BuckeyeSam on October 20, 2009 at 4:00 PM

Don’t be so naive, they’ll still call it hyperbolic. If you suggest that maybe, possibly, there’s even the slightest chance that obama is spending too much money we don’t have, it will still be labeled hyperbolic. No dissent can be broached, this is totalitarianism we’re talking about.

Pro-business sentiment increasing.

Guess folks are realizing that:

1. Poor people/Libtards living in their parents’ attics don’t give them jobs.

2. The criminals in Washington are engaging in the hugest money grab in history and cannot create wealth, but rather only take it from others.

Poll: Economy more important than health care, climate combined
And note that this Public Strategies poll has a bit of skew in it as well towards Democrats in its sample.
Even with a ten-point gap for Democrats over Republicans, though,……

A few weeks ago, New York Times environmental blogger Andrew Revkin made a relatively straightforward observation, that “more children equal more carbon dioxide emissions.” Revkin went on to suggest that family planning and contraception might be an important part of any plan to limit CO2 emissions.

This is a covert attempt to promote population control world wide. It won’t work. It’s morally bankrupt. It’s wrong.

If Democrats keep pressing on big-spending plans of greater government intervention, they’re going to lose the next election, and lose it big.

I think they know this, and don’t care.

I also think it’s part of their grand plan to wreck the economy (Obamacare, Card Check, Cap-n-Trade, Stimuli 2 through 5) while cashing in their chips with the big money syndicates that gave them their power in the first place, surrender control of Congress to the GOP and go right back into “Blame The Republicans” mode.

All the self-righteous whining with none of the responsibilities associtated with leadership.

This is the problem. Obama doesn’t understand private-sector employment; I’m not sure that anyone in his administration does. Maybe they’ve played Monopoly or The Game of Life…but that’s it.

BuckeyeSam on October 20, 2009 at 4:00 PM

I may have to disagree a bit here. I think Obama and his buddies know exactly how jobs are created.

I’m pretty sure Obama said his main concern was that taxes should be ‘fair’ regardless of whether the taxes produced more revenue. I’ve tried to find the quote but haven’t yet.

The sooner people realize their true goal of Obama and the left, the sooner we’ll be able to put a stop to this insanity. I believe the American People will wake up, but I hope we all wake up in time.

It’s easy to be all hopey-changey and caring for Mother Earth when you have a job, or when your parents are paying your bills. Of course, that nonsense hits the fan when reality punches your in the face with a layoff.

62 percent of those polled agreed that “economic growth should be given priority, even if the environment suffers to some extent.”

Only 62 percent? This is really, really sad.

If Democrats keep pressing on big-spending plans of greater government intervention, they’re going to lose the next election, and lose it big.

Not if the RNC has anything to do with it–they are adapt at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory….

f Democrats keep pressing on big-spending plans of greater government intervention, they’re going to lose the next election, and lose it big.

If there is a next election this would probably hold true. A lot can happen in the next 12 months.

Business=jobs. It is not complicated.

Terrye on October 20, 2009 at 3:10 PM

This is the problem. Obama doesn’t understand private-sector employment; I’m not sure that anyone in his administration does. Maybe they’ve played Monopoly or The Game of Life…but that’s it.

I’m not a birther. But I do think that there’s something foreign about Obama’s take on our economic system. Riddled as it is with government intervention, in spots, it still resembles a free market.

I suggest that we stop with the labels of marxist, communist, and socialist because they give Obama the opening to dismiss them as hyperbolic. I suggest that someone come up with a negative, but punchy characterization for Obama’s economic policies that will resonate with Americans.

My first shot is Obama is anti-private sector.

Yeah, you’re right, except it seems so incredibly simple. Here is Oregon the libs have gone crazy looking for stuff to tax. Absolutely crazy but it is the same problem. They are spending money they are anticipating getting. It’s done MI so much good that the governor is now holding the kids hostage. It’s worked before but eventually people are going to figure out that they do not really need public ed. anymore than they need soda or cigs.

Why would 54% of the public trust Obama. What the F**k is wrong with these people that they can’t see the filthy rat bastard traitor and lying coward for what he is? What is there to trust about this evil creature?

highhopes on October 20, 2009 at 3:07 PM

Higher Education?

Most thieves are non-partisan.

The Calibur on October 20, 2009 at 3:00 PM

History disputes your claim.

By far, most thieves are Democrats.

It’s the economy stupid. You can’t raise taxes when you’ve run out of people and things to tax.

ORconservative on October 20, 2009 at 3:25 PM

That is the one simple economic truth that libtards will never, EVER comprehend. Reminds me of Margaret Thatcher’s quote, “The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.”

NoDonkey on October 20, 2009 at 3:40 PM

Yeah, isn’t it funny how the only part of the economy which is growing is Government spending… and at a time when Tax revenue is DECREASING?