Army ordered Hasan into lecture series on Islam

posted at 9:30 am on November 12, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

The Army realized that Major Nidal Hasan had reached some sort of crisis point last year, but as the Washington Post reports today, they deliberately avoided a determination of danger that would have led them to separate Hasan from the service.  Instead, they sent him to a lecture series on Islam in the hope that it might clear up Hasan’s “delusional” thinking on his religion.  None of Hasan’s fellow psychiatrists at Walter Reed thought he was dangerous, but they almost willed themselves not to ask the real questions:

Army psychiatrists at Walter Reed Army Medical Center who supervised Maj. Nidal M. Hasan’s work as a psychiatric fellow tried to turn his growing preoccupation with religion and war into something productive by ordering him to attend a university lecture series on Islam, the Middle East and terrorism, according to a Walter Reed staff member familiar with Hasan’s medical training. …

The idea that Hasan attend the lectures, which he did late last year or early this year, came up during discussions among the psychiatric staffs of the hospital and the Army’s medical university about what was perceived as Hasan’s lack of productivity and his constant interest in Muslims whose religious beliefs conflicted with their military duties.

“You’re at an institution of higher learning. He seems to want to do work in an area no one knows anything about,” the staff member, who also requested anonymity because he had not been authorized to speak publicly, said of the order. “You don’t want to close him down just because it’s different.”

During those discussions, psychiatrists commented in passing about whether Hasan could be delusional or hurt fellow soldiers, but did not think he was dangerous and never took steps to have him evaluated either for mental fitness or as a security threat. On the contrary, his demeanor was regarded as gentle and polite, and he often responded to inquiries about his well-being by saying, “I’m doing well, thank God.”

“He had his struggles, and he embraced his religion with such intensity that one wondered whether he” could have suffered from a form of “delusion,” the staffer said. He cited as an example — without speaking of Hasan in particular — the belief that the U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are against Muslims rather than against al-Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan and Saddam Hussein’s government and then insurgents in Iraq.

Contrary to his family’s statements, the Army says that Hasan never attempted to leave the service or declare himself a conscientious objector.  Had he tried to leave altogether, the Army probably would have refused the request, but they would also have been unlikely to promote him to major, as they did last May.  Even with a shortage of majors in the medical service, the Army would have looked on such a request very unfavorably to someone’s career.

Obviously the Army didn’t intend to keep a dangerous nutcase near its soldiers, but the decision-making described by the Post shows the dangers of political correctness.  The people closest to Hasan knew something was wrong with him; he repeatedly made statements about the primacy of his Muslim identity over his duty as an Army officer as well as his belief that the US was waging war on Islam.  Yet the Army was keen to show that they didn’t want to “shut him down.”  Instead, they decided in true patronizing fashion to show Hasan that they knew more about Islam than he did, a mission whose success can be judged in the events that unfolded last week.

It looks as though the Army was more interested in diversity than security.  How else would one explain the effort to keep and promote a psychiatrist whose colleagues thought him “delusional”?  Even if the delusional behavior wasn’t dangerous — and obviously it was — why would psychiatric professionals want a delusional doctor treating soldiers in a combat zone?  Do psychiatrists normally allow patients to be subjected to delusional colleagues, or does that only happen when they get intimidated by religious delusions?  And how would that lecture series have “cured” his delusional thinking?

I suspect that any other kind of “delusional” thinking would have landed Hasan into a treatment center as a patient rather than a provider.  Why didn’t that happen here?  The Army wanted to protect its diversity rather than its soldiers, even if only from a psychiatrist who needed a psychiatrist much more than a combat-zone assignment.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

What no one is realizing is that when the tyrants of the world realize how diverse and PC our military is they will just lay down their arms in recognition of our compassionate and just ways.

gwelf on November 12, 2009 at 9:33 AM

How stupid can you get.

maynila on November 12, 2009 at 9:34 AM

It looks as though the Army was more interested in diversity than security.

I’d bet that if the Army had their way, security would be a higher priority than diversity. They were just trying to avoid getting crosswise with the liberal idiots who control their purse-strings.

misterpeasea on November 12, 2009 at 9:35 AM

Excellent! They should have sent him to an explosives and bomb making course as well. Man, these guys were really thinking outside the box … no doubt they were thing about that all important diversity.

darwin on November 12, 2009 at 9:35 AM

What no one is realizing is that when the tyrants of the world realize how diverse and PC our military is they will just lay down their arms in recognition of our compassionate and just ways.

gwelf on November 12, 2009 at 9:33 AM

I once read a comment by a Swedish politician who said that Swedes should be tolerant of Muslims because then when the Muslims took over, they would be tolarant of non-Muslim Swedes. (Malmo, Sweden, by the way is pretty much under the rule of sharia, as are parts of suburban Paris and Bradford, UK.)

Wethal on November 12, 2009 at 9:37 AM

No process occurs within the military without clearance.

After 9/11/01, the Left howled incessantly regarding federal national intelligence tagging international calls to/from known Islamic terrorists.

Chris Matthews, eat your own nose. Yes, it is a fact that YOU helped to make so widely known, that it is the Department of Homeland Security, FBI and CIA designated responsibility to trace American calls to/from known Islamic terrorists, to then collectively profile the American contact and PROSECUTE as a domestic enemy of the state.

How is one an enemy of the state if no crime exists?

More to the point, Matthews initiated the furtherance of the Obama PC Doctrine. It is no longer a crime to affiliate with known Islamic terrorists, nor is it a crime to be a known Islamic terrorist, even within the US Military.

maverick muse on November 12, 2009 at 9:37 AM

Just like Chris Farley’s motivational speaker Hasan should have been “living in a van down by the river.” Preferably a river near, if not in, Gitmo.

viking01 on November 12, 2009 at 9:38 AM

How embarrasing.

bridgetown on November 12, 2009 at 9:38 AM

Anyone with half a brain knows that basic Islam makes you into a terrorist.
Examine the FOUNDER, not the liberal, modern, cultural brand of Islam. I mean, who are you kidding by saying over and over that “Islam is a religion of peace?”

maynila on November 12, 2009 at 9:38 AM

I usually try to avoid anything that could be construed as a personal attack on the bloggers here at Hotair…

…but you are really candy-coating it here, Ed.

The entire chain of command has blood on its hands. There is no other realistic way to put it. There could be scores, or even hundreds of people who failed in their duty to make the tough decisions. They should all be held accountable, but I doubt any of them will — especially under this administration.

gryphon202 on November 12, 2009 at 9:38 AM

The US Air Force recently announced it was no longer committed to purchasing the F-22 Raptor, instead opting to train pilots to battle the enemy with pleasant, flowery language about diversity.

darwin on November 12, 2009 at 9:40 AM

Imagine if we have a fundamentalist Muslim working IN a military hospital. We could have a Dr. Death or an angel of death nurse killing our troops in the very place that they’re suppose to be getting better. Time to clean house.

Mojave Mark on November 12, 2009 at 9:40 AM

Wethal on November 12, 2009 at 9:37 AM

I can only imagine how the current world ‘leaders’ would respond to Hitler invading Poland and Czechoslovakia. Neville Chamberlains all around.

gwelf on November 12, 2009 at 9:40 AM

Well the DoD really screwed the pooch so to speek with this.

Mr. Joe on November 12, 2009 at 9:41 AM

I stopped listening to M. Savage awhile ago. But, there’s one thing he’s always been right about; Liberalism is a mental disorder.

p0s3r on November 12, 2009 at 9:44 AM

Authorities Defend New “Paint By Numbers” Approach to Terrorism Investigations As “So Much More Fun” Than the Old “Connect the Dots” Method: http://optoons.blogspot.com/2009/11/authorities-defend-new-paint-by-numbers.html

Mervis Winter on November 12, 2009 at 9:45 AM

It’s a good thing we have such political correctness in our military bureaucracy – political correctness forced upon the military by liberal civilian political leadership and by politically correct politicians.

Why, reporting the red flags on this creep might have resulted in someone being offended (can you imagine that horror? I sure can’t), followed by the Democrat-supporting ACLU and CAIR teaming up to file a civil rights lawsuit against the person who would have dared to report the red flags.

I’m so glad no Muslims were offended in the run-up to the Ft. Hood shootings. That would have been inexcusable.

Good Lt on November 12, 2009 at 9:46 AM

Meanwhile back in Afghanistan, the CIC is doing what?

Bravely bold Sir Barack
Rode forth from Camelot.
He was not afraid to die,
Oh brave Sir Barack.
He was not at all afraid
To be killed in nasty ways.
Brave, brave, brave, brave Sir Barack.

He was not in the least bit scared
To be mashed into a pulp.
Or to have his eyes gouged out,
And his elbows broken.
To have his kneecaps split
And his body burned away,
And his limbs all hacked and mangled
Brave Sir Barack.

His head smashed in
And his heart cut out
And his liver removed
And his bowls unplugged
And his nostrils raped
And his bottom burnt off
And his pen–

“That’s… that’s enough music for now lads,
*** there’s dirty work afoot*** ???.”

Brave Sir Barack ran away.
(“No!”)
Bravely ran away away.
(“I didn’t!”)
When danger reared it’s ugly head,
He bravely turned his tail and fled.
(“no!”)
Yes, brave Sir Barack turned about
(“I didn’t!”)
And gallantly he chickened out.

****Bravely**** taking (“I never did!”) to his feet,
He beat a very brave retreat.
(“all lies!”)
Bravest of the braaaave, Sir Barack!
(“I never!”)

Mr. Joe on November 12, 2009 at 9:46 AM

I stopped listening to M. Savage awhile ago. But, there’s one thing he’s always been right about; Liberalism is a mental disorder.

p0s3r on November 12, 2009 at 9:44 AM

Savage is great, and mostly right!

SouthernGent on November 12, 2009 at 9:46 AM

Anyone with half a brain knows that basic Islam makes you into a terrorist.
Examine the FOUNDER, not the liberal, modern, cultural brand of Islam. I mean, who are you kidding by saying over and over that “Islam is a religion of peace?”

maynila on November 12, 2009 at 9:38 AM

That is why I have taken to calling it Mohammadism whenever I can.

1.) That is its true core – the teachings and example of the Prophet Mohammad.
2.) I refuse to accept its tenet, “Submission”, in thought, word, or deed.

By referring to Mohammadism as “Islam”, one succumbs to its main objective from the start.

I refuse.

alexwest on November 12, 2009 at 9:48 AM

I call it Perversity!

The left insists that we tolerate everything destructive to America and the human soul.
The left is intolerant of anything that interferes with their plans to destroy American and the human soul.

The Rock on November 12, 2009 at 9:49 AM

The entire chain of command has blood on its hands.

As does the civilian political leadership who forced the military to act in ways that were antithetical to its own security.

Hence, people being afraid to report the red flags for fear of prosecution. Now what kinds of politicians would have possibly made it a legal liability to report potential Islamic terrorist activity to people who could have stopped it?

Can’t imagine. Probably those damned Republicans again. They’re always trying to force mandatory multiculturalism and political correctness on everyone. Damn Bush and Cheney.

Good Lt on November 12, 2009 at 9:49 AM

gryphon202 on November 12, 2009 at 9:38 AM

If Bush couldn’t can the head of the FBI after 9-11, what makes you think this this mope will ensure any of these dopes are canned?

They were following policy!

alexwest on November 12, 2009 at 9:50 AM

OK, here’s our military thinking these days.

Sure we could blow everyone away and MAKE them do what we tell them to do, but why would we want to use our military to actually WIN a war?

Instead of fighting, we should figure out why they don’t like us and make them like us. I’ve got an idea. . . let’s all become Muslim and implement Sharia law. If we did that, they’d stop fighting and we’d ‘win’.

I have lost all faith in the ability of the federal government to protect me from international enemies. It’s getting time to stop paying taxes to fund this circus.

ThackerAgency on November 12, 2009 at 9:50 AM

Platoon leader to HQ: Colonel, my Tibetan private was just shot! That destroys my perfect diversity and now I can’t attack the enemy position!

HQ: Hang tight Lt, we’ll grant you a waiver to AR 33-9 “Diversity on the battelfield” and substitute a southern Chilean. Your diversity will be back into specs.

Wait! Wait! I just received a memo stating that your ammo was not made by a minority owned company. I repeat … your ammo was not made by a minority owned company. Do not fire … hold your fire.

darwin on November 12, 2009 at 9:51 AM

Instead, they decided in true patronizing fashion to show Hasan that they knew more about Islam than he did, a mission whose success can be judged in the events that unfolded last week.–Ed

Patronizing PC, yes. However, the Military Brass were not attempting “to show Hasan that they knew more about Islam than he did”. Rather, the Military were blinded by the PC light, hindered by the rose colored nation building Bush Progressive Doctrine that itself was blind to its own faults. Scrambling to stay abreast with the day, our Military was blinded by the imposed ideology that promotes the irresistible and brilliant glory of “Democracy”, as if it is the US Military job to nation build, not so much for the US, but for the UN, given the Commander in Chief PC agenda to obey.

What a shame that the Ivy League terminated the creative production of true genius with absolute scholarly historical awareness in order to mass produce PC progressives. And yes, Bush was a PC tool worked by the same global governance puppet masters that pull Obama’s strings today.

maverick muse on November 12, 2009 at 9:54 AM

CAIR has done its sensitization work well. Same tactics as Sharpton and Jackson. I see the Navy also has some problems along this same line. Malkin has a piece on it. The Army won’t protect its soldiers,..however it does put on a nice memorial service.

a capella on November 12, 2009 at 9:56 AM

US Public: General, sir? You certainly appear to have your thumb up your ass.

US General: Yes, I know, but it is a diverse thumb!

alexwest on November 12, 2009 at 9:57 AM

OT

Hoffman gaining in NY-23.

artist on November 12, 2009 at 9:59 AM

I’d bet that if the Army had their way, security would be a higher priority than diversity. They were just trying to avoid getting crosswise with the liberal idiots who control their purse-strings.
misterpeasea on November 12, 2009 at 9:35 AM

Army brass is political and has always been political. Even during the Bush years, there was a great fear all over the country of “persecuting” Muslims. Even Bush himself took great pains in the days following 9/11 to emphasize that fact.

It’s tough. On one hand, we do have freedom of religion, so we have to be careful about creating a “witch hunt” that unfairly targets all Muslims for the actions of some. On the other hand, jihadists are extensively trained in how to use our respect for civil liberties against us. At some point, as Glenn Beck says, you have to speak without fear and question with boldness. If not, the consequences can be catastrophic.

Outlander on November 12, 2009 at 10:00 AM

I will bet my next paycheck there will be a DOD wide EEO/diversity stand down or mandatory training stemming from this crap.

Johnnyreb on November 12, 2009 at 10:00 AM

When Vietnam war protesters can openly meet with the enemy, and still serve in government, when elected officials can openly, public meet with enemies of the United States and subvert US public policy, it is only a matter of time before enemies of the US will have infiltrated every part of the US government.

All because government officials who are loyal to the United States and its constitution are afraid of being labeled another Joe McCarthy.

The liberal left has been so effective at discrediting anti-communists that just bring the subject up for debate is enough to get you labeled a right wing extremist crank.

Skandia Recluse on November 12, 2009 at 10:02 AM

If Nidal really didn’t want to be in the Army, all he had to do was go the birther route and claim that Pres. Obama lacked the authority to send him to Afghanistan because Obama wasn’t the legitimate president of the US.

suburbanite on November 12, 2009 at 10:03 AM

Leadership of troops is the greatest responsibility of a military officer…No, Hasan was not a commander but he was a Major in the United States Army and by default he was in a leadership position. Tragically, we discover that he was not only not qualified to wear the rank of an Army Officer, he was ulitmately a mortal threat to our soldiers. It seems that in this case Hasan’s superiors failed to act in a way to protect our most valuable asset in the military, our troops. Hopefully, the Army will prosecute the incompetent bastards who enabled this tragedy. Political correctness, multi-culturalism, and cowardly leadership must be ripped out by the roots and exterminated…We owe this duty to our soldiers, sailors, airman and Marines.

Nozzle on November 12, 2009 at 10:04 AM

Liberalism is a mental disorder.
p0s3r on November 12, 2009 at 9:44 AM
——————————————-
And the reason why it is a mental disorder is because liberals have been brainwashed.

Liberals are weak-minded and can easily be brainwashed by the propaganda through the schools, the media, the “social causes” etc.

ms on November 12, 2009 at 10:05 AM

Polictical Correctness;the cancer of our society ,planted and nourished by Marxist-Leninists who have infiltrated every facet of American society.

America is at a crossroads.

Sandybourne on November 12, 2009 at 10:08 AM

Reading this, I wonder if some of the problem was caused by psychology’s discomfort with religion. The discipline has always skirted nervously around the perception and cognition of religious individuals, occasionally labeling them as “delusions.”

If the Hasan’s fellow psychiatrists decided to put his Muslim delusions in the same category that they file Baptist “delusions” or Pentecostal “delusions,” that may explain their willful blindness. If you feel that you cannot legally or ethically distinguish between religions, and you think all religious people are a little crazy, maybe that creates a situation that allows individuals like Hasan to be ignored.

blueguitarbob on November 12, 2009 at 10:08 AM

Sun Tzu said “If you know your enemy and know yourself, your victory will not stand in doubt.”

Our Muslim enemy knows that the Achilles Heel of America is PC as formulated by the media (”NY Times’ ‘MSNBC’ ‘CNN’ ‘ad infinitum’ and our government (President, Congress, Supreme Court) and now, alas, our own military.

Based on this knowledge they can commit any atrocity they desire and merely scream RACIST when we attempt to retaliate to freeze us into self-doubt and inaction.

Our Muslim enemy not only hates us but openly laughs at us for our stupidity. We have a President (Obama) and and Commanding General (Casey) not only sucking up to them
but threatening our own soldiers with imprisonment if they defend themselves.

You can imagine the incredulity of Muslims when America selects a fully radicalized ‘Manchurian Candidate’ zombie (Hasan) (who was brainwashed in the very shadow of the nation’s capital yet) to disseminate propaganda. We have never sunk so low. Shame on the President and the Army.

MaiDee on November 12, 2009 at 10:09 AM

I can only imagine how the current world ‘leaders’ would respond to Hitler invading Poland and Czechoslovakia. Neville Chamberlains all around.

gwelf on November 12, 2009 at 9:40 AM

Thankfully, the UN was created to prevent something like that from happening again. Today, the UN security council would send him a strongly worded memo. Hitler, upon viewing the memo, would have fled Poland with his tail between his legs, and all would be well in the world.

Joe Caps on November 12, 2009 at 10:10 AM

Political correctness, in this instance, aided and abetted the killing of 14 of our fellow human beings (including an unborn baby).

But every day, across the breadth of our culture — in our schools, businessess, organizations, governments, everywhere — this inane concept robs millions of us of our rights and privileges.

This senseless mind-f*ck needs to be rooted out, period, and no better place to start than in our military and police departments.

TXUS on November 12, 2009 at 10:13 AM

It looks as though the Army was more interested in diversity than security.

Why is that a surprise? How many times in the past few years have we seen statements by top military officials about how “diversity” is their number one goal? Not excellence, not achievement, not the mission of their branch of service — just having “diversity.” It’s pathetic. They’re perfectly happy to welcome incompetents and even, in the case of some Muslims like Hasan, murderous lunatics into their ranks, as long as they come in lots of different colors and ethnic backgrounds.

AZCoyote on November 12, 2009 at 10:17 AM

I stopped listening to M. Savage awhile ago. But, there’s one thing he’s always been right about; Liberalism is a mental disorder.

p0s3r on November 12, 2009 at 9:44 AM

Savage is great, and mostly right!

SouthernGent on November 12, 2009 at 9:46 AM

Dr. Savage is a creative genius. His contrarian nature leaves him beholden to no one, no lobby or party. He exudes the rare commodity of honesty with all its pain and glory. Having “been there, done that”, Savage amalgamated his innate insight, his youthful idealism, and his mature wisdom, and is our contemporary American biblical Jewish prophet in the wilderness preaching “Repent and Be Saved”: BORDERS, LANGUAGE, AND CULTURE.

To those who hate Savage’s realism, you hate looking in the mirror, and attack Savage rather than admit or overcome your own faults. No one is forced to listen when he gets on nerves. But you should think about what he had to say, and remember that he has very acute perceptive and cognitive gifts that of themselves are rare enough.

That Savage actually exhibits the balls to share what he knows is why the Marxists would annihilate his voice. That Savage indulges his painful contrarian whims explains the persona non grata designation assigned by his colleagues like a noose around his neck. No one’s perfect; and unlike other egos involved, Savage publicly admits his faults. Have the painted ladies on Fox?

maverick muse on November 12, 2009 at 10:19 AM

The Army realized that Major Nidal Hasan the bull had reached some sort of crisis point last year, but as the Washington Post reports today, they deliberately avoided a determination of danger that would have led them to separate Hasan the bull from the service. Instead, they sent him to a lecture series on Islam stuffed a red flag in his face in the hope that it might clear up Hasan’s “delusional” thinking on his religion the bull’s snorting and foot-pawing.

And these are psychiatrists??? God help us all. What twisted thinking we have fallen into. I hope to God we’ll be able to crawl out of this mess.

marge on November 12, 2009 at 10:21 AM

Hasan wasn’t the “delusional one.” The “delusional ones” were the people who came into contact with Hasan, knew something wasn’t right with him and continued with business as usual.

moonsbreath on November 12, 2009 at 10:28 AM

The root of all PC and race baiting is the victim being offended. If we really want to get rid of the PC and race baiting we must teach the people of America that being “offended” is a voluntary action. We choose to be offended and allow what others say to determine our emotional state of mind. Whining ourselves will not change anything, we, here at Hot Air, must set the example. If you really believe in freedom for all repeat after me:

I refuse to be controlled. What others say will not determine my state of mind. Spit what vile filth you choose, I will not validate it by being offended.

Choose_Freedom on November 12, 2009 at 10:45 AM

Obviously the Army didn’t intend to keep a dangerous nutcase terrorist near its soldiers

Johan Klaus on November 12, 2009 at 10:49 AM

Ed, it seems you’re arguing that to be a devout jihadist muslim is to be delusional. Why not just call it what it is? It’s evil.

Part of our P.C. weakness is our tendency to characterize evil as insanity. That’s a mistake. People are fully capable of choosing evil. Hasan ignored his internal moral compass and decided to subscribe to the jihadist worldview, and he chose to follow it to its logical conclusion by attacking unarmed “infidels.” He is morally culpable for his evil decisions and actions.

Don’t grant him the victim status he craves.

OhioCoastie on November 12, 2009 at 11:04 AM

Instead, they sent him to a lecture series on Islam in the hope that it might clear up Hasan’s “delusional” thinking on his religion.

Oh that really makes so much sense. If someone is an alcoholic just send them to a wine festival. Yup, that will cure them.

MB4 on November 12, 2009 at 11:12 AM

“Army ordered Hasan into lecture series on Islam”

Isn’t that akin to giving a pyromaniac gasoline and matches?

GFW on November 12, 2009 at 11:18 AM

Major Traitor Hasan could not be a problem, according to the military authorities, because everyone in American has been told, and told, and told again that “ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE“.

His behavior could not be judged according to his religious views, because it was pre-deemed “inappropriate” to judge him according to his religious views.

The Great God of P.C. must be serviced.

Carved onto its belly, however, is the phrase:

P.C.- fatal when swallowed.

(Unfortunately, it’s in Arabic.)

profitsbeard on November 12, 2009 at 11:21 AM

A strong belief in God and being against wars is not being delusional. If the MSM is going to create a new psychosis, they should go to medical school first. This guy bleeds jihadism.

Kissmygrits on November 12, 2009 at 11:21 AM

I suspect that any other kind of “delusional” thinking would have landed Hasan into a treatment center as a patient rather than a provider. Why didn’t that happen here? The Army wanted to protect its diversity rather than its soldiers, even if only from a psychiatrist who needed a psychiatrist much more than a combat-zone assignment.

Ed; consider the source. I have worked with many military physicians and they are motivated, dedicated and talented individuals. However, there are outliers who strain at the leash of uniformity and do not embrace the military culture, and/or, in this case, American culture per se. The AMEDD does not purge low-performing physicians. Everyone has a role and is expected to perform–that is what the senior rating and rating systems are all about–getting officers straightened out and performing well.

In the case of MAJ Hasan, the rater and senior rater have both failed the Army. First, if the signs were recognized and the only corrective action was to send this guy on, wait for it, Muslim realitions…then WTFO? Was there any warning, “Hey watch this guy” sent by his rating chain to Ft. Hood? Likely not. In the military, people say, a) he’s an officer and b) he’s a doctor—so they’re expected to have some degree of academic and clinical aloofness, as well as a general lack of military bearing–it’s the norm. Moreover, the same raters that failed to do anything about it were Walter Reed colonel types who probably demonstrate the same lack of bearing that he does—its incestuous.

MAJ Hasan, at his rank and position, had attended only ONE officer development course–Officer Basic Course at Fort Sam Houston TX. May be 6-10 weeks of coffee drinking, powerpoint watching and nurse squeezing antics interspersed with a pushup or two and maybe a run around the track ‘fore the sun comes up. Physicians do not attend the Captain’s career course (a source of military correction and training). So, this guy goes to med school to figure out the sticky side of a band aid goes on the skin, then residency where he learns to throw away the wrapper, cashes a paycheck on the 1st and the 15th and, in the interim, fails to lay down his Islamofascist ideology. A failure that was spotted by his raters and senior raters, who should’ve acted upon his issues.

ted c on November 12, 2009 at 11:25 AM

Platoon leader to HQ: Colonel, my Tibetan private was just shot! That destroys my perfect diversity and now I can’t attack the enemy position!

HQ: Hang tight Lt, we’ll grant you a waiver to AR 33-9 “Diversity on the battelfield” and substitute a southern Chilean. Your diversity will be back into specs.

Wait! Wait! I just received a memo stating that your ammo was not made by a minority owned company. I repeat … your ammo was not made by a minority owned company. Do not fire … hold your fire.

darwin on November 12, 2009 at 9:51 AM

A tragic LOL.

(This LOL was approved by SEIU and ACORN as meeting their low carbon footprint mandate and minority set-aside rules, and was made by all organic labor.)

profitsbeard on November 12, 2009 at 11:28 AM

The Army wanted to protect its diversity rather than its soldiers, even if only from a psychiatrist who needed a psychiatrist much more than a combat-zone assignment.

And this is pretty much the same “mind set” that McChrystal, Obama’s hand-picked general, has had in Afghanistan.

We don’t win by destroying the Taliban. We don’t win by body count. We don’t win by the number of successful military raids or attacks, we win when the people [Afghan muslims] decide we win.
- General McChrystal (in London some time ago)

Pre-occupied with protection of our own forces, we have operated in a manner that distances us — physically and psychologically — from the people [muslims] we seek to protect [serve].
- General McChrystal (from his COMISAF assessment of the war in Afghanistan)

Madness, utter madness.

MB4 on November 12, 2009 at 11:28 AM

profitsbeard on November 12, 2009 at 11:21 AM

I’m really angry at reports that he was shouting “Allahu Akbar” which, they say, “means” God is great.
Allah is NOT every body elses’ God, you morons. Certainly not the God of the Christians.

maynila on November 12, 2009 at 11:28 AM

Ann Coulter, as only she can, skewers the media and the military brass…

Far less offensive speech has been grounds for discipline or even removal from duties in the military. In the aftermath of the Tailhook scandal, for example, two Navy officers were reprimanded and reassigned after putting up a sign with the words of a nursery rhyme altered to include a vulgar sexual reference to liberal congresswoman Patricia Schroeder.

But a Muslim Army doctor can go around a military installation somberly advocating the beheading of infidels, and the girls running the military treat him like he’s Nicole Kidman and they’re press junket reporters.

The Army’s top brass, Gen. George Casey, responded to the military’s shocking decision to keep a terrorist-sympathizing Muslim in the Army by announcing: “Our diversity … is a strength.” And I thought gays couldn’t openly serve in the military

SouthernGent on November 12, 2009 at 11:29 AM

Walter Reed Scandal Unfolds with General’s Firingby Guy Raz
“It’s extremely troubling that senior officials at Walter Reed now, and in the past, appear to have known about the poor treatment, the lack of support [and] the substandard living conditions,” Clinton said. “And that bothers me greatly.”

Defense Secretary Robert Gates has already appointed an eight-member team to review procedures at Walter Reed. The committee will release its findings within 45 days.

But that report will not be released before the Senate Armed Services Committee holds its own investigation, scheduled for next week.

“We want to know who knew what, when and how could this have happened,” Clinton said.

According to top Pentagon officials following this story, it’s not over yet.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7681867

The story referenced above involved “substandard living conditions” and led to the firing of the commander and the early retirement of the surgeon general.

Hence, if peeling paint, moldy carpet and long wait lines at Walter Reed resulted in the firing of the commander, what would the promotion and failure to act upon a physician’s fundamentalist ideology that ended up harming his patients result in?

ted c on November 12, 2009 at 11:36 AM

The Army’s top brass, Gen. George Casey, responded to the military’s shocking decision to keep a terrorist-sympathizing Muslim in the Army by announcing: “Our diversity … is a strength.”

And I thought gays couldn’t openly serve in the military.

SouthernGent on November 12, 2009 at 11:29 AM

Don’t be surprised if Hasan claim to be gay, next.

Just to uber-f*ck with the military’s P.C. mindset.

profitsbeard on November 12, 2009 at 11:36 AM

And I thought gays couldn’t openly serve in the military

SouthernGent on November 12, 2009 at 11:29 AM

You don’t have to be straight to serve in the military, you just have to be able to shoot straight.
- Barry Goldwater

The muslim Major was on a shooting rampage yelling “Allahu Akbar!, Allahu Ahkbar!”. How many gay Majors go on shooting rampages yelling, “Barney Frank!, Barney Frank!”?

MB4 on November 12, 2009 at 11:41 AM

My minority opinion of one is that the emphasis on diversity, which leads to unqualified people getting very public jobs and failing, produces a backlash which subsequently reduces diversity. Hasan’s backlash should occur in a couple years. Obama’s will take eight or ten years.

burt on November 12, 2009 at 11:56 AM

We don’t win by destroying the Taliban NAZI’s. We don’t win by body count. We don’t win by the number of successful military raids or attacks, we win when the [Afghan muslims] German and Japanese people decide we win.
- General McChrystal (in London some time ago)

Johan Klaus on November 12, 2009 at 12:00 PM

The muslim Major was on a shooting rampage yelling “Allahu Akbar!, Allahu Ahkbar!”. How many gay Majors go on shooting rampages yelling, “Barney Frank!, Barney Frank!”?

MB4 on November 12, 2009 at 11:41 AM

++

Johan Klaus on November 12, 2009 at 12:02 PM

Isn’t the Army in a no-win situation here? Either they do what they did, i.e. play the politically correct willful-blindness game, or they move proactively to involuntarily separate this scumbag and deal with the tsunami of bad publicity from the MSM about “profiling”, lawsuits from CAIR-type groups (e.g. the “flying imams” suit) and public hearings held by vicious buffoons like Dick Durbin, Conyers and Keith Ellison.

As the moral and cultural rot of this country’s political and cultural elite advances, it routinely distorts and politicizes decision-making in all sorts of institutions; the military isn’t the first such casualty of political correctness (pun intended), and with the glorious age of Hope and Change upon us, won’t be the last. Disgusting.

Travis Bickle on November 12, 2009 at 12:03 PM

It looks as though the Army was more interested in diversity than security.

Kind of like why we have the POTUS that we have.

Again, we NEED to have anti-political correctness rallies. We need people to realise that the PC-nazis are the reason why race relations are going downhill, why our security is at stake, and why our country is going down the tubes.

One thing that we can all do for a start is no longer using the term (insert nationality)-American. Instead, say black, hispanic, asian, etc.

DethMetalCookieMonst on November 12, 2009 at 12:20 PM

PC logic at work. “Let’s send Hasan to a lecture series on islam to show him it’s really the ROP”.

Fletch54 on November 12, 2009 at 12:37 PM

Reading this, I wonder if some of the problem was caused by psychology’s discomfort with religion. The discipline has always skirted nervously around the perception and cognition of religious individuals, occasionally labeling them as “delusions.”

Absolutely. Plus, the unreasonable attitude that a “doctor” couldn’t possibly flip out that badly.

AnninCA on November 12, 2009 at 12:52 PM

My desire is that this incident not result in the logical backlash against–not Muslims–but against anyone in the military who occasionally loses their temper in controlled manner (think H. Norman Schwazkopf) but is otherwise fine and now is going to see an increased use of pre-emptive psychological counseling. People have a right to get angry at things, and to even show they are angry, within certain limits.

Now, with this incident, I hope that the brass is not going to just start making everyone act like a prim and proper 14-year old girl, because they don’t want to admit the real problem–a man believed in a certain strain of his religion and followed it to its natural conclusion. Period.

We can have the argument over whether or not excessive belief marks one as irrational–one can have just as excessive a belief in something as global warming as Islam or Christianity–but that may be psychobabble hiding what I believe really happened here–an all-too-human predilection to believe so strongly in a cause that one allows one’s opponents to become dehumanized, mere things to be removed from the field of battle. After that anything is possible. That, in my view, is what happened to Hasan, not some secondary-PTSD.

Oh, he might have got upset from his counseling sessions with soldiers–but not from empathy, but from rage about hearing stories of his fellow Muslims being killed, and him unable to do anything. That is not secondary PTSD, that is a fellow believer finally deciding where he stands on the great issue of the day as he saw it, and acting upon it.

And from that, the military and nation are going to retaliate against the wrong people.

Horatius on November 12, 2009 at 1:06 PM

Basically, we’re through.

leftnomore on November 12, 2009 at 10:12 PM

I comment on this at my site. The problem here is Hasan tried to warn his colleagues, they just didn’t listen. And they still aren’t.

http://truthandcommonsense.com/2009/11/13/hasan-tried-to-explain-it-to-his-colleagues-that-jihadists-werent-crazy-they-thought-he-was-nuts-his-point-exactly/

archer52 on November 12, 2009 at 11:18 PM