HuffPo, Rick Sanchez retract phony Limbaugh quotes

posted at 9:28 pm on October 15, 2009 by Allahpundit

No harm in admitting the lie now that his NFL bid’s dead. First, via the Standard, comes this belated HuffPo postscript to a post that’s three years old:

Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this post contained quotes attributed to Rush Limbaugh, which Limbaugh has since denied making. As is our policy when a fact in a blog post is called into question, we gave its author 24 hours to substantiate the quote. Since he has not been able to do so, the quotes have been deleted from the post.

And now here’s Sanchez, kinda sorta apologizing — on Twitter — for airing the bogus slavery quote on his show earlier this week:

i’ve know rush. in person,i like him. his rhetoric,however is inexcusably divisive. he’s right tho. we didn’t confirm quote. our bad.

Proof that Limbaugh’s threat to sue people over this is being taken seriously? Eh, I doubt it. As I said before, it’s really hard for a public figure to prove defamation. He’d basically have to show that his accusers knew the quote was false and published it anyway; both HuffPo and Sanchez would reply that they didn’t know and were merely lazy, sloppy, negligent reporters in relying on published sources for a quote that they hadn’t fact-checked. The retractions, I suspect, are motivated less by fear of being sued than as a lame nod to journalistic ethics. “See, we correct our highly incendiary errors. …Eventually.”

Meanwhile, it’s safe to say that the Journal’s solved the mystery of why Olbermann, of all people, came to Rush’s defense a few days ago:

What happened here, and is happening elsewhere in American life, is that Mr. Limbaugh’s outspoken political conservatism is being deemed sufficient reason to ostracize him from polite society. By contrast, MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann, who fires off his own brand of high-velocity, left-wing political commentary but lacks Mr. Limbaugh’s sense of humor, appears weekly as co-host of NBC’s “Football Night in America.” We haven’t heard anyone on the right say Mr. Olbermann’s nightly ad-hominem rants should disqualify him from hanging around the NFL. Al Franken made it all the way to the U.S. Senate on a river of political vitriol…

It is no secret that this country’s politics has become intense across the ideological spectrum. Rush Limbaugh lets his listeners blow off steam and then get on with the rest of their day. But if the people who claim to worry about such things want to see a truly angry right develop in this country, they should continue to remain silent while the left tries to drive Rush Limbaugh and others out of American political life. If that happens, the NFL by comparison will look like an afternoon tea.

You would be hearing complaints about Olby now if he’d joined the chorus against Limbaugh, but Kayo was one step ahead of the game this time. Is Soros?

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4

“Magic Negro” karma.

Decider on October 16, 2009 at 2:01 AM

Blake and DeathtotheSwiss

This is why Allah doesn’t want any talk about LGF–good grief!

lovingmyUSA on October 16, 2009 at 2:13 AM

We haven’t heard anyone on the right say Mr. Olbermann’s nightly ad-hominem rants should disqualify him from hanging around the NFL.

Mr. Olbermann’s nightly ad-hominem rants should disqualify him from hanging around the NFL.

(same goes for Letterman and Indy)

Ronnie on October 16, 2009 at 2:15 AM

Sorry, Death, but anyone can google your posts and see the dishonest junk you post for your master CJ. You are the one unhinged if you think that you and the smear circus that you were a part of until very recently over at lgf are worthy of a scholarly rebuttal. Frankly, you aren’t worth more than a big FU. I hope you do win back CJ’s heart and go back to that swamp.

Blake on October 16, 2009 at 2:19 AM

He’d basically have to show that his accusers knew the quote was false and published it anyway

And?

How much more debased the attack before you realize the people attacking you are debased?

Jim Treacher on October 16, 2009 at 2:20 AM

This is why Allah doesn’t want any talk about LGF–good grief!

lovingmyUSA on October 16, 2009 at 2:13 AM

These are the people who slimed HA, HA commenters, and half the blogosphere. We’re all racists, dontcha’ know? They get banned and then slither over here. He’s one of them. I’m not about to give him a high five.

Blake on October 16, 2009 at 2:22 AM

I think CJ writes most of the hate mail he receives himself. He’s crazy enough to do it. Plus, he’s so nutty, he probably interprets an email saying, “just wanted to say hi”, as a death threat. LOL

Blake on October 16, 2009 at 2:37 AM

HUFFPO AND SANCHEZ ARE LIARS.

TO SANCHEZ … YOU ARE NOT BAD. YOU ARE MALICIOUS EVIL!

TheAlamos on October 16, 2009 at 2:50 AM

He’d basically have to show that his accusers knew the quote was false and published it anyway

So, does that mean I can run around calling Sanchez a child molester because, technically, I don’t really know that it isn’t true?

xblade on October 16, 2009 at 2:54 AM

I’m not much of a Limbaugh fan but I am very disturbed by the leftie’s instituting of a political test before people are allowed to participate in business activities. This is tantamount to a throwback to the effing Counter Reformation mentality.
I listened to some of Rush’s callers today. Many seemed to be experiencing severe distress from the conflicting pulls of loyalty between Rush and the NFL. The lefties are striking at people where they live and I don’t think the lefties are going to enjoy all of the repercussions.

snaggletoothie on October 16, 2009 at 2:58 AM

If this was happening in the UK, Rush could have sued for libel. He would have won millions in damages and the courts would have forced HuffPo & CNN to carry grovelling apologies in prominent positions.

uptight on October 16, 2009 at 3:08 AM

Jeez, stop with the fixation on LGF–just let the turd fade into oblivation. His viewers are in the double-digit now–soon to be single. We have better things to talk about…

lovingmyUSA on October 15, 2009 at 10:58 PM

I agree. The worthless jazz musician who normally plays somewhere in the background is thirsty for attention. Any “blog war” involving him is comparable to a failing hip hop artist attacking another in an attempt to get back into the spotlight. Don’t feed the troll.

As for Sanchez, what a worthless “retraction”. What is with the “our bad”? If you’re going to sound like a teenager at least take full responsibility yourself and say “MY bad”. Funny how scum like him always start thinking like a team when in error.

Daemonocracy on October 16, 2009 at 3:11 AM

Rush is brilliant. See, he started off his ruse by pretending to want to own a part of an NFL franchise. But he knew that the MSM could not contain themselves and would erupt with all their hatred directed at him. Then, his real plan clicks into place, and he sues to own CNN.

Some throw pillows, some window treatments, change the name to RNN (or LNN) and, voila! no more cesspool.

Left Coast Right Mind on October 16, 2009 at 3:22 AM

These character assassins are total scum. I can’t figure out how they can look at themselves in the mirror.

NavyMustang on October 16, 2009 at 3:33 AM

Above all, Ponyboy is a businessman. Every time he gets mentioned, he wins.

Jim R. on October 16, 2009 at 3:40 AM

These character assassins are total scum. I can’t figure out how they can look at themselves in the mirror.

NavyMustang on October 16, 2009 at 3:33 AM

“Mirror, mirror on the wall”

Johan Klaus on October 16, 2009 at 4:21 AM

This whole game is played like the proverbial courtroom scene, when the lawyer says something he’s not supposed to say -the jury gasps and alters their thinking -the judge instructs the jury to ignore what was said and the nasty little lawyer wins, because his goal only needed a moment to cause victory.

Damage done – say oooops, and go home with the trophy.

It’s called a sucker punch, except it is the default operating method for the amoral left.

Don L on October 16, 2009 at 4:32 AM

He’d basically have to show that his accusers knew the quote was false and published it anyway;

his accusers knew (or should have known) the quote was false.

both HuffPo and Sanchez would reply that they didn’t know and were merely lazy, sloppy, negligent reporters in relying on published sources for a quote that they hadn’t fact-checked.

HuffPo may get away with claiming they are moronically stupid, however “Sanchez” as an MSNBC Anchor, has a duty to “FACT CHECK” such inflammatory “quotes” BEFORE they aired them.

It’ MSNBC, not Sanchez, that would be sued.
Remember “memo gate”?

DSchoen on October 16, 2009 at 4:52 AM

One would think that this blatant oppression by those who now hold all political power would scare a lot of Americans who have sat on the sidelines. This is bad. The left is totally power drunk.

I understand that is a common situation for Sanchez… I believe he killed someone while driving drunk before. Whether it is alcohol or power the intoxication has become dangerous for society.

petunia on October 16, 2009 at 5:11 AM

Could you imagine the air time that would have been used up exposing all the lies and distortions of Moore’s 9/11 movie.

Instead they called it a “documentary” and gave him an oscar.

Bashing Bush and the Iraq war pretty much became a prerequisite of winning an emmy or an oscar over the last few years.

I hear bashing Bush gets some people Nobel Prizes as well.

petunia on October 16, 2009 at 5:21 AM

the courts have found that gross failure of due diligence to check facts is an indicator of malice.
Rational Thought on October 15, 2009 at 9:50 PM

CNN didn’t “Fact check” the bogus Rush quotes
BUT
CNN did “Fact check” a SNL skit?

DSchoen on October 16, 2009 at 5:53 AM

We haven’t heard anyone on the right say Mr. Olbermann’s nightly ad-hominem rants should disqualify him from hanging around the NFL.

They haven’t been in my living room on any given Sunday night from September to January.

Captain Scarlet on October 16, 2009 at 6:19 AM

“Magic Negro” karma.

Decider on October 16, 2009 at 2:01 AM

??

You ARE aware that particular quote originally came from the LA Times in an Editorial OP-ED about how white people like Obama because he is the “Magic Negro” and by voting for him they absolve themselves of “White Guilt”?

Oh, and the writer? A black man.

You DID know that, right?

Or are you just trolling?

wearyman on October 16, 2009 at 6:37 AM

Above all, Ponyboy is a businessman. Every time he gets mentioned, he wins.

Jim R. on October 16, 2009 at 3:40 AM

Who is Ponyboy?

Jaibones on October 16, 2009 at 6:38 AM

Rush should read fake grovelling apologies on air, today.

uptight on October 16, 2009 at 7:25 AM

Who is Ponyboy?

Jaibones on October 16, 2009 at 6:38 AM

A certain blogger who’s become the bete noir of this place.

Jim R. on October 16, 2009 at 7:27 AM

Rush should read fake grovelling apologies on air, today.

uptight on October 16, 2009 at 7:25 AM

Rush should lock and load and go out after these people.

highhopes on October 16, 2009 at 7:33 AM

The Democrat Party, every element of the old media including sports writers, network television, Hollywood, most of the music industry, are 100% at war with anything non-Liberal-socialist. Everybody needs to understand this basic reality when looking at the behavior on display today. This is an “all in” move taking place; now or never mind set.

The NFL is dominated by the players UNION, and is not dominated by principle. Unions are all about hate, seek, and destroy anything that does not fit their mold-agenda.

Personally, the NFL just showed me that politics are very much alive within their industry. I have not seen one NFL official stand up to protect the rights of Mr. Limbaugh, nor have I seen one NFL official denounce the hate filled rhetoric launched from within their own offices.

Sad really. FU NFL!

Keemo on October 16, 2009 at 7:35 AM

Again, the standard as I understand it for defamation of a public figure in the US is that the plantiff either has to show that the defendant knew the state was false when they made it or that they acted with malice or reckless disregard for the truth when they made the statement.

That’s a mighty tall hurdle.

SteveMG on October 15, 2009 at 9:50 PM

But maybe he doesn’t have to prevail. Might it not be sufficient to get this stuff out into the open so that the public can see whats really going on, the hate from the lefties?

There are several flavors of “Winning”.

johnsteele on October 16, 2009 at 7:51 AM

Rush was fired from the sports show he was on over that whole black successful quarterback analysis. It was just an analysis which they asked him for and he lost the gig over it. These many years later he is still paying a price. I think its white discrimination in all honesty. Rush does need to quit the whininig over it and move on once he’s drilled his point into Sharpton and co.

johnnyU on October 16, 2009 at 8:12 AM

yeah and the NFL partaking in it is quite disappointing. Business decisions based on race is wrong.

johnnyU on October 16, 2009 at 8:14 AM

“Magic Negro” karma.

Decider on October 16, 2009 at 2:01 AM

Really? Something happened to the LA Times? I missed it.

Midas on October 16, 2009 at 8:27 AM

I don’t believe “knowing its falsity” is the applicable standard for libel. If the writer wrote what he/she did “with a reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity”, then the piece will probably be found to be libelous.

As far as damages are concerned, I suspect a good lawyer would be able to convince a jury (under these circumstances) that the libelous comments in question were made with an intent to cause specific economic harm – i.e. destroying his opportunity to bid on an NFL franchise.

I guess it’ll really boil down to how far Rush wishes to pursue this thing. He appears to have a pretty good case…as well as some $$$$$ defendants. (That’s also good!)

alwyr on October 16, 2009 at 8:27 AM

Dave Rywall on October 15, 2009 at 11:09 PM

You’re just bitter because President Obama’s legislative accomplishments have been so pathetic so far.

BadgerHawk on October 16, 2009 at 8:54 AM

“Magic Negro” karma.

Decider on October 16, 2009 at 2:01 AM

Come on, dude. We spent like an hour going over this yesterday, and I thought we were making some pretty good progress. We’ll treat you like an adult and have intelligent debates as soon as you start acting like one.

If you want to continue being a dishonest smear merchant, that’s a reflection on you, not Limbaugh.

BadgerHawk on October 16, 2009 at 8:56 AM

To alwyr re post on October 16, 2009 at 8:27 AM:

“Actual malice” was defined in New York Times v. Sullivan to mean either knowledge of the statement’s falsity or reckless disregard of whether the statement is false or not. So, you are correct in criticizing Allahpundit for confining actual malice to just knowledge of falsity. In the case law since New York Times v. Sullivan, however, the reckless disregard branch of the actual malice standard has been often interpreted narrowly.

A libel case that Rush Limbaugh could bring would bring focus on what reckless disregard means. It is a good discussion to have whether the fabricated quotations about Rush, which were defamatory, should be actionable because they were published under circumstances satisfying the reckless disregard branch of the actual malice standard.

Phil Byler on October 16, 2009 at 9:04 AM

I don’t know the law, but Rush should keep firm pressure on all of these scumbags and bankrupt them in court if at all possible.

marklmail on October 16, 2009 at 9:07 AM

Dave Rywall on October 15, 2009 at 11:09 PM

You’re just bitter because President Obama’s legislative accomplishments have been so pathetic so far.

BadgerHawk on October 16, 2009 at 8:54 AM

Sorry BadgerHawk, must disagree… Drywall was a miserable bitter human long before Obama came on the seen. Drywall is a typical Liberal; angry, bitter, and miserable.

Keemo on October 16, 2009 at 9:10 AM

Rush sues, Rush owns CNN but calls it the Conservative News Network.

Kissmygrits on October 16, 2009 at 9:13 AM

From instapundit:

HMM: Limbaugh Targeted By Obama Official: “The plot thickens on the media’s character-lynching of Rush Limbaugh. Of the four stories run on ESPN.com about Limbaugh’s bid for the Rams (October 6, October 12, October 15, and another October 15) none of them mention that NFL Players Association Executive Director DeMaurice Smith served as counsel to Attorney General Eric Holder and was a member of Barack Obama’s transition team. The October 12 article references Smith’s anti-Limbaugh email meant to garner opposition against the radio host’s bid. The report refers to Smith only as the executive director of the NFLPA. Despite the fact that Smith’s opposition was based on Limbaugh’s political commentary, the report failed to mention that Smith’s political connections (including those to whom he donated thousands of dollars) have a vested interest in Limbaugh’s discrediting.”

Keemo on October 16, 2009 at 9:17 AM

Phooey!! go get ‘em Rush.

jeanie on October 16, 2009 at 9:35 AM

What irony. This story physically next to the one from Gibbs saying FNC does false stories.

barnone on October 16, 2009 at 9:56 AM

When duels were legal, scum like this knew not to impune a mans honor.

Bring back dueling and Congress and the news media improves immediately.

As a licensed gun owner, I practice weekly.

barnone on October 16, 2009 at 10:05 AM

What is this crap, “he’s still divisive” and the insinuations that he may not say these things but he believes them. Who are these idiots (democrats, I know) and why are they still being allowed to get away with this tripe?!? What I’m also seeing is a disturbing trend of black racists parading around the MSM and we should reject them just as strongly as any white supremist types. Rush may be rich and influential but this kind of slander and race-baiting should not be tolerated from anyone.

mozalf on October 16, 2009 at 10:39 AM

Yeah, I see libel suit incoming. You cannot print that shyte without checking it. You cant wait 24 to give the author a chance to provide provenance.

dogsoldier on October 16, 2009 at 10:43 AM

Proof that Limbaugh’s threat to sue people over this is being taken seriously? Eh, I doubt it. As I said before, it’s really hard for a public figure to prove defamation. He’d basically have to show that his accusers knew the quote was false and published it anyway

What if Limabaugh’s attorney notified them that the quotes was bogus and they went ahead repeating anyway ? Threat of a massive lawsuit, agains them and their networks is the only reason why they took it back.

I suspect, are motivated less by fear of being sued than as a lame nod to journalistic ethics.

You are a dreamer

runner on October 16, 2009 at 10:57 AM

In short, you are not human, you do not deserve respect, indeed deserve to be treated with active disrespect if you do not bow a knee to the leftist cant du jour.

E.g., the only safe topics of vicious ridicule are: religious Christians and conservatives. All others verboten.

spmat on October 16, 2009 at 11:02 AM

This will not be Rush’s only chance; they gave it all they had and ended up having to retract.

There’s always next time, and the time after that…

Queen0fCups on October 16, 2009 at 11:04 AM

CNN just lost. Just congratulate them for being on the bottom as bottom feeders. Even the National Enquirer has more credibility now. At least they got the Edwards story right. Just sayin’

elclynn on October 16, 2009 at 11:12 AM

Oops, our bad. 5 more yards.

spmat on October 16, 2009 at 11:15 AM

“Actual malice” was defined in New York Times v. Sullivan to mean either knowledge of the statement’s falsity or reckless disregard of whether the statement is false or not. So, you are correct in criticizing Allahpundit for confining actual malice to just knowledge of falsity. In the case law since New York Times v. Sullivan, however, the reckless disregard branch of the actual malice standard has been often interpreted narrowly.

If these fabricated “quotes” don’t meet the standard of “reckless disregard”, I don’t know what does.

The Monster on October 16, 2009 at 11:15 AM

mozalf @ 10:39
Shameful tactics by racists are always going to find the light of day. I don’t personally care which color of the spectrum they are, racists are garbage.

elclynn on October 16, 2009 at 11:18 AM

Keemo
Why does that not surprise me?

elclynn on October 16, 2009 at 11:20 AM

We’re not allowed to defend against LGF anymore?

Charles the lying liar gets to WIN?

Dude, that sucks.

BlueStateBilly on October 16, 2009 at 11:24 AM

It’s true that most people in the spotlight find it hard to sue for defamation. That usually is the case because they have to prove they actually lost something substantive and most rumors and lies about someone fail to draw a line between what lie and the loss.
In this case however, the line was clearly drawn for the false quotes and accusation of racism to Rush’s financial venture worth quite a substantial sum
Rush has a good case. He might not still win but he has a better chance than most.

LeeSeneca on October 16, 2009 at 11:36 AM

Again, the standard as I understand it for defamation of a public figure in the US is that the plantiff either has to show that the defendant knew the state was false when they made it or that they acted with malice or reckless disregard for the truth when they made the statement.

That’s a mighty tall hurdle.

SteveMG on October 15, 2009 at 9:50 PM

Taking anything off Wikipedia without verification, should count as reckless disregard for the truth

darktood on October 16, 2009 at 11:37 AM

“Magic Negro” karma.

Decider343 on October 16, 2009 at 2:01 AM

Translation: “I still can’t find any credible cites proving Limbaugh said anything bad.”

Del Dolemonte on October 16, 2009 at 11:54 AM

Rush was fired from the sports show he was on over that whole black successful quarterback analysis. It was just an analysis which they asked him for and he lost the gig over it.

johnnyU on October 16, 2009 at 8:12 AM

Another urban legend-he was never fired by ESPN, he resigned.

Del Dolemonte on October 16, 2009 at 11:58 AM

Rush just came on the air. You can actually hear for yourself what he believes. There is no password needed. Just tune your radio to a station that carries him.

daesleeper on October 16, 2009 at 12:08 PM

Guys and gals, did you just hear what Limbaugh said!! The director of the NFL players Association was a counselor to……..ERIC HOLDER! AAAAND HE WAS PART OF OBAMA’S TRANSITION TEAM!! Good grief!

Weight of Glory on October 16, 2009 at 12:11 PM

Sorry BadgerHawk, must disagree… Drywall was a miserable bitter human long before Obama came on the seen. Drywall is a typical Liberal; angry, bitter, and miserable.

Keemo on October 16, 2009 at 9:10 AM

The problem with liberals is, that they want everyone to be as miserable as they are.

Johan Klaus on October 16, 2009 at 12:15 PM

Er…the “mystery” about Olbermann? It was PATENTLY OBVIOUS.

Sheesh

KittyLowrey on October 16, 2009 at 12:19 PM

Ummm, rush is just about to spring a devious and dastardly plan upon us….. pay attention.

ted c on October 16, 2009 at 12:30 PM

The Master Plan to trick the SRM into dumping Obama: Endorse Obama’s policies! I’m dead weak!

uknowmorethanme on October 16, 2009 at 12:32 PM

And the Plan is supported by multiple studies cited on Wikipedia.

uknowmorethanme on October 16, 2009 at 12:33 PM

Sheer hilarity!

The media would sooner dump obama than agree with rush.

Choices!

ted c on October 16, 2009 at 12:39 PM

As I said before, it’s really hard for a public figure to prove defamation. He’d basically have to show that his accusers knew the quote was false and published it anyway;

I thought the scienter requirement was “reckless.” Even for public figures. Then again, I’m not sure and I’m too lazy to do the research.

exlibris on October 16, 2009 at 12:44 PM

SteveMG on October 15, 2009 at 9:50 PM

Oops–shoulda read the thread.

exlibris on October 16, 2009 at 12:46 PM

Anyone else just catch Snerdley absolutely destroy Rush’s critics?

BadgerHawk on October 16, 2009 at 1:18 PM

Why does free enterprise business wade into politics? Especially in the toxic race baiting atmosphere we’re all currently experiencing?

This alienates business in any equation no matter who the company is.

My husband and I have been Charger season ticket holders going on 8 years and my husband is literally in mourning. In 25 years of marriage I have never seen him go silent like this wanting me to sell, not give as we usually do when we can’t make a game but to sell this weeks tickets for the Broncos game. I can’t believe this because Football was the only outlet we both had to get away from the day to day hassles and for that conduit to be contaminated by politics is unbelievable as now it is.

This week’s tailgate parties are going to be very interesting, interesting indeed. Again you’re not going to see anything on MSM unless it’s something negative they can attach to the right. Count on it.

Tangerinesong

Tangerinesong on October 16, 2009 at 1:50 PM

Come on, dude. We spent like an hour going over this yesterday, and I thought we were making some pretty good progress. We’ll treat you like an adult and have intelligent debates as soon as you start acting like one.

If you want to continue being a dishonest smear merchant, that’s a reflection on you, not Limbaugh.

BadgerHawk on October 16, 2009 at 8:56 AM
Libtard troll Divider: (covering ears and closing eyes tight) NOT LISTENING LA LA LA LA LALAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!! NOT LISTENING!!!!!!

cableguy615 on October 16, 2009 at 3:06 PM

Blake you have still not posted a single link to prove any of your own assertions. I guess those quotes of me bashing HA were too hard to find?

You said you left LGF and weren’t banned, why not go log in and search my posts there and see if I bashed HA there? Oh, what? You really were banned? What, you’re off your medication?

That would explain your psychotic behavior.

DeathtotheSwiss on October 16, 2009 at 4:04 PM

Limbaugh’s bid ran into opposition within the league Tuesday when Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay vowed to vote against him. NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said the commentator’s “divisive” comments wouldn’t be tolerated from any NFL insider.

The quote is from a story displayed on the NFL website, here.

Given both the prominent posting and the content of the NFL Commissioner’s (and Jim Irsay’s) comments shouldn’t the NFL post an apology on their website?

Trochilus on October 16, 2009 at 6:09 PM

Same ugly, mean spirited, lying msm, dems tried to smear another of my hero’s saying that he raped and murdered a girl several years ago. Well, they couldn’t make that stick, so they will probably try something else.
I don’t think they are just wrong, I THINK THEY ARE EVIL….

Bambi on October 16, 2009 at 6:11 PM

Rev. Jeremiah Wright has been offered Rush’s seat at the table. G#D D#MN THE NFL!

Roy Rogers on October 16, 2009 at 6:28 PM

My husband and I have been Charger season ticket holders going on 8 years and my husband is literally in mourning. In 25 years of marriage I have never seen him go silent like this wanting me to sell, not give as we usually do when we can’t make a game but to sell this weeks tickets for the Broncos game. I can’t believe this because Football was the only outlet we both had to get away from the day to day hassles and for that conduit to be contaminated by politics is unbelievable as now it is.

Tangerinesong on October 16, 2009 at 1:50 PM

I’m not a football fan, but I understand how you feel about nothing, nothing being out of the reach of the tentacles of politics. I’ve even seen it in foodie articles. I’m as passionate about food as you and your hubby are about football — which probably means I’ll wind up shaped like one! A football, I mean. ;-)

I do have a suggestion: I don’t know if this will fill the hole, but in San Diego you have some excellent college football teams. (My husband’s cousin played for SDSU some years ago.) Maybe start packing those tailgate picnics to a college game?

Mary in LA on October 16, 2009 at 7:27 PM

http://www.veteranoutrage.com

why is it i cant make the TRUTHFUL comments about ohh
liberals and Islam without getting my ass sued off

But when they do it as long as they retract it within 72 hours well thats just fine and dandy..

veteranoutrage on October 16, 2009 at 9:34 PM

“Magic Negro” karma.

Decider on October 16, 2009 at 2:01 AM

Come on, dude. We spent like an hour going over this yesterday, and I thought we were making some pretty good progress. We’ll treat you like an adult and have intelligent debates as soon as you start acting like one.

If you want to continue being a dishonest smear merchant, that’s a reflection on you, not Limbaugh.

BadgerHawk on October 16, 2009 at 8:56 AM

Decider is certifiably dim.

CWforFreedom on October 16, 2009 at 11:08 PM

Rush paid a hefty price over his sports comment years ago when they tossed him off of a show AFTER he was ask his opinion and gave it on black successful quarterback desires of the NFL. Now, maybe ask the NFL what they are scripting the teams into and trying to force down our throats. I think thats what this is really about. Its about keeping Rush out of the NFL because he’ll be more active than the NFL can handle. The NFL therefore appears to be engaged in racial activity. Rush is a very smart man. He has the answers bfore he even tells us whats half going on. Rush, take your money and buy yourself a baseball team. Screw the NFL.

johnnyU on October 17, 2009 at 10:07 AM

actually, take the money you win from your libal suit and do it. Half a billion might be enough.

johnnyU on October 17, 2009 at 10:09 AM

This just in from the Rich Irony department:

George Clooney thinks something has gone wrong when the media prints celebrity rumor and innuendo as fact.

The star, a journalist’s son, said a news story used to require “two reliable sources, and that doesn’t seem to exist as much anymore.”

Clooney spoke Thursday at the London Film Festival, where one documentary in the lineup reveals how easily some newspapers can be duped into running fake stories about the famous.

The makers of “Starsuckers” fed false tips to British tabloids and then watched as some, though not all, ran them as legitimate news. The hoaxes included a story about Amy Winehouse’s trademark beehive hairdo catching fire.

“Starsuckers” director Chris Atkins said he “wanted to answer one simple question … How far will tabloid journalists go in the pursuit of their stories?” …

“The problem is that there’s so little reporting any more …. Somebody will write a story and it will be in 1,800 different outlets from one person’s story,” Clooney told reporters during a news conference to promote “The Men Who Stare at Goats,” a comedy about the U.S. military’s experiments with “psychic warfare.”

Paul_in_NJ on October 17, 2009 at 11:48 AM

The Source of the Rush Wiki edits has been tracked down to the ip of a Lefty Law Firm in NYC:

for the Wikipedia Libelist (important update)

TheBigOldDog on October 17, 2009 at 5:56 PM

The NFL is going to feel really, really needy when their profits drop like a stone in the coming year/s ahead.

Lourdes on October 17, 2009 at 7:38 PM

…The law firm linked to reports of an IP address associated with misleading and defamatory attacks on Rush Limbaugh was a major source of campaign funds for Barack Obama.

FEC records* indicate that individuals associated with Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler, LLC donated almost $100,000 to Obama’s 2008 campaign. Over the last ten years people associated with the firm donated another $80,000 dollars to the Democratic Party and thousands more to Democrats across the country, literally, from Oregon to Florida. Thousands more went to such radical left organizations as Emily’s List and MoveOn.org.

While a small number of other individuals donated a, not insubstantial, amount to Republican candidates over the past decade, those donations went to mainstream candidates and organizations and not to the extremist fringe–such as the leftists at George Soros funded MoveOn…

Lourdes on October 17, 2009 at 7:41 PM

This just in from the Rich Irony department:

George Clooney thinks something has gone wrong when the media prints celebrity rumor and innuendo as fact.

Combining that ^^ with the recent attempts by James Carville and Alec Baldwin to “speak courting words” about Conservatives and Republicans, respectively, seems far too newly-bourne nice. I think it’s more of the Leftwing attempting to dampen the flames that are underway in the Left’s credibility.

Lourdes on October 17, 2009 at 7:43 PM

To H#LL with the NFL.

ronnyraygun on October 18, 2009 at 8:28 AM

And LittleGreenFootballs as well.

ronnyraygun on October 18, 2009 at 9:43 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4