Comments on: WCPAC interview with Rep. Dana Rohrabacher

By: TheAlamos

TheAlamos — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:19:58 +0000

Thanks Ed. Now we know him well.

HE’S MORE WRONG THAN RIGHT.

In general, DANA MUST BE REPLACED SOON.

By: jaime

jaime — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:53:24 +0000

Good interview, Ed. Thanks for getting it for us.

By: Gob

Gob — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:52:07 +0000

I think the Lord Monckton speech is important! Should be thread for that!

http://www.rightsidenews.com/200910176878/energy-and-environment/what-lord-monckton-said-at-dinner.html

(Michael Medved always said not to believe the NWO but this scares me…)

By: joe_doufu

joe_doufu — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:48:48 +0000

I met him last fall as a volunteer knocking on doors for his re-election. He’s a USC alumnus, like me, and a conservative (of a sort) in the middle of southern California. I’ll take what I can get.

By: sesquipedalian

sesquipedalian — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:41:23 +0000

hey ed, why didn't you ask the good dana about the taliban? (or abramoff?) this dude is one of the looniest congressmen.

The potential rise to power of the Taliban does not alarm Rohrabacher, because the Taliban could provide stability in an area where chaos was creating a real threat to the U.S. Rohrabacher calls the sensational media reporting of the “harsh” imposition of strict Islamic behavior, with the underlying implication that this somehow threatens the West, “nonsense.” He says the Taliban are devout traditionalists, not terrorists or revolutionaries, and, in contrast to the Iranians, they do not seem intent on exporting their beliefs. Rohrabacher would have preferred to see a negotiated compromise among the various factions (but with no role for Gulbuddin Hekmatyar) rather than a bloody confrontation. But in the absence of such a compromise, he believes a Taliban takeover would be a positive development.

By: Terrie

Terrie — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:37:52 +0000

That’s my special ~~boy~~ congressman. By special, I mean he has a short attention span, constantly gets distracted by something shiny and needs lots of supervision.

Uhm Dana is going crazy lately.

Apologetic California on October 19, 2009 at 2:30 PM

He’s always been crazy. It’s an Orange County tradition to send at least one loose cannon conservative to Washington (see Dornan, Bob). On his looniest day, he is so much better than Bunny Sanchez.

By: Tim Burton

Tim Burton — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:32:53 +0000

Did he threaten you, call you an @$$hole, and kick you out?

By: GarandFan

GarandFan — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:32:33 +0000

Dana, to put it politely, is a putz. Just like Barry, great on talk. Short on action.

By: Apologetic California

Apologetic California — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:30:11 +0000

Uhm Dana is going crazy lately. He voted against censuring Rangel, and the LAT today has him in the same boat as leftard supremacist Barbara Lee in being against more troops in Afghanistan.

By: LASue

LASue — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:26:40 +0000

Dana is about the only bright spot conservatives have in Southern California. I walked the precinct for him last election and look forward to doing so again.