OK.OK. We get it! Allah and Ed don’t like Sarah.

They’re redoubling their efforts and ratcheting up the attacks. The headlines are ridiculous: “Both Romney and Huckabee crushing Palin in head-on polls”. Dumb. So dumb there is nothing more to say on the matter.

CC

She is a quitter and a loser as a matter of fact.

What does this mean???
And if you look at Palin’s record and history, she hasn’t been a loser, for the most part.

As a candidate, she’s a complete and utter failure, and always will be.
voxpopuli on October 18, 2009 at 11:22 PM

Palin and McCain didn’t lose by much (4% of the popular vote) and many think that’s because of Sarah, that McCain was seriously losing before he put her on the ticket.
Thousands of folks turned out to her rallies and continue to show up anywhere she appears.
She has almost 1 million fans on Facebook.
Her new book has certainly sold over 2 million copies.
When she posts her position on the issues on Facebook, even Barack pays attention (ex: “death panels”).

Because she has proven herself not be the brightest bulb in the chandelier

And how has she done this, exactly?
And what is your definition of “brightest bulb?”

I like her, but she doesn’t have what it takes.

happy2behere on October 19, 2009 at 2:02 AM

Again, what do you define as “what it takes?”
And to do what, precisely?

You’re not going to get away with those couple of throwaway remarks on here….well, not and be taken seriously.

Reagan, Clinton and Bush were all re-elected as governors. That’s a stark contrast to resigning during a first term.

dedalus on October 17, 2009 at 10:13 PM

It’s a contrast, but a meaningless one.
It says what, exactly?

Had Palin not been chosen as McCain’s VP, she most certainly would have gone on to re-election and a 2nd, equally successful term as governor.

Oh I see . . . it’s jealousy. Wow. Suddenly the blinds have been lifted.

voxpopuli on October 18, 2009 at 11:27 PM

Wrong again. I was highlighting your immaturity not your envy.

Do you genuinely believe that your whining about someone who has accomplished far more than you ever will somehow makes her less and you more?

After the first two or three pouts you sound like a kid whose mother refused to buy him the box of cereal with the Nobel Prize inside.

viking01 on October 18, 2009 at 2:18 PM

Oh I see . . . it’s jealousy. Wow. Suddenly the blinds have been lifted.

I’m 100% behind Sarah, and for right now – That’s all that counts.

huckleberryfriend on October 18, 2009 at 5:51 PM

Brilliant and insightful . . . clearly a true member of the Palin camp.

Let’s face it, Sarah Palin doesn’t have what most American’s look for in a candidate

Yeah, like the ability to think deep thoughts (instead of jingoisms) . . .

Courage . . .

Perseverence . . .

Time to move on.

The fact remains that as hard as you try to stick the QUITTER and LOSER label to her and count her out of politics, she is a compelling figure, a political star with sharp instincts, the consummate outsider’s outsider and a frontrunner in the 2012 primaries depending on her performance between now and then. :)

I’m not trying to stick her with anything. She is a quitter and a loser as a matter of fact. Just simple facts. And eeeeeverybody knows it.

I’m not saying quit politics. I believe she has a great role. But not as a candidate. As a candidate, she’s a complete and utter failure, and always will be. Time to move on.

Oh, and by the way, “depending upon his performance between now and then,” my dog is also a “frontrunner” for the 2012 primaries. ;)

And Governor – oh, yeah, that’s right, Mrs. – Palin, how about you stop whining about the Obamedia being the bottom-feeding extremist gutter trash they are?  God knows if anybody has earned the right to promiscuously and publicly point……

Bradky on October 18, 2009 at 12:05 AM

You wouldn’t know an Original Thought if it bit you in your fat butt. Nice try on the ‘hiding’: I’ve posted my real name several times on this blog, unlike you. I only insult people who beg for it, which you sometimes do.

Your posts show little education, low intelligence, and a clumsy stupidity which veers into sad attempts to sound like you actually know something. You repeat what you think are clever bits, but can’t come with anything worthwhile.

They attack her because, as a QUITTER and a LOSER, she’s the WEAK LINK, genius.

voxpopuli on October 18, 2009 at 5:11 AM

Do you genuinely believe that your whining about someone who has accomplished far more than you ever will somehow makes her less and you more?

After the first two or three pouts you sound like a kid whose mother refused to buy him the box of cereal with the Nobel Prize inside.

I’d prefer her ideas at this point.

They attack her because, as a QUITTER and a LOSER, she’s the WEAK LINK, genius.

voxpopuli on October 18, 2009 at 5:11 AM

If that were true, then Sarah Palin would not have been invited to speak at a French firm’s address to Asian investors. She was paid a handsome six figure speaker’s fee for that, so that throw’s out any notion that this was some joke.

If Sarah Palin were irrelevant, nobody would care what she wrote on Facebook. If she were as stupid as you claim, or a LOSER, the death panels argument would have been widely ridiculed. It was, however, only marginally ridiculed by the White House and their sycophants.

The fact remains that as hard as you try to stick the QUITTER and LOSER label to her and count her out of politics, she is a compelling figure, a political star with sharp instincts, the consummate outsider’s outsider and a frontrunner in the 2012 primaries depending on her performance between now and then. :)

Notice that the Democrats NEVER attack Huckabee….cause THEY DON”T FEAR HIM! They FEAR Palin..why? cause she creates MASSIVE appeal for her policies. Palin 2012.

royzer on October 17, 2009 at 7:18 PM

They attack her because, as a QUITTER and a LOSER, she’s the WEAK LINK, genius.

Wow. How the Palin haters (invisible for weeks) come out of the woodwork to try to stink things up. I’m reminded of Noonan and the other usual highbrow suspects trying oh so hard to sound superior. Truly laughable.

Palin obviously is a political phenomenon. Whether she wins next election, who knows? Yet the venom she generates from her pretentious, oh-so-holy, critics reveals her to be a political force not to be underestimated.

viking01 on October 17, 2009 at 7:13 PM

When will you followers of this LOSER learn what a crap argument this is: “She provokes strong reaction, therefore she’s a ‘political force not to be underestimated.’”

Um . . . Nooooooo . . . It’s just that many of us actually care about the future of the party, and the future of conservativism. It is frustrating to us to see so many who have drank the Palin-aide still clinging to their foolish beliefs.

It’s not because she’s a “powerful force,” it’s because she’s a blithering idiot and thus, political suicide. You’d get the same reaction if you kept blowing on, and on, (and on) about Alan Keys, for example.

Get it? Palin = Loser = dangerous to the right.

Mmmmmm-kay?