Maricopa County going after bloggers?
posted at 3:30 pm on October 28, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Or so it seems. This actually raises some interesting questions about free speech, conflict of interest, and bureaucratic overreach, in a county where the sheriff usually gets all of the national attention. The Maricopa County (AZ) Manager sent a letter to its Public Information Officer demanding to know whether he had communicated with the blog Sonoran Alliance, which publishes mainly anonymous posts with detailed inside information on government actions and policy. The demand extended beyond Michael Scerbo’s official actions to any contact he made on his own personal time, as the letter indicates (via Instapundit):
Even with all of the court rulings in 2009, you are a lawyer representing Maricopa County. This letter is sent to you by your client requesting information from you. …
As part of Maricopa County’s continued effort to receive conflict free legal advice we request that each of you personally answer the following questions, in writing, within five days of the date of this letter and send your answers to me. The questions must be answered under the Ethical Rules, whether or not a computer, BlackBerry, or other device used was the property of Maricopa County or a personally owned device or machine. A lawyer’s ethical duties do not cease at the office door.
The opening “Even with all the court rulings of 2009,” tends to indicate that Scerbo did not act as a lawyer to the county manager, and that David R. Smith knows he’s reaching with this bullying demand letter. A PIO is usually a public relations position, not an attorney. Even if Scerbo is an attorney, the advice he gives the county would not be legal advice but political and public-relations advice. There would be no expectation of attorney-client privilege in that relationship, and therefore the entire justification of the letter seems very suspect.
Even if he did act as an attorney in his official duties, does Smith have the right to demand that Scerbo disclose all of his “associations” as a condition of employment? If I hired a lawyer and then demanded to see the hard drives of his home computer, I suspect that I would get laughed out of the office and find myself looking for new representation. Furthermore, while leaks are usually illegal and almost always unethical (as there are other ways to address problems within channels), this is not a question of private transactions between a lawyer and his client. The leaks would involve actions by public officials, who should have no expectations of privacy — and who, in fact, should be held to the highest degree of transparency. The fact that Smith send these letters strongly suggests that he is less interested in accountability than in silencing dissent, hardly a healthy trait.
The Sonoran Alliance is not standing by silently, either:
Over time, several of our bloggers have reported on the machinations of County Government but these have been reported elsewhere or are in the public domain. Our posts are also considered editorial pieces which I would remind Manager Smith that he is the manager of the 5th largest county in the country which is not without disagreements and controversy.
The other point I would make, and I hope the County Manager reads this, is that I have never, do not and never will reveal the identities of those who write for Sonoran Alliance. Over the years, we have had almost two dozen contributors to this blog and I am not about to expose any of them over some county public relations problem. Similarly, I also want to be clear that Sonoran Alliance does not reveal any relationships it has with local, county, state or federal governmental entities.
I recognize that this latest battle is between the County Manager and the County Attorney. I have NOT been approached by anyone from the County Manager’s Office regarding this inquisition and I would warn the County Manager that he may be treading dangerously close to chilling someone’s First Amendment rights.
The county manager is certainly dangerously close to making an ass of himself.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Would be the first time someone in such a position did that. Just look at Obama vs Fox.
GarandFan on October 28, 2009 at 3:38 PM
From county managers to Presidents……any pol is easily capable of making as ass of themselves. It’s almost a prerequisite.
JoeinTX on October 28, 2009 at 3:39 PM
OH I would love to see updates of this in the future!
upinak on October 28, 2009 at 3:39 PM
From the letter, one of the sites that are suspect is Intellectual Conservative Arizona, seems peculiar to me.
fourdeucer on October 28, 2009 at 3:42 PM
There’s that word again…
Seven Percent Solution on October 28, 2009 at 3:42 PM
What you do in your own time is none of the client’s business. Back when I was practicing law, my main area of practice was criminal law. In the summers one of my favourite pastimes was playing third base for a ball team made up of both defence counsel and Crown Attorneys (prosecutors). That was no conflict…it was my time to do with as I saw fit.
The recipients of the threat ought to tell Maricopa County they can either pay them for 24/7/365 or “get stuffed”.
Blaise on October 28, 2009 at 3:45 PM
Many years ago, I worked for a municipality as Director of Purchasing. As such, millions of dollars passed through my hands annually. An older gentleman, (who I met through professional organizations) once counseled me when I posed a question regarding conduct that I considered on the borderline (no pun intended) of ethical conduct. His advice was simple, “Whatever you say or do, just ask yourself how it would look on the front page of tomorrow mornings newspaper.”
That ship may have already sailed.
oldleprechaun on October 28, 2009 at 3:48 PM
I haven’t seen anything on Sheriff Joe lately. What is his status?
Mangy Scot on October 28, 2009 at 3:49 PM
The Intellectual Conservative Arizona site is part of the Arizona Right to Life Organization.
fourdeucer on October 28, 2009 at 3:49 PM
Terminal cluelessness seems to be a habit in some areas of Maricopa County.
The person who runs the Bad Phoenix Cops blog has been subjected to a lot of abuse by the Phoenix city PD over the past year or so due to their targeting of a number of the PD’s executives and officers for reasons such as gross malfeasance and incompetence.
One specific target is a detective referred to as “Mr. Potato Head”, who kept evidence from a high-profile serial killer case, the Baseline Murders, in his garage and didn’t get it tested for DNA in the nine months between taking it into custody and the eventual arrest of the murderer.
teke184 on October 28, 2009 at 3:51 PM
Well it’s a good thing I live in Pinal County Arizona and not Maricopa County, that and I’m just a blog-groupie/commentor.
I was worried when I moved to AZ in 1993 that the scourge of liberal victimhood/mentality/ideology would creep its way into the state and AZ would eventually become California East!
Time to move again!
Liberty or Death on October 28, 2009 at 3:53 PM
Still awesome. :)
jennifernaz on October 28, 2009 at 3:53 PM
I don’t know about the victimhood/mentatlity/ideology, but I believe Colorado is the official California East now.
MobileVideoEngineer on October 28, 2009 at 3:57 PM
I completely agree, if they are going to require their employees to act and behave as if they were “on the clock” 24/7/365 then the employees should be paid 24/7/365!
Liberty or Death on October 28, 2009 at 4:04 PM
OT…
Steele on Hannity atm, crawfishin re: NY23.
TXUS on October 28, 2009 at 4:13 PM
After living in AZ for 16 years I can tell you without a doubt a lot of liberals are moving from The People’s Republic of California to AZ and bringing their liberal victimhood mentality/ideology disease with them and just like a disease they are spreading! They consumed and ruined California and now are infecting AZ….like I said, it’s time to move!
Liberty or Death on October 28, 2009 at 4:13 PM
I’m a strong believer in that you don’t use your employer’s equipment or time without the employer’s permission. I’m far from a management toady. I’m just goldbricking coworkers.
However, he’s asking for use of personal equipment to contact this blog, too.
Blake on October 28, 2009 at 4:13 PM
Did Ed say A$$? Huh huh.
nolapol on October 28, 2009 at 4:14 PM
But where do you go? It seems as if it is everywhere.
nolapol on October 28, 2009 at 4:18 PM
It’s so complicated when blogs are involved.
Akzed on October 28, 2009 at 4:46 PM
The liberals in AZ have their panties in such a bunch over Sheriff Joe – THAT is what this is really all about.
I love sending $$$ to Joe’s re-election. I wish he would run for governor. He seems to be the only one serious about illegal immigration law enforcement in the whole country!
Catherine Wilkinson on October 28, 2009 at 4:53 PM
I have to disagree with a portion of the theme of this thread. Not knowing the specifics of this case I will have to tend to side with the county on this. Trying to effect policy you may personally not agree with by leaking information anonymously to public forums is a pretty low gutter move.
I agree with Blaise when he said his ball playing activity was no conflict. It clearly isn’t – UNTIL comments regarding a current case are exchanged with a third party. In his vernacular this whole thing would be like an anonymous post or “news leak” in attempt to poison a jury pool. Just how well would that go over?
The facts currently are too thin to make an informed judgment. If Maricopa County has a hidden agenda or “unstated policy” then yes, they should be held accountable. BUT, so too should the employee if he/she was found to have released information outside his/her purview.
And a final note: The Blogs are not the ones being asked for specifics, the employee is. A thought just occurred to me – what if this was in Ohio and the subject happened to go by “Joe The Plumber”. Wouldn’t you want to know if a government employee gave private information to an outside party? Oh, we’ve covered that one haven’t we?
dkeppner on October 28, 2009 at 4:59 PM
The libtards seems to be trying to sneek into the house through the crawlspace-talk about bulling tactics..sheeesh. buttwipe~
hawkman on October 28, 2009 at 4:59 PM
right here in MC huh?! being unemployed I guess Maricopa COunty will leave me and my little blog alone
ginaswo on October 28, 2009 at 5:05 PM
catherine
a lot of us are asking Joe to run! keep your fingers crossed, we certainly need him!
ginaswo on October 28, 2009 at 5:06 PM
I hear ya, not sure where I’ll go next but wherever I go I will make it my last stand!
Liberty or Death on October 28, 2009 at 5:07 PM
The entire county board are asses. The graft in this county is approaching NOLA and Chicago proportions (Helps that the mayor of Phoenix is a Chicago pol).
Just look at that immoral and corrupt Mary Rose Wilcox and her graft. It’s bad. No only her, but a number of other minority pols get cuts out of the airport’s diversity program.
Tim Burton on October 28, 2009 at 5:36 PM
Yes, and before the libs from east of the Rockies moved in California was an awfully nice place, but no longer.
Blackhawk45 on October 28, 2009 at 5:41 PM
didnt they decertify Sheriff Joe from enforcing immigration laws?
That should tell you all you need to know
Sonosam on October 28, 2009 at 9:13 PM
I disagree with part of Ed’s reasoning.
Correct me if I’m wrong here but attorney-client confidentiality covers any privately communicated information, regardless of whether it is legal or political in nature. An attorney can be disciplined for revealing any client secrets, regardless of their nature.
In this situation however, I seriously doubt if the attorney-client existed between Scerbo and the County.
Captain Kirock on October 28, 2009 at 9:23 PM
I actually AGREE with the letter.
Do not do personal blogging on County (or Company) owned stuff. AND don’t do it on County (or Company) time.
You have a indisputable right to speak (and type) your opinion, but I don’t have to pay for it.
As far as the Attorney-Client, if an Attorney takes a job as a Domino’s Pizza driver, he is not acting as an Attorney and not covered by special privlege.
barnone on October 29, 2009 at 8:53 AM