Video: Obama announces a “jobs summit”

posted at 2:00 pm on November 12, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

Perhaps stung by the elections last week, Barack Obama has decided to call a “jobs summit” to address the rising levels of unemployment that his stimulus package has failed to arrest. He tried again to sell the idea that his administration has slowed unemployment, but the numbers tell another tale:

Over the past 10 months, we’ve taken a number of bold steps to break the back of this recession. We’ve worked to stabilize the financial system, revive lending to small businesses and families, and prevent responsible homeowners from losing their homes. And through the Recovery Act, we’ve cut taxes for middle class families, extended and increased unemployment insurance, and created and saved more than a million jobs.

As a result, the economy is now growing again for the first time in more than a year — and faster than at any time in the past two years. But even though we’ve slowed the loss of jobs — and today’s report on the continued decline in unemployment claims is a hopeful sign — the economic growth that we’ve seen has not yet led to the job growth that we desperately need. As I’ve said from the start of this crisis, hiring often takes time to catch up to economic growth. And given the magnitude of the economic turmoil that we’ve experienced, employers are reluctant to hire.

Obama apparently intends to stick to those “saved or created” numbers, even though the media around the country have exposed them as nothing short of fraudulent. And the job losses have not “slowed” at all. The month-on-month increase from September to October of unemployment was the largest since May, and four times as much as the previous month.  Unemployment accelerated instead of slowing, which is why it hit 10.2% — and why Obama has to be seen to be doing something about it.

But what does he propose as a solution to the private-sector slump?  Obama gives no indication of a plan, but the invitees to the summit are revealing:

We all know that there are limits to what government can and should do, even during such difficult times.  But we have an obligation to consider every additional, responsible step that we can [take] to encourage and accelerate job creation in this country.  And that’s why, in December, we’ll be holding a forum at the White House on jobs and economic growth.  We’ll gather CEOs and small business owners, economists and financial experts, as well as representatives from labor unions and nonprofit groups, to talk about how we can work together to create jobs and get this economy moving again.

Labor unions and non-profits?  These are not the engines of job growth.  In  the case of the unions, they are pushing legislation (Card Check, ObamaCare) that would be job-killers.  And it’s not as if Obama never hears from unions now.  Andy Stern, the president of the SEIU, is one of the most frequent visitors to the White House this year, with Stern himself saying he visits on a weekly basis.  Perhaps Obama should hear a little less from unions and nonprofits, and a little more from the people who actually create jobs.

But what would they tell him?  They would tell him that ObamaCare, cap-and-trade, Card Check, and other expansive government programs on his agenda has kept capital on the sidelines.  Obama needs the unions and the nonprofits around to shout them down and provide some class-warfare balance to ignore the realities of the current economy and the disastrous direction of his agenda.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

The Prezisadunce needs a conference to say this ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F65EYyHhanY

macncheez on November 12, 2009 at 2:37 PM

Summit Czar?

cmsinaz on November 12, 2009 at 2:38 PM

I bet they come up with one snappy “Vision Statement”…

mojo on November 12, 2009 at 2:38 PM

This is exactly what this economy needs…a bunch of interested-parties sitting around talking about creating jobs instead of taking steps to create them.

It’s yet another dog-and-pony show from Teh One. What’s next? Another round of 3-card Monty?

Loser. And a Liar.

Yellowdog12 on November 12, 2009 at 2:39 PM

Obama doesn’t know what to do because he and the people he surrounds himself with don’t believe in an ideology that will grow the economy … they only believe in taking from it.

darwin on November 12, 2009 at 2:39 PM

Then,how about a Blue Ribbon Panel when unemployment hits 12%?
Trusser13 on November 12, 2009 at 2:33 PM

Maybe a Pabst Blue Ribbon, too?

Yellowdog12 on November 12, 2009 at 2:41 PM

Bud, Miller Lite or maybe Keystone Lite?

Hening on November 12, 2009 at 2:42 PM

Uhhh….10 months late there, Mr. President.

Wtf is wrong with this man?

bridgetown on November 12, 2009 at 2:43 PM

RE: Job summit and associated balderdash

Ja, I’m still waiting for someone with national prestige to smack this punk down hard, then when the liberals start screaming, smack them down even harder.

Gonna be a long wait, I suspect. Might have to do it myself. Me and a few of my friends.

Skandia Recluse on November 12, 2009 at 2:44 PM

Clinton used his economic summit to dump the idea of a middle class tax cut, remember?

lorien1973 on November 12, 2009 at 2:45 PM

Uhhh….10 months late there, Mr. President.

Wtf is wrong with this man?

bridgetown on November 12, 2009 at 2:43 PM

Ten months wouldn’t be enough time to tell ya, bridge.

HornetSting on November 12, 2009 at 2:45 PM

If someone has already said this, my apologies.

New Headline:

“Obama Announces Navel Gazing Summitt Sometime in December”

Today, Obama admitted that he’s clueless on economic growth and continues to hold himself and his administration accountable for the failed efforts of the Porkulus Payoff of February 2009. In an effort to further study the failure of his policies, he has invited his followers to a star studded luncheon featuring Kobe beef, arugula, Michelle’s arms and another speechifying session. Following this display of arrogance, hypocracy and narcissism, Obama plans a round circle session of navel gazing. Sometime, in December. Invitation only!

Key West Reader on November 12, 2009 at 2:45 PM

This man makes me want to drink…something strong.
Unfortunately, I’m not employed right now, so I cannot go spending cash on whiskey.
Damn him.

bridgetown on November 12, 2009 at 2:45 PM

The organizer is organizing. He will have meetings and more meetings and meanwhile things will continue to go to hell.

Terrye on November 12, 2009 at 2:46 PM

We all know that there are limits to what government can and should do, even during such difficult times.

This has the auto and bank workers rolling with laughter in the unemployment lines…

right2bright on November 12, 2009 at 2:46 PM

They need to hold the ‘Jobs Summit’ in the bathroom.
What it will produce belongs in the shitter.

HornetSting on November 12, 2009 at 2:46 PM

More statist window dressing to cover up the fact that he’s an incompetent boob.

Obama’s like the useless guy in your office who’s always calling a meeting of the producers to make sure they understand the process of making money. He can’t do it himself, so he’ll enhance his importance by throwing roadblocks in front of those who can.

When everything comes to a halt at the hands of this human anchor, another meeting will be called to announce a new process with more paperwork, approvals, rules and oversight.

In the private sector, those people get fired. In government, they get promoted. Unfortunately, they are now in charge of the private sector as well.

“The founding fathers, in their wisdom, devised a method by which our republic can take one hundred of its most prominent numbskulls and keep them out of the private sector where they might do actual harm.” — P.J. O’Rourke

RadClown on November 12, 2009 at 2:46 PM

This is why, for all the Bush tax cuts, unemployment was never as low under Bush as it was under Clinton.

Please. Unemployment topped out at 6.6% on the last month of Bush’s presidency. He had a post-9-11 recession that lasted for over two years to deal with, in which the rates flucturated between 5.0% and 6.2%. Bush handled it. Obama would KILL for 6.0% unemployment right now.

And something else – in the years when Republicans controlled Congress, the unemployment rate never went above 6.6%. Prior to the Clinton Admin and before the GOP took over Congress in 1994, the unemployment rate fluctuated between 6.5% and 7.8%. After the GOP was voted out in 2006 when the unemployment rate was 4.4% (and after the Democrats were seated in 2007), the unemployment rate from the middle of 2007 and beyond out to now has been steadily increasing.

Coincidence? Nope. This is all BLS data – you have to go to the website and enter years for this information to see it.

And now, we’re at 10.2% unemployment on the Democrats’ and Obama’s watch. This is…what?

Recovery?

You lie. It’s FAILURE on the Democrats’ watch.

Good Lt on November 12, 2009 at 2:50 PM

More statist window dressing to cover up the fact that he’s an incompetent boob.

Obama’s like the useless guy in your office who’s always calling a meeting of the producers to make sure they understand the process of making money. He can’t do it himself, so he’ll enhance his importance by throwing roadblocks in front of those who can.

When everything comes to a halt at the hands of this human anchor, another meeting will be called to announce a new process with more paperwork, approvals, rules and oversight.

In the private sector, those people get fired. In government, they get promoted. Unfortunately, they are now in charge of the private sector as well.

Winnar.

Good Lt on November 12, 2009 at 2:51 PM

Clinton used his economic summit to dump the idea of a middle class tax cut, remember?

lorien1973 on November 12, 2009 at 2:45 PM

Clinton, who presided over the creation of more jobs than any other president? Maybe we should follow his lead.

(Before you yell, Reagan “created” fewer jobs than Clinton but against a lower base, so the percentage lift might have been marginally higher).

Bleeds Blue on November 12, 2009 at 2:51 PM

Summit: nothing achieved but much lip service given and applied.

meMC on November 12, 2009 at 2:52 PM

What for? So he can listen to ideas, then reject them all like he did on Afhghanistan policy?

I think Pres. Lepetomane likes to hold these big meetings, in part, so he can then discard all the ideas and do his own thing to show everyone how smart he is.

TOTUS: I didn’t get a harumph out of that guy.

Axelrod (as Hedley Lamarr): Give the TOTUS a harumph.

reaganaut on November 12, 2009 at 2:54 PM

Clinton, who presided over the creation of more jobs than any other president? Maybe we should follow his lead.

Bleeds Blue on November 12, 2009 at 2:51 PM

And he did it without HillaryCare. How is that possible? I thought government healthcare was also about job creation.

WashJeff on November 12, 2009 at 2:55 PM

He has announced a “jobs summit”
We know what that means
His master Soros is not happy with the current unemployment numbers which are too low. This summit will put in place policies to make the unemployment to go up, way up, waaay up, until the master is pleased.

macncheez on November 12, 2009 at 2:56 PM

(Before you yell, Reagan “created” fewer jobs than Clinton but against a lower base, so the percentage lift might have been marginally higher).

Bleeds Blue on November 12, 2009 at 2:51 PM

Since we plan on putting people in jail for not purchasing obamadeathcare, can we put people in jail for just being plain stupid. This wetend is defending Nancy Pelosi wanting to put people in jail, against the constitution. Now this.
Must be nice to live up your unicorn’s ass, blowhole.

HornetSting on November 12, 2009 at 2:56 PM

What do people expect? This is a president who thinks money comes from grants.

Ted Torgerson on November 12, 2009 at 2:56 PM

Well, better late than never, I guess.

Bill Clinton had an economic summit like this before he was even inaugurated. That’s how you shows the country you care about unemployment. It’s stunning to me how totally tone-deaf this White House has been about the reality of high unemployment in this country. It is a shame that we had to get over 10% and have a shocking election for them to even notice.

rockmom on November 12, 2009 at 2:58 PM

This is why, for all the Bush tax cuts, unemployment was never as low under Bush as it was under Clinton.

Please. Unemployment topped out at 6.6% on the last month of Bush’s presidency. He had a post-9-11 recession that lasted for over two years to deal with, in which the rates flucturated between 5.0% and 6.2%. Bush handled it. Obama would KILL for 6.0% unemployment right now.

And something else – in the years when Republicans controlled Congress, the unemployment rate never went above 6.6%. Prior to the Clinton Admin and before the GOP took over Congress in 1994, the unemployment rate fluctuated between 6.5% and 7.8%. After the GOP was voted out in 2006 when the unemployment rate was 4.4% (and after the Democrats were seated in 2007), the unemployment rate from the middle of 2007 and beyond out to now has been steadily increasing.

Coincidence? Nope. This is all BLS data – you have to go to the website and enter years for this information to see it.

And now, we’re at 10.2% unemployment on the Democrats’ and Obama’s watch. This is…what?

Recovery?

You lie. It’s FAILURE on the Democrats’ watch.

Please. If the Republicans in Congress during Clinton were responsible for his success, the Democrats were responsible for Reagan’s.

Under the Clinton, the economy spent 25 months with unemployment below George Bush’s lowest rate, and the short-lived recession that began under Clinton never pushed unemployment above 6%. And, by the way, we didn’t have to spend a couple of trillion to get out of it.

The Bush recession is at 10.2% and still climbing — and costing.

Bleeds Blue on November 12, 2009 at 2:59 PM

Barack Obama has decided to call a “jobs summit”

Obama, saving or creating jobs in the PowerPoint slide industry.

BDU-33 on November 12, 2009 at 2:59 PM

You lie. It’s FAILURE on the Democrats’ watch.

Good Lt on November 12, 2009 at 2:50 PM

Slow Moe Bo and San Fran’s reaction. YOU. MUST. NOT. OPPOSE.

Key West Reader on November 12, 2009 at 2:59 PM

Bleeds Blue on November 12, 2009 at 2:59 PM

David! So glad you could make it today.

Key West Reader on November 12, 2009 at 3:00 PM

Bleeds Blue on November 12, 2009 at 2:51 PM

Clinton’s own advisors admit he benefited from a tech bubble. He also did not try – well after the health care debacle – to nationalize huge swaths of the economy. And create trillions of dollars in debt.

Thanks to the post 94 republican congress, the deficits were going down and after the 1997 tax cuts were enacted, which helped real wage growth, the deficit and gdp growth.

And now ask yourself, do you see democrats in 2009 doing anything like a 1997 tax cut that will spur economic growth, job growth and real wage growth? Or will they continue to push economy crushing proposals?

Since your only answer is “no” and “yes” respectively – wonder to yourself why you continue to support these idiots.

lorien1973 on November 12, 2009 at 3:00 PM

A jobs summit?? Why is he waiting until next month? Jobs are needed NOW! Why did he wait until unemployment hit 10.2%?? WORSE president ever!!

Obama’s summit will arrive too late to save Christmas…

TN Mom on November 12, 2009 at 3:01 PM

Clinton, who presided over the creation of more jobs than any other president? Maybe we should follow his lead.

Bleeds Blue on November 12, 2009 at 2:51 PM

Presided = Watched the dotcom boom happen.

LOL

Blowjob = Not sexual relationship

LOL


Fought Terrorism
= Kept his distance from Hillary

LOL

fogw on November 12, 2009 at 3:02 PM

The Bush recession is at 10.2% and still climbing — and costing.

Bleeds Blue on November 12, 2009 at 2:59 PM

I thought, that on Oct 29th, the Bush recession was over the Obama recovery had begun.

Your continued masturbation to bush hate is an old tired shtick that normal people are sick of.

lorien1973 on November 12, 2009 at 3:02 PM

Must be nice to live up your unicorn’s ass, blowhole.

HornetSting on November 12, 2009 at 2:56 PM

LMAO – gotta remember that one!

Mark Boabaca on November 12, 2009 at 3:02 PM

Clinton, who presided over the creation of more jobs than any other president? Maybe we should follow his lead.

(Before you yell, Reagan “created” fewer jobs than Clinton but against a lower base, so the percentage lift might have been marginally higher).

Bleeds Blue on November 12, 2009 at 2:51 PM

Clinton did a good job on the economy. It’s stupid for us to pretend otherwise. He had some help, with many states cutting taxes and reforming welfare and with the creation of the Internet spurring the dot-com boom, and the economy was actually growing when he took office. But overall he should get very high marks for his economic policies.

It’s too bad that our Narcissist-in-Chief is so obsessed with not doing anything the way Clinton would.

rockmom on November 12, 2009 at 3:02 PM

Miuntes from the Obama job summit

Obama: Well Andy, what do you suggest?

Stern: Mr. President … I think you should raise taxes. A percentage of those taxes invested in unions such as SEIU would be used to create jobs!

Obama: Why Andy … that’s a brilliant suggestion! How much do you think SEIU needs?

Stern: Speaking conservatively, if I can use that word in your presence, I believe 50-100 billion a year to SEIU would ignite the economic engine.

Obama: Fantasic! Well ladies and gentlemen … I hadn’t expected to resolve this issue so quickly but I believe Andy Stern has the right approach and I thank you all for coming.

Dateline 2011: US Economy collapses.

darwin on November 12, 2009 at 3:02 PM

Clinton did a good job on the economy.

rockmom on November 12, 2009 at 3:02 PM

Clinton had to work with a Republican Congress.

darwin on November 12, 2009 at 3:03 PM

When you have no answers, call a summit.

JammieWearingFool on November 12, 2009 at 3:03 PM

but when they get to talking to government officials they tend to talk more about tax cuts that swell profits without enhancing employment.

Where to start… where to start.

Profits don’t enhance employment? Profits run the economy! Profits mean a business can pay back creditors faster, it means employees get bonuses (which go back into the economy creating retail jobs, which create manufacturing jobs, service jobs).

Profits mean that a business can grow and invest in the future, which means more workers. Profits find their way to shareholders, and into the hands of those evil traders on Wall Sreet, who buy things, which creates retail jobs, that creates manufacturing jobs, that creates service jobs….

Unreakingbelievable.

reaganaut on November 12, 2009 at 3:04 PM

He is……. Just a total failure. But I do agree somewhat, we don`t need a job summit, but a jobs fair. Perhaps Obama will find something he`s good at and leave the White House.

ThePrez on November 12, 2009 at 3:04 PM

It’s too bad that our Narcissist-in-Chief is so obsessed with not doing anything the way Clinton would.

rockmom on November 12, 2009 at 3:02 PM

Clinton signed welfare reform, which forced people off welfare and into jobs.

Obama is creating obamacare, which is forcing people out of jobs and into welfare.

lorien1973 on November 12, 2009 at 3:04 PM

This ought to be hilarious if it wasn’t so tragic about the job situation in this country. More dithering made to stall and buy time in hopes the phony “jobs saved and created” number cookers can come up with something more than just thin air. This is starting to look like Afghanastan war council redux.

kens on November 12, 2009 at 3:05 PM

Obama is amazed that inspite of his best efforts, some people still have jobs. His “jobs summit” will find the reasons behind this travesty and punish those who are active participants in such ant-Obama activities

macncheez on November 12, 2009 at 3:05 PM

Of course, Bill Clinton also pushed through the big changes in Community Reinvestment Act regulations, and he signed the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act in 1999. Both helped create the housing and subprime mortgage boom and bust of this decade.

rockmom on November 12, 2009 at 3:06 PM

The Bush Barney Frank recession is at 10.2% and still climbing — and costing.

Bleeds Blue on November 12, 2009 at 2:59 PM

FIFY !

darwin on November 12, 2009 at 3:07 PM

The Bush recession is at 10.2% and still climbing — and costing.

Bleeds Blue on November 12, 2009 at 2:59 PM

Barney Frank and Chris Dodd…they have been in charge since early 2007 and against the pleas to keep an eye on Fannie and Freddie, they marched on…right up till we almost dropped into a depression.
Stimulus pkg 2009, obama’s continued meddling in the nation’s economy~you can’t blame Bush anymore, blowhole.

HornetSting on November 12, 2009 at 3:08 PM

When you have no answers, call a summit.

JammieWearingFool on November 12, 2009 at 3:03 PM

That’s exactly right. He should have done this before or immediately after he took office. It looks pitiful and weak to do it now.

rockmom on November 12, 2009 at 3:08 PM

darwin on November 12, 2009 at 3:07 PM

Great minds, Charles. Great minds.

HornetSting on November 12, 2009 at 3:08 PM

rockmom on November 12, 2009 at 3:08 PM

He did. That’s where the brilliance that is the porkulus came from. His first summit.

These summits are all retarded. The people there are all hand picked, designed to create some false consensus on action. Action that had already been decided upon already. Just to make it seem like everyone agrees.

It’s just an excuse for porkulus 2: the quickening.

lorien1973 on November 12, 2009 at 3:09 PM

Hey Barry, you want to spur job growth in this country?

Resign.

Vashta.Nerada on November 12, 2009 at 3:10 PM

What does Obama know about business or jobs?

-He’s not qualified to run any type of business, from a hot dog cart to a large corporation. But he runs the country.
-He’s never produced a thing.
-He’s never sold a thing, besides himself.
-He’s never been depressed on pay day. Not for how little money he’s grossed, but because the check is 25%,30%,40% lighter. And then imagines the debt, bills, investment, savings or new business idea the money could go towards.

Devrbd on November 12, 2009 at 3:10 PM

Is Mr. Dithers getting grayer? Maybe he will have a hair summit to discuss how leaders who don’t lead have to deal with the telltale signs of stress that come from being a Marxist liar! Just how gullible is the American public to fall for these stupid summits as a solution to anything? My idea for a great campaign slogan in 2010/12 is – Snap Out of it America!

redwhiteblue on November 12, 2009 at 3:10 PM

The Bush recession is over. The Obama recovery has begin.

Bleeds Blue on October 29, 2009 at 9:32 AM

WashJeff on November 12, 2009 at 3:14 PM

Feeling useless? Bored? Lonely?

Call a meeting! Make friends! Drink coffee! Eat doughnuts! All at someone else’s expense!

RadClown on November 12, 2009 at 3:14 PM

Question for Bleeds Blue : What was it that Bush did to cause the recession?

ThePrez on November 12, 2009 at 3:15 PM

Barney Frank and Chris Dodd…they have been in charge since early 2007 and against the pleas to keep an eye on Fannie and Freddie, they marched on…right up till we almost dropped into a depression.
Stimulus pkg 2009, obama’s continued meddling in the nation’s economy~you can’t blame Bush anymore, blowhole.

HornetSting on November 12, 2009 at 3:08 PM

I guess what you’re saying here is that George Bush was so pathetic that a couple of committee chairman were running the country. Remind what major legislation Frank and Dodd pushed through that changed the banking system that a Republican Congress had been running for more than a decade.

I guess what you’re also saying is that you forget that the first domino — the subprime collapse, fell before the ’06 election, under an all-Republican, all-the-time watch.

Bleeds Blue on November 12, 2009 at 3:18 PM

Shhhhh…a real President is speaking!

royzer on November 12, 2009 at 3:19 PM

…on Fox news only…not the other networks.

royzer on November 12, 2009 at 3:21 PM

Question for Bleeds Blue : What was it that Bush did to cause the recession?

Nurtured the housing bubble and then acted slowly when it collapsed. Failed to notice when the banking system behaved like pigs in a trough. Failed to regulate trading of derivatives. Kept interest rates artificially low. Ran a war without paying for it.

Bleeds Blue on November 12, 2009 at 3:21 PM

HornetSting on November 12, 2009 at 3:08 PM
I guess what you’re saying here is that George Bush was so pathetic that a couple of committee chairman were running the country. Remind what major legislation Frank and Dodd pushed through that changed the banking system that a Republican Congress had been running for more than a decade.

I guess what you’re also saying is that you forget that the first domino — the subprime collapse, fell before the ‘06 election, under an all-Republican, all-the-time watch.

Bleeds Blue on November 12, 2009 at 3:18 PM

Let’s see. Who holds the purse strings in the three parts of government?

1. The Executive.
2. The Congress.
3. The Judicial.

While you’re refreshing yourself on the constitution, blowhole, you should also take a government civics class.
Anyone that is ignorant enough to defend putting someone in jail for not having health insurance should probably not bother worrying about the constitution. What do we need that old, tired paper for anyway, right blowhole?

So, have you house broken your unicorn hat yet, blowhole?

HornetSting on November 12, 2009 at 3:24 PM

Obama’s jobs summit is the equivalent of the Dover AFB photo op.

By the way, per Joe Biden, jobs is a three letter word.

olesparkie on November 12, 2009 at 3:25 PM

I guess what you’re also saying is that you forget that the first domino — the subprime collapse, fell before the ‘06 election, under an all-Republican, all-the-time watch.

Bleeds Blue on November 12, 2009 at 3:18 PM

President Bush and John McCain BOTH warned about the Fannie/Freddy collapse in 2005.
But, in 2007, the democrats took over. Game over. Collapse was allowed to happen.
Trickle up poverty came to pass in February, 2009.

HornetSting on November 12, 2009 at 3:26 PM

Perhaps Obama should hear a little less from unions and nonprofits, and a little more from the people who actually create jobs.
But what would they tell him?

What if, just for my fantasy, what if the invitations sent out to small business owners and none came?

That, by itself, would tell Obama so much.

Sir Napsalot on November 12, 2009 at 3:27 PM

By the way, per Joe Biden, jobs is a three letter word.

olesparkie on November 12, 2009 at 3:25 PM

And, for obama, jobs is a four letter word not to be uttered in his presence.
BTW, love your name~we should have our government sit in your ‘lap’. :)

HornetSting on November 12, 2009 at 3:28 PM

From James P. Article yesterday.

12. After all, the recession ended in November 2001 with an unemployment rate at 5.5% and yet the unemployment rate did not peak until June 2003, at 6.3%. The recession ended in March 1991 when the jobless rate was 6.8% and it did not peak until June 1992, at 7.8%. In both cases, the unemployment rate peaked well more than a year after the recession technically ended. The 2001 cycle was a tech capital stock deflation; the 1991 cycle was the Savings & Loan debacle; this past cycle was an asset deflation and credit collapse of epic proportions. And economists think that the unemployment rate is in the process of cresting now? Just remember it is the same consensus community that predicted at the beginning of 2008 that the jobless rate would peak out below 6% this cycle.

If history holds, this means unemployment peaking around fall 2010. Just in time for election. Hate to play politics with this number, but that is the game (see Dems 2002 and 2004).

WashJeff on November 12, 2009 at 3:28 PM

“Present”

NumberTwo on November 12, 2009 at 3:28 PM

What does Obama know about business or jobs?

If he didn’t know how businesses worked, how could he design his policies to make them fail?

-He’s not qualified to run any type of business, from a hot dog cart to a large corporation. But he runs the country.

He did run a campaign didn’t he ? he said so himself

-He’s never produced a thing.

Wrong again. He doesn’t just produces, he reproduces. He has 2 daughters , that counts

-He’s never sold a thing, besides himself.

He sold SEIU’s healthscare to the house, didn’t he?

-He’s never been depressed on pay day. Not for how little money he’s grossed, but because the check is 25%,30%,40% lighter. And then imagines the debt, bills, investment, savings or new business idea the money could go towards.

You got me there

Devrbd on November 12, 2009 at 3:10 PM

macncheez on November 12, 2009 at 3:29 PM

“Jobs Summit” you say?
I say it’s just more HOCUS POTUS.

westerncanadian on November 12, 2009 at 3:31 PM

And non-profits, all the folks who now are carrying on for Acorn.

PattyJ on November 12, 2009 at 3:43 PM

A rudderless ship.

SouthernGent on November 12, 2009 at 3:44 PM

(Before you yell, Reagan “created” fewer jobs than Clinton but against a lower base, so the percentage lift might have been marginally higher).

Bleeds Blue on November 12, 2009 at 2:51 PM

And Reagan created the most number of small minority business owners…but you don’t care.
You don’t understand that no matter what happens…no real recovering until the gov. stops uncontrolled spending…whether Republican or democrat, and right now it is and has been democrat.
Spending has to stop…but liberals can’t grasp that, that is beyond their thought…but you don’t care, as long as you get yours.

right2bright on November 12, 2009 at 3:47 PM

Obama is going to fire Gibbs then say “jk, see people I am saving jobs as we speak”

Tremmy on November 12, 2009 at 3:48 PM

Nurtured the housing bubble and then acted slowly when it collapsed. Failed to notice when the banking system behaved like pigs in a trough. Failed to regulate trading of derivatives. Kept interest rates artificially low. Ran a war without paying for it.

Bleeds Blue on November 12, 2009 at 3:21 PM

All you listed were under democrat controll…Dodd, Frank, remember? They blocked the bills to have these things turned around…but what Bush did, was not veto the spending by the dems. That is where the real problem lies, uncontrolled spending by congress…and Bush was at fault for not stopping the dems.

right2bright on November 12, 2009 at 3:50 PM

Bleeds Blue on November 12, 2009 at 3:21 PM

I hate it when students post here…they just don’t have the history or experience to understand basic economic principles…cut overhead, stop spending, increase efficiency and production. Pretty basic stuff, even for a liberal. Learn it before you continue your education…

right2bright on November 12, 2009 at 3:52 PM

Clinton, who presided over the creation of more jobs than any other president? Maybe we should follow his lead.

Bleeds Blue on November 12, 2009 at 2:51 PM

A GOP Congress that constrained spending to record lows and cut taxes on investment? Sign me up.

Chuck Schick on November 12, 2009 at 3:58 PM

Didn’t Clinton have frequent “job” meetings at the White House?

marklmail on November 12, 2009 at 4:04 PM

Didn’t Clinton have frequent “job” meetings at the White House?

marklmail on November 12, 2009 at 4:04 PM

That blows
Hahahahaha

macncheez on November 12, 2009 at 4:11 PM

This stunt is designed to give President Obama political cover for Porkulus 2: Deficit Boogaloo.

Mike Honcho on November 12, 2009 at 4:33 PM

Rome is burning, and Obama announces that in a month he’ll invite a bunch of navel-contemplaters to come to the WH, drop their drawers, and fill cups with urine to pour on the fire.

This guy is an idiot.

BuckeyeSam on November 12, 2009 at 4:33 PM

Now that’s just effin pathetic — a summit?

This is what you get when you put a leftist in office — endless speeches and group therapy sessions.

One term president, guaranteed.

Richard Romano on November 12, 2009 at 4:42 PM

I can only draw two conclusions from this:

1. His Libtardness/Marxist ideology is so entrenched he really thinks this will accomplish something.

2. He doesn’t really think it will work, knows it won’t, and is actually trying to help the house of cards to collapse.

Dr. ZhivBlago on November 12, 2009 at 4:48 PM

Excellent. Tell that to the 15 people whose jobs at the health insurance company i work for were “no longer necessary” as of this week. I’m sure a “jobs summit” will ease their pain.

(being downsized in anticipation of health care reform passing has to suck.)

mjk on November 12, 2009 at 4:49 PM

I thought he was “saving and creating” so many jobs?

So the guys one decision from the past month – other than date night – is to hold a summit to talk about doing something for something he and his acolytes say there is no need to do – since they are “saving and creating” so many jobs.

This guy is clearly a mystery wrapped in a riddle wrapped in a enigma wrapped in a steaming pile of shite!

catmman on November 12, 2009 at 4:52 PM

Clinton, who presided over the creation of more jobs than any other president? Maybe we should follow his lead. Bleeds Blue on November 12, 2009 at 2:51 PM

I agree. Clinton was coerced by the citizenry into passing welfare reform and millions of hammock hugging duffs had to go to work because they couldn’t justify staying on the public dole forevah! I’m for Clinton’s biggest contribution to lowering the unemployed rare

chickasaw42 on November 12, 2009 at 5:06 PM

Lord Barry think rilly, rilly hard and fix everything!

ronsfi on November 12, 2009 at 5:15 PM

Will there be beer?

vcferlita on November 12, 2009 at 5:21 PM

To solve the jobs issue Obama needs to follow the same game plan for Obamacare ….force everyone to get a job or go to jail.

tommer74 on November 12, 2009 at 5:27 PM

Jobs? Can you say obama corps? This is when America gets its new Stasi or brown shirts, or whatever the new army of jobless inner city youts is called.Remember the o promised an army as well funded as our military to protect us here in the good ol USA.This is the time, under the auspices of job creation, that we the citizens of this late great republic, feel the boot of oppression on our necks.Something wicked this way comes.It’s name is oblabalamadingdong…

huckelberry on November 12, 2009 at 5:38 PM

Obama is amazed that inspite of his best efforts, some people still have jobs. His “jobs summit” will find the reasons behind this travesty and punish those who are active participants in such ant-Obama activities

macncheez on November 12, 2009 at 3:05 PM

phucken a. LMAO.

huckelberry on November 12, 2009 at 5:50 PM

Those who can…. do!
Those who cannot…..summit.

Never did anything in his life, how could we ever expect the idiot to make decisions on such weighty matters. He doesn’t even know what or where the War College is!! pos

highninside on November 12, 2009 at 6:00 PM

Just keep up the lies Obama you can get those approval numbers lower than now… just keep on trying! Yes you can!

petunia on November 12, 2009 at 6:27 PM

To solve the jobs issue Obama needs to follow the same game plan for Obamacare ….force everyone to get a job or go to jail.

tommer74 on November 12, 2009 at 5:27 PM

A simple elegant Democratic solution if I ever saw one!

Jail time and fines for the unemployed! You know they are just doing this to make Obama look bad.

petunia on November 12, 2009 at 6:29 PM

enough of this “saved or created jobs” it sounds so weak. What will be next?

jaboba on November 12, 2009 at 7:37 PM

Relax folks.

Teh Prez just misspoke. He really wants everyone to come to the WH for a jobs fair!

dissent555 on November 12, 2009 at 8:23 PM

Please. If the Republicans in Congress during Clinton were responsible for his success, the Reagan Democrats were responsible for Reagan’s.

Under the Clinton, the economy spent 25 months with unemployment below George Bush’s lowest rate, and the short-lived recession that began under Clinton never pushed unemployment above 6%. And, by the way, we didn’t have to spend a couple of trillion to get out of it.

The Bush WH (questionable, but since he never vetoed anything, go ahead and blame him for signing bills) AND the 2006 House of Donks recession is at 10.2% and still climbing stopped at 6.6%. Obambi took over and with Donk majorities in both houses ramped it up to 10.2% in 9 short months and counting — and costing.

Bleeds Blue on November 12, 2009 at 2:59 PM

Reason your blood bleeds blue is a profound lack of oxygen to your brain, what’s left of it.

IIRC, it was Reagan Democrats that gave Tip O’Neill and Frank Whatizface (Wright?? what got busted selling his “best-seller” paperback, weighing in at a couple dozen pages down in Texas) AND Rockefeller RINOs (Voodoo economics) the fits. Reagan Democrats, some who eventually flipped to the GOP to finally give a slim majority in the next round of election. They are the ones that credit should be given for giving Reagan what he sought after all those years – reduced capital gains and lowered taxes. Unfortunately, too little, too late to vindicate Reagan during his terms. The validity of his ideas lifted Papa Bush’s term and could have continued, except PB defaulted back to his brand of anti-voodoo economics.

Clinton did what he did to triangulate and to be in front of the inevitable and not out of any core belief. His success lies not in that he was “right” but that libtards like you blindly cite him as if Donks like Slick led the way to recovery.

AH_C on November 12, 2009 at 8:32 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3