Video: Gunning down civilians in “Call of Duty 4″
posted at 6:36 pm on November 11, 2009 by Allahpundit
Interest in the game generally and this sequence in particular is sky high so here’s some free publicity. I’d read about it and shrugged it off, but now having seen it, I’m shocked at how disturbing it is. Maybe that’s a reaction to the proximity of Fort Hood, maybe it’s the amazing realism of the scene, or maybe it’s the first-person perspective, but somehow this is way more unnerving than it would be in a movie. Minor mitigating factor: The shooters are, indeed, presented as very bad guys.
Russia is where the already-controversial “No Russian” scene goes down. As Army Ranger Pvt. Allen, players go undercover with Vladimir Makarov — an underling of the villain from “Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare.”
Along with Makarov and other terrorists, the player finds themselves in the midst of a terrible situation. The fully armed Makarov and crew waltz into a Russian airport and open fire on civilians standing in a security line.
As Allen, the player can take part in the bloodshed or simply walk alongside the cold-blooded killers as they execute hundreds of innocents.
Reminds me of the original “Scarface,” which was presented (of course) as an indictment of gangsterism yet adored by audiences for the shoot-’em-up thrill of it all. What could go wrong?
Exit question: Anyone know what the game’s backstory is for Makarov’s homicidal rage? It’s not PTSD, is it? Content warning.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
I am glad the reset button has taken Russian thugs off the list, yet.
rob verdi on November 11, 2009 at 6:39 PM
Its not COD 4, its COD: Modern Warfare 2. Just saying
bucsox79 on November 11, 2009 at 6:39 PM
It’s a video game, not real. I’m not much of a gamer, but from what I’ve seen of this game, it looks like a lot of fun.
paultevis on November 11, 2009 at 6:40 PM
Not cool.
RedNewEnglander on November 11, 2009 at 6:41 PM
Disgusting.
amerpundit on November 11, 2009 at 6:42 PM
I’ve been paying attention to this game for a long while now. As far as I know, Makarov is a member of the fictional “Ultranationalist” Russian faction in their fictional civil war.
The people who made the first game, and this one, don’t hesitate to push any buttons. The last game involved a war in the Middle East specifically intended to parallel our current ventures, and a nuke going off…near your character. The next level is simply you crawling around for thirty seconds or so until you die.
The Modern Warfare series isn’t for the weak of heart.
Black Yoshi on November 11, 2009 at 6:42 PM
Is it me or does youtube streaming just suck these days?
lorien1973 on November 11, 2009 at 6:43 PM
What is the next level, Beslan?
Brian1972 on November 11, 2009 at 6:45 PM
The original COD4: Modern Warfare had a a major twist halfway through the game that resulted in another very disturbing, yet very realistic possibility that we could face in wartime. These games have been nothing if not intense, breathtaking storytellers.
MadisonConservative on November 11, 2009 at 6:45 PM
just picked it up! i’ll wait to see the scene when i play it myself…
Joe Caps on November 11, 2009 at 6:46 PM
Uh….
Bishop on November 11, 2009 at 6:47 PM
And THIS is why I hate First Person Shooters.
Well, that, and they make me nauseous.. :)
Give me a good point and click adventure game or puzzle game any day to this sort of over-the-top nonsense.
Silly violence is better. (See Whiplash.)
tickleddragon on November 11, 2009 at 6:48 PM
This won’t stop me from buying it, playing it, and loving every second.
V15J on November 11, 2009 at 6:48 PM
Ditto, not cool.
I’m not anti-video game or anything and I know that game’s been in the market a while but maybe we should, I dunno, temper some of these things out of decency and respect.
Sure don’t want censorship at all, but I wish the people making them would take a little into consideration when they’re developing them.
JoeinTX on November 11, 2009 at 6:48 PM
Don’t read the CNN link unless you want plot/spoilers for this scene, BTW. I think this is powerful in a way that film never could be.
DaveS on November 11, 2009 at 6:49 PM
Youtube comments says the game warns you about the level and you can choose to skip it.
lorien1973 on November 11, 2009 at 6:49 PM
And you can just walk along and not shoot. And it’s a video game.
If I were a parent I wouldn’t let me kid play, but I don’t generally see the problem with adults playing graphic games.
BadgerHawk on November 11, 2009 at 6:51 PM
Well, pointless of me avoiding a spoiler, I see. :P
MadisonConservative on November 11, 2009 at 6:52 PM
My kid bought the game at midnight; completed the entire game in hard mode in 7 hours, then went back to getting his college work done. Great to see college tuition going to add to his efficiency.
He says the game gives you the option to bypass that level; even they recognize it may be too much for some. Compared to the Grand Theft Auto requirement for thuggish behavior, this is insignificant.
Games and movies are different from real life; if kids can’t figure that out, that speaks to their lack of parenting more than anything else.
michaelo on November 11, 2009 at 6:53 PM
Agreed. 20 years ago, video games were for kids. The kids have grown up, and they still like video games. Responsible parents should be able to tell the difference, and turn if off if they don’t like what they’re seeing.
MadisonConservative on November 11, 2009 at 6:53 PM
You could probably shoot your fellow terrorists too, but I don’t think you’d advance through the level that way.
Free Constitution on November 11, 2009 at 6:54 PM
It’s a game..get over it.
EnochCain on November 11, 2009 at 6:54 PM
The COD series always tries to evoke some emotional reaction from the player. As stated, the game presents the terrorists as very bad guys. Because of the emotional reaction most people have to the airport mission, they want to play the rest of the game so they can bring the terrorists to justice. It is the same thing as a movie showing a bad guy doing a very bad thing, and the audience rooting for the hero to catch him. Different medium, same strategy.
TylerMillage on November 11, 2009 at 6:54 PM
Cripes! Gotta be the most realistic I’ve seen yet.
But heck, GTA has ya able to kill all the civilians you want. And they’ve been doing it for years. Granted, not at this level of realism.
JetBoy on November 11, 2009 at 6:54 PM
So….I’m sure this will be the hottest selling game amongst the Al Queda sect.
Game night in the Mosques.
portlandon on November 11, 2009 at 6:55 PM
The game title is Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, btw.
Enoxo on November 11, 2009 at 6:55 PM
I played this last night.
I had the same gut-wrenched reaction when I saw it in video form, but I did figure that there was good narative meaning behind it given the end of the clip.
Having actually played it last night, I can give you a few pieces of information:
1. The game very explicitely and very early allows you to opt-out of some disturbing scenes, clearly this one in mind, with no consequence if you skip them.
2. The story behind the scene is set up along the lines “you’ll lose a piece of yourself taking this mission and you will hurt people. any thing you do can’t compare to the what the world would lose if you don’t succeed”.
3. I went through the entire mission without firing at a single person (until the police showed up) without penalty.
4. This fits in very well with the story.
askheaves on November 11, 2009 at 6:55 PM
The people who don’t like this one would love the Postal games.
EnochCain on November 11, 2009 at 6:55 PM
I like first person shooter games. That however, was too much for me and I certainly wouldn’t let my kid play it while he lived under my roof. I don’t care how old he is.
boomer on November 11, 2009 at 6:56 PM
People will only be upset if there are boobies.
lorien1973 on November 11, 2009 at 6:56 PM
Well for me its only if there are not any.
EnochCain on November 11, 2009 at 6:57 PM
It’s actually the sixth game in the Call of Duty series, but a sequel to CoD4, which was the first Modern Warfare.
CNN is a moron.
Enoxo on November 11, 2009 at 6:57 PM
Just because you can create a sickening game, doesn’t mean you should.
Although this is just a game, it is disgusting. But still, it is a game. A disgusting sick game, but a game.
In a free nation, a free people can choose to make and do disgusting things. That’s just the way it is. I’d rather live in a free nation where games like this were free to be made, bought and sold,, than to live in a nation where games like this were outlawed, but the government was free to drag you out of you home and throw you before a real life firing squad anytime they chose.
It’s unfortunate they felt the need to portray something like this. I wish they would have resisted the urge. They knew there would be a market and they fed the market. They knew it would attract attention and that is what it did.
All they really do be crossing lines like this is to give ammo(for lack of a better word-sorry) to those who want to regulate free speech.
JellyToast on November 11, 2009 at 6:58 PM
Not very realistic to me. Never had one of these games, dont care if people buy it. It is no excuse for anyones actions in the future.
WoosterOh on November 11, 2009 at 6:58 PM
What happens if you shoot the terrorists before they open fire? You lose?
JohnTant on November 11, 2009 at 6:58 PM
Would people have the same reaction if it were a movie?
EnochCain on November 11, 2009 at 6:59 PM
And what would that look like? Please compare and contrast “censorship” to taking “a little [decency and respect] into consideration”
Just as an aside, what if I said:
“I’m not saying Schindler’s List should be censored, but I wish Spielberg had taken a little decency and respect into consideration.”
apollyonbob on November 11, 2009 at 6:59 PM
Oh, the visual.
nickj116 on November 11, 2009 at 6:59 PM
I find it funny that people are getting their panties in a twist over a game when people in this same society kept sites like Ogrish in business.
EnochCain on November 11, 2009 at 7:00 PM
Thanks for the Revue.
I have played Call of Duty series (the World war II versions) and had no problem killing Nazi’s & the Emporers minions, but they did not allow you kill civilians.
I don’t want children playing it, but Adults should be able too (not with children present).
portlandon on November 11, 2009 at 7:01 PM
Without going into too much detail. Makarov was the #2 man of a Russian ultranationalist from game 1. In this game he’s pretty much about gaining as much power as possible. And I played this scene. It is disturbing and it is supposed to be for good reason. It shows bad guys to actually be bad. Evil exists and Infinity Ward is willing to show it.
chicagojedi on November 11, 2009 at 7:02 PM
Just put the game in for the first time. Before accessing the game you get this prompt:
Joe Caps on November 11, 2009 at 7:03 PM
Besides being able to skip the level, and you not required to actually shoot people in the mission, the game is rated M by ESRB’s standards.
Society has this instinct to assume all video games are for young kids. Sorry, no… the average age demographic of gamers is around 30.
Enoxo on November 11, 2009 at 7:03 PM
My 16yr old son got the game yesterday and he tells me in that scene you are an undercover agent who has infiltrated that group and must participate. When you first load the game however, it warns you about it and gives you the option of skipping that section of the story.
He didn’t and finished the single player without turning into a maniac. Like most kids, he’s more interested in playing the game online with his friends.
He was more disturbed by a real terrorist douchebag shooting up an army base. He and his older brother are both Jr.ROTC and have friends in the service.
RadClown on November 11, 2009 at 7:04 PM
I find it disturbing, but I’d still play it. If I had the time.
iamse7en on November 11, 2009 at 7:04 PM
After the first prompt, you get a second:
Joe Caps on November 11, 2009 at 7:05 PM
So…the “good guy option of this level is to allow a massacre? I know it’s “just a game” but doesn’t it say something about our society that we don’t make games with choices for heroic actions anymore? Call me old fashioned by I like my Baldur’s Gate 2and i like my characters at least chaotic good.
And a game where you play through a Mumbai style massacre is just disgusting.
Rob Taylor on November 11, 2009 at 7:05 PM
No option for breaking cover and gunning down the terrorists instead?
Count to 10 on November 11, 2009 at 7:06 PM
a lot of the Obots hated HRC in particular for her work with Brownback getting games like this one RATED
ginaswo on November 11, 2009 at 7:06 PM
Super Mario Brothers didn’t make me want to dress up as a plumber and jump on turtles.
Speedwagon82 on November 11, 2009 at 7:07 PM
I am disgusted and offended — and I want this for Christmas!
John the Libertarian on November 11, 2009 at 7:07 PM
Liar.
EnochCain on November 11, 2009 at 7:08 PM
Of what I know about the specific mission, the character is trying to go deep undercover with a terrorist group in order to stop something far more heinous. However, in order to get into the group, he has to prove himself with this act.
The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one–if I was Spock.
Enoxo on November 11, 2009 at 7:08 PM
+1
John the Libertarian on November 11, 2009 at 7:08 PM
I have a great way to solve the problem with the people offended by this game…don’t buy it!
EnochCain on November 11, 2009 at 7:09 PM
Pac-Man didn’t make me want to run around dark rooms with flashing lights listening to techno music and ingesting small circular objects.
Oh, wait…
MadisonConservative on November 11, 2009 at 7:11 PM
I would say don’t bother unless you live for multi-player. The campaign mode, even beyond that trash airport level, is the worst of the entire COD series.
Bar none.
Actually, no it does not. What it tells you is that there is some disturbing content, not over the top utterly stupid content.
Jim708 on November 11, 2009 at 7:11 PM
The choice to participate is yours…it’s a reflection on the player, not the game.
MadisonConservative on November 11, 2009 at 7:12 PM
Well, if I could save the World by infiltrating this group, and I had to gun down civilians, I would do it, if it led to me making the World a better place because in the end, we would be able to get the group I have infiltrated.
I may even go along with my execution for being part of the massacre.
I would infiltrate AQ, and if some bad things happened in my presence, so be it, if it helped to get them in the end.
And out society is not like it was 20 years ago. That should go without having to be said.
WoosterOh on November 11, 2009 at 7:12 PM
WARNING: SPOILER ALERT BELOW
Also worth noting is that the terrorists execute you at the end of the mission. They knew you were trying to infiltrate their group. They make it look as if Americans are responsible for the massacre. The mission is called “No Russian” because the terrorists don’t speak Russian in the airport so as to not reveal their nationality. You spend the rest of the game as other characters hunting down Makarov, who is portrayed as evil the entire time. If anything, this game just more clearly illustrates what pure evil is.
TylerMillage on November 11, 2009 at 7:13 PM
The depth of the tragedy you witness in this video is horrifying, but in context of the plot in the story of the game it\’s unfortunately essential. Without giving it all away, the airport massacre leads to a bigger military confrontation that would never happen without it. It immerses the player in the emotion of the story within the game, which is what good games are trying to do: full immersion.I\’m surprised more people aren\’t more freaked out by the scenes from the Capitol. That stuff was pretty harsh.
Tman on November 11, 2009 at 7:17 PM
It’s just a matter of time before someone makes a game like this where the targets are politicians and the setting is Washington DC. The politicians will ban it in a heartbeat, especially if there is any favoratism toward one political ideology over the other in the scoring. Every politician in the party which is least targeted in the game will have to vote to ban the game or they will be seen as supporting violence against the other political party.
Buddahpundit on November 11, 2009 at 7:18 PM
Unfortunately there are parents that don’t read warning labels on these games and let their 10yr olds play them.
aikidoka on November 11, 2009 at 7:18 PM
Joe the Plumber disagrees.
(Obama = post turtle)
lorien1973 on November 11, 2009 at 7:20 PM
The second half of the campaign is in DC, in a war torn capitol where the Capitol building is decimated, along with the White House too. You get the impression that many of them didn’t make it.
Tman on November 11, 2009 at 7:20 PM
Come on guys I have not played this yet so lets not give any spoilers away!
EnochCain on November 11, 2009 at 7:22 PM
And as well…there are no “children” civilians shot…which is usual for these games.
JetBoy on November 11, 2009 at 7:24 PM
It seems to me that Islam is a far more potent mind control agent that results in extreme violence than any video game in the history of the world.
Perhaps we should place age ratings and restrictions on Islam?
Perhaps we should ban Islam altogether?
Chris37 on November 11, 2009 at 7:24 PM
I think you just committed a hate crime.
EnochCain on November 11, 2009 at 7:25 PM
I miss Wolfenstein.
TugboatPhil on November 11, 2009 at 7:28 PM
Meh. I’ll stick to World of Warcraft…thanks anyway.
Left Coast Right Mind on November 11, 2009 at 7:29 PM
You don’t have to shoot anyone in this section. They still get shot but you personally don’t have to. Additionally, they ask you if you would prefer to skip this level at the beginning of the game. Given that, it’s still pretty disturbing, and I think that is the point.
skree on November 11, 2009 at 7:29 PM
Makarov, if memory serves tried to nuke every major city on the East Coast in Call of Duty 4. While this is sickening, its about an agent trying to get undercover to prevent another similar attack from happening. Is the scenario plausible in real life? Let’s hope not…
angelwing34215 on November 11, 2009 at 7:30 PM
Feed the id bloody gobbets… feed the id bloody gobbets…
(That’s what the id says to do.)
Better that they use alien lizards or fanged pumpkins for targets in these games.
This crass desensitizing, the making morally weightless such slaughtering of humans, to the amorally-naive subconscious, is not going to produce a good interior crop.
Pumpkin-headed alien lizards, not your neighbors, please.
profitsbeard on November 11, 2009 at 7:31 PM
My 15 year old son is playing this game as I write this, even though we normally have a strict “no video games during the school week” policy (it’s new, and it’s Veterans Day…?). He and his friends absolutely love this series, because it’s all about getting the terrorists. They could not wait for Modern Warfare 2 to come out, and it hasn’t disappointed. There’s no pc garbage, and they come away with a deep respect for the guys who actually fight these battles in real life. Is it pretty? No–but neither is war.
varnson on November 11, 2009 at 7:32 PM
I have the game. That mission was disturbing and I actually didn’t fire my weapon the whole time. It accurately portrays the horror of terrorism.
This Makarov guy is supposed to be a brutal mercenary and communist revolutionary.
AbaddonsReign on November 11, 2009 at 7:32 PM
I can also sum this up – Makarov in C0D4 takes one of your characters early on where all you can do is move your head and he shoots him while explaining his desire to create a new totalitarian russia. In fact one of the scenes in the game have one of his fellow gun men EXPLICITLY state “Remember, do not shoot any Russians”.
It should be noted that good chunks of the game involve battle in crowded streets where, when you play as the Western forces, your job is specifically to AVOID hitting civilians.
Also anyone who’s played it to the end (haven’t gotten that far), does anyone want to comment on the fight in a DC covered in enemy soldiers?
Defector01 on November 11, 2009 at 7:33 PM
Guten Tag!! POW POW POW!
DaveS on November 11, 2009 at 7:33 PM
If you want to take the end run to this, it\’d be that participating in this type of act, even if your ultimate goal is the utmost of good intentions (through obviously horrible means), is a bad idea, because at the end of the level, the player is shot and killed by Marakov. A dead American sparks a war between Russia and America, with most of DC being decimated. Is killing Russian Soldiers in the streets and various buildings of DC, and then indeed American soldiers loyal to the Bad Guy in this game less distressing? The game pushes the limits, but so what?
Dopavash on November 11, 2009 at 7:35 PM
I guess one argument could be that many just skip the cutscenes, and thus miss a lot of any plot there may be. This could be a way to circumvent that.
Kotoku (Gizmodo sis. site) railed on Fox&Friends for railing on this game. I think at the very least games like this are worth a discussion.
eforhan on November 11, 2009 at 7:37 PM
Their is a scene in the last part of the DC episodes that encapsulates the anger and rage of the US soldiers looking out over their destroyed Capitol, and it has a very familiar tone.
The whole US part is pretty horrifying in making you realize that our country could like Bosnia very quickly if something like this ever went down.
Tman on November 11, 2009 at 7:38 PM
MOST states don’t allow stores to sell M rated (or worse) games to children under the suggested age on the box. If you try to buy this game in CA with no ID and you don’t look like you are solidly over 18 they will tell you to come back with your mom or dad to buy it.
Also in the game the character(s) work for the ‘good guys’ sure he has to participate in this heinous act on some level to maintain cover but the game isn’t some kinda AQ training film glorifying terrorism.
The whole series revolves around trying to snuff it out but it doesn’t soft sell it and make it like a John Wayne movie where the cavalry rides in every time to save the day. Sometimes the good guys get a shot to the gut sometimes they win.
MannyT-vA on November 11, 2009 at 7:40 PM
Nice spoiler.
/not playing, but still
Enoxo on November 11, 2009 at 7:40 PM
My son bought it at midnight played it through in 4 hours and now playing in multiplayer. He said the story is crap but the game is very good. He did the airport scene and he said then the agent gets a kicker surprise. It sets up the other story and worse things happen than a bunch of civilians get shot.
The graphics are very good and it looks pretty real. But there are scenes where it is set as no friendly fire deaths.
RAH on November 11, 2009 at 7:41 PM
Yes, that scene is disturbing, that’s the point. I’ve just played through this game and believe it or not it’s very conservative. The main bad guys are indeed very very bad. And the U.S. Military and Intelligence services are portrayed as the good guys! Besides, it’s a friggin game, and a fun one at that. *SPOILER ALERT* Besides, once you complete that scene the Russians you are undercover with kill your character. Bottom line, this isn’t any worse than the dozens of movies that portray the same thing.
SG1_Conservative on November 11, 2009 at 7:43 PM
You mean I can’t really carjack an ambulance and drive it down a crowded sidewalk while throwing grenades out the window and not get arrested or killed?
There goes my plans for the night.
RadClown on November 11, 2009 at 7:48 PM
The gamer community has been talking about this for weeks and opinions vary, but it does have a point, you can skip the scene and no, you don’t actually have to kill any civilians.
Anyone crapping on it I hope will at least search out the background first.
SouthernDem on November 11, 2009 at 7:51 PM
I liked the story personally. It’s intense and actually quite plausible, if you know the story from Modern Warfare 1. The main reason I also oppose sensationalist coverage of games like this is that it leads to liberal politicians, and even certain conservative politicians being so outraged that they demand regulation over who can get these games and when, hence stealing more of your liberty. Besides if parents would actually bother to look at and follow the ESRB labels when they purchase a game this wouldn’t be a problem. It’s the same as taking your kid to an R rated slasher flick. It’s called common sense people.
SG1_Conservative on November 11, 2009 at 7:52 PM
Oh, and anyone that gets outrageously outraged over this should really check out GTA: The Ballad of Gay Tony, where you’re character can basically roam the streets mowing down civs.
SouthernDem on November 11, 2009 at 7:52 PM
This game is like what a real terror campaign is like in the US, Rio and Russia. Do we really think that enemy will care about civilians if that is their mission? Though I do not expect that the killers would get all the people.
The battle in DC is pretty horrific. Do people think war is pretty? This is the good guys trying to infiltrate the bad guys to stop worse items.
At least it is not PC and clearly shows who are the bad guys and why.
RAH on November 11, 2009 at 7:54 PM
Sorry, I don’t play nintendoes any more.
fronclynne on November 11, 2009 at 7:58 PM
Then why comment? It’s not on Nintendo btw.
SG1_Conservative on November 11, 2009 at 7:59 PM
Great. Now the game will be banned before I even own it. No, I was not going to play this particular scene, but I am a fan FPS and COD/MW. By the way, Pundon’t, what’s got your panties all up in a bunch? Why would such a deep intellectual atheist such as yourself care about death and destruction in a video game? Oh I know, maybe because you’re FAKING IT!
long_cat on November 11, 2009 at 8:01 PM
My son is 19 and has been playing FPS since Castle Wolfstein . He hasn’t yet decided to so it in real life.
Call of Duty is very pro American but portrays like it is a real story. The last COD4 had a better story but this has better graphics.
Wired review also agreed the plot was poor.
Lots of US soldiers like COD and this game. Maybe we should allow all people to be armed they may be able to stop a similar carnage like FT Hood.
RAH on November 11, 2009 at 8:01 PM
I couldn’t figure out which one was Mario.
fronclynne on November 11, 2009 at 8:02 PM
And my dad was worried when I spent all night ‘killing’ demons and wights by rolling dice on my friend’s kitchen table. *sigh*
pannw on November 11, 2009 at 8:04 PM
I didn’t mean to imply anything about you or your son. I was just making a general point, about how politicians will be so “outraged” that they will decide it’s no longer a parent’s call as to what video games to buy. Plus, I generally believe that people are responsible for their own actions and don’t become killers over a video game or movie. Unfortunately, the media will draw that conclusion, assuming that we’re all idiots who become killers after a few hours of exposure to a violent game and then they will demand action on our behalf, and I think we all know where that leads…
SG1_Conservative on November 11, 2009 at 8:07 PM
no problem here
Too bad they werent mowing down skinnies (somalians)
that is actual mil speak so have at it
Maybe planting explosives in a mosque,,,
Sonosam on November 11, 2009 at 8:08 PM
what do you call an ethiopian with a sore toe
A 5 iron
Sonosam on November 11, 2009 at 8:11 PM
Do we really want to bring back the PMRC and Tipper Gore just this time with video games?
Byzantine on November 11, 2009 at 8:12 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »