Dick Armey endorses Hoffman, too

posted at 9:33 am on October 23, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

It looks as though Sarah Palin has begun a hot new trend among Republican activists — endorsing a non-Republican.  Dick Armey, who runs one of the major Tea Party organizing efforts, endorsed Douglas Hoffman yesterday in the special election in New York’s 23rd Congressional district.  It comes as another blow to Republican Dede Scozzafava, who has imploded over the last week:

On Thursday, Dick Armey, former House Majority Leader after the 1994 Conservative Revolution went to New York’s 23rd Congressional District to endorse and campaign for Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman.

The special election, which will be held Nov. 3 to replace former Congressman John McHugh, has unusually important significance for conservatives.  Democrat Bill Owens, and Dede Scozzafava, a Republican who is more liberal than Owens, have been challenged by Mr. Hoffman, a conservative candidate that has captured the support of national leaders like Dick Armey, who’s organization FreedomWorks planned the 9-12 Tea Party rally in Washington, DC.

“We [Republicans] win when we are us. We lose when we are Democrat lite,” he told Redstate.com editor Erick Erickson.  “We attract people by being small government conservatives,” Big Government Republicans, I would tell the Republican Party leadership it cannot win if it insists on recruiting and supporting candidates out of step with the voters.”

Ms. Scozzafava announced she supports Obama’s Stimulus Bill, she is an advocate of Card Check and holds liberal positions on social issues like abortion and homosexual marriage.  The Weekly Standard reports that, if elected, Scozzafava may switch to the Democratic Party for the 2010 elections.

“Listen to Ronald Reagan,” says Armey.  “Reagan said good policy is good politics. My position is to support the candidate who supports policies good for America. That’s what Reagan did too.”

Armey said he does not think the establishment within the Republican Party really understands the mood of the country right now. “There is a sharp difference between now and November. If we knew then what we know now, I doubt Obama would have been elected,” he said.

That statement directly rebuts his former colleague Newt Gingrich, who claimed that Ronald Reagan would have endorsed a pro-choice liberal over a conservative in a special election, too.  Armey focuses on policy rather than party label, which in this case is not terribly difficult to do.  While Scozzafava may not be as far left as some of her detractors argue, she’s certainly no conservative or even a moderate.  What’s more, she’s simply inept — hardly a quality that will rally the conservative base in NY23.

Allahpundit noted last night that Palin’s endorsement carries some moderate risk to her standing if Hoffman loses, especially if he comes in third.  Armey’s endorsement helps Palin, giving her some indirect support, and puts pressure on conservatives within the GOP to follow suit.  Expect Hoffman to collect even more donations and gain more energy from Tea Party enthusiasts in the next two weeks.

Update: This was apparently an open secret before yesterday; I’ve gotten Twitter messages on it since posting this, which point out that Armey actually went public before Palin.  Armey’s press folks only sent the release out this morning, though.

No one can doubt that this is a very public shot across the bow from the Tea Party movement to the GOP, regardless of timing.  Message to the party leadership: Scozzafava is why 73% of Republicans think you’re out of touch.

Update II: Fred Thompson beat them both to it on Tuesday (via The Poolbar on Twitter).

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Newt, you missed this train big guy.

Mr. Joe on October 23, 2009 at 9:36 AM

Allah, I have two words for you: Harriet Miers.

Mr. Joe on October 23, 2009 at 9:36 AM

Armey was earlier.

Traveled to NY to do the press conference yesterday, it was apparently public knowledge it was coming. (I’ve been following this on Green Room’s R.S. McCain links to his blog. He was in NY for the Armey endorsement).

cs89 on October 23, 2009 at 9:37 AM

Dick Army left congress because he told colleagues he wanted to make millions as a lobbyist.

Spathi on October 23, 2009 at 9:38 AM

Newt, you missed this train big guy.

Mr. Joe on October 23, 2009 at 9:36 AM

More like stepped in front of it..

the_nile on October 23, 2009 at 9:38 AM

There is right and wrong. Scozzafava is a terrible replacement candidate and the local GOP leadership were a bunch of idiots and cowards. A stupid choice like Harriet Miers was a stupid choice for the Supreme Court. I am not a third party kind of guy, but sometimes the GOP needs to be slapped around to make a point. Hoffman’s campaign does that. There is no losing here. Scozzafava is unacceptable, the Democrat is a better candidate than she is. And if he loses, Hoffman can run again next cycle in seven months. And Hoffman has a chance of winning now.

Mr. Joe on October 23, 2009 at 9:39 AM

Spathi on October 23, 2009 at 9:38 AM

Relevance?

ladyingray on October 23, 2009 at 9:41 AM

More like stepped in front of it..

the_nile on October 23, 2009 at 9:38 AM

heh

katy on October 23, 2009 at 9:41 AM

Newt needs to STFU and go away….

twiggman on October 23, 2009 at 9:42 AM

Now, if I understand correctly, Hoffman is actually a Republican, who switched to Conservative Party after the county Republican group just threw Dede’s name on the ballot? And the 3rdParty run was the only way he could run, right?

So it’s possible that once he wins, and runs for reelection next year, he could come back to the Republican banner.

JamesLee on October 23, 2009 at 9:42 AM

Dick Army left congress because he told colleagues he wanted to make millions as a lobbyist.

Spathi on October 23, 2009 at 9:38 AM

While democrats stay to do that.

the_nile on October 23, 2009 at 9:42 AM

We must be Moderate in our opinions. We must Reason Together as Moderates. Neither side is right. There is only the abstraction of the Middle. That Platonic form, the vanishing point on the line. That which is Purity Itself.

This extremist discussion of “alternatives” and “well defined positions” is beneath us.

I curse you all.

jeff_from_mpls on October 23, 2009 at 9:43 AM

Newt, you missed this train big guy.

Mr. Joe on October 23, 2009 at 9:36 AM

He was busy chatting with Nancy Pelosi on a park bench.

forest on October 23, 2009 at 9:44 AM

Newt’s a lonely guy here. He’s apparently chosen party over country. Chosen the R brand over values. I am disappointed in that he did not see this coming. He’d do himself a great service by cleaving all ties to this Scozz candidate, walking back his mistake, and putting his shoulder behind Hoffman. If he does not do this, he will be put to political pasture.

ted c on October 23, 2009 at 9:44 AM

Dick Army left congress because he told colleagues he wanted to make millions as a lobbyist.

Spathi on October 23, 2009 at 9:38 AM

Please provide a cite for this. This is a very typical liberal tactic, presenting anecdotal evidence as ‘truth’ see Limbaugh, Rush…

underground on October 23, 2009 at 9:45 AM

What has happened to Newt Gingrich (and Lindsey Graham)? Is this a medication issue? How can previously clear thinkers be so tone deaf and so willing to compromise conservative values?

Sheesh!

The conservative movement needs some new leaders. NOW!

ROCnPhilly on October 23, 2009 at 9:46 AM

I donated to Hoffman last night.

Doug, if you’ve heard the Tea Party Movement. Go to Congress and do dastardly things. Go through there like a wrecking ball, turn over tables, get in faces, stump, filibuster and what the hell… wear the same damn suit every day — we don’t care–just go and do what we’re sending you to do. Stand up for babies, families, economic growth, freedom and liberty. That can’t be too tough now can it, this is the United States of Ame…. well… at least it was…

ted c on October 23, 2009 at 9:47 AM

Scuzzawful would consider switching parties to run in the 2010 election?

How’s that endorsement of yours feel now, Newt, you fool.

Go**am these clueless GOP elites, how did they become so blind?

Bishop on October 23, 2009 at 9:48 AM

The best thing for a RINO these days is to get biatch slapped from coast to coast until they get the damn message. I’d rather have a fat-lipped, black and blue conservative up there who’s been through the wringer than a perfumey anointed one any day.

this year is going to be a bloodsport.

let ‘er rip.

ted c on October 23, 2009 at 9:49 AM

I made a donation to Hoffman last night after reading Palin’s press release. I would love to see what his war chest looks like today.

Any chance Palin will make a public appearance on Hoffman’s behalf? That would be extremely interesting to watch.

joedoe on October 23, 2009 at 9:49 AM

“It looks as though Sarah Palin has begun a hot new trend among Republican activists — endorsing a non-Republican.”

No, No, No, conservative activists have begun endorsing non-Republicans

This is what makes this scary for the Republican Party. Without the conservative PACs and opinion makers the GOP is screwed.

snoopicus on October 23, 2009 at 9:50 AM

Remaking the Republican Party one candidate at a time with or without Newt. He can wiggle out of this, but not for a while. I sure hope McCain and Miss Lindsey are watching this.

BetseyRoss on October 23, 2009 at 9:51 AM

this year is going to be a bloodsport.

let ‘er rip.

ted c on October 23, 2009 at 9:49 AM

Agreed!

Jeff from WI on October 23, 2009 at 9:51 AM

Good Riddance to the new Newt

I miss the 89-94 Newt

bill30097 on October 23, 2009 at 9:52 AM

Note to Newt: The entire Republican Party isn’t going to sell out just to make your Green investments pay off.

Rocks on October 23, 2009 at 9:52 AM

To those who claim that we have to support Sozzafazza because it’s better to have someone who supports us on some of the issues than it is to have someone who supports us on none of the issues, please point to an issue on which Scozzafazza supports us? Just one, it’s all I ask.

As the article points out, Scozzafazza is well to the left of the Democrat in this race. Tell me again how we win, if she does.

MarkTheGreat on October 23, 2009 at 9:52 AM

Dick Armey, Fred Thompson, Sarah Palin. And Hoffman is an unproven nobody.

A stick in the eye of the GOP.

jaime on October 23, 2009 at 9:52 AM

Hmmmm.

IMO Anybody who is dumb enough to hold a press conference in front of her opponent’s political office is not someone who meets the extremely low standards we have for politicians.

Let’s improve the minimum standard for American politicians. You can be grasping, needy, corrupt and engaged with nepotism but at least don’t be a complete and utter dumbass.

memomachine on October 23, 2009 at 9:53 AM

Even if the Democrat were to win. In this district, a real Democrat will be easier to defeat in 2010, than a liberal pretending to be a Republican.

MarkTheGreat on October 23, 2009 at 9:54 AM

this year is going to be a bloodsport.
let ‘er rip.

ted c on October 23, 2009 at 9:49 AM

Let’s roll!

TXUS on October 23, 2009 at 9:54 AM

Where’s the squirrel? I thought there was a squirrel on the podium.

KelliD on October 23, 2009 at 9:54 AM

Good for Armey.

Michael Steele, I hope you are listening. As an independent, I will vote for fiscally conservative, small government Republicans, not for Democrats in Republican clothing.

rbj on October 23, 2009 at 9:55 AM

How bad a GOP candidate do you need to be when the demorat challenger accuses you of being in favor of raising taxes?

Bishop on October 23, 2009 at 9:55 AM

Gingrich and Armey were bff back in the day, Newt speaker, Dick majority leader.

jaime on October 23, 2009 at 9:55 AM

I hope the Republicans use this and the poll as teachable moments for themselves. I doubt they will, but I can dream.

kingsjester on October 23, 2009 at 9:55 AM

The modern-day GOP is our version of the Whigs, and they are doing all they can to destroy themselves. I hope this is a wake-up call, but the last two election cycles weren\’t, so I don\’t hold much hope.

jdawg on October 23, 2009 at 9:55 AM

Even if the Democrat were to win. In this district, a real Democrat will be easier to defeat in 2010, than a liberal pretending to be a Republican.

MarkTheGreat on October 23, 2009 at 9:54 AM

I suspect if Hoffmann loses, he will be back in the Republican primary in 2010.

WashJeff on October 23, 2009 at 9:56 AM

At RNC headquarters, they’re blaming everyone else, they’ll never look in the mirror.

Jeff from WI on October 23, 2009 at 9:57 AM

Famous quote from Dick Armey, back when he was merely an economics professor:

“Why am I a Republican? Because, while most Republicans are a$$holes, ALL Democrats are a$$holes.”

michaelo on October 23, 2009 at 9:57 AM

I suspect if Hoffmann loses, he will be back in the Republican primary in 2010.

WashJeff on October 23, 2009 at 9:56 AM

I agree. I also suspect that regardless of who wins, Scozzafazza is going to come in third.

MarkTheGreat on October 23, 2009 at 9:58 AM

If you are not really a Republican, should you get Republican endorsement simply for claiming to be a Republican? Enough with RINOs, we should not elect someone as a Republican when they will vote with the Democrats more than 50% of the time.

allstonian on October 23, 2009 at 9:58 AM

Someone needs to put Scozzafava on the spot and ask her whether she voted for Obama or McCain in last years Presidential election.

Hellrider on October 23, 2009 at 9:59 AM

Sarah KNOWS that if Hoffman wins, it sends a signal to other Repubs. Newt is thinking defensively. Sarah is on offense.

marklmail on October 23, 2009 at 9:59 AM

Dick Army left congress because he told colleagues he wanted to make millions as a lobbyist.

Spathi on October 23, 2009 at 9:38 AM

liar

bill30097 on October 23, 2009 at 10:01 AM

Everything I’ve read about this candidate selection process is symptomatic of a long problem with the Republican party; i.e. seniority counts for more than ideology.

Couple the seniority argument with the natural inclination to promote your friends over an unknown (to you) ‘outsider’ and you get the modern day Republican party and the circumstances in which the party leadership finds itself.

Skandia Recluse on October 23, 2009 at 10:02 AM

NEVER, EVER FORGET ARLEN SPECTER!

That jerk turned on a dime and now I expect a hideous creature resembling Pelosi to burst out of his chest at any moment!

Enough is enough with these half-ass Republicans. Conservative values do not change, politicians do!

joedoe on October 23, 2009 at 10:02 AM

Palin said she didn’t care what the label was. She meant it.

AnninCA on October 23, 2009 at 10:03 AM

No one can doubt that this is a very public shot across the bow from the Tea Party movement to the GOP, regardless of timing. Message to the party leadership: Scozzafava is why 73% of Republicans think you’re out of touch.

I’d argue that the very public campaign of Scozzafava has probably bumped that number up a few percentage points. The GOP base wants principled candidates not a puffed up pink DIABLO.

highhopes on October 23, 2009 at 10:03 AM

I saw something over the last couple of days about this, from the left (perhaps even Kos? I forget where), how the GOP doesn’t really have “Blue Dogs” like they do. I would argue that Grahmnesty and ilk like him ARE our so-called Blue Dogs.

And just like KOS and others single out, target, and attempt to destroy their Blue Dogs for idiological impurity, we must do the same with ours.

It is no longer a numbers game, simply counting the Rs and Ds after the names. The vast majority of both are crooks, liars, and cheats, masking the truth with rhetoric.

I’m all for ‘big tent,’ and appealing to as many people as possible. Idiological Purity never has nor never will exist, as every individual has a different definition of what they want. But we must all know, understand, and live our core values, whatever they are, and cast our votes accordlingly.

Too often in the past decades, we’ve been given two poor choices, and often end up going with the lesser of the evils, or casting a vote “against” the other guy instead of “for” our own ideals. That is unsustainable, as events are showing.

NY23 *is* a bellweather, but Newt badly miscalculated what it means. True Americans are fed up, and will not bow to the scraps we’ve been fed any longer.

The Boss says it best: Can you hear us NOW?

JamesLee on October 23, 2009 at 10:03 AM

RINOs soon to become extinct. They are now an endangered species. There is no bag limit, road hunting is allowed. You get a reward if you can bag a Dem and a RINO with one shot. (rhetorically speaking of course.)

ted c on October 23, 2009 at 10:03 AM

Update II: Fred Thompson beat them both to it on Tuesday.

Of course he did. He also punched Scozzafava after accepting the Sanger award…and he wasn’t even there.

MadisonConservative on October 23, 2009 at 10:04 AM

Doug Hoffman is beginning to look Armey strong. hehe

hawkman on October 23, 2009 at 10:04 AM

Newt:
Choice between conservative and a republican.

Chooses the republican

Palin:
Choose the conservative

Values matter.

Newt’s got some humble pie to chow down on, must be done today. Scozzafava is under the Tea Party Express bus and that baby is rollin’

ted c on October 23, 2009 at 10:05 AM

NEVER, EVER FORGET ARLEN SPECTER!

That jerk turned on a dime and now I expect a hideous creature resembling Pelosi to burst out of his chest at any moment!

Enough is enough with these half-ass Republicans. Conservative values do not change, politicians do!

joedoe on October 23, 2009 at 10:02 AM

Pelosi may burst out of Specter, but her point of departure will be lower down exit portal.

Mr. Joe on October 23, 2009 at 10:05 AM

Famous quote from Dick Armey, back when he was merely an economics professor:

“Why am I a Republican? Because, while most Republicans are a$$holes, ALL Democrats are a$$holes.”

michaelo on October 23, 2009 at 9:57 AM

If that quote is legit, it is PRICELESS!

+ 1000

Hell even if it isn’t his quote, it’s gonna be mine from now on.

Tim Zank on October 23, 2009 at 10:06 AM

Can anyone explain to me why Ed and AP are giving so many obvious leftists the benefit of the doubt as to their positions and statements lately? I get that they are trying to attract an audience of more than just conservatives but some statements are just hard to understand. Like: \”While Scozzafava may not be as far left as some of her detractors argue, she’s certainly no conservative or even a moderate.\” I know they are busy, but we have to stop giving people the benefit of the doubt when the evidence shows that there is no doubt.

Sporty1946 on October 23, 2009 at 10:06 AM

Donate to Hoffman. He says he needs 125K in a week. Help him out. Let’s pump up his war chest and set the stage for 2010. There needs to be money, poll watchers, defenders and a serious amount of Breitbart like offense on this one.

game time yo!

ted c on October 23, 2009 at 10:06 AM

The Weekly Standard reports that, if elected, Scozzafava may switch to the Democratic Party for the 2010 elections.

This speaks volumes. Anyone that even considers switching to the Corruptocratic Party is not a Republican. Never was nor will be. She is a wolf in sheeps clothing. Wake up Newt, you’ve been hoodwinked.

redridinghood on October 23, 2009 at 10:07 AM

I’d argue that it is one thing to be pro-choice and run; but when someone is pro-choice, for ObamaCare, pro-tax increases, agrees with stimulus bail out, pro-card check, there is a time to say no. This is the time to say no to the GOP and yes to conservative principles.

deidre on October 23, 2009 at 10:07 AM

Newt is thinking defensively. Sarah is on offense.

marklmail on October 23, 2009 at 9:59 AM

Newt is thinking old-school. The time when you could reasonably expect to work with Democrats on legislation. Sarah knows that you can’t work with these people and to support a pink marshmallow that is more Democrat than conservative is just wrong.

highhopes on October 23, 2009 at 10:08 AM

buck up and pull on your big boy and big girl pants. Hoffman needs some dough and needs some backing.
Objective 1: build cash
Objective 2: Scozzafava under bus
Objective 3: crush Democrat like a roach
Objective 4: Hoffman to congress with a mandate to wreck the place (and hold his butt to it)

ted c on October 23, 2009 at 10:08 AM

Dick Armey, Fred Thompson, Sarah Palin. And Hoffman is an unproven nobody.

A stick in the eye of the GOP.

jaime on October 23, 2009 at 9:52 AM

“Unproven Nobody” is a feature, not a bug.

gryphon202 on October 23, 2009 at 10:09 AM

The Weekly Standard reports that, if elected, Scozzafava may switch to the Democratic Party for the 2010 elections.

What on earth was the GOP thinking with this one?

BadgerHawk on October 23, 2009 at 10:09 AM

ditto gryphon.

I’ll take soggy cornflakes conservative over democrat lite any day of the week.

ted c on October 23, 2009 at 10:10 AM

Rick Santorum needs to weigh in on this.

ted c on October 23, 2009 at 10:10 AM

Michael Steele…

rbj on October 23, 2009 at 9:55 AM

Michael Steele? What’s that? I mean ‘What Up’?

Gee whiz.

What’s Steele’s stance on this race?

ROCnPhilly on October 23, 2009 at 10:11 AM

This is the time to say no to the GOP and yes to conservative principles.

deidre on October 23, 2009 at 10:07 AM

And time to find new leadership for the NY GOP! What the *&^* were these people thinking?

highhopes on October 23, 2009 at 10:11 AM

gryphon 202 on October 23, 2009 at 10:09 AM

“UNPROVEN NOBODY”

Compared to whom: he is a CPA and businessman with apparently multiple outlets.

Do you think Hoffman would do a worse job that Obama and his economic henchmen? C’mon get real.

technopeasant on October 23, 2009 at 10:13 AM

RINOs soon to become extinct. They are now an endangered species. There is no bag limit, road hunting is allowed. You get a reward if you can bag a Dem and a RINO with one shot. (rhetorically speaking of course.)

ted c on October 23, 2009 at 10:03 AM

Happiness is a warm gun.

/rhet

TXUS on October 23, 2009 at 10:13 AM

Former presidential candidate Steve Forbes, chief executive officer of Forbes Inc., will endorse Doug Hoffman, the Conservative Party candidate in New York’s 23rd congressional district. A source close to the campaign tells NRO that “many more conservatives will be announcing their support in coming days.”

Forbes would’ve been a great president. But the RNC gave us Bush… then McCain…

mankai on October 23, 2009 at 10:13 AM

I sent Hoffman 25 bucks last night and I know little, or nothing about the guy. Palin said he was the conservative choice and that was good enough for me.

If her million faithful facebook followers would each send the guy 10 bucks, he would have one helluva war chest!

It would be great if she made a public appearance for the guy and drew a crowd in the thousands. That would really make the W.H. nervous. lol

joedoe on October 23, 2009 at 10:15 AM

Rick Santorum needs to weigh in on this.

ted c on October 23, 2009 at 10:10 AM

He weighed in on Hoffman’s side. He claims he’s above party.

BUT, as I wrote to him at the time… I will NEVER let him forget his endorsement of RINO Specter over Toomey. He’s trying to jump on this bandwagon while ignoring his own betrayal.

mankai on October 23, 2009 at 10:15 AM

I’m thinking Hoffman is going to get a lot of money. This is awesome!!!!

deidre on October 23, 2009 at 10:15 AM

And time to find new leadership for the NY GOP!

highhopes on October 23, 2009 at 10:11 AM

FIFY

How can the GOP be so out of touch? It needs defunding. Any encouragement will be taken as endorsement of their ‘Destroy America More Slowly’ agenda.

ROCnPhilly on October 23, 2009 at 10:16 AM

What on earth was the GOP thinking with this one?

BadgerHawk on October 23, 2009 at 10:09 AM

Save that comment… so you can save yourself some time and just paste it 400 times over the next year or so.

mankai on October 23, 2009 at 10:17 AM

Donate to Hoffman. He says he needs 125K in a week. Help him out. Let’s pump up his war chest and set the stage for 2010. There needs to be money, poll watchers, defenders and a serious amount of Breitbart like offense on this one.

game time yo!

ted c on October 23, 2009 at 10:06 AM

I’m so there! Gave before Armey or Palin endorsed. I suggest every conservative/libertarian at Hot Air do the same. If we don’t stand up against the GOP elite now, when? Send them a message! We won’t put up with Grahamnesty’s or Snowe’s, or McCain’s, or Scozzafava’s any more! Here’s our chance to make a statement. Let’s roll!

Christian Conservative on October 23, 2009 at 10:19 AM

And for those wanting to donate — here’s a quick link.

Christian Conservative on October 23, 2009 at 10:20 AM

If Dede can’t handle some nerd from The Weekly Standard asking her questions, she is going to fantastically fail in Congress.

Speedwagon82 on October 23, 2009 at 10:22 AM

Rick Santorum needs to weigh in on this.

ted c on October 23, 2009 at 10:10 AM

I may be missing the sarcasm. That said, he has:

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MGM1MDNiZjkyMzcwMzY0YTliYzBiNGM5MjcwZWM5YTM=

Steve Forbes has weighed in too:

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZDZiMjQ2OGEwMjZlMTk5YTg0Y2ViZThmMmVmY2I4ZWI=

BuckeyeSam on October 23, 2009 at 10:22 AM

The traditional GOP simply is out of touch. It cracks me up to see them suggest that others are splitting the party. Frankly, it’s the traditional GOP who are being obstinate. I can’t imagine a clearer message than has already been sent over the past few months.

Find good conservative candidates, and there won’t be a problem.

AnninCA on October 23, 2009 at 10:23 AM

ARE YOU LISTENING?

/lady gaga

faraway on October 23, 2009 at 10:23 AM

What on earth was the GOP thinking with this one?

BadgerHawk on October 23, 2009 at 10:09 AM

Big tent. Ignore conservative principles and hope that enough moderate Democrats “like” the Republican that they don’t have to pay attention to the social conservatives and Jesus freaks.

highhopes on October 23, 2009 at 10:24 AM

Mark Davis is on Dallas radio screaming SCREAMING Huffman “can not win!”. Of couse he said Obama could’t either and Al Gore would never in a million years pick a Jewish running mate. Davis is very lucky he’s not subbing for Rush today .

Marcus on October 23, 2009 at 10:26 AM

What on earth was the GOP thinking with this one?

BadgerHawk on October 23, 2009 at 10:09 AM

Save that comment… so you can save yourself some time and just paste it 400 times over the next year or so.

mankai on October 23, 2009 at 10:17 AM

I think Ed and AP are just going to have a button added after “Close Tags” to place in this comment.

WashJeff on October 23, 2009 at 10:29 AM

Stand up for babies, families, economic growth, freedom and liberty. That can’t be too tough now can it, this is the United States of Ame…. well… at least it was…

ted c on October 23, 2009

The once and future greatest nation on the planet.

SKYFOX on October 23, 2009 at 10:30 AM

How can the GOP be so out of touch? It needs defunding. Any encouragement will be taken as endorsement of their ‘Destroy America More Slowly’ agenda.

ROCnPhilly on October 23, 2009 at 10:16 AM

I’ve already done my part. I donate to specific politicians but not to the GOP in general. They don’t deserve the support when they contribute to candidates like Scozzafava or Susan Collins.

highhopes on October 23, 2009 at 10:31 AM

Thanks for the link, Ed!

flipflop on October 23, 2009 at 10:31 AM

The traditional GOP simply is out of touch. It cracks me up to see them suggest that others are splitting the party. Frankly, it’s the traditional GOP who are being obstinate. I can’t imagine a clearer message than has already been sent over the past few months.

The GOP is about Party and power and conservatives are about principles. All of their talk about “branding” sickens me, they think they can sell an empty box as long as it has pretty packaging. We’re politically involved because we want what’s best for our country and our families, not because we want to make DC fat cats fatter.

obladioblada on October 23, 2009 at 10:32 AM

I’m so there! Gave before Armey or Palin endorsed. I suggest every conservative/libertarian at Hot Air do the same. If we don’t stand up against the GOP elite now, when? Send them a message! We won’t put up with Grahamnesty’s or Snowe’s, or McCain’s, or Scozzafava’s any more! Here’s our chance to make a statement. Let’s roll!

Christian Conservative on October 23, 2009 at 10:19 AM

Sent him the max last week myself, but any amount and by as many people as possible will send Steele, Gingrich, and ALL of them a strong message for 2010… even should Hoffman not pull it off.

But I think he will.

TXUS on October 23, 2009 at 10:33 AM

Boortz and Forbes to endorse Hoffman.

artist on October 23, 2009 at 10:33 AM

From Hoffman’s site:

Rush Limbaugh spent considerable time talking Doug up on his show today.

mankai on October 23, 2009 at 10:34 AM

Dede is just from the pro-abortion, welfare state, wealth redistribution, progressive taxation wing of the GOP big tent. Geez, what’s the problem, people?

mankai on October 23, 2009 at 10:36 AM

Rush Limbaugh spent considerable time talking Doug up on his show today.
mankai on October 23, 2009 at 10:34 AM

yesterday’s show?
which hour?

ted c on October 23, 2009 at 10:36 AM

Rick Santorum needs to weigh in on this.

ted c on October 23, 2009 at 10:10 AM
I may be missing the sarcasm. That said, he has:

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MGM1MDNiZjkyMzcwMzY0YTliYzBiNGM5MjcwZWM5YTM=

Steve Forbes has weighed in too:

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZDZiMjQ2OGEwMjZlMTk5YTg0Y2ViZThmMmVmY2I4ZWI=

BuckeyeSam on October 23, 2009 at 10:22 AM

cool thanks. I didn’t know that SAntorum had weighed in on it. muchas gracias.

ted c on October 23, 2009 at 10:38 AM

Conservative first, Republican if they back a conservative. No RINOs or moderates need apply. If you want to reach across the aisle don’t extend the same hand to me for money.

Oldnuke on October 23, 2009 at 10:41 AM

Dede is just from the pro-abortion, welfare state, wealth redistribution, progressive taxation wing of the GOP big tent. Geez, what’s the problem, people?

mankai on October 23, 2009 at 10:36 AM

Love it.

j_galt on October 23, 2009 at 10:45 AM

Comment pages: 1 2