Video: Bolton blasts Obama’s delay on Afghanistan
posted at 10:12 am on November 12, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
After the news broke last night that Barack Obama had rejected all of the options presented to him on how to proceed in Afghanistan, John Bolton blasted Obama for failing to provide leadership on the issue. The conflicting leaks coming from the White House shows weakness and division, which strongly hints that Barack Obama has not exercised any control over the debate in the War Room. Bolton calls this a “slow motion train wreck” (via The Right Scoop):
Bolton makes the good point that Obama has been working on this for almost four months, not two or three. However, Bolton doesn’t point out that Obama has been pushing a counterinsurgency strategy in Afghanistan for almost three years, and committed the nation to it eight months ago. Resourcing and strategy should have already been clear. The leaks don’t just show dissension among the President’s staff, which always happens, but flat-out ignorance of what COIN meant, a point the Washington Post confirmed a month ago.
The big problem here isn’t a show of vacillation or even of weak leadership, although those are secondary problems. The real damage has come from an unmistakable display of incompetence and lack of preparation. Tossing out all of the options derived over months of analysis at this late date underscores that conclusion. If the President couldn’t get one good option from all of this time contemplating the Afghanistan navel, then Obama needs to replace his West Wing team with people who are competent and informed.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
I pray for our troops.
publiuspen on November 12, 2009 at 11:03 AM
Silly me, actually believing that 0bama would actually DO SOMETHING besides pontificate and waffle.
The longer he dithers, the more troops get killed by ridiculous ROE’s, the more American liberators risk overstaying their welcome, and the more the total war cost spirals into the heavens. This HAS to be deliberate. Even he’s not so clueless to not realize the final outcome of prolonged do-nothingness: a complete crumbling of national will to the point where everyone and their brother is calling for an immediate, total retreat.
Dark-Star on November 12, 2009 at 11:04 AM
Between Obama’s lack of emotion on Ft. Hood and his dithering on Afghanistan and Harry “the war is lost” Reid, is it “jumping to conclusions” to say that Democrats have probably lost the military vote forever?
uknowmorethanme on November 12, 2009 at 11:04 AM
Pinnochio is flippin the US military and the country the bird just like he did Hillary! He will not announce a decision until he gets a healthcare bill, and like a petulant, narcissistic child, he will do the most damage he can to those who would deny him with this decision should his healthcare efforts go down in flames.
There is always a price to be paid for denying the Chitown punks their spoils and defeat in Afgahanistan will be the price for denial of a HealthScare bill!
IMPEACH the usurpers!
dhunter on November 12, 2009 at 11:07 AM
Not a problem, military ballots don’t get counted anyway, certainly not the overseas ones.
Hey Michael Steele , RNC are you doing ANYTHING about this and the open primaries problems?
dhunter on November 12, 2009 at 11:10 AM
MAN! I freakin would LOVE that.
royzer on November 12, 2009 at 11:10 AM
Can you say “he’s stalling” boys and girls.
rich801 on November 12, 2009 at 11:11 AM
The invite only to Elmendorf Airforce Base for presentdent obama today will be interesting. I am gagging at the pictures the “Alaskan Bloggers” are going to post.
I hope obama falls on the runway and no soldier pics him up.
upinak on November 12, 2009 at 11:13 AM
Our great troops have gotten the job done in many wars with some incompetence at the senior civilian levels, but this is different: This time there is presidential contempt for the military and no understanding of the American role in the world.
GaltBlvnAtty on November 12, 2009 at 11:17 AM
Invite only huh?
Narcissist, sissy and coward – afraid to hear what the majority of Americans think of him and his presidential side show.
fogw on November 12, 2009 at 11:18 AM
Obama’s performance as CiC is disgraceful and inexcusable.
Christien on November 12, 2009 at 11:19 AM
isn’t date night a on Friday….whew..it’s been a tuff week..BHO IN DA HOUSE…
JJKRN on November 12, 2009 at 11:23 AM
A slow motion bus wreck. This is typical for someone who’s used to voting present.
Kissmygrits on November 12, 2009 at 11:28 AM
The Bolton approach is to follow the advice of capable and experienced military officers.
The left seems to think that warfare is a simple thing, you just run around and kill bad guys. That’s merely the most immediate and obvious aspect of war, and is the part that Hollywood focuses on almost exclusively.
War is also a complex intellectual exercise in tactics, strategy, logistics, leadership, and extracting reality from a fog of uncertainty. It is grand master chess plus high-stakes poker, and it is a game that generals must excel at.
There is far more to it than “simply sending more troops”, and Bolton and McCrystal are well aware of that. But you have to have the troops if you are to do the necessary work.
ZenDraken on November 12, 2009 at 11:31 AM
Got a whole lot of slobbery payback to hand out to the Libspaz Lapdog Brigade that did the number on Palin.
BigWyo on November 12, 2009 at 11:32 AM
The base is more or less closed and there is no way I would even b able to get near the runway. Maybe I can get a friend to take pictures… from the atwood building.
upinak on November 12, 2009 at 11:33 AM
Obama was a back seat driver his entire career on the issue of defense. He did absolutely nothing but shout that every military decision was always wrong — no matter what decision that was.
Now that Obama has the driver’s seat, he churlishly crossed his arms, making sure that none of his fingerprints are on the the wheel.
When (not if, but when) the inevitable crash comes, he is planning to blame it on the guy who was driving last year.
logis on November 12, 2009 at 11:36 AM
Obama said that while he won’t put preconditions on talks with Iran, he would require preparation. If this is his idea of preparation, I need to get into the fallout shelter business.
Kafir on November 12, 2009 at 11:40 AM
Heh. So you’re a military expert too. Whatever would we do here with out your brilliant insights I just don’t know.?
4shoes on November 12, 2009 at 11:42 AM
Obama’s head is like a giant cooter. His brain is the g-spot and no one can figure out where it is, or if it even exists.
lorien1973 on November 12, 2009 at 11:42 AM
This statement, notably “we must win”, makes perfect sense if our CiC is a Manchurian candidate…
SPCOlympics on November 12, 2009 at 11:50 AM
Obama is stalling while soldiers are dying.
shick on November 12, 2009 at 11:51 AM
To McChrystal, Obama’s hand-picked general, the meaning of COIN is winning muslim “hearts and minds” and not be “pre-occupied” with protection of our own forces.
MB4 on November 12, 2009 at 11:55 AM
My sense is that Obambi wants to pull out in the worst way, but is waiting for something, anything, to happen to give him “cover.”
james23 on November 12, 2009 at 12:02 PM
For Obama to “replace his West Wing team with people that are informed and competent” would mean hiring no more Democrats. If he did that it would mean they’d know more about the world than he does. Wait. Everyone already does, regardless of party. Hmmm. A conundrum, for sure. Flip a coin Obama, choose “heads”. Or “tails”. Maybe both. Then blame Bush. He did it.
bradley11 on November 12, 2009 at 12:02 PM
Breaking news~!
Obama spotted at Waffle House.
Syrupy speech at 11.
profitsbeard on November 12, 2009 at 12:05 PM
Government clean of corruption? Like in Chicago, you mean?
peski on November 12, 2009 at 12:10 PM
Ed,
Your points regarding Team Obama’s unpreparedness, underinformed, and lack of clarity of the meaning of COIN are incontravertably true. After supposed thorough analysis and selection of COIN as the way to go last March, and susequent reversal of that analysis, there is the implication by your piece that this does not make a lot of sense. That there is a contradiction between Team Obama’s actions, or lack there-of, and their stated ambition’s to arrive at the optimum outcome in the Af-Pak theatre.
A wise and now seemingly sage philosopher once wrote that, “Contradictions do not exist. Whenever you think you are facing a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong”. I think which premise you will find wrong is the understood definition of what is commonly considered optimal and what Team Obama deems optimal.
As one who worked since 12/26/07 building oppo-research files in connection with one of the presidential election campaigns, my familiarity from that work on Mr Obama is fairly extensive. We are all familiar with Mr Obama;s ties to ACORN, Working Family’s Party, SEIU, AFSCME, etc. What is not as widely known is that the pivotal players in these Org’s as well as substantial others in key positions that helped bring Mr Obama to power, all came out of one original organization back in the 60′s. The Student for a Democratic Society (SDS), and the Weather Underground (WU). Though I have exchanged some terse discourse with former member, Carl Davidson over the joint categorization of the SDS/WU in the comments section after I wrote this article;
http://papundits.wordpress.com/2009/03/12/the-obama-economic-medicine-triage-or-euthanasia/
I liken the relationship between the SDS & WU as that of the IRA & Sinn Fein, one uses direct violence to acheive it’s goals, the other indirectly supports it. Note that Davidson did not dipute the facts those listed were part of the Obama presidential effort, or their stated ambition to over the Democratic Republic of The United States and replace it with Communist rule.
A wise woman once wrote, that; “Contradictions do not exist. Whenever you think you are facing a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong.” The contradiction in this case is your premise that our Af-Pak egagement results in successfully carrying out our “stated goals” there, and re-establishing con fidence among our allies and the rest of the world that we are a reliable partner. I would posit, given those that brought him to the dance and those that are currently twirling about the floor with him have distinctly differnt ideas.
This comment has sparked a stream of conciousness that I can see as the basis of my next article, almost all which seem to originate from my dialogue here on HA, and so will close with the list below. It is an incomplete list of SDS/WU members off the top-of-my-head as the drive with the data on this subject isn’t with me, but all of the listed are directly either part of Obama’s election and/or his coterie of advisors counseling him now. I would list all of their affiliations, except as we have seen with ACORN and it’s appendages they are constantly shuffled around between them, but a simple Google search will reveal their inter-connections. Some you may recognize, others not so much.
Mark Rudd, Carl Davidson, Todd Gitlin, Marilyn Katz, Tom Hayden, Steve Tappis, Andy Stern, Howie Machtlinger, Dale Rathke, Wade Rathke, Paul Booth, Heather Booth, David Fenton, Jeff Jones, Jim Jacobs, and of course Bill Ayers & Bernadine Dorhn. My memory is failing me right now, but if I remember correctly I had positively ID’d 27 that meet this criteria, though I sure there are more that I’ve yet to track down and/or place.
Archimedes on November 12, 2009 at 12:37 PM
Damn! Lost my place answering the phone and totally botched that last post, stream of conciousness my a$$! Unconciousness is more like it, sorry for the double quote and prolly many more errors.
Archimedes on November 12, 2009 at 12:40 PM
I think Barack is chocking because he has been hanging out with the AmeriKKKa is evil crowd all his life. Now he is gulping at the realization that he is the evil President of the AmeriKKKan empire. He isn’t looking for anything at this point other than a way to cut and run.
Heftyjo on November 12, 2009 at 1:11 PM
Err… Bush delayed doing anything about Afghanistan for 7 years.
Let me repeat that:
Bush delayed doing anything about Afghanistan for 7 years.
And after all that delay… he did nothing.
So why complain about the fact that Obama is trying to actually think this through and get it right?
I mean, no matter what happens in Afghanistan, it’s not going to end up being all flowers and pretty music any time in the next several years. Even if we make the least-bad choices, there will still be serious negatives. So gear up to blast him for those, once they’re apparent.
On neither a policy nor political level do you gain anything by whining about Obama taking his time to decide what to do about the mess Bush made and did nothing about for 7 years.
(By the way, if you want to be intellectually honest about this, you might at least mention the fact that there was a highly-contested election in Afghanistan that surely threw a kink into the plans they had formulated.)
orange on November 12, 2009 at 1:15 PM
What a circus.
Terrye on November 12, 2009 at 1:33 PM
Decide to win and then do what is necessary to end it, or pull out with the clear message to the Afghanistan people that if they or their territory is implicated in acts against the US or its allies, we will…. well, that is the problem for you folks that want us to leave, unless you are willing to nuke them, they will be harboring and developing Islamist terrorism there. Conventional air campaigns require us to have a long term committment and the US people have proven not to have that capability without proper leadership and we will not get that from the Islamists best friend, Obama
georgealbert on November 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM
Uh, Orange, reworking your quote slightly to highlight its idiocy: “Err… Roosevelt delayed doing anything about Japan for 4 years.
Let me repeat that:
Roosevelt delayed doing anything about Japan for 4 years.
And after all that delay… he did nothing.
So why complain about the fact that Truman is trying to actually think this through and get it right?”
A little context is not a bad thing. Sure Bush did little in Afghanistan for most of his Presidency. There was little to DO in Afghanistan for most of those seven years, and by the way, relatively few troops were engaged in combat thre for most of that period. After the invasion of Iraq, Al Qaida moved its ops to Iraq, where it got chewed to little militant bits. The “militants” retreated to Afghanistan, and it is time to go kill them there.
Zumkopf on November 12, 2009 at 2:11 PM
This isn’t a case of incompetence.
This entire delay is NOT because he can’t find the answer. It’s a delaying tactic, hoping public support for the Afghan effort will drop through the floor. The White House wants to withdraw…and they’ll drive the poll numbers down to give them a fig leaf for doing so.
If you don’t believe me, think about this: how long has it been since you heard Obama say ANYTHING good about Afghanistan? We’ve heard endless whining about corruption, Karzai, Pakistan, etc. But have you heard ANY praise of our troops? October saw the highest losses to date in that conflict….did Obama address this? No. All we got was a photo op at Dover airbase…where he didn’t have to speak.
He has done nothing to keep the public supportive. Nothing.
My only hope comes from the fact that public disapproval of that conflict hasn’t come as fast as I think they anticipated. (Thus, he has to delay some more.)
jeanneb on November 12, 2009 at 2:14 PM
Bolton denies there is a New World Order! ZERO CREDIBILITY!
BobAnthony on November 12, 2009 at 2:29 PM
The reason Obama is in such a quandary is that he hasn’t figured out how to make it about HIM. The only decisions he’s ever made were to put himself in the center of attention and trying to reap some glory out of it. The ONLY thing he cares about is himself.
What are his choices? Send more troops – may work, may not, would it bring about Obama glory, not good enough odds. Pull out altogether? Would only bring him glory amoung the far-left anti-war folks and jihadist Muslims everywhere, who will have won. His third choice, the one he’s made, is to stall until something else comes along (jobs summit?) or some tragedy happens to distract everyone from his inaction.
The most incompetent, inexperienced, ignorant, corrupt president – ever.
Common Sense on November 12, 2009 at 2:57 PM
FIFY!
lovingmyUSA on November 12, 2009 at 3:36 PM
Too bad you didn’t have any facts to back up your talking points from Puff Ho…you know, as a matter of “intellectual honesty”…
What Failure in Afghanistan?
By Fareed Zakaria
Monday, October 12, 2009
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/11/AR2009101101552_pf.html
At the heart of Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s request for a major surge in troops is the assumption that we are failing in Afghanistan. But are we really? The United States has had one central objective: to deny al-Qaeda the means to reconstitute, to train and to plan major terrorist attacks. This mission has been largely successful for the past eight years.
*Al-Qaeda is dispersed, on the run and unable to direct attacks of the kind it planned and executed routinely in the 1990s.
*Fourteen of the top 20 leaders of the group have been killed by drone attacks.
*Its funding sources are drying up, and its political appeal is at an all-time low.
*All this is not an accident but rather a product of the U.S. presence in the region and efforts to disrupt terrorists, track funds, gain intelligence, aid development, help allies and kill enemies.
Of course, all this has been set back, thanks to the dithering of Osh*thead.
MEANWHILE OUR SOLDIERS ARE DEMORALIZED AND DYING…
lovingmyUSA on November 12, 2009 at 3:46 PM
Bolton Rocks!! More John, please. We hardly know ye…
highninside on November 12, 2009 at 5:53 PM
***
John Bolton sounds better and more competent every time you watch or listen to him. As far as Comrade Obama (PBUH)–he is just looking for some POLITICAL COVER for his Cut and Run trick.
***
SARAH’CUDA for POTUS, JOHN BOLTON for V.P. in 2012. An AMERICA FIRST ticket you can believe in.
***
John Bibb
***
rocketman on November 12, 2009 at 6:33 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2