Radar: More Carrie Prejean videos?

posted at 9:33 pm on November 13, 2009 by Allahpundit

Such is the level of indignation on the right at the left’s nastiness towards her and those who might abet it that I got yelled at by a friend last night for posting this. Now Radar gives us something new, which isn’t the only claim out there that she’s made more than one “biggest mistake of my life.” I understand the defensiveness on her behalf — search the archives and you’ll see that I’ve written plenty in her favor — but I also get Ace’s exasperation:

My problem, instead, is that she has enlisted supporters, such as myself, to support her in her legal/PR campaign, on the theory that the California pageant had nothing legitimate to boot her out on, and that only anti-Christian animus could explain their behavior, when in fact… well, first the photos, which were racy, but I excused and defended. And then, well, the masturbation tape, which I kept quiet about.

And now… the other seven masturbation tapes…

She knew all this stuff was out there, she knew it was coming out, etc., and yet I and many of her supporters have been impressed into duty as her defenders through deception.

Because it wasn’t ever true that there was no reason, save anti-Christian animus, to kick her out of the pageant organization. A masturbation tape is, well. I’m not really offended by it but other pageant-hopefuls have gotten the boot for the same thing, and even a lot less.

So what do I feel about her? I feel she chumped me in order to advance her own legal interests…

Whether she has anything more interesting to say is up to her. But the Perez Hilton/pageant stuff? I really don’t care to hear how unfair it all was anymore. It was unfair, and a book deal was gotten out of that; that’s enough. A book deal can bandage up a lot of wounds.

I’m wondering if he’s in the minority on that or if sentiment is spreading that her defenders, in some way, have been had. I agree with him (and said so yesterday) that the left’s “hypocrisy” charge is overblown, for the simple reason that Christians don’t claim to be perfect. On the contrary, it’s the fact that they’re imperfect and prone to “stray from the path,” as we all are, that draws them towards redemption in the faith. There does, however, come a point where you stray so far from the path or so frequently that your commitment to it comes into question. For example, an atheist in a foxhole might be forgiven for saying a prayer in a moment of panic, while he’s being shot at. An atheist who prays any time he’s in a tough spot … simply ain’t much of an atheist. Has CP reached that point (yet) in Christian/conservative opinion or is her line of credit essentially limitless”?

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Bizarro No. 1 on November 14, 2009 at 6:46 PM

That’s how you take out the trash. Still, I cannot condone use of the word “retard” as a pejorative though it may seem apropos.

The Race Card on November 14, 2009 at 7:07 PM

That’s how you take out the trash.

if you haven’t figured it out, bizarro IS trash.

right4life on November 14, 2009 at 7:11 PM

If she did them to please the man in her life, I can’t see the problem other than being young and stupid enough to think the video wouldn’t get out. If you think she’s the first or the only, you haven’t seen what goes on around you.

Before I retired from law enforcement I spent most of my career on the streets and saw things young people did that would make your hair curl. And that was with the kids you would think wouldn’t do crazy or embarrassing things like that.

One time we had a case where two sisters, one fifteen and the other seventeen. Their dad was out of town for the night so they decided to have a party. They invited boys and lots of them. One of the “games” that was popular at the party was an oral daisy chain. The girls were seeing how many boys they could “pleasure” in a row by getting on their knees and having the boys form an assembly line (so to speak). Now these girls weren’t lowlifes, or pros, or whores, they just didn’t have the concept of what is proper or what is valuable to a person (you can thank our society, weak parents, and our educators for that one. Oh and by the way, this was just after Clinton was wearing that oral sex wasn’t really sex. Kids listen!)

Needless to say, when dad found out they took off. He came home when we called and found the all the boys had run, leaving their band equipment behind. He took out his frustration by smashing it all to pieces. Now that was funny.

Like I have said before, you had better take a good look around before you start throwing stones. Carrie was young, pretty and trying to please the love of her life. It happens, and frankly I know most men wouldn’t have a problem with it if their wife or girlfriend did the same thing, and if they do, they’re lying.

archer52 on November 14, 2009 at 7:12 PM

right4life on November 14, 2009 at 7:11 PM

I was responding to his statement. Whatever you may think of him is irrelevant to how I feel about the comment cited.

The Race Card on November 14, 2009 at 7:14 PM

If she did them to please the man in her life, I can’t see the problem other than being young and stupid enough to think the video wouldn’t get out. If you think she’s the first or the only, you haven’t seen what goes on around you.

I wonder if she fornicated. What’s the diff between fornicating and choosing the wrong partner according to God’s laws?

The Race Card on November 14, 2009 at 7:18 PM

Everything you’ve accused me is how I see you;

Bizarro No. 1 on November 14, 2009 at 6:46 PM

I haven’t accused you. Your own words expose you for the phony you are. That’s why I put together a compilation of your statements so they (your words, not mine) show people what you are saying, and you are contradicting the Bible, the words of Christ, and what it means to be a Christian.

It was people like you who thought Jesus was a blasphemer because He didn’t match their template of what the Messiah would look like.

Of course, what you are accusing me of is false. And I’d be real careful if I were you. You may not think deceitfulness is a serious sin, but the Bible warns that all liars will have their part in the lake of fire.

What you really should do though is STFU

STFU is short for ?? Your dirty mouth reveales your dirty heart.

apacalyps on November 14, 2009 at 7:33 PM

That’s how you take out the trash.

The Race Card on November 14, 2009 at 7:07 PM

Who are you refering to?

apacalyps on November 14, 2009 at 7:36 PM

Seven more videos?

I’m from Missouri, the…ah, never mind.

Sweet_Thang on November 14, 2009 at 8:03 PM

Who are you refering to?

apacalyps on November 14, 2009 at 7:36 PM

What’s on second.

The Race Card on November 14, 2009 at 8:10 PM

Revisionist history lesson – in a nutshell:

Beelzebub slithered

Nero fiddled

Michaelangelo doodled

Buffalo Bob dillied dallied

Larry Bird fiddled and diddled

ObaMao dithers, dawdles, oh yeah, and bows

Carrie Prejean diddles,

Sarah Palin went Rogue!

Sweet_Thang on November 14, 2009 at 8:11 PM

Once again, Matt 5:28 to 30 is taken out of context. These versus are speaking about marital fidelity, not masturbation.

This idea of taking the responsibilities of marriage as laid out in your scripture and then applying it to youth and teenagers is not supported by the text.

No one has shown anywhere that there’s a prohibition in the Bible against masturbation. Taking marital responsibility out of context isn’t appropriate, it’s deceptive, which is CERTAINLY a sin. . . isn’t it.

Honestly it’s pretty sad that you have to leave out 27, the actually commandment, to try to make your case.

Jason Coleman on November 14, 2009 at 8:15 PM

I also think that when these “videos” are exposed to actually be a few webcam captures at a low framerate people will be pretty disappointed.

Jason Coleman on November 14, 2009 at 8:17 PM

That’s how you take out the trash.

Thanks! Although, I guarantee the nutty, 6 y/o schitzophrenic will still talk at me because it isn’t capable of knowing any better.

Still, I cannot condone use of the word “retard” as a pejorative though it may seem apropos.

The Race Card on November 14, 2009 at 7:07 PM

I generally don’t feel like defending myself, but in this case I will because I detest politcal correctness.

I used “retard” in the #2 sense, not #1:

re·tard2 (rē’tärd’)
n. Offensive Slang
1.Used as a disparaging term for a mentally retarded person.
2.A person considered to be foolish or socially inept.

As you may notice, “retard” isn’t only a reference to people suffering from Mongolism, just as “gay” wasn’t always a reference to homosexuality, either.

Bizarro No. 1 on November 14, 2009 at 8:25 PM

if you haven’t figured it out, bizarro IS trash.

right4life on November 14, 2009 at 7:11 PM

LOL you back for more? Your mamma!

Bizarro No. 1 on November 14, 2009 at 8:28 PM

LOL you back for more?

Bizarro No. 1 on November 14, 2009 at 8:28 PM

yeah I enjoy making you look stupid..not that its very hard…

Your mamma!

is that the best you can do fat boy? my you are pretty limp and lame aren’t ya now? I can see why you’d be so obsessed with Carrie…no one like her would ever give you a second look…sonny boy.

right4life on November 14, 2009 at 8:32 PM

Bizarro No. 1 on November 14, 2009 at 8:25 PM

By your logic “fag” is unoffensive because Brits use the word to refer to cigarettes.

There is nothing political correct about being accurate. Your usage of “retard” was inaccurate, offensiveness notwithstanding. If accuracy matters to you, then your aversion to PC is moot in this case.

Though we disagree about your use of an obvious slur, I appreciate your reply.

The Race Card on November 14, 2009 at 8:37 PM

right4life on November 14, 2009 at 8:32 PM

Calling someone fat without posting your own pic pretty much IDs you as obese.

The Race Card on November 14, 2009 at 8:39 PM

Calling someone fat without posting your own pic pretty much IDs you as obese.

The Race Card on November 14, 2009 at 8:39 PM

yeah whatever…more liberal ‘logic’ mind your own business.

right4life on November 14, 2009 at 8:41 PM

posting your own pic

oh and uh why would you be interested in my pic, and where would you want me to post it?? hmmmm??

right4life on November 14, 2009 at 8:41 PM

where would you want me to post it?? hmmmm??

right4life on November 14, 2009 at 8:41 PM

Don’t go posting anything on my account. I already know what you look like, remember?

The Race Card on November 14, 2009 at 8:46 PM

I haven’t accused you. Your own words expose you for the phony you are. That’s why I put together a compilation of your statements so they (your words, not mine) show people what you are saying, and you are contradicting the Bible, the words of Christ, and what it means to be a Christian.

Of course, what you are accusing me of is false. And I’d be real careful if I were you. You may not think deceitfulness is a serious sin, but the Bible warns that all liars will have their part in the lake of fire.

STFU is short for ?? Your dirty mouth reveales your dirty heart.

apacalyps on November 14, 2009 at 7:33 PM

You are an excruciatingly stupid, unnaturally obnoxious, mentally ill twerp whose fatally flawed opinions I take about as seriously as I take Rosie O’Donnell’s. I feel like you’re dog poop deeply embedded in my shoe tread that desperately needs removal. Do you not hear me? I don’t care at all what you say to me! So, why do you persist in talking to me? Because you are an excruciatingly stupid, mentally ill twerp, that’s why.

If you don’t want to talk about CP, why don’t you run along like a good little turd, take your laughably juvenile religious opinions with you, and go play in the freeway or something.

Bizarro No. 1 on November 14, 2009 at 8:47 PM

I already know what you look like, remember?

The Race Card on November 14, 2009 at 8:46 PM

no you don’t. why would you? and what would I remember?

right4life on November 14, 2009 at 8:48 PM

right4life on November 14, 2009 at 8:48 PM

The Race Card on November 14, 2009 at 8:39 PM

Use the fork, Luke.

The Race Card on November 14, 2009 at 8:50 PM

Use the fork, Luke.

The Race Card on November 14, 2009 at 8:50 PM

oh yeah you’re just so brilliant…a legend in your own mind…

laughable. you have no idea. moron.

right4life on November 14, 2009 at 8:51 PM

yeah I enjoy making you look stupid..not that its very hard…

is that the best you can do fat boy? my you are pretty limp and lame aren’t ya now? I can see why you’d be so obsessed with Carrie…no one like her would ever give you a second look…sonny boy.

right4life on November 14, 2009 at 8:32 PM

You are so creative!

And w/e you say about me, I agree with you, now and in advance. Knock yourself silly.

Bizarro No. 1 on November 14, 2009 at 8:54 PM

Bizarro No. 1 on November 14, 2009 at 8:54 PM

I don’t have to say anything, just laugh at your idiotic drivel…still worshipping your racist hairygod darwin?

right4life on November 14, 2009 at 8:56 PM

laughable. you have no idea. moron.

right4life on November 14, 2009 at 8:51 PM

I don’t need an idea when you have given such a clear depciction of a man struggling with his own self-image.

The Race Card on November 14, 2009 at 9:00 PM

Well, gang, if we all think this is the last time we’ll been taken… Frankly, I never bought into her pure-as-the-driven-snow act. She’s a beautiful young woman with a small chest who got it “enhanced” so she could prance around a stage in as much state of undress as possible without being arrested. The Donald let her go for a reason and I think she should have shut up at that point and taken her lumps. That Paris Pretty brought up a question and she gave a supposedly sincere answer which displeased him does not give evidence that she was going to win that contest anyway. Ya can’t live like Hell and get to Heaven, as my gramma used to say.

Mae on November 14, 2009 at 9:02 PM

I don’t need an idea when you have given such a clear depciction of a man struggling with his own self-image.

The Race Card on November 14, 2009 at 9:00 PM

whatever oprah.

right4life on November 14, 2009 at 9:27 PM

No one has shown anywhere that there’s a prohibition in the Bible against masturbation. Taking marital responsibility out of context isn’t appropriate, it’s deceptive, which is CERTAINLY a sin. . . isn’t it.

Jason Coleman on November 14, 2009 at 8:15 PM

You are correct that the word “masturbation” does not occur in the Bible. But that doesn’t mean it is not considered a sin. In point of fact the New Testament word for fornication is actually a translation from the Latin word porneia, which encompasses many forms of sexual immorality. So, it’s not so cut and dried. I think Paul said it best in his letter to the Colossians: (Col. 3:1-6)

“But fornication and all impurity or covetousness must not even be named among you, as is fitting among saints…Be sure of this, that no fornicator or impure man, or one who is covetous (that is, an idolater), has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. Let no one deceive you with empty words, for it is because of these things that the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience…Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them. For it is a shame even to speak of the things that they do in secret; but when anything is exposed by the light it becomes visible, for anything that becomes visible is light.” (Eph. 5:3-13)

“If then you have been raised with Christ, seek the things that are above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God. Set your minds on things that are above, not on things that are on earth. For you have died, and your life is hid with Christ in God. When Christ who is our life appears, then you also will appear with him in glory. Put to death therefore what is earthly in you: fornication, impurity, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry. On account of these the wrath of God is coming.” (Col. 3:1-6)

Fed45 on November 14, 2009 at 10:56 PM

Who are you refering to?

apacalyps on November 14, 2009 at 7:36 PM

What’s on second.

The Race Card on November 14, 2009 at 8:10 PM

I see. OK.

apacalyps on November 14, 2009 at 11:49 PM

No one has shown anywhere that there’s a prohibition in the Bible against masturbation.

Jason Coleman on November 14, 2009 at 8:15 PM

If you truly believe that then you grossly misunderstand Scripture. What is your definition of masterbation anyways. I mean, are you refering to the physical act only? Sexual thoughts? Are both included in your definition? Would you please clarify so I can help you to see where you’re wrong. Thanks.

apacalyps on November 15, 2009 at 12:01 AM

You are an excruciatingly stupid, unnaturally obnoxious, mentally ill twerp whose fatally flawed opinions

Bizarro No. 1 on November 14, 2009 at 8:47 PM

Bottom line Bizarro — we live in an age where confusion about Biblical truth is rampant. And it’s phony Christians like yourself that add to that confusion. You’re just angry because I know the Bible well enough to determine if you’re telling the truth or not. One more thing, if you think that what I’m doing is foolish then you are proving that you are perishing in sin, on your way to hell (1 Corinthians 1:18). Give that some serious thought cause this isn’t no game. Are you serving the living God, or are you serving yourself?

apacalyps on November 15, 2009 at 1:06 AM

apacalyps on November 15, 2009 at 1:06 AM

You are just starved for attention, aren’t you, to the point that you’ll talk to a wall hoping it will respond back.

Why don’t you try again – maybe next time you’ll get what you want from me?!

Bizarro No. 1 on November 15, 2009 at 1:23 AM

By your logic “fag” is unoffensive because Brits use the word to refer to cigarettes.

No, that isn’t my logic. I do understand that people find certain terms like that offensive.

There is nothing political correct about being accurate. Your usage of “retard” was inaccurate, offensiveness notwithstanding. If accuracy matters to you, then your aversion to PC is moot in this case.

My logic is that you, the inferrer, don’t hold the all the cards in regards to what words you deem offensive should mean.

You may not like usage of “retard”, “oriental”, or “stupider”, but to say that they can only have the values/meanings you ascribe to them is a form of elitism and control that I don’t buy into.

Though we disagree about your use of an obvious slur

A slur according to you, yes, but not me, as I didn’t mean it the way you took it.

I appreciate your reply.

The Race Card on November 14, 2009 at 8:37 PM

You are welcome.

Bizarro No. 1 on November 15, 2009 at 1:29 AM

STOP TURNING JESUS INTO THE LAWYERMESSIAH.

ARGH.

Reaps on November 15, 2009 at 10:37 AM

‘Christian’ bimbos is the funniest kind of bimbos.

simplesimon on November 15, 2009 at 1:06 PM

simplesimon on November 15, 2009 at 1:06 PM

and they’re also the best-looking…conservative women are HOT…and liberal women are ugly as hell, on the inside and outside…bet they stink too!! just like you, loser.

right4life on November 15, 2009 at 1:51 PM

A slur according to you, yes, but not me, as I didn’t mean it the way you took it.

Fair enough, well-argued.

The Race Card on November 15, 2009 at 1:57 PM

There is no such thing as Atheist Hypocrisy, its an impossible concept

jp on November 15, 2009 at 3:50 PM

You are just starved for attention, aren’t you.. Why don’t you try again – maybe next time you’ll get what you want from me?!

Bizarro No. 1 on November 15, 2009 at 1:23 AM

Oh, yes, I’m starving for the attention of a liar with a filthy mouth. You can try drawing everybody’s attention away from the question Bizarro, but it still stands. Are you serving the living God, or are you serving yourself? Now, make sure you think about that long and hard even if you’re not going to answer it here. Thank you and may God bless you with truth.

apacalyps on November 15, 2009 at 5:46 PM

simplesimon on November 15, 2009 at 1:06 PM

Your mother is a laugh in Tijuana.

jdkchem on November 15, 2009 at 8:00 PM

Her ex “boyfriend” was interviewed by Armstrong and Getty Friday morning. She was introduced to him on the Internet through a friend. They met/stayed in a hotel for 4 days. And that was it. She kept sending him these videos and after they were sent she would call him and say, “What did you think about that?” That was it – kaput. This was the guy she “loved and cared a lot about” He said there were approx. 15 videos. Maybe he exaggerated but holy mackerel what a fall from grace

flameofjudah on November 15, 2009 at 9:06 PM

Fed 45 tries to use the translation of fornication from the Latin porneia to attempt to lump a variety of acts into the specific act which the Bible decries.

This is false on it’s face. Fornication is specifically defined in the surrounding context everywhere it’s mentioned and it’s not masturbation.

To try and say that the Latin is definitive and the true meaning of the scripture is failing to recognize that the Latin is a translation from Greek which is in itself a translation from other older language.It’s pretty obvious from context is what’s important here and not once in the bible is masturbation in any way shape or form mentioned.

There’s no discussion of the favorite passtime of pre- and post-pubescent boys in the absence of available females. There’s no discussion of manual stimulation of oneself as being sinful.

Sure, there are plenty of versus that people try to take out of context and expand to include it, but it’s simply not discussed anywhere.IF it is, the please, I’m sincerely asking, point out the verses.

But also understand that I am going to look at the context of those versus and won’t rely on on an expanded definition of one word that’s been translated three or four times over (like the examples already discussed above).I’m not trying to be a pill here. I’d really like to see it, because I’ve gone over it quite a few times and “masturbation is sin” or any variant thereof, simply isn’t there. I’d love to be shown to be wrong.

Onan’s dilemma isn’t it, and it has nothing to do with the adultery versus in Matthew.

Leviticus 15′s “seed of copulation” specifically states that at worst, it could merely render one unclean and unclean is not a sin, it’s just unclean until you can wash up.

Corinthians 5 talks about fornication, but there’s nothing there about being ALONE equating to fornication and hence a sin.If you want to say that masturbation is “unclean” according to the Bible, that’s fine, but a sin? It’s just not in there.

No blood sacrifices for wanking. Just a bath.

Jason Coleman on November 15, 2009 at 9:19 PM

I’ll withhold judgment until I have seen all the evidence.

After all, this is not something you would go off half cocked over.

Dave R. on November 15, 2009 at 9:47 PM

If you want to say that masturbation is “unclean” according to the Bible, that’s fine, but a sin? It’s just not in there.

Jason Coleman on November 15, 2009 at 9:19 PM

Jason, I fear you may love your sin so much, that you’re willing to give into this deception. Now, it makes no difference what you believe. It doesn’t change a thing. God’s Word is our final authority. Again, what is your definition of masterbation? Are you refering to the physical act? Sexual thoughts? Both? If we can establish this first, it will help me help you see you’re error. Please think about these things cause your eternal salvation could be at stake. Thanks.

apacalyps on November 15, 2009 at 11:15 PM

It doesn’t matter what my definition is, it matters what the Bible says.

Don’t worry about my eternal salvation and your right, it doesn’t matter what I believe.

I just want to know by what basis do supposed Christians make the claim that masturbation is a sin. Where is it in the Bible or is it just some addition by organized religion to instill fear in young girls and boys?

Where is it in the scriptures please?

Or should we toss out Cor. 4:6 which says “not to go beyond what is written”?

Jason Coleman on November 15, 2009 at 11:55 PM

Wow, I haven’t played this game in a while.

Revelation 21:8
But the cowards, unbelievers, vile, murderers, sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars—their share will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is the second death.

1 Timothy 1:10
for the sexually immoral and homosexuals, for kidnappers, liars, perjurers, and for whatever else is contrary to the sound teaching

Ephesians 5:5
For know and recognize this: no sexually immoral or impure or greedy person, who is an idolater, has an inheritance in the kingdom of the Messiah and of God.

1 Corinthians 6:9
Do you not know that the unjust will not inherit God’s kingdom? Do not be deceived: no sexually immoral people, idolaters, adulterers, male prostitutes, homosexuals

Hmmm. Guess it depends on what “sexual immorality” is. Or what the definition of “is” is.

Oh, and one might consider that even if the text in the Bible is divinely inspired, the text is, at best, a limited interpretation of the divine will as mortal language and understanding can not, even with divine guidance, communicate the direct message of an omnipotent being. But I’m sure your reading of the text translated from Hebrew to Aramaic to Greek to Latin to Old English to Modern English is the one true, divinely inspired word of God. Don’t let anyone tell you different.

Browncoatone on November 16, 2009 at 7:54 AM

I think it shows a profound lack of integrity on her part when she described diddling herself for her boyfriend’s gratification as “the biggest mistake of my life” and otherwise apologizing for it.

Who is she trying to brown nose with this mea culpa nonsense?

If that was the biggest mistake of her life, then she REALLY needs to get out more. She makes it sound like she never missed a stop sign or stubbed her toe because she wasn’t watching where she was going, both of which would qualify as bigger mistakes than this nonsense.

Her mistake in this case was not being sexual with her lover, but choosing her lover so poorly, a vulnerability that many women (and men) fall prey to and only overcome by learning the hard way.

I’m sick and tired of religious types pretending that their libido is a moral failing.

leereyno on November 16, 2009 at 8:31 AM

I have one question. I heard that she was 17 when she made these tapes. Wouldn’t the owner(s) of these videos and anybody that they give them to, to include the news media, be violating federal crimes in regards to child porn? Why isn’t the justice department going after these individuals who state that they have the videos?

PrettyD_Vicious on November 16, 2009 at 3:00 PM

It doesn’t matter what my definition is, it matters what the Bible says.

Jason Coleman on November 15, 2009 at 11:55 PM

That’s right.

I just want to know by what basis do supposed Christians make the claim that masturbation is a sin.

I’ve asked you twice now as clear as I know how and you keep avoiding answering the question. This is gonna be the third time. What is your definition of masterbation? Are you refering to the physical act? Sexual thoughts? Both?

Where is it in the scriptures please?

Yeah, we’ll get to that in a minute. We need to establish what you mean by masterbation first, then we can help you.

apacalyps on November 16, 2009 at 4:17 PM

I still think she is the finest looking woman I have ever seen. Smoking hot!

saiga on November 16, 2009 at 4:47 PM

I’m sorry, I honestly wasn’t trying to duck that question.

I think this definition suffices:

“stimulation especially of one’s own genital organs commonly resulting in orgasm and achieved by manual or other bodily contact exclusive of sexual intercours”

To the commenter who’s trying to use “sexually immoral” as a synonym for masturbation, I don’t think that especially flies. Especially in the case of children who usually discover the act long before they understand sex or morality.

If you find something in there that says masturbation is “sexually immoral” please let me know.

None of the versus quoted, especially when viewed in context, refer to masturbation. IF there is someplace in scripture which talks specifically about solitary manual stimulation, then please reference it.

Jason Coleman on November 16, 2009 at 5:01 PM

Let’s not forget that the ONLY REASON we’re talking about Carrie Prejean is because she said something the left didn’t like.

Yeah, she did some stupid, immoral stuff (from a Christian perspective) but none of that touches the primary point.

People went bonkers on her for holding an opinion.

That’s incredibly dangerous.

TheUnrepentantGeek on November 16, 2009 at 5:03 PM

but none of that touches the primary point.

People went bonkers on her for holding an opinion.

That’s incredibly dangerous.

TheUnrepentantGeek on November 16, 2009 at 5:03 PM

We’ll fit you in a brown coat yet.

Browncoatone on November 16, 2009 at 8:54 PM

I think this definition suffices: “stimulation especially of one’s own genital organs commonly resulting in orgasm and achieved by manual or other bodily contact exclusive of sexual intercourse”

Jason Coleman on November 16, 2009 at 5:01 PM

I think you’re being deceitful. You half-answered my question and ignored the rest. I asked three times if maturbation was a physical act, a sexual thought, or both? Read your answer. You said maturbation is a physical act, it’s “stimulation of one’s own genital organs.” Uh, what about stimulation of one’s own mind! You left that part out didn’t you. If you were honest you would admit that masturbation is nearly always the result of lustful thoughts, sexual stimulation, and/or pornographic images. That this sin sin starts with the mind! That’s why Jesus said, “Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.” If you have lusted, it is the same as adultery, according to Jesus. Jesus is talking about formulating sexual thoughts in your mind about a person. In the next verse, He says, “And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.” In otherwords, if your eye causes you to sin by looking at lustful things, it’d be better for you to be blind than to end up in hell with both your eyes. We should avoid compromising situations that lead us to sin against God. You shouldn’t allow your mind to wander into thinking or watching things that will cause you to do this – to masterbate.

To the commenter who’s trying to use “sexually immoral” as a synonym for masturbation, I don’t think that especially flies. Especially in the case of children who usually discover the act long before they understand sex or morality.

Don’t you dare use children discovering their bodies for the very first time (puberty) as evidence that masterbation is not sinful. There is something called the “age of accountabilty,” meaning God will not hold children accountable, not until they understand and are able to make a conscience decision to accept or reject the Lord Jesus as their Savior. God does not send babies and children to hell until they know right from wrong (Isaiah 7:14-16; Deuteronomy 1:39).

If you find something in there that says masturbation is “sexually immoral” please let me know.

Your arrogance is astounding. Scripture says, “whatsoever is not of faith is sin” (Romans 14:23). If an activity is not pleasing to God, then it is a sin.

IF there is someplace in scripture which talks specifically about solitary manual stimulation, then please reference it.

Here’s a good principle for testing whether a practice not specifically mentioned in Scripture is right or wrong. “Whether therefore ye eat, or drink, or whatsoever ye do, do all to the glory of God” (1 Corinthians 10:31). We should not be doing things that do no give glory to God.

apacalyps on November 16, 2009 at 8:55 PM

And that’s only the beginning. We haven’t even scratched the surface.

apacalyps on November 16, 2009 at 9:00 PM

How about you re-write your response without the ad hominem and without telling me what I may dare to talk about.

That would be the Christian thing to do. Wouldn’t it.

Jason Coleman on November 16, 2009 at 11:27 PM

How about you re-write your response without the ad hominem and without telling me what I may dare to talk about.

Jason Coleman on November 16, 2009 at 11:27 PM

You may meet somebody who doesn’t have many good Christian traits, but still is telling you the truth. You don’t decide truth based upon, “Is the speaker nice or mean?” That’s not how you decide it. Honestly, uh, I am angry at those who — especially when I debate phony Christians — when I realize they are making false statements (lying) about the Bible to destroy the faith of people coming through these types of forums.

That would be the Christian thing to do. Wouldn’t it.

Don’t lecture me. OK. The “Christian” thing to do is to believe what the Bible CLEARLY teaches YOU about sex, masturbation and sin — not IGNORE Scripture, after Scripture, after Scripture, with a holier than thou attitude. All you’ve done is mock the Christians in here (said with a whiny voice), “Show me. Show me. By what basis do supposed Christians make the claim that masturbation is a sin?” Well, I have a question for you, Jason! How many times can somebody show you that you’re wrong without you acknowledging it. Hmm? That’s my question to YOU. Because I answered your question. I showed you we should not be doing things that do no give glory to God (1 Corinthians 10:31). Now, in response to that did you say, “Oh, thanks apacalyps. I didn’t see that Scripture. Thanks for bringing that to my attention.” No, no, no… you attack me and say, “You’re a mean Christian. You’re willy willy mean, apacalyps.” It’s me. I’m the problem. You’re wrong, and it’s my fault. Wow! With logic like that who could argue?! lol

Now listen, Jason. OK. Because I wanna help. OK. I really do. That’s my heart. And I wouldn’t lie to you. If you truly want to be delivered from a sin then start believe what God is telling you. OK. The Bible instructs us to flee youthful lusts and resist the devil (2 Timothy 2:22; James 4:7). Resist him (fight the Devil), so he can’t overpower your mind. Ephesians 5:3 declares, “fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you.” This is telling you to avoid any kind of sexual immorality, or of any kind of impurity. All sex outside of marriage, whether it is adultery, sexual promiscuity, masturbation, fornication, even lust, which Jesus said is “adultery of the heart” (Matthew 5:28) is sinful in God’s sight.

If you take anything away from this, let it be this: Lust does not originate in our flesh. OK. Evil desires originate in our hearts. God created us with a natural attraction to someone of the opposite sex, but we cross the line. We use pornography of the mind. That’s undressing somebody in our thoughts and imaginations. Look how the Bible describes what happens when desire is getting a grip on you. James 1:13-15 says, “Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.”

Masturbation is a hard sin to give up. So don’t be too hard on yourself if your first efforts meet with some failures. Some sin can take years to overcome so have patience. The key is to believe God’s Word and trust Him to help you. If you do that He will help you overcome any sin in your life. Thank you.

apacalyps on November 17, 2009 at 1:27 AM

Oh, yes, I’m starving for the attention of a liar with a filthy mouth.

Yes, denier-of-the-obvious, you are starving for my attention, you lying, dirty-mouthed phony Christian!

You can try drawing everybody’s attention away from the question Bizarro, but it still stands. Are you serving the living God, or are you serving yourself? Now, make sure you think about that long and hard even if you’re not going to answer it here. Thank you and may God bless you with truth.

apacalyps on November 15, 2009 at 5:46 PM

May God bless you with the truth too. Unfortunately, in your case, that won’t be in the near future, at least not until not only has Hell frozen over, but frozen to it’s very bottom!

Bizarro No. 1 on November 17, 2009 at 2:19 AM

May God bless you with the truth too. Unfortunately, in your case, that won’t be in the near future, at least not until not only has Hell frozen over, but frozen to it’s very bottom!

Bizarro No. 1 on November 17, 2009 at 2:19 AM

Stop serving the Devil.

apacalyps on November 17, 2009 at 2:26 AM

Her ex “boyfriend” was interviewed by Armstrong and Getty Friday morning. She was introduced to him on the Internet through a friend. They met/stayed in a hotel for 4 days. And that was it. She kept sending him these videos and after they were sent she would call him and say, “What did you think about that?” That was it – kaput. This was the guy she “loved and cared a lot about” He said there were approx. 15 videos. Maybe he exaggerated but holy mackerel what a fall from grace

flameofjudah on November 15, 2009 at 9:06 PM

She is abnormally out of touch with reality, more than can be chalked up to mere denial. I’d be willing to bet a lot of moolah that she was sexually abused as a kid, and has no conscious inkling that she was.

She clearly needs some psychological help, not attacks.

Bizarro No. 1 on November 17, 2009 at 2:29 AM

How about you re-write your response without the ad hominem and without telling me what I may dare to talk about.

That would be the Christian thing to do. Wouldn’t it.

Jason Coleman on November 16, 2009 at 11:27 PM

God’s Most Esteemed Servant, apacalyps, understands what “the Christian thing to do” is about as much as Mohammed did i.e. zip; zero; nada!

Trying to talk to apacalyps as an adult about religious matters is about as fruitful as trying to talk to the banjo-playing guy from Deliverance about quantum physics.

apacalyps=schitzophrenic, unapologetically abusive, 6 y/o nutcase.

Bizarro No. 1 on November 17, 2009 at 2:41 AM

Stop serving the Devil.

apacalyps on November 17, 2009 at 2:26 AM

Right back at you, you dirty-mouthed, phony Christian!!!

Bizarro No. 1 on November 17, 2009 at 2:42 AM

Bizarro No. 1 on November 17, 2009 at 2:42 AM

Do you wave your unread Bible with one hand or two?

apacalyps on November 17, 2009 at 3:25 AM

Apacalyps,

You are beclowning yourself.

First, I’m not some phony Christian. I’m an atheist. I said so in my original comment.

As for phony Christians, the only phony Christian I see is those like you who are trying to use the Bible as a bludgeon for their own purposes, not Christian ones.

You say “Don’t lecture me” when you tell me not to ‘dare’ speak of this or that. You make me laugh. I’m not ignoring scripture either, I’m trying to get to the root truth of scripture to understand how Christianity has evolved and diverged from it’s original path.

You haven’t “shown” me anything, you’ve taken verses unrelated to the subject out of context and cherry-picked phrases to expand upon without basis.

The definition I have given you is a simple one. The FACT is that no where in the bible does it speak in any way shape or form to the definition of masturbation I’ve given you. YOU CHOSE to expand that definition into ‘lust’ and ‘adultery’ and that’s a fools game which I won’t play.

To are taking snippets of scripture and expanding them into all encompassing orders from on high which scripture in context explicitly forbids you from doing, but to take the scripture at it’s word is to deny yourself the hammer you wish.

My questions were simple and honest, you chose to make them into something else and launch a series of ad hominems instead of addressing the point. In my opinion, that’s par for the course for those who want to wear their Christianity on their sleeve as you are want to do.

Finally, let me also state what a intellectually dishonest person you are. Not only do you take your god-constructs words and alter his quotes, you do it with everyone you seem to encounter. That makes you a LIAR, plain and simple. Beyond the laughable nature of the false quotes you attribute to me, you sadden me and insult all Christians when you twist and falsify quotes from your own god-construct.

These questions I’m asking have nothing to do with a desire for me to “give up” masturbation” I’m trying to see how some supposed Christians are justifying themselves for calling something a sin which is not defined as such by their Bible.

At best, masturbation is merely “unclean”. It is not a sin worthy of blood sacrifice, it’s not even worthy of animal sacrifice. The Bible’s only instruction on it is that it’s possibly unclean, and unclean is not a sin.

Matt. 5.28 is not about masturbation, it’s not even about adultery in the modern sense, and you’d realize that if you read it in context. Matt. 5.27 makes this clear.

James 1 13-15 likewise is not about masturbation, it’s about temptation, which masturbation is not, it can be, but it’s not in a of itself. Unless of course you define masturbation with lust, which again, it is not, it can be, but it is not in and of itself.

Likewise Timothy and James 4 do not refer to masturbation, period.

As for 1 Cor. 10:31, it’s pretty clear what’s meant there, and it’s not what you think just like scratching one’s head because you have an itch isn’t covered by the verse, Colossians 3:17 and Peter 4:11 show that the Corinthians verse is about actions mainly with others and the exultation of the Lord, not the mundane physical tasks of daily life. Again, no references to masturbation whatsoever.

Finally, let me laugh at you once more for the utter betrayal of Christian values you’ve demonstrated here. Let me point out again your intellectual dishonest for altering the words and nature of quotes you attribute to me, and let me tell you a hearty “F*ck you” for trying to tell me what I “dare” not talk about. Especially when you and your ilk are the one who “dare” to tell children things are sins which clearly are NOT defined as such by your god-construct and your scripture.

If it is clearly defined, then show me. Because the Bible instructs “not to go beyond what is written” and you so clearly do, I find you largely irrelevant. So perhaps you want to NOW back away from you ad hominem and address the issue honestly, but I doubt you want to do either.

Masturbation is not lust. Masturbation is not fornication, and it’s not adultery. I can be two of these three things, but it in and of itself is simply not. Only in your expanded and delusional fantasy is masturbation a sin worth of blood sacrifice and a trip to hell and quite frankly, I think you’re a sick puppy for trying to take it there.

So again, I ask, if someone can point to a verse, that defines masturbation (not lust, not adultery, not underwater basket weaving) as a SIN (not unclean, not something to avoid, but a big *ss SIN), I would be very happy if you pointed it out.

Especially since it’s obvious I’ve read my Bibles quite a few times more than Apacalyps has read his.

Jason Coleman on November 17, 2009 at 6:00 AM

Masturbation is not lust. Masturbation is not fornication, and it’s not adultery.

Jason Coleman on November 17, 2009 at 6:00 AM

I’m convinced that after studying the Bible all these years that people choose deliberately to believe lies which is totally devoid of evidence for all sorts of reasons. I’m showing this guy Scripture which clearly says masturbation is a sin that he ought to respect, and hey, it doesn’t work! Point is, some simply don’t want God telling them what to do. Now, you do whatever you want Jason, but Judgment day we’re gonna find out who’s right and who’s wrong. I am convinced the Scriptural evidence points to masturbation being a sin. Our bodies are meant to be temples for the indwelling Holy Spirit (that is, of God Himself) and it is insulting to Him if we misuse those bodies in fornication or any incleannes (see 1 Corinthians 6:19-20). The same Bible teaches that everyone will face the Creator one day to be judged for everything they have said, done, or thought. I recommend that you prepare for that day.

apacalyps on November 17, 2009 at 2:58 PM

See, the problem is you have NOT shown where the Bible “clearly says masturbation is a sin”. You simply have not.

Even 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 does not say that. It says what you should do, but it DOES NOT say that masturbation is a sin. It doesn’t say that if you don’t treat your body like a temple that that is a “sin”.

There is a HUGE difference between what is considered unclean, and what is a sin. A gulf separates the two.

You are choosing to equate things that are unclean with “sin” and through the “not beyond what is written” you are committing more of an infraction against your god-construct that the act of masturbation does. Which again, is not mentioned anywhere in the Bible.

You keep trying to include things with are specifically excluded from “sin”. The Bible states that masturbation is unclean, THAT IS IT, and even that is a bit of a stretch because it only holds that it’s unclean IN THE PRESENCE OF YOUR WIFE OR A WOMAN.

Find me the passage where it states that masturbation is a sin and I will GLADLY agree with you, because even though I am an atheist, I’m a fan of the Hebrew and Christian faiths. It pains me to see people diminish the value of what is called “sin” and elevate the minor infractions by blowing them out of proportions when those proportions are specifically laid out.

Masturbation is unclean. Granted, and I’ll point out that I’m the one who posted that passage. You have not delivered on anything that equates masturbation with sin.

Sins are the capital crimes of Christianity and Judaism.
Masturbation is a class C misdemeanor.

Going beyond what is written. . . now THAT is a sin.

Teaching children (or anyone) that X is a sin when it’s not, that is unconscionable; in fact, in the Hebrew and Aramaic languages, it’s satanic.

I respect the word of the god-construct of the Bible because I respect Christianity, what I don’t respect is someone extrapolating beyond what is there in scripture and calling it truth. That’s what you have done and are continuing to try to do when you equate unclean acts with sin.

Jason Coleman on November 17, 2009 at 7:12 PM

Find me the passage where it states that masturbation is a sin and I will GLADLY agree with you,

Jason Coleman on November 17, 2009 at 7:12 PM

I’m sorry, but the answers that you give to the Scripture I posted and the criticisms that you give is absolutely silly and I do not feel it is even worth an answer. I think that anyone who reads your answers or reads your comments with an open-mind would agree. Thank you.

apacalyps on November 17, 2009 at 9:02 PM

Well, that’s too bad. Especially since you’ve never tried to actually address my points nor defend yours. Each verse I challenge you conveniently have dropped to substitute another with equally poor results for your position.

It’s too bad you think so many things which aren’t are sins. Should you be right about the afterlife, you’ve got some serious ‘splaining to do.

Remember, Satan in Hebrew and Aramaic means “the accuser” and if you look back on you’re posts, you’ve sure done alot of that.

Have a fantastic day.

Jason Coleman on November 17, 2009 at 11:10 PM

Well, that’s too bad. Especially since you’ve never tried to actually address my points nor defend yours.

Jason Coleman on November 17, 2009 at 11:10 PM

I told you. It doesn’t matter how many times I show you using the Bible that masturbation is a sin, you won’t accept it. And the reason is because you have a reprobate mind. Reprobate is not calling somebody a name. It is a name of a curse that falls upon people who continually reject God, and would rather believe a lie over truth (See Romans 1:28 and 2 Thessalonians 2:11). You have been deluded, OK. You have believed strong delusion. The Bible warned us this would happen. It says, “there should be mockers (like Jason) in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts” (Jude 1:16-25). People who claim that masturbation is not lust. Masturbation is not fornication, and it’s not adultery. People like you.

Remember, Satan in Hebrew and Aramaic means “the accuser” and if you look back on you’re posts, you’ve sure done alot of that.

You are the one calling God a liar by claiming He doesn’t really mean what He says. Satan used the same tactic on Eve in Genesis 3:1. He got her to doubt the words that God had said. Oh well, you just do what you want, but we’ll see Judgment day what happens. Thank you.

apacalyps on November 18, 2009 at 1:09 AM

You are the one calling God a liar by claiming He doesn’t really mean what He says.

Wow! That’s rich. My entire point is that some Christians (like you) are going beyond the word of their own scripture to go beyond what the specific scriptural versus say.

Lust and masturbation are two completely different things. That’s definitional by ANY standard, and it’s specifically stated in the Bible. The Bible states rather unequivocally that Lust is indeed a sin. The Bible also states rather unequivocally that masturbation is “unclean”.

Unclean and Sin are two different things.

YOU SIR, are breaking a direct commandment of your lord who commands that you “not go beyond what is written”.

I have shown you the verse which states that masturbation is “unclean”. You have not shown where the Bible states that masturbation is a “sin”.

Are you attempting to say that “unclean” equates to “sin” in the eyes of your lord?

The above is a pretty simple at straightforward question, a simple yes/no will do but if you’d like to elaborate as to how “unclean” equals “sin” I’d sincerely like to hear it.

I find it interesting that I’m protecting the integrity of your scriptures and I’m the atheist. You’re certainly putting alot of scripture into your lord’s mouth which you have no basis for. If he didn’t say it, I’d be careful about saying he did if I were you.

“Go not beyond what is written.” Have any thoughts on that? Any at all?

Jason Coleman on November 18, 2009 at 1:48 AM

Man, I can’t believe I’m wasting my time with you. You are such a snake. You wanna do this? OK. Let’s do it.

Lust and masturbation are two completely different things.

Jason Coleman on November 18, 2009 at 1:48 AM

Wrong. Lust and masturbation go hand-in-hand with one another. As I said, you are being very dishonest when you won’t admit that masturbation is almost always the result of lustful thoughts, sexual stimulation, and/or pornographic images. You wanna dissassociate the two and claim that lust has nothing at all to do with sexual pleasure (ie, manual stimulation of the genital organs). Well, that’s not reality. OK. Tell me who masturbates without first formulating a sexual thought in their mind? I want an answer to that.

Second, before we go any further let’s define some terms first. I’ve debated atheists like you before and your kind use Christian terminology but completely redefine everything. How are you defining the word “lust?”

Third, the Bible says that we can either live in the spirit or in the flesh. But, that it is impossible to do both — it does not work. Galatians 5:17 says, “For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would.” Explain what this verse means?

There’s more, but that’s it for now. This should get things started.

apacalyps on November 18, 2009 at 3:47 AM

Do you see what you are writing, it’s nonsensical.

You sure do demand alot of answers to questions but seem to constantly refuse to answer them.

Let’s continue.

“Lust and masturbation go hand-in-hand with one another.” This statement does NOTHING to prove your point. In fact it proves mine.

If they go “hand in hand” you are flat out admitting they are NOT the same thing. Sure they may be close, they may be coincident but they are not the same thing. The Bible makes this distinction quite clearly as I have shown through verse. Masturbation is unclean, lust is sin. Masturbation is not lust just like unclean is not sin.

“Tell me who masturbates without first formulating a sexual thought in their mind? I want an answer to that. ” That’s pretty simple. Millions of men daily who wake up with morning wood would fit this criteria. Millions of people daily who wake up with a hangover may also fit this bill as it’s one of the easiest ways to release endorphins and knock down a hangover.

How am I defining LUST. I AM NOT. I’m merely looking at scripture. I am using the scripture to define terms here. I’m not like some of you Christians who read whatever you want to see into the scripture.

So now you’re going to throw Galatians into this. Do you realize that you just keep throwing verses at the wall to see if you can get one to stick. When one doesn’t stick you throw another completely irrelevant one.

I’ve answered your demands for specific answers to specific question, but you’ve repeatedly refused to answer mine.

You equate masturbation and lust. The Bible does not. That is a set of simple logical statements backed up by the scripture. Masturbation is unclean, Lust is sin.

Are you trying to equate “unclean” and “sin”, if you are, you are doing EXACTLY what your god-construct specifically instructs you to do.

Before you whine about a definition of lust, this one works fine for me:

lust -verb- To have an intense or obsessive desire, especially one that is sexual.

lust -noun- An overwhelming desire or craving

Neither of those are required for masturbation. The Bible recognizes this. The Bible is even very specific to show that masturbation is one thing (“unclean”) and lust is another (“sin”).

My atheism doesn’t make any difference here because this is not a discussion of faith, it’s a simple discussion of the scripture in and of itself. I choose to take it for it’s word and adhere to the admonition to “go not beyond what is written” while you chose to make up definitions and meaning however it suits you and your own proclivities and prejudices.

How bout you be a good Christian now and stop with the ad hominem attacks and strawmen and misdirection. Answer some of my questions directly as I’ve answered yours directly.

Are you attempting to say that “unclean” equates to “sin” in the eyes of your lord?

Why do you insist on changing the specific instructions with ever expanding interpretations when the Bible specifically instructs you to “go not beyond what is written?”

Lust and masturbation are two different things, your Bible says so directly, why do you deign to re-interpret that which instructs you not to?

Keep talking about lust all you want, just know, that according to the Bible, it’s orders of magnitude different from masturbation.

Again if you can find something that says that masturbation is a sin, please do. Lust is not masturbation, simple as that according to your lord and his scripture.

I’ll also offer you some advice. You keep throwing scripture against the wall, try sticking with one verse that you think might do what you want and defend that, when you keep changing your tunes to try and find something that works, it only shows that you don’t really understand the points you are trying to argue, and you’re merely working from a list. It’s much easier and HONEST to work from one or two postulates and find the truth in those rather than trying to obfuscate and jump around in the hopes of tiring me out.

The Bible says they are different. Refute that if you would. Unless of course “unclean” and “sin” are the same to you, despite their differences to your lord.

Jason Coleman on November 18, 2009 at 12:12 PM

This para came out poor when I revised it.

“Are you trying to equate “unclean” and “sin”, if you are, you are doing EXACTLY what your god-construct specifically instructs you to do.”

Should read-

Are you trying to equate “unclean” and “sin”? If you are, you are doing EXACTLY what your god-construct specifically instructs you NOT to do. “Go not beyond what is written.”

Jason Coleman on November 18, 2009 at 3:01 PM

If they go “hand in hand” you are flat out admitting they are NOT the same thing.

Jason Coleman on November 18, 2009 at 12:12 PM

You said that, “Lust and masturbation are two completely different things.” You wanna separate them like they have nothing to do with each another. I am saying that is that’s simply flawed logic, OK. That is certainly not what the Bible teaches. Masturbation is always associated with lust (except when it comes to children who don’t know right from wrong yet). Example: Have you ever hated somebody? Well, you’ve commited murder in your heart. The Bible says whoever hates his brother is a murderer (1 John 3:15). We can violate God’s Law by attitude and intent. Murder is hate bearing its fruit. The same principle applies to masturbation. Masturbation is lust bearing it’s fruit. Masturbating is the fruit of lust. In the same way, “the fruit of the Spirit is love” (Galatians 5:22). So to say that lust has nothing to do with masturbationg is ludicrous. Now if you wanna believe that, that’s perfectly fine. I don’t care what you believe OK, but that’s not what the Bible says.

“Tell me who masturbates without first formulating a sexual thought in their mind?” That’s pretty simple. Millions of men daily who wake up with morning wood would fit this criteria. Millions of people daily who wake up with a hangover may also fit this bill as it’s one of the easiest ways to release endorphins and knock down a hangover.

You have got to be kidding me. I guarantee you they are not masterbating with an empty mind. You know where their thoughts are? Lusting — after somebody. They have images in their mind, typically. Listen, you’re commiting adultery. You’re commiting fornication if you’re doing it in thought. I mean, that’s probably enough said right there. But, let’s pursue this further.

The Bible is even very specific to show that masturbation is one thing (”unclean”) and lust is another (”sin”). Are you attempting to say that “unclean” equates to “sin” in the eyes of your lord?

Even if masturbation was only unclean it is STILL A SIN. if you read Galatians and what the apostle Paul says about this, he lists 17 typical sins of the “flesh” (the body). The list is not exhaustive but it included sexual sins, religious sins, moral sins, violent sins, mental sins — everything which violates the laws of God and man.

“Now the works of the flesh (body) are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.” Galatians 5:19-21

apacalyps on November 18, 2009 at 8:28 PM

Wow, you’re really something to see. This is quite interesting. So let’s begin.

You wanna separate them like they have nothing to do with each another.

I say that they are two completely different things, they are, the Bible treats them as such, labeling one as unclean and one as sin. I haven’t given very many of my opinions on the subject, because my views aren’t the issue I’m examining. MY point is that the Bible tells Christians to “go not beyond what is written” and then also specifically (and the ONLY time masturbation is mentioned) tells Christians what masturbation is (“unclean” and hence NOT a sin in and of itself).

“Masturbating is the fruit of lust.

Ha, ha, again, you prove my point. Masturbation is not lust. That’s according to your own words. Just like a lemon is not a lemon tree. Thanks again for making my point.

So to say that lust has nothing to do with masturbationg is ludicrous.

Actually, by your own words, AND according to scripture, it’s not ludicrous, but you have no problem insulting and re-interpreting scripture, so I guess that’s to be expected.

I’ll get to the fatal flaw in your statement in a second.

You have got to be kidding me. I guarantee you they are not masterbating with an empty mind. You know where their thoughts are? Lusting — after somebody.

I wanted to include this with your fatal flaw because it just makes it so much easier. To borrow a logical proof from someone else. Let’s talk about your absolutes here and why they make you simply wrong.

For you to be right. That all masturbation is lust, begins with lust and only takes place with lust, you have to be right every time, each and every time, with NO EXCEPTIONS.

I only have to be right once. Simple as that. Just once in recorded history if someone wanks for a reason other than lust, I win. Guess what, I win, because it’s pretty easy to show that masturbation DOES NOT HAVE TO INCLUDE lust. I’ll admit that MANY times it can and has been co-incident, but the ludicrous part is your absolute that lust is always the primary component of masturbation, and that’s simply not true. Therefore, you have failed because simple logic has betrayed you. You also fail because of the specific instructions of scripture, but you fail for many reasons in this debate I’m afraid.

“Even if masturbation was only unclean it is STILL A SIN.”

WOW! That’s straight up blasphemy, you know that right?

The Bible is VERY VERY VERY clear that unclean acts are NOT sins and do not require a blood sacrifice, not even an animal sacrifice. Unclean acts are TWO orders of magnitude below sin.

YOU have definitely taken scripture to your own new personal level. I can’t believe you would contradict the word of your God so directly. It just proves that you’re working off someone else’s notes and don’t really understand what you’re saying. So who’s notes are you using, is this some new Evangelical standard that I’m unfamiliar with? It’s DEFINITELY not Catholic dogma and it’s certainly WAY beyond what Martin Luther and the protestants put together.

What sect are you representing brother?

As for Galatians 5. You know the word SIN does not appear anywhere in it right?

Of course you still haven’t opined on “go not beyond what is written”. Why is that I wonder? Judging by what you’ve written in the last post, I think we can see why.

Jason Coleman on November 19, 2009 at 1:07 AM

apacalyps on November 17, 2009 at 2:26 AM

SaintOlaf, is that you?

Reaps on November 19, 2009 at 7:05 AM

Masturbating is the fruit of lust.

apacalyps on November 18, 2009 at 8:28 PM

Ha, ha, again, you prove my point. Masturbation is not lust.

You are confused. I said masturbating is the fruit of lust. This is an expression meaning the urge for masturbation comes from lust which makes it a sin. Here’s an example of this where Paul describes the sexual perversion of men and women who gave their bodies over to vile effections (homosexuality). It’s sad. They didn’t want to know God, so He gave them over to their lusts:

“Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:” Romans 1:24-27

You cannot masturbate without lusting after somebody in your heart because you have to lust after someody to get aroused. That example you provided when I asked “Who masturbates with an empty mind?” And you said people who woke up with a hangover and an erection and masturbated to release endorphins to knock down their hangover — that’s intellectual dishonesty and a waste of my time.

Here’s the thing: What is the only sexual outlet sexually in all the Bible that’s undefiled? Answer: The Marriage Bed. If you read 1 Corinthians 7 when Paul is answering some questions that the Corinthians posed to him concerning sex, concerning whether it is good, whether it’s bad. Paul doesn’t says if you’re burning with sexual desires, “Well, it’s okay to masterbate sometimes — infrequently.” No. He only gives one way out, “then let a man take a wife.” That’s basically it. If they cannot exercise self-control they should marry:

“If they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn” (1 Corinthians 7:9 ).

Listen, there’s only one way out. There is only one way that is pure. There is only one way that is right. There is only one way that God advocates. There is only one way. That’s in marriage. That’s it. That is it. There’s none other. Listen to this, 1 Thessalonians 4:3-5:

“For this is the will of God (what’s the will of God?), even your sanctification (your holiness), that ye should abstain from fornication (that is, any sexual relationship outside of heterosexual marriage): That every one of you should know how to possess his vessel (sexual organ) in sanctification and honour; Not in the lust of concupiscence (not in the passion of lust), even as the Gentiles which know not God:”

We are told that each one of you know how to control his own body. You see, Jason. You know what masterbation is? It’s a lack of self control. That’s what it is. And we’re being told SELF CONTROL. Each one of you needs to control his own body in holiness and honour. In ending, wanting to have sex is natural, but seeking to fufill that desire without being married is a sin.

apacalyps on November 19, 2009 at 7:52 PM

“I said masturbating is the fruit of lust.” Yes, you did, and you proved my point, that one is not the other. I’ve always said that it CAN involve lust, but it is not mandatory for it to do so. It’s simply not.

“You cannot masturbate without lusting after somebody in your heart because you have to lust after someody to get aroused.”

Simply not true, you don’t have to lust after someone to masturbate. It’s absurd to say that in order to masturbate, YOU MUST lust after some specific person. That’s simply not true.

Romans 1:24-27 Here you go again, it’s not saying what you think it’s saying, it’s MAY be interpreted that IF you give over to lust, etc. etc. But it does NOT say that Masturbation is sin.

Back to Galatians, you never responded to the fact that the word SIN is nowhere in Galatians 5. Yet you contintue to go where you’re explicitly told not to by scripture.

And you said people who woke up with a hangover and an erection and masturbated to release endorphins to knock down their hangover — that’s intellectual dishonesty and a waste of my time.

Intellectually dishonesty? PROVE IT, I dare you. Not to mention that you significantly altered the quote. You are a LIAR, plain and simple. Now go back and read what I actually wrote and not what you twisted it into and TRY AND PROVE ME WRONG! Knocking down morning wood is VERY well documented and has nothing to do with lusts and arousal via sexual thoughts. The erection is a response by your unconscious to prevent you from pissing all over yourself in your sleep.

As for people knocking down their hangover through endorphin release, that’s also well documented.

Remember, I only need ONE example of someone doing either to prove your whole premise completely wrong. So . . . you’ve been proven wrong. . . AGAIN.

1st Corinthians doesn’t help you either because your versus don’t refer to masturbation. YOU ARE ASSUMING THAT, and there is not any basis for it in the scripture. You don’t get to just make up what it says, although that doesn’t seem to stop you very much, you seem to just make it up as you go along. There’s nothing in 1st Cor. doesn’t say anything about masturbation, it does say don’t go out and have sex with some random woman, but it DOES NOT say anything about masturbation. To say it does is to LIE.

You seem to twist scripture as much as you twist other people’s quotes.

fornication (that is, any sexual relationship outside of heterosexual marriage)

— There is NO RELATIONSHIP in masturbation, that’s the whole point of it. No relationship needed. Fornication is actually the polar OPPOSITE of masturbation.

You know what masterbation is? It’s a lack of self control.

Actually again you’re just making stuff up. By it’s very definition, masturbation is only self controlled. FIND ME THE PASSAGE where it says masturbation is a lack of self control.

IF ANYTHING, the Bible (my source here, I don’t know what your source is) says that masturbation IS controlling where and when your seed winds up. That’s the whole point of Onan that he resisted his urge through self control to NOT impregnate his brother’s wife.

You are seriously flawed in your argumentation here bub.

Now I asked nice, and especially after you chastised me so about not directly answering your buried question, I’ll put it here in bold and it and see if you avoid it again.

Why do you insist in disobeying the Bible which states quite clearly to “not go beyond what is written”?

and

Are you trying to equate “unclean” with “sin” despite their clear separation in scripture?

In other words, why do you keep making things up and saying that they are “in the Bible”?

PS Vessel, in Hebrew and the Aramaics does not mean what you think it does. Neither does fornication and neither does adultery.

Jason Coleman on November 19, 2009 at 8:39 PM

IF ANYTHING, the Bible (my source here, I don’t know what your source is) says that masturbation IS controlling where and when your seed winds up.

Look at this poor deceived man. You know this man Jason right here. Let me do a little commercial. This man right here is so eaten’ up with torment, with shame, with uselessness in life, with no purpose, that he has got to — see, if he didn’t think — if he wasn’t being convicted right now of sin he would never have entered into this debate about masturbation, but it’s eating him up. Y’know why? Because sin NEVER satisfies. It NEVER satisfies! And you know what a sinner does when confronted with his sin? He justifies his sin. He makes excuse for his sin. That’s what this man Jason is doing. He doesn’t like the truth because he’s of his father the devil, the father of lies. So he loves lying. He loves darkness. And therefore when confronted with sin he makes excuse, he justifies, or he ridicules or belittles. That’s what sinners do. Anyways, I’ve tried to help, Jason. The most loving thing I can do for you as a Christian is to tell you the truth. Is to warn you of the judgment to come. But, after reading your delusional answers about lust and masturbation and watching you lie about mine, I am convinced you don’t really want an answer, you just want to tie up all my time and prevent the Gospel from getting out. The answers that you give are absolutely so silly and I don’t feel they are even worth answering. This has become a waste of my time. There are so many people who want to hear the truths about the Bible and creation and my time is better spent with them. Good bye.

apacalyps on November 19, 2009 at 11:36 PM

You just couldn’t face up to “go not beyond what is written” could you?

I find it hilarious you want to sermonize about/to me.

The Bible states masturbation is unclean.
The Bible states that unclean and sin are different.
The Bible says to “go not beyond what is written.”

You state masturbation is sin.
You state that unclean and sin are the same.
You go beyond what is written.

This atheist is a better Christian than the Christian who calls himself apacalyps.

Perversions of the scripture like you are doing apacalyps are exactly the same as the perversions that led to Martin Luther nailing the theses to the door. Twisting scripture the way you do is what drives so many young people away from Christianity. When their elders and teachers tell them that something is X and the Bible says it’s Y, they see the hypocrisy. They see that you twist the word of your god-construct to mean whatever you want it to mean, and they see through your attempts to tell them that up is down, white is black and freedom is slavery.

You are a disgrace to all those real Christians out there apacalyps.

I’ll also let you know that you could have easily said “Well, you’re right, the word masturbation isn’t in the Bible. . . but, in the Christian tradition, we hold that it is unclean and leads to sin.” Wham, done, and easy.

Instead you tried to claim obvious untruths as truth, and further you tried to claim untruths as scripture. You could have easily made the case for “protection of the individual from himself” is a goal of the Christian Church and it’s supported by scripture, and you’d have been golden.

But no, you took the scripture and lied about it. You took scripture and distorted it in an attempt to get it to say what YOU wanted it to.

You’re a pretty sad example of a Christian.

Start simple to redeem yourself. “Go not beyond what is written.”

Jason Coleman on November 20, 2009 at 12:48 AM

Keep it up, Jason. I don’t care how long you live, you’re going to be dead a lot longer than that. I’m warning you. If you keep twisting God’s Word to fit your own wild doctrine or wicked life style you’re in for a rude awakening. One second after you pass from this life unto the next you’ll regret every word you said.

“And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments. . .” Luke 16:23

apacalyps on November 20, 2009 at 2:59 AM

HAHAHAHA I’m the one “twisting”. That’s rich.

Come on now, it’s almost comical how you bend over backwards to avoid confronting that one simple verse.

“Go not beyond what is written.”

Don’t worry about my afterlife. All I have to do is ask for forgiveness and I’ll be fine if I’m wrong about what is or isn’t out there.

You have a much bigger problem. Here you are, confronted by very simple and easy decisions, and rather than face scripture, you have to misrepresent what is written by substituting your own maniacal twist on it.

Once again, as simple as one can make it:

The Bible states masturbation is unclean.
The Bible states that unclean and sin are different.
The Bible says to “go not beyond what is written.”

You state masturbation is sin.
You state that unclean and sin are the same.
You go beyond what is written.

Jason Coleman on November 20, 2009 at 6:26 AM

HAHAHAHA

Jason Coleman on November 20, 2009 at 6:26 AM

I should have gone a long time ago, but this breaks my heart. Your mind is so hardened that it has become reprobate, and the Bible warned about this in Romans 1:18-28. This is the result when you continue to rebel and carry on with your sin, violating your own conscience.

You state masturbation is sin.

I’m making a mistake trying to reason with a reprobate, but I wanna see how far gone you are. I’m gonna dumb this down for you OK, Jason. We’ll look at it from a different angle. The Bible says the only sex that is allowed is sex within the marriage. Masturbation is sex with yourself. Therefore, masturbation is a sin. It falls under the category of adultery and fornication (Hebrew 13:4). Paul says if you’re burning with sexual desires let a man take a wife:

“I say therefore to the unmarried and widows (everyone not married), it is good for them if they abide even as I (good to stay single). But if they cannot contain (refrain from having sex), let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn. And unto the married I command, yet not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife depart from her husband:” 1 Corinthians 7

That’s it. That is it. If they cannot exercise self-control they should marry. So there is only one way. There is only one way that God advocates. That’s in marriage.

I’ll ask you again. You get it now?

apacalyps on November 20, 2009 at 1:20 PM

Knocking down morning wood is VERY well documented and has nothing to do with lusts and arousal via sexual thoughts.

Jason Coleman on November 20, 2009 at 12:48 AM

Show me the documentation.

The erection is a response by your unconscious to prevent you from pissing all over yourself in your sleep.

That is your body doing what it’s supposed to do to prevent you from wetting your bed when you are asleep. When you have a full bladder during sleep the body reacts with an erection to hold the urine in your bladder — this is a natural thing. What does it have to do with masturbating? Are you saying people like masturbating with a full bladder? Are you saying people like having sex when it feels like they are going to wet their pants? I hope not. That’d be either ignorant or lying. What’s really happening is when people wake up in the morning (or whenever) with an erection and a full bladder they first go empty their bladder. Afterwards then think, “Hey! Maybe I should do something with this. I’m feeling a little frisky.” They want sex and are seeking to fufill that desire without being married, which is a sin. So don’t tell me there’s no lust involved. Don’t tell me your doing it for the glory of God. You’re doing it because of lust. You’re doing it because you don’t have self control.

apacalyps on November 20, 2009 at 2:00 PM

Don’t worry about my afterlife. All I have to do is ask for forgiveness and I’ll be fine if I’m wrong about what is or isn’t out there.

Jason Coleman on November 20, 2009 at 6:26 AM

Another misunderstanding of Scripture.

apacalyps on November 20, 2009 at 2:24 PM

Simply not true, you don’t have to lust after someone to masturbate.

Jason Coleman on November 19, 2009 at 8:39 PM

I want an example where you don’t have to lust to masturbate. You haven’t given one. And not that silly illustration about waking up with an erection because of a full bladder, lol. And by the way, masturbation is still a sin whether lust is involved or not. I gave you several examples in Scripture to support that. Each one of us needs to control his own body in holiness and honour. The Bible says we are responsible for the actions of our flesh, “For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad.” 2 Corinthians 5:10

apacalyps on November 20, 2009 at 2:47 PM

Four replies and you still can’t bring yourself to answer to one simple verse.

“Go not beyond what is written” I think I’ve shown beyond any shadow of a doubt that you’ve done just that.

I’m sure I do “misunderstand” scripture in your mind, because according to you, scripture doesn’t have to be taken in context, we don’t have to pay attention to what words actually mean and if we want to just say something is something even if it’s not, we can.

Again, you just can’t bring yourself to address it, can you.

“Go not beyond what is written.”

Jason Coleman on November 20, 2009 at 5:14 PM

“Go not beyond what is written” I think I’ve shown beyond any shadow of a doubt that you’ve done just that.

Jason Coleman on November 20, 2009 at 5:14 PM

You haven’t proven that I’m wrong. And you certainly haven’t proven the Bible wrong. The only thing you have proven is that you are a liar and a coward who doesn’t admit when you are wrong. That’s all you’ve done. That’s all you’ve accomplished.

I’m sure I do “misunderstand” scripture in your mind

You know, the Bible warned us that was going to happen. It says in 2 Peter 3:3, “Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts.” It says they are going to walk after their own lusts. And that is exactly what you’re doing. You are a scoffer walking after your own lusts arguing that masturbation is not a sin.

because according to you, scripture doesn’t have to be taken in context, we don’t have to pay attention to what words actually mean

I asked you for an example where you don’t have to lust to masturbate? You never supplied one. Know why? Because you can’t find one. You claim that people masturbate without lusting without a shred of evidence. Try arguing your case before the judge without any evidence. See what happens. They’ll throw you out of the courtroom. Bottom line: People masturbate because it is a passion of lust. So don’t tell me there’s no lust involved. Don’t tell me your doing it for the glory of God. You’re doing it because of lust! You’re doing it because you don’t have self control! You know one of the things Paul really presses upon Timothy? Presses upon Titus? Presses upon these men — these young men? “Flee youthful lusts” (2 Timothy 2:22). Be self controlled. It’s a self control issue. And I’ll tell you this, if you’re burning with sexual passion get married. God doesn’t give you an outlet with masturbation. He says get married. Be self disciplined, and if you can’t control yourself get married. There’s no other. That’s the only two. You stay single and pure, control your bodies in holiness and in honour, or get married and the outlet for that is the marriage bed. You know what Scripture says in Romans 6:13, “Neither yield ye your members as instruments of unrighteousness unto sin: but yield yourselves unto God, as those that are alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness unto God.” Is there anybody who thinks that presenting your sexual organs to God in masturbation is righteous! Anybody think that’s presenting your members to God!

Listen Jason, I’ve debated a lot of people and people are like puzzles. Sometimes it takes time to figure them out –and I’ve solved the puzzle that you are. You have NOT defeated the word of God with your lies and avoidance of the obvious, you have only condemned yourself! God’s wrath abides on you Jason like a dark cloud, and when you die in your sins you will go to hell. Masturbation is a sin whether you belive it is or not. God is gonna punish thieves, and liars, blasphemers, fornicators. Someone who’s had sex out of marriage and adulterers. You need to repent of your sins and put your faith or trust alone in Jesus Christ. Save yourself before time runs out. Thank you.

apacalyps on November 20, 2009 at 7:15 PM

Jason, I’ve still been following this thread, and I want to ask you as a genuinely concerned person, what do you think you might accomplish debating this self-righteous, abusive, brainless freak of nature? Do you have any indication whatsoever that apacalyps understands what “rational thought” means, let alone knows how to utilize it?

I see and respect your efforts, but I can’t think of a more appropriate time to bring up, “don’t cast your pearls before swine…” Can you?

Bizarro No. 1 on November 20, 2009 at 8:45 PM

Jason, I’ve still been following this thread, ..I see and respect your efforts,

Bizarro No. 1 on November 20, 2009 at 8:45 PM

You have a problem with masturbation too?

apacalyps on November 20, 2009 at 8:57 PM

You have a problem with masturbation too?

apacalyps on November 20, 2009 at 8:57 PM

LOL you moronic pipsqueak, the only problem I have with masturbation is when religious nutcases like you, who are incapable of understanding the significance of the difference between lust in the mind (thought) and lust in the heart (intent), spout off about it and think God cares about the issue the same way you.

A weirdo like you probably believes that people who have wet dreams are sinning in their unconsciousnesses! Go away now, back under the rock from whence you came, you dork!

Bizarro No. 1 on November 20, 2009 at 9:28 PM

(there is a) difference between lust in the mind (thought) and lust in the heart (intent),

Bizarro No. 1 on November 20, 2009 at 9:28 PM

Bizarro, there is freedom from masturbation. You don’t have to live in that sin. Thank you.

apacalyps on November 20, 2009 at 9:48 PM

Hi Biz,

More than anything, I’m just having fun.

I do however find it fascinating the lengths people will go to in order to square what they want scripture to say with what is actually says. Further, I am also very interested in how people misinterpret dogma for actual scriptural instructions.

But mostly just for fun.

Apacalyps,

Come on man, that wasn’t even an attempt to address “go not beyond what is written”.

Let’s hear it, square up “go not beyond what is written” with what you’ve done. At least try.

Jason Coleman on November 20, 2009 at 10:02 PM

Jason, “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do.” John 8:44

apacalyps on November 20, 2009 at 10:58 PM

Apacalyps, “Go not beyond what is written” 1 Corinthians 4:6

Jason Coleman on November 21, 2009 at 12:35 AM

“But, beloved (apacalyps), remember ye the words which were spoken before of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ; How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts. These be they (like Jason) who separate themselves, sensual, having not the Spirit (of God in them).” Jude 1:17-19

apacalyps on November 21, 2009 at 2:20 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5