<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Too good to check: Hoffman leading in NY-23?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 07:15:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Devils Game from Georgia &#124; BitsBlog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-3/#comment-2890122</link>
		<dc:creator>The Devils Game from Georgia &#124; BitsBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2890122</guid>
		<description>[...] a certain grain of salt, given the source of the polling, and the fact that the polling result is only marginally outside the abnormally high margin of error.) Frankly, I wonder how that&#8217;s going to play, even absent voter fraud as so many areas of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a certain grain of salt, given the source of the polling, and the fact that the polling result is only marginally outside the abnormally high margin of error.) Frankly, I wonder how that&#8217;s going to play, even absent voter fraud as so many areas of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Hoffman Takes Lead in Poll &#171; The American Catholic</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-3/#comment-2874773</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hoffman Takes Lead in Poll &#171; The American Catholic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2874773</guid>
		<description>[...] this with more than a grain of salt, since the Club for Growth supports him, but in the latest poll by the Club for Growth Doug Hoffman, the pro-life Conservative Party candidate  in the special election in the New York [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this with more than a grain of salt, since the Club for Growth supports him, but in the latest poll by the Club for Growth Doug Hoffman, the pro-life Conservative Party candidate  in the special election in the New York [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SukieTawdry</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-3/#comment-2874665</link>
		<dc:creator>SukieTawdry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2874665</guid>
		<description>Time to send Hoffman some more money for the final push. A caller to one the radio shows today was calling as he drove from Michigan to NY-23 because Hoffman needs boots on the ground. If I were within driving distance, I&#039;d go, too. 

Gingrich was on Michael Medved&#039;s show today reiterating why he endorsed Dede. Normally Medved&#039;s staunchly anti-third party, but not in this case mainly because there was no primary. Newt emphasized that there were &lt;em&gt;four&lt;/em&gt; meetings by the GOP &quot;selection committee&quot; and Hoffman lost in all four. His attitude was that these party officials knew best and everyone else should defer to their wishes. Newt, my man, you screwed the pooch on this one (&lt;em&gt;especially&lt;/em&gt; if Hoffman ends up winning). Big time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to send Hoffman some more money for the final push. A caller to one the radio shows today was calling as he drove from Michigan to NY-23 because Hoffman needs boots on the ground. If I were within driving distance, I&#8217;d go, too. </p>
<p>Gingrich was on Michael Medved&#8217;s show today reiterating why he endorsed Dede. Normally Medved&#8217;s staunchly anti-third party, but not in this case mainly because there was no primary. Newt emphasized that there were <em>four</em> meetings by the GOP &#8220;selection committee&#8221; and Hoffman lost in all four. His attitude was that these party officials knew best and everyone else should defer to their wishes. Newt, my man, you screwed the pooch on this one (<em>especially</em> if Hoffman ends up winning). Big time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Too good to check: Hoffman leading in NY-23? &#124; Legal-Sleaze.com</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-3/#comment-2873637</link>
		<dc:creator>Too good to check: Hoffman leading in NY-23? &#124; Legal-Sleaze.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2873637</guid>
		<description>[...] Read this post &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read this post &raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jainphx</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-3/#comment-2873511</link>
		<dc:creator>jainphx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2873511</guid>
		<description>Today was the first time that I ever changed the channel on Rush&#039;s show. Mark Taylor had me so mad I couldn&#039;t listen anymore. His Newt Gingrich speech had me in fits, it&#039;s people like him that would rather have a Republican vote Democrap than the actual Democrap, that makes us conservatives so irate and not vote.

 Rush I love ya but never again with Mark Taylor please&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today was the first time that I ever changed the channel on Rush&#8217;s show. Mark Taylor had me so mad I couldn&#8217;t listen anymore. His Newt Gingrich speech had me in fits, it&#8217;s people like him that would rather have a Republican vote Democrap than the actual Democrap, that makes us conservatives so irate and not vote.</p>
<p> Rush I love ya but never again with Mark Taylor please&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sapwolf</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-3/#comment-2873472</link>
		<dc:creator>Sapwolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2873472</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;gary4205 on October 26, 2009 at 3:48 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Excellent post!

You understand the eternal struggle we are in.

It is a struggle as old as when one angel led a third down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>gary4205 on October 26, 2009 at 3:48 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Excellent post!</p>
<p>You understand the eternal struggle we are in.</p>
<p>It is a struggle as old as when one angel led a third down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sapwolf</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-3/#comment-2873451</link>
		<dc:creator>Sapwolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2873451</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

FYI, Hannity, who is a good buddy of Newt, is sayin how great it is that Sarah endorsed Hoffman. He wasn’t parsing his words either. WOW, Hannity really is a conservative and not a GOP ho.

Geochelone on October 26, 2009 at 3:16 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That blew me away when I heard that on Sean&#039;s radio show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>FYI, Hannity, who is a good buddy of Newt, is sayin how great it is that Sarah endorsed Hoffman. He wasn’t parsing his words either. WOW, Hannity really is a conservative and not a GOP ho.</p>
<p>Geochelone on October 26, 2009 at 3:16 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>That blew me away when I heard that on Sean&#8217;s radio show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clyde5445</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-3/#comment-2873448</link>
		<dc:creator>Clyde5445</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2873448</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Oil Can on October 26, 2009 at 1:07 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
More times than not here in NY the R&#039;s &amp; C&#039;s run on the same party line but the R&#039;s screw up so bad it left an opening for a C to get on the ticket. That how this became a three way race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Oil Can on October 26, 2009 at 1:07 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>More times than not here in NY the R&#8217;s &amp; C&#8217;s run on the same party line but the R&#8217;s screw up so bad it left an opening for a C to get on the ticket. That how this became a three way race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AH_C</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-2/#comment-2873434</link>
		<dc:creator>AH_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2873434</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hoffman wins in a landslide if he will just for pete’s sake use some Teeth Whitener.

Good grief, what a lousy pic.

klickink.wordpress.com on October 26, 2009 at 1:28 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Beck had the perfect analogy for that last week, using two gleaming skyscrapers vs a building that looked like it was covered in second-run windows.  Conservatives are looking or substance, not style, nor glamour.  

Does it help to have style &amp; glam a la Sarah?  No. If it did, then explain Scuzzi, sKerry, dishWaters, Paleloser, Dingy Harry etc, etc.  Style and glam only helps to fundamental flaws, i.e. Obambi, Crispy, yes, even Newtie.

Does it hurt to be rough &amp; unpolished? No. Refer to the above short list.

But if ya wanna talk about looks, Hoffman don&#039;t look bad next to those two</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hoffman wins in a landslide if he will just for pete’s sake use some Teeth Whitener.</p>
<p>Good grief, what a lousy pic.</p>
<p>klickink.wordpress.com on October 26, 2009 at 1:28 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Beck had the perfect analogy for that last week, using two gleaming skyscrapers vs a building that looked like it was covered in second-run windows.  Conservatives are looking or substance, not style, nor glamour.  </p>
<p>Does it help to have style &amp; glam a la Sarah?  No. If it did, then explain Scuzzi, sKerry, dishWaters, Paleloser, Dingy Harry etc, etc.  Style and glam only helps to fundamental flaws, i.e. Obambi, Crispy, yes, even Newtie.</p>
<p>Does it hurt to be rough &amp; unpolished? No. Refer to the above short list.</p>
<p>But if ya wanna talk about looks, Hoffman don&#8217;t look bad next to those two</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AH_C</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-2/#comment-2873409</link>
		<dc:creator>AH_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2873409</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So I ask again — has anyone actually vetted this Hoffman guy???

Outlander on October 26, 2009 at 1:24 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;And so we answered you yesterday in the other thread.  Essentially you&#039;re nit-picking an unknown claiming to be conservative, while the other two are committed to anti-conservative causes.  

This is a no-brainer and further validated by the fact that Hoffman is a small business owner.  My vote goes to the business owner over a professional politician or community organizer.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So I ask again — has anyone actually vetted this Hoffman guy???</p>
<p>Outlander on October 26, 2009 at 1:24 PM</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>And so we answered you yesterday in the other thread.  Essentially you&#8217;re nit-picking an unknown claiming to be conservative, while the other two are committed to anti-conservative causes.  </p>
<p>This is a no-brainer and further validated by the fact that Hoffman is a small business owner.  My vote goes to the business owner over a professional politician or community organizer.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AH_C</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-2/#comment-2873389</link>
		<dc:creator>AH_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2873389</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So we have a GOP with &lt;strike&gt;defectors&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;strong&gt;defects&lt;/strong&gt; like Snowe and Collins, and outright turncoats like Spector.

hawksruleva on October 26, 2009 at 1:17 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
FIFY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So we have a GOP with <strike>defectors</strike> <strong>defects</strong> like Snowe and Collins, and outright turncoats like Spector.</p>
<p>hawksruleva on October 26, 2009 at 1:17 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>FIFY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AH_C</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-2/#comment-2873375</link>
		<dc:creator>AH_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2873375</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;    For the good of the GOP, Scuzza should withdraw and support Hoffman.

    rbj on October 26, 2009 at 12:29 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;No. The best thing for the GOP is for Scozzafava to get beaten by the Conservative candidate through votes from actual voters. That’s the most effective message to party leadership. NY-23 has become the rallying point for the soul of the GOP. If real voters reject the party’s chosen candidate for an actual Conservative that will reverberate much more than if that candidate just quit.

JonPrichard on October 26, 2009 at 1:09 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
^5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>    For the good of the GOP, Scuzza should withdraw and support Hoffman.</p>
<p>    rbj on October 26, 2009 at 12:29 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>No. The best thing for the GOP is for Scozzafava to get beaten by the Conservative candidate through votes from actual voters. That’s the most effective message to party leadership. NY-23 has become the rallying point for the soul of the GOP. If real voters reject the party’s chosen candidate for an actual Conservative that will reverberate much more than if that candidate just quit.</p>
<p>JonPrichard on October 26, 2009 at 1:09 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>^5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ericdondero</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-2/#comment-2873297</link>
		<dc:creator>ericdondero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2873297</guid>
		<description>Scozzafava will still be a NY State Assemblywoman if she loses, and presumably with the Republican Party.  

If she loses, which appears now she will, we on the Right do not want to go overboard with our denunciations of her, and give her no choice but to switch parties to the Democrats.  That would be a post-election embarrassment for the Republican Party.

So, please, you all, criticize her, but save the harshness for the Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scozzafava will still be a NY State Assemblywoman if she loses, and presumably with the Republican Party.  </p>
<p>If she loses, which appears now she will, we on the Right do not want to go overboard with our denunciations of her, and give her no choice but to switch parties to the Democrats.  That would be a post-election embarrassment for the Republican Party.</p>
<p>So, please, you all, criticize her, but save the harshness for the Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clement</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-2/#comment-2873202</link>
		<dc:creator>clement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2873202</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
–Gary (or anyone who lives in the area), does a 48% GOP/36% Dem sample make sense? It seems to me that it’s too high for the GOP.

Jimbo3 on October 26, 2009 at 5:29 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Current voter rolls in the district show 43/31 Republican/Dem split. Which would put both parties a little high by an equal 5%. When you figure that people registered with a party are more likely to vote than those not it is not totally out of reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
–Gary (or anyone who lives in the area), does a 48% GOP/36% Dem sample make sense? It seems to me that it’s too high for the GOP.</p>
<p>Jimbo3 on October 26, 2009 at 5:29 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Current voter rolls in the district show 43/31 Republican/Dem split. Which would put both parties a little high by an equal 5%. When you figure that people registered with a party are more likely to vote than those not it is not totally out of reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vntnrse</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-2/#comment-2873045</link>
		<dc:creator>Vntnrse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2873045</guid>
		<description>Hoffman got off Hanity&#039;s radio show a littlew while ago and Beck is about to talk to him on television.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoffman got off Hanity&#8217;s radio show a littlew while ago and Beck is about to talk to him on television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HondaV65</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-2/#comment-2873022</link>
		<dc:creator>HondaV65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2873022</guid>
		<description>I think this is an optimistic poll.  Because it&#039;s just NY-23 Congressional - the polling resolution is pretty low.  This give CFG a chance to &quot;push&quot; the voters by releasing a poll like this.  It will probably be days before this can be refuted.  A dastardly tactic - yet exactly what I&#039;d expect from grass roots radicals like CFG - I like them!  They know what it&#039;s going to take to win!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is an optimistic poll.  Because it&#8217;s just NY-23 Congressional &#8211; the polling resolution is pretty low.  This give CFG a chance to &#8220;push&#8221; the voters by releasing a poll like this.  It will probably be days before this can be refuted.  A dastardly tactic &#8211; yet exactly what I&#8217;d expect from grass roots radicals like CFG &#8211; I like them!  They know what it&#8217;s going to take to win!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBinSTL</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-2/#comment-2873016</link>
		<dc:creator>TBinSTL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2873016</guid>
		<description>As always, turnout is the key and I think Hoffman has the advantage in the &quot;motivated voters&quot; category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, turnout is the key and I think Hoffman has the advantage in the &#8220;motivated voters&#8221; category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimbo3</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-2/#comment-2872997</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimbo3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2872997</guid>
		<description>WITH WHICH POLITICAL PARTY ARE YOU REGISTERED?

108 36.0 DEMOCRAT
&lt;strong&gt;145 48.3 REPUBLICAN&lt;/strong&gt;
40 13.3 INDEPENDENT/NO PARTY
2 0.7 CONSERVATIVE
1 0.3 OTHER
4 1.3 REFUSED

--Gary (or anyone who lives in the area), does a 48% GOP/36% Dem sample make sense?  It seems to me that it&#039;s too high for the GOP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WITH WHICH POLITICAL PARTY ARE YOU REGISTERED?</p>
<p>108 36.0 DEMOCRAT<br />
<strong>145 48.3 REPUBLICAN</strong><br />
40 13.3 INDEPENDENT/NO PARTY<br />
2 0.7 CONSERVATIVE<br />
1 0.3 OTHER<br />
4 1.3 REFUSED</p>
<p>&#8211;Gary (or anyone who lives in the area), does a 48% GOP/36% Dem sample make sense?  It seems to me that it&#8217;s too high for the GOP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary4205</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-2/#comment-2872920</link>
		<dc:creator>gary4205</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2872920</guid>
		<description>Internals from the CFG poll:

AS YOU MIGHT KNOW, ON NOVEMBER 3RD THERE WILL BE LOCAL ELECTIONS AND A SPECIAL ELECTION FOR CONGRESS IN YOUR AREA TO FILL THE SEAT BEING VACATED BY CONGRESSMAN JOHN MCHUGH. USUALLY, VERY FEW PEOPLE VOTE IN SPECIAL ELECTIONS LIKE THESE. 

HOW LIKELY ARE YOU TO VOTE IN THE
UPCOMING LOCAL ELECTIONS AND THE SPECIAL ELECTION FOR CONGRESS? WOULD YOU SAY YOU ARE VERY LIKELY TO VOTE, SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO VOTE, OR NOT LIKELY TO VOTE? IF YOU ARE NOT REGISTERED TO VOTE IN NEW YORK, JUST SAY SO.


300 100.0 VERY LIKELY


IF YOU HAD TO LABEL YOURSELF, WOULD YOU SAY YOU ARE A LIBERAL, A MODERATE, OR A CONSERVATIVE IN YOUR POLITICAL BELIEFS?



55 18.3 LIBERAL
92 30.7 MODERATE
&lt;strong&gt;123 41.0 CONSERAVTIVE&lt;/strong&gt;
61 20.3 Smwht Conservative
62 20.7 Very Conservative
30 10.0 DK/REFUSED



WITH WHICH POLITICAL PARTY ARE YOU REGISTERED?


108 36.0 DEMOCRAT
145 48.3 REPUBLICAN
40 13.3 INDEPENDENT/NO PARTY
2 0.7 CONSERVATIVE
1 0.3 OTHER
4 1.3 REFUSED




WHAT IS THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE FACING THE UNITED STATES TODAY THAT YOU WOULD MOST LIKE TO SEE YOUR MEMBER OF CONGRESS MAKE HIS OR HER TOP PRIORITY?


72 24.0 HEALTH CARE/REFORM
67 22.3 ECONOMY
32 10.7 UNEMPLOYMENT/JOBS
26 8.7 WAR/IRAQ/AFGHAN
13 4.3 REDUCE TAXES
9 3.0 HEALTH INS./AFFORD
7 2.3 SOCIAL SECURITY/SAVE
7 2.3 NATIONAL DEBT
5 1.7 GOV&#039;T OVER-SPENDING
5 1.7 CARE USA FIRST
4 1.3 WAGES/HIGHER




PLEASE TELL ME WHETHER YOU HAVE A FAVORABLE OR UNFAVORABLE OPINION OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING. IF YOU HAVE NO OPINION OR HAVE NEVER HEARD OF THE PERSON, JUST SAY SO.


&quot;BILL OWENS&quot;
&lt;strong&gt;72 24.0 FAVORABLE&lt;/strong&gt;
50 16.7 UNFAVORABLE
149 49.7 NO OPINION
29 9.7 NEVER HEARD OF


PLEASE TELL ME WHETHER YOU HAVE A FAVORABLE OR UNFAVORABLE OPINION OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING. IF YOU HAVE NO OPINION OR HAVE NEVER HEARD OF THE PERSON, JUST SAY SO.



&quot;DEDE SCOZZAFAVA&quot;
72 24.0 FAVORABLE
&lt;strong&gt;85 28.3 UNFAVORABLE&lt;/strong&gt;
125 41.7 NO OPINION
18 6.0 NEVER HEARD OF



PLEASE TELL ME WHETHER YOU HAVE A FAVORABLE OR UNFAVORABLE OPINION OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING. IF YOU HAVE NO OPINION OR HAVE NEVER HEARD OF THE PERSON, JUST SAY SO.



&quot;DOUG HOFFMAN&quot;
&lt;strong&gt;91 30.3 FAVORABLE&lt;/strong&gt;
41 13.7 UNFAVORABLE
&lt;strong&gt;143 47.7 NO OPINION&lt;/strong&gt;
25 8.3 NEVER HEARD OF




IF THE SPECIAL ELECTION FOR U.S. CONGRESS WAS HELD TODAY, AND THE CANDIDATES WERE BILL OWENS, THE DEMOCRAT, DEDE SCOZZAFAVA, THE REPUBLICAN, AND DOUG HOFFMAN, THE PARTY CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE, FOR WHOM WOULD YOU VOTE?



&lt;strong&gt;81 27.0 COMBO OWENS&lt;/strong&gt;
71 23.7 Vote Owens
10 3.3 Lean Owens
&lt;strong&gt;59 19.7 COMBO SCOZZAFAVA&lt;/strong&gt;
54 18.0 Vote Scozzafava
5 1.7 Lean Scozzafava
&lt;strong&gt;94 31.3 COMBO HOFFMAN&lt;/strong&gt;
85 28.3 Vote Hoffman
9 3.0 Lean Hoffman
66 22.0 FIRM UNDECIDED



BETWEEN BILL OWENS, THE DEMOCRAT, DEDE SCOZZAFAVA, THE REPUBLICAN, AND DOUG HOFFMAN, THE CONSERVATIVE, WHO WOULD BE YOUR SECOND CHOICE CANDIDATE?



31 10.3 OWENS
&lt;strong&gt;41 13.7 SCOZZAFAVA&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;39 13.0 HOFFMAN&lt;/strong&gt;
189 63.0 UNDECIDED



BETWEEN BILL OWENS, DEDE SCOZZAFAVA, AND DOUG HOFFMAN, WHO WOULD YOU SAY WOULD DO THE BEST JOB IN THE FOLLOWING AREA?
&quot;CREATING JOBS&quot;


&lt;strong&gt;
80 26.7 OWENS&lt;/strong&gt;
42 14.0 SCOZZAFAVA
&lt;strong&gt;71 23.7 HOFFMAN&lt;/strong&gt;
17 5.7 NONE
4 1.3 ALL
86 28.7 DK/REFUSED



BETWEEN BILL OWENS, DEDE SCOZZAFAVA, AND DOUG HOFFMAN, WHO WOULD YOU SAY WOULD DO THE BEST JOB IN THE FOLLOWING AREA?
&quot;REDUCING WASHINGTON SPENDING&quot;



53 17.7 OWENS
40 13.3 SCOZZAFAVA
&lt;strong&gt;91 30.3 HOFFMAN&lt;/strong&gt;
25 8.3 NONE
9 3.0 ALL
82 27.3 DK/REFUSED



WHAT IS YOUR AGE?
10 3.3 18 - 25
31 10.3 26 - 40
60 20.0 41 - 54
91 30.3 55 - 64
104 34.7 65 OR OLDER
4 1.3 REFUSED



GENDER:
141 47.0 MALE
159 53.0 FEMALE



AREA:
73 24.3 BURLINGTON M.M.
39 13.0 Clinton County
14 4.7 Essex County
20 6.7 Franklin County
16 5.3 ALBANY M.M.
12 4.0 Fulton County
4 1.3 Hamilton County
107 35.7 WATERTOWN M.M.
46 15.3 Jefferson County
13 4.3 Lewis County
48 16.0 St Lawrence County
104 34.7 SYRACUSE M.M.
34 11.3 Madison County
12 4.0 Oneida County
58 19.3 Oswego County

http://www.clubforgrowth.org/media/uploads/NY-23-top-lines.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Internals from the CFG poll:</p>
<p>AS YOU MIGHT KNOW, ON NOVEMBER 3RD THERE WILL BE LOCAL ELECTIONS AND A SPECIAL ELECTION FOR CONGRESS IN YOUR AREA TO FILL THE SEAT BEING VACATED BY CONGRESSMAN JOHN MCHUGH. USUALLY, VERY FEW PEOPLE VOTE IN SPECIAL ELECTIONS LIKE THESE. </p>
<p>HOW LIKELY ARE YOU TO VOTE IN THE<br />
UPCOMING LOCAL ELECTIONS AND THE SPECIAL ELECTION FOR CONGRESS? WOULD YOU SAY YOU ARE VERY LIKELY TO VOTE, SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO VOTE, OR NOT LIKELY TO VOTE? IF YOU ARE NOT REGISTERED TO VOTE IN NEW YORK, JUST SAY SO.</p>
<p>300 100.0 VERY LIKELY</p>
<p>IF YOU HAD TO LABEL YOURSELF, WOULD YOU SAY YOU ARE A LIBERAL, A MODERATE, OR A CONSERVATIVE IN YOUR POLITICAL BELIEFS?</p>
<p>55 18.3 LIBERAL<br />
92 30.7 MODERATE<br />
<strong>123 41.0 CONSERAVTIVE</strong><br />
61 20.3 Smwht Conservative<br />
62 20.7 Very Conservative<br />
30 10.0 DK/REFUSED</p>
<p>WITH WHICH POLITICAL PARTY ARE YOU REGISTERED?</p>
<p>108 36.0 DEMOCRAT<br />
145 48.3 REPUBLICAN<br />
40 13.3 INDEPENDENT/NO PARTY<br />
2 0.7 CONSERVATIVE<br />
1 0.3 OTHER<br />
4 1.3 REFUSED</p>
<p>WHAT IS THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE FACING THE UNITED STATES TODAY THAT YOU WOULD MOST LIKE TO SEE YOUR MEMBER OF CONGRESS MAKE HIS OR HER TOP PRIORITY?</p>
<p>72 24.0 HEALTH CARE/REFORM<br />
67 22.3 ECONOMY<br />
32 10.7 UNEMPLOYMENT/JOBS<br />
26 8.7 WAR/IRAQ/AFGHAN<br />
13 4.3 REDUCE TAXES<br />
9 3.0 HEALTH INS./AFFORD<br />
7 2.3 SOCIAL SECURITY/SAVE<br />
7 2.3 NATIONAL DEBT<br />
5 1.7 GOV&#8217;T OVER-SPENDING<br />
5 1.7 CARE USA FIRST<br />
4 1.3 WAGES/HIGHER</p>
<p>PLEASE TELL ME WHETHER YOU HAVE A FAVORABLE OR UNFAVORABLE OPINION OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING. IF YOU HAVE NO OPINION OR HAVE NEVER HEARD OF THE PERSON, JUST SAY SO.</p>
<p>&#8220;BILL OWENS&#8221;<br />
<strong>72 24.0 FAVORABLE</strong><br />
50 16.7 UNFAVORABLE<br />
149 49.7 NO OPINION<br />
29 9.7 NEVER HEARD OF</p>
<p>PLEASE TELL ME WHETHER YOU HAVE A FAVORABLE OR UNFAVORABLE OPINION OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING. IF YOU HAVE NO OPINION OR HAVE NEVER HEARD OF THE PERSON, JUST SAY SO.</p>
<p>&#8220;DEDE SCOZZAFAVA&#8221;<br />
72 24.0 FAVORABLE<br />
<strong>85 28.3 UNFAVORABLE</strong><br />
125 41.7 NO OPINION<br />
18 6.0 NEVER HEARD OF</p>
<p>PLEASE TELL ME WHETHER YOU HAVE A FAVORABLE OR UNFAVORABLE OPINION OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING. IF YOU HAVE NO OPINION OR HAVE NEVER HEARD OF THE PERSON, JUST SAY SO.</p>
<p>&#8220;DOUG HOFFMAN&#8221;<br />
<strong>91 30.3 FAVORABLE</strong><br />
41 13.7 UNFAVORABLE<br />
<strong>143 47.7 NO OPINION</strong><br />
25 8.3 NEVER HEARD OF</p>
<p>IF THE SPECIAL ELECTION FOR U.S. CONGRESS WAS HELD TODAY, AND THE CANDIDATES WERE BILL OWENS, THE DEMOCRAT, DEDE SCOZZAFAVA, THE REPUBLICAN, AND DOUG HOFFMAN, THE PARTY CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE, FOR WHOM WOULD YOU VOTE?</p>
<p><strong>81 27.0 COMBO OWENS</strong><br />
71 23.7 Vote Owens<br />
10 3.3 Lean Owens<br />
<strong>59 19.7 COMBO SCOZZAFAVA</strong><br />
54 18.0 Vote Scozzafava<br />
5 1.7 Lean Scozzafava<br />
<strong>94 31.3 COMBO HOFFMAN</strong><br />
85 28.3 Vote Hoffman<br />
9 3.0 Lean Hoffman<br />
66 22.0 FIRM UNDECIDED</p>
<p>BETWEEN BILL OWENS, THE DEMOCRAT, DEDE SCOZZAFAVA, THE REPUBLICAN, AND DOUG HOFFMAN, THE CONSERVATIVE, WHO WOULD BE YOUR SECOND CHOICE CANDIDATE?</p>
<p>31 10.3 OWENS<br />
<strong>41 13.7 SCOZZAFAVA</strong><br />
<strong>39 13.0 HOFFMAN</strong><br />
189 63.0 UNDECIDED</p>
<p>BETWEEN BILL OWENS, DEDE SCOZZAFAVA, AND DOUG HOFFMAN, WHO WOULD YOU SAY WOULD DO THE BEST JOB IN THE FOLLOWING AREA?<br />
&#8220;CREATING JOBS&#8221;</p>
<p><strong><br />
80 26.7 OWENS</strong><br />
42 14.0 SCOZZAFAVA<br />
<strong>71 23.7 HOFFMAN</strong><br />
17 5.7 NONE<br />
4 1.3 ALL<br />
86 28.7 DK/REFUSED</p>
<p>BETWEEN BILL OWENS, DEDE SCOZZAFAVA, AND DOUG HOFFMAN, WHO WOULD YOU SAY WOULD DO THE BEST JOB IN THE FOLLOWING AREA?<br />
&#8220;REDUCING WASHINGTON SPENDING&#8221;</p>
<p>53 17.7 OWENS<br />
40 13.3 SCOZZAFAVA<br />
<strong>91 30.3 HOFFMAN</strong><br />
25 8.3 NONE<br />
9 3.0 ALL<br />
82 27.3 DK/REFUSED</p>
<p>WHAT IS YOUR AGE?<br />
10 3.3 18 &#8211; 25<br />
31 10.3 26 &#8211; 40<br />
60 20.0 41 &#8211; 54<br />
91 30.3 55 &#8211; 64<br />
104 34.7 65 OR OLDER<br />
4 1.3 REFUSED</p>
<p>GENDER:<br />
141 47.0 MALE<br />
159 53.0 FEMALE</p>
<p>AREA:<br />
73 24.3 BURLINGTON M.M.<br />
39 13.0 Clinton County<br />
14 4.7 Essex County<br />
20 6.7 Franklin County<br />
16 5.3 ALBANY M.M.<br />
12 4.0 Fulton County<br />
4 1.3 Hamilton County<br />
107 35.7 WATERTOWN M.M.<br />
46 15.3 Jefferson County<br />
13 4.3 Lewis County<br />
48 16.0 St Lawrence County<br />
104 34.7 SYRACUSE M.M.<br />
34 11.3 Madison County<br />
12 4.0 Oneida County<br />
58 19.3 Oswego County</p>
<p><a href="http://www.clubforgrowth.org/media/uploads/NY-23-top-lines.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.clubforgrowth.org/media/uploads/NY-23-top-lines.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveegg</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-2/#comment-2872889</link>
		<dc:creator>steveegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2872889</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I am certain Doug will win, but will he then run in 2010 as a Republican? Where can one get more information on the Conservative Party?

metroryder on October 26, 2009 at 4:37 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
That&#039;s more likely than Scozzafava running as a Republican in 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I am certain Doug will win, but will he then run in 2010 as a Republican? Where can one get more information on the Conservative Party?</p>
<p>metroryder on October 26, 2009 at 4:37 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s more likely than Scozzafava running as a Republican in 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Runny Eggs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Club for Growth says Hoffman leads in NY-23, NRCC hardest hit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-2/#comment-2872857</link>
		<dc:creator>No Runny Eggs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Club for Growth says Hoffman leads in NY-23, NRCC hardest hit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2872857</guid>
		<description>[...] (H/T &#8211; Ed Morrissey) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (H/T &#8211; Ed Morrissey) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metroryder</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-2/#comment-2872750</link>
		<dc:creator>metroryder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2872750</guid>
		<description>I am from the Indianapolis area and can only hope a candidate such as Doug Hoffman will come our way.

I am certain Doug will win, but will he then run in 2010 as a Republican?  Where can one get more information on the Conservative Party?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am from the Indianapolis area and can only hope a candidate such as Doug Hoffman will come our way.</p>
<p>I am certain Doug will win, but will he then run in 2010 as a Republican?  Where can one get more information on the Conservative Party?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. ZhivBlago</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-2/#comment-2872624</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. ZhivBlago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2872624</guid>
		<description>Hopefully, it&#039;s not just the Demlibcommietards quaking, but also the RINOs.

Sweep &#039;em out...everywhere.  Back to &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; (non-progressive pinko) Democrats and (Democrat-lite) Republicans before it&#039;s too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully, it&#8217;s not just the Demlibcommietards quaking, but also the RINOs.</p>
<p>Sweep &#8216;em out&#8230;everywhere.  Back to <em>real</em> (non-progressive pinko) Democrats and (Democrat-lite) Republicans before it&#8217;s too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TXUS</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-2/#comment-2872584</link>
		<dc:creator>TXUS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2872584</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;gary4205 on October 26, 2009 at 3:48 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well said!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>gary4205 on October 26, 2009 at 3:48 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Well said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vntnrse</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/26/too-good-to-check-hoffman-leading-in-ny-23/comment-page-2/#comment-2872553</link>
		<dc:creator>Vntnrse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=70305#comment-2872553</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Hannity, Hoffman will be on his radio show this afternoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Hannity, Hoffman will be on his radio show this afternoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
