<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WaPo: Elections not a referendum on Obama, but &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 09:42:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AH_C</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2907944</link>
		<dc:creator>AH_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2907944</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Not true.

Pappy Bush got thrown out after 1 term because the objective media refused to report that the economic recovery had actually started in March of 1991, or 18 months before the election. Had they reported that, Clinton would never have been able to win on “it’s the economy, stupid”.

The NY Times finally got around to admitting that the recovery in fact did begin in March of 1991. Took them until December of 1999 to do so, however.

Del Dolemonte on November 4, 2009 at 12:38 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I dunno about that having much effect.  Yes, they allowed Slick to make it about the economy, but plenty didn&#039;t buy it to make the difference.  Plenty of conservatives and/or Reagan Democrats either sat on their hands or went for Perot out of disgust for Pappy Voodoo-economics.  If Bush was even marginally conservative from the heart, he could have won his 2nd term.  That&#039;s where the delta lies, methinks, in betraying the conservative base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Not true.</p>
<p>Pappy Bush got thrown out after 1 term because the objective media refused to report that the economic recovery had actually started in March of 1991, or 18 months before the election. Had they reported that, Clinton would never have been able to win on “it’s the economy, stupid”.</p>
<p>The NY Times finally got around to admitting that the recovery in fact did begin in March of 1991. Took them until December of 1999 to do so, however.</p>
<p>Del Dolemonte on November 4, 2009 at 12:38 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I dunno about that having much effect.  Yes, they allowed Slick to make it about the economy, but plenty didn&#8217;t buy it to make the difference.  Plenty of conservatives and/or Reagan Democrats either sat on their hands or went for Perot out of disgust for Pappy Voodoo-economics.  If Bush was even marginally conservative from the heart, he could have won his 2nd term.  That&#8217;s where the delta lies, methinks, in betraying the conservative base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yoda</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905823</link>
		<dc:creator>yoda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905823</guid>
		<description>The President&#039;s bed must be pretty crowded with all of the newspapers and MSM under the covers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The President&#8217;s bed must be pretty crowded with all of the newspapers and MSM under the covers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; 2009 election post-mortem</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905778</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; 2009 election post-mortem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905778</guid>
		<description>[...] Ed Morrissey nicely addresses the Democratic talking point this was “anti-incumbent” fervor, by pointing out that such disproportionately hurts the majority party, i.e., Democrats. I would add that the new Democrat talking points about how predictable the GOP wins in Virginia and New Jersey were ought to put the rest the old Democrat instant talking points that the 2008 elections marked a political realignment likely to last 40 years. Instead, the results looked like 1993, where a GOP blowout in Virginia and a win in NJ were part of the prelude to a GOP tsunami in 1994. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ed Morrissey nicely addresses the Democratic talking point this was “anti-incumbent” fervor, by pointing out that such disproportionately hurts the majority party, i.e., Democrats. I would add that the new Democrat talking points about how predictable the GOP wins in Virginia and New Jersey were ought to put the rest the old Democrat instant talking points that the 2008 elections marked a political realignment likely to last 40 years. Instead, the results looked like 1993, where a GOP blowout in Virginia and a win in NJ were part of the prelude to a GOP tsunami in 1994. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Queen0fCups</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905753</link>
		<dc:creator>Queen0fCups</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905753</guid>
		<description>Oh, well, that&#039;s because O is not a Dem, but a socialist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, well, that&#8217;s because O is not a Dem, but a socialist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 18-1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905616</link>
		<dc:creator>18-1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905616</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I really think your comment there was truly offensive. If you lean liberal, don’t they espouse tolerance? Seems so many are lacking in that.

capejasmine on November 4, 2009 at 12:40 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Liberal tolerance is kind of like the urban legends about people putting razor blades in candy - every year you hear about it, but no one seems to have ever actually encountered it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I really think your comment there was truly offensive. If you lean liberal, don’t they espouse tolerance? Seems so many are lacking in that.</p>
<p>capejasmine on November 4, 2009 at 12:40 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Liberal tolerance is kind of like the urban legends about people putting razor blades in candy &#8211; every year you hear about it, but no one seems to have ever actually encountered it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 18-1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905610</link>
		<dc:creator>18-1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905610</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Gibbs chalked the losses up to “anti-incumbent” fervor, and most of the media failed to remember that Democrats are the incumbent power, as Jonah Goldberg reminds them at The Corner:&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, in 2008 the Obamedia repeatedly insinuated that the Republicans still controlled congress and fooled enough people to give the Democrats total control of the body - so you can&#039;t fault them from reusing the same arguments.

BTW, with all the media naval gazing we see on a regular basis, it is interesting they could care less about such a fundamental mistake they induced in the electorate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Gibbs chalked the losses up to “anti-incumbent” fervor, and most of the media failed to remember that Democrats are the incumbent power, as Jonah Goldberg reminds them at The Corner:</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, in 2008 the Obamedia repeatedly insinuated that the Republicans still controlled congress and fooled enough people to give the Democrats total control of the body &#8211; so you can&#8217;t fault them from reusing the same arguments.</p>
<p>BTW, with all the media naval gazing we see on a regular basis, it is interesting they could care less about such a fundamental mistake they induced in the electorate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capejasmine</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905602</link>
		<dc:creator>capejasmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905602</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You want to take the country back…but you want to give it to a fat person? What if he eats it?

Proud Rino on November 4, 2009 at 12:17 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m going to add a bit to Martin Luther King. Dont&#039; judge a man by the color of his skin, or his physical appearance...judge him by his character.

I really think your comment there was truly offensive. If you lean liberal, don&#039;t they espouse tolerance? Seems so many are lacking in that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You want to take the country back…but you want to give it to a fat person? What if he eats it?</p>
<p>Proud Rino on November 4, 2009 at 12:17 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m going to add a bit to Martin Luther King. Dont&#8217; judge a man by the color of his skin, or his physical appearance&#8230;judge him by his character.</p>
<p>I really think your comment there was truly offensive. If you lean liberal, don&#8217;t they espouse tolerance? Seems so many are lacking in that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Del Dolemonte</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905596</link>
		<dc:creator>Del Dolemonte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905596</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You’ve got to be extraordinarily bad, plus go up against an extremely effective opponent, to get thrown out after 1 term. 

ernesto on November 4, 2009 at 11:29 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not true.

Pappy Bush got thrown out after 1 term because the objective media refused to report that the economic recovery had actually started in March of 1991, or 18 months before the election. Had they reported that, Clinton would never have been able to win on &quot;it&#039;s the economy, stupid&quot;.

The NY Times finally got around to admitting that the recovery in fact did begin in March of 1991. Took them until December of 1999 to do so, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You’ve got to be extraordinarily bad, plus go up against an extremely effective opponent, to get thrown out after 1 term. </p>
<p>ernesto on November 4, 2009 at 11:29 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Not true.</p>
<p>Pappy Bush got thrown out after 1 term because the objective media refused to report that the economic recovery had actually started in March of 1991, or 18 months before the election. Had they reported that, Clinton would never have been able to win on &#8220;it&#8217;s the economy, stupid&#8221;.</p>
<p>The NY Times finally got around to admitting that the recovery in fact did begin in March of 1991. Took them until December of 1999 to do so, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweet_Thang</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905593</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweet_Thang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905593</guid>
		<description>Like the Carpenters once sang:

&lt;strong&gt;&quot;We&#039;ve only just begun...&lt;/strong&gt;

[to drain the swamp]&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the Carpenters once sang:</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;We&#8217;ve only just begun&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[to drain the swamp]&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dthorny</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905590</link>
		<dc:creator>dthorny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905590</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I am so glad this jerk and his outsized ego are gone. Both of his campaigns set new lows for lies, distortions, and personal attacks. People I know in New Jersey were thoroughly disgusted. The only people who voted for him were knee-jerk Democrats and unionists.

rockmom on November 4, 2009 at 12:14 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

 File this away for reuse in November 2012!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I am so glad this jerk and his outsized ego are gone. Both of his campaigns set new lows for lies, distortions, and personal attacks. People I know in New Jersey were thoroughly disgusted. The only people who voted for him were knee-jerk Democrats and unionists.</p>
<p>rockmom on November 4, 2009 at 12:14 PM</p></blockquote>
<p> File this away for reuse in November 2012!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Conservative</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905582</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905582</guid>
		<description>Last February, neither party had a clue that the people were about to revolt. Now, 9 months later the revolt has led to a liberal GOP candidate being forced out of the race and a conservative, unheard of until a month or two ago to garner 45% of the vote. It has led to two Republican governors-elect — one in the bluest of the blue states. It ain’t over folks. Keep up the pressure!
&lt;a href=&quot;http://bachmann.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=152545&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;For those in VA, MD, DC, join Michele Bachmann tomorrow on the capitol steps at noon.&lt;/a&gt;
For those of us in the heartland, 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://teapartyexpress.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;find the tea party express gathering near you.&lt;/a&gt;

Christian Conservative on November 4, 2009 at 12:30 PM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last February, neither party had a clue that the people were about to revolt. Now, 9 months later the revolt has led to a liberal GOP candidate being forced out of the race and a conservative, unheard of until a month or two ago to garner 45% of the vote. It has led to two Republican governors-elect — one in the bluest of the blue states. It ain’t over folks. Keep up the pressure!<br />
<a href="http://bachmann.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=152545" rel="nofollow">For those in VA, MD, DC, join Michele Bachmann tomorrow on the capitol steps at noon.</a><br />
For those of us in the heartland,<br />
<a href="http://teapartyexpress.org" rel="nofollow">find the tea party express gathering near you.</a></p>
<p>Christian Conservative on November 4, 2009 at 12:30 PM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dthorny</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905577</link>
		<dc:creator>dthorny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905577</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;NY-23 shows that all this early voting crap and filling out absentee ballots before Election Day should not be done. How many loyal Republicans who wanted a Republican to win ended up screwed by Scozzy’s antics?

Speedwagon82 on November 4, 2009 at 12:27 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

 Sadly, enough for Hoffman to lose by 2,500 votes due to the Scuzzy-navel mishap. 

 The moral: Conservatives WON EVERYTHING last night, including Hoffman, if you combined those votes miscast for Scuzzy-navel.


2010 will be a resurgance for conservatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>NY-23 shows that all this early voting crap and filling out absentee ballots before Election Day should not be done. How many loyal Republicans who wanted a Republican to win ended up screwed by Scozzy’s antics?</p>
<p>Speedwagon82 on November 4, 2009 at 12:27 PM</p></blockquote>
<p> Sadly, enough for Hoffman to lose by 2,500 votes due to the Scuzzy-navel mishap. </p>
<p> The moral: Conservatives WON EVERYTHING last night, including Hoffman, if you combined those votes miscast for Scuzzy-navel.</p>
<p>2010 will be a resurgance for conservatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweet_Thang</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905571</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweet_Thang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905571</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;those of us who wish to take back our country from the communist/socialists.

Sweet_Thang on November 4, 2009 at 12:15 PM 
&lt;strong&gt;You want to take the country back…but you want to give it to a fat person? What if he eats it?&lt;/strong&gt;

Proud Rino on November 4, 2009 at 12:17 PM&lt;blockquote&gt;
That&#039;s a huge swing and a miss on your part, proud wino! Where do I mention we want to &quot;..give [our country] to a fat person&quot;?

&lt;strong&gt;Although I would endorse giving ANY fat person the entire 2,000 page Nazi Pelosi $1.2 trillion health scare bill to eat, use as an a$$wipe, whatever. &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>those of us who wish to take back our country from the communist/socialists.</p>
<p>Sweet_Thang on November 4, 2009 at 12:15 PM<br />
<strong>You want to take the country back…but you want to give it to a fat person? What if he eats it?</strong></p>
<p>Proud Rino on November 4, 2009 at 12:17 PM<br />
<blockquote>
That&#8217;s a huge swing and a miss on your part, proud wino! Where do I mention we want to &#8220;..give [our country] to a fat person&#8221;?</p>
<p><strong>Although I would endorse giving ANY fat person the entire 2,000 page Nazi Pelosi $1.2 trillion health scare bill to eat, use as an a$$wipe, whatever. </strong></p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capejasmine</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905565</link>
		<dc:creator>capejasmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905565</guid>
		<description>The media as a whole, just doesn&#039;t get it. Pandering to one side, as opposed to reporting fairly, and without bias, has hurt them more than anything with readers, and viewers. Just report, and keep your opinions to yourself. You may find your way back to credibility at some point....but I doubt it. I personally think...it&#039;s to late!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The media as a whole, just doesn&#8217;t get it. Pandering to one side, as opposed to reporting fairly, and without bias, has hurt them more than anything with readers, and viewers. Just report, and keep your opinions to yourself. You may find your way back to credibility at some point&#8230;.but I doubt it. I personally think&#8230;it&#8217;s to late!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dthorny</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905551</link>
		<dc:creator>dthorny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905551</guid>
		<description>The republic spoke and said &quot;words, not Deeds&quot; in Virginia.

 
&lt;blockquote&gt;those of us who wish to take back our country from the communist/socialists.

Sweet_Thang on November 4, 2009 at 12:15 PM 
You want to take the country back…but you want to give it to a fat person? What if he eats it?

Proud Rino on November 4, 2009 at 12:17 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

 No worries, liberal rino, Obama will regulate EVERYTHING 
  YOU CAN EAT OR DRINK, HE KNOWS EVERYTHING.

 Better than a clown like Corzine attempting to BUY THE 
  VICTORY with 120 million and loses!!!.

 It can&#039;t taste as bad as the crap Obama has been spewing.

 These governor losses are bitter pills for Obama to 
  swallow.

 Wow, fat jokes? You have a career as a writer for 
  Letterman. Remember. keep it simple, you sure have that 
  down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The republic spoke and said &#8220;words, not Deeds&#8221; in Virginia.</p>
<blockquote><p>those of us who wish to take back our country from the communist/socialists.</p>
<p>Sweet_Thang on November 4, 2009 at 12:15 PM<br />
You want to take the country back…but you want to give it to a fat person? What if he eats it?</p>
<p>Proud Rino on November 4, 2009 at 12:17 PM</p></blockquote>
<p> No worries, liberal rino, Obama will regulate EVERYTHING<br />
  YOU CAN EAT OR DRINK, HE KNOWS EVERYTHING.</p>
<p> Better than a clown like Corzine attempting to BUY THE<br />
  VICTORY with 120 million and loses!!!.</p>
<p> It can&#8217;t taste as bad as the crap Obama has been spewing.</p>
<p> These governor losses are bitter pills for Obama to<br />
  swallow.</p>
<p> Wow, fat jokes? You have a career as a writer for<br />
  Letterman. Remember. keep it simple, you sure have that<br />
  down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speedwagon82</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905547</link>
		<dc:creator>Speedwagon82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905547</guid>
		<description>NY-23 shows that all this early voting crap and filling out absentee ballots before Election Day should not be done. How many loyal Republicans who wanted a Republican to win ended up screwed by Scozzy&#039;s antics?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NY-23 shows that all this early voting crap and filling out absentee ballots before Election Day should not be done. How many loyal Republicans who wanted a Republican to win ended up screwed by Scozzy&#8217;s antics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweet_Thang</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905537</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweet_Thang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905537</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Gibbs chalked the losses up to “anti-incumbent” fervor, and most of the media failed to remember that Democrats are the incumbent power, as Jonah Goldberg reminds them at The Corner:
There were no incumbents running in Virginia. Governors can only serve one term here. So how can McDonnell’s win be due to “anti-incumbent” fervor?

Gabe on November 4, 2009 at 11:53 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I wholeheartedly agree with Gibbs&#039; &quot;anti-incumbent fervor&quot; analysis, but he left out one minor detail:

&lt;strong&gt;The real target of this anti-incumbent fervor is the incumbent currently occupying the White House, Chairman MaoBarry. &lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Gibbs chalked the losses up to “anti-incumbent” fervor, and most of the media failed to remember that Democrats are the incumbent power, as Jonah Goldberg reminds them at The Corner:<br />
There were no incumbents running in Virginia. Governors can only serve one term here. So how can McDonnell’s win be due to “anti-incumbent” fervor?</p>
<p>Gabe on November 4, 2009 at 11:53 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I wholeheartedly agree with Gibbs&#8217; &#8220;anti-incumbent fervor&#8221; analysis, but he left out one minor detail:</p>
<p><strong>The real target of this anti-incumbent fervor is the incumbent currently occupying the White House, Chairman MaoBarry. </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ted c</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905535</link>
		<dc:creator>ted c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905535</guid>
		<description>Obama: coming up zeroes once again....

0 for 2 on gubernatorial elections....

0 for healthcare

0 for cap and trade

0 for gitmo...

yep, all 0, all day, all night, in stere0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama: coming up zeroes once again&#8230;.</p>
<p>0 for 2 on gubernatorial elections&#8230;.</p>
<p>0 for healthcare</p>
<p>0 for cap and trade</p>
<p>0 for gitmo&#8230;</p>
<p>yep, all 0, all day, all night, in stere0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red State State of Mind</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905529</link>
		<dc:creator>Red State State of Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905529</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The Post really sold itself out for Deeds ............. they’re not the only media outlet that needs Remedial Objectivity on their curriculum.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(Media) Whores of a Feather Flock Together....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Post really sold itself out for Deeds &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. they’re not the only media outlet that needs Remedial Objectivity on their curriculum.</p></blockquote>
<p>(Media) Whores of a Feather Flock Together&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profitsbeard</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905515</link>
		<dc:creator>profitsbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905515</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Obama- the lead lifejacket!&lt;/strong&gt;

Men overboard!

&lt;em&gt;Corzine astern, Deeds abaft!&lt;/em&gt;

Full speed ahead!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Obama- the lead lifejacket!</strong></p>
<p>Men overboard!</p>
<p><em>Corzine astern, Deeds abaft!</em></p>
<p>Full speed ahead!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Proud Rino</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905503</link>
		<dc:creator>Proud Rino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905503</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;those of us who wish to take back our country from the communist/socialists.

Sweet_Thang on November 4, 2009 at 12:15 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You want to take the country back...but you want to give it to a fat person?  &lt;em&gt;What if he eats it?&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>those of us who wish to take back our country from the communist/socialists.</p>
<p>Sweet_Thang on November 4, 2009 at 12:15 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>You want to take the country back&#8230;but you want to give it to a fat person?  <em>What if he eats it?</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gator Country</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905502</link>
		<dc:creator>Gator Country</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905502</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Corzine is such a tool. He runs vicious, nasty, personal campaigns with his personal fortunes, breaks his promises and then, when it’s all over, he’s Mr. Manners. What good is grace when you only show it after the race?

Proud Rino on November 4, 2009 at 12:04 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Political cover.  All the nastiness and the personal attacks on Christie during the campaign can and will now be flushed down the memory hole, while the state and national Dems huddle with their media partners to hash out plans to utterly destroy Christie and his term in office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Corzine is such a tool. He runs vicious, nasty, personal campaigns with his personal fortunes, breaks his promises and then, when it’s all over, he’s Mr. Manners. What good is grace when you only show it after the race?</p>
<p>Proud Rino on November 4, 2009 at 12:04 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Political cover.  All the nastiness and the personal attacks on Christie during the campaign can and will now be flushed down the memory hole, while the state and national Dems huddle with their media partners to hash out plans to utterly destroy Christie and his term in office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wyznowski</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905493</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyznowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905493</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the marginalized GOP that was destroyed in the last election and is in total disarray from their extremist/terrorist radical conservative base won a couple elections...big deal. That doesn&#039;t mean anything. Teabagging doesn&#039;t win elections. The real people still love, worship, and revere Obama.  Nothing to see here, move along... /s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the marginalized GOP that was destroyed in the last election and is in total disarray from their extremist/terrorist radical conservative base won a couple elections&#8230;big deal. That doesn&#8217;t mean anything. Teabagging doesn&#8217;t win elections. The real people still love, worship, and revere Obama.  Nothing to see here, move along&#8230; /s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweet_Thang</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905494</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweet_Thang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905494</guid>
		<description>Yesterday&#039;s election results in Virginia and New Jersey are absolutely exhilarating for those of us who wish to take back our country from the communist/socialists.

&lt;strong&gt;Wouldn&#039;t it be cool, in the face of -0-&#039;s ambitions for enslaving us with socialized medicine, to launch an ambitious campaign to privatize Social Security and Medicare?&lt;/strong&gt;

Let&#039;s turn back the dangerously rising tide of gubmint hackdom, or maybe it&#039;s &lt;strong&gt;hackdumb&lt;/strong&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday&#8217;s election results in Virginia and New Jersey are absolutely exhilarating for those of us who wish to take back our country from the communist/socialists.</p>
<p><strong>Wouldn&#8217;t it be cool, in the face of -0-&#8217;s ambitions for enslaving us with socialized medicine, to launch an ambitious campaign to privatize Social Security and Medicare?</strong></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s turn back the dangerously rising tide of gubmint hackdom, or maybe it&#8217;s <strong>hackdumb</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thevastlane</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/04/wapo-elections-not-a-referendum-on-obama-but/comment-page-2/#comment-2905490</link>
		<dc:creator>thevastlane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=71334#comment-2905490</guid>
		<description>rockmom on November 4, 2009 at 11:54 AM

I agree that social issues need to be put on the back burner.  But I will not vote for anyone who will back partial birth abortion or use taxpayer money for abortions (which I realize already occurs with Planned &lt;strike&gt;Parenthood&lt;/strike&gt; Abortionsinthehood).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rockmom on November 4, 2009 at 11:54 AM</p>
<p>I agree that social issues need to be put on the back burner.  But I will not vote for anyone who will back partial birth abortion or use taxpayer money for abortions (which I realize already occurs with Planned <strike>Parenthood</strike> Abortionsinthehood).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
