Police: Scozzofava call not justified

posted at 10:55 am on October 21, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

If a candidate wants to build some credibility as a Republican candidate for an election in which she faces both a Democrat and a conservative, would calling the police on a reporter from a conservative publication help or hurt that effort?  It might help if the call had any justification at all.  Unfortunately for Dede Scozzofava, the police all but told the Associated Press that she overreacted to a normal exchange:

Police questioned a reporter from a conservative publication after receiving a call that he harassed a Republican candidate for Congress who refused to answer his questions about her positions on tax and health issues.

Lowville Village Police Chief Eric Fredenburg said officers responded to a call Monday night saying state Assemblywoman Dierdre Scozzafava “felt concern for her safety” during questioning by reporter John McCormack of the Weekly Standard. He wouldn’t say who made the call.

“I don’t believe it ever escalated to anything that would ever be classified as an emergency,” Fredenburg said.

No charges were filed against McCormack.

And the AP hints that Scozzofava may have been dishonest about it from the beginning (emphasis mine):

In a statement released Tuesday to the blog Politico, Scozzafava’s campaign said the reporter “repeatedly screamed questions (in-your-face-style),” but later issued a statement deleting the accusation.

So what did John say that frightened Scozzofava so much?  He asked her about her position on Card Check (she supports it), abortion (she supports it), and whether she would vote for a health care bill that raised taxes and covered abortions.  No wonder Scozzofava panicked!

Jazz Shaw, who earlier had given Scozzofava a shot in this race, says that should just about finish her:

That’s the kind of “grilling” that results in a call to the police? And this woman plans on moving in to the hot-house environment on the Hill? Congratulations, Democrats. I think you’re in line to grab yet another seat in the House. Yeesh. I still maintain that the local party officials have the right to select and push their own chosen candidate for the primaries, but it’s hard to imagine how they settled on this one.

I know John McCormack, having met him a couple of times at events, and having interviewed him on my show a few times.  It’s hard to imagine a calmer, friendlier person in the media than John.  He makes Minnesota Nice look like a home playoff game at Yankee Stadium.  There may be some reporters who would get in the face of a candidate in the way Dede Scozzofava imagined this week, but not John McCormack.  What an embarrassment, especially for those national Republicans who went out of their way to endorse Scozzofava like Newt Gingrich.

Hopefully, Douglas Hoffman can take advantage of the situation.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

And let this be a lesson to Newt…we may know more then your narrow elitist mind allows you to…being conservative does not mean you belong to the “right” club.

right2bright on October 21, 2009 at 10:57 AM

CUT HER LOOSE NOW!

Enoxo on October 21, 2009 at 10:59 AM

Kool-Aide…it does a body good!

BobMbx on October 21, 2009 at 10:59 AM

Your majesty, your majesty, the peasants are revolting!

That’s right, they stink on ice!

/Mel Brooks

rbj on October 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM

No post on her leaking emails to TPM?

:-/

Abby Adams on October 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM

It’s for the best that Scuzzy-fever not win this race. If Hoffman wins, it’s a victory for conservatives. And if the Dem wins, it’s a moral victory for conservatives(especially if Hoffman comes in 2nd). He can easily take the seat in 2010 and the GOP “leadership” will learn an embarrassing but valuable lesson about how not to select candidates for the upcoming midterms.

Doughboy on October 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM

CUT HER LOOSE NOW!

Enoxo on October 21, 2009 at 10:59 AM

Throw her under the bus along with Newt.

RickZ on October 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM

Mark Steyn… she’s a DIABLO – Democrat in all but label only.

mankai on October 21, 2009 at 11:01 AM

It’s time for a RINO hunt.

Percy_Peabody on October 21, 2009 at 11:02 AM

Newt! Release your portfolio! Why are you selling out just to pad your green investments?

Rocks on October 21, 2009 at 11:02 AM

I have got to put an e-mail filter on for anything containing “Newt” in the From or Subject fields. Go sit with Pelosi again for another Global Warming commercial.

WashJeff on October 21, 2009 at 11:02 AM

I think I’m done with Newt.

flipflop on October 21, 2009 at 11:02 AM

Throw her under the bus along with Newt.

RickZ on October 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM

Could prove ugly. Not enough clearance.

katy on October 21, 2009 at 11:03 AM

This entire fiasco says more about Newt and some of our GOP betters than it does about Scozzofava. She’s a typical liberal tool willing to say or do anything to get elected.

flyfisher on October 21, 2009 at 11:04 AM

I looked on the web, but couldn’t find anything polling data. Is there any polling data?

Oil Can on October 21, 2009 at 11:05 AM

katy on October 21, 2009 at 11:03 AM

Snarky. Love it.

publiuspen on October 21, 2009 at 11:05 AM

This female is a worthless piece of human kind…..liar and cheater just to prop herself into good light is pathetic. She is shining light on the *What kind of Elected Official ought not to be like.*

hawkman on October 21, 2009 at 11:05 AM

Did she since answer the ? the police rescued her from? Specifically about the health bill and mandatory abortion coverage. (“POLICE!”)

Marcus on October 21, 2009 at 11:06 AM

Please call the NRCC (202) 479-7000. Ask to speak to Jesse Roman and ask what their criteria is for supporting candidates. He will tell you it is up to the state parties and NRCC “doesn’t want to meddle” so be prepared to ask the followup question of whether there is a litmus test for supporting candidates.

He will respond with all the great things Dede has done (like signing something to not raise taxes). Go in armed with info from Malkin’s site. Make sure to tell them that it isn’t what a candidate says or signs, but what they DO. Make sure to remind him that she supported a massive tax increase in NY, voted for a 180M state bank bailout, and verbally supported the 1T Obama stimulus.

The *only* thing this woman has to her credit is support of gun rights, but since she has proven to be a woman who doesn’t live up to her word, how can we know this to be true.

Call the RNC too at 202.863.8500, only they won’t answer and the mailbox was full this morning.

We must make them march to our beat, not us to them! Hold them accountable!

PrincipledPilgrim on October 21, 2009 at 11:07 AM

Hoffman could use some dough if you have some extra lying around. He is a good candidate.

doctormom on October 21, 2009 at 11:07 AM

Come on Jazz… there’s a third candidate in this race… and he’s on the rise!

Red Cloud on October 21, 2009 at 11:07 AM

Doughboy on October 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM

Right on.

NebCon on October 21, 2009 at 11:07 AM

Lets hope she does the right thing and quit for the good of the people. I wish the police would file charges for filing a false report.
I hope Newt backs away from this and keeps his mouth shut from now on.

Brat4life on October 21, 2009 at 11:08 AM

I looked on the web, but couldn’t find anything polling data. Is there any polling data?

Oil Can on October 21, 2009 at 11:05 AM

I believe the latest poll had the Dem at either 33 or 35%, Scuzzy-fever at 29% and Hoffman at 23%. Allegedly the internal polling shows Scuzzy-fever even lower, and that was before this debacle with the police.

Bottom line is that if the GOP forced Scuzzy out, most of her supporters would vote for Hoffman and he’d win in a landslide. If candidates like her are their strategy for retaking Congress next year, I may find myself on the third party bandwagon before long.

Doughboy on October 21, 2009 at 11:08 AM

It’s time for a RINO hunt.

Percy_Peabody on October 21, 2009 at 11:02 AM

We don’t have to hunt them, just shake the can and they rise to the top like Brazil nuts.

thomasaur on October 21, 2009 at 11:09 AM

So what did John say that frightened Scozzofava so much? He asked her about her position on Card Check (she supports it), abortion (she supports it), and whether she would vote for a health care bill that raised taxes and covered abortions. No wonder Scozzofava panicked!

I’m frightened that this creature calls herself a Republican. I know the GOP is trying for the big tent but when did that mean including ugly liberal Democrats?

highhopes on October 21, 2009 at 11:10 AM

Newt may have done it with this one …

tarpon on October 21, 2009 at 11:12 AM

Oh yea, Jesse from NRCC told me that this has to do with the internal schism as to whether to make the party more conservative or “big tent.” I told him they could make that tent as large as they wanted but it ought to be plenty spacious after they alienate their base.

I told him that if I’d rather have quick poison by dems than a slow death by the GOP.

PrincipledPilgrim on October 21, 2009 at 11:12 AM

I’m frightened that this creature calls herself a Republican. I know the GOP is trying for the big tent but when did that mean including ugly liberal Democrats?

highhopes on October 21, 2009 at 11:10 AM

I think the GOP bigwigs have been reading one too many David Brooks columns. They really don’t get it.

Doughboy on October 21, 2009 at 11:12 AM

Bottom line is that if the GOP forced Scuzzy out, most of her supporters would vote for Hoffman and he’d win in a landslide. If candidates like her are their strategy for retaking Congress next year, I may find myself on the third party bandwagon before long.

Doughboy on October 21, 2009 at 11:08 AM

What the GOP wants is the “R” and what most of America wants is a Conservative…the GOP, and especially Newt, needs to wake up and realize that the “good ol boys club” needs to swing open their doors and embrace conservatives, libertarians (if you can find a logical one), and even democrats that are quasi conservative (Lieberman was a good example).

right2bright on October 21, 2009 at 11:12 AM

Hoffman on Beck now.

marklmail on October 21, 2009 at 11:13 AM

Mark Steyn… she’s a DIABLO – Democrat in all but label only.

mankai on October 21, 2009 at 11:01 AM

Finally a term for the super-RINOs!

highhopes on October 21, 2009 at 11:13 AM

I think the GOP bigwigs have been reading one too many David Brooks columns. They really don’t get it.

Doughboy on October 21, 2009 at 11:12 AM

Make them “get it” by placing lots of calls asking hard questions (we have to play media these days), not donating, and voting.

PrincipledPilgrim on October 21, 2009 at 11:14 AM

This is just unbelievable, it looks like the GOP went out of their way to select the most repugnant candidate possible.

Democrats are laughably incompetent when it comes to governing, but at least they know how to run campaigns. When’s the last time they inserted even a marginally conservative candidate into a sure seat?

NoDonkey on October 21, 2009 at 11:14 AM

Newt may have done it with this one …

tarpon on October 21, 2009 at 11:12 AM

Newt did it a long time ago. I wish he would shut up and go away. Rush called him out on it and won’t have him on his show anymore. I’m glad for that.

PrincipledPilgrim on October 21, 2009 at 11:15 AM

Oh yea, Jesse from NRCC told me that this has to do with the internal schism as to whether to make the party more conservative or “big tent.” I told him they could make that tent as large as they wanted but it ought to be plenty spacious after they alienate their base.

I told him that if I’d rather have quick poison by dems than a slow death by the GOP.

PrincipledPilgrim on October 21, 2009 at 11:12 AM

I get the big tent argument, but shouldn’t there be some nonnegotiables? They’ve got to understand that their base is made up of people who won’t negotiate on certain core principles. They risk their base running out the back door as they usher these libs in the front.

flyfisher on October 21, 2009 at 11:15 AM

I think the GOP bigwigs have been reading one too many David Brooks columns. They really don’t get it.

Doughboy on October 21, 2009 at 11:12 AM

I’m so through with the GOP “leaders” who keep insisting the way forward is to sacrifice principles in the name of electabilty. Skuzzy should never have been supported by the GOP because of her positions.

highhopes on October 21, 2009 at 11:16 AM

Could prove ugly. Not enough clearance.

katy

LOL

beachgirlusa on October 21, 2009 at 11:16 AM

Newts been picking his toes in Poughkeepsie.

portlandon on October 21, 2009 at 11:17 AM

I get the big tent argument, but shouldn’t there be some nonnegotiables? They’ve got to understand that their base is made up of people who won’t negotiate on certain core principles. They risk their base running out the back door as they usher these libs in the front.

flyfisher on October 21, 2009 at 11:15 AM

I know. I don’t get it. Apparently the Bush spanking had no effect, nor did the McCain spanking afterward. Talk about learning lessons the hard way…..

PrincipledPilgrim on October 21, 2009 at 11:17 AM

What the GOP wants is the “R” and what most of America wants is a Conservative…the GOP, and especially Newt, needs to wake up and realize that the “good ol boys club” needs to swing open their doors and embrace conservatives, libertarians (if you can find a logical one), and even democrats that are quasi conservative (Lieberman was a good example).

right2bright on October 21, 2009 at 11:12 AM

But they could’ve easily had a conservative “R” in this district. It’s a sure thing even in bad years for the GOP(which this is certainly not).

This big tent defense is a load of BS. I’ll buy that for someone they wanna put up against Pelosi in her district. But to nominate someone like Scuzzy in NY-23 means either 1) they’re doing a terrible job vetting their candidates or 2) the GOP is run by a bunch of libs and Rockafeller-style Republicans who reject conservatism.

Doughboy on October 21, 2009 at 11:18 AM

PrincipledPilgrim on October 21, 2009 at 11:07 AM

I wish I had seen your comment before I called. I just called and talked to some peon who ansered the phone. I filled that poor staffer’s ear!!! He said they had been getting lots of calls.
I told him I no longer considered myself a Republican, and they were going to lose the 2010 election if they kept this up. I also informed him I would not be contributing to the RNC. I said that I noticed the RNC didn’t have as many contributions this last quarter as the dems. Hope that one comment stuck in his brain…

lovingmyUSA on October 21, 2009 at 11:18 AM

They’ve got to understand that their base is made up of people who won’t negotiate on certain core principles. They risk their base running out the back door as they usher these libs in the front.

flyfisher on October 21, 2009 at 11:15 AM

The McCain wing of the GOP hates Christian and social conservatives. They go out of their way to alienate this part of the base and consider these groups to be fringe parts of the party. What they don’t get is they are the ones who don’t represent the rank and file of the GOP. It’s time to take the party back from bastards like McCain.

highhopes on October 21, 2009 at 11:19 AM

This big tent defense is a load of BS. I’ll buy that for someone they wanna put up against Pelosi in her district. But to nominate someone like Scuzzy in NY-23 means either 1) they’re doing a terrible job vetting their candidates or 2) the GOP is run by a bunch of libs and Rockafeller-style Republicans who reject conservatism.

Doughboy on October 21, 2009 at 11:18 AM

Or both.

PrincipledPilgrim on October 21, 2009 at 11:19 AM

If Scuzza keeps this up Palin won’t have to go NY to help Hoffman out…

CCRWM on October 21, 2009 at 11:19 AM

lovingmyUSA on October 21, 2009 at 11:18 AM

Call them back. You’ll be talking to a different person this time. :-)

PrincipledPilgrim on October 21, 2009 at 11:22 AM

Questions from a reporter makes Scozzofava’s staff call the police? Sure don’t want to think what questions from John Q. Public at a townhall meeting would make her do.

Go away RINO and let a conservative do the job.

yoda on October 21, 2009 at 11:22 AM

I still maintain that the local party officials have the right to select and push their own chosen candidate for the primaries, but it’s hard to imagine how they settled on this one.

Does Jazz have this right? I don’t think the locals did — from the reporting, it was the RHC that tried to shove this candidate down the throat of the local party.

As for Hoffman, he has a (C) after his name. I’m not sure whether the (C) stands for Conservative or Constitutional. If it stands for Constitutional, I doubt I’ll be supporting him further — truthers and the such are not my cup of tea.

unclesmrgol on October 21, 2009 at 11:24 AM

She suffers from “Hilary Phobia”.

She probably reported a sniper shot at her.

Hening on October 21, 2009 at 11:24 AM

This “lady” is doubleing down on the stuck on stupid she is holding an event in Watertown guess where in front of Hoffman’s Office.

Dede Scozzafava invites press to meet her in front of opponent’s headquarters (Desperate Dede)
Syracuse.Com
Watertown, NY — Dede Scozzafava, the Republican candidate in the hot 23rd Congressional District race, picked an unusual spot for a news conference this morning — the sidewalk in front of the Watertown headquarters of her Conservative opponent, Doug Hoffman.

“Doug Hoffman and (Democrat) Bill Owens continue to dodge, duck and bob and weave and don’t want to talk about the issues in debate, so we think it’s a great backdrop to stop over and ask what the holdup is in agreeing to debates,” said Matt Burns, speaking for the Scozzafava campaign.

Scozzafava’s opponents “continue to hide behind 30-second television commercials and surrogates and it’s a disservice to voters,” Burns said. Scozzafava wants them to debate “the important issues of the campaign” such as job creation, health care reform and whether to cut Medicare to seniors, he said.

Scozzafava also planned to ask that Owens reimburse the cost to taxpayers of having President Barack Obama speak at an Owen fundraiser Tuesday in New York City, Burns said.

The news conference at 106 Court St., Watertown, was scheduled for 8:30 a.m.View full sizeDoug Hoffman

“Dede Scozzafava is either extremely cynical or has a very short memory,” Hoffman campaign spokesman Rob Ryan said in a prepared response. “On Aug. 19, 2009, the Hoffman campaign challenged Dede Scozzafava to a series of three to five debates across the district. We asked the Republican county chairs to sponsor them. The Hoffman campaign even offered to pick up the rental costs of the venues. Both Scozzafava and the GOP county chairs refused.

“Dede Scozzafava is desperate; she flip-flops on issue after issue, she calls the police on reporters, and now she claims she hasn’t had an opportunity to debate. It’s sad,” Ryan said. “Dede Scozzafava’s staff needs to tell her that she’s the spoiler in this race and that for the good of the Republican Party and her own reputation she should drop out of the race now.”

Owens campaign officials were not immediately available for comment.

Clyde5445 on October 21, 2009 at 11:25 AM

They’ve got to understand that their base is made up of people who won’t negotiate on certain core principles. They risk their base running out the back door as they usher these libs in the front.

flyfisher on October 21, 2009 at 11:15 AM
The McCain wing of the GOP hates Christian and social conservatives. They go out of their way to alienate this part of the base and consider these groups to be fringe parts of the party. What they don’t get is they are the ones who don’t represent the rank and file of the GOP. It’s time to take the party back from bastards like McCain.

highhopes on October 21, 2009 at 11:19 AM

I’m one of those crazy Christian social cons and I WILL NEVER compromise on life. That said, I abhor taxes and believe the best government is one I don’t notice, which means no spending. I want the government to leave me and my family alone. I also believe in robust national security and border protection. I hate these anti-American globalist tools. Am I being unreasonable to expect the GOP to field candidates of like mind?

flyfisher on October 21, 2009 at 11:26 AM

It would be nice if this also forces Newt into well deserved obscurity. He’s beginning to be our Jimmy Carter.

a capella on October 21, 2009 at 11:26 AM

Just sent back another “survey” from the RNC saying I will never give to them again as long as they support RINO’s. This is a perfect example. (I wonder how much RNC money Arlen Spectre got?) But I recently gave to Michele Bachmann’s campaign fund.

Christian Conservative on October 21, 2009 at 11:27 AM

I still maintain that the local party officials have the right to select and push their own chosen candidate for the primaries, but it’s hard to imagine how they settled on this one.

They have the right, but the national organizations like NRCC and RNC should have a litmus test, eh? Otherwise, the states could theoretically take over the national bodies.

I give up. I think the whole world has gone mad!

PrincipledPilgrim on October 21, 2009 at 11:27 AM

At this point I’m pretty much done with Newt. Screw that guy.

rollthedice on October 21, 2009 at 11:27 AM

It would be nice if this also forces Newt into well deserved obscurity. He’s beginning to be our Jimmy Carter.

a capella on October 21, 2009 at 11:26 AM

+1

PrincipledPilgrim on October 21, 2009 at 11:28 AM

Just sent back another “survey” from the RNC saying I will never give to them again as long as they support RINO’s. This is a perfect example. (I wonder how much RNC money Arlen Spectre got?) But I recently gave to Michele Bachmann’s campaign fund.

Christian Conservative on October 21, 2009 at 11:27 AM

Direct contributions are the way I’m going until the RNC gets its act together. This is the worst time in American history for the RNC to be in the shape it’s in.

flyfisher on October 21, 2009 at 11:30 AM

Heh. Beck just said she has been endorsed by the Daily Kos. I think he was serious. Can anyone confirm? Because you know … we can’t get any nwes from Fox anymore.

FerfeLaBat on October 21, 2009 at 11:30 AM

As for Hoffman, he has a (C) after his name. I’m not sure whether the (C) stands for Conservative or Constitutional. If it stands for Constitutional, I doubt I’ll be supporting him further — truthers and the such are not my cup of tea.

unclesmrgol on October 21, 2009 at 11:24 AM

I’m pretty sure it’s Conservative, not Constitutional. Doug Hoffman is no truther; not as near as I can tell, and I like to think I’ve done my homework on this.

Normally in New York, the Conservative Party rolls over and endorses the Republican candidate reflexively. Newt seemed more than a little surprised they didn’t this time. I think it’s a major wrench in Republican party politics, and I couldn’t be happier.

gryphon202 on October 21, 2009 at 11:30 AM

Heh. Beck just said she has been endorsed by the Daily Kos. I think he was serious. Can anyone confirm? Because you know … we can’t get any nwes from Fox anymore.

FerfeLaBat on October 21, 2009 at 11:30 AM

It is true. Newt endorsed Kos’ candidate. I’m trying to dig up a link.

gryphon202 on October 21, 2009 at 11:31 AM

A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers…and if there are those who cannot subscribe to these principles, then let them go their way. -Ronald Reagan

Apparently, the people at the NRCC and the RNC have forgotten these simple principles.

Besides, does anyone remember Arlen Specter, and how well he was received by liberals and Democrats (sarcasm mine)?

jehowe2nd on October 21, 2009 at 11:32 AM

But….bbbbut…. bbbbbuuuuttttt…big tent

/newt

SoxNation on October 21, 2009 at 11:35 AM

Ha! Beck caller saying she will no longer donate to the GOP. She will donate directly to conservative candidates.

Are you listening Michael Steele?

flyfisher on October 21, 2009 at 11:35 AM

Am I being unreasonable to expect the GOP to field candidates of like mind?

flyfisher on October 21, 2009 at 11:26 AM

You are out of luck as long as the party is controlled by people who consider McCain to be a conservative in synch with the base of the GOP.

I don’t want Republican candiates who promise they can work with Democrats in a bipartisan manner. I want Republican pitbulls who promise they will make Obama’s policies fail and bring down the tyranny of Pelosi/Reid.

highhopes on October 21, 2009 at 11:35 AM

I said that I noticed the RNC didn’t have as many contributions this last quarter as the dems. Hope that one comment stuck in his brain…

lovingmyUSA on October 21, 2009 at 11:18 AM

It seems most of the funds are going to canidates PACs directly by passing the RNC. It also seems a lot of the funds are going to SarahPAC. Steele has two strikes against him now and both are from NY.

Clyde5445 on October 21, 2009 at 11:36 AM

Steele has two strikes against him now and both are from NY.

Clyde5445 on October 21, 2009 at 11:36 AM

Absolutely. If we’re going to start floating third-way conservative candidates, local races like NY-23 are the way to do it. We can start working now, and ramp things up between now and 2012!

gryphon202 on October 21, 2009 at 11:38 AM

Newt/Jimmy Carter? Sadly, I can see that.

This race is a win for Conservatives. Janet Reno’s sister Dede probably can not win. That is a victory no matter which of the other two takes it.
Go Hoffman, I am literally almost giddy that Newt looks in so much trouble here. Apparently the RNC needs more than a wake up call and hopefully this is it.

ORconservative on October 21, 2009 at 11:39 AM

The third strike could be NJ. If so Steele better find a new line of work.

Clyde5445 on October 21, 2009 at 11:43 AM

Imagine if the grassroots candidate selected by the base takes this seat instead of the machine candidate selected by the elites….It could have national implications as party elites suddenly realize that the folk they find to run have to be acceptable to the folk who actually vote…

JIMV on October 21, 2009 at 11:43 AM

JIMV on October 21, 2009 at 11:43 AM

LOL, Funny and True.

Clyde5445 on October 21, 2009 at 11:45 AM

and they were going to lose the 2010 election if they kept this up. I also informed him I would not be contributing to the RNC. I said that I noticed the RNC didn’t have as many contributions this last quarter as the dems. Hope that one comment stuck in his brain…
lovingmyUSA on October 21, 2009 at 11:18 AM

PrincipledPilgrim on October 21, 2009 at 11:22 AM

I recently e-mailed the RNC and the NRSC and told them, no more money from me until you get rid of the RINOs and listen to your conservative voters. I told the NRSC to start reading the conservative blogs like HotAir to get a pulse on what their donors are thinking.

yoda on October 21, 2009 at 11:45 AM

it’s hard to imagine how they settled on this one.

Like Dole and McCain, it was “her turn”.

Crawford on October 21, 2009 at 11:45 AM

Scozzofava is the kind of very small ‘r’ Republican who could easily switch party affiliation without a second thought. She is a mere snowflake atop the tip of the iceberg of what is wrong w/ the state & national leadership for the Republican Party. Newt Gingrich can call it whatever he likes but it is not how Ronald Reagan attracted good people from the rank & file.

We now have to screen everything Newt Gingrich puts his approval stamp on because for him “Big Tent” includes those who favor BIG GOVT, ACORN, AGW [climate change], Abortion, Card Check, etc ….

Conservative Candidates should avoid Newt Gingrich. He is tainted besides being all over the political map.

Scozzofava will be forgotten soon but it is people like Newt Gingrich we need to watch now. If he endorses, you know something is wrong.

Good thing Gingrich didn’t want to be RNC chair or we’d really just be slightly worse off now. Michael Steele, hmm, well he’s not much better.

Americannodash on October 21, 2009 at 11:48 AM

This big tent defense is a load of BS. I’ll buy that for someone they wanna put up against Pelosi in her district. But to nominate someone like Scuzzy in NY-23 means either 1) they’re doing a terrible job vetting their candidates or 2) the GOP is run by a bunch of libs and Rockafeller-style Republicans who reject conservatism.

Doughboy on October 21, 2009 at 11:18 AM

Well it’s both…but good post.
Just one small disagreement…running a Pelosi “light” won’t win, they will not see a difference.
I believe you have to stick by your conservative values and run against someone like her. If you lose then she is forced to be a liberal hound and the public pays for it (like now). But a true conservative is a logical, thoughtful, caring, leader, and Pelosi would lose to a real leader…she will not lose to a liberal Republican.
Having this Scozzofava is proof to that, liberal Republicans have no core values. They have a foot on the dock and a foot in the boat…

right2bright on October 21, 2009 at 11:51 AM

Bill Crystal said on FOX that this lady’s campaign has called and raised he!! over articles that they didn’t like. He said he was standing a few feet away and could hear the caller. Not ever stable sounding.

Cindy Munford on October 21, 2009 at 11:52 AM

highhopes on October 21, 2009 at 11:35 AM

definitely with you there…

cmsinaz on October 21, 2009 at 11:52 AM

You left out an important bit, Ed: There’s audio!

In the audio recording of the reporter’s questioning played for The Associated Press by McCormack, the reporter didn’t raise his voice, but repeated his unanswered questions several times, including one about abortion.

Arrivederci, Dede.

Jim Treacher on October 21, 2009 at 11:52 AM

Bill Crystal Krystol said on FOX that this lady’s campaign has called and raised he!! over articles that they didn’t like. He said he was standing a few feet away and could hear the caller. Not ever stable sounding.

Cindy Munford on October 21, 2009 at 11:52 AM

That would be Matt Burns, the same one who accused McCormack of screaming. Classic lefty projection.

Jim Treacher on October 21, 2009 at 11:54 AM

Ha! Beck caller saying she will no longer donate to the GOP. She will donate directly to conservative candidates.

Are you listening Michael Steele?

flyfisher on October 21, 2009 at 11:35 AM

That caller is representing more and more of who is out there.
Basically that is how Obama got elected, not because he was a democrat, but because the swing voters really thought he was going to be different…that he was going to be transparent, change the dialog.
He got elected (by the swing voters) for being different from the parties…he wasn’t Hillary, or Kerry, or Edwards…of course they were wrong and he lied, and you can see the effect now.

right2bright on October 21, 2009 at 11:55 AM

Direct contributions are the way I’m going until the RNC gets its act together. This is the worst time in American history for the RNC to be in the shape it’s in.

flyfisher on October 21, 2009 at 11:30 AM

Exactly. This is the message the Tea Partiers were conveying and that the RNC refuses to hear. But, I’ll bet they can read a financial statement.

a capella on October 21, 2009 at 11:56 AM

Newt’s wrong again.

Quelle surprise!

Good, maybe we won’t have to see his smug mug on TV anymore.

What a maroon.

omnipotent on October 21, 2009 at 11:58 AM

Arrivederci, Dede.

Jim Treacher on October 21, 2009 at 11:52 AM

I wish, Jim. Ace has a great analysis of the Scozzafava problem, and the Republican chairs are looking more and more like @$$es every time they double down.

gryphon202 on October 21, 2009 at 12:02 PM

What is it about liberals (of both parties) and there aversion to telling the truth?

MarkTheGreat on October 21, 2009 at 12:03 PM

Jim Treacher on October 21, 2009 at 11:54 AM

Thanks I knew that was wrong when I typed it. Lazy shows. She needs to get rid of Mr. Burns, he’s not helpful.

Cindy Munford on October 21, 2009 at 12:03 PM

Is it too late for the Republican party to co-endorse Hoffman?

MarkTheGreat on October 21, 2009 at 12:04 PM

If the GOP is busy pushing candidates who are so left-wing that (1) their Democratic and Constitutional-Party opponents look better and (2) the Daily Kos is endorsing them, then it’s way past time to swear off voting for anyone you don’t know about just because they have an “R” after their name. You might just as well start voting for names with a “D” after them instead.

Aitch748 on October 21, 2009 at 12:05 PM

He will tell you it is up to the state parties and NRCC “doesn’t want to meddle”

PrincipledPilgrim on October 21, 2009 at 11:07 AM

Funny, they were eager to meddle in Florida, in order to support the RINO over the true conservative.

MarkTheGreat on October 21, 2009 at 12:06 PM

I wish, Jim. Ace has a great analysis of the Scozzafava problem, and the Republican chairs are looking more and more like @$$es every time they double down.

gryphon202 on October 21, 2009 at 12:02 PM

I don’t see anything there that says she can win now.

Jim Treacher on October 21, 2009 at 12:06 PM

Wow, the republicans look like petty children in the Ace article.
If they don’t change their tune, quick, I’ll be as likely to vote for an R as I am to vote for a D.

Not at all.

ORconservative on October 21, 2009 at 12:07 PM

FerfeLaBat on October 21, 2009 at 11:30 AM

I saw a link to Kos about her the other day–via CQ Politics.

NY-23: The most liberal candidate leads (and it’s not the Dem)
by kos

So it’s official, I’m rooting for the Republican to win. As a congresswoman, she could either move even more to the left to properly represent her progressive-trending district and be a pain in the side of the GOP caucus (they have nothing like our Blue Dogs), or Democrats can field a real Democrat to challenge her in 2010.

INC on October 21, 2009 at 12:07 PM

But they could’ve easily had a conservative “R” in this district. It’s a sure thing even in bad years for the GOP(which this is certainly not).

This was a bad year, or at least it was shaping up to be at the first of the year when they made their selection. Many of us here thought it would swing, maybe not as much as it has, but we thought there would be a backlash. The GOP is playing a different game than we are. They are just trying to get people with Rs beside their name in office, and we’re trying to get worthy candidates.

DFCtomm on October 21, 2009 at 12:07 PM

Newt you just lost me for good. Grinning with Princess Nancy,buddy buddy with Hil and now you back a RINO afraid of her own shadow. Whar’s next latte with Meghan McCain?
Great example as a Republican, why I refuse to send any money.

Jakefut on October 21, 2009 at 12:10 PM

the GOP is run by a bunch of libs and Rockafeller-style Republicans who reject conservatism.

Doughboy on October 21, 2009 at 11:18 AM

There’s a difference?

MarkTheGreat on October 21, 2009 at 12:11 PM

Is this the kind of candidate the republican party has been attracting lately. What is most amazing is how these people get through the party apparatus and manage to get their names on primary ballots and even get nominated for a particular position. What can we do to prevent this? Is it possible that liberals are infiltrating the Republican party? He tactics certainly samck as liberal/progressive to me.

kanda on October 21, 2009 at 12:12 PM

LOL

Jim Treacher on October 21, 2009 at 12:14 PM

Rush covering Hoffman on today’s show.

mudskipper on October 21, 2009 at 12:15 PM

Hoffman on Beck now.

marklmail on October 21, 2009 at 11:13 AM

We need the audio on this posted here ASAP.

Ed, AP, get on it!

Sapwolf on October 21, 2009 at 12:16 PM

Doughboy on October 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM

I am afraid I must disagree. If history tells us anything, the GOP “leadership” will learn absolutely nothing.

DrMagnolias on October 21, 2009 at 12:17 PM

Newt you just lost me for good. Grinning with Princess Nancy,buddy buddy with Hil and now you back a RINO afraid of her own shadow. Whar’s next latte with Meghan McCain?
Great example as a Republican, why I refuse to send any money.

Jakefut on October 21, 2009 at 12:10 PM

There is NO WAY Newt can recover whatever reputation he had left as a conservative.

He’s finised and let’s not even include him on any polls for 2012.

Ain’t. Gonna. Happen. Now.

Sapwolf on October 21, 2009 at 12:18 PM

Comment pages: 1 2