<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN poll: 71% say Palin&#8217;s unqualified to be president</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 07:23:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fitzsweetpea</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-9/#comment-3024420</link>
		<dc:creator>fitzsweetpea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 01:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-3024420</guid>
		<description>I love you, Allahpundit, you magnificent, deeply tiresome bastard...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love you, Allahpundit, you magnificent, deeply tiresome bastard&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Politics Daily: How Palin could win the 2012 nomination</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-9/#comment-2955543</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Politics Daily: How Palin could win the 2012 nomination</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2955543</guid>
		<description>[...] on qualifications, it too is an improvement (a double-digit improvement, in fact) over CNN&#8217;s notoriously gruesome poll result from last month. The bad news? CNN re-polled the question to coincide with her book [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on qualifications, it too is an improvement (a double-digit improvement, in fact) over CNN&#8217;s notoriously gruesome poll result from last month. The bad news? CNN re-polled the question to coincide with her book [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modern Publicus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-9/#comment-2891008</link>
		<dc:creator>Modern Publicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 01:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2891008</guid>
		<description>Allahpundit:

I do agree with some your assessments, but I am glad you are here with us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allahpundit:</p>
<p>I do agree with some your assessments, but I am glad you are here with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Defense of Sarah Palin&#8217;s Alleged &#8216;Retarded Baby&#8217; Jokes &#171; Daily Dose</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-9/#comment-2890739</link>
		<dc:creator>In Defense of Sarah Palin&#8217;s Alleged &#8216;Retarded Baby&#8217; Jokes &#171; Daily Dose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2890739</guid>
		<description>[...] if you don&#8217;t like Palin, the fact that 71% of Americans don&#8217;t think she&#8217;s qualified to be President even as the other 29% stand ready to make [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if you don&#8217;t like Palin, the fact that 71% of Americans don&#8217;t think she&#8217;s qualified to be President even as the other 29% stand ready to make [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Treacher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-9/#comment-2889930</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Treacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2889930</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Always.

Esthier on October 31, 2009 at 10:21 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Always.</p>
<p>Esthier on October 31, 2009 at 10:21 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Hmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esthier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-9/#comment-2889218</link>
		<dc:creator>Esthier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2889218</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Well, at least you are big enough to admit you are incapable forming an original thought.

Fed45 on October 31, 2009 at 4:38 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, repeating jokes to other people is &lt;em&gt;exactly &lt;/em&gt;proof I can&#039;t come up with an original thought on my own. Cause of course people never quote famous people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Well, at least you are big enough to admit you are incapable forming an original thought.</p>
<p>Fed45 on October 31, 2009 at 4:38 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, repeating jokes to other people is <em>exactly </em>proof I can&#8217;t come up with an original thought on my own. Cause of course people never quote famous people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esthier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-9/#comment-2889204</link>
		<dc:creator>Esthier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2889204</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Relax.

Jim Treacher on October 31, 2009 at 12:11 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Always.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Relax.</p>
<p>Jim Treacher on October 31, 2009 at 12:11 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Always.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fed45</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-9/#comment-2888946</link>
		<dc:creator>Fed45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2888946</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Yes, I’m sure he’d be worried about competition from me on a random blog thread, when everything I’m typing can easily be put into Google for reference.

These aren’t even his obscure jokes, unless you count everything he did as obscure, which is understandable. The man died just when his career could have been taking off.

Esthier on October 30, 2009 at 10:16 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, at least you are big enough to admit you are incapable forming an orgininal thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Yes, I’m sure he’d be worried about competition from me on a random blog thread, when everything I’m typing can easily be put into Google for reference.</p>
<p>These aren’t even his obscure jokes, unless you count everything he did as obscure, which is understandable. The man died just when his career could have been taking off.</p>
<p>Esthier on October 30, 2009 at 10:16 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, at least you are big enough to admit you are incapable forming an orgininal thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William2006</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-9/#comment-2888924</link>
		<dc:creator>William2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2888924</guid>
		<description>Quoting title of this thread: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;CNN poll: 71% say Palin’s unqualified to be president&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

CNN Poll?

Since it is a CNN Poll it is possible that it is a biased poll against Sarah Palin based on the bias of the audience and respondents&#039; sampling.

So, Sarah Palin is &quot;unqualified to be president?&quot;

Not true!

If Barrack Hussein Obama, who barely served as Senator before and during his run for the Presidency, and who was nothing but a leftist, Marxist, Radical Community Organizer who spend much of his formative years in other nations, nations in which Islam was the main influence, something that Obama praised, thus making him not as &quot;American&quot; as a person born and raised here, is qualified to be president of the USA, then certainly Sarah Palin who DID have more executive experience, as PTA activist, Mayor, and Governor, compared to John McCain&#039;s limited experience - Senator, never as an executive, Governor, Mayor, etc., and more proper experience to serve as President of the United States of American than Obama&#039;s, who had a strong lack of experience, is qualified.

Examples:  Obama openly spoke about how he loved the Muslim call to prayer while living in Africa and Asia.  He also gave a speech recently in which he stated that the USA is NOT a Christian Nation, but that the USA is one of the Largest Muslim nations, having among the largest Muslim populations in the world.  

Clearly he was downplaying the Christian influence, history, and cultural mores and values, while building up the Islamic ones.

He also was raised and indoctrinated in Marxism, etc.

Clearly his influences are diametrically opposed to US history, culture, and mores, which carries over into why he is LESS qualified to serve as President of the USA than a person born and raised here with standard, patriotic mores, values, and Love of Country.

Sarah Palin has the upbringing and cultural influence and love of the USA that Obama lacks.  She was not raised on, and indoctrinated into Islam, the call to prayer being the most beautiful sound she&#039;s ever heard, or thinking that the USA is not a &quot;Christian Nation,&quot; but that it is one of the largest Muslim nations, or has among the largest Muslim populations in the world.  Sarah Palin was not indoctrinated into Radical leftist philosophy, politics, etc., or Communism, Fascism, or Socialism as Barrack Obama has been, nor has she been active in them, as Barrack Hussein Obama has been.

That makes Sarah Palin more of a true US citizen with US values, mores, and cultural identity than Obama.
No.

If Obama is &quot;qualified&quot; to be president, then clearly Sarah Palin, who is more qualified than Obama, can serve as president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quoting title of this thread: </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;CNN poll: 71% say Palin’s unqualified to be president&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>CNN Poll?</p>
<p>Since it is a CNN Poll it is possible that it is a biased poll against Sarah Palin based on the bias of the audience and respondents&#8217; sampling.</p>
<p>So, Sarah Palin is &#8220;unqualified to be president?&#8221;</p>
<p>Not true!</p>
<p>If Barrack Hussein Obama, who barely served as Senator before and during his run for the Presidency, and who was nothing but a leftist, Marxist, Radical Community Organizer who spend much of his formative years in other nations, nations in which Islam was the main influence, something that Obama praised, thus making him not as &#8220;American&#8221; as a person born and raised here, is qualified to be president of the USA, then certainly Sarah Palin who DID have more executive experience, as PTA activist, Mayor, and Governor, compared to John McCain&#8217;s limited experience &#8211; Senator, never as an executive, Governor, Mayor, etc., and more proper experience to serve as President of the United States of American than Obama&#8217;s, who had a strong lack of experience, is qualified.</p>
<p>Examples:  Obama openly spoke about how he loved the Muslim call to prayer while living in Africa and Asia.  He also gave a speech recently in which he stated that the USA is NOT a Christian Nation, but that the USA is one of the Largest Muslim nations, having among the largest Muslim populations in the world.  </p>
<p>Clearly he was downplaying the Christian influence, history, and cultural mores and values, while building up the Islamic ones.</p>
<p>He also was raised and indoctrinated in Marxism, etc.</p>
<p>Clearly his influences are diametrically opposed to US history, culture, and mores, which carries over into why he is LESS qualified to serve as President of the USA than a person born and raised here with standard, patriotic mores, values, and Love of Country.</p>
<p>Sarah Palin has the upbringing and cultural influence and love of the USA that Obama lacks.  She was not raised on, and indoctrinated into Islam, the call to prayer being the most beautiful sound she&#8217;s ever heard, or thinking that the USA is not a &#8220;Christian Nation,&#8221; but that it is one of the largest Muslim nations, or has among the largest Muslim populations in the world.  Sarah Palin was not indoctrinated into Radical leftist philosophy, politics, etc., or Communism, Fascism, or Socialism as Barrack Obama has been, nor has she been active in them, as Barrack Hussein Obama has been.</p>
<p>That makes Sarah Palin more of a true US citizen with US values, mores, and cultural identity than Obama.<br />
No.</p>
<p>If Obama is &#8220;qualified&#8221; to be president, then clearly Sarah Palin, who is more qualified than Obama, can serve as president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Treacher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-9/#comment-2888786</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Treacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 04:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2888786</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I never once denied it. I used absurd jokes in response to absurd questions, all from the same comedian, without changing even a word. I know he isn’t a big name exactly, but I assumed someone would recognize at least one of them.

Esthier on October 30, 2009 at 11:02 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Relax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I never once denied it. I used absurd jokes in response to absurd questions, all from the same comedian, without changing even a word. I know he isn’t a big name exactly, but I assumed someone would recognize at least one of them.</p>
<p>Esthier on October 30, 2009 at 11:02 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Relax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MCGIRV</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-9/#comment-2888693</link>
		<dc:creator>MCGIRV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 03:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2888693</guid>
		<description>If Sarah Palin makes a good showing on Oprah the percentages will change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Sarah Palin makes a good showing on Oprah the percentages will change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esthier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-9/#comment-2888675</link>
		<dc:creator>Esthier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 03:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2888675</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So you admit it.

Jim Treacher on October 30, 2009 at 10:30 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I never once denied it. I used absurd jokes in response to absurd questions, all from the same comedian, without changing even a word. I know he isn&#039;t a big name exactly, but I assumed someone would recognize at least one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So you admit it.</p>
<p>Jim Treacher on October 30, 2009 at 10:30 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I never once denied it. I used absurd jokes in response to absurd questions, all from the same comedian, without changing even a word. I know he isn&#8217;t a big name exactly, but I assumed someone would recognize at least one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonosam</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-8/#comment-2888610</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonosam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 02:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2888610</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m betting that if George was still serving his solution might have involved making his taxcuts permanent and probably consider more thus putting the money in the proper hands

you think odumbos solution looks anything like that

you are just trying to diminish what a commie we have in charge supported by a rabid congress

from day one the stimulus ( hah ) was nothing more than stuffing the pockets of the public sector with funds they don&#039;t even know what it will be spent on

consider the attack on the dollar as another raid on peoples wealth and you might realize what shitbags we have running the show

GWB had his weaknesses but in no way does he equate with the current criminals</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m betting that if George was still serving his solution might have involved making his taxcuts permanent and probably consider more thus putting the money in the proper hands</p>
<p>you think odumbos solution looks anything like that</p>
<p>you are just trying to diminish what a commie we have in charge supported by a rabid congress</p>
<p>from day one the stimulus ( hah ) was nothing more than stuffing the pockets of the public sector with funds they don&#8217;t even know what it will be spent on</p>
<p>consider the attack on the dollar as another raid on peoples wealth and you might realize what shitbags we have running the show</p>
<p>GWB had his weaknesses but in no way does he equate with the current criminals</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Treacher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-8/#comment-2888604</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Treacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 02:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2888604</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hedberg, actually.

Esthier on October 30, 2009 at 10:11 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So you admit it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hedberg, actually.</p>
<p>Esthier on October 30, 2009 at 10:11 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>So you admit it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esthier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-8/#comment-2888540</link>
		<dc:creator>Esthier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 02:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2888540</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s unfortunate Mitch Hedberg is no longer alive to accuse you of stealing his jokes without attribution.

Fed45 on October 30, 2009 at 7:45 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, I&#039;m sure he&#039;d be worried about competition from me on a random blog thread, when everything I&#039;m typing can easily be put into Google for reference.

These aren&#039;t even his obscure jokes, unless you count everything he did as obscure, which is understandable. The man died just when his career could have been taking off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It’s unfortunate Mitch Hedberg is no longer alive to accuse you of stealing his jokes without attribution.</p>
<p>Fed45 on October 30, 2009 at 7:45 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;d be worried about competition from me on a random blog thread, when everything I&#8217;m typing can easily be put into Google for reference.</p>
<p>These aren&#8217;t even his obscure jokes, unless you count everything he did as obscure, which is understandable. The man died just when his career could have been taking off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esthier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-8/#comment-2888516</link>
		<dc:creator>Esthier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 02:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2888516</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Dude (or Dudette,whichever it is), between your comments to me and Treacher, you B trippin’.
Word.

Jenfidel on October 30, 2009 at 6:27 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m not sure how to take that from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Dude (or Dudette,whichever it is), between your comments to me and Treacher, you B trippin’.<br />
Word.</p>
<p>Jenfidel on October 30, 2009 at 6:27 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how to take that from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esthier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-8/#comment-2888511</link>
		<dc:creator>Esthier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 02:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2888511</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Which other Mitch Hedburg jokes did you tell?

Jim Treacher on October 30, 2009 at 6:21 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hedberg, actually.

I saw this wino, he was eating grapes. I was like, &quot;Dude, you have to wait.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Which other Mitch Hedburg jokes did you tell?</p>
<p>Jim Treacher on October 30, 2009 at 6:21 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Hedberg, actually.</p>
<p>I saw this wino, he was eating grapes. I was like, &#8220;Dude, you have to wait.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fed45</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-8/#comment-2888078</link>
		<dc:creator>Fed45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2888078</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Rice is great if you’re really hungry and want to eat two thousand of something.

Esthier on October 30, 2009 at 6:13 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s unfortunate Mitch Hedberg is no longer alive to accuse you of stealing his jokes without attribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Rice is great if you’re really hungry and want to eat two thousand of something.</p>
<p>Esthier on October 30, 2009 at 6:13 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s unfortunate Mitch Hedberg is no longer alive to accuse you of stealing his jokes without attribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fed45</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-8/#comment-2888072</link>
		<dc:creator>Fed45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2888072</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m not saying that Bush could have run for president. I was asked why I don’t think Obama’s done much to change the country, and saying he’s doing what I think his predecessor would have done is my way of explaining that. How can you call it “change” if it’s what Bush would have done?

That’s all.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s still a non-starter.  Bush would not have had the opportunity to the things Barry has done.  You might as well say  &quot;Well, Clinton would have done the same thing&quot;. Heck, why not conjecture what GHW Bush or Reagan would have done? It would be more relevant to hypothesize what McCain would have done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’m not saying that Bush could have run for president. I was asked why I don’t think Obama’s done much to change the country, and saying he’s doing what I think his predecessor would have done is my way of explaining that. How can you call it “change” if it’s what Bush would have done?</p>
<p>That’s all.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s still a non-starter.  Bush would not have had the opportunity to the things Barry has done.  You might as well say  &#8220;Well, Clinton would have done the same thing&#8221;. Heck, why not conjecture what GHW Bush or Reagan would have done? It would be more relevant to hypothesize what McCain would have done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenfidel</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-8/#comment-2887860</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenfidel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2887860</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Esthier on October 30, 2009 at 5:52 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Dude (or Dudette,whichever it is), between your comments to me and Treacher, you B trippin&#039;.
Word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Esthier on October 30, 2009 at 5:52 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Dude (or Dudette,whichever it is), between your comments to me and Treacher, you B trippin&#8217;.<br />
Word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Treacher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-8/#comment-2887839</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Treacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2887839</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Sure, I told her:

Rice is great if you’re really hungry and want to eat two thousand of something.

Esthier on October 30, 2009 at 6:13 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Which other Mitch Hedburg jokes did you tell?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Sure, I told her:</p>
<p>Rice is great if you’re really hungry and want to eat two thousand of something.</p>
<p>Esthier on October 30, 2009 at 6:13 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Which other Mitch Hedburg jokes did you tell?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esthier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-8/#comment-2887821</link>
		<dc:creator>Esthier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2887821</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Did you leave her a tip?

Jim Treacher on October 30, 2009 at 5:53 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sure, I told her:

Rice is great if you&#039;re really hungry and want to eat two thousand of something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Did you leave her a tip?</p>
<p>Jim Treacher on October 30, 2009 at 5:53 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Sure, I told her:</p>
<p>Rice is great if you&#8217;re really hungry and want to eat two thousand of something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Treacher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-8/#comment-2887761</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Treacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2887761</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If carrots got you drunk, rabbits would be f*cked up.

Esthier on October 30, 2009 at 5:47 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Did you leave her a tip?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If carrots got you drunk, rabbits would be f*cked up.</p>
<p>Esthier on October 30, 2009 at 5:47 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Did you leave her a tip?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esthier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-8/#comment-2887760</link>
		<dc:creator>Esthier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2887760</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The collapse of GM didn’t involve the entire credit system of the country freezing, which is the way Paulson explained it to Bush.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, it was a different situation.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Because he told them no and they knew Barack would tell them yes, because NObama was elected by Big Labor, among other groups and GM=UAW.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So you then agree that he wasn&#039;t placed in Obama&#039;s situation, as you seem to be implying that they were biding their time until Obama was in the White House.

&lt;blockquote&gt;President Bush looks like a virtual Scrooge compared to Ogabe!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sure.

&lt;blockquote&gt;I couldn’t find any reference to an agreement on a timetable between Bush and the Iraqis.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

All soldiers out of Iraq by 2011.
&lt;blockquote&gt;
But you said he was following Bush–an argument you’re now abandoning and rightly attributing Porkulus to Nancy.

Jenfidel on October 30, 2009 at 4:46 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Rightly? I thought you were blaming all of this on Obama. See, the whole point of the comment you initially replied to is that Obama hasn&#039;t done much to drastically change this country, at least not yet. Letting Pelosi write the bill when she was clearly in on TARP, isn&#039;t exactly new.

And no, I&#039;m not saying Obama did nothing. I&#039;m just saying he did very little to guide the bill. He didn&#039;t even write it. But I&#039;m also not saying Pelosi did this &lt;em&gt;without &lt;/em&gt;Obama. I&#039;m saying that Obama saw TARP, thought it was good and decided to double down, only he didn&#039;t feel like getting his hands dirty with actual work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The collapse of GM didn’t involve the entire credit system of the country freezing, which is the way Paulson explained it to Bush.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, it was a different situation.</p>
<blockquote><p>Because he told them no and they knew Barack would tell them yes, because NObama was elected by Big Labor, among other groups and GM=UAW.</p></blockquote>
<p>So you then agree that he wasn&#8217;t placed in Obama&#8217;s situation, as you seem to be implying that they were biding their time until Obama was in the White House.</p>
<blockquote><p>President Bush looks like a virtual Scrooge compared to Ogabe!</p></blockquote>
<p>Sure.</p>
<blockquote><p>I couldn’t find any reference to an agreement on a timetable between Bush and the Iraqis.</p></blockquote>
<p>All soldiers out of Iraq by 2011.</p>
<blockquote><p>
But you said he was following Bush–an argument you’re now abandoning and rightly attributing Porkulus to Nancy.</p>
<p>Jenfidel on October 30, 2009 at 4:46 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Rightly? I thought you were blaming all of this on Obama. See, the whole point of the comment you initially replied to is that Obama hasn&#8217;t done much to drastically change this country, at least not yet. Letting Pelosi write the bill when she was clearly in on TARP, isn&#8217;t exactly new.</p>
<p>And no, I&#8217;m not saying Obama did nothing. I&#8217;m just saying he did very little to guide the bill. He didn&#8217;t even write it. But I&#8217;m also not saying Pelosi did this <em>without </em>Obama. I&#8217;m saying that Obama saw TARP, thought it was good and decided to double down, only he didn&#8217;t feel like getting his hands dirty with actual work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esthier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-71-say-palins-unqualified-to-be-president/comment-page-8/#comment-2887741</link>
		<dc:creator>Esthier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70571#comment-2887741</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What did she say?

Jim Treacher on October 30, 2009 at 5:20 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If carrots got you drunk, rabbits would be f*cked up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What did she say?</p>
<p>Jim Treacher on October 30, 2009 at 5:20 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>If carrots got you drunk, rabbits would be f*cked up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
