<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Graph of the Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:46:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy valtrax.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-3020022</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy valtrax.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 06:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-3020022</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Buy valtrax....&lt;/strong&gt;

Buy valtrax....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Buy valtrax&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Buy valtrax&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Axeman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2926852</link>
		<dc:creator>Axeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2926852</guid>
		<description>I have consistently said that this is a recession WITHOUT a stimulus package. All government spending, even spending to magnify the amount of government paperwork by a factor of 30, would provide some amount of &quot;stimulus&quot; as it would employ programmers to integrate the new &quot;virtual&quot; forms into existing programs and re-engineer databases. As well as producing orders for paper companies and printers--etc. 

Everything I saw in the stimulus bill was no more stimulating than any bill requiring new resources to be allocated would be. We wouldn&#039;t call the above bill a &quot;stimulus&quot; bill, but a reform bill of some form--so I don&#039;t call the Feb 2009 bill a &quot;stimulus package&quot; most of it when to the public sector to one-time contract services and materials from the private sector. Plus although the government can spend for construction in the middle of a recession, new construction for private businesses, who have to make revenue before building, is undertaken when the recovery is &lt;em&gt;assured&lt;/em&gt;, and inventories are low and new demand justifies investment. 

There was no more stimulus to the economy than any normal spending bill passed by Congress. Not a stimulus bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have consistently said that this is a recession WITHOUT a stimulus package. All government spending, even spending to magnify the amount of government paperwork by a factor of 30, would provide some amount of &#8220;stimulus&#8221; as it would employ programmers to integrate the new &#8220;virtual&#8221; forms into existing programs and re-engineer databases. As well as producing orders for paper companies and printers&#8211;etc. </p>
<p>Everything I saw in the stimulus bill was no more stimulating than any bill requiring new resources to be allocated would be. We wouldn&#8217;t call the above bill a &#8220;stimulus&#8221; bill, but a reform bill of some form&#8211;so I don&#8217;t call the Feb 2009 bill a &#8220;stimulus package&#8221; most of it when to the public sector to one-time contract services and materials from the private sector. Plus although the government can spend for construction in the middle of a recession, new construction for private businesses, who have to make revenue before building, is undertaken when the recovery is <em>assured</em>, and inventories are low and new demand justifies investment. </p>
<p>There was no more stimulus to the economy than any normal spending bill passed by Congress. Not a stimulus bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elderberry</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2920513</link>
		<dc:creator>elderberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2920513</guid>
		<description>This &quot;should be&quot; the most pressing issue for the Administration.
This &quot;is&quot; the most pressing issue for Americans according to the exit
polls.  The media needs to beat this drum every time some one from the White House shows up on a Sunday morning show  but unlikely that will happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This &#8220;should be&#8221; the most pressing issue for the Administration.<br />
This &#8220;is&#8221; the most pressing issue for Americans according to the exit<br />
polls.  The media needs to beat this drum every time some one from the White House shows up on a Sunday morning show  but unlikely that will happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unclesmrgol</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2920070</link>
		<dc:creator>unclesmrgol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2920070</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Could one of the people complaining about the “dishonesty” of the graph, make an “honest” one?

Chris_Balsz on November 6, 2009 at 10:37 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

To make an honest one, you&#039;d have to substitute two other trend lines for Obama&#039;s guesses in white and grey.

So, you leave the red line (which is reality), and you put another line in showing the aggregate amount of inflated dollars from the stimulus inflicted upon the economy.

You could have a green line reflecting automobile sales, and a yellow line reflecting home sales, and a cyan line representing foreclosures.

Our economy&#039;s health is best represented by the turnover in large durable goods such as cars and houses.

What is most interesting about the red line is the slope, which, aside from the anomaly in June/July, is almost constantly 10/11, One hopes it will level off soon, or in about 9.2 years we will all be unemployed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Could one of the people complaining about the “dishonesty” of the graph, make an “honest” one?</p>
<p>Chris_Balsz on November 6, 2009 at 10:37 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>To make an honest one, you&#8217;d have to substitute two other trend lines for Obama&#8217;s guesses in white and grey.</p>
<p>So, you leave the red line (which is reality), and you put another line in showing the aggregate amount of inflated dollars from the stimulus inflicted upon the economy.</p>
<p>You could have a green line reflecting automobile sales, and a yellow line reflecting home sales, and a cyan line representing foreclosures.</p>
<p>Our economy&#8217;s health is best represented by the turnover in large durable goods such as cars and houses.</p>
<p>What is most interesting about the red line is the slope, which, aside from the anomaly in June/July, is almost constantly 10/11, One hopes it will level off soon, or in about 9.2 years we will all be unemployed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unclesmrgol</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2920062</link>
		<dc:creator>unclesmrgol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 07:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2920062</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;DaveS on November 6, 2009 at 4:52 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I do not think Mr. Obama has the power you think he does -- at least not in June.  Just &lt;i&gt;mentioning&lt;/i&gt; healthcare caused a knee in the curve?

No, I figured it out.  The beginning of June is when I began buying my 4th of July fireworks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>DaveS on November 6, 2009 at 4:52 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I do not think Mr. Obama has the power you think he does &#8212; at least not in June.  Just <i>mentioning</i> healthcare caused a knee in the curve?</p>
<p>No, I figured it out.  The beginning of June is when I began buying my 4th of July fireworks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notropis</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2920003</link>
		<dc:creator>notropis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2920003</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Chris_Balsz on November 6, 2009 at 10:37 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://michaelscomments.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/stimulus-vs-unemployment-october-dots.gif&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; is a lot more honest.

Not as slick, granted, but more honest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Chris_Balsz on November 6, 2009 at 10:37 PM</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://michaelscomments.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/stimulus-vs-unemployment-october-dots.gif" rel="nofollow">This</a> is a lot more honest.</p>
<p>Not as slick, granted, but more honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharkface</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2919991</link>
		<dc:creator>sharkface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 05:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2919991</guid>
		<description>you could put the dow jones right on top of that graph and it&#039;d show a pretty strong correlation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you could put the dow jones right on top of that graph and it&#8217;d show a pretty strong correlation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2ipa</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2919704</link>
		<dc:creator>2ipa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2919704</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;How much longer will Congress allow that red line to run before recalling what’s left of Porkulus?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think it&#039;s obvious by now that they are &quot;all in&quot; on Porkulus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>How much longer will Congress allow that red line to run before recalling what’s left of Porkulus?</p></blockquote>
<p>I think it&#8217;s obvious by now that they are &#8220;all in&#8221; on Porkulus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris_Balsz</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2919683</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris_Balsz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2919683</guid>
		<description>Could one of the people complaining about the &quot;dishonesty&quot; of the graph, make an &quot;honest&quot; one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could one of the people complaining about the &#8220;dishonesty&#8221; of the graph, make an &#8220;honest&#8221; one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chickasaw42</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2919662</link>
		<dc:creator>chickasaw42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2919662</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;MSM headlines next November--- 60 Democrat representatives were &lt;em&gt;unexpectedly&lt;/em&gt; voted out of office by an electorate throwing a tantrum!&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>MSM headlines next November&#8212; 60 Democrat representatives were <em>unexpectedly</em> voted out of office by an electorate throwing a tantrum!</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kralizec</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2919235</link>
		<dc:creator>Kralizec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 01:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2919235</guid>
		<description>The graph makes important points, but it would do so more clearly and honestly if the Y-axis started at 0% instead of 7%.  On the other hand, calling the &quot;stimulus&quot; as swindle seems entirely accurate and well worthwhile.  The GOP would be foolish not to blame the Democrats publicly for throwing hundreds of billions of dollars to their constituencies without a clear economic rationale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The graph makes important points, but it would do so more clearly and honestly if the Y-axis started at 0% instead of 7%.  On the other hand, calling the &#8220;stimulus&#8221; as swindle seems entirely accurate and well worthwhile.  The GOP would be foolish not to blame the Democrats publicly for throwing hundreds of billions of dollars to their constituencies without a clear economic rationale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stimulus Swindle &#171; Palmetto Conservative</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2919234</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stimulus Swindle &#171; Palmetto Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 01:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2919234</guid>
		<description>[...] Stimulus&#160;Swindle By palmettoconservative  Hotair.com provides an excellent graph on the Stimulus&#8217; expected results v. actual results, courtesy of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stimulus&nbsp;Swindle By palmettoconservative  Hotair.com provides an excellent graph on the Stimulus&#8217; expected results v. actual results, courtesy of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklyn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2919229</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2919229</guid>
		<description>It has to be understood that the stimulus package had nothing to do with the economy. It was as known, a spending package to get funding for democratic projects that otherwise would not get on their own.  Not having a lick of sense on economics, they assumed that like previous recessions; it would pull itself back up and they could take credit for reviving the economy and debate their greed and gains against higher taxes later. They did managed quiet well at defecting the fact that they created the current economic crises with forcing leaders to make the unsecured loans that collectively brought the entire worlds economy to the ground. They failed to make that connection, and still do, that there is a reason some people own homes and property and others rent.  
It also needs to be understood that a healthy economy does not provide the needed opportunity to move away from capitalism to Socialism. The worse the economy is, the better the possibility for the socialist and communist to achieve that goal.
It needs to be understood that socialism is not about the people or providing what is needed to everyone. It is about power and those who have control being able to use as they deem beneficial to them or other elites and politicals that they favor.
It needs to be understood that a nationalized healthcare law is not about healthcare, but about taking control of a government and the people by the elite socialist and politicals. Socialized medicine is the vehicle to allow them access into every corner of private lives, government and business. Once socialism is established, it then becomes possible for a united socialist government such as the UN and its self described  mandate to become the seat of a world government.
It needs to be understood that Obama has mixed loyalties, instilled and drilled into him from before he could walk, and they are not to the people or to the nation. His are to the socialist and communist and as it becomes more apparent with each event through his inaction or distancing from the appearance of being condemning of actions; Islam, his native religion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has to be understood that the stimulus package had nothing to do with the economy. It was as known, a spending package to get funding for democratic projects that otherwise would not get on their own.  Not having a lick of sense on economics, they assumed that like previous recessions; it would pull itself back up and they could take credit for reviving the economy and debate their greed and gains against higher taxes later. They did managed quiet well at defecting the fact that they created the current economic crises with forcing leaders to make the unsecured loans that collectively brought the entire worlds economy to the ground. They failed to make that connection, and still do, that there is a reason some people own homes and property and others rent.<br />
It also needs to be understood that a healthy economy does not provide the needed opportunity to move away from capitalism to Socialism. The worse the economy is, the better the possibility for the socialist and communist to achieve that goal.<br />
It needs to be understood that socialism is not about the people or providing what is needed to everyone. It is about power and those who have control being able to use as they deem beneficial to them or other elites and politicals that they favor.<br />
It needs to be understood that a nationalized healthcare law is not about healthcare, but about taking control of a government and the people by the elite socialist and politicals. Socialized medicine is the vehicle to allow them access into every corner of private lives, government and business. Once socialism is established, it then becomes possible for a united socialist government such as the UN and its self described  mandate to become the seat of a world government.<br />
It needs to be understood that Obama has mixed loyalties, instilled and drilled into him from before he could walk, and they are not to the people or to the nation. His are to the socialist and communist and as it becomes more apparent with each event through his inaction or distancing from the appearance of being condemning of actions; Islam, his native religion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama&#8217;s Stimulus Swindle &#124; The Proud Profiteer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2919193</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama&#8217;s Stimulus Swindle &#124; The Proud Profiteer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 01:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2919193</guid>
		<description>[...] again to HotAir. I always pick up good info [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] again to HotAir. I always pick up good info [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris_Balsz</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2919155</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris_Balsz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 01:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2919155</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;While i’ll admit the money being spent on job creation is being done in a less than ideal manner…was there another option?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah.
Don&#039;t spend it.
Have 10% unemployment and a stronger dollar.

&lt;blockquote&gt; It was clear that, in the wake of the financial meltdown, free capital wasn’t going to create jobs and growth in the short term. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

So, destroy the dollar? Because that&#039;s what shovelling currency out a helicopter does.
The &quot;alternative&quot; was not to do it.

&lt;blockquote&gt;We can argue at the margins over whether it coulda been less here or more there (and lets not forget the stimulus was 1/2 TAX CUTS), &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Excuse me. A tax cut is a reduction in the rate at which the federal government exacts revenue from personal or coporate income, or, the elimination of a federal exaction altogether.  So if there is no income, a tax cut provides exactly no benefit.

Rebates for homebuying, cash for clunkers, etc., are NOT tax cuts.  They are welfare for doing something.  Even if your costs to do it zeroed out, and you made no profit, you still get the goodies.

Now, what&#039;s the percentage of tax cuts in the stimulus again?

&lt;blockquote&gt;but I find it hard to believe that the unemployment rate is a direct result of failed Obama policy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Meaning a trillion dollar increase had no direct effect on the economy?  Really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>While i’ll admit the money being spent on job creation is being done in a less than ideal manner…was there another option?</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah.<br />
Don&#8217;t spend it.<br />
Have 10% unemployment and a stronger dollar.</p>
<blockquote><p> It was clear that, in the wake of the financial meltdown, free capital wasn’t going to create jobs and growth in the short term. </p></blockquote>
<p>So, destroy the dollar? Because that&#8217;s what shovelling currency out a helicopter does.<br />
The &#8220;alternative&#8221; was not to do it.</p>
<blockquote><p>We can argue at the margins over whether it coulda been less here or more there (and lets not forget the stimulus was 1/2 TAX CUTS), </p></blockquote>
<p>Excuse me. A tax cut is a reduction in the rate at which the federal government exacts revenue from personal or coporate income, or, the elimination of a federal exaction altogether.  So if there is no income, a tax cut provides exactly no benefit.</p>
<p>Rebates for homebuying, cash for clunkers, etc., are NOT tax cuts.  They are welfare for doing something.  Even if your costs to do it zeroed out, and you made no profit, you still get the goodies.</p>
<p>Now, what&#8217;s the percentage of tax cuts in the stimulus again?</p>
<blockquote><p>but I find it hard to believe that the unemployment rate is a direct result of failed Obama policy.</p></blockquote>
<p>Meaning a trillion dollar increase had no direct effect on the economy?  Really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justltl</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2918898</link>
		<dc:creator>justltl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2918898</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Where can I get some of these stimulus funds? I’ll make up some liberal sounding program and just wait for the government checks to start rolling in.

Jeff from WI on November 6, 2009 at 5:05 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Do you know how to find housing for pimps and prostitutes?
I think there&#039;s big grant $$ available for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Where can I get some of these stimulus funds? I’ll make up some liberal sounding program and just wait for the government checks to start rolling in.</p>
<p>Jeff from WI on November 6, 2009 at 5:05 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Do you know how to find housing for pimps and prostitutes?<br />
I think there&#8217;s big grant $$ available for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogsoldier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2918892</link>
		<dc:creator>dogsoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2918892</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The Bush recession is over. The Obama recovery has begin.

    Bleeds Blue on October 29, 2009 at 9:32 AM &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Saw this on another thread and almost laughed my ass out of my chair.

Bythe way the actual unemployment number is now at 17.5%, if we can believe ANYTHING out of the bozo regime.

Go to www.bls.gov and search for U-6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Bush recession is over. The Obama recovery has begin.</p>
<p>    Bleeds Blue on October 29, 2009 at 9:32 AM </p></blockquote>
<p>Saw this on another thread and almost laughed my ass out of my chair.</p>
<p>Bythe way the actual unemployment number is now at 17.5%, if we can believe ANYTHING out of the bozo regime.</p>
<p>Go to <a href="http://www.bls.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.bls.gov</a> and search for U-6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mojave Mark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2918872</link>
		<dc:creator>Mojave Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2918872</guid>
		<description>That chart is obviously racist. All of us at HA should lobby for statistical justice.

Statistical justice &lt;strong&gt;NOW&lt;/strong&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That chart is obviously racist. All of us at HA should lobby for statistical justice.</p>
<p>Statistical justice <strong>NOW</strong>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metric</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2918741</link>
		<dc:creator>metric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2918741</guid>
		<description>Obviously the chart is racially biased...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously the chart is racially biased&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angryed</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2918720</link>
		<dc:creator>angryed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2918720</guid>
		<description>Socialism didn&#039;t work in the 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s anywhere in the world.

Why would anyone think it would work in the 00s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Socialism didn&#8217;t work in the 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s anywhere in the world.</p>
<p>Why would anyone think it would work in the 00s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr.blacksheep</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2918686</link>
		<dc:creator>mr.blacksheep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2918686</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;ernesto on November 6, 2009 at 5:52 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think you&#039;re over-simplifying it quite a lot.  Businesses aren&#039;t computers that simply crunch numbers; they are run by people, and those people do not have confidence in our economy.  That lack of confidence, in my opinion, is being caused by an erratic and leftward-lurching government.  Every piece of legislation so far introduced in this legislative year is harmful to the economy and hostile to business.  That fact, &lt;strong&gt;in conjunction&lt;/strong&gt; with the startling &lt;em&gt;rate of increase&lt;/em&gt; of the deficit and debt, the unprecedented increase in the money supply, and the apparent unwillingness of the government to take serious corrective steps (preferring instead to blame the previous administration and continue blundering on), points to further economic and fiscal trouble ahead.  Remember, the coming devaluation of the currency is going to spike up interest rates, which is going to play havoc with investment valuations (if you are not familiar with the Capital Asset Pricing Model, you should become so).

You mention consumer spending.  A rational consumer isn&#039;t going to go on a spending binge when the very real possibility of being laid off looms on the horizon.  Those who aren&#039;t laid off are going to face the double whammy of big tax hits and high inflation (and its consequent bracket creep).

In any event, as has been repeatedly proven in failed economic &quot;stimulus&quot; after failed economic &quot;stimulus&quot;, wealth creation isn&#039;t based on spending, it is based on &lt;em&gt;value creation&lt;/em&gt; (ie. production and investment).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>ernesto on November 6, 2009 at 5:52 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I think you&#8217;re over-simplifying it quite a lot.  Businesses aren&#8217;t computers that simply crunch numbers; they are run by people, and those people do not have confidence in our economy.  That lack of confidence, in my opinion, is being caused by an erratic and leftward-lurching government.  Every piece of legislation so far introduced in this legislative year is harmful to the economy and hostile to business.  That fact, <strong>in conjunction</strong> with the startling <em>rate of increase</em> of the deficit and debt, the unprecedented increase in the money supply, and the apparent unwillingness of the government to take serious corrective steps (preferring instead to blame the previous administration and continue blundering on), points to further economic and fiscal trouble ahead.  Remember, the coming devaluation of the currency is going to spike up interest rates, which is going to play havoc with investment valuations (if you are not familiar with the Capital Asset Pricing Model, you should become so).</p>
<p>You mention consumer spending.  A rational consumer isn&#8217;t going to go on a spending binge when the very real possibility of being laid off looms on the horizon.  Those who aren&#8217;t laid off are going to face the double whammy of big tax hits and high inflation (and its consequent bracket creep).</p>
<p>In any event, as has been repeatedly proven in failed economic &#8220;stimulus&#8221; after failed economic &#8220;stimulus&#8221;, wealth creation isn&#8217;t based on spending, it is based on <em>value creation</em> (ie. production and investment).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davod</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2918683</link>
		<dc:creator>davod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2918683</guid>
		<description>Thw Republicans should be attacking the Dems for holding back stimulus money so they can use it for the 2010 elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thw Republicans should be attacking the Dems for holding back stimulus money so they can use it for the 2010 elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HondaV65</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2918574</link>
		<dc:creator>HondaV65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2918574</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We can argue at the margins over whether it coulda been less here or more there (and lets not forget the stimulus was 1/2 TAX CUTS), but I find it hard to believe that the unemployment rate is a direct result of failed Obama policy.

ernesto on November 6, 2009 at 4:42 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s a result of Obama fascism.  When the Capitalists suddenly realize that all the rules have changed - and that they now have a hostile government that will not allow them to take profits - then you get what we have now.

You&#039;ll get even worse once the Capitalists realize that Capitalism is dead.

We&#039;re in a fascist economy now - the Capitalists realize that they are now allowed to make only the profit that the Democratic party believes they should make - and not a penny more.  The Executives on Wall Street are demonized by this White House and their pay has been limited.  Bond holders of auto-companies were demonized by this White House - and their money was basically confiscated and given to the Labor Unions.  All across America - small businesses are bracing for new tax hikes.  All across America - the rich people who produce the jobs for the rest of us are bracing for new tax hikes.  Power companies are standing by for punitive cap and tax penalties.

It&#039;s fascism ... It&#039;s OBAMA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We can argue at the margins over whether it coulda been less here or more there (and lets not forget the stimulus was 1/2 TAX CUTS), but I find it hard to believe that the unemployment rate is a direct result of failed Obama policy.</p>
<p>ernesto on November 6, 2009 at 4:42 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s a result of Obama fascism.  When the Capitalists suddenly realize that all the rules have changed &#8211; and that they now have a hostile government that will not allow them to take profits &#8211; then you get what we have now.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll get even worse once the Capitalists realize that Capitalism is dead.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re in a fascist economy now &#8211; the Capitalists realize that they are now allowed to make only the profit that the Democratic party believes they should make &#8211; and not a penny more.  The Executives on Wall Street are demonized by this White House and their pay has been limited.  Bond holders of auto-companies were demonized by this White House &#8211; and their money was basically confiscated and given to the Labor Unions.  All across America &#8211; small businesses are bracing for new tax hikes.  All across America &#8211; the rich people who produce the jobs for the rest of us are bracing for new tax hikes.  Power companies are standing by for punitive cap and tax penalties.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s fascism &#8230; It&#8217;s OBAMA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hog Wild</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2918570</link>
		<dc:creator>Hog Wild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2918570</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m having trouble...

Is that the unemployment graph or NASA&#039;s next launch tragjectory?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having trouble&#8230;</p>
<p>Is that the unemployment graph or NASA&#8217;s next launch tragjectory?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brat4life</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/06/graph-of-the-day/comment-page-2/#comment-2918565</link>
		<dc:creator>Brat4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71673#comment-2918565</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s like a house of cards they are building higher while pulling out the cards on the bottom one day it&#039;s going to fall. The mess we are in sucks. Last year all we heard was Bush was spending too much money. Now we have the donkey&#039;s in charge spending even more. No one can predict what&#039;s going to happen because we&#039;ve never been in this perdicament before. 

What&#039;s going to happen come next year when the government is going to be short on the taxes they are going to unexpectedly going to be short on. Are they going to pull a CA and take 10% more out of our paychecks. Scary times we are in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s like a house of cards they are building higher while pulling out the cards on the bottom one day it&#8217;s going to fall. The mess we are in sucks. Last year all we heard was Bush was spending too much money. Now we have the donkey&#8217;s in charge spending even more. No one can predict what&#8217;s going to happen because we&#8217;ve never been in this perdicament before. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s going to happen come next year when the government is going to be short on the taxes they are going to unexpectedly going to be short on. Are they going to pull a CA and take 10% more out of our paychecks. Scary times we are in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
