Unemployment hits 10.2%

posted at 8:53 am on November 6, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

Unemployment hit double digits for the first time in 26 years as more than 558,000 lost jobs in October.  The jobless rate went from 9.8% to 10.2%, a leap that quadruples the increase from August to September and indicates a rapidly-worsening situation for American workers:

The unemployment rate rose from 9.8 to 10.2 percent in October, and nonfarm payroll employment continued to decline (-190,000), the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The largest job losses over the month were in construction, manufacturing, and retail trade.

In October, the number of unemployed persons increased by 558,000 to 15.7 million. The unemployment rate rose by 0.4 percentage point to 10.2 percent, the highest rate since April 1983. Since the start of the recession in December 2007, the number of unemployed persons has risen by 8.2 million, and the unemployment rate has grown by 5.3 percentage points. (See table A-1.)

Among the major worker groups, the unemployment rates for adult men (10.7 percent) and whites (9.5 percent) rose in October. The jobless rates for adult women (8.1 percent), teenagers (27.6 percent), blacks (15.7 percent), and Hispanics (13.1 percent) were little changed over the month. The unemployment rate for Asians was 7.5 percent, not seasonally adjusted. (See tables A-1, A-2, and A-3.)

The number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks and over) was little changed over the month at 5.6 million. In October, 35.6 percent of unemployed persons were jobless for 27 weeks or more. (See table A-9.)

The civilian labor force participation rate was little changed over the month at 65.1 percent. The employment-population ratio continued to decline in October, falling to 58.5 percent. (See table A-1.)

The job losses accelerated in manufacturing.  The average losses in the previous four months was 51,000 per month, but October beat that by 10,000, coming in at 61,000 jobs lost.  Construction lost 62,000 in October, down slightly from the 4-month average of 67,000.  Retail lost 40,000 jobs — and that may be a very bad portent for the Christmas season, which usually accounts for about 30% of all retail sales.

Yesterday’s productivity numbers foreshadowed this result.  Productivity hit decade-long highs last quarter, and I asked King Banaian what that meant:

UPDATE: Ed Morrissey asks via email whether this has any portent for unemployment? I think it does. The investment in equipment and software may be either of a deepening or broadening variety. If you are dumping many workers you can also cut your capital budget. But if that category turns around while you are still cutting workers — the ADP projection for private sector payrolls is a loss of 203,000 jobs, above the consensus forecast of -175,000 overall jobs — that would suggest capital deepening. I think this is what’s driving increased productivity. This also means each new worker now comes with a higher “capital budget requirement”, and between that and the payroll taxes contemplated under Pelosicare you probably have a greater drag on employment than otherwise contemplated.

While these data are for the third and tomorrow’s report is for the first month of Q4, I am inclined to think we will see both a number closer to 200k for jobs lost. That might make the unemployment rate 10%.

The breaking of the psychological barrier of double-digit unemployment is a watershed moment for the Obama administration.  It has continued to claim success in its Porkulus effort with shell-game “saved or created” metrics for jobs while unemployment rises unabated.  Meanwhile, Obama pushed Congress to spend trillions of dollars we don’t have on efforts that have nothing to do with employment or revitalizing the economy.  Even the latest CNN poll shows a 17-point swing to the worse for Obama on economics.

This is now Obama’s economy.  He owns the double-digit unemployment level, having bought it with the $787 billion stimulus plan that he promised would keep unemployment no higher than 8%.

Update: From the AP:

But the loss of jobs last month exceeded economists’ estimates. It’s the 22nd straight month the U.S. economy has shed jobs, the longest on records dating back 70 years.

Counting those who have settled for part-time jobs or stopped looking for work, the unemployment rate would be 17.5 percent, the highest on records dating from 1994.

Update II: Mark Tapscott calls this “a leading indicator Obama policies must change.”

Update III: Innocent Bystanders updates the Romer graph once again:

Be sure to read their roundup, too.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

The Redhead’s back with a vengeance.

CBP on November 6, 2009 at 8:54 AM

What’s the problem here ???

Just more people with more time on their hands to have fun……..that’s a godd thing, right ???

Jerome Horwitz on November 6, 2009 at 8:55 AM

*good*

Jerome Horwitz on November 6, 2009 at 8:55 AM

Its Bush’s fault!/

becki51758 on November 6, 2009 at 8:55 AM

Yes, but think of the 558,000,000,000,000,000 jobs saved or created!

rbj on November 6, 2009 at 8:55 AM

Hows that Hope and Change working out for ya Charlie Crist.
Florida’s is 11% and our taxes are going higher.

Nelsa on November 6, 2009 at 8:56 AM

WE SAVED THE ECONOMY. – Rahm Emmanuel (D)

Good Lt on November 6, 2009 at 8:56 AM

Congress just extended unemployment benefits as well, which is nice for the people struggling to find a job, but will bump the U3 unemployment numbers even higher.

BadgerHawk on November 6, 2009 at 8:56 AM

This is not good. I keep waiting for the other shoe to drop.

Mord on November 6, 2009 at 8:57 AM

Nancy Pelosi: “This is good news for us.”

doctormom on November 6, 2009 at 8:57 AM

10.2 is racist.

LibTired on November 6, 2009 at 8:58 AM

Remember… It’s Funemployment… Make no mistake about it, this IS Obama’s plan… Create an emergency that forces Americans to make a False Moral choice. That choice will be to accept unconstitutional government control over our lives.

doriangrey on November 6, 2009 at 8:58 AM

The recession is OVER!!!!! They must have missed the memo.

deidre on November 6, 2009 at 8:58 AM

Funemployment!

bighead4 on November 6, 2009 at 8:58 AM

The Redhead’s back with a vengeance.
CBP on November 6, 2009 at 8:54 AM

LOL! If only Ed would give her a portion of Hot Air’s phenomenal profits for using her pic so much, maybe unemployement would go down to 10.1999999%!

KS Rex on November 6, 2009 at 8:59 AM

WE SAVED THE ECONOMYCRISIS, NEVER LET A GOOD ONE GO TO WASTE. – Rahm Emmanuel (D)

Good Lt on November 6, 2009 at 8:56 AM

the_nile on November 6, 2009 at 9:00 AM

More BS. Shadowstats calculates the real unemployment numbers using the the method used in the 70′s and 80′s. Try 20%. And if you believe inflation is only 5%, you’re a fool.

hogfat on November 6, 2009 at 9:01 AM

WE SAVED THE ECONOMY. – Rahm Emmanuel (D)

Good Lt on November 6, 2009 at 8:56 AM

Yes, and by saved Rahm means, from Capitalism and from recovering…

doriangrey on November 6, 2009 at 9:01 AM

Obama Rewards Young Voters With More Leisure Time as Youth Unemployment Soars http://optoons.blogspot.com/2009/09/obama-rewards-young-voters-with-more.html

Mervis Winter on November 6, 2009 at 9:02 AM

Between the Joooooz, the Hondurans and George Bush, Obama just get can’t get a break. Its tough being perfect when the world is made up of so much cr*p.

johnsteele on November 6, 2009 at 9:02 AM

Remember… It’s Funemployment… Make no mistake about it, this IS Obama’s plan… Create an emergency that forces Americans to make a False Moral choice. That choice will be to accept unconstitutional government control over our lives.

doriangrey on November 6, 2009 at 8:58 AM

I’ve never understood the theory that this is all intentional. I’m not saying it is or it isn’t. Not even God knows what the hell is going on inside the heads of Obama and Pelosi. I’m just asking what the logic is behind that. If unemployment continues to climb, how can the government take advantage of the situation and exert more control over our lives? They won’t have enough tax revenue to function.

Doughboy on November 6, 2009 at 9:02 AM

Malaise or Mustard with that sandwich?

blatantblue on November 6, 2009 at 9:02 AM

But how many moms have gone back to school?

artist on November 6, 2009 at 9:03 AM

This is just a racist distraction from passing Obamacare.

Darksean on November 6, 2009 at 9:03 AM

Win-win for the Dems. More unemployment simply means a larger pool of free-market victims to whom to redistribute what others have earned.

Track-A-'Crat on November 6, 2009 at 9:03 AM

Democrat strategists must be in a bind here. Do they want the unemployment story to divert attention from Fort Hood, or the other way round?

My feeling is that Fort Hood is the easier one for the media to spin, so the Whitehouse and the MSM will focus on it, and talk up the ‘stress’ and ‘harassment’ line.

EnglishMike on November 6, 2009 at 9:03 AM

Congress just extended unemployment benefits as well, which is nice for the people struggling to find a job, but will bump the U3 unemployment numbers even higher.

BadgerHawk on November 6, 2009 at 8:56 AM

I wonder if any of those people went to welfare already? I did everything in my power not to go to welfare while I was out of a job for 11 months. Thankfully, I got a job in July, right before my wife and I were actually thinking about applying for welfare.

MobileVideoEngineer on November 6, 2009 at 9:03 AM

What private business is going to hire with this far left jackass in the White House and with the current Congress?

Democrats apparently believe people are hired out of benovolence, like when Nancy Pelosi hired her butler, maid, gardner, corn massager and chamberpot tender.

Who will hire when it’s still an unknown what burdens health care “reform”, Cap and Tax and Card Check will put upon them?

Business hates uncertainty.

And this fiasco of a government perpetuated by incompetent, corrupt Democrats, is unstable on every level possible.

NoDonkey on November 6, 2009 at 9:04 AM

I wanna give a shout out to…

To the man who’s destroying our economy and way of life.

Come on, let’s give it up for…

Barack Hussein Obama. Way to go, man.

TXUS on November 6, 2009 at 9:04 AM

Combined with the NJ and Virginia elections, a 10.2 % unemployment rate may get Blue Dog Democrats and RINOS to realize we have a false prophet in the White House who cannot rescue them during the mid-term elections. Consequently this may torpedo-Pelosi-Obama Care, if not in the House, at least the Senate.

MaiDee on November 6, 2009 at 9:04 AM

This is just overwhelmingly sad. The man child and his cronies have managed to drive our economy into the toilet and the masses that watch his gov’t media outlets don’t even realize it.

I knew the left was going to over reach with thier imaginary “mandate”, but I never thought they’de achieve such a level of idiocy so quickly.

anniekc on November 6, 2009 at 9:04 AM

Where’s the Sheriff!?! Joe, fix this quick!

DrStock on November 6, 2009 at 9:04 AM

The Obama team needs to come up with a new metric: Jobs created or destroyed. This way the numbers can always go higher, without having to resort to fuzzy math.

EMD on November 6, 2009 at 9:05 AM

Unemployment hit double digits for the first time in 26 years

Can anyone here refresh my memory? Who was President 26 years ago?

crr6 on November 6, 2009 at 9:05 AM

I’ve never understood the theory that this is all intentional. I’m not saying it is or it isn’t. Not even God knows what the hell is going on inside the heads of Obama and Pelosi. I’m just asking what the logic is behind that. If unemployment continues to climb, how can the government take advantage of the situation and exert more control over our lives? They won’t have enough tax revenue to function.

Doughboy on November 6, 2009 at 9:02 AM

Study up on Marxism/Communism, it will give you the answers to understand the strategy. Basically they have to destroy the economy in order for the government to confiscate private companies and private property.

doriangrey on November 6, 2009 at 9:05 AM

They should have an unemployment sub-plot in ‘V’ along with the healthcare story:

“We have come to save you humans from the slavery of work by destroying your jobs…”

EnglishMike on November 6, 2009 at 9:06 AM

I want to know how the “Local Residents make $63 per hour” people on the ads to the right of this box do it?? It says all they need is a computer. Maybe they send e-mails to people for that poor unfortunate African man that wants to get his $10 million he has coming from his government and all the poor man needs is you bank account number, to send YOU the money that you two can split.

Jeff from WI on November 6, 2009 at 9:06 AM

Since most Americans think the economy and jobs are the number one issue at hand, and not health care, a smart administration would put aside the boondoggle bill and start addressing unemployment like they mean it. No?

scalleywag on November 6, 2009 at 9:06 AM

Employment is racist.

bighead4 on November 6, 2009 at 9:06 AM

BOOOOOOOOSSSH!!!!

/White House press briefing preview

Pablo on November 6, 2009 at 9:06 AM

Can anyone here refresh my memory? Who was President 26 years ago?

crr6 on November 6, 2009 at 9:05 AM

Wow, it’s going to be a long day for libs if this is all they have in their arsenal.

MobileVideoEngineer on November 6, 2009 at 9:06 AM

I’m really beginning to hate that red head.

Jeff from WI on November 6, 2009 at 9:07 AM

Oh and one last observation before I run off to work… That redhead… IS ONE SMOKING HOT MOMMA…

doriangrey on November 6, 2009 at 9:07 AM

Can anyone here refresh my memory? Who was President 26 years ago?

crr6 on November 6, 2009 at 9:05 AM

Wow, it’s going to be a long day for libs if this is all they have in their arsenal.

MobileVideoEngineer on November 6, 2009 at 9:06 AM

LOL…yup…pathetic

Jeff from WI on November 6, 2009 at 9:08 AM

HOPE AND FREAKIN CHANGE baby!

HoosierCon on November 6, 2009 at 9:08 AM

I’ve never understood the theory that this is all intentional. I’m not saying it is or it isn’t. Not even God knows what the hell is going on inside the heads of Obama and Pelosi. I’m just asking what the logic is behind that. If unemployment continues to climb, how can the government take advantage of the situation and exert more control over our lives? They won’t have enough tax revenue to function.

Doughboy on November 6, 2009 at 9:02 AM

See Cloward-Piven.

Pablo on November 6, 2009 at 9:08 AM

Can’t wait to see Obama and friends spin 10.2

BPD on November 6, 2009 at 8:32 AM

They’re going to remind you who was President in 1983. Guaranteed.

LibTired on November 6, 2009 at 8:49 AM

From another thread, somebody already guessed your diversion tactic.

CBP on November 6, 2009 at 9:08 AM

Ed..has anyone counted those green jobs???

Dire Straits on November 6, 2009 at 9:08 AM

I’m really beginning to hate that red head.

Jeff from WI on November 6, 2009 at 9:07 AM

I feel her pain.

Pablo on November 6, 2009 at 9:09 AM

Oh and one last observation before I run off to work… That redhead… IS ONE SMOKING HOT MOMMA…

doriangrey on November 6, 2009 at 9:07 AM

Really? I usually like red heads but I don’t much care for her. She actually looks kind of b@tchy

Jeff from WI on November 6, 2009 at 9:09 AM

Ed..has anyone counted those green jobs???

Dire Straits on November 6, 2009 at 9:08 AM

Green jobs?? The illegal Mexicans working for the landscaping company?

Jeff from WI on November 6, 2009 at 9:10 AM

But hey spending 1.whatever trillion on a health care bill no one wants is more important.

Does anybody in Washington know what they are doing?

gophergirl on November 6, 2009 at 9:11 AM

The largest job losses over the month were in construction, manufacturing, and retail trade.

But…I thought contruction, manufacturing, and retail sections of the economy are all improving?

uknowmorethanme on November 6, 2009 at 9:11 AM

Can anyone here refresh my memory? Who was President 26 years ago?

Well, there you go again…..

You know, the “Let’s blame Bush” excuse has worn out, so I guess this is the new libtard talking point.

Jerome Horwitz on November 6, 2009 at 9:11 AM

All together now:

I blame Bush

/Obama

NoFanofLibs on November 6, 2009 at 9:11 AM

Oh and one last observation before I run off to work… That redhead… IS ONE SMOKING HOT MOMMA…

doriangrey on November 6, 2009 at 9:07 AM

That’s right, rub your job in the face of unemployed like me.
;)
Red heads are fine but I never liked curly hair.

RagTag on November 6, 2009 at 9:11 AM

Memo to the redhead: you should have stuck with Charlie Brown.

jwolf on November 6, 2009 at 9:11 AM

Are the American people and the private sector ‘goin Galt’?

Sapwolf on November 6, 2009 at 9:12 AM

10.2%!

Are we going to be now told to “get used to it…”

Is the intent to actually shed jobs and create dependence. My congressman posted on his website what a victory it was to say that he fought hard for an extension of unemployment benefits. He was actually excited about that. If he thinks that’s a victory, then it’s a Pyrrhic one. One would think that actually creating actual live, paying jobs would be a greater victory instead of having to extend unemployment benefits–that’s simply idiotic.

ted c on November 6, 2009 at 9:12 AM

Can’t wait to see Obama and friends spin 10.2

BPD on November 6, 2009 at 8:32 AM

They’re going to remind you who was President in 1983. Guaranteed.

LibTired on November 6, 2009 at 8:49 AM

Unemployment hit double digits for the first time in 26 years

Can anyone here refresh my memory? Who was President 26 years ago?

crr6 on November 6, 2009 at 9:05 AM

From another thread, somebody already guessed your diversion tactic.

Forgot a link

CBP on November 6, 2009 at 9:12 AM

Post Stimulus Stress Disorder

bighead4 on November 6, 2009 at 9:13 AM

U-6 is 17.5%

flyfisher on November 6, 2009 at 9:13 AM

Congress just extended unemployment benefits as well, which is nice for the people struggling to find a job, but will bump the U3 unemployment numbers even higher.

BadgerHawk on November 6, 2009 at 8:56 AM

Well I hope I can get some of it but I doubt it.

RagTag on November 6, 2009 at 9:13 AM

Lindsey Graham: “The green economy is coming”!!111!11!

SouthernGent on November 6, 2009 at 9:13 AM

mm. mm. mm.

maynila on November 6, 2009 at 9:13 AM

See Cloward-Piven.

Pablo on November 6, 2009 at 9:08 AM

I understand what you’re saying. I read that before the election last year. And it does tie into Rahm and Hillary saying they should never let a good crisis go to waste.

But maybe I’m just too logical to comprehend how this can possibly work. If they intentionally tank the economy and destroy the private sector, how will the government be able to efficiently come in save the day? They require tax revenue from the private sector in order to operate.

Oh and there’s one other little hurdle. It’s called an election. We just had one and it was a disaster for the Democrats. Another is less than a year away. And a lot more will be at stake in that one. How exactly can they continue to enact their radical agenda(whatever it may be), if this scheme of theirs costs them their power in 2010?

Doughboy on November 6, 2009 at 9:14 AM

ted c on November 6, 2009 at 9:12 AM

Which Congressman?

nwsseeker on November 6, 2009 at 9:14 AM

Wow, it’s going to be a long day for libs if this is all they have in their arsenal.

MobileVideoEngineer on November 6, 2009 at 9:06 AM

Oh there’s plenty more, unemployment is a lagging indicator, and the economy grew at 3.5% in the 3rd quarter (the largest increase in 2 years) etc.

But I though the little Reagan reminder strike a nerve : )

crr6 on November 6, 2009 at 9:14 AM

Is this what is considered, “bringing the economy back from the brink”???

How many more children are going to the “toys for tots” bin this year now? A million, 3 million?

ted c on November 6, 2009 at 9:14 AM

HOPE AND FREAKIN CHANGE baby!

HoosierCon on November 6, 2009 at 9:08 AM

I am left with only loose Change after Dear Leader was elected. And he might tax that as well.

nyx on November 6, 2009 at 9:14 AM

Bush should be placed on trial for treason for what he is doing to our country today.

Loxodonta on November 6, 2009 at 9:15 AM

nwsseeker on November 6, 2009 at 9:14 AM

perriello D -VA 5

ted c on November 6, 2009 at 9:15 AM

10.2%? It was only supposed to hit 9.9 this month.

jhffmn on November 6, 2009 at 9:15 AM

Can anyone here refresh my memory? Who was President 26 years ago?

crr6 on November 6, 2009 at 9:05 AM

Bush?

ClassicCon on November 6, 2009 at 9:15 AM

i asked

malaise or mustard with your ham sandwich

WHY DID NO ONE LOL?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

blatantblue on November 6, 2009 at 9:15 AM

This is not true. His Highness said no higher than 8%.

Wade on November 6, 2009 at 9:16 AM

RagTag on November 6, 2009 at 9:11 AM

Hope the best for you. And curly hair is not all that bad. :)

nyx on November 6, 2009 at 9:16 AM

The really tragic part of this is that the unemployment rates for Blacks and young people are sky high. That’s Obama’s base, and that’s how he rewards them. “Funemployment” indeed!

jwolf on November 6, 2009 at 9:16 AM

Really? I usually like red heads but I don’t much care for her. She actually looks kind of b@tchy

Jeff from WI on November 6, 2009 at 9:09 AM

Can you blame her? She’s been standing in line for a job for what seems like a year. :-)

Doughboy on November 6, 2009 at 9:17 AM

Here in PA, the state is looking at slashing 400 jobs in the Environmental Protection Agency. These are state jobs. The workers will find out on Monday who is getting the hatchet. A note on the desk, two hours to leave.

I’m not sure about other agencies, but this is one that I’ve heard about. Even with the stimulus money going into the state coffers, we can’t keep state jobs. And guess what party our Governor belongs to? I’ll give you a hint, it comes after the letter “C”. Thankfully we’ll be done with Rendell soon.

CBP on November 6, 2009 at 9:18 AM

I think these two headlines say everything that needs to be said about Obama’s presidency: “Ft. Hood suspect reportedly shouted `Allahu Akbar’” and “Jobless rate tops 10 pct. for first time since ’83″. We have a domestic terrorist attack and the people are suffering because there are no jobs to be had all under Obama’s watch. When are the people going to put down the Koolaid and wake up and smell the coffee?

suburbanite on November 6, 2009 at 9:18 AM

jwolf on November 6, 2009 at 9:16 AM

I voted for Obama and all I got was funemployment.
Has a great ring to it.

nyx on November 6, 2009 at 9:18 AM

The really tragic part of this is that the unemployment rates for Blacks and young people are sky high. That’s Obama’s base, and that’s how he rewards them. “Funemployment” indeed!

jwolf on November 6, 2009 at 9:16 AM

Maybe cousin “Pookie” called him out by staying home or crossing over Tuesday.

SouthernGent on November 6, 2009 at 9:18 AM

Obama and team can’t even cook the books in a timely manner.

joedoe on November 6, 2009 at 9:18 AM

WHY DID NO ONE LOL?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
blatantblue on November 6, 2009 at 9:15 AM

Everyone’s upset about Ft. Hood, this crap, Pelosi, Healthcare Reform, and the Narcissist-in-chief, Kiddo.
Our Trolls went above and beyond pure slime on the Ft. Hood Thread and they all deserve the Ban Hammer today. We’ll get better.

kingsjester on November 6, 2009 at 9:20 AM

Our Big Government has released their faux unemployment numbers again. The truth is that unemployment is more like 20%­± with this most recent bump.

They cook the books. Whatever our Big Government releases as the unemployment rate, double it, then you’ll have the true figure.

If you are incapable of Dazzling ‘em with Brilliance; Baffle ‘em with Bull$hit! -Barackus Hubris Maximus *hail casear*

.

SilverStar830 on November 6, 2009 at 9:20 AM

We must pass Obamacare now to save our economy.

Then we have to stop using all petrochemicals to stimulate growth in the green sector.

Then borrow a few more trillion to stimulate growth in the pork industry.

It’s for the children.

Loxodonta on November 6, 2009 at 9:20 AM

Reap it, Obama. You earned this legacy. Choke on it.

I think this number may finally swing the majority of the remaining independents who voted for this dolt and the other Democract/liberal dolts in Congress. You’d have to be stupid to vote for these imbeciles again or to consider any of their inept ideas.

Actually, this could cinch the Obamacare bill, as well. Silver linings, I guess.

ICBMMan on November 6, 2009 at 9:20 AM

kingsjester on November 6, 2009 at 9:20 AM

oh i know
just being a moron

what’d the trolls do this time?

i missed it

blatantblue on November 6, 2009 at 9:21 AM

Obama and team can’t even cook the books in a timely manner.

joedoe on November 6, 2009 at 9:18 AM

You do have a point. Incompetent corruption: an epitaph for the Obama administration.

jwolf on November 6, 2009 at 9:21 AM

Really? I usually like red heads but I don’t much care for her. She actually looks kind of b@tchy

Jeff from WI on November 6, 2009 at 9:09 AM

Can you blame her? She’s been standing in line for a job for what seems like a year. :-)

Doughboy on November 6, 2009 at 9:17 AM

LOL..but she started out looking that way. She won’t impress HR people or a possible new boss with that winning..er..ah…smile I guess.

Jeff from WI on November 6, 2009 at 9:21 AM

ted c on November 6, 2009 at 9:15 AM

Thank you, I’ve heard a little about him. Am I right in thinking he’s a liberal Dem?

nwsseeker on November 6, 2009 at 9:21 AM

The Redhead’s back with a vengeance.

CBP on November 6, 2009 at 8:54 AM

..with a monstor cell phone bill!

VoyskaPVO on November 6, 2009 at 9:22 AM

“Lagging indicator”?

A) Whatever happened to “jobless recovery” that the NYTimes and its ilk tried to push for years during the Bush administration. You know, the time when unemployment was ~5%.

B) Why is the unemployment rate trending upwards? That’s 0.4% over last month? If a recovery is on and job recovery “lags”, then shouldn’t the rate be decreasing?

c) Why am I trying to reason with a troll?

Techie on November 6, 2009 at 9:22 AM

Without the stimulus it would be 114% by now.

mankai on November 6, 2009 at 9:22 AM

…the unemployment rate would be 17.5 percent, the highest on records dating from 1994.

And you wonder why they’re pushing this movie right about now.

Chaz706 on November 6, 2009 at 9:22 AM

Obama doesn’t “own” squat.

And don’t you forget it.

tree hugging sister on November 6, 2009 at 9:22 AM

Oh, let me guess…UNEXPECTEDLY???

hoosiermama on November 6, 2009 at 9:23 AM

It will be spun as Bush’s fault.

Pelosi will say that we need to pass healthcare to save jobs.

texasconserv on November 6, 2009 at 9:23 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4