<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is this the high-water mark for ObamaCare?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:45:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: For AMA, Partial Support Doesn’t Mean a Whole Endorsement : Smart Girl Nation</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2937978</link>
		<dc:creator>For AMA, Partial Support Doesn’t Mean a Whole Endorsement : Smart Girl Nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2937978</guid>
		<description>[...] There’s a difference between liking aspects of something and endorsing its entirety.  Consider a restaurant with a convenient location and ample parking that serves crummy food, or a conservative who had to force herself to vote for John McCain, and you get the drift.  That sums up the American Medical Association’s relationship with H.R. 3962, better known as the nearly 2,000-page behemoth Nancy Pelosi shoved through the House of Representatives Saturday evening. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There’s a difference between liking aspects of something and endorsing its entirety.  Consider a restaurant with a convenient location and ample parking that serves crummy food, or a conservative who had to force herself to vote for John McCain, and you get the drift.  That sums up the American Medical Association’s relationship with H.R. 3962, better known as the nearly 2,000-page behemoth Nancy Pelosi shoved through the House of Representatives Saturday evening. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerricho68</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2931840</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerricho68</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2931840</guid>
		<description>What is a single payer system? Is that where master pays for everything?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is a single payer system? Is that where master pays for everything?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dthorny</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2930221</link>
		<dc:creator>dthorny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2930221</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Would like to ask the ‘bleeding hearts’, how many of them would borrow buckets of their own money to give to the poor if it meant ruin?

Starlink on November 9, 2009 at 12:20 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

 Funny how the libs attack the conservatives as non-caring when it&#039;s the LIBS WHO DO NOT GIVE SQUAT TO THE POOR.

 Obama&#039;s tax returns:

 http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2008/03/obama-releases.html

 A true bastion of giving he is. What happened to HIS REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH?

Compare to Dick Cheney: The Cheneys donated $321,141 to charity in 2003.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Would like to ask the ‘bleeding hearts’, how many of them would borrow buckets of their own money to give to the poor if it meant ruin?</p>
<p>Starlink on November 9, 2009 at 12:20 PM</p></blockquote>
<p> Funny how the libs attack the conservatives as non-caring when it&#8217;s the LIBS WHO DO NOT GIVE SQUAT TO THE POOR.</p>
<p> Obama&#8217;s tax returns:</p>
<p> <a href="http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2008/03/obama-releases.html" rel="nofollow">http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2008/03/obama-releases.html</a></p>
<p> A true bastion of giving he is. What happened to HIS REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH?</p>
<p>Compare to Dick Cheney: The Cheneys donated $321,141 to charity in 2003.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dthorny</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2930164</link>
		<dc:creator>dthorny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2930164</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;He became exactly what he claims to rail against; An elitist snob and GOP insider.

What a shame.

True_King on November 8, 2009 at 8:30 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Another liberal troll.

Next time repeat this phrase a thousand times a day: &quot;I was a liberal until 10 months of Obama&#039;s failed policies with 2 trillion more debt, DOUBLED unemployment rate, jailing those who don&#039;t buy Gov&#039;t MANDATED health insurance (the politburo have their own, thank you very much), more homeland terrorist attacks as Obama does nothing, OUR ELECTED president ATTACKS the only media outlet who wants him accountable as the rest of the lamestream suck up, MORE of the world hate the US, Russia, Iran and China spit in our faces, the democrats have destroyed the only freedom loving country in the world for communism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>He became exactly what he claims to rail against; An elitist snob and GOP insider.</p>
<p>What a shame.</p>
<p>True_King on November 8, 2009 at 8:30 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Another liberal troll.</p>
<p>Next time repeat this phrase a thousand times a day: &#8220;I was a liberal until 10 months of Obama&#8217;s failed policies with 2 trillion more debt, DOUBLED unemployment rate, jailing those who don&#8217;t buy Gov&#8217;t MANDATED health insurance (the politburo have their own, thank you very much), more homeland terrorist attacks as Obama does nothing, OUR ELECTED president ATTACKS the only media outlet who wants him accountable as the rest of the lamestream suck up, MORE of the world hate the US, Russia, Iran and China spit in our faces, the democrats have destroyed the only freedom loving country in the world for communism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerricho68</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2930128</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerricho68</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2930128</guid>
		<description>Can 1 Senator truly hold this bill up forever?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can 1 Senator truly hold this bill up forever?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweet_Thang</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2929523</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweet_Thang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2929523</guid>
		<description>High water mark indeed!

&lt;strong&gt;Is that like when a clogged toilet overflows to a certain point, then starts to recede?&lt;/strong&gt;

Solution: let&#039;s all keep plunging until it all goes away, like bad nightmare!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High water mark indeed!</p>
<p><strong>Is that like when a clogged toilet overflows to a certain point, then starts to recede?</strong></p>
<p>Solution: let&#8217;s all keep plunging until it all goes away, like bad nightmare!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marklmail</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2929176</link>
		<dc:creator>marklmail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2929176</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;There are also those who claim that our reform effort will insure illegal immigrants,&quot; Obama said. &quot;This, too, is false — the reforms I’m proposing would not apply to those who are here illegally.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Obama said thie prior to joe wilson&#039;s &quot;you lie&quot; comment. Sooooo,???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There are also those who claim that our reform effort will insure illegal immigrants,&#8221; Obama said. &#8220;This, too, is false — the reforms I’m proposing would not apply to those who are here illegally.</p></blockquote>
<p>Obama said thie prior to joe wilson&#8217;s &#8220;you lie&#8221; comment. Sooooo,???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The One Year War - RealQuiet&#8217;s blog - RedState</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2928570</link>
		<dc:creator>The One Year War - RealQuiet&#8217;s blog - RedState</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2928570</guid>
		<description>[...] November 8th at 10:53PM EST  No Comments    Ed Morrissey beautifully illustrates the task ahead here.  As we all know, the House passed the Pelosi/Obamacare abomination late last night. The lynch pin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] November 8th at 10:53PM EST  No Comments    Ed Morrissey beautifully illustrates the task ahead here.  As we all know, the House passed the Pelosi/Obamacare abomination late last night. The lynch pin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starlink</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2928499</link>
		<dc:creator>Starlink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2928499</guid>
		<description>This is not the high water mark of liberalism.

Unfortunately, they will buy off Snowe and whomever else to pass it.  In the end, it will have whatever they want in it.

Tragically, Republicans got us into this mess, and even if they sweep in 2010, they never repeal anything, (see Social Security or Medicare), regardless of how damaging.

Dark days indeed.

Would like to ask the &#039;bleeding hearts&#039;, how many of them would borrow buckets of their own money to give to the poor if it meant ruin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not the high water mark of liberalism.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, they will buy off Snowe and whomever else to pass it.  In the end, it will have whatever they want in it.</p>
<p>Tragically, Republicans got us into this mess, and even if they sweep in 2010, they never repeal anything, (see Social Security or Medicare), regardless of how damaging.</p>
<p>Dark days indeed.</p>
<p>Would like to ask the &#8216;bleeding hearts&#8217;, how many of them would borrow buckets of their own money to give to the poor if it meant ruin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: workingforpigs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2928497</link>
		<dc:creator>workingforpigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2928497</guid>
		<description>these people disgust me. we need a list of all of these criminals that voted for this bill so they can be voted out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>these people disgust me. we need a list of all of these criminals that voted for this bill so they can be voted out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reaction to House Bill Vote &#8211; Blog Watch</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2928432</link>
		<dc:creator>Reaction to House Bill Vote &#8211; Blog Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2928432</guid>
		<description>[...] Hot Air&#8217;s Ed Morrissey: &#8220;We always thought the fight was in the Senate, so the only real surprise yesterday was how weak Pelosi actually was on ObamaCare.  Our focus now has to shift to those red-state Senators who will have to explain to voters their potential support of a bill that imposes unconstitutional mandates and trillions of dollars in new costs on a government that can’t pay its bills now.  And in this case, we’ll only need two of them to stop the runaway tyranny of the Democratic agenda.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hot Air&#8217;s Ed Morrissey: &#8220;We always thought the fight was in the Senate, so the only real surprise yesterday was how weak Pelosi actually was on ObamaCare.  Our focus now has to shift to those red-state Senators who will have to explain to voters their potential support of a bill that imposes unconstitutional mandates and trillions of dollars in new costs on a government that can’t pay its bills now.  And in this case, we’ll only need two of them to stop the runaway tyranny of the Democratic agenda.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; Peolosi Democrats: Where Ideology Trumps Democracy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2928408</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; Peolosi Democrats: Where Ideology Trumps Democracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2928408</guid>
		<description>[...] why did she do it?  Perhaps the bill&#8217;s narrow passage is, as Ed Morrissey speculates &#8220;the high-water mark for ObamaCare.&#8221;  If Democrats didn&#8217;t push it now, the bill would stand even less chance of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] why did she do it?  Perhaps the bill&#8217;s narrow passage is, as Ed Morrissey speculates &#8220;the high-water mark for ObamaCare.&#8221;  If Democrats didn&#8217;t push it now, the bill would stand even less chance of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bloggless</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2928050</link>
		<dc:creator>bloggless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2928050</guid>
		<description>Rosa DeLauro
Phone: 202-225-3661
Fax: 202-225-4890

&lt;strong&gt;Wouldn&#039;t it be interesting to call this Pro-abortion Congresswoman and ask her why she voted for HR 3269 when it goes against pro-choice ideology. Talk about selling women down the river.  &lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rosa DeLauro<br />
Phone: 202-225-3661<br />
Fax: 202-225-4890</p>
<p><strong>Wouldn&#8217;t it be interesting to call this Pro-abortion Congresswoman and ask her why she voted for HR 3269 when it goes against pro-choice ideology. Talk about selling women down the river.  </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockmom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2927954</link>
		<dc:creator>rockmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2927954</guid>
		<description>Joe Lieberman is from Connecticut, where as many as 500,000 jobs depend on the insurance business.  He can see exactly what this House bill will produce - another Fannie Mae that will underprice private providers, take over their markets, and run them out of business.  

This is not going to end up with a single-payer government-run health care system; it will end up with the insurance system collapsing just like the financial system did in 2008, with another trillion dollars in bailouts of the insurance companies and bankruptcy of the public plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Lieberman is from Connecticut, where as many as 500,000 jobs depend on the insurance business.  He can see exactly what this House bill will produce &#8211; another Fannie Mae that will underprice private providers, take over their markets, and run them out of business.  </p>
<p>This is not going to end up with a single-payer government-run health care system; it will end up with the insurance system collapsing just like the financial system did in 2008, with another trillion dollars in bailouts of the insurance companies and bankruptcy of the public plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: molonlabe28</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2927945</link>
		<dc:creator>molonlabe28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2927945</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that Harry Reid will be a US Senator in 15 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that Harry Reid will be a US Senator in 15 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: englishqueen01</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2927753</link>
		<dc:creator>englishqueen01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2927753</guid>
		<description>Oh, and some more news to help dispel any cases of &quot;the Mondays&quot;.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/11/08/ap-obamas-glow-healthcare-triumph-over-bill-doa-senate&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;From the AP (yes, the AP!), via Newsbusters: (emphasis mine)&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;&lt;strong&gt;The glow from a health care triumph faded &lt;/strong&gt;quickly for President Barack Obama on Sunday as Democrats realized the bill they fought so hard to pass in the House has &lt;strong&gt;nowhere to go in the Senate&lt;/strong&gt;.&quot;

...

The problem is that &lt;strong&gt;the Senate won&#039;t run with it&lt;/strong&gt;. The government health insurance plan included in the House bill is &lt;strong&gt;unacceptable to a few Democratic moderates who hold the balance of power in the Senate.&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;If a government plan is part of the deal, &quot;as a matter of conscience, I will not allow this bill to come to a final vote&lt;/strong&gt;,&quot; said &lt;strong&gt;Sen. Joe Lieberman&lt;/strong&gt;, the Connecticut independent whose vote Democrats need to overcome GOP filibusters.

&quot;&lt;strong&gt;The House bill is dead on arrival in the Senate&lt;/strong&gt;,&quot; Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said dismissively.

&lt;strong&gt;Democrats did not line up to challenge him&lt;/strong&gt;. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has yet to schedule floor debate and hinted last week that &lt;strong&gt;senators may not be able to finish health care this year&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Yipeee!!!!  Sen. Lieberman has really started to earn my respect.  Dems threw him under the bus over the war in Iraq; isn&#039;t payback sweet?


KILL THE BILL! KILL THE BILL! KILL THE BILL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and some more news to help dispel any cases of &#8220;the Mondays&#8221;.  <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/11/08/ap-obamas-glow-healthcare-triumph-over-bill-doa-senate" rel="nofollow">From the AP (yes, the AP!), via Newsbusters: (emphasis mine)</a></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;<strong>The glow from a health care triumph faded </strong>quickly for President Barack Obama on Sunday as Democrats realized the bill they fought so hard to pass in the House has <strong>nowhere to go in the Senate</strong>.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>The problem is that <strong>the Senate won&#8217;t run with it</strong>. The government health insurance plan included in the House bill is <strong>unacceptable to a few Democratic moderates who hold the balance of power in the Senate.</strong></p>
<p><strong>If a government plan is part of the deal, &#8220;as a matter of conscience, I will not allow this bill to come to a final vote</strong>,&#8221; said <strong>Sen. Joe Lieberman</strong>, the Connecticut independent whose vote Democrats need to overcome GOP filibusters.</p>
<p>&#8220;<strong>The House bill is dead on arrival in the Senate</strong>,&#8221; Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said dismissively.</p>
<p><strong>Democrats did not line up to challenge him</strong>. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has yet to schedule floor debate and hinted last week that <strong>senators may not be able to finish health care this year</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yipeee!!!!  Sen. Lieberman has really started to earn my respect.  Dems threw him under the bus over the war in Iraq; isn&#8217;t payback sweet?</p>
<p>KILL THE BILL! KILL THE BILL! KILL THE BILL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: englishqueen01</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2927612</link>
		<dc:creator>englishqueen01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2927612</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Pelosi shouted “Allahu Akbar” when the voting finished.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Heh.  The only thing tolerable in Islam is that they don&#039;t believe in abortion, either, so Pelosi&#039;s just as likely to invoke Allah as I am to be the actual queen of England.

Also, I am a recovering liberal.  So I know all the stupid talking points and arguments.  I can tell you that, for a fact, they are not based in rational, logical thought.  It&#039;s 100% pure emotion, with a dash of moral relativism thrown in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Pelosi shouted “Allahu Akbar” when the voting finished.</p></blockquote>
<p>Heh.  The only thing tolerable in Islam is that they don&#8217;t believe in abortion, either, so Pelosi&#8217;s just as likely to invoke Allah as I am to be the actual queen of England.</p>
<p>Also, I am a recovering liberal.  So I know all the stupid talking points and arguments.  I can tell you that, for a fact, they are not based in rational, logical thought.  It&#8217;s 100% pure emotion, with a dash of moral relativism thrown in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cybergeezer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2927593</link>
		<dc:creator>Cybergeezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2927593</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pelosi shouted &quot;Allahu Akbar&quot; when the voting finished.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pelosi shouted &#8220;Allahu Akbar&#8221; when the voting finished.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: englishqueen01</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2927582</link>
		<dc:creator>englishqueen01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2927582</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Recall that the illustrious AG Holder is hiring folks to stir up trouble and spy. If you must feed the trolls, use the hungry alligators. Love your posts, EQ! FREEDOM!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thank you.

If I had the money, I would run for office.  Probably against our senators - Feingold and Kohl.  I can guarantee you I wouldn&#039;t vote for legislation like this.

It&#039;s time politics was returned to the hands of the common folk.  You know, I&#039;m studying to be a teacher and have to present a lesson on &lt;em&gt;To Kill a Mockingbird&lt;/em&gt;, in re-reading it, I realized that well into the 20th century, politicians did not &quot;do&quot; politics as a full time job in most cases.  It was part-time work and they had other jobs outside the halls of government.

I think it&#039;s time we returned to that system.  I guarantee you if the Pelosi&#039;s of the world had to make their actual living competing in the free market, they 1) wouldn&#039;t have all this extra time to figure out how to control our lives and 2) wouldn&#039;t be socialists.

Just a suggestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Recall that the illustrious AG Holder is hiring folks to stir up trouble and spy. If you must feed the trolls, use the hungry alligators. Love your posts, EQ! FREEDOM!</p></blockquote>
<p>Thank you.</p>
<p>If I had the money, I would run for office.  Probably against our senators &#8211; Feingold and Kohl.  I can guarantee you I wouldn&#8217;t vote for legislation like this.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time politics was returned to the hands of the common folk.  You know, I&#8217;m studying to be a teacher and have to present a lesson on <em>To Kill a Mockingbird</em>, in re-reading it, I realized that well into the 20th century, politicians did not &#8220;do&#8221; politics as a full time job in most cases.  It was part-time work and they had other jobs outside the halls of government.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s time we returned to that system.  I guarantee you if the Pelosi&#8217;s of the world had to make their actual living competing in the free market, they 1) wouldn&#8217;t have all this extra time to figure out how to control our lives and 2) wouldn&#8217;t be socialists.</p>
<p>Just a suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flutejpl</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2927524</link>
		<dc:creator>flutejpl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2927524</guid>
		<description>On this anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, which, note well that Obama, Reid, and Pelosi *aren&#039;t* attending, here&#039;s hoping that bloody Saturday is in fact the high water mark.  We need to take a page from Walesa&#039;s Solidarnosc and other movements that led to the great triumph of 20 years ago.

Healthcare reform is just a mask covering a fever-pitched move toward a totalitarian regime in spite of our Constitution.  We cannot rely on the Supreme Court to get this matter right, even though perhaps they would be another effective last line of defense.  More people have to mobilize against this tyranny!  No, this isn&#039;t a call to arms, but it is a call to feet.  1.7M people on 9/12 evidently didn&#039;t lend enough feet to get the message across to our leaders.  When the Pope got involved with Walesa in the 1980s and it became clear that 3+M people had prayed and sent help to Solidarnosc, only then did Russia, helmed by linguini-spined Gorbachev, start caving.

That 3+M number is roughly equal to 10% of Poland&#039;s population.  The most favorable estimates on the 9/12 tea party equal just 0.6% of our population.  No wonder they didn&#039;t listen!!!  There&#039;s a problem there, folks.  Obama, Reid, and Pelosi may be a whole bunch of things, but weak in willingness to use (and abuse) their power is not one of them, I&#039;m afraid... unlike Gorbachev.

We need an overwhelming voter revolution 51 weeks from now to cripple this Tyranny in the House and give us breathing room in the Senate.  Nevada, you have to send Harry Reid a clear welcome home signal.  Red Staters, you have to either compel your Democratic senators to change their thinking and switch sides, or dump them next November, even if they&#039;ve been good to you.    Their choosing to caucus with a philosophically bankrupt party is reason enough to vote against them.

To save ourselves until then, we need ever-increasing numbers descending upon DC.  1.7M won&#039;t cut it.  I know I am one to talk; I haven&#039;t gone yet.  Saturday was my tipping point, though.  If another 9/12-like event gets organized, chances are I&#039;ll be getting onto I-95 and taking a car full of friends with me.  Ideally, it will be coordinated across the country like the last one, and all of our city centers will get overwhelmed.  Here&#039;s hoping that, across all events, 10M show up next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On this anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, which, note well that Obama, Reid, and Pelosi *aren&#8217;t* attending, here&#8217;s hoping that bloody Saturday is in fact the high water mark.  We need to take a page from Walesa&#8217;s Solidarnosc and other movements that led to the great triumph of 20 years ago.</p>
<p>Healthcare reform is just a mask covering a fever-pitched move toward a totalitarian regime in spite of our Constitution.  We cannot rely on the Supreme Court to get this matter right, even though perhaps they would be another effective last line of defense.  More people have to mobilize against this tyranny!  No, this isn&#8217;t a call to arms, but it is a call to feet.  1.7M people on 9/12 evidently didn&#8217;t lend enough feet to get the message across to our leaders.  When the Pope got involved with Walesa in the 1980s and it became clear that 3+M people had prayed and sent help to Solidarnosc, only then did Russia, helmed by linguini-spined Gorbachev, start caving.</p>
<p>That 3+M number is roughly equal to 10% of Poland&#8217;s population.  The most favorable estimates on the 9/12 tea party equal just 0.6% of our population.  No wonder they didn&#8217;t listen!!!  There&#8217;s a problem there, folks.  Obama, Reid, and Pelosi may be a whole bunch of things, but weak in willingness to use (and abuse) their power is not one of them, I&#8217;m afraid&#8230; unlike Gorbachev.</p>
<p>We need an overwhelming voter revolution 51 weeks from now to cripple this Tyranny in the House and give us breathing room in the Senate.  Nevada, you have to send Harry Reid a clear welcome home signal.  Red Staters, you have to either compel your Democratic senators to change their thinking and switch sides, or dump them next November, even if they&#8217;ve been good to you.    Their choosing to caucus with a philosophically bankrupt party is reason enough to vote against them.</p>
<p>To save ourselves until then, we need ever-increasing numbers descending upon DC.  1.7M won&#8217;t cut it.  I know I am one to talk; I haven&#8217;t gone yet.  Saturday was my tipping point, though.  If another 9/12-like event gets organized, chances are I&#8217;ll be getting onto I-95 and taking a car full of friends with me.  Ideally, it will be coordinated across the country like the last one, and all of our city centers will get overwhelmed.  Here&#8217;s hoping that, across all events, 10M show up next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angryed</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2927483</link>
		<dc:creator>angryed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2927483</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Selkirk on November 9, 2009 at 8:29 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And it&#039;s even more compounded than that. Say I have insurance on Jan 1. I lose my job on Jan 2. I get a new job on Jan 4. I went Jan 2 - 4 without health insurance. Guess what? I&#039;m part of the 47 million with &quot;NO HEALTH INSURANCE&quot;. And so is my wife and so is my kids. Boom, 3 people withoutinsurance because we went 24 hours without it.

That&#039;s how the number is counted. Anyone who goes for any period of time in a given year without insurance is deemed insuranceless. Doesn&#039;t matter if it&#039;s for a day or for 349.9 days of the year.

And my example is a sort of true story. I quit my job on a Friday, started a new one on Monday. I went without insurance for the weekend. And how many people do that every year? Or college students who go for a few weeks without insurance between the time they graduate and lose their parents&#039; coverage and start their first job with insurance? 

When you break it down to the number of people who want and cannot afford insurance for more than 30 days, I don&#039;t know if the number is even 10 million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Selkirk on November 9, 2009 at 8:29 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>And it&#8217;s even more compounded than that. Say I have insurance on Jan 1. I lose my job on Jan 2. I get a new job on Jan 4. I went Jan 2 &#8211; 4 without health insurance. Guess what? I&#8217;m part of the 47 million with &#8220;NO HEALTH INSURANCE&#8221;. And so is my wife and so is my kids. Boom, 3 people withoutinsurance because we went 24 hours without it.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s how the number is counted. Anyone who goes for any period of time in a given year without insurance is deemed insuranceless. Doesn&#8217;t matter if it&#8217;s for a day or for 349.9 days of the year.</p>
<p>And my example is a sort of true story. I quit my job on a Friday, started a new one on Monday. I went without insurance for the weekend. And how many people do that every year? Or college students who go for a few weeks without insurance between the time they graduate and lose their parents&#8217; coverage and start their first job with insurance? </p>
<p>When you break it down to the number of people who want and cannot afford insurance for more than 30 days, I don&#8217;t know if the number is even 10 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angryed</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2927468</link>
		<dc:creator>angryed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2927468</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little late to enjoy our newest troll&#039;s rantings. I will say this. Anyone who uses the phrase &quot;per anum&quot;, like our good troll friend JC, is automatically relegated to  douche status in my book.

Carry on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little late to enjoy our newest troll&#8217;s rantings. I will say this. Anyone who uses the phrase &#8220;per anum&#8221;, like our good troll friend JC, is automatically relegated to  douche status in my book.</p>
<p>Carry on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Selkirk</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2927437</link>
		<dc:creator>Selkirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2927437</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;to fix a 13% problem&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Let&#039;s not give credence to the Democratic demagoguery by repeating it.  The number of involuntarily uninsured Americans (key words: &lt;em&gt;involuntarily &lt;/em&gt;and &lt;em&gt;Americans&lt;/em&gt;) is far less than 13%, and the number shrinks even more when you remove short-term unemployed people (do we really need to spend over a trillion dollars to insure people who will be getting insurance of their own in the next 2-3 months?).

The only reason why there is a growing number of people without health insurance is the still-increasing unemployment rate.  Perhaps, then, the focus should be on fixing that problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>to fix a 13% problem</p></blockquote>
<p>Let&#8217;s not give credence to the Democratic demagoguery by repeating it.  The number of involuntarily uninsured Americans (key words: <em>involuntarily </em>and <em>Americans</em>) is far less than 13%, and the number shrinks even more when you remove short-term unemployed people (do we really need to spend over a trillion dollars to insure people who will be getting insurance of their own in the next 2-3 months?).</p>
<p>The only reason why there is a growing number of people without health insurance is the still-increasing unemployment rate.  Perhaps, then, the focus should be on fixing that problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pcoop</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2927391</link>
		<dc:creator>Pcoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2927391</guid>
		<description>wake up people, we&#039;re Venezuela now. The hierarchy is in place and it&#039;s not going anywhere.

I doubt that even 2010 can change anything because all President Camacho&#039;s gotta do is make the millions of illegal aliens citizens and then it&#039;s easy street for him. 
Hugo Chavez did the same thing before one of his eariler re-election campaigns. 

The government&#039;s not going anywhere. It&#039;s in place now and it&#039;s hear to stay.

Just pray that there will be enough sunglasses for everyone so who wish to can see the truth soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wake up people, we&#8217;re Venezuela now. The hierarchy is in place and it&#8217;s not going anywhere.</p>
<p>I doubt that even 2010 can change anything because all President Camacho&#8217;s gotta do is make the millions of illegal aliens citizens and then it&#8217;s easy street for him.<br />
Hugo Chavez did the same thing before one of his eariler re-election campaigns. </p>
<p>The government&#8217;s not going anywhere. It&#8217;s in place now and it&#8217;s hear to stay.</p>
<p>Just pray that there will be enough sunglasses for everyone so who wish to can see the truth soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Man</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/08/is-this-the-high-water-mark-for-obamacare/comment-page-5/#comment-2927390</link>
		<dc:creator>B Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71827#comment-2927390</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a regular Rush listener, I can listen to him for about 20-30 mins or so then it&#039;s on to something else, and that&#039;s about once a week or month, but there&#039;s NO way the guy is an elitist or GOP insider or snob.

For one he likes Palin.   Can&#039;t be an elitist and like her, you just can&#039;t.

He is mostly spot on regarding Obama - which is why the admin is so terrified of him.  
He&#039;s not my fav guy but he&#039;s no GOP insider or elitist snob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a regular Rush listener, I can listen to him for about 20-30 mins or so then it&#8217;s on to something else, and that&#8217;s about once a week or month, but there&#8217;s NO way the guy is an elitist or GOP insider or snob.</p>
<p>For one he likes Palin.   Can&#8217;t be an elitist and like her, you just can&#8217;t.</p>
<p>He is mostly spot on regarding Obama &#8211; which is why the admin is so terrified of him.<br />
He&#8217;s not my fav guy but he&#8217;s no GOP insider or elitist snob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
