Don Surber writes, “CNN’s numbers drop 68% in prime to last place” — despite being an official Obama-approved TV network. Gosh, go figure:

I have been reporting CNN’s bad numbers for some time and now it will be official when the Oct…

Notice that she said “last night”? As in when the untelevised interviews were conducted?
Not “today, when we’re setting up the on-camera interviews”?
skylark on October 24, 2009 at 4:29 PM

Uhm you completely missed the point.

Claim. Anita Dunn, the admin had nothing to do with the list. Anita Dunn is “out of the loop.

Claim. The list was prepared/compiled by Treasury

Claim. Fox did not ask to be on the list.

All these claims fall apart when it is stated that Anita Dunn had the list AND Fox is on the list.

We now know I was right and Anita Dunn/the admin were lying their teeth off!

Fact. Fox did ask to be on the list.

Fact. The list was prepared/compiled by Treasury and included Fox.

Fact. The list, including Fox was sent to Anita Dunn/the admin.

Fact. The list went back to Treasury.

Fact. Treasury called the pool and informed them of the interview schedule and Fox was not on the list of who would be doing interviews.

The now proven lying Admin/ Anita Dunn are claiming it was some unnamed unknown low level Treasury worker that F-ed up the list.

This I believe is also a lie.

About a week after Obama won I was at a dinner party. I told the guests there that fascism was on the way and that within 5 years this country would be like Venezuela. Everyone said I was crazy.

Everyone must go out and read or re-read ‘Rules For Radicals’, Glenn Beck obviously has. In fact he has elevated it to an art form they couldn’t even dream of. Reading ‘Rules For Radicals’ will serve two very important lessons. The First lesson is; you will instantly realize where everything emanating out of this administration comes from. These people are all radicals; and they have no use or interest in winning hearts and minds for good reason. The dirty secret is they very much still believe in Eugenics. IE. People are genetically predisposed to either be slaves or freedom craving. Freedom Craving people can’t be won over, and more importantly, they just pollute the “good slaves” gene pool. Freedom Craving people must literally be destroyed. And second: Hopefully you will be blessed with the realization that Marquess of Queensberry rules on your part just won’t cut it with these people. There is only one way to destroy them, which is with their own venomous sword. In the war against socialist slavery you must accept that these Un-American Anti-Constitutionalist don’t have the right to even exist let alone govern. These people have no honor so there is no dishonor in defeating them on their own terms. Their only allegiance to this ideology of socialist slavery is of course, if they get to be the MASTERS over it.

I was wrong in one aspect I suppose. It wasn’t 5 years, it was less than 1.

We certainly give these broadcast networks plenty of criticism. Let’s take a moment to recognize their integrity.

I’m not certain is is entirely integrity.

If you look, no party holds for more than 8-12 years in a row with the Presidency. If you let Obama block all Conservative news now, whet happens in 4, 8, or at most 12 years? Everyone who doesn’t stand up now gets to sit in the corner later.

Of course that means the MSM paid attention and are capable of thinking about and planning for the future. Which isn’t entirely about “integrity” but it still is well beyond what I thought they were capable of.

Even if it isn’t “integrity” it is something I didn’t believe these guys were capable of… so that’s definitely something impressive.

That Fox NOISE network had a vendetta against Ron Paul in the primaries.

I have hard time finding any sympathy for the Roger Ailes Network because I despise them so much.

Spathi343 on October 24, 2009 at 7:51 AM

A candidate like RP would be more impactful if he carried himself a bit differently. RP tends to go off a little bit and it comes off trippy.

So sorry, Troofer, but as you recall I debunked your lie about Fox shutting Ron Paul out of the NH debate yesterday. He was invited, and he did not respond to the invite.

Didn’t matter anyway, as the debate NEVER TOOK PLACE

Now please, kid. Give us credible, multi-sourced evidence that Fox News is not a news organization. No one else here has been able to do so.

Del Dolemonte on October 24, 2009 at 2:35 PM

Hey Rushtard, not everyone who supports RP is truther.

Link

He made it clear that the omission came via the Treasury Department, simply saying “Fox was not included on that list.” He then made it clear that the WH immediately gave the thumbs up.

If Treasury was only going by those interviewers who actually requested an on-camera interview, it’s quite plausible that they just didn’t understand that all networks were automatically included on any pooled camera arrangement.

Why was Fox on Anita Dunn list of those who wanted to interview Feinberg, but not on the Treasury list?

“Anita Dunn, yes and Fox’s Major Garrett was among the correspondents to interview Feinberg last night’”

Somebody’s lying big time!

Notice that she said “last night”? As in when the untelevised interviews were conducted?

Not “today, when we’re setting up the on-camera interviews”?

That Fox NOISE network had a vendetta against Ron Paul in the primaries.

I have hard time finding any sympathy for the Roger Ailes Network because I despise them so much.

Spathi343 on October 24, 2009 at 7:51 AM

So sorry, Troofer, but as you recall I debunked your lie about Fox shutting Ron Paul out of the NH debate yesterday. He was invited, and he did not respond to the invite.

Didn’t matter anyway, as the debate NEVER TOOK PLACE

Now please, kid. Give us credible, multi-sourced evidence that Fox News is not a news organization. No one else here has been able to do so.

Spathi on October 24, 2009 at 7:51 AM

No one here cares.

Yeah…one of the few politicians who’s willing to point out that our financial system is based on worthless paper and empty promises, and who hasn’t quit partway through his term (HINT HINT)…good grief.

The Balloon Boy ‘news coverage’ was the absolute last straw for me with any big-name network. I now officially do not give a rip about anything besides weather severe storm coverage or anything that isn’t really close-to-home local and severe. (riots, major fires, etc.)

Ya I can kind of tolerate Glen Beck.

He’s the only one though. I can’t say I totally trust his opinion either but just that he’s tolerable.

Spathi on October 24, 2009 at 7:51 AM

Yeah…one of the few politicians who’s willing to point out that our financial system is based on worthless paper and empty promises, and who hasn’t quit partway through his term (HINT HINT)…good grief.

The Balloon Boy ‘news coverage’ was the absolute last straw for me with any big-name network. I now officially do not give a rip about anything besides weather severe storm coverage or anything that isn’t really close-to-home local and severe. (riots, major fires, etc.)

I have hard time finding any sympathy for the Roger Ailes Network because I despise them so much.

Creative.
Grow Fins on October 23, 2009 at 3:56 PM

Uhm the statement from the link YOU provided about being a ‘journalist’ is from ABC!!

ABC NEWS STATEMENT ON JOHN STOSSEL
“John is a unique figure in American journalism and will be an asset to Fox News in this next chapter of his terrific career.”

Funny how you missed that!

BTW, can you tell the difference tween “regular” reporting and an opinion show?

Racist!

Fallen Sparrow

Racist.

ZJPolitical

Idiots