Huckabee: Palin’s getting more media buzz than me because she’s attractive

posted at 7:00 pm on November 9, 2009 by Allahpundit

I’m a little surprised Sarahcuda hasn’t gone after him for this. Too early, maybe?

Palin is the party’s rock star.

“Some of the people who had excoriated me and really been very dismissive of me for views that I had taken, and labeled me anything from a populist to an ignoramus — the same people have been very defensive [of] and laudatory to Sarah Palin,” Huckabee noted, adding that he’d invited her to appear on his weekly Fox show but “could never get any contact.”

“I’m glad she’s getting the props — I know I’m not nearly as attractive,” he said with a guileless grin.

If pressed on this, no doubt he’ll go into “aw shucks” mode and insist he was merely paying her a compliment, but this isn’t the first time he’s attributed Palin’s appeal to her looks. Remember this from last November?

Neither was he quite so unperturbed by the Palin pick: “I was scratching my head, saying, ‘Hey, wait a minute. She’s wonderful, but the only difference was she looks better in stilettos than I do, and she has better hair.’ It wasn’t so much a gender issue, but it was like they suddenly decided that everything they disliked about me was O.K. . . . She was given a pass by some of the very people who said I wasn’t prepared.”

He polls well with women and she polls badly, so from the standpoint of pure cynical self-interest, she could score an easy point on a potential rival by challenging his rhetoric as sexist here. Why doesn’t she? Is it because she doesn’t want to call attention to the fact that she and Huck are pretty similar, actually? Or is she thinking strategically, that if she runs and he doesn’t she’ll need his endorsement down the line? Her book tour does include a stop in Iowa

Don’t laugh at the idea that Huck might not run, either. Does this sound like a guy who’s trying to make friends ahead of 2012?

But some attitudes don’t change. Huckabee met in the spring with Pat Toomey, then the president of the Wall Street-backed Club for Growth, which had attacked him during the 2008 campaign for raising taxes in Arkansas.

“It wasn’t very productive,” he said of the meeting. “I realized then that these guys are just what I thought they were — they’re pay for play, and they do it anonymously on behalf of people who don’t want to be known as the funders of these hit operations. I find that repulsive.”

Given that fiscal conservatives are the people Huck will have to win over to beat Romney, TNR calls this knock on CfG “the functional equivalent of Mitt Romney trashing evangelicals.” Exit question: Is Huck running or not?

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Americannodash on November 9, 2009 at 10:35 PM

James Garfield. 1880s, short tenure due to assassination. Minister and elder in the Christian church.

cs89 on November 9, 2009 at 10:56 PM

MaximusConfessor on November 9, 2009 at 10:51 PM

Got a link to that “unabashed support” for amnesty?

cs89 on November 9, 2009 at 10:57 PM

No difference between Mormonism and Christian denominations? Let me acquaint you with a text known as “The Book of Mormon.”

That said, I’d vote for Romney over Obama any day.

cs89 on November 9, 2009 at 10:31 PM

Mitt was my second choice after Fred (he kind of screwed the pooch with his endorsement of Bennett for re-election)

That said, I’ve read the book of Mormon and the D & Cs. Like I said – mythology without the benefit of years of indoctrination that the other Christian sects enjoy. Let me paraphrase Bart Simpson: “People! can’t you see that the little differences between us are nothing compared to the big similarities.”

SaintGeorgeGentile on November 9, 2009 at 10:57 PM

Proud Rino are you Meghan McCain?

Palin cleaned Obidens clock in that debate. Obiden just stood there and made shit up and Palin couldn’t even rebut them all or would have never gotten her points across.
Who do you think the presstitute whores would say won the thing?
They have been and still are kissin Dem ass.
Who broke and Covered the Edwards misstress scandle?
Who broke and covered the ACORN scandle.
Hint:
Not the people who said Obiden the Village Idiot won the debate, those tools are just the propaganda wing of the DNC.

dhunter on November 9, 2009 at 10:57 PM

BeachGirlUSA,

You know I would be on here defending Mike Huckabee. Thanks for your comment. As much as I posted before, I had hoped that you would have given Mike Huckabee a second chance. I have seen your posts, and it seems like you really haven’t changed your mind one little bit! I think it really stinks how Alluhpundit keeps making his snarky remarks against Mike Huckabee. Haven’t you noticed when there is a bad article about Sarah,Alluh has to make a nasty comment about Huckabee liking it or something like that at the end of his comments. He just wants all of you to be against Mike Huckabee, and the easiest way for him to do that is make it look like Huckabee is being a sexist person against Sarah. It’s disgusting. I am done defending him against people on this site who dissed him for articles he published that showed Sarah in a bad light. (I am sure he’ll care, LOL). When any of you has walked in Mike Huckabee’s shoes (like being a Republican Gov. in Arkansas), you can judge how he ran that state as Gov. and what he had to do to help the people in Arkansas.

MikeHuckabee really is a nice guy. For anybody on this site who thinks differently, I wonder what they would think if Sarah had been treated like Mike Huckabee by the radio and TV pundits? He was run into the ground by Rush Limbaugh in 2008, yet when Sarah was selected as VP, Rush was right on board and for the same reasons he was AGAINST Mike Huckabee. If they had done this to Sarah Palin all of you would be saying much worse things than MH. You should hear how Beck and O’Reilly put down other TV stations for supporting Obama, yet they did the same thing when they supported Romney during 2008 and pushed him every day on radio and TV and they knew about Romneycare. Even now some listeners have commented on Sean Hannity’s radio show about Romneycare and Hannity just ignores the comments or supports Romneycare as different than Obamacare. We all know it’s the same. Yet when Huckabee (you know the person who is on Fox News like they are) wins a lot of polls, they ignore it and never even mention it on their shows. Right after the VV vote where MH won by a 2-1 margin against his rivals, Hannity never mentioned Huckabee won. The next day on this TV show he had the panel discuss who they thought would be the next 2012 Pres. candidate. Hannity mentioned everybody’s name BUT Mike Huckabee. Do you see why it’s hard to understand why they do that? They act nice to his face, and ignore him on the air.

MH has always supported Sarah Palin. He even tried to give her good advice when she quit as Gov. There were articles saying she might drop out of the Republican Party, but MH said on an interview that he hoped she wouldn’t drop out of the Party because he knows that it’s real hard for a 3rd party to win in elections, and she has a great future in the Republican Party (even if the Establishment doesn’t support her either).

I have listed many, many ways Mike Huckabee and Sarah Palin are very similar…not just that they are pro-life and populists. That’s why the Huckabee supporters were thrilled when Sarah Palin was picked to be VP. You don’t hear people on Mike Huckabee’s websites putting down Sarah Palin like you hear on this website against Mike Huckabee. Lots of you sound much more vicious and meaner than Mike Huckabee could have ever even thought of being, yet you put him down. We know that one of these rivals will be our nominee, and we shouldn’t give the Dems ammunition against our own Party. There are lots of ways to describe why we like or dislike another candidate without resorting to vicious name calling.

VFT on November 9, 2009 at 10:59 PM

Dark-Star on November 9, 2009 at 8:21 PM

Get back under your bridge where you belong.

nelsonknows on November 9, 2009 at 11:01 PM

Sapwolf on November 9, 2009 at 10:28 PM

Thank you for pointing out Huckabee spending. Social COn yes but does the US really need a former governor that raised taxes more than Bill Clinton?

Gracelynn on November 9, 2009 at 11:02 PM

No, the reason she gets more media is because she is more of a threat to the leftist establishment than you are Huck.

Dollayo on November 9, 2009 at 11:03 PM

MaximusConfessor on November 9, 2009 at 10:51 PM

You again. If you write something here at HOT AIR – provide a link. I trust you as far as — well — I don’t trust you. You are from the part of our society that likes to make stuff up.

Americannodash on November 9, 2009 at 11:03 PM

I guess NO ONE saw the FACT that 3 of Huckabees pardonees have committed murder in ONE county in Missouri.
How many people has Palin pardoned? ZERO?

nelsonknows on November 9, 2009 at 11:10 PM

Americannodash on November 9, 2009 at 11:03 PM

This idiot, Maximus, is a Ron Paul acolyte, which is pretty similar to the Obama acolytes.
Ron Paul is this idiot’s messiah, Ron Paul the 911 Troofer and fraud. Does that tell you enough about Maximus?

nelsonknows on November 9, 2009 at 11:13 PM

Too many bridges are missing their trolls.

nelsonknows on November 9, 2009 at 11:14 PM

Palin cleaned Obidens clock in that debate.

So you say. Any liberal can say the exact opposite. So what’s an objective measure – how can we look at this issue through a nonpartisan lens in order to see which claim is actually correct?

Well, it’s pretty simple. This isn’t debate club. The “winner” is the person that people think won the debate.

Go look at the polls and tell me what you find out!

Proud Rino on November 9, 2009 at 11:18 PM

Sapwolf,

In the 2008 race, many people seemed to forget that the majority of Arkansas’ tax increases were for court-mandated school expenditures or for improvements of roads in Arkansas as approved by vote of its citizens. If I were of the purist mindset–zero tax increases–I might possibly call him “a tax and spend liberal,” as many have suggested. However, examining the evidence has led me to a very different conclusion.

Opponents of Mike Huckabee often fail to point out that he cut taxes over ninety times during his ten years as governor of Arkansas to counteract these mandated tax increases.* They fail, also, to point out that fiscal conservatives are concerned not only with keeping taxes low, but also with balancing the budget. Amazingly, in Arkansas, with a heavily Democrat legislature–in fact the most lop-sided in the country–Huckabee somehow was able to pass these tax cuts to keep his state’s budget balanced.**

For additional proof, look at what occurred during the tenure of Huckabee’s governorship. According to http://www.taxfoundation.org we find that from the year before he took office to the last year he served (1996-2008), Arkansas’ tax burden went from 10.1% to 11.1%. That was an increase of only 1.0%. Compare that minimal 10 ½ year increase to what the national average was during that time, and I’d guess Huckabee did better than most.***

Now if you are going to spend money on something, one would hope to see a good return. As a consequence of spending tax dollars for education–as well as passing laws for better standards–quality of education significantly increased under Gov. Huckabee. Additionally, state funds allocated wisely put more qualified workers in the work force, and improved roads brought new commerce to the state. This valid use of taxpayer’s money actually increased revenues while keeping tax rates from going up.

And on top of that, Huckabee was able to turn his state more Republican. Remember during the Clinton years, Arkansas voted Democrat? Well now, thanks to the governorship of Huckabee, it is one of the few states trending more Republican. That’s something I think we can agree is a good thing. Now, I realize it’s legitimate to argue whether Huckabee can accomplish a repeat of fiscal success on a national scale. So far, it seems he has done a good job of convincing the American people. According to almost every recent poll, he is positioned very well for a Presidential run at 2012.
________
* As Arkansas Governor, Huckabee cut taxes ninety-four times, including the first broad-based cuts in the history of Arkansas. Included were eliminating the marriage penalty, bracket creep caused by inflation, income tax on poor families, and capital gains on home sales. He increased standard deductions for everyone and doubled the child-care tax credits. These changes helped put money in the pockets of Arkansans. He also encouraged investments by cutting capital gains for both individuals and businesses. He encouraged businesses by providing tax credits for employee training and education.
Governor Huckabee left office in January, 2008 with a surplus of almost $850 billion, setting the stage for even more tax cuts for his state.
Source: Do the Right Thing, by Mike Huckabee, pg. 14. Penguin Books: New York, 2008.

** Huckabee as a Republican Governor inherited a legislature in which:
- Eighty-nine of one hundred members of the Arkansas House were Democrat.
- Thirty-one of thirty-five members of the State Senate were Democrats.
- Eighty-nine percent of all legislative members were from the opposing party.
Source: From Hope to Higher Ground, by Mike Huckabee, pg. 102. Hachette Book Group USA: New York, 2008.

*** Political rival for President, Governor Mitt Romney, oversaw the raising of Massachusetts’ taxes by 5% in just one term… “In fact, he raised ‘fees’ by about $700 million.”
Source: Do the Right Thing, by Mike Huckabee, pg. 14. Penguin Books: New York, 2008.

VFT on November 9, 2009 at 11:26 PM

it seems like you really haven’t changed your mind one little bit!

VFT

And its unlikely I ever will. But as I told you once before I do admire your defense of and loyalty to your candidate; Huck’s lucky he has you in his corner.

beachgirlusa on November 9, 2009 at 11:27 PM

Dear Gov Pencil Neck Geek,

Gov Palin gets media “buzz” because the media is scared shitless of her and her American conservative views.

It is really that simple, bud.

jarhead0311 on November 9, 2009 at 11:33 PM

James Garfield. 1880s, short tenure due to assassination. Minister and elder in the Christian church.

cs89 on November 9, 2009 at 10:56 PM

Thanks

Americannodash on November 9, 2009 at 11:33 PM

The “winner” is the person that people think won the debate.

Go look at the polls and tell me what you find out!

Proud Rino on November 9, 2009 at 11:18 PM

Helped along by “flash polls” at the time saying how miserably Palin had failed. Get real.

ddrintn on November 9, 2009 at 11:45 PM

The “winner” is the person that people think won the debate.

Proud Rino on November 9, 2009 at 11:18 PM

In other words, the media declared Biden the clear winner because he didn’t pull off his pants onstage and parade around in his underwear talking about the little green men banging his skull with icepicks.

ddrintn on November 9, 2009 at 11:46 PM

This idiot, Maximus, is a Ron Paul acolyte, which is pretty similar to the Obama acolytes.
Ron Paul is this idiot’s messiah, Ron Paul the 911 Troofer and fraud. Does that tell you enough about Maximus?

nelsonknows on November 9, 2009 at 11:13 PM

Okay. He’ll be ignored.

Americannodash on November 9, 2009 at 11:49 PM

What are you doing? It was a compliment.

No, it wasn’t a compliment at all. It was a classic Huckabee backhanded putdown. And if you weren’t a Huck apologist, you’d see right through it.

Allahpundit on November 9, 2009 at 7:17 PM

Yeeouch! Spot on AP(can’t believe I just typed that). The backhanded compliment is classic Huck style. One of the many reasons I dislike him.

As for why she hasn’t responded…it’s an inconsequential statement by a complete boob. Why waste her time on that?

Or she’ll quit.

Proud Rino on November 9, 2009 at 7:22 PM

Did Obama finish his senate term?

No, he quit.

artist on November 9, 2009 at 7:23 PM

Ok, she did quit. That’s not necessarily as bad as it sounds though. It seems that she either knows Judo, studied The Art Of War, or simply has incredible instincts based on how she jujitsued her Alaskan opponents and has been a massive thorn in the side of Democrats ever since. Clearly Sarah Palin is much more nuanced than Proud Rino and that must smart.

Dongemaharu on November 9, 2009 at 11:49 PM

In other words, the media declared Biden the clear winner because he didn’t pull off his pants onstage and parade around in his underwear talking about the little green men banging his skull with icepicks.

ddrintn on November 9, 2009 at 11:46 PM

I think I wet myself laughing

Shambhala on November 9, 2009 at 11:55 PM

ddrintn on November 9, 2009 at 11:45 PM

I know. Everyone’s always cheating. It’s not that Palin didn’t do a good job. The media cheated and then made everyone think Biden did a better job. It’s never a Republican’s fault. Nice world you live in, but stop by reality sometime. Sometimes it’s cloudy, but at least it’s real.

Ok, she did quit. That’s not necessarily as bad as it sounds though.

Dongemaharu on November 9, 2009 at 11:49 PM

No, but you better get used to it if she runs in 2012 because she’s going to get destroyed by that. Not by Democrats, either.

Proud Rino on November 9, 2009 at 11:55 PM

I know. Everyone’s always cheating. It’s not that Palin didn’t do a good job. The media cheated and then made everyone think Biden did a better job. It’s never a Republican’s fault. Nice world you live in, but stop by reality sometime. Sometimes it’s cloudy, but at least it’s real.

Proud Rino on November 9, 2009 at 11:55 PM

I don’t know if I’d call it “cheating” per se, but there’s certainly an amount of weighted bias there. Palin had to be perfect, Biden only had to get through it semi-conscious.

ddrintn on November 10, 2009 at 12:00 AM

“Made up our own minds”…really now. I bet after watching Fox News, reading a right-wing blog or three and listening to some idiot on a ‘talk’ station.

Dark-Star on November 9, 2009 at 9:40 PM

I made up my own mind based on what I saw and heard. But you go ahead and do it the way you want to do it.

Jim Treacher on November 10, 2009 at 12:10 AM

I know. Everyone’s always cheating. It’s not that Palin didn’t do a good job. The media cheated and then made everyone think Biden did a better job. It’s never a Republican’s fault. Nice world you live in, but stop by reality sometime. Sometimes it’s cloudy, but at least it’s real.

Proud Rino on November 9, 2009 at 11:55 PM

Really
Incoherent
Nattering
Onanist

Jim Treacher on November 10, 2009 at 12:15 AM

I am done defending him
VFT on November 9, 2009 at 10:59 PM

Seriously, you’re done defending Mike Huckabee!? ;)

That would be a wise move if you did.

Conservative Samizdat on November 10, 2009 at 12:21 AM

Proud Rino on November 9, 2009 at 11:55 PM

Proud Rino is Hot Air’s version of Scozzafava.

Tell us your Proud Rino platform that will lead us to victory.

Americannodash on November 10, 2009 at 12:22 AM

Tell us your Proud Rino platform that will lead us to victory.

Americannodash on November 10, 2009 at 12:22 AM

Visit the DNC’s website.

ddrintn on November 10, 2009 at 12:26 AM

Visit the DNC’s website.

ddrintn on November 10, 2009 at 12:26 AM

I know. Proud Rino voted for Obama. Hence, the Scozzafava reference. My guess is that Scozzafava voted for Obama too.

Americannodash on November 10, 2009 at 12:34 AM

Ah! So! The Huckabee take-down of Palin has begun. Mike Huckabee is a nasty vicious piece of work who covers up his nastiness and viciousness behind phony dimpled smiles and pretended guilelessness. He’s like the old filthy whore who does a holo-projection of a sweet young virgin to deceive the johns that they’re getting the real deal. After the purchase, the johns realize they’ve got a pus-ridden, worn out old hag. And I’m being nice to Huckabee.

SilentWatcher on November 10, 2009 at 1:44 AM

Huckabee is a jerk.

He pardoned murderers.

He’s not a viable candidate.

scotash on November 10, 2009 at 1:57 AM

Sodomy (citation Ann Coulter’s charge)

He will lose it for us like McCain did.

Allahpundit did you ever get a chance with voluptuous daughter?

father on November 10, 2009 at 2:54 AM

This is hilarious! The Evangelical/Fundy crowd will never consider Romney a christian when in fact the only difference is that Mormonism doesn’t have the centuries of mythology behind it.

SaintGeorgeGentile on November 9, 2009 at 10:18 PM

Don’t make me pull this thread over and com back there!!

There Goes The Neighborhood on November 10, 2009 at 3:12 AM

He thinks Sarah is popular because she’s beautiful and I think Huckster polls well because he’s fat. Anyone check his polling data in New Jersey?

Sultry Beauty on November 10, 2009 at 3:37 AM

Lessee here…do I want a Republican president who will

a. Lower taxes from a grossly unfair amount to a merely unfair amount, search for “government-based solutions”, lower the amount of Federal stimulus and pork packages, and tweak the New Deal/Great Society programs in order to make them a little more fiscally responsible.

0r

b. Stick a knife in the throat of entitlement programs and the American Marxist movement, and stamp out corruption in the Federal government.

Tough choices here.

Dr. ZhivBlago on November 10, 2009 at 5:10 AM

No, it’s because she is a real conservative.

darwin-t on November 10, 2009 at 7:42 AM

It’s just what people say when a woman is a competitor. We all know that.

The easiest way to dismiss a woman’s ideas is to make sure it’s all about her looks.

AnninCA on November 10, 2009 at 8:37 AM

I’m a little surprised Sarahcuda hasn’t gone after him

Sarah, unlike Obama, doesn’t swat at flies.

- The Cat

MirCat on November 10, 2009 at 8:49 AM

Neither Huckabee, Romney, or Palin will be the Republican nominee in 2012.
These people are presently serving their purpose of taking flak, drawing fire from the media and liberals (and Republicans), attacking the Democrats and Obama so that the real nominee (who ever that is) has time to work under the radar.

albill on November 10, 2009 at 8:56 AM

The easiest way to dismiss a woman’s ideas is to make sure it’s all about her looks.

AnninCA on November 10, 2009 at 8:37 AM

Less than a week before Palin appears on Oprah and other shows, including O’Reilly.

We’ll see how she handles that.

No doubt we’ll be seeing gazillion comment threads.

darwin on November 10, 2009 at 9:00 AM

Hey Huckster,I suspect she’s getting more attention than you (even with your freebie FOX show) because she’s free from that disease you have -RINO-itis.

Don L on November 10, 2009 at 9:03 AM

The biggest difference between Palin and the rest of the GOP crowd is that the great majority of GOPer’s think and act like politicians.

Palin doesn’t. She says and does what she thinks is right. That was obvious when she resigned the governorship in Alaska. It was a politically dangerous move, yet the best decision for the state and people of Alaska.

darwin on November 10, 2009 at 9:10 AM

VFT on November 9, 2009 at 11:26 PM

Increasing taxes from 10% to 11%, is an increase of 10%.

MarkTheGreat on November 10, 2009 at 9:12 AM

nelsonknows on November 9, 2009 at 11:13 PM

MaximusConfessor used to post here as StOlaf, until he got himself banned.

MarkTheGreat on November 10, 2009 at 9:13 AM

Is Huck running or not?

I hope not.

spmat on November 10, 2009 at 9:14 AM

It’s just what people say when a woman is a competitor. We all know that.

The easiest way to dismiss a woman’s ideas is to make sure it’s all about her looks.

AnninCA on November 10, 2009 at 8:37 AM

Which is what your fellow Democrats did during the last campaign.

rbj on November 10, 2009 at 9:22 AM

Well, she is more attractive than Huck in a variety of ways.

joedoe on November 10, 2009 at 9:28 AM

Because he had another job being POTUS. Sarah Palin has been busy being President of Facebook, and that’s great, but most people could have found time to stay as Governor of Alaska as well.

Proud Rino on November 9, 2009 at 7:25 PM

You really need to sober up.

DanaSmiles on November 10, 2009 at 9:36 AM

Words cannot express how much I despise this “man.” Will someone PLEASE tell him to STFU!!!!!!!!!!

rockmom on November 9, 2009 at 7:05 PM

Will no one rid me of this meddlesome preacher?

Random Numbers (Brian Epps) on November 10, 2009 at 9:40 AM

Methinks the man doth protest too much.

There’s no question that Sarah Palin is attractive, and attractive people tend to get more media attention than others. It’s a natural tendency (jealousy, maybe?) for less-attractive people to believe that attractive people have things handed to them because of their beauty, and for opponents to somehow characterize all attractive people as somehow lacking in inteligence.

But if Mike Huckabee really wants to connect with people, why is he whining about Sarah Palin getting more media attention because she’s attractive? If he is truly worried about people labeling him as an “ignoramus”, why doesn’t he prove his smarts in a positive way, instead of spouting fodder for Sarah Palin’s critics? This doesn’t seem to be about Sarah Palin, but about Mike Huckabee’s bruised ego.

Sarah Palin is attractive, but she’s also a smart, self-made woman, who rose to be Governor of Alaska not on any man’s coattails, but by her own common sense, hard work, and determination. I still believe that it was a huge mistake for her to resign the Governorship of Alaska, but maybe she has chosen to be a kingmaker for her ideas instead of a “queen”.

Can Mike Huckabee do the same for his ideas? Or is beauty only skin-deep for him?

Steve Z on November 10, 2009 at 9:40 AM

Huck, Palin is getting more attention because she has balls, and you don’t.

Daggett on November 10, 2009 at 9:42 AM

Attractive is just a plus to all of the other good stuff she has to offer………… Go away Huckabuck……….

1luckydogg on November 10, 2009 at 9:42 AM

Please no Huckabee. If it’s between Palin and Huck, I’ll pick her—although I’m not convinced about her readiness for POTUS in 2012. Love she makes the left insane.

Renwaa on November 10, 2009 at 9:43 AM

Let’s be clear about the club for growth, when they are on our side they are ok and when they are not they suck.
They were for the comprehensive immigration bill and as long as they get there tax cuts the rest be damned.
Huck is proably the fronttunner for 2012, anybody notice how quiet romney has been? It is because he has to keep his head down during this healthcare debate because of his Mass health careexperiment. I don’t think Palin will run in 2012.
Huck is a very very petty little fellow but my bet is on him to be the canadate for 2012.
I hope Fred Thompson or Mike Pence runs to tell you the truth but I doubt it .

kangjie on November 10, 2009 at 9:50 AM

This is the second or third time in the last few months that Huckabee has taken a shot at Palin.

That tells you who he views as his biggest potential threat in the primaries.

And he’s right: she would destroy him. Palin would poach a big portion of Huckabee’s 2008 base; add to that her superstar drawing power and Huckabee would be DOA by Iowa.

Harpazo on November 10, 2009 at 9:52 AM

Huck mentions Sarah for the same reason everyone else in media and politics does – to get attention.

That’s the reason Time put the pic of Sarah on the cover of its dying and pathetically thin magazine a couple of months ago.

Huck has his own television show and he has to mention Sarah to make people do anything other than reflexively yawn.

He is an okay guy and his speech withdrawing from the primary was, by far, the best political speech of the 2008 campaign, but, after 2 gratuitous swipes at Sarah, it’s hard to view his continued sniping as anything other than envy and attempts to garner attention.

molonlabe28 on November 10, 2009 at 9:57 AM

Vyce on November 9, 2009 at 7:57 PM

Exercise for the Student of Political History:

1. Find a library with a good archive of past newspapers.

2. Search that archive in the 1976-1979 time-frame for references to Ronald Reagan.

3. Note how RR was branded a political lightweight by a vast majority of columnists.

4. Apply the lesson to today.

I am not saying Pain=Reagan, but she is certainly being treated like he was. It was not until he got out and spoke for himself that people started to realize the media snowjob, and he was careful in his timing as well.

In the current campaign environment, I expect Palin to ramp up very slowly through 2010 and start the blitz hard around May 2011.

Random Numbers (Brian Epps) on November 10, 2009 at 10:15 AM

Huckabigot hates women , hates attractive people and eats popcorn poppered squirrel . If nominated he would be saying , vote for me , at least I was born here and my parents on both sides were white devils .

borntoraisehogs on November 10, 2009 at 10:23 AM

Will no one rid me of this meddlesome preacher?

Random Numbers

lol , from Beckett? one of my favorites

beachgirlusa on November 10, 2009 at 10:29 AM

lol , from Beckett? one of my favorites

beachgirlusa on November 10, 2009 at 10:29 AM

It just POPEd in there. :P

Random Numbers (Brian Epps) on November 10, 2009 at 10:37 AM

I was shocked last year at the sexism in the Democratic primary. Blew me away.

However, I feel “seasoned” now. All women candidates on a national level must deal with this unfair focus on their looks. It simply won’t go away, no matter how often I complain about it or point out the sexism involved or try to shame people out of it.

It just will have to be ignored. The best approach is to recognize that it reflects the internal perspective of the person speaking. It reveals THEIR sexism, and it honestly doesn’t say much about the target at all.

And that goes for negative comments about women’s looks, too. Or their dang clothes, for heaven’s sakes.

AnninCA on November 10, 2009 at 10:41 AM

I know it’s still early, but if you keep insisting that the Republican choice comes down to Romney or Huckabee I will puke.

SKYFOX on November 10, 2009 at 10:49 AM

SKYFOX, you’re right, it is early. There is nothing wrong to speculate what is going to happen in the future as long as we always remember that the next presidential election is not until 2012 and the next election is not till Nov. 2010.

technopeasant on November 10, 2009 at 10:54 AM

Is Chucklebee more self absorbed and thin skinned than Obama?

bloviator on November 10, 2009 at 10:58 AM

I campaigned for Huckahu Ackbar during his first run for governor. Many from his former congregation told us he was NOT who we thought he was. However, after Clinton and Tucker we were desperate for anyone who at least appeared to have some morals, and was preaching the word of lowering taxes. Turns out the former congregation members were right!

If anyone cares, in particular you Huckabites, it would not take very long to uncover some scary skeletons in Huckahu Ackbar’s closet. It is called the internet and you can commence to digging any time. His wife and son have a few as well. The DNC will have a field day with this mess.

Dittos to one and all saying he would lose just like McCain. Dittos to all saying he is a RINO and super, mega dittos to what a slime ball the Huckster is overall in his demeaning another person’s faith, not getting out of the race when top Evangelicals begged him (prior to S.C. primary), his actions in West Virginia and basically for just being a political weasel.

In addition, I have a lot of respect for Phyllis Schlafly, and she once said the Huckster totally nuked Conservatives and the GOP in Arkansas. She has said a few other things not so positive about Huckahu Ackbar. I might add quite a large number of well know Evangelicals were very disgusted with his behavior during the primaries, and I would not count on them endorsing him over Sarah Palin. To inspire “broken glass” Conservatives to vote for any ticket you are going to need these Evangelical leaders support and encouragement to turn out for the candidate. Huckaschmuck, once all the airing is done, he will not inspire these much needed “broken glass” Conservatives.

He might for now have the female voters, but after these comments, if they are real women, WHAT A SEXIST PIG! This female voter looks forward to nuking his campaign at every turn. I will fight him with everything I have. HE WILL NOT BE POTUS!

freeus on November 10, 2009 at 10:58 AM

Why do you all hate Huckabee so much? He is as conservative as they get and he has alot of executive experience. He should really be a shoe in, instead “conservatives” try to talk up a proven fiscal and social liberal like Romney.

I really don’t get it.

JC Silverberg on November 10, 2009 at 10:59 AM

I was shocked last year at the sexism in the Democratic primary. Blew me away.

AnninCA on November 10, 2009 at 10:41 AM

I was shocked that there were some women – allegedly intelligent women – who believed that any criticism of a woman for whatever reason was automatically sexist. It actually re-enforced some of the actual sexism (e.g. Women can’t handle the job) because Hillary Clinton apparently expected to be treated specially because she was a woman.

Too many women want the benefits of being treated “equally” and then don’t want to ever be criticized. Can’t have it both ways.

Proud Rino on November 10, 2009 at 11:08 AM

No, Huck, here is the difference:

She governed her state as a conservative. You didn’t. ‘Nuff said.

evergreen on November 10, 2009 at 11:09 AM

Why do you all hate Huckabee so much? He is as conservative as they get and he has alot of executive experience. He should really be a shoe in, instead “conservatives” try to talk up a proven fiscal and social liberal like Romney.

I really don’t get it.

JC Silverberg on November 10, 2009 at 10:59 AM

None of the above, please.

evergreen on November 10, 2009 at 11:09 AM

Huckabee will never be able to get past his son and that dudes issues.

dingbat on November 10, 2009 at 11:11 AM

Mike Huckabee seems to be a nice person but his support for illegal aliens, including offering them FREE COLLEGE EDUCATIONS does not work for me.

Sarah Palin is far more interested, in actual Homeland Security. She is the real deal and has far more to offer than just a pretty face.

http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/17/i-dont-believe-mike-huckabee/

Huckabee video – In his own words:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbKA4HqjpeA

sinsing on November 10, 2009 at 11:12 AM

Is Chucklebee more self absorbed and thin skinned than Obama?

bloviator

He’s close.

beachgirlusa on November 10, 2009 at 11:17 AM

Exercise for the Student of Political History:

Random Numbers (Brian Epps) on November 10, 2009 at 10:15 AM

That same kind of exercise can be done for Mitt Romney. Remember that Ronald Reagan lost the 1976 election and came back in the 1980 election to win.

Ronald Reagan wasn’t perfect either. He originally supported abortion before opposing it. So did Romney.

The media wasn’t kind to Reagan and they haven’t been kind to Romney either.

The point is that your exercise could be done for any candidate like Romney, Huckabee or Palin.

Whats your point?

Conservative Samizdat on November 10, 2009 at 11:20 AM

Given that fiscal conservatives are the people Huck will have to win over to beat Romney, TNR calls this knock on CfG “the functional equivalent of Mitt Romney trashing evangelicals.” Exit question: Is Huck running or not?

We do not need another RINO in the mix and, despite all his populist and evangelical claims, Huckabee’s record is pure RINO and nothing but RINO.

For a lot of reasons, I don’t think Palin is the right candidate for the GOP in 2012 but Huckabee isn’t even fit to carry Palin’s bags.

highhopes on November 10, 2009 at 11:26 AM

It just POPEd in there. :P

Random Numbers

LOL

beachgirlusa on November 10, 2009 at 11:30 AM

Why do you all hate Huckabee so much? He is as conservative as they get and he has alot of executive experience. He should really be a shoe in, instead “conservatives” try to talk up a proven fiscal and social liberal like Romney.

I really don’t get it.

JC Silverberg on November 10, 2009 at 10:59 AM

Apparently you don’t if you think Huckabee is a conservative. He’s as socially liberal as they come; short of the worst excesses of the Democrat party. Romney is, in fact, to the right of Huckabee on both fiscal and social issues.

Most importantly for me, Huckabee and his campaign deliberately stirred up Mormon hatred to discredit Romney. That kind of intolerance is unforgivable since there is no litmus test for religion when it comes to the Presidency.

highhopes on November 10, 2009 at 11:30 AM

He’s close.

beachgirlusa on November 10, 2009 at 11:17 AM

I thought RINOs had thick skin. :-0

Seriously, I don’t get why Huckabee has so many supporters. He seems nice enough as a television host but his ideas and record are not consistent with what I want in a candidate. My latest mark against him is the lecture he gave against those who objected to the filthy lying coward’s photo-op at Dover AFB.

highhopes on November 10, 2009 at 11:34 AM

Now that’s just cruel and unfair.

There are tons of reasons I dislike Huckabee that have nothing to do with how he looks. Why is he dumping on his looks. Why not focus in his random jerkiness, his inability to take a stance without reading polls, his incessant whining, his attacking of conservatives and their ideals… I mean none of those have anything to do with his looks.

He needs to be fair to himself his appearance has no link to why I dislike him. Who he is, what he doesn’t, and what he seems to believe have much much more to do with it.

I wouldn’t trust his “leadership” to help find our way out of a hallway with the front door open. Again, still not related to his appearance at all.

gekkobear on November 10, 2009 at 11:41 AM

“He’s [Huckabee] as socially liberal as they come; short of the worst excesses of the Democrat party. Romney is, in fact, to the right of Huckabee on both fiscal and social issues.

What social issue would that be? Romney favored abortion and Huckabee has been vocal in his opposition against abortion.

JC Silverberg on November 10, 2009 at 11:42 AM

And to the guy who impugned on Huckabee for his son: What About Palin then, she is a failed mother of a teen slut. Could such a person really be trusted with high office according to your logic? Please be consistent!

JC Silverberg on November 10, 2009 at 11:45 AM

What About Palin then, she is a failed mother of a teen slut.

JC Silverberg on November 10, 2009 at 11:45 AM

Stay classy, JC.

Proud Rino on November 10, 2009 at 11:47 AM

Mike Huckabee is a petty little man. His jealousy of Palin is palpable and his passive-aggressive comments are getting old. But this is nothing new for him because he acted exactly the same way toward Romney in the primary. And then there was that religious bigotry thing he had against Mormons. Nice guy that Mike Huckabee *snort*.

Redneck Woman on November 10, 2009 at 11:50 AM

Seriously, I don’t get why Huckabee has so many supporters.
highhopes

Because some assume that any candidate who is a preacher is surely sent from God, therefore he is automatically qualified to be president.

He’s anti-abortion and anti-gay marriage so thereby God has conferred on him the qualifications needed to be president.

And all those who dare reject his views are false teachers, devils in disguise trying to sway the innocent flock with lies and deceit. After all, they aren’t even Christians, they just think they are and in truth they are the anti-christ.

Just my opinion.

beachgirlusa on November 10, 2009 at 11:53 AM

Can I get a hallelujah amen!

beachgirlusa on November 10, 2009 at 11:55 AM

Hallelujiah and amen!

Percy_Peabody on November 10, 2009 at 11:56 AM

, ‘Hey, wait a minute. She’s wonderful, but the only difference was she looks better in stilettos than I do, and she has better hair.’

Uh, that’s two differences, Mr. Huckabee.

And Dr. Emmet Brown could tell you in a second why Ronald Reagan the actor managed to become President of the United States.

unclesmrgol on November 10, 2009 at 12:00 PM

What About Palin then, she is a failed mother of a teen slut.

JC Silverberg on November 10, 2009 at 11:45 AM

Ah, but is she a failed mother now?

We all fail at these types of things, particularly when our failure is related to what another person does or does not do — my son used marijauana and was expelled from college, and that makes me, by your light, a failed father and my wife a failed mother. He did this in spite of living in a drug free house and having seen what a drug (alcohol) can do to a beloved family member.

Well good upon it, but my son has kicked his habit, is maintaining a 3.9 average at his new college (far cry from 0.0 at the old one), and — is back in the game. So, by that measure, we are also successful parents as well.

You are welcome to your criticism, but it is petty.

unclesmrgol on November 10, 2009 at 12:06 PM

And Dr. Emmet Brown could tell you in a second why Ronald Reagan the actor managed to become President of the United States.

unclesmrgol on November 10, 2009 at 12:00 PM

Does it have something to do with the flux capacitor?

Proud Rino on November 10, 2009 at 12:06 PM

Well who doesn’t hate mormons? I thought every sane person did, just like with the scientologists and muslims. Remember that the ORIGINAL 9/11 was the date ot the Mountain Meadow massacre – 120 innocents dead at the hands of the mormon militia. Better Obama than Romney as president I say.

JC Silverberg on November 10, 2009 at 12:06 PM

unclesmrgol

Yeah, you are right, but you are not (I assume) seeking the presidency of the United States. If you did your past failures would be relevant, as it is now, they are not.

JC Silverberg on November 10, 2009 at 12:09 PM

Palin is not a failed mother. Having a baby at 18 is not the worst thing that can happen to a person, and having a kid out of wedlock isn’t either. All of Sarah Palin’s kids seem to be nice, law-abiding people, and her son is a Marine, isn’t he? Sounds like a good group. I’d be proud of them of I were her.

Proud Rino on November 10, 2009 at 12:10 PM

Well who doesn’t hate mormons? I thought every sane person did, just like with the scientologists and muslims. Remember that the ORIGINAL 9/11 was the date ot the Mountain Meadow massacre – 120 innocents dead at the hands of the mormon militia. Better Obama than Romney as president I say.

JC Silverberg on November 10, 2009 at 12:06 PM

Romney wasn’t involved in the Mountain Meadow Massacre, and I think any sane person doesn’t hate anybody because of their religious affiliation, regardless of whether they’re Mormon, Muslim or Scientologist.

Proud Rino on November 10, 2009 at 12:12 PM

Well I do hate them and I am sane. I have that on paper. The doctor jsut said it was an alternate sanity, but that everyone’s sanity is equally good.

JC Silverberg on November 10, 2009 at 12:17 PM

What people don’t get about Sarah Palin is that she was just such a wonderful surprise. People outside of Alaska really didn’t know anything (or at least not much) about her. She came out onto that stage and she was attractive (actually even foxy), she was articulate, she was forceful and she was genuine. So many of these politicos are so wooden and rehearsed, too afraid of failing to allow themselves to be (or at least seem) spontaneous. All of it worked: the lovely family, the eldest son set to deploy, etc. When I first heard that LameCain had chosen the governor of Alaska as his running mate, I was ticked, complaining to my hubby, ‘why didn’t he pick someone from a state with a lot of electoral votes, someone who could HELP him?’ Then I heard that first speech and saw the reaction of the crowd. I was moved like everyone else and I’ve been a (cautiously optimistic) fan ever since. Sarah Palin has that ability to come across as a real person not just another reanimated corpse.

cynccook on November 10, 2009 at 12:24 PM

JC Silverberg on November 10, 2009 at 11:45 AM
Heeeere, trolly, trolly. Here’s some nice rancid rat meat for you. HEEEEEAAAAAAVVVVEEEEEE. There, now chase that over to Liberalland.com like a good little troll.

cynccook on November 10, 2009 at 12:25 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6