prophets? Or Jeremiah?
davidk on November 14, 2009 at 9:52 PM
Duping those hicks? Does that mean the author concedes Palin is smart?
They just can’t win.
Black Yoshi on November 14, 2009 at 9:52 PM
Could we have more pics of, and less picking on, Sarah?
But you are right AP, we need to dupe the kids, the poor and the moderates, just like the liberal Dems do.
Counter to Alaska joke and seeing Russia:
Can you imagine leaving The City of Chicago on a reform mission to Washington DC? Or almost anywhere on earth for that matter?
The hilarious part is that nobody noticed the incongruity of it.
I am waiting to hear jokes like that on Letterman.
IlikedAUH2O on November 14, 2009 at 9:52 PM
The first quote from the NYT is from Michiko Kakutani.
You may be interested in reading this Slate review of Kakutani and her reviews!
INC on November 14, 2009 at 9:53 PM
For someone who’s just a dumb, irrelevant, inexperienced, lying, religious-nut, crack-pot, small town, trailer trash, beauty queen, quitter diva, Mrs. Palin sure is getting a lot of attention from the left wingers. Hmmmm, I wonder why?
ncborn on November 14, 2009 at 9:53 PM
Andrew Sullivan is playing the victim card by claiming that Palin wanted to sue him for libel.
He retort is that he “was just asking questions.”
Yep, that’s all he was doing.
Just as the birthers do. And the truthers.
SteveMG on November 14, 2009 at 9:53 PM
Contemplating Sarah’s intellect, or lack thereof, intentions, policies, influence, etc. might be fun or challenging, depending who’s at it; however, watching the left being terrorized by her is the sweet and telling.
Terrorize on Sarah!
Schadenfreude on November 14, 2009 at 9:54 PM
Barack Obama was a half-term senator with ZERO experience in balancing a state budget, overseeing a national guard, and was NEVER responsible for day-to-day decisions of being a mayor/govenor. Hell, he even waffled on casting his own senate votes by voting ‘present’ ;which was clearly of no use to the good people of Illinois!
TN Mom on November 14, 2009 at 9:54 PM
The Obama press got a pirated copy and are trying to paint the narrative.
I’m not playing that game.
I’m going to wait until I have the book and read it…and then I will decide for myself what to think of what I read.
How novel a concept is that these days anyway?
powerpro on November 14, 2009 at 9:54 PM
How do these people in the media take themselves seriously?They must be on some type of drugs …Mccains a fool for picking someone with/little/ experience as his VP…but the democratic party gets no criticism at all for picking someone with much less experience..as President???Lol these idiots need their asses kicked for real!Obama shows hes an empty suit,an incompetent idiot every day.But he dazzles the brainless by throwing out empty phrases containing BIG words!!OOOO!!!
theTarCzar on November 14, 2009 at 9:55 PM
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MTE2YmEyMDZkM2Y3NjAzYWZjOTRmYjExZDg4MGE0NzE=
Hmmm….maybe we can apply Mark Steyn’s comment here too.
njpat on November 14, 2009 at 9:55 PM
The review that will count: this Tuesday at 1 o’clock, she’ll be on Rush’s show.
varnson on November 14, 2009 at 9:56 PM
Funny, I don’t remember anyone at the NY Times making the “expertise” argument vis a vis Obama vs McCain. Hell, this:
is basically how Obama got elected in the first place, as well.
changer1701 on November 14, 2009 at 9:57 PM
The endgame was too important. The election of the first (half)black President was too big a story, and the fact that his politics were left of McGovern was the icing on the cake. So the media made up whatever narrative necessary to sell him to the public.
Suddenly ties to terrorists, anti-Semites, and racist preachers were no big deal. A complete lack of executive experience wasn’t a problem. A far left voting record was considered mainstream and pragmatic. And how dare anyone ask to see his real birth certificate or college transcripts?
The drive-bys hitched their wagon to the electoral equivalent of the Titanic and now they have to suffer the indignity of being dragged down with him. But they’re not about to go quietly. If it means smearing common, everyday Americans as “teabaggers” or doing everything they can to trash Sarah Palin, so be it. The next 3 years are going to be very ugly not just politically, but also in the way those events are covered by the media.
Doughboy on November 14, 2009 at 9:57 PM
“Yet, Mr. McCain’s astonishing decision to pick someone with so little experience (less than two years as the governor of Alaska, and before that, two terms as mayor of Wasilla, a town with fewer than 7,000 residents) as his running mate……..”
With Obama being elected, and with less experience, this whole point is moot. I the people that make this accusation don’t recognize that, they have a serious problem. As a President, Obama is proving why he’s not ready for prime time, with his comments overseas and his decisions on legislation at home.
Does anyone think Sarah Palin would have proposed a $787 billion stimulus package that did nothing, like Obama’s? I don’t even believe John McCain would have done that, but we’re not talking about him.
bflat879 on November 14, 2009 at 9:58 PM
Palins Book is already in its second printing. Eat sh!t and die Newsweek.
Amadeus on November 14, 2009 at 9:58 PM
It’s interesting that the NYT even reviewed it. Usually they ignore offerings from conservatives, and I don’t think they’ve ever reviewed anything O’Reilly wrote, even though he has a number of best-sellers. I guess she isn’t as irrelevant as advertised.
Erich66 on November 14, 2009 at 9:58 PM
ha ha ha
jaime on November 14, 2009 at 9:59 PM
Some fascinating news according to C4P–
Mike Allen at Politico reports:
A second printing of books already underway, and the book hasn’t even come out yet.
Enoxo on November 14, 2009 at 10:00 PM
Hey, don’t you know we’re not allowed to disagree with Mr. Better-Than-You Hitchens.
INC on November 14, 2009 at 10:00 PM
Ain’t we got fun?
I love seeing the whining tw*ts trying to grapple with SP.
Can I buy a vowel?
katy the mean old lady on November 14, 2009 at 10:02 PM
“nobody messes with Joe Gaffetastic Biden” -Obama
TN Mom on November 14, 2009 at 10:04 PM
From the end of the Hitchens piece:
Where did THAT come from?
CK MacLeod on November 14, 2009 at 10:04 PM
HarperCollins Orders Second Run of “Going Rogue”
Woot. The first run was 1.5 million copies. Not sure if the second printing is another 1.5 million.
A second printing before the book has even hit store shelves.
Cha Ching, ya that Frummy?
Geochelone on November 14, 2009 at 10:05 PM
Rush…on Going Rouge pre-interview.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcrJZAf0PXQ
njpat on November 14, 2009 at 10:06 PM
Wow, you mean she’s throwing people under the bus? That’s the sign of a weak mind and poor morals.
29Victor on November 14, 2009 at 10:07 PM
I think Hitchens has a point even though I don’t appreciate the way he wrote it. Her fan base right now is probably not going to like it when she has to move to center to appeal to a wider voter base. And, yes, if she wants any chance at being a serious contender for 2012 she’ll have to move to the center.
terryannonline on November 14, 2009 at 10:07 PM
I think Hitch has always been a social uber-leftie. His big change seemed to be his hawkish approach to Iraq and Afghanistan. These comments by him shouldn’t be too surprising to us.
This coming week reminds me of how it was before her big convention speech; “can she do it?”, “will she bomb?”, “what if she stumbles?”…etc. The left has definitely brought it up a few notches for this book release. Hope she brings her “happy Amazon warrior” game!
cranbone on November 14, 2009 at 10:08 PM
Wait… a Christian might believe in a Christian notion? How dare she. I’m not a Christian but Hitchens is being absurd here and asking of Palin something he’d never ask of any other I can bet.
Sharr on November 14, 2009 at 10:08 PM
If this can be answered on here, what is the derogatory meaning of “teabaggers”?
gina4 on November 14, 2009 at 10:08 PM
I think Newsweek inadvertently gave Sarah the title for her Presidential memoirs. “Duping the Hicks”.
yogi41 on November 14, 2009 at 9:48 PM
She got the title “Going Rogue” from one of them. I don’t remember which one as they’re all one and the same. Rush aptly calls them state-run stenographers.
Annie on November 14, 2009 at 10:08 PM
For someone who’s just a dumb, irrelevant, inexperienced, lying, religious-nut, crack-pot, small town, trailer trash, beauty queen, quitter diva, Mrs. Palin sure is getting a lot of attention from the left wingers. Hmmmm, I wonder why?
ncborn on November 14, 2009 at 9:53 PM
ncborn: You forgot to add,the witch doctor kubicki dance
at Sarahs Church,you know,the one that somebody
burnt down!!
canopfor on November 14, 2009 at 10:08 PM
Yawn. Same old stuff. How many times can the liberal pundits trot this junk out. I tire of it, but I guess their fear is unrelenting. She’s in their little, pointy heads. Ah fear, they tremble at the sound of her name!
donh525 on November 14, 2009 at 10:09 PM
“Stand now. Stand together. Stand for what is right.”
davidk on November 14, 2009 at 10:10 PM
He might potentially have a point if he didn’t, like many the left and far left, refuse to recognize thoughts, policies and positions contrary to his own as thoughts, policies, and positions at all.
I’m still wondering where he got the idea that she was a hardcore apocalyptic Christian. I’ve never seen the notion even discussed anywhere else. Have any of you?
CK MacLeod on November 14, 2009 at 10:10 PM
Yep, and Reagan was just a washed-up B actor.
29Victor on November 14, 2009 at 10:11 PM
Talk about elitism. To apply a gross sexual name to citizens fighting for their freedom. Why do we need to read anything by this fool.
Christian Conservative on November 14, 2009 at 10:11 PM
Are you on Soros’ payroll? You spend an awful lot of time on Palin threads with little to say. Kinda like the libs.
njpat on November 14, 2009 at 10:11 PM
Goodness, it’s astonishing that the experience card keeps getting played in light of the incompetent and arrogant boob running around the world embarrassing and endangering us at this very moment.
KittyLowrey on November 14, 2009 at 10:11 PM
I can`t wait to read Obamas memoirs,
titled,
Adventues of FU BO The Clown!!
canopfor on November 14, 2009 at 10:11 PM
I’m sick of seeing all these anti-Palin posts on Hot Air. Plus this site is popular so people see it here and then it spreads all over the place…
LurkerDood on November 14, 2009 at 10:11 PM
The Urban Dictionary.
billy on November 14, 2009 at 10:12 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 3 … 6 Next »