In EVERY country where Muslims are a minority there is a TERRORISM PROBLEM or even a JIHAD PROBLEM including the Philippines, Holland, Thailand, the UK and the United States.

There are NO such problems with ANY OTHER RELIGION. There are two eventual choices-join the rest of the community or be treated like outcast, outlaw dogs.

Thet ‘they’ is Muslims. You should read about Islam sometime then you’d understand

Trafalgar on November 11, 2009 at 1:25 PM

You are incorrect that all Muslims want to convert or kill everyone. Do you think that Muhammad Ali wants you converted or dead? Kareem Abdul-Jabaar? Mos Def? Dave Chappelle?

Did Kareem Rashad Sultan Khan? Is that why he enlisted in the Army, being awarded a Bronze Star and dying in service to America?

That’s an awfully weird way to go about killing or converting all non-believers.

He wanted to destroy a symbol of American capitalism and/or government, hobble our economy, and lure us into a war which would serve Islamists’ purposes? What is your evidence of this?

orange on November 11, 2009 at 12:35 PM

But enough about Obama!

He wanted to destroy a symbol of American capitalism and/or government, hobble our economy, and lure us into a war which would serve Islamists’ purposes? What is your evidence of this?

orange on November 11, 2009 at 12:35 PM

Boy, it must take a lot of crania convolutions for you to come up with this stuff! Maj. Hasan did destroy a symbol of American government (soldiers) and he didn’t want to ‘lure us into a war’, we’re already in one with Islamists…it’s been in all the papers and on TV, thought maybe you’d caught a little of it over the last 8 years.

Don’t waste your time waiting for the government. Get prepared and head down to the sporting goods store and obtain the essentials. This will happen again someday. If you aren’t Muslim, you are an infidel. They want you converted, or dead.

AZ_Redneck on November 11, 2009 at 11:58 AM

Who exactly is “they” in that last sentence?

orange on November 11, 2009 at 12:00 PM

Thet ‘they’ is Muslims. You should read about Islam sometime then you’d understand

Is there a particular reason, other than to garner sympathy for the terrorist, that you are so hellbent on stopping anyone from whispering the word terrorism?

Couple that, with their friendly relationship with the White House, and this could potentially go a lot further up. Not that we’ll ever hear that portion.

Also….how many of us could be on our computers, and search out anything having to do with terrorism, or their groups, and not get a nice friendly visit from the FBI? This is absolutely inexcusable.

Please make your argument coherently.
orange on November 11, 2009 at 12:49 PM

What’s the saying? – Physician heal thyself!

And now that we have a mountain of incontrovertible proof, it’s even MORE important to never come to any conclusions about the Fort Hood killings.

logis on November 11, 2009 at 12:39 PM

LOL! Yes, of course.

He probably also knew that idiots like you would defend him as a victim.

Vera on November 11, 2009 at 12:43 PM

I have never defended him as a victim. Please make your argument coherently.

logis on November 11, 2009 at 12:39 PM

+1
spot on

Let me spell this out for you since you seem to have trouble with comprehension. Every single Islamic terrorist attack has the same ultimate purpose. Demoralize the enemy. Hasan knew that the best way he could demoralize the US was to attack our soldiers on our home base. He probably also knew that idiots like you would defend him as a victim.

Now, in which instance did the SCM pass judgment on the motivations and actions of said person(s) and which one we’re we told to ‘Not jump to conclusions’?
Fake8 on November 11, 2009 at 12:30 PM

That’s not a fair comparison. Conservatives are a clear and present danger to society, and therefore should never be given any benefit of a doubt.

But there is no reason to believe that radical Islamists may be involved in some kind of “conspiracy.” That’s just crazy talk — I heard the President himself say so.

And now that we have a mountain of incontrovertible proof, it’s even MORE important to never come to any conclusions about the Fort Hood killings.

Orange, his terrorist motives were identical to the 9/11 hijackers.

Vera on November 11, 2009 at 12:28 PM

He wanted to destroy a symbol of American capitalism and/or government, hobble our economy, and lure us into a war which would serve Islamists’ purposes? What is your evidence of this?

In one instance where we have one person who we know a great deal about – his background, etc.

And in another – like the gathering of Tea Party people on the capital steps the other day- we have thousands of people of many varied backgrounds.

In the first instance, we know the actions of this one person – murdering and wounding a number of Unarmed soldiers.

In the second, we have thousands simply exercising their right to Free-speech.

Now, in which instance did the SCM pass judgment on the motivations and actions of said person(s) and which one we’re we told to ‘Not jump to conclusions’?

PC will go down in flames hopefully very soon