Comments on: Video: Scozzafava accepts Margaret Sanger Award

By: Sarah Palin Backed Hoffman Severely Beats out Scozzafava in polls; Dede Withdraws; GOP switches support to Hoffman « VotingFemale Speaks!

Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:35:50 +0000

[...] GOP Chairman Writes Off Scozzafava The Weekly Standard: Dede’s Losing, Call the Cops Hot Air: Video: Scozzafava accepts Margaret Sanger Award and Too good to check: Hoffman leading in NY-23? Karl Rove, Wall Street Journal: Tuesday’s [...]

By: When Heroes Fail Us « The Pachyderms Are Annoyed

When Heroes Fail Us « The Pachyderms Are Annoyed — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:55:08 +0000

[...] supported by ACORN, who’s backed by unions, who’s backed tax and spend stupidity, and who recently won – and accepted – the Margaret Sanger Award for “leadership, excellence, and outstanding contributions to the reproductive health and [...]

By: unclesmrgol

unclesmrgol — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:28:51 +0000

But killing in itself is morally neutral as is abortion.

thuja on October 26, 2009 at 6:20 PM

A human is an animal. Got it. Therefore it is never murder to kill a human. Got it.

By: Driefromseattle

Driefromseattle — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:00:25 +0000

My Cherokee blood has turned cold.

By: calbear

calbear — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:21:22 +0000

NoDonkey on October 26, 2009 at 10:10 PM

Either you have severe reading comprehension problems, or you were so desperate to recycle SKYFOX’s remark that you decided to ignore what I actually wrote.

Either way, sad.

By: JakeRightThought

JakeRightThought — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:03:02 +0000

So, when does the baby get to have human rights?

“When she can breathe.”

Fascists love to kill people. That’s what they do.
Hitler had his gas ovens. Sadam Hussein had his rape rooms. Pro-death people support abortion mills.

“When do they get human rights?”
The fascists will tell you that they get human rights when THEY say that they are to get human rights.
Fascist don’t just want to be in charge, they want to be in charge of who lives and who dies. ‘Abortion? Why not? Euthanasia? The more the merrier. Death panels? Of course.’

By: volsense

volsense — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:33:31 +0000

Time to trade our RINOs for their Blue Dogs and start all over.

By: volsense

volsense — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:32:01 +0000

It had to happen to Newt. The man who has an answer for everything exposed as not having a real answer for anything. Time to put these RINO dinosaurs out to pasture. Newt is another prime example that liberalism is a mental disorder and effect the left or the right depending on whether you can maintain your values. Newt obviously couldn’t.

By: erakis

erakis — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:37:24 +0000

Who would want to win an award named after someone whose radical Eugenecist beliefs inspired the holocaust, and whose racist vitriol empowered groups like the KKK.

THOSE are not American values.

But, that’s par for the course for the morally ambiguous universe of the left.

By: SouperConservative

SouperConservative — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:14:05 +0000

So, when does the baby get to have human rights?

“When she can breathe.”

Cricket624 on October 27, 2009 at 8:37 AM

By that standard, it’s okay to kill people by smothering them or turning off their oxygen tanks. So the next time you go to the mall and see someone walking around carrying their portable oxygen tank, go ahead and turn the dial to off. It’s no different than abortion.

By: ORconservative

ORconservative — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:51:21 +0000

Newt is all about Newt and power. The guy now has as much credibility as Obama and I can not even watch him.
Dede will likely lose this race and likely she can get a job fundraising for Planned Parenthood or Nambla or something.
She doesn’t concern me. Newt, however, appears indicative of a larger much more serious problem.
And btw, I am turning the TV off whenever FOX has him on.

By: Cricket624

Cricket624 — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:37:44 +0000

I always like to ask abortionists one question: when does life begin? Few can answer the question immediately, and their hesitation telegaraphs the fact that they know there’s a conflict in their reasoning. Put another way, many don’t ask this question of themselves because they know in their hearts where it will lead.

I have known just one abortionist who answered quickly and honestly, with these words, “probably at conception.”

So, when does the baby get to have human rights?

“When she can breathe.”

He acknowledged that it sounded cruel, but that, “as a pro-choice person, I have to accept the fact that abortion is usually killing a viable infant.”

He calls himself a “moral relativist.” Very honest. But cold, man. Very, very cold.

By: Cricket624

Cricket624 — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:21:13 +0000

Who’s the dude getting the award?

LtE126 on October 27, 2009 at 6:43 AM

Classic. Cruel, but she’s not reading this.

Still classic.

By: Loxodonta

Loxodonta — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:01:15 +0000

How small of all that human hearts endure That part which laws or kings can cause or cure! Still to ourselves in every place ensigned Our own felicity we make or find. — Samuel Johnson (1709-1784) Not only did she get the quote wrong, but it boggles my mind that she can warp its meaning into approving the passage of laws which cause small human hearts to endure the pain and death of abortion so that some people gain a bit more felicity. Right through the last month of pregnancy, if desired, for the mother's "health." But then, liberals do tend to warp the meaning of words to suit the gratification of their own political and selfish desires. So, there's that.

By: JaqobJackson

JaqobJackson — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:57:22 +0000

Every Embryology textbook clearly states that HUMAN LIFE BEGINS AT CONCEPTION - not some time before or after that moment. When human life begins is not a matter of opinion or theory. They can WATCH IT HAPPENING THROUGH A MICROSCOPE! Anyone who states that its OK to violently murder babies anytime after conception is evil and must be opposed and kept out of all offices local, state & national.

By: yoda

yoda — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:20:47 +0000

Do all these left leaning, baby killing women come from some factory?
They all look alike.
Jeff from WI on October 27, 2009 at 6:23 AM

One those big ones from Caterpillar?

By: LtE126

LtE126 — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:43:23 +0000

Who’s the dude getting the award?

By: Jeff from WI

Jeff from WI — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:23:34 +0000

Do all these left leaning, baby killing women come from some factory?
They all look alike.

By: Jeff from WI

Jeff from WI — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:27:36 +0000

Getting back to the point of this thread, the support of this woman, this Democrat in disguise, by the GOP, one has to wonder. We rightly accuse the Democrats of having no core principles, no line that they won’t cross to win; the Republicans are showing the exact same void of principle by backing a pro-abortion candidate. Evidently, dead babies mean nothing to Newt, and the GOP leaders, if they can support a baby killer.

By: Dollayo

Dollayo — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:22:19 +0000

I like what she said at 1:20

“..each person is an individual, with his or her own rights, and when you look at it that way a lot of issues become very simple. Issues that are seemingly complex become simple”

Yes, simple, ‘common sense’ one might call these words. How can anyone who truly believes this support killing unborn children in the womb? Is she just throwing out words with no meaning to fill in space? Who wrote this? This seems like a total disconnect to me.

By: leftnomore

leftnomore — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:43:45 +0000

Just another dykey, homely liberal woman. She belongs in the administration, with about 30 others just like her.

By: Newt versus Conservatism – NY23 Style « Unalienable Rights

Newt versus Conservatism – NY23 Style « Unalienable Rights — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:42:11 +0000

[...] Newt could not be more off base here. He is playing politics, plain and simple. What he fails to understand is that the Republican party should not be looking for the people to come and support it, but rather they should be going to the people to support them! This is a Constitutional Representative Republic. We the people are the foundation of this great country, not a party or group or government. It is about time that the RINOs and establishment Republicans realize that the people are conservative by nature. Just see the latest Gallup poll: Now, I am not a one issue voter, however, if you get past her 15% conservative rating, her pro stimulus stance, her pro-gay marriage support, and her support for extending and raising taxes, then the nail that seals the coffin is the her pro-abortion stance. [...]

By: gary4205

gary4205 — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:25:52 +0000

Don’t forget, Sanger was an associate of the Ku Klux Klan. She spoke to many Klan meetings. She is on record calling blacks “human weeds.”

Nice, huh?

By: Mojave Mark

Mojave Mark — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:13:10 +0000

The Sanger award really does represent the most human life destroyed on purpose. How many worldwide abortions have there been. It’s in the hundreds of millions. The Mao award would be next followed by the Stalin and then the Hitler award.

This lady and people like her make me sick.

By: unclesmrgol

unclesmrgol — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:48:41 +0000

You can tell the man who boozes by the company he chooses — and the pig got up and slowly walked away.