<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White House: We won&#8217;t demand a public option</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:19:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hard Starboard</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2851073</link>
		<dc:creator>Hard Starboard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2851073</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Health Wars (10/19/09)...&lt;/strong&gt;

The ObamaHouse now says that the Li&#039;l President will accept a&#160;BarryCare bill without a public option.&#160; Which is precisely what the ObamaHouse said six weeks ago prior to the Li&#039;l President&#039;s &quot;last ditch/hail mary/all on one final roll of ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Health Wars (10/19/09)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The ObamaHouse now says that the Li&#8217;l President will accept a&nbsp;BarryCare bill without a public option.&nbsp; Which is precisely what the ObamaHouse said six weeks ago prior to the Li&#8217;l President&#8217;s &#8220;last ditch/hail mary/all on one final roll of &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Snooper Report</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2850878</link>
		<dc:creator>The Snooper Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 04:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2850878</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Remember When Czarboe Said That Congressional Health Care Was Going To Be For EVERYBODY?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Well, go figure.&#160; It just isn&#039;t so.&#160; Oh.&#160; Wait.&#160; That was a campaign &quot;promise&quot; and we all know what Czarbie says about &quot;campaign songs and dances&quot;.&amp; ......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Remember When Czarboe Said That Congressional Health Care Was Going To Be For EVERYBODY?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Well, go figure.&nbsp; It just isn&#8217;t so.&nbsp; Oh.&nbsp; Wait.&nbsp; That was a campaign &#8220;promise&#8221; and we all know what Czarbie says about &#8220;campaign songs and dances&#8221;.&amp; &#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ckoeber</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2850802</link>
		<dc:creator>ckoeber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 03:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2850802</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Is this leadership?  It’s a passive-aggressive approach that leaves both progressives and moderates in Obama’s own party twisting in the wind.  Obama wants his advisers to take all of the flak from progressive action groups that will result from a retreat on government-run health insurance, but doesn’t have the stomach to take that hit himself.  The end result is confusion among legislators on Capitol Hill, and further entrenchment on either side of the issue.

It’s the executive version of voting “present”.  The debate on health-care reform has gone on for over five months now.  Can the President be bothered to take a public position himself, or does he need to keep eating his waffle for a few more weeks?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Like it or not he has made progress with this position, even getting a RINO down.

He is forcing Congress and the progressives to step up. Remember that ANY press is generally good in politics!

Notice that the public option has never really died? It&#039;s do to this strategy. Progressives will keep screaming and that&#039;ll keep the proposal in play.

Politically intelligent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Is this leadership?  It’s a passive-aggressive approach that leaves both progressives and moderates in Obama’s own party twisting in the wind.  Obama wants his advisers to take all of the flak from progressive action groups that will result from a retreat on government-run health insurance, but doesn’t have the stomach to take that hit himself.  The end result is confusion among legislators on Capitol Hill, and further entrenchment on either side of the issue.</p>
<p>It’s the executive version of voting “present”.  The debate on health-care reform has gone on for over five months now.  Can the President be bothered to take a public position himself, or does he need to keep eating his waffle for a few more weeks?</p></blockquote>
<p>Like it or not he has made progress with this position, even getting a RINO down.</p>
<p>He is forcing Congress and the progressives to step up. Remember that ANY press is generally good in politics!</p>
<p>Notice that the public option has never really died? It&#8217;s do to this strategy. Progressives will keep screaming and that&#8217;ll keep the proposal in play.</p>
<p>Politically intelligent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wepeople</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2850460</link>
		<dc:creator>wepeople</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2850460</guid>
		<description>Waffle...Mao Obama waffle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waffle&#8230;Mao Obama waffle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrannyDee</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2849293</link>
		<dc:creator>GrannyDee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2849293</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Well, Obama had an opportunity to send that message himself six weeks ago in front of a joint session of Congress.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s only been six weeks since Der Leader appeared before a joint session of Congress?

Feels more like a lifetime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Well, Obama had an opportunity to send that message himself six weeks ago in front of a joint session of Congress.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s only been six weeks since Der Leader appeared before a joint session of Congress?</p>
<p>Feels more like a lifetime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ya2daup</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2849108</link>
		<dc:creator>ya2daup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2849108</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Do you accept FHA Loans?

WashJeff on October 19, 2009 at 11:59 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sure, why not? 

If Bawney Fwank can &quot;roll the dice a little bit more in this situation towards subsidized housing&quot;, why shouldn&#039;t we? It&#039;s our dime after all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Do you accept FHA Loans?</p>
<p>WashJeff on October 19, 2009 at 11:59 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Sure, why not? </p>
<p>If Bawney Fwank can &#8220;roll the dice a little bit more in this situation towards subsidized housing&#8221;, why shouldn&#8217;t we? It&#8217;s our dime after all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niteowl45</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2848339</link>
		<dc:creator>Niteowl45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2848339</guid>
		<description>Notice 2 things:

“He thinks it’s the best possible choice.”
“he is not demanding that it is in&quot;

Notice: he has taken a stand on BOTH sides of the issue. this tells you he won&#039;t back ANYTHING unless he knows for certain ahead of time that it will succeed. The equivelant of voting present. It also tells you he plans to lay blame elsewhere by not taking a stand on one way or the other. 

It&#039;s not lost that he has backed BOTH sides of the issue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice 2 things:</p>
<p>“He thinks it’s the best possible choice.”<br />
“he is not demanding that it is in&#8221;</p>
<p>Notice: he has taken a stand on BOTH sides of the issue. this tells you he won&#8217;t back ANYTHING unless he knows for certain ahead of time that it will succeed. The equivelant of voting present. It also tells you he plans to lay blame elsewhere by not taking a stand on one way or the other. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not lost that he has backed BOTH sides of the issue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GarandFan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2848244</link>
		<dc:creator>GarandFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2848244</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;Leadership&quot; from Barry?  Hahahahahahahaa!!!&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>&#8220;Leadership&#8221; from Barry?  Hahahahahahahaa!!!</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkTheGreat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2848189</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkTheGreat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2848189</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;They will insert the public option into the bill at a later date. Nothing is as it seems in Washington, expcept for the corruption.

bloggless on October 19, 2009 at 12:51 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Even the corruption is usually bigger than it seems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>They will insert the public option into the bill at a later date. Nothing is as it seems in Washington, expcept for the corruption.</p>
<p>bloggless on October 19, 2009 at 12:51 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Even the corruption is usually bigger than it seems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peterargus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2848029</link>
		<dc:creator>peterargus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2848029</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s the executive version of voting “present”.  The debate on _________ has gone on for over _____ now.  Can the President be bothered to take a public position himself, or does he need to keep eating his waffle for a few more weeks?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You can fill in blanks with preferred topic and time of vacillation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It’s the executive version of voting “present”.  The debate on _________ has gone on for over _____ now.  Can the President be bothered to take a public position himself, or does he need to keep eating his waffle for a few more weeks?</p></blockquote>
<p>You can fill in blanks with preferred topic and time of vacillation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UltimateBob</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2848019</link>
		<dc:creator>UltimateBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2848019</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why &lt;strong&gt;destroy to fix&lt;/strong&gt;, makes no sense does it.

tarpon on October 19, 2009 at 11:00 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Isn&#039;t that what Cash for Clunkers was all about?  Give us your perfectly good car, we&#039;ll destroy it by pouring chemicals into it so it&#039;ll never run again, then go out and buy a new car, and we&#039;ll give you $4500. (which by the way, you&#039;ll have to pay taxes on).

And we all know what a HUGE success that was.  So why do you think it won&#039;t work with an industry that represents 1/5 of the nation&#039;s economy?

[big eyeroll]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why <strong>destroy to fix</strong>, makes no sense does it.</p>
<p>tarpon on October 19, 2009 at 11:00 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Isn&#8217;t that what Cash for Clunkers was all about?  Give us your perfectly good car, we&#8217;ll destroy it by pouring chemicals into it so it&#8217;ll never run again, then go out and buy a new car, and we&#8217;ll give you $4500. (which by the way, you&#8217;ll have to pay taxes on).</p>
<p>And we all know what a HUGE success that was.  So why do you think it won&#8217;t work with an industry that represents 1/5 of the nation&#8217;s economy?</p>
<p>[big eyeroll]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UltimateBob</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2848002</link>
		<dc:creator>UltimateBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2848002</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;White House: We won’t demand a public option&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;Trust me.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

-- Barack Hussein Obama (mmmm mmm mm)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>White House: We won’t demand a public option</p></blockquote>
<p><strong><em>&#8220;Trust me.&#8221;</em></strong></p>
<p>&#8211; Barack Hussein Obama (mmmm mmm mm)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DerKrieger</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2847987</link>
		<dc:creator>DerKrieger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2847987</guid>
		<description>Go ahead and demand it JA. I hope someone then brings you up on charges to impeach you for violating your oath to protect the Constitution. There is NO Constitutional authority for federal involvement in health care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go ahead and demand it JA. I hope someone then brings you up on charges to impeach you for violating your oath to protect the Constitution. There is NO Constitutional authority for federal involvement in health care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyx</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2847982</link>
		<dc:creator>nyx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2847982</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

oldernwiser on October 19, 2009 at 11:49 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

He reminds me of Gatsby
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&quot;The truth was that Jay Gatsby, of West Egg, Long Island, sprang from &lt;strong&gt;his Platonic conception of himself.&lt;/strong&gt; He was a son of God-a phrase which, if it means anything, means just that-and he must be about His Father&#039;s business, the service of a vast, vulgar, and meretricious beauty. So he invented just the sort of Jay Gatsby &lt;strong&gt;that a seventeen year old boy would be likely to invent, and to this conception he was faithful to the end.&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;
The Great Gatsby
Chapter 6.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>oldernwiser on October 19, 2009 at 11:49 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>He reminds me of Gatsby</p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8220;The truth was that Jay Gatsby, of West Egg, Long Island, sprang from <strong>his Platonic conception of himself.</strong> He was a son of God-a phrase which, if it means anything, means just that-and he must be about His Father&#8217;s business, the service of a vast, vulgar, and meretricious beauty. So he invented just the sort of Jay Gatsby <strong>that a seventeen year old boy would be likely to invent, and to this conception he was faithful to the end.</strong>&#8221;<br />
The Great Gatsby<br />
Chapter 6.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking for More &#8211; Blog Watch</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2847933</link>
		<dc:creator>Looking for More &#8211; Blog Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2847933</guid>
		<description>[...] the public option is still breathing, but according to Hot Air&#8217;s Ed Morrissey, not because of much help from President Obama: &#8220;Is this leadership?  It’s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the public option is still breathing, but according to Hot Air&#8217;s Ed Morrissey, not because of much help from President Obama: &#8220;Is this leadership?  It’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bloggless</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2847921</link>
		<dc:creator>bloggless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2847921</guid>
		<description>They will insert the public option into the bill at a later date.  Nothing is as it seems in Washington, expcept for the corruption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They will insert the public option into the bill at a later date.  Nothing is as it seems in Washington, expcept for the corruption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juno77</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2847918</link>
		<dc:creator>Juno77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2847918</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t believe anything the Messiah says, even when he reads it off the teleprompter.

n0doz on October 19, 2009 at 12:35 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;d believe it if he said “I resign”  - well okay, only when he bumps his head on the door frame of Marine One on the way out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I don’t believe anything the Messiah says, even when he reads it off the teleprompter.</p>
<p>n0doz on October 19, 2009 at 12:35 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d believe it if he said “I resign”  &#8211; well okay, only when he bumps his head on the door frame of Marine One on the way out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n0doz</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2847879</link>
		<dc:creator>n0doz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2847879</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe anything the Messiah says, even when he reads it off the teleprompter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe anything the Messiah says, even when he reads it off the teleprompter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rebuzz</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2847830</link>
		<dc:creator>rebuzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2847830</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The only way to make sure there is no public option is to dump these bills now and the Dems in 2010.

Dusty on October 19, 2009 at 12:07 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s too late! Everything will already be in place, comrade!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The only way to make sure there is no public option is to dump these bills now and the Dems in 2010.</p>
<p>Dusty on October 19, 2009 at 12:07 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s too late! Everything will already be in place, comrade!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rrpjr</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2847821</link>
		<dc:creator>rrpjr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2847821</guid>
		<description>No, we won&#039;t demand a public option. We have a much better idea. We&#039;ll just destroy the private health insurance business according to our usual leftist scheme of perverse incentives, structural time bombs and the time-tested techniques of covert and untraceable anti-capitalist sabotage. Then we&#039;ll ride in to save the day with a government plan. Why we didn&#039;t think of this from the beginning, one can only wonder. How could we have been so foolish to throw out an actual plan for debate which exposed our hidden agenda for takeover when we could have just rigged the system this way from the beginning! Live and learn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, we won&#8217;t demand a public option. We have a much better idea. We&#8217;ll just destroy the private health insurance business according to our usual leftist scheme of perverse incentives, structural time bombs and the time-tested techniques of covert and untraceable anti-capitalist sabotage. Then we&#8217;ll ride in to save the day with a government plan. Why we didn&#8217;t think of this from the beginning, one can only wonder. How could we have been so foolish to throw out an actual plan for debate which exposed our hidden agenda for takeover when we could have just rigged the system this way from the beginning! Live and learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dusty</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2847817</link>
		<dc:creator>Dusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2847817</guid>
		<description>The only way to make sure there is no public option is to dump these bills now and the Dems in 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only way to make sure there is no public option is to dump these bills now and the Dems in 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alana</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2847816</link>
		<dc:creator>Alana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2847816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see why he would care if it has the public option in it right now, because the legislation will destroy private insurance anyway.

Then there&#039;s always time to &quot;fix&quot; that, by creating a public option as the solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see why he would care if it has the public option in it right now, because the legislation will destroy private insurance anyway.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s always time to &#8220;fix&#8221; that, by creating a public option as the solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WashJeff</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2847799</link>
		<dc:creator>WashJeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2847799</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Can I interest you in buying some prime &lt;strike&gt;swampland&lt;/strike&gt;?

ya2daup on October 19, 2009 at 11:54 AM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Do you accept FHA Loans?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Can I interest you in buying some prime <strike>swampland</strike>?</p>
<p>ya2daup on October 19, 2009 at 11:54 AM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Do you accept FHA Loans?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baxter Greene</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2847797</link>
		<dc:creator>Baxter Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2847797</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
We all know 0ero wants the public option in the final bill. I think he’s going to wait for the nuclear option for the dems to put it back in

rockmom on October 19, 2009 at 11:29 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

 That&#039;s right,get a Health care bill agreed on,ride the wave of adoration from the press and pundits right into having to &quot;add&quot; a few things here and there that will be spun or defended by the press,hidden from a majority of the public,but implemented just the same.

 Remember...the expiration date on &quot;transparency&quot; and &quot;accountability&quot; ran out back in February.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
We all know 0ero wants the public option in the final bill. I think he’s going to wait for the nuclear option for the dems to put it back in</p>
<p>rockmom on October 19, 2009 at 11:29 AM</p></blockquote>
<p> That&#8217;s right,get a Health care bill agreed on,ride the wave of adoration from the press and pundits right into having to &#8220;add&#8221; a few things here and there that will be spun or defended by the press,hidden from a majority of the public,but implemented just the same.</p>
<p> Remember&#8230;the expiration date on &#8220;transparency&#8221; and &#8220;accountability&#8221; ran out back in February.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marklmail</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/19/white-house-we-wont-demand-a-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2847794</link>
		<dc:creator>marklmail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69568#comment-2847794</guid>
		<description>Conniving Axelrod, Emanuel and Obama HAVE to have a nuke plan to remain in power, because Obama to this point has been a complete disaster. The middle and right have RUN away from this freak. It&#039;ll be interesting to see how what they&#039;re doing will fit into their master plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conniving Axelrod, Emanuel and Obama HAVE to have a nuke plan to remain in power, because Obama to this point has been a complete disaster. The middle and right have RUN away from this freak. It&#8217;ll be interesting to see how what they&#8217;re doing will fit into their master plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
