How This Reluctant Whistleblower Decided to Tell All

posted at 10:35 am on October 17, 2009 by Anita MonCrief

In May of 2008 I was working at a respected non-profit and learning the ropes of the corporate nonprofit world. At ACORN you never knew what you would find. I once walked into a lobby and saw a man on his knees talking to DC local ACORN about the “man” and something about Bush. My new position was defiantly not grassroots. Everything was efficient, clean and well run. I was making a nice salary and loved the mission of the nonprofit. I had been there a few months and the only problem was that I felt that I was in the wrong place. As primaries raged on I felt a disquieting sense of something passing me by. At the time I was trying to reconcile myself with my choices in life but a part of me was still living in fear of who I had been and who I really was.

That May I decided to go back to my grassroots background and experience this monumental change that everyone predicted was on the horizon. I started out as a Hillary Clinton supporter as I have mentioned in radio interviews. I wanted to really delve into the feeling that seemed to permeate through the liberal community as the 2008 presidential election approached. Everyone sensed that we were on the cusp of something life changing. It became harder and harder for me to sit by, so I joined another grassroots, progressive organization with labor roots. I was sitting at my desk one July day I when got the email alert about the ACORN embezzlement scandal. I followed a myriad of nonprofit dailies and was surprised but not shocked to see the story. ACORN had tons of stories like these floating around, it was part of ACORN lore.

ACORN DC OFFICE 9-13

I often wonder if I would have contacted New York Times reporter Stephanie Strom if I had stayed at my previous post with the international nonprofit, but somehow I think that making the choice to leave made this one easier. I was a union member with great benefits, a salary in the mid-forties and what I felt was a front row seat to change. I debated with myself about contacting the reporter who wrote the story. Part of me wanted to let sleeping dogs lie and not talk about what I knew about ACORN. I remembered doing the research on voter fraud allegations from 2004 and knew what happened to ACORN employees who decided to speak out, and I felt that I would definitely be retaliated against and labeled disgruntled. I weighed all of these options and decided that if I stayed quiet that it would be for selfish reasons, and that is not why I came to DC.

rotten_acorn_ad

Still, I asked myself “why throw away a promising future and speak out against ACORN?” But the part of me that came back to grassroots to help people knew that I had to finish what I had started in 2007 when I contacted the makers of the Rotten ACORN website, the Employment Policies Institute, because I had become disillusioned with ACORN and no longer wanted to turn a blind eye to what I had seen. At the time I had a baby who was less than a year old and had been born premature at 2lbs 2 ounces. I made that call in hushed tones without identifying myself, and the staffer to whom I spoke expressed concern over my personal situation. Instead of trying to use me to attack ACORN immediately and “mine me” for information, he advised me to seek other employment first and then call back. After a great deal of thought, I decided to contact Stephanie Strom at the New York Times using an alias. Stephanie responded immediately and we began a collaboration that would span a number of months. I came to trust her and told her my name.

In August of 2008, Marcel Reid, a board member who was selected to sit on the national board of ACORN and the president of the Local DC ACORN board, somehow learned that I was working with the NYT and got in touch with me. I began passing information and messages from Marcel to Stephanie. I emailed Stephanie at the time that it appeared that “…Wade [Rathke] is refusing to fully hand over the reigns there has even been talk of jail time. I think she may want to throw a few more nails in the coffin to ensure her leadership and direction are taken seriously.“

Some women who grew up in similar situations have “daddy issues” but I had resolved my feeling toward my father about five years after he died. I had “mommy issues” that led me to look to Marcel for guidance, reassurance and at times validation. To me she was an older black female who really seemed to care and to understand how hard this was turning out to be. I remembered her from my days at ACORN and she always struck me as authoritative and in control. I look back and see the perfect storm of coincidences that led to this relationship. My mother was working in Japan, my health had taken a near deadly turn and issues at work (I briefly described these in my testimony in PA) coupled with a speedy move to a place where ACORN could not find me, led me to look to Marcel for inspiration and advice.

Stephanie Strom and Marcel would eventually connect directly. By then I found myself moving away from trusting Stephanie or the Times. Several articles had appeared that seemed to be extremely watered down and almost PR pieces for ACORN. The running theme was to blame founder Wade Rathke and to extol the new ACORN leadership. While the Obama camp will not admit it, the campaign and his whole presidency has been about race (a trusty divisive technique) and I went against the inherent need as a black person to “stick together” and overcame my political instincts as a liberal and confirmed what Michelle Malkin has already uncovered about ACORN and Obama. Stephanie seemed hot on the trail of this story but as election day got closer and the stories weaker and weaker, I decided that I needed a back up plan and emailed Michael Gaynor and Michelle Malkin.

I had never heard of Gaynor but his writing on ACORN back in late September and early October of 2008 led me to believe that he, like Michelle, understood what was going on. Gaynor emailed back, Michelle did not. He became my backup plan after I agreed to identify myself to him so that he could check me out. In addition to being a confidential source of Stephanie, I became a confidential source of Gaynor.

Later in October of 2008 Stephanie told me that it would be better if she could identify me for this ACORN/Obama story. I preferred to be a confidential source, but reluctantly agreed to come forward. As of September 2008, I was no longer working for my union affiliated organization and a part of me felt that I had let my family down. I talked to my fiance, who was having a rough year because of me, and he agreed to support me no matter what. That was very important to me because I was never one of those people who lived the perfect life and being under a microscope would be hard for everyone. I was tired of living in fear, fear of the person I used to be, fear of other people, fear of ACORN and fear of what I was supposed to do.

With my mom in Japan with minimal phone contact with me, I leaned on Marcel and asked for advice when the New York Times decided to make Stephanie “stand down” and killed the ACORN/Obama story. I called Marcel after listening to the voice mail that Stephanie had left for me and then talking to Stephanie about what had happened and why. I told Marcel about Stephanie’s game-changer comment and she told me about a lawsuit brought in Pennsylvania by attorney Heather Heidelbaugh against ACORN and gave me the number to contact her.

I also contacted Gaynor that same day. He encouraged me to work with Heather and asked if he could write about it immediately, and write about it he did! See ACORN WHISTLEBLOWER: OBAMA’S THIRD STRIKE? (October 22, 2008). I was not expecting such detail but I had agreed to come forward and he had said he would do what he could to draw public attention to the whole truth about ACORN, including its Obama and Obama campaign connections.

After our conversation regarding her case, Heidelbaugh came to DC to interview me the next day and I immediately knew that I could work with her. She was smart, funny and comforting, and as I got to see her in action, I was awed by her legal skills. The night before I was to testify, I talked to Marcel and she told me that Karyn Gillette, my former mentor, would be there. This was a big blow to me, as I credit Karyn with helping me regain my confidence after working with ACORN/Project Vote for so long. Karyn really listened to me, she was not a “DC insider” and I loved her unapologetic take on life. Of all the people there for ACORN, she was the one that seeing was the hardest thing for me. I knew that I had to tell the truth, but I still didn’t want her to ever think that by telling it, I was rebuking her or what she had taught me. I learned another lesson from her that day when I was told that she never came back after the break to testify against me.

Fullscreen capture 10162009 122433 PM

After my testimony in the Pennsylvania ACORN case (transcript available here), the Wall Street Journal article about it and an interview by Laura Ingraham on her radio show, I was invited by Fox News to come to New York and be on TV the weekend before election day. I talked to Marcel and Gaynor at length about this. I was afraid to appear on TV or become the black woman who tried to take down Obama. I would stay up all night and watch over my family. They had never signed up for this and there we were, hiding out, not knowing what would come next. I saw how Joe the Plumber was treated just for asking Obama a question and here I was , about to tell the world that the Obama campaign had given ACORN/Project Vote his donor list.

Former friends seemed to want to do physical harm to me and I was afraid to leave the house. Gaynor has always been an advocate for the full truth getting out there and tried to help me overcome my fear. I had been interviewed by Laura Ingraham and was surprised by how much I like her and begun to wonder if Fox News was really as evil as the left portrayed it. Granted, my only experience with Fox was from NewsHounds, a site whose slogan is “We watch Fox, so you don’t have to.” I was advised by an ACORN insider that Fox would use me and that it would be a hatchet job interview set up to make me the poster child for a last minute anti-Obama push. Being a liberal I believed this and tried CNN and ABC instead of Fox to get a “fair” story out but they were too busy covering for Obama.

obama1

If there is one thing that I learned during my time with ACORN, it is that they have friends in the media. I grew tired with the one-sided reporting that seemed to crop up every time ACORN’s name was mentioned. I started my own blog in response to the biased coverage on ACORN. My first few posts were hard for me as I felt like I had lost my voice for a number of years and it was kind of “raspy” as it came back to me. At ACORN I felt out of place and very cautious, as if I were walking on ground with land mines buried beneath it, and this led me to seek approval before posting. I would send Marcel copies of my posts before posting, knowing that she would tell me whether they were horrible or not. At times I would add in favorable mentions of her ACORN 8 as she requested or change language related to President Obama.

Throughout most of the winter my relationship with Marcel grew and I began to depend on this friendship to keep me focused when everything seemed so bleak. There were a few times when I wondered if we were really making a difference and questioned my judgment for taking my family down this road. I felt a glimmer of hope in February of 2009 when at Marcel’s request, I went to a meeting with the House Committee on Government Oversight and Reform. Marcel and I had spent the day taking copies of the ACORN 8′s RICO complaint against ACORN to members of Congress. Not a month later, Marcel and I attended a Congressional hearing at which Heather Heidelbaugh testified about my experience with the New York Times and my testimony in her Pennsylvania ACORN case. See the transcript here.

I began to see progress but at the same time, I felt that I was holding back. Since I was coordinating with Marcel, I listened to her on matters like exposing the bias at the New York Times. Often she would tell me that it was “not our fight” or convince me that it would distract from the goal at hand.

A part of me wanted to believe her and also protect Stephanie, someone whom I felt had tried to do her job as a reporter. However, eventually I started to gain strength and listen to my inner voice, the one that was telling me that covering up for people was the same thing as lying. As I began to drift from Marcel and the ACORN 8, I headed towards the conservative path as my thinking clarified. The first step was overcoming my fear; I had to learn to accept responsibility for whatever arose as a result of it and to be at peace with that. I was tired of being afraid and tired of running from myself, so I broke free and began to connect the dots between ACORN, the Democrats and Obama. The more that I exposed, the less afraid I became.

Exposing the New York Times spiked ACORN/Obama story was not something that I took lightly, and I think Marcel was one of the reasons I did it. I remember her telling me that I was “all right” because I was focused with her on the ACORN 8 complaint and that she knew from friends that “Obama was not worried about what I was doing.” Instead of comforting me, this troubled me because I had begun to see Obama as someone who was steadily making payoffs to his labor buddies like Andy Stern president of SEIU. I looked at his picks for Labor Secretary and Health and Human Services Secretary and knew that Hilda Solis and Kathleen Sebelius were put in place to help pass obvious labor enriching legislation. Exposing the media bias also exposed Obama and ACORN as a something so newsworthy that it had to be covered up. For me it was the beginning of a journey that was not meant to be easy or to lead to a happily ever after ending.

waters-1

The more I spoke about Obama and the Democrats part in the ACORN scandal, the more I drifted away from the ACORN 8. I never thought that their mission was bad, but ACORN’s subversive nature is rooted in pay for play politics and if one is to clean house, it has to be across the board. I was proud when Marcel appeared on Glenn Beck but often dismayed at the picture she painted of ACORN. Yes, the members are great people, but they do not need an ACORN to help them. Local based initiatives run by people in their own communities seem to do more to really help the poor. As more ACORN corruption was exposed, it became evident that reform was really not an option, it was a band aid on the Titanic. By breaking free of someone else’s agenda and doing the right thing, I was able to take this story to another level by doing research and exposing even more corruption.

I used to think that my life would be one that would repeat a cycle of despair but I discovered that I was meant to do this. Living through a series of events beginning with me trying to forge my way without guidance and continuing to where I am now is nothing short of a miracle. Two years ago, if someone had told me my life would take this turn, I would have laughed hysterically, but along the way I learned that by exposing the truth about ACORN and the Democrats that I had a chance to really help the poor in a way that would really make a difference.

This post was promoted from GreenRoom to HotAir.com.
To see the comments on the original post, look here.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

What’s going to happen when you find out conservatives and their groups are also just as corrupt? What ideology will you run to then?

You had your 15 minutes of fame Anita, now go away!

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 10:45 AM

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 10:45 AM

a**hole alert…

Very well written piece Anita. So glad you’re with us and sharing your story. I’d ask the A-hole Norman for back-up on his claims, but why bother.

Keemo on October 17, 2009 at 10:50 AM

but along the way I learned that by exposing the truth about ACORN and the Democrats that I had a chance to really help the poor in a way that would really make a difference.

Miss Moncrief, you made a difference and God bless you for it.

fourdeucer on October 17, 2009 at 10:52 AM

those involved should be admonished and dealt with the same. no excuse for bad behavior. Let the Mopping begin…starting with the VA,NJ Gov. race.

hawkman on October 17, 2009 at 10:53 AM

Thank you very much for you actions Anita. I can’t imagine how hard it has been for you.

It takes a great person to stand up for what is right, and to maintain that stance under pressure.

I’m afraid that you will soon receive more vitriol from the resident trolls, but disregard that in recognition of the source.

The truth is an absolute defence, but it can be a bitter pill to swallow.

NavyspyII on October 17, 2009 at 10:53 AM

Hero.

outerwear on October 17, 2009 at 10:54 AM

BTW: Whomever made the decision to put this article on the front page; I thank you. This woman is an excellent addition to the GR and is deserving of front page status.

Keemo on October 17, 2009 at 10:54 AM

Well said Anita!

Don’t listen to all of the vitriol regarding your exposure of the corruption….the truth is the TRUTH, regardless of ideology or party affiliation.

Best wishes!

A voice of reason on October 17, 2009 at 10:55 AM

What marvelous courage you have, Anita. Your follow-through on your convictions is a blessing to us all.

onlineanalyst on October 17, 2009 at 10:55 AM

What’s going to happen when you find out conservatives and their groups are also just as corrupt? What ideology will you run to then?

You had your 15 minutes of fame Anita, now go away!

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 10:45 AM

The above viewpoint is not that of the management, nor of most people commenting here.

Mr. Blizter, you are accusing conservatives and their apparatus as being as corrupt as ACORN. Please show us an example of a corrupt conservative organization which is sipping from the public till in the same fashion as ACORN?

In fact, I’ll even make your job easier. Just show an example of a corrupt conservative organization which is not sipping from the public till.

That ought to be easy. You have 10 minutes. Begin.

unclesmrgol on October 17, 2009 at 10:55 AM

Thanks for sharing your story, Anita. And you are spot-on about the importance of local-based initiatives.

Mr. D on October 17, 2009 at 10:57 AM

What’s going to happen when you find out conservatives and their groups are also just as corrupt? What ideology will you run to then?

You had your 15 minutes of fame Anita, now go away!

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 10:45 AM

Corruption was the impetus to actually study liberal philosophy and find it lacking.

People can muck up anything…even obscure an otherwise good system. If the conservative ideology is solid, Anita will stay and work to remove that which obscures the truth, rather than leave when disillusioned but human actions. The same might not be true for liberalism if the entire core is utter rot. “It’s the Ideas, stupid.”

Diane on October 17, 2009 at 10:59 AM

Excellent post Anita and a great story of personal courage.

PatMac on October 17, 2009 at 10:59 AM

Sorry for the redundancy in last comment…it should probably be illegal for me to be talking when I’m this tired.

Diane on October 17, 2009 at 11:01 AM

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 10:45 AM

Some proof please.

Anita, thank you!!!!!!

yoda on October 17, 2009 at 11:01 AM

That ought to be easy. You have 10 minutes. Begin.

unclesmrgol on October 17, 2009 at 10:55 AM

Organizations and individuals was my point.

Let’s see…

The Catholic Church, Haliburton, Rep. Mark Foley, Sen. Vitter, Sen. Craig…

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 11:01 AM

Anita,

This story is powerful. It is frightening to me the amount of pressure these liberal groups can put on people.
You are a woman of great character. I applaud you. Stay strong. The world needs more people like you.
Thank you for sharing and being true to truths!!!

bridgetown on October 17, 2009 at 11:02 AM

What amazing courage and character you have, Anita!

obladioblada on October 17, 2009 at 11:03 AM

Ms. Moncrief, I hope you and your family are holding up well after such a stressful two years. I can’t begin to imagine. You’ll never be sorry for doing the right thing. There are indeed disreputable people on both sides of the aisle, the difference is that conservatives will demand they face the consequences and liberal consider it a resume enhancement. You seem to have good instincts, trust them.

Cindy Munford on October 17, 2009 at 11:04 AM

Some of the links in the article aren’t working for me. If this is the case for others, could this fixed please? This is a very important post. Thanks.

Loxodonta on October 17, 2009 at 11:04 AM

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 11:01 AM

This is one woman’s story about her dealings with ACORN. Try to stay with us. If you have other stories to share, link to them, or just go away. You are exactly what she describes when she speaks of the pressures that people in ACORN can put on people. You are a sick person.

bridgetown on October 17, 2009 at 11:04 AM

Mr. Blizter, you say conservatives and their groups are also just as corrupt?

ACORN is responsible for tax evasion, advice to whores, advice to illegal immigrant child sex slavers, and rampant voter fraud. There is not one conservative or GOP organization that can even approach the corruption of ACORN.

ACORN and the new left Democrats are the new barbarians. They are destroying civilization and replacing civil society with primitive quasi-religious tribalism. The new left is ignorant of science, engineering, and finance. But you do have Soviet agit-prop down cold.
Mr. Blizter, please tell Soros we would like a better class of trolls.

Anita, thank you for your courage.

NaCly dog on October 17, 2009 at 11:05 AM

Try to stay with us.
bridgetown on October 17, 2009 at 11:04 AM

No thanks.

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 11:06 AM

Try to stay with us.
bridgetown on October 17, 2009 at 11:04 AM

No thanks.

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 11:06 AM

Then please go away.

Cindy Munford on October 17, 2009 at 11:07 AM

Anita, it was my pleasure to meet you personally at RightOnline in Pittsburgh. I can never thank you enough for your courage in the face of jackals such as Norman Blitzer.

jay12 on October 17, 2009 at 11:09 AM

Then please go away.

Cindy Munford on October 17, 2009 at 11:07 AM

No, so go stick it where the sun doesn’t shine on your body.

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 11:10 AM

What’s going to happen when you find out conservatives and their groups are also just as corrupt? What ideology will you run to then?

You had your 15 minutes of fame Anita, now go away!

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 10:45 AM

Where are these corrupt conservative groups? There is the left’s version of Sainthood, a Pulitzer, waiting for you if you get the goods. Get ‘em tiger!

Why just planning it may get you a Nobel.

IlikedAUH2O on October 17, 2009 at 11:10 AM

I can never thank you enough for your courage in the face of jackals such as Norman Blitzer.

jay12 on October 17, 2009 at 11:09 AM

That’s funny because that’s how I feel about you guys when it comes to Meghan McCain.

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 11:11 AM

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 11:06 AM

Troll alert…….

rich801 on October 17, 2009 at 11:12 AM

Dear Anita:

I greatly admire you for the service you have done for our country. Yes, you have made a difference for those of us who are poor and powerless. What you have done by following your conscience, and by standing up for the truth and honesty, is a miracle. We need more people like you.

Loxodonta on October 17, 2009 at 11:13 AM

No, so go stick it where the sun doesn’t shine on your body.

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 11:10 AM

Bwwwaaahhhhhhh hahahahahahaha
Are you serious with this type of comment? How old are you 4, 5. Really it’s time to back to your room and color. Your mommy will be in with a snack soon then it’s nap time.

milwife88 on October 17, 2009 at 11:13 AM

Anita..Thank you for your courage.

rich801 on October 17, 2009 at 11:13 AM

ANITA MONCRIEF…

That’s a Peace Prize!

Mojave Mark on October 17, 2009 at 11:14 AM

i am in your debt Ms Moncrief…

thank you….i pray for you and yours..

JJKRN on October 17, 2009 at 11:14 AM

Exposing all this corruption so far seems to have changed nothing! Obama’s numbers are still so high! How can this be communicated to the fair minded left? I am still convinced the really corrupt are a minority. But they are so effective. They were smart to infiltrate the media to the degree they have. This is a coup of epic size and scope.

Demonizing FoxNews is a brilliant move by them and unless we can somehow overcome that the truth will be obscured by this one trick.

What really needs to happen is for some other new outlet to take the same journey that this one brave woman has taken.

CNN? ABC? Do any of them have enough people with souls to do what this woman has done? Until some institution in the left controlled media turns the truth will continue to be buried.

petunia on October 17, 2009 at 11:15 AM

Hey Norman Blizter or who ever you are,

Get lost a$$hole…and while you are at it, GFYS on a rollin doughnut.

Old Hippie Vet on October 17, 2009 at 11:15 AM

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 11:10 AM

I am suitably chastened by your rhetorical skills. /

Cindy Munford on October 17, 2009 at 11:16 AM

Ms. Moncrief… You seem to have good instincts, trust them.

Cindy Munford on October 17, 2009 at 11:04 AM

Very much agreed.

Loxodonta on October 17, 2009 at 11:17 AM

Thank you Anita for exposing this corrupt organization. You have done a service to this country. While reading your latest column for HotAir, I’m reminded of the famous Thomas Jefferson quote, “All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.”

Truly great people are willing to take the arrows.

alwaysright43 on October 17, 2009 at 11:19 AM

No, so go stick it where the sun doesn’t shine on your body.

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 11:10 AM

This tool needs the banhammer.

Rebar on October 17, 2009 at 11:19 AM

The Catholic Church
Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 11:01 AM

No Catholic Democrats?

yoda on October 17, 2009 at 11:20 AM

God Bless you, Anita!

Bob's Kid on October 17, 2009 at 11:21 AM

No, so go stick it where the sun doesn’t shine on your body.

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 11:10 AM

There is no sunshine in your miserable little existence.

And reviewing your posts, it’s obvious that you’re stickless.

Loxodonta on October 17, 2009 at 11:21 AM

Anita,
What you are doing is not a liberal/Conservative thing. It is a moral right/wrong thing. May God Bless and give you peace through this turmoil. If you let your inner voice guild you, all will be as it should. The truth will set you free. I can not thank you enough for what you are doing for us Americans. You have become one of my Heroes. Courage is not being fearless, it is going forth in spite of our fears. You embody that.

IowaWoman on October 17, 2009 at 11:21 AM

No thanks.

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 11:06 AM

Don’t let the door hit you in your face idiot!

Keemo on October 17, 2009 at 11:22 AM

Then please go away.

Cindy Munford on October 17, 2009 at 11:07 AM

No, so go stick it where the sun doesn’t shine on your body.

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 11:10 AM

This sums up the level of civil discourse one can expect from an enlightened progressive.

alwaysright43 on October 17, 2009 at 11:24 AM

Rebar on October 17, 2009 at 11:19 AM

No, he’s fine. I think they refer to his type as “comic relief”.

Cindy Munford on October 17, 2009 at 11:25 AM

Very brave Anita. My hat is off to you for standing behind your personal convictions.
Your experience says as much about the NYT as ACORN.
Be well!

FireBlogger on October 17, 2009 at 11:26 AM

IowaWoman on October 17, 2009 at 11:21 AM

Well said… :-)

Keemo on October 17, 2009 at 11:26 AM

We not only have to keep turning over the stones and let the light in, but we also have to “stomp” whatever rears it’s ugly head. Cannot let it scurry off to another “hidey hole.”

retiredeagle on October 17, 2009 at 11:26 AM

Let’s see…

The Catholic Church, Haliburton, Rep. Mark Foley, Sen. Vitter, Sen. Craig…

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 11:01 AM

Wow that was quite quite lame. In fact I’m amazed that you have so little understanding of the immensity of the corruption on the left that you would bring up a few perverted politicians and think it is anyplace near the systematic corruption of Democracy that is ACORN.

Can you really not get it? Did Mark Foley conspire to elect a President to push an ideology that enriches a few and enslaves all others?

How about the Catholic church? Have they a complete strangle hold on the media? So much so that people are in deep fear for the foundations of Democracy?

Nothing, on the right or any place else for that matter compares in any way to the complete and utter corruption that is happening on the far left.

This threatens the very fabric of the social contract of our society! This has nothing to do with a few perverts.

petunia on October 17, 2009 at 11:26 AM

Anita Moncrief, you are a Great American. Your courage and grace under fire is exemplary. Your story brought me to tears especially when you began to see the evil that Liberals do towards their fellow man in the name of “helping” and “service”. It takes intestinal fortitude to leave their false message. Welcome home.

BetseyRoss on October 17, 2009 at 11:28 AM

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 11:10 AM

..’filthy rotten animal’. I have disinfected my screen. Now go away.

LEBA on October 17, 2009 at 11:32 AM

That’s funny because that’s how I feel about you guys when it comes to Meghan McCain.

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 11:11 AM

Too stupid. What corruption did Meghan uncover in her father’s presidential campaign, hmmmmmm?

jay12 on October 17, 2009 at 11:34 AM

Anita, integrity is one goal we should all share… You are a woman of great integrity and character and a shining example of one who has sacrificed much on behalf of the truth. Thank you, thank you, thank you!

LEBA on October 17, 2009 at 11:35 AM

That’s funny because that’s how I feel about you guys when it comes to Meghan McCain.

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 11:11 AM

What has Meghan McCain ever exposed knowing she would be attracted by the DNC/President/ACORN/her own Race/Liberals/NYT/NBC/ABC/MSNBC/CNN etc.? When has Meghan McCain ever shown Courage? Spoke truth in detriment to herself? Has Meghan McCain ever put a moral issue before her self? Ever?
You insult Anita by the comparison.

IowaWoman on October 17, 2009 at 11:36 AM

Anita, you are a hero! Thank you.

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 11:01 AM

The Church is hardly conservative, nor are they part of the American Political system. Acorn is a huge, corrupt organization that is part of the democratic party.

Attempting to equate the Church with Acorn is a telling illustration of your immaturity as well as some very obvious deficiencies in your critical thinking skills.

You’re just a hatefull lib. Attacking someone who did the right thing also shows you’re a real lowlife. I think you’re the one that should “go away” until you learn how to behave in polite society.

dogsoldier on October 17, 2009 at 11:39 AM

I reckon ol’ Norman has his head so far up his ass he needs to open his mouth to see where he’s goin’

and where he’s goin’ is far Left

Dear Anita, I admire you and am thankful for your hard work & courage. May God bless you and your loved ones.

Happy Saturday,

Catch

CatchAll on October 17, 2009 at 11:39 AM

Norman Blizter is an insult to Hot Air. Is there no Liberals out there that can do a better job then blizzard? I hope Soros is not paying him much, he is worth less then he is getting, what ever that is.

IowaWoman on October 17, 2009 at 11:43 AM

The Catholic Church, Haliburton, Rep. Mark Foley, Sen. Vitter, Sen. Craig…

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 11:01 AM

The Catholic Church? I don’t think so. And I don’t think the Catholic Church counts as either conservative or liberal. For each conservative position (on abortion, for example), there is a liberal position (on immigration, for example). If you are talking about pedophilia, it’s interesting that it’s the homosexuals who did that — and they were liberals to boot. We’ve purged them, and we stopped believing the APA’s position that pedophilia was a curable disease (of course, we also have repudiated the APA position that the related affliction, homosexuality, is not a disease). Strike one, Mr. Blizter.

Haliburton — you mean the Haliburton that had the majority of sole-source contracts under the Clinton Administration? That Haliburton, who has provided key logistical services, year in and year out, regardless of whether a conservative or liberal was at the helm? Haliburton is not a political organization, either conservative or liberal. Sorry, strike two for you, Mr. Blizter.

Your final point takes in three individuals. Individuals are not organizations, so you are flirting with Strike Three.

Let’s address each of these individuals.

Mr. Foley is now out of office — he was forced to resign. If ACORN had his ethics, they would be shutting down. I’ll go further there. Since his crimes were sexual in nature but rise to the level of corruption — hitting on the hired help — I’ll match him with Mr. Clinton, who also hit on the hired help in an equally penetrating fashion, and whose behavior apparently was completely acceptable to the Democrats.

Rep. Vitter? His crime is not corruption, but was of a more personal nature. I’ll match him to Rep. Murtha, whose sexual peccadilloes easily match and exceed Vitter’s. In addition, Murtha has a far more extensive range of what I will call real corruption. If you think Haliburton is corrupt, then you’ll certainly think the same of Kuchera Corporation

Ditto for ex-Senator Craig, who no longer holds office for something which wasn’t corruption, but was, again, a personal peccadillo.

Again, note that the one Republican you mention who was truly corrupt (by “hitting on the hired help”) was forced to resign by his own constituents. We clean our house in a way the Democrats never will. And that is, I believe, Strike Three, Mr. Blizter. You’re OUT!.

unclesmrgol on October 17, 2009 at 11:46 AM

Anita, thank you for your courage and may God bless you and keep you safe. What you have done and are doing is heroic and a great service to our country. We need more like you to step forward.

silvernana on October 17, 2009 at 11:46 AM

You’re a very brave woman. Thank you and God bless.

beachgirlusa on October 17, 2009 at 11:48 AM

Anita,

A big hug from me!

Norman Blitzer,

Just go to Hell!

newton on October 17, 2009 at 11:48 AM

Here’s Anita’s blog and here’s Anita’s Facebook fan site.

Loxodonta on October 17, 2009 at 11:50 AM

You had your 15 minutes of fame Anita, now go away!

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 10:45 AM

Mr. Blizter.

Thank you for your well-put and highly intelligent response to Ms. Moncrief’s article. It’s not often that posters here take the time to put such great thought into their comments and yours should be held up as a shining example of liberal thought – particularly your wise use of attacking the messenger when there’s literally nothing else to offer in response.

Should anyone here accuse you of being an empty-headed moron incapable of meaningful discourse, just ignore them and rely on the self-impression that you’re a highly intellegent and respected member of the liberal community.

PS: Looking forward to what I’m sure will be a long list of corrupt conservative organizations that Unclesmrgol has requested of you. I’d suggest that you start right away in compiling that list as any delay on your part could be construed to mean that they don’t exist. And if that’s the case, then people might start to think that Acorn is the most corrupt and blatantly politicized non-profit-organization-sucking-on-the-public-tit that has ever existed. I’m sure you don’t want that.

So get to it. Get us that list.

And again, great post. It leaves a remarkable impression of your true character.

Rod on October 17, 2009 at 11:51 AM

petunia on October 17, 2009 at 11:15 AM

The media has all been bought and paid for. They were threatened before and after the election that they would be destroyed through “diversity requirements” after the inauguration if they dared to mention that there were any eligibility issues.

ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox, and CNN were all threatened at the top levels and they passed the threats – apparently even expanding them to personal threats – on to their anchors and talk show hosts. I’m pretty sure that has something to do with why Michelle Malkin poo-poohs the whole thing even though she is usually clear-thinking.

But regardless of what you think of the eligibility issue, the fact is now established that the media has caved in to threats on that issue. Maybe now that it’s seen that there is resistance to the czars and the power they want to wield, the media folks won’t be so threatened by being regulated out of existence via “diversity” (Obama’s weapon of choice).

You can listen to the investigator who has the proof of Obama’s media threats at

http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour1Aug0709.mp3

http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour2Aug0709.mp3

http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour3Aug0709.mp3

Or an article giving some of the information is at
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13373

justincase on October 17, 2009 at 11:52 AM

We’re in debt to you, Anita.

latinchic on October 17, 2009 at 11:55 AM

No, he’s fine. I think they refer to his type as “comic relief”.

Cindy Munford on October 17, 2009 at 11:25 AM

I agree generally, but generally comic relief is funny. Norman’s not funny. Like most trolls, he’s a pinata filled with duck vomit. Give him a few hits and all the nastiness comes spilling out.

Mr. D on October 17, 2009 at 11:56 AM

Thank you Anita!!! You remind me of a few people….mmmmm….lets see…. Sarah Palin, Rush, Mark Levin, Beck, Michael Berry, Fox news, the Cheney\’s, Bill O, Michelle Maulkin, Michele Bachmann, Joe Wilson, Jim DeMint, Greta, Tammy Bruce, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Dr Zero, Karl Rove, Dennis Miller, Andrew Breitbart, Victoria Jackson, the Tea Party Patriots, and I could go on and on but my favorite is our great Military. The truth will set us free, keep up the great work Anita we have your back!

jeaneeinabottle on October 17, 2009 at 12:00 PM

What’s going to happen when you find out conservatives and their groups are also just as corrupt? What ideology will you run to then?

You had your 15 minutes of fame Anita, now go away!

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 10:45 AM

This message paid for by Obama/DNC/ACORN/SEIU. “Shut up. Or we’ll find you!”

BKennedy on October 17, 2009 at 12:00 PM

I find that to address trolls directly only spurs them on, to more and more outrageous commentary and to the detriment of the thread. I’m thinking it’s better to discuss among ourselves any criticisms to the edification of us, not a troll’s ego. That also has the benefit of cheesing them off, which arguing with them doesn’t do at all.

More and more, seemingly at faster speed, the Left is taking hits. The ACORN flap is at least as large as the recent attempt by the Left to crush Rush Limbaugh. People are fighting back at long last against the machine that has poisoned our culture, infected our schools, and otherwise diminished the coherence of our society.

Thanks, Anita! You’re a great American!

Liam on October 17, 2009 at 12:02 PM

I too worked for various left-leaning nonprofits and considered myself proudly liberal. But after I was essentially blacklisted after naively expressing my newfound enlightenment about abortion (I was becoming prolife) and 9-11 then happened, I began to see how I had been manipulated by a culture that preys on one’s ignorance and virtue.
I can understand the apprehension stated here by the author, I too thought conservatives were an angry, unloving lot because that is what I was told, I didn’t actually know any personally. I can understand when my liberal friends think I am a conspiratorial nut, because truly the media/education/entertainment establishment is constantly pushing an expensive and pervasive propaganda in ways you can’t understand unless the scales are pulled off the eyes.

Congrats to the author for having the integrity and courage to do what is right. This is what makes this country great.

quiz1 on October 17, 2009 at 12:04 PM

A note to Anita: You are a wonderful, remarkable, and unique woman.

Our nation was promised “change”. Unfortunately, most of that vague promise is turning out to be change for the worse.

Change for the better stems from people like you who set themselves aside in order to pursue and illuminate truth.

God bless and protect you.

Rod on October 17, 2009 at 12:04 PM

Anita,
As some one who started out as a left liberal and who made the eventual course correction to conservative/libertarian outlook in life,I can only say – WELCOME HOME !!

I can only thank God that i didnt have to go through such danger and mental agony on my road to conservative change. You are a brave woman. Thank God for a person like Marcel who was there when you needed her.

One thing that us former lefties are chastened about is how just “meaning well” for poor people without thinking through what it actually does to them is one of the most dangerous and terrible things we could do to the poor people.

The Democrat party flat out sickens me – the GOP right now is being schooled on conservatism by the Tea Party movement. Even when things seems lost and we have an absolute lack of leadership or common sense, there comes along one person like Anita Moncrief – she gives me hope.

Thank you Anita and wish you all the best.

nagee76 on October 17, 2009 at 12:06 PM

While the Obama camp will not admit it, the campaign and his whole presidency has been about race

This is the dirty little secret that the MSM will never tell its audience.

mydh12 on October 17, 2009 at 12:15 PM

I find that to address trolls directly only spurs them on, to more and more outrageous commentary and to the detriment of the thread.
Liam on October 17, 2009 at 12:02 PM

The troll’s first post is always germaine to the discussion. In the case of Blizter, he wanted to shut down Anita, and in doing so, makes a claim which he cannot buttress by fact — that conservative organizations are just as corrupt as liberal ones. In other words, he makes an argument for a quid pro quo arrangement — “I’ll trade one corrupt liberal organization for one corrupt conservative organization”, and then proceeds to claim that his trade is already satified.

Obviously a teachable moment for both Mr. Blizter and for any other person reading this thread.

Given that Anita is addressing a certain type of corruption (where an organization takes targeted federal funds and converts them to uses which are illegal), it is certainly Mr. Blizter’s right to broaden the concept of corruption. He, of course, attempted to broaden it into instances of what are obviously wrongdoing (if not illegal), but which do not rise to the level of corruption (use of public office for private monetary gain).

Out of such fuzzy thought arise teachable moments.

We are only constrained by what Ed Morrissey and Allahpundit want us to do. The ban hammer is, I think, not operational here. Besides, Mr. Blizter represents his entire side here — their morals and their ethics — and don’t you think he’s doing a wonderful job?

unclesmrgol on October 17, 2009 at 12:16 PM

Courageous.

ted c on October 17, 2009 at 12:31 PM

…and don’t you think he’s doing a wonderful job?

unclesmrgol on October 17, 2009 at 12:16 PM

Totally!

I’m all for refuting nonsense, but my thinking is to not address the troll directly, for I believe they get their jollies causing a stir. We can still discuss the opposing points as if they came out of the blue. Which, really, is from where they often come.

I’ve encountered all the ways libs try getting off a hook. The ‘well, what about…?’ argument is a fave. It’s as if one relatively small matter from our side negates a mass of larger ones on theirs. It’s much like the Clinton argument that all past presidents cheated on their wives, so Clinton should be allowed a pass.

I guess I long ago became bored with a yes-you-did/no-I-didn’t form of debate. I find it easier to refute nonsense directly in a more general way instead of giving full credence the person making silly comments.

Liam on October 17, 2009 at 12:32 PM

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 11:11 AM

Troll or Putz, its a difficult choice but one Im sure we can compromise on, Thats it, a bipartisan solution to the matter!You sir are a Putztroll.

Viper1 on October 17, 2009 at 12:38 PM

Anita,

You have tremendous courage. You are a true patriot and have done a great service for this country. Many thanks!!!

abycat on October 17, 2009 at 12:41 PM

Putztroll.

Viper1 on October 17, 2009 at 12:38 PM

Hey, can I use that term, too? I love it; it has a nice ring!

Liam on October 17, 2009 at 12:42 PM

I guess I long ago became bored with a yes-you-did/no-I-didn’t form of debate. I find it easier to refute nonsense directly in a more general way instead of giving full credence the person making silly comments.

Liam on October 17, 2009 at 12:32 PM

Facts either buttress or refute generalities. When a troll makes a statement on topic, or nearly on topic, any ignorance of it by the other participants makes it seem true to the next “on the fence” reader in line. Mr. Blitzer’s rather caustic justification for corruption needed to be addressed. One doesn’t address such things by resorting to name-calling (as some people here seem to be doing), but by teasing out and disputing the underlying axioms of your opponent’s argument. If you can prove that his/her axioms are false, than any overarching proof he/she constructs from those axioms are also suspect. Remember, T always implies T, but F implies T and F implies F also. It’s sufficient to prove the antecedent false to collapse your opponent’s house of cards built on that antecedent, because it is impossible to know whether the house is a T or an F.

unclesmrgol on October 17, 2009 at 12:45 PM

What’s going to happen when you find out conservatives and their groups are also just as corrupt? What ideology will you run to then?

You had your 15 minutes of fame Anita, now go away!

Norman Blizter on October 17, 2009 at 10:45 AM

Wolfe, is that you?

BigMike252 on October 17, 2009 at 12:47 PM

Halliburton is just a for-profit oil services company.

blink on October 17, 2009 at 12:43 PM

Not quite. Halliburton is a for-profit logistics company. They specialize in moving large amounts of supplies (including humans) from one place to another safely, and in such a fashion as to be operational at their destination.

unclesmrgol on October 17, 2009 at 12:48 PM

Remember, T always implies T, but F implies T and F implies F also. It’s sufficient to prove the antecedent false to collapse your opponent’s house of cards built on that antecedent, because it is impossible to know whether the house is a T or an F.
unclesmrgol on October 17, 2009 at 12:45 PM

I take your point, but I have one question: Can I buy a vowel?
~LOL~

Liam on October 17, 2009 at 12:48 PM

Anita Moncrief, you are a Great American. Your courage and grace under fire is exemplary.

My thoughts exactly. Anita you are one brave woman. Thank you.

johnnybgood on October 17, 2009 at 12:50 PM

’m all for refuting nonsense, but my thinking is to not address the troll directly, for I believe they get their jollies causing a stir.

Liam on October 17, 2009 at 12:32 PM

I’m in agreement with you here. I’ve found it much more effective to talk about them than to them. I must point out though that this sort of post

Rod on October 17, 2009 at 11:51 AM

is very effective too, especially when it’s that well written. Kudos to Rod on that post.

Oldnuke on October 17, 2009 at 12:51 PM

Liam on October 17, 2009 at 12:48 PM

How about I give them to you, as well as the “w”, “y”, and “j”.

Just don’t step on the “j”, even if it doesn’t exist in Latin.

unclesmrgol on October 17, 2009 at 12:52 PM

Norman Blizter

Just curious Norm, when you read, do you only see some of the words, or do you see words that arent there? Perhaps a combination of both learning disabilities?

Anita, very well done. I think we all can learn and benefit from your experience, I appreciate the courage you show in describing what are deeply personal issues. Kudos.

JusDreamin on October 17, 2009 at 12:57 PM

Thank you Anita. Stay strong. I’m sure you have many people praying for you.

God bless,

Mark

aikidoka on October 17, 2009 at 12:57 PM

You are a very brave woman Anita – keep up the good work and don’t let the wankers get you down. . . .

karra on October 17, 2009 at 12:58 PM

Thank you for all of the great comments and support. Someone mentioned a link problem and I have corrected it on the original post in the Greenroom. I hope it will transfer over soon. Thanks again, I have learned to draw strength from people like you guys and the friends that I have found on Twitter. The MSM may keep the truth from some, but real Americans have stood behind me and it keeps me going.

Anita MonCrief on October 17, 2009 at 1:00 PM

Anita walked into the valley
With the truth clutched in her hand
She was only a girl, but she knew
Someone must take a stand

There will always be a valley
Always mountains one must scale
There will always be perilous waters
Which someone must sail

PercyB on October 17, 2009 at 1:00 PM

Thank you Anita.. I had been thinking that going into 2010 and 2012, we(conservatives) were doomed.. I now have “hope” to “change” the direction of this country back to one without Obama/Pelosi/Reed. One of prosperity and liberty.
I wonder why the Dems/Libs hate conservative women? Bachmann, Palin, Moncreif, Condi Rice, and now Liz Cheney.. They hate strong independent women, which was how I always thought the feminazis were.

reshas1 on October 17, 2009 at 1:04 PM

When Anita comes home with her journalism prize
Hurrah! Hurrah!
We’ll give her a hearty welcome then
Hurrah! Hurrah!
The Hotair men will cheer and shout
The Hotair ladies they will all turn out
And we’ll all feel great when Anita comes home with her journalism prize

The old church bell will peal with joy
Hurrah! Hurrah!
To welcome home our darling girl
Hurrah! Hurrah!
The Hotair lads and lassies say
With roses they will strew the way
And we’ll all feel great when Anita comes home with her journalism prize

Get ready for the Jubilee
Hurrah! Hurrah!
We’ll give our hero three times three
Hurrah! Hurrah!
The laurel wreath is ready now
To place upon Anita’s courageous brow
And we’ll all feel great when Anita comes home with her journalism prize

Let truth and justice rule on that day
Hurrah, hurrah!
Their choicest pleasures then display
Hurrah, hurrah!
And let each one perform some part
To fill with truth some others heart
And we’ll all feel great when Anita comes home with her journalism prize

Cheshire Cat on October 17, 2009 at 1:17 PM

Halliburton is just a for-profit oil services company.

blink on October 17, 2009 at 12:43 PM

Not quite. Halliburton is a for-profit logistics company. They specialize in moving large amounts of supplies (including humans) from one place to another safely, and in such a fashion as to be operational at their destination.

unclesmrgol on October 17, 2009 at 12:48 PM

Actually, you’re both 100% correct.

(This is trite, OT, and foolish of me but I was bugged a bit about it because I know Hailburton well having spent over 30 years working in the petrochemical industry.)(worked beside them and had them as a client)

Haliburton

Rod on October 17, 2009 at 1:27 PM

Comment pages: 1 2