Western leaders shocked, shocked as Iran plays games on enrichment

posted at 12:46 pm on October 27, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

Iranian mullahs not serious about ending nuclear proliferation?  The deuce you say!  Western leaders find themselves shocked, shocked that the Iranians now want an agreement already reached in principle reworked, in a move that would only surprise those who have been in a coma for the last ten years:

Iran will seek “important changes” in a U.N.-drafted plan to ship enriched uranium out of the country for processing, state TV reported on Tuesday, raising alarm bells among Western leaders who are pushing the deal in hopes of easing concerns over Iran’s nuclear program.

The TV report said Iran would agree to the “general framework” of the plan but also request unspecified changes. That suggests Tehran will accept the idea of sending the uranium abroad — something it had previously appeared reluctant to do — but that there could be a tussle with the U.S. and Europe over how it will be sent and how much.

France’s foreign minister expressed exasperation with Tehran, saying it is trying to have the proposal “thoroughly reworked.” Bernard Kouchner said he doesn’t think the plan needs dramatic changes and warned Iran, “It cannot take forever. We wait for answers.”

The plan was formalized by the United Nations last week after talks between Iran and the United States, Russia and France. It calls for Iran to ship 70 percent of its enriched uranium abroad for further enrichment. The U.S. and its allies back the deal because it would at least temporarily leave Iran’s uranium stockpiles too low to build a nuclear weapon. Iran denies any intention to develop a bomb.

Somewhere in Tehran, a conclave of mullahs are having a good laugh on the West.  “Let’s see how many of them wave their little scraps of paper in the air,” one of them will say, while another suggests, “Perhaps we should have supplied them with umbrellas, too!”

This dodge has a long and utterly predictable dynamic in negotiations between totalitarian states and democracies hoping above all else to avoid confronting them.  Make an agreement, then demand fundamental changes after the leaders have already declared it a victory for peace and understanding.  That forces the leaders of democracies into further concessions to protect their standing at home and to keep the obvious failure of their approach from being seen all at once.

Unfortunately, most of us have seen how this story ends.  While the Western states all chase their own tails to get Iran to agree to anything, Tehran will build its bombs and strike out at its enemies, starting with Israel, secure in the knowledge that their nuclear capability will keep them safe from any other attack.  Until then, we’ll give these Western leaders a Captain Louis Renault Award, with a special Neville Chamberlain umbrella cluster:

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

The current proposal is a total victory for Iran. Their “refinements” will just be icing on the cake. Happy birthday Iran for your thirtieth year of progress.

They need down time on their centrifuge lines to reconfigure for the last levels of refinement for weapon grade uranium and to work out bugs in the new configuration. While they have this down time. Russia or whoever will be providing feed stock of medium grade uranium for the revised lines.

burt on October 27, 2009 at 3:48 PM

Obama told Iran they get the nuke if they let him withdraw from Iraq quietly (the letter). Now our boys are being setup in Afganistan to make sure(look at those supply lines).

Reality Check on October 27, 2009 at 3:52 PM

right2bright:
I mixed up your name with right4life. Relax. You should have been able to figure this out.

dave742 on October 27, 2009 at 3:47 PM

This is what we get…you make a mistake then rather then apologizing, you blame the person who nailed you.
This is why I said you are so weak…a confident strong intelligent person would have recognized that they had made a mistake apologized then moved on.
But you didn’t, so not only does your research stink…you are a weak, immature liberal, which fits the liberal profile.

right2bright on October 27, 2009 at 3:54 PM

They are not the same organization.

it was Hezbollah…as my other link proved.

Obviously, extremists don’t care about anything like obeying treaties, but most people and most countries do. It is only countries like the US that don’t care. Some call these type of nations “rogue nations.”

you think Iran is obeying this treaty? how delusional are you?

Why is me confronting you with your habit of quoting terrorist organizations to support your views “BS”? Don’t you think your views should be supportable by something other than quoting terrorist organizations?

and your views are supported by what again? post your proof that the website is run by the MEK. and my quotes were from Worldnetdaily..and the times of london…yours are from/???

I have no idea what you mean by this. The MEK is supported by the US. The MEK was also intimately responsible for the holding of American hostages, and was directly responsible for killing US citizens and military members. Now you quote websites run by that same group. That’s a weird thing for a patriot to do.

the enemy of my enemy….but yes you are such a patriot..by supporting the anti-semitic ranting of a murderous tyrant like ahmadinajad…you must be an anti-semite.

right4life on October 27, 2009 at 4:04 PM

When Dave is done defending the mullahs, Hezbollah, and his idol the pedophile goat f#cker, maybe he’ll enlighten us again on why he doesn’t believe the Holocaust happened.

PimFortuynsGhost on October 27, 2009 at 4:23 PM

right2bright:

“you make a mistake then rather then apologizing, you blame the person who nailed you.”

I made a mistake in whom I addressed, and you freaked out and called me a fool. Making a mistake on a name does not warrant that response, nor any response. Your response qualifies you as the fool. Maybe you should try nailing me on content, rather than a typing error.

Right4life:

“it was Hezbollah…as my other link proved.”

Prove that Mughniyeh was a member of Hezbollah, and that he was responsible for the Marine blast.

“you think Iran is obeying this treaty?”

Yes, of course they are. It is the US that is in violation of the NPT.

“post your proof that the website (Iran Focus) is run by the MEK”

First, let’s look at the person who owns the site. Mohammad Hanif Jazayeri is the Sole Director of the site (1), and essentially runs the site single handed (a man named Javid Akbari has been called the websites “co-director” (2), but his name appears on the web very rarely, and has never appeared in the MSM). Mohammad’s father was a member of the MEK, and Mohammad claims that his father was killed by the Iranian government because of this. Motivated by his father’s death, Mohammad is now working to get the MEK removed from the terrorist list. (3) Jazayeri is also associated with two other organizations as well, one of which is called “Gulf Intelligence Monitor.” This organization has no official presence of the web, and is mentioned only one time in the mainstream press, in an Agence France Presse article (4) where they described the organization as a “research institute.” This “institute” has two people associated with it: the Sole Director, whose name is Abraham Rad Kian, and Jazayeri, who became the Secretary (5) in 2003 (at the age of 19) when he replaced the original secretary after he resigned the same day that he was hired. In reality, this “research institute” is a phantom organization which is used to give credibility to statements made by other members of the MEK. For example, Iran Focus can write an article that says, “According to Simon Bailey of the London-based Gulf Intelligence Monitor” (6), and it sounds impressive, even though “Gulf Intelligence Monitor” does not exist in reality. Simon Bailey may likewise not exist. Jazayeri is also the Secretary for the International Committee for a Free Iran, another two person organization which lobbies governments to try and get the MEK taken off the terrorist lists. This organization also has no official web presence and has never appeared in the MSM. Jazayeri also gives 5 star reviews on Amazon for books written by MEK members, and one star reviews of books by respected authors that the FBI uses for its reports on the MEK. (7)
Further evidence that Mo Jazayeri is part of the MEK is found through a person named Laila Jazayeri. Laila is a relative of Mo Jazayeri (probably his mother) (8), and it is clear that she is also an MEK member. She is the Sole Director of another MEK-run one person company called the Association of Anglo-Iranian Women. She uses this company in the same way Mohammad uses Gulf Intelligence Monitor, as a credibility tool. Her pro-MEK remarks that appear repeatedly on MEK websites are listed as coming from the Association of Anglo-American Women, and it appears respectable (9). For example, when Maryam Rajavi (the MEK cult-leader), was arrested in France, ten MEK members set themselves on fire in protest, and two died as a result. Laila Jazayeri “director of the Association of Iranian Women in the UK,” called these people “the cream of Iranian intellectual society.” (10) Even the wensite “Regime Change Iran” lists Iran Focus as an “MEK webiste”:

http://regimechangeiran.blogspot.com/2005_07_24_regimechangeiran_archive.html

Iran Focus is essentially a single individual who is a member of a terrorist organization who started his own website in order to pass along MEK propaganda masquerading as news.

1) You can check it here: who.godaddy.com/WhoIsVerify.aspx?domain=iranfocus.com&prog_id=godaddy
2) wiesenthal.com/site/apps/nl/content2.asp?c=fwLYKnN8LzH&b=245494&ct=2143035
3) Hillingdon Times, “News analysis: Freedom fighter,” March 31, 2005 hillingdontimes.co.uk/news/waronterror/display.var.583972.0.news_analysis_freedom_fighter.php
4) AFP, “Experts warn that Iran’s nuclear menace is real”, Sept.21, 2005
A copy is here: lebanonwire.com/0905/05092107AFP.asp
5) Company information in the UK can be obtained from ICC Directors database on Lexis Nexis: w3.nexis.com/sources/scripts/info.pl?167638 . If you want to check it, I think you can do so for a fee.
6) iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=4604
7) Here are Jazayeri’s book reviews on Amazon: amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A3D9MY0MK3E5Z5/ref=cm_cr_auth/002-1020660-8512838?ie=UTF8&sort%5Fby=MostRecentReview
Mohammad Mohaddessin is chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the NCRI (see ncr-iran.org/content/view/146/152/). The NCRI is equivalent to the MEK (see fas.org/irp/world/para/mek-usca070904.pdf) and is also listed as a terrorist organization. Jazayeri gives Mohaddesin’s book 5 stars. Ervand Abrahamian is the leading expert on the MEK, and is the main source used by the FBI and Congress (see note 9). Abrahamian gives an accurate portrayal of the MEK, which is that they are an extremist, terrorist, cult. Jazayeri gives Abrahamian’s book one star.
8) Laila Jazayeri is the Sole Director of a one-person company called AIW, Ltd., which is the Association of Anglo-Iranian Women. The address given for the registration of this company by Laila Jazayeri is the same address given by Mo Jazayeri for Iran Focus. This can be checked through the ICC database in Lexis Nexis (See note 14). I will not give the number for privacy reasons, but the address is on Colet Gardens Road in London. If these two people live in the same house and have the same last name, it is safe to assume that they are related. Laila is 23 years older than Mohammad, so she may be his mother.
9) Here are some examples, all of which are from either Maryam Rajavi’s website, or from the NCRI site, which is a front for the MEK (see note 16): maryam-rajavi.com/content/view/503/1/ , maryam-rajavi.com/content/view/505/1/ , ncr-iran.org/content/view/3087/152/ , ncr-iran.org/content/view/3993/128/ , ncr-iran.org/content/view/884/1/ , ncr-iran.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3163&Itemid=152 , ncr-iran.org/content/view/3568/152/ ,
10) findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_20030701/ai_n12699162

“and my quotes were from Worldnetdaily”

And you WND article says it is “according to Iran Focus”

dave742 on October 27, 2009 at 4:27 PM

Prove that Mughniyeh was a member of Hezbollah, and that he was responsible for the Marine blast.

I just did, with the times of london article. truth hurts.

Yes, of course they are. It is the US that is in violation of the NPT.

this is laughable BS. I would ask if you were for real..but its obvious you are an anti-semitic nut-job.

http://regimechangeiran.blogspot.com/2005_07_24_regimechangeiran_archive.html

some blogspot?? this is your source? who cares? all that drivel is so much BS…even if the MEK does run that web site…is what they say true? and it obviously is…HIZBULLAH WAS BEHIND THE BEIRUT BOMBING….and IRAN RUNS HIZBULLAH..

Iran is at war with the US…and they have been for 30 years…they’re going to get a nuke, because of scum like you…and I hope they deliver one to a neighborhood near you.

get a clue.

right4life on October 27, 2009 at 4:37 PM

Right4life:
Doon’t be too upset about quoting a terrorist group. Senator Sessions quotes them as well. One of the quotes even ended up in a bill in COngress;

http://bulk.resource.org/gpo.gov/bills/110/h1062ih.txt.pdf

The US Congress quotes terrorists! Funny.

dave742 on October 27, 2009 at 4:39 PM

Doon’t be too upset about quoting a terrorist group. Senator Sessions quotes them as well. One of the quotes even ended up in a bill in COngress;

I don’t buy your ASSertion..supported by some wacko blog…

apparently you’re not too upset at the planned elimination of 6 million or so jews….that would put you in league with a certain anti-semite with a funny little moustache…

right4life on October 27, 2009 at 4:43 PM

right4life:

this is your source?

I had many sources. Maybe you didn’t notice.

I just did, with the times of london article. truth hurts.

Your Times of London does not even mention the Beirut incident. In order to prove someone is responsible for something, you have to actually mention the incident. They do say the he was a member of Hezbollah. This is a baseless accusation, not proof.

HIZBULLAH WAS BEHIND THE BEIRUT BOMBING

The circumstantial evidence that is available says that this is untrue. Even if it were, so what. When a military occupies another country, there is no legal reason they cannot be attacked. If Hezbollah sets up a barracks in Boston,I will attack them myself (not suicide, though).

dave742 on October 27, 2009 at 4:48 PM

I had many sources. Maybe you didn’t notice.

oh yea right…

wiesenthal.com/site/apps/nl/content2.asp?c=fwLYKnN8LzH&b=245494&ct=2143035
3) Hillingdon Times, “News analysis: Freedom fighter,” March 31, 2005 hillingdontimes.co.uk/news/waronterror/display.var.583972.0.news_analysis_freedom_fighter.php

who are these people? and who cares?

Your Times of London does not even mention the Beirut incident. In order to prove someone is responsible for something, you have to actually mention the incident. They do say the he was a member of Hezbollah. This is a baseless accusation, not proof.

yeah the US had a 25 MILLION DOLLAR bounty on him because he failed to deliver some girl scout cookies!!!

laugahble.

The circumstantial evidence that is available says that this is untrue. Even if it were, so what. When a military occupies another country, there is no legal reason they cannot be attacked. If Hezbollah sets up a barracks in Boston,I will attack them myself (not suicide, though

and when a country run by an anti-semitic dictator tries to get a nuclear weapon, there is no legal reason they cannot be attacked.

you anti-semitic wacko.

right4life on October 27, 2009 at 4:52 PM

supported by some wacko blog

Look. The blog reference is not even included in my normal spiel regarding this issue. (Check the web to see my long post printed elsewhere.) I only included it here to show that even a blog that wants regime change in Iran still has the baseline intelligence to realize that Iran Focus is the MEK. This is clear from everything else in my post, which you do not have the ability to read. I guess the intelligence level at the “wacko” Regimechangeiran surpasses that at HA.

dave742 on October 27, 2009 at 4:53 PM

who are these people?

Jazayeri is the sole operator of Iran Focus. Can you read?

dave742 on October 27, 2009 at 4:54 PM

dave742 on October 27, 2009 at 4:53 PM

again this is just blowing smoke to hide the real issue…you support an anti-semitic dictator. and want them to get nuclear weapons…and use them against israel. you are for the murder of millions of jews.

right4life on October 27, 2009 at 4:54 PM

Does Obama know the words potassium iodide?

Or does he think we just can hide in emptied refridgerators like in the movies?

The country hired a smarmy soft shoe entertainer when it needed a Charles Martel.

Obama belongs in a third rate casino greeting drunken guests.

Not facing down nuke-thieving theocratic maniacs.

With Joe “Hindu Dunkin’ Donuts” Biden mugging in the backround.

Lord help the Republic.

profitsbeard on October 27, 2009 at 5:09 PM

I made a mistake in whom I addressed, and you freaked out and called me a fool. Making a mistake on a name does not warrant that response, nor any response. Your response qualifies you as the fool. Maybe you should try nailing me on content, rather than a typing error.dave742 on October 27, 2009 at 4:27 PM

YOU made the mistake, not me, I blasted you for poor research…and you still can’t find it in you to apologize, even when it is so blatant.
Go ahead an call me whatever names you like…in fact post anything you like, we now know if you make a mistake you won’t apologize.
Did you ever think that if you would have apologized and explained your error, that it would be returned in favor…of course not…thus the weak and fool label you wear.

right2bright on October 27, 2009 at 5:35 PM

right4life on October 27, 2009 at 4:54 PM

right2bright on October 27, 2009 at 3:54 PM


Dave742 voted for Cynthia Mckinney for President.


Here’s a little background on who super smart dave742 wants to run the country:

Cynthia McKinneyThe rep who cries racism.
By Chris SuellentropPosted Friday, April 19, 2002, at 10:45 AM ET
http://www.slate.com/?id=2064530

All of us have voices in our heads, whispering insanities. Rep. Cynthia McKinney’s problem is that she lets hers speak. She’s the Christopher Walken character in Annie Hall, except when she’s tempted to swerve into a car’s oncoming headlights, she actually does it.

After all, she’s not the first liberal to spin the fantasy that President Bush had advance knowledge of the Sept. 11 attacks, which McKinney insinuated last month during a radio interview with a Berkeley, Calif., station.


Cynthia McKinney and the Alleged 5,000 Dead Hurricane Katrina Inmates

http://www.nolanchart.com/article5123.html

OAKLAND, CA – Cynthia McKinney, Green Party Presidential candidate, charged the Department of Defense with the cover-up of 5,000 execution-style deaths during the chaotic aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in September 2005 on September 28. She related that an anonymous mother told her that her son had processed 5,000 corpses, mostly male, with a single bullet wound to the head and entered the results into a Pentagon computer. The mother stated that the son had signed a confidentiality agreement and could not legally talk, and that the bodies were dumped into the swamp. Listen to her statement here.

Credibility,facts,and being in touch with reality is not a strong point for Dave”I worship the coming of the 12th Iman”742 here.

Baxter Greene on October 27, 2009 at 5:54 PM

Dave”I worship the coming of the 12th Iman”742 here.

Baxter Greene on October 27, 2009 at 5:54 PM

LOL thats great!!

yeah it sounds like Davey will be first in line to get the Mahdi’s mark

right4life on October 27, 2009 at 6:01 PM

right2bright:

I blasted you for poor research…Did you ever think that if you would have apologized and explained your error, that it would be returned in favor…of course not…thus the weak and fool label you wear.

OK. You are right.

TO ALL HOT AIR READERS:

I was in a discussion with right4life, and in one of my responses to him/her, I accidentally addressed him/her as right2bright. These names are somwhat similar-with the number contained in the middle of each and all, but of course this is no excuse. This obviously shows “poor research” on my part, and when I was “blasted” for it, it was certainly warranted. I apologize to all for making this inexcusable error, and will do everything in my power to ensure that it does not happen again. All I can hope for is that you will accept my heartfelt apology for the inadvertant name mixup, and I hope it has not offended nor harmed anyone. Please forgive me, as Jesus would.

dave742 on October 27, 2009 at 6:07 PM

France’s foreign minister expressed exasperation with Tehran, saying it is trying to have the proposal “thoroughly reworked.” Bernard Kouchner said he doesn’t think the plan needs dramatic changes and warned Iran, “It cannot take forever. We wait for answers.”

Not to worry it won’t take forever, only until they have their nukes. Also, don’t worry, you diplomats will have your prestigious, cushy, do nothing jobs right up to the point that Iran gets their nukes and than you’ll be sent off to do similar work, with similar results elsewhere in the world.

RJL on October 27, 2009 at 6:28 PM

Comment pages: 1 2