Gallup: 61% of Americans think Obama Nobel undeserved
posted at 9:50 am on October 24, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
After Barack Obama’s defenders accused critics of his Nobel Peace Prize of being un-American for criticizing the award, Gallup polled over 1500 adults to determine the public response to it. Surprisingly, Gallup found that 61% of Americans hate America — at least according to Obama’s defenders:
The majority of Americans do not believe President Barack Obama deserved to win the Nobel Peace Prize (61%), but the public is split in its personal reaction to the announcement. Asked if they are “glad” Obama received the prize, 46% of Americans say yes and 47% say no. …
The USA Today/Gallup poll conducted about a week after the announcement did not ask Americans whether they believe that the award may ultimately be deserved, or whether it was appropriately given in anticipation of the potential of the Obama administration’s peace efforts. The central question simply asked whether Obama “deserved” the award, and found Americans by roughly a 2-to-1 margin saying no rather than yes.
Not surprisingly, reaction to the awarding of the prize is partisan, although support for Obama’s receiving the prize among Democrats is perhaps not as large as might be expected. Fifty-nine percent of Democrats say the award is deserved, which can be contrasted with the 84% of Democrats who in the same survey approve of Obama’s job performance. Independents and, in particular, Republicans are highly likely to say Obama did not deserve to win the prize.
It’s not fair to blame Barack Obama for the decision to award him the prize, of course. The White House didn’t campaign for it, and got so surprised by the news that initially some of them thought it was a joke. Some blame Obama for accepting the Nobel, but that’s unfair as well. It would have been needlessly insulting to reject the award, and would have accomplished nothing. While we believe that Obama has made a fetish of apologizing for America to get people to like us, we don’t want to gratuitously insult people, either.
However, the decision to award Obama the prize by the Nobel committee for his rhetoric was and is still laughable. It’s not un-American to point out that Obama has accomplished nothing to deserve it. Even the one action that the Nobel committee highlighted in its apologia of the decision, the reversal of the US missile-defense stance in eastern Europe, has been at least somewhat reversed since. We await the next Peace Prize, which might go to the winner of the Miss America contest, for her rhetorical support of “world peace,” using the same criteria established in Oslo.
Gallup’s respondents are about evenly split on whether Americans are happy or unhappy over the award. Most of those unhappy are annoyed at the very obvious attempt by the Nobel committee to interfere with American domestic politics. Perhaps a better question would have been whether we were amused by the award.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Through the looking glass.
OmahaConservative on October 24, 2009 at 9:54 AM
They love him. They really love him!
sheesh on October 24, 2009 at 9:54 AM
Only 61%?
mjbrooks3 on October 24, 2009 at 9:55 AM
I don’t have a problem with him getting because Bush was so evil. He doesn’t deserve it, but it’s more of a contrast issue.
Anti-Flag – Operation Iraqi Liberation
This is a tale of liberation,this dedication song
Broadcast it from all stations!!
This tribute, this salute
cold hard facts one can’t refute
#1 liberators in the world
can kill better than ice is cold!
To save you WE MAY HAVE TO KILL YOU!
For freedom YOU MAY HAVE TO DIE!
#1 at liberation
liberating life from bodies, helping spirits fly…
Freedom from… LIFE!
Spathi on October 24, 2009 at 9:57 AM
He won.
Bruce in NH on October 24, 2009 at 9:58 AM
I don’t know how you could keep as big an ego as our president has given his poll numbers and the criticism he gets. It’s mind boggling.
scalleywag on October 24, 2009 at 9:59 AM
This is one poll that Demoncrats will po po
MSGTAS on October 24, 2009 at 10:00 AM
I am not amused.
Shivas Irons on October 24, 2009 at 10:01 AM
She should be awarded beauty contest winner or something since she applied lipstick to try to improve her looks.
OmahaConservative on October 24, 2009 at 10:01 AM
Then that means that 39% of Americans are dumb as hell.
SoulGlo on October 24, 2009 at 10:01 AM
i’m more interested in the poll that says 61% say he doesn’t deserve a second term
stormin1961 on October 24, 2009 at 10:01 AM
They told me if I voted for McCain the world wouldn’t love us.
They were right. Those racist Frenchmen. Those right-wing Japanese.
Even when all he wants to do is modestly accept the Nobel Prize he earned, look at the ungrateful Europeans.
Drained Brain on October 24, 2009 at 10:01 AM
How do you know this? According to Weekly Standard, Rahm Emmanuel joked about something about Oslo when they lost face in Copenhagen. I bet the WH lobbied for this “award”
promachus on October 24, 2009 at 10:04 AM
There are still that many Dem’s clinging to failure?
“Democrats are an opinionated bunch . . . y’all are thinking for yourselves. . .Barack Hussein Obama.
David2.0 on October 24, 2009 at 10:05 AM
I disagree. He would have looked much, much better in graciously acknowledging he hadn’t done anything to merit a Nobel prize. In fact, I can think of a bunch of other winners over the past several years who would have been better off declining as well.
ddrintn on October 24, 2009 at 10:05 AM
I don’t have a problem with him getting it, or with him accepting it either. Keep the money Obama, it’s yours. I just think it laughable, Obama has done nothing but talk, and the nobel comittee is obviously trying to influence our foreign policy. But so what? EVERYONE tries to influence our foreign policy-it’s when America’s foreign policy ceases to matter that we’ll have a real problem.
Mord on October 24, 2009 at 10:07 AM
I’d like to see the same poll, but among registered voters, not just adults, in a properly weighted sample of Rs, Is, and Ds.
The number thinking the prize undeserved would probably be in the 80s.
TXUS on October 24, 2009 at 10:08 AM
Obama getting the Nobel Peace Prize is really aggravating the Neocons.
For that reason alone, it’s pretty awesome.
Spathi on October 24, 2009 at 10:08 AM
The bright side of this is that all who so enthusiastically throw out these accolades to a man who has done essentially nothing are going to look foolish when the house of cards collapses–and it will.
zoyclem on October 24, 2009 at 10:09 AM
This man is as phony as a $3 bill.
rplat on October 24, 2009 at 10:09 AM
I really hope some Islamicist cuts off your cl%t.
PimFortuynsGhost on October 24, 2009 at 10:10 AM
I don’t see what all the fuss is about. The Nobel Peace Prize has had no real significance for quite some time.
Either that, or I have no understanding of the word “peace”.
OldEnglish on October 24, 2009 at 10:11 AM
No it isn’t. The “Neocons” (about which you know nothing) don’t really care.
ddrintn on October 24, 2009 at 10:12 AM
Black Hawk Down 16 years ago this Month.
People remember there was a GREEN President in the White House back in 1993, with no Military Background either.
We are presently in two theaters Iraq and Afghanistan. What could go wrong with the current President ignoring precedent.
While the White House goes to War with a News Network. We have Americans in Harms way, waiting for him to make a decision on Troop deployment build up in Afghanistan.
Lest we forget, we have people fighting for us on the front lines of Afghanistan. It was later determined that Al Qaeda and Bin Laden, trained and funded the people who shot the Black Hawks Down, 3 Oct 1993 Mogadishu.
What is the President waiting for? An International Incident to give him political cover..al la Joe Biden. Gird Your Loins?
Dr Evil on October 24, 2009 at 10:14 AM
I am so glad that the Dingbat Messiah received the Nobel Peace Prize. It is as if they gave Him a scepter that is a toilet plunger.
Really Right on October 24, 2009 at 10:14 AM
You ever wonder why this 39% always reaccur in polling results? These are the welfare slugs of society that suck the life blood out of our countries wealth. These people contribute nothing to society and are only looking for their next handout from big gubnut.
trs on October 24, 2009 at 10:15 AM
accur = occur
Fingers obey!
trs on October 24, 2009 at 10:15 AM
Perhaps if your sister were kidnapped and taken to one of Saddam’s “rape rooms” you’d have a better appreciation of the sacrifice and bravery of our troops.
It shouldn’t take such an extreme example, but, you are who are.
David2.0 on October 24, 2009 at 10:15 AM
Totally undeserved…
Khun Joe on October 24, 2009 at 10:15 AM
I think Krauthammer was upset about it as were some of people on the National Review.
I bet John Bolton didn’t like it either.
Spathi on October 24, 2009 at 10:16 AM
Ed; you’re on a roll today. I’m trying to deal with one problem of multiple regression analysis and you’re knocking them out of the park. What are you drinking today?
ted c on October 24, 2009 at 10:17 AM
and the 39%? what are they drinking?
kooooooooooooooooooolaid.
reliapundit on October 24, 2009 at 10:18 AM
I should get a bonus today for showing up to work.
OmahaConservative on October 24, 2009 at 10:21 AM
Well, no sh*t.
It doesn’t make me angry, didn’t at the time and doesn’t now. I think it’s probably the funniest thing I’ve ever heard in a while, though. It cheapens the prize (although giving it to Algore had already pretty much sewn that up), but that’s not my problem, it’s the Nobel committee’s. And it adds to Obama’s aura of self-absorption – but the MSM does that every day of the week, so what’s a little bit more?
Go on, enjoy your prize, Mr. Obama. It means a lot to you – not to anyone else, of course, but to you. And, after all, it is all about you, right?
uncivilized on October 24, 2009 at 10:21 AM
only 61%…that is pretty sad
tomas on October 24, 2009 at 10:23 AM
Agreed. Obama has no record of achievement. Instead, everything has been handed to him. Why should a Nobel be different? Any story demonstrating humility on his part is automatically suspect. He just doesn’t have it in him.
flyfisher on October 24, 2009 at 10:24 AM
Wait ’till he panders to the Nobel Committee with his acceptance speech. Bet the number bumps to the 70 percent range if Gallup re-asks the question.
jon1979 on October 24, 2009 at 10:26 AM
I’m happy that he won the Nobel, thereby illustrating what a pile of crap the peace prize is.
Little Boomer on October 24, 2009 at 10:26 AM
I would like to know who nominated him for the award!
Tom
marinetbryant on October 24, 2009 at 10:26 AM
100% of people think Obama is a communist.
14% of “liberals” and 86% of the rest of the people.
darwin on October 24, 2009 at 10:27 AM
Barry should be the star of “Titanic II: the Obama Administration”
“I’m the King of the World!!!”
Yeah, right, Barry.
Really Right on October 24, 2009 at 10:32 AM
This poll clearly shows that 39 percent of Americans are dumber than a bag of hair.
rollthedice on October 24, 2009 at 10:33 AM
As I said in the headlines thread, what matters is not so much that 61% are un-American, but that 34% are clueless partisan knaves.
OneGyT on October 24, 2009 at 10:34 AM
He may not have campaigned for it, but his lackeys nominated him for it. Do we know yet who it was?
It would have been insulting not to accept it, to the Nobel Committee, NOT the American people. Had Obama NOT accepted the award, he would have given himself a shot in the arm – at least he would have shown a bit of temperance towards his ego.
catmman on October 24, 2009 at 10:36 AM
So 61% of us are racist, un-American h8ters…
I hope they’ll all show up at the ballot box in 2012…
RocketmanBob on October 24, 2009 at 10:36 AM
Or uneducated knaves. Teach your children well.
publiuspen on October 24, 2009 at 10:39 AM
That’s not true Ed, Obama has almost destroyed the evil United States.
larvcom on October 24, 2009 at 10:41 AM
I just put a load of laundry in the dryer. Can I get a Nobel prize, too? At least I did something.
kingsjester on October 24, 2009 at 10:46 AM
Are you for socialism, communism of both?
Johan Klaus on October 24, 2009 at 10:48 AM
We still do not know who nomminated him. It would explain how they were not fully ready when they took over.
cobrakai99 on October 24, 2009 at 10:53 AM
Does anyone disagree that if he declined to accept it, his poll numbers would be higher? His hubris will just bring him lower.
royzer on October 24, 2009 at 10:55 AM
I don’t care that he won, it’s a stupid prize anyway. I sure don’t think he did anything to deserve it, but Al Gore got one and all he did was make a movie. People who risk their lives to rescue people apparently are not worthy of the prize.
Piedad Cordoba has served as an opposition senator for several years but more importantly has acted as a broker for the liberation of hostages held by Colombia’s FARC rebels. Her work as liaison has also helped distribute videos of hostages still held captive deep in the jungle and has brought hope to dozens of families anxiously awaiting their loved ones.
scalleywag on October 24, 2009 at 10:57 AM
royzer on October 24, 2009 at 10:55 AM
Barry is too stupid to know that he ought to throttle back a little.
Really Right on October 24, 2009 at 10:58 AM
I’m gonna go with puzzlement, followed by humor, and then apathy toward the Nobel Committee. No anger, though.
HAnthonyWayne on October 24, 2009 at 10:58 AM
Didn’t campaign for it? What were all those blame America speeches throughout Europe and Cairo? How about the 4th Reich rally in Germany on the campaign trail? He spent a lot of time during the Prez campaign courting Europe and spreading hate for America. Precisely what the Nobel Peace Prize committee loves.
chicagojedi on October 24, 2009 at 10:59 AM
39% of Americans are pretty dumb.
jhffmn on October 24, 2009 at 11:00 AM
Spathi,
Do you have anything to say about O receiving the NPP or is this just another excuse to bash the Je… I mean Neocons.
Howcome on October 24, 2009 at 11:05 AM
There are those of us out here that believe Obama was elected because of media malfeasance. If the press had done their jobs, we wouldn’t have a President trying to control them like this one is.
This prize only serves to fortify that belief and make it appear entirely plausible. The problem is it only does that for people without blinders on. The Democrats actually believe Obama is the best president we ever had and he deserves this prize. Of course they also believe you can add 45 million people to the health care system and it won’t add to the budget deficit. Go figure!!!
bflat879 on October 24, 2009 at 11:06 AM
I am waiting to see if they give him a second Nobel Peace Prize at the end of his term in office.
albill on October 24, 2009 at 11:09 AM
Since this is the new way of determining the winner of prizes, we should have given Tim Tebow the Heisman in the preseason. We need to pray for those 39%, they are the new lost.
Go Gators!
Kissmygrits on October 24, 2009 at 11:09 AM
You are forgetting a key attribute of the Left. THEY are allowed to think it is undeserved, but the Right must think it is deserved or they are racist!!!
Speedwagon82 on October 24, 2009 at 11:15 AM
I do not understand. Nobel gives prizes to a people who do things that are detremental to the continuance of Western Civilization’s domination in the world. So why is it that Obama does not derseve this? I think he is a perfit fit.
MikeA on October 24, 2009 at 11:18 AM
So 61% of us are racist, un-American h8ters…
I hope they’ll all show up at the ballot box in 2012…
RocketmanBob on October 24, 2009
Give us a conservative candidate and we’ll be there with bells on. Give us McCain version 2.0 and get the same result as last time.
SKYFOX on October 24, 2009 at 11:21 AM
ESPN refused to show the Heisman votes for Obama in its Nissan promotion.
More reason to dither on Afghanistan.
Christien on October 24, 2009 at 11:26 AM
Tried to throw Fox out of the press pool?
That’s a Peace Prize!
Christien on October 24, 2009 at 11:28 AM
I totally disagree. It would have been a good thing. Insulting people for awarding you a prize for something you MIGHT do? They should be insulted. It was actually insulting to give that To Obama. I would be insulted if they awarded it to me, and I wouldn’t think twice about returning it. I know, I’m just me, but I’ve done about as much as Mr. Obama has done to justify a Nobel Peace Prize.
With that said, I can’t believe 40% would think the man deserves that prize. There are a lot of people walking around in la la land out there. yikes.
bridgetown on October 24, 2009 at 11:31 AM
OK, kid. Please give us credible, multi-sourced cites proving Bush is “evil”.
Del Dolemonte on October 24, 2009 at 11:32 AM
OmahaConservative on October 24, 2009 at 11:40 AM
Del Dolemonte on October 24, 2009 at 11:32 AM
I can’t wait to see these sources. Oh, boy.
kingsjester on October 24, 2009 at 11:42 AM
If President Obama had even an ounce of character or integrity he would have refused this award, but of course he would never do something like that.
JeffinSac on October 24, 2009 at 11:48 AM
That’s what I was wondering. I read somewhere that the invitation for nominations began back in September ’08. Wouldn’t you just automatically think that some of his buds in Chicago (or his best bud Soros) had something to do with this?
imfedup on October 24, 2009 at 11:49 AM
The White House didn’t pull The Precedent’s name from nomination, either.
Wow! That’s some logic, there, Ed. The award was such a joke that the White House staff initially thought it was a joke – and said so – but being that much of a total joke is no reason to reject the award? Are you serious?
It would have shown integrity to reject an unearned award. Yes, that seems to be a foreign notion, these days. Affirmative action thinking has invaded too many parts of our society for the concept of “earning something” to resonate with many. It would have accomplished the task of showing The Precedent to have some integrity … but seeing that he has none, anyway, and then that many others no longer seem to understand what integrity is, I guess you’re right that a display of integrity would have been useless and purposeless.
Er .. no, Ed. He doesn’t apologize for America to get others to like us. He apologizes for America because he hates AMerica and he hates us. He doesn’t want people to like us. He wants people to hate us, but to like him – though denigrating and demeaning the US is his main goal. And The Precedent even has to lie about everything he is “apologizing” for, because his twisted, un-American, anti-American view of the world does not reflect reality at all.
Huh? “Grauitously” insult the scumbags over at Nobel who have made a living of sh!tting all over the US at every opportunity? Ed, I don’t know what’s been happening to you, but this is all nuts. Pure nuts.
progressoverpeace on October 24, 2009 at 11:49 AM
Confirmed
BierManVA on October 24, 2009 at 11:50 AM
When the news broke about Obama being awarded the prize, I read a news article online (don’t recall which paper it was) that said that the Nobel committee rules require all nominees to be informed of their nomination. According to this article, all nominees who want to keep their names in the running have to agree in advance to accept the prize if they win, so that the Nobel committee won’t be embarrassed by some winner refusing the prize. If that article was correct, that casts Obama’s acceptance in a whole new light — although one can still easily understand why the White House would think his winning was a joke.
AZCoyote on October 24, 2009 at 11:51 AM
George Catlett Marshall (December 31, 1880-October 16, 1959), America’s foremost soldier during World War II, served as chief of staff from 1939 to 1945, building and directing the largest army in history. A diplomat, he acted as secretary of state from 1947 to 1949, formulating the «Marshall Plan», an unprecedented program of economic and military aid to foreign nations.
Marshall’s father owned a prosperous coal business in Pennsylvania, but the boy, deciding to become a soldier, enrolled at the Virginia Military Institute from which he was graduated in 1901 as senior first captain of the Corps of Cadets. After serving in posts in the Philippines and the United States, Marshall was graduated with honors from the Infantry-Cavalry School at Fort Leavenworth in 1907 and from the Army Staff College in 1908. The young officer distinguished himself in a variety of posts in the next nine years, earning an appointment to the General Staff in World War I and sailing to France with the First Division. He achieved fame and promotion for his staff work in the battles of Cantigny, Aisne-Marne, St. Mihiel, and Meuse-Argonne. After acting as aide-de-camp to General Pershing from 1919 to 1924, Marshall served in China from 1924 to 1927, and then successively as instructor in the Army War College in 1927, as assistant commandant of the Infantry School from 1927 to 1932, as commander of the Eighth Infantry in 1933, as senior instructor to the Illinois National Guard from 1933 to 1936, and as commander, with the rank of brigadier general, of the Fifth Infantry Brigade from 1936 to 1938. In July, 1938, Marshall accepted a post with the General Staff in Washington, D. C., and in September, 1939, was named chief of staff, with the rank of general, by President Roosevelt. He became general of the army in 1944, the year in which Congress created that five-star rank.
In his position as chief of staff, Marshall urged military readiness prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, later became responsible for the building, supplying, and, in part, the deploying of over eight million soldiers. From 1941 he was a member of the policy committee that supervised the atomic studies engaged in by American and British scientists. The war over, Marshall resigned in November, 1945.
But Marshall could not resign from public service; his military career ended, he took up a diplomatic career. He had been associated with diplomatic events while chief of staff, for he participated in the conference on the Atlantic Charter (1941-1942), and in those at Casablanca (1943), Quebec (1943), Cairo-Teheran (1943), Yalta (1945), Potsdam (1945), and in many others of lesser import. In late 1945 and in 1946, he represented President Truman on a special mission to China, then torn by civil war; in January, 1947, he accepted the Cabinet position of secretary of state, holding it for two years. In the spring of 1947 he outlined in a speech at Harvard University the plan of economic aid which history has named the «Marshall Plan».
For one year during the Korean War General Marshall was secretary of defence, a civilian post in the U. S. Cabinet. Having resigned from this post in September, 1951, three months before his seventy-first birthday, he retired from public service, thereafter performing those ceremonial duties the public comes to expect of its famous men.
George C Marshall was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1953.
ted c on October 24, 2009 at 11:53 AM
Who the hell are the other 39%? He. Has. Not. Accomplished. Anything.
metric on October 24, 2009 at 11:58 AM
Well, at least the President agrees with me on one and only one thing: the Nobel Peace Prize is a joke. His winning it was a joke.
Diminshed Peace Prize, diminished President.
BetseyRoss on October 24, 2009 at 12:07 PM
Alternate headline: 2/3 of Americans agree with Obama
crr6 on October 24, 2009 at 12:08 PM
The Citizens are fighting the unions instead. Two of our Tea Party group leaders have joined three others to submit paperwork to the SEIU-poaster filled Attorney General’s office for the first Tea Party Proposition in the state.
The essence of the proposal is that employees will not longer be forced to give money to unions, that can later be used for political purposes. Details are —
Freeing State Employees from Union-Political Elite’s Deal: CA’s 1st TEA PARTY INITIATIVE
Mutnodjmet on October 24, 2009 at 12:11 PM
Well hes alienated most of our allies,and quadrupled the deficit in 10 months.His new stragery in Afghanistan has turned a near victory into a near defeat.He goes after private citizens and a cable news channel for daring to criticize him.His speeches contain petty attacks on political foes.He contradicts himself constantly(well,lies,really)He turned his back on pro-democracy Iranians.He bowed to a muslim king.Hes given/giving millions to hamas..and now this /muslim technology/ bullshit thingy.He thinks Global Warming by humans is real,and is set to wreck our economy over it.Hes cool with violent /black panthers/ setting up shop outside polling station,etc etc etc whats not to love? /
theTarCzar on October 24, 2009 at 12:18 PM
Patriotic Conservatives by the Southern Avenger.
The Right is still decompressing from the Bush years in which White House Speech Write David Frum wrote the article “Unpatrioc Conservatives” damning conservatives who opposed Bush and his wars.
Now it’s time to turn our back on the Bushies.
Spathi on October 24, 2009 at 12:18 PM
He hasn’t done anything to deserve it and he came out and said so. Good move for him. However, the diddling and fiddling over Afghanistan was a calculated and political move by the liberal Nobel committee and it is working. Obama is a puppet of the left. And for that, he earns disdain.
Key West Reader on October 24, 2009 at 12:19 PM
I figured they were going to give him one but wait until 2012. Basically that in effect give him a free political advert in October of 2012 when all the network news covered it. (Plus hacks could say that we should give him a second term because of how bad it would look when he went to Oslo if the American public had told him to take a hike.)
Dave_d on October 24, 2009 at 12:23 PM
I think he’ll step down before 2012 to become King of the UN. I think the UN is a better place for chicago jesus.
Key West Reader on October 24, 2009 at 12:32 PM
First, use terms you the meaning of. Not knowing what YOU think a “neocon” is I cannot really respond. But for those that think Barry is an amateur I think nonplussed about him receiving the Noble Peace Prize is more accurate. Him being awarded the prize boggles the mind.
Fed45 on October 24, 2009 at 12:39 PM
Are you speaking to your fellow sufferers of Bush Deranged Syndrome? Most mature, mentally healthy adults moved on from Bush on Jan 20th.
Fed45 on October 24, 2009 at 12:41 PM
It’s funny to see all the kool aid drinkers trying to support this award. At least they’re consistent–meaning, Obama didn’t do anything to become president, nor did he do anything to warrant this award. Either way, they’re defending an empty closet. Keep it up koolaid.
Overall, it’s not his fault he won the award, it’s funny to see how his drinkers will support anything stupid surrounding him, even when it’s as meaningless and empty as this nobel.
ted c on October 24, 2009 at 12:51 PM
You mean Secretary General of the UN? I thought the French pitch a fit if the guy doesn’t speak French. Oh wait, he could promise to really try to learn it like the current one. (Yeah and then they can hope he will.)
Dave_d on October 24, 2009 at 12:52 PM
Translation: “Del challenged me to prove Bush is evil, and I couldn’t, so I will change the subject.”
Del Dolemonte on October 24, 2009 at 1:15 PM
Come on. If he agreed with 2/3 of Americans he would have been too embarrassed to accept the thing. Instead we get the usual “I am both highly honored and deeply humbled to be speaking before you, the Association of Progressive Left-handed Former Taoist Nuns…”
ddrintn on October 24, 2009 at 1:16 PM
***
A Black woman in one of the African countries–Uganda?–worked many years to improve her–and other–countries health. She talked to major drug companies and got them the allow setting up a factory to make cheap anti-AIDS drugs for the area. She helped set up better health education in the area. She probably saved hundreds of thousands of people from the curse of AIDS.
***
President George Bush 43 increased U.S. health aid money to this area–by 400 percent over previous presidents. Many more people were probably saved from AIDS.
***
Both President Bushes–41 and 43–freed millions of Muslims from the genocidal murderer Saddam Hussein–and paid him back with a long drop with a short rope for his crimes.
***
These people–with measurable accomplishments–were not selected by the socialist Norwegian Nobel “Peace” Prize committee. They selected a socialist / marxist / communist “fellow traveler” when they picked Comrade Obama for this “honor”.
***
The Nobel Prize committee “jumped the shark” for me when the gave this award to the evil murderer Yassir Arafat. Fortunately French medical work gave the world a much bigger prize when they helped that bozo “check out”.
***
John Bibb
***
rocketman on October 24, 2009 at 1:20 PM
“The White House didn’t campaign for it” o yes he did!!! Why else screw Poland and Czechs on missile shield? The deal was already signed. Did you know that? I said it than, and i say it again (I knew he was in line for it, it was all over internet) he did it for Nobel Prize. Why else talking about disarmament when nobody else wanted that? Chinese and Russians were caught off guard. Why else play nice with idiots from Venezuela and Cuba? Why did he openly refuse to talk about Iran’s riots? He always knew that he is in the running for a Prize. One more thing. The only reason he did not get Nobel in economy, was because we were loudly laughing at Peace Prize.
ktrelski on October 24, 2009 at 1:28 PM
Crr seriously you are a joke. NO matter what you got Obama’s rear. He could kill someone on tv in cold blood and you would find an excuse.
Are those 60% or so unpatriotic btw?
CWforFreedom on October 24, 2009 at 1:38 PM
Here’s someone who could beat this empty head.
Schadenfreude on October 24, 2009 at 1:48 PM
39% of those polled were morons .
borntoraisehogs on October 24, 2009 at 2:08 PM
Hardly. On the contrary, no matter what you’ll criticize him. As a result you have zero credibility when you do.
What exactly did Obama do wrong here? He was given an award which he didn’t lobby for at all. He himself said he didn’t deserve it. Criticize the Nobel Foundation if you want, but what’s your problem with Obama here?
crr6 on October 24, 2009 at 2:47 PM
He didn’t have his name removed from consideration, which any normal person would have done upon being informed that he had been nominated. That was mistake 1.
The only truth that has ever come out of his mouth.
They are America-hating morons who felt the need to give the greatest affirmative action honorific ever. They are scum who should never be taken seriously by anyone and all of whose members should be shunned. They are despicable fools who are working to destroy this world, in their own little way.
He accepted an award that, as you wrote, “He himself said he didn’t deserve it.” If you don’t see the problem with someone accepting an unearned award that he, himself, acknowledges he doesn’t deserve, then you are an even worse despicably dumb loser than I thought you were – which is pretty friggin’ bad.
progressoverpeace on October 24, 2009 at 2:58 PM
To be honest, we must make an adjustment to all of these Obama poll results to adjust for Obama’s “RACIST FACTOR”, meaning the percentage of Obama-supporting poll answers that were given for no other reason than Obama’s race.
But how to figure what that Racist Factor number is….
I chose a number based upon the statistic that blacks constitute 22% of the population and voted 95% for Obama, resulting in an estimated Racist Factor poll skew of 12.75%.
So for this poll to be accurately compared to similar polls of previous administrations, you need to apply the Racist Factor number to the reported result of 61%, meaning that, if racism were factored out, the percentage of people who think Obama does not deserve the Nobel Peace Prize is actually 73.75%.
Anybody who figures it differently please post what you think the Racist Factor number should be.
jay12 on October 24, 2009 at 3:02 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »