Fox-bashing Obama aide to step down

posted at 12:55 pm on November 10, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

The woman who became the face of the White House war on Fox News will leave her post at the end of this month.  Anita Dunn, who also got heavily criticized for stating that one of her philosophical touchstones was Chinese communist Mao Zedong, will return to the private sector but remain available to the Obama administration as a consultant:

White House communications director Anita Dunn will step down from her post at the end of the month and Dan Pfeiffer, her deputy, will take over, according to sources familiar with the move.

Dunn, a longtime Democratic media consultant, took over the job on an interim basis earlier this year when Ellen Moran abruptly left the post to take a job at the Commerce Department. Dunn will return to Squier Knapp Dunn, the consulting firm where she is a partner, but will remain as a consultant to the White House on the communications and strategic matters. …

The passing of the baton from Dunn to Pfeiffer had long been expected within White House circles as she had made clear when she took the job that the “interim” in her title was meant to be taken literally.

Unlike when Moran left, the transition should be somewhat seamless as Dunn and Pfeiffer are longtime confidantes — having worked closely in [Tom] Daschle’s political orbit for years.

As Chris Cillizza notes, this does not come as a surprise.  Dunn never intended to stick around long, which is why some assumed the White House tasked her with leading the war of words on Fox News.  The Chairman Mao quote proved embarrassing, especially in that context, but obviously not fatal to her status as a temporary stopgap.  Had it done that much damage, the White House would have looked elsewhere for her replacement rather than appointing her protege.

The change does give the administration an opportunity to withdraw from the Fox War, though, and it has already given hints of reconsidering its widely-panned strategy of marginalizing the network.  For one thing, it has obviously backfired, as Fox’s audience has grown rather than diminished; it outperformed all of the other cable networks combined for Election Night coverage.  David Axelrod made an 11-minute appearance on Fox last week, and the white flag from the White House was not exactly subtle.

Interestingly, Cillizza also hints that Rahm Emanuel wants to “return to elected office in the not-so-distant future.”  He won’t want to go back to the House, and there’s an open Senate seat up for grabs in Illinois — Obama’s old seat, now being occupied temporarily by Roland Burris.  If Emanuel wants to run for that seat, he’ll have to start soon, and no later than the State of the Union address if he wants to keep other prominent Illinois Democrats out of the primary.  Could we be seeing a new chief of staff — and what would that mean for Obama’s proclivity for letting Nancy Pelosi run his legislative agenda?

Update: David Plouffe flogged his book on Fox, not Axelrod. Axelrod appeared for 11 minutes on Fox last week to discuss policy, not a book. My apologies for the error.


Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Preach it brother. The Founders were no dummies. They understand that leaving things up to man would ultimately lead to disaster. But we have moved so far from the original meaning of the Constitution that we have allowed man to rule over us with the predictable results.

NotCoach on May 24, 2013 at 6:45 PM

Whether it’s from incompetence or a lack of accountability or too much complexity or — dare I even write it — something perhaps more sinister, the layers of a large bureaucracy conveniently provide too many available smokescreens for mistakes and abuses. I doubt very much that we’ve seen the last of these types of big-government engendered injustices coming out of the Obama administration, and none of it makes a very compelling case for growing the government still further.

Better watch who you call or text or email now, Erika. And, stay off those adult websites, by all means. Big Brother’s awatchin’. ;-)

TXUS on May 24, 2013 at 6:52 PM

Whether he was involved in these scandals from the beginning or not, one thing that is certain: his subsequent behavior in protecting, lying, stalling, etc makes Barack Obama the direct owner of them.

Rich H on May 24, 2013 at 6:54 PM

I doubt very much that we’ve seen the last of these types of big-government engendered injustices coming out of the Obama administration, and none of it makes a very compelling case for growing the government still further.

Your problem, Erika, is that you are a reasonable person looking at the issue in a reasonable way. Unfortunately, there is a critical mass of people who are not reasonable and believe that the problem is that the government is not big enough and is not spending enough money.

catsandbooks on May 24, 2013 at 6:55 PM

I always wondered how Germany fell for Nazism in the 30s. How could they be so stupid?

Ouch.

faraway on May 24, 2013 at 6:55 PM

Each of these events is the direct byproduct of two central philosophies of the Obama administration — the massive expansion of the size and power of the federal government and a lack of trust in the American people. …

Bobby, I love ya man! I voted for you when you first ran for Congress. But you’re wrong here. It isn’t a lack of trust in the American people it is contempt for the American people. An attitude that the American public isn’t intelligent enough to know what is good for them.

Happy Nomad on May 24, 2013 at 7:01 PM

The Big Crime Syndicate of Obama should be the biggest loser.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:11 PM

Good stuff Bobby. Keep honing that message. Hoping for big things from him in 2016.

can_con on May 24, 2013 at 7:11 PM

The Obama presidency, and liberalism in general, are based on not trusting the American people — a belief that big government is better for people. The latest scandals show why liberalism and big government don’t work. …

Bobby must have been listening to Rush this week, because he said much the same thing: trying to pin it on Obama is not working; instead, it all shows the failure of liberalism and big government writ large.

It isn’t a lack of trust in the American people it is contempt for the American people.
Happy Nomad on May 24, 2013 at 7:01 PM

This is it exactly. Contempt. These government types are those who wouldn’t bat an eye to hustle us all off to “reeducation camps.”

PatriotGal2257 on May 24, 2013 at 7:13 PM

Even small government would be bad if run by criminals. Jindal seems to have tunnel vision.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:13 PM

Jindal seems to be implicitly saying that government is so big it got out of Obama’s control. Bull.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:17 PM

Even small government would be bad if run by criminals. Jindal seems to have tunnel vision.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:13 PM

I’ll take a small government run by criminals any day over the bloated and corrupt mess we have now.

NotCoach on May 24, 2013 at 7:18 PM

Bobby must have been listening to Rush this week, because he said much the same thing: trying to pin it on Obama is not working; instead, it all shows the failure of liberalism and big government writ large.

PatriotGal2257 on May 24, 2013 at 7:13 PM

Then they are both simply Obama apologists.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:20 PM

I’ll take a small government run by criminals any day over the bloated and corrupt mess we have now.

NotCoach on May 24, 2013 at 7:18 PM

And take being shot with a .22 over being shot with a 30.06. I prefer neither.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:22 PM

Obama is a much bigger target than big government. Only fools can not see this.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:24 PM

I thought Jindal was just saying we needed to stop arguing about big government because it was a loser? Pfft.

echosyst on May 24, 2013 at 7:27 PM

We will always have big government. Even under Reagan we had big government. He didn’t/couldn’t even get rid of the Dept of “Education”. Now is not the time to turn all batteries at big government. At least 5 of 6 guns should be aimed and firing at Obama. If Limbaugh and Jindal are not up to the task, they should get the hell out of the way.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:29 PM

I always wondered how Germany fell for Nazism in the 30s. How could they be so stupid?

Ouch.

faraway on May 24, 2013 at 6:55 PM

…you’re not faraway at all!…you’re right on!

KOOLAID2 on May 24, 2013 at 7:30 PM

VorDaj, saying that Rush n Jindal should “step aside” simply becuase they dont go far enough, INHO, isn’t reason enough. Besides who else out there do you think has the platform or the common sense governance to at least get ‘our’ side of the conversation out there, esepcially to those that we’d like to convince? If you got a candidate in mind, im sure we could find a few holes in *thier* Geopolitical theory also.

BlaxPac on May 24, 2013 at 7:46 PM

I won’t go into details about my 44 years Military and Civilian experience with Viet Nam and Vietnamese and Vietnamese-American Society. I do agree that the Democrats, who were responsible for getting into that war and after killing a few million S E Asians and including non combat deaths over 100,000 Americans, betrayed our Vietnamese and Cambodian allies and sabotaged the South Vietnamese War effort insuring the defeat of South Viet Nam in 1974 and 1975. Yes, I was there at that time.

That said, over the last 30 years the current Vietnamese has been struggling to dismantle what was a very authoritarian Communist Government. From my first post War visit in 1995 till now(I’ve retired here), Viet Nam has made astonishing progress in dismantling the old regime. Except for Reagan, we Americans have mostly gone the other way.

Think about it.

Linh_My on May 24, 2013 at 7:53 PM

And take being shot with a .22 over being shot with a 30.06. I prefer neither.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:22 PM

False equivalency. A better one is a million .22s vs. 1 30.06. I’ll take my chances with the single 30.06. Not only that we can better respond to and destroy the single 30.06.

NotCoach on May 24, 2013 at 7:54 PM

Even under Reagan we had big government. He didn’t/couldn’t even get rid of the Dept of “Education”.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:29 PM

and that was before it really got entrenched—5-6 years into it.

arnold ziffel on May 24, 2013 at 7:55 PM

test

RickB on May 24, 2013 at 8:43 PM

F. Hayak wrote in his book “The Road To Serfdom” that Hitler was voted into power by large numbers of “docile and gullible” people who believed the lies (propaganda)told by Hitler and his elites.

Sound familiar? History repeats.

nofreelunch on May 24, 2013 at 11:02 PM

F. Hayak wrote in his book “The Road To Serfdom” that Hitler was voted into power by large numbers of “docile and gullible” people who believed the lies (propaganda)told by Hitler and his elites.

Sound familiar? History repeats.

nofreelunch on May 24, 2013 at 11:02 PM

Lord have mercy, here I am defending or explaining Germans.

Adolph Hitler never got a clear majority in an election. He sorta grabbed power by exploiting deals, tricks, vacuums and technicalities. That aspect may now in replay before us.

Howover, I never heard of any elite behind him.

He was a thug, soldier and street fighter.

Unless OFA takes to the streets and Obama starts looking to build a vengeful, word dominating America, the two have little in common except a love of government power.

IlikedAUH2O on May 25, 2013 at 12:03 AM

the two have little in common except a love of government power.

IlikedAUH2O on May 25, 2013 at 12:03 AM

Well that in itself, and there are other things, is an awful lot.

VorDaj on May 25, 2013 at 1:33 AM

You know. My maid understands this may be one of the most dangerous, egregious, undermining of The Constitution since the Japanese internment. But neither Congress, The Senate, nor Obama seem to get it. This can destroy the nation.

pat on May 25, 2013 at 2:16 AM

An attitude that the American public isn’t intelligent enough to know what is good for them.

Happy Nomad on May 24, 2013 at 7:01 PM

Well, they did vote for Øbama – twice. Maybe there’s something to that. :)

At least 5 of 6 guns should be aimed and firing at Obama. If Limbaugh and Jindal are not up to the task, they should get the hell out of the way.

VorDaj on May 24, 2013 at 7:29 PM

The last I checked, Øbama is not up for reelection. We certainly need to pound him but also those who think like him (you know, big govt types).

Odysseus on May 25, 2013 at 7:46 AM

Lots of blah, blah, blah…because in the back of the Republican’s mind is that some day they will be back in the White House and they will do everything Obama is doing. Any criticism will be met with “Obama did the same thing and no one cared, so we can do it, too.”

albill on May 25, 2013 at 8:58 AM

The last I checked, Øbama is not up for reelection. We certainly need to pound him but also those who think like him (you know, big govt types).

Odysseus on May 25, 2013 at 7:46 AM

Beyond that, Obama has benefited from a lot of unethical behavior by liberals in general (and in government specifically). He is more post turtle than mastermind. His culpability is probably mostly in implicitly endorsing this kind of behavior in his speeches. He has a history of turning a blind eye to what others do to win his elections for him.

Count to 10 on May 25, 2013 at 9:07 AM

Bobby “BJ” Jindal: blah, blah, blah, big government is bad, blah, blah, blah, American flag, blah, blah, blah, Obama sucks, blah, blah, blah, the people, blah, blah, blah. This guy NEVER says anything new. Suck it, BJ.

HiJack on May 25, 2013 at 9:43 AM

Lots of blah, blah, blah…because in the back of the Republican’s mind is that some day they will be back in the White House and they will do everything Obama is doing. Any criticism will be met with “Obama did the same thing and no one cared, so we can do it, too.”

albill on May 25, 2013 at 8:58 AM

Absolutely, positively. We can bank on it.

HiJack on May 25, 2013 at 9:45 AM

“…none of it makes a very compelling case for growing the government still further.”

You’re missing the point Erika Johnsen: Takers gotta take. They don’t need no ‘compelling reason’as long as they’re on the receiving end. It’s why they vote democrat.

locomotivebreath1901 on May 25, 2013 at 9:51 AM

People are so afraid of calling Obama Cheat, liar, crook or whatever name that’s appropriate. If people had been this kind to Richard Nixon his face would be on Mt. Rushmore by now.

Herb on May 25, 2013 at 9:53 AM

Calling this government paternalistic is cowardly. This government is authoritarian and moving toward tyrannical.

The media are not in bed with the left; they are the left. They are the same people.

InterestedObserver on May 25, 2013 at 10:15 AM

I always wondered how Germany fell for Nazism in the 30s. How could they be so stupid?

Ouch.

faraway on May 24, 2013 at 6:55 PM

We’ve killed 55,000,000 of our children.

We’re not much better than the Nazis.

itsnotaboutme on May 25, 2013 at 3:59 PM