<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fox News poll: Only 43% would vote to reelect Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 11:37:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Will Follow? &#8212; The New Clarion</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2843763</link>
		<dc:creator>What Will Follow? &#8212; The New Clarion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2843763</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama. She says a majority of independents want less government intervention in the economy. A Fox News Poll says only 43% would vote today to reelect President [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obama. She says a majority of independents want less government intervention in the economy. A Fox News Poll says only 43% would vote today to reelect President [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cybergeezer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2840596</link>
		<dc:creator>Cybergeezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2840596</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Obama&#039;s plan to force people to welfare: Story here:&lt;/strong&gt;
http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/16/morning-bell-obamacare-puts-you-on-welfare/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Obama&#8217;s plan to force people to welfare: Story here:</strong><br />
<a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/16/morning-bell-obamacare-puts-you-on-welfare/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/16/morning-bell-obamacare-puts-you-on-welfare/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angryed</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839982</link>
		<dc:creator>angryed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839982</guid>
		<description>150 comments in...don&#039;t feel like reading them all....if someone else said it

43% + 8% ACORN vote = win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>150 comments in&#8230;don&#8217;t feel like reading them all&#8230;.if someone else said it</p>
<p>43% + 8% ACORN vote = win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technopeasant</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839913</link>
		<dc:creator>technopeasant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839913</guid>
		<description>Rasmussen daily tracking poll:

-11 (28-39) strongly approve-strongly disapprove

-4(47-51) approval-disapproval

First day at 47 approval since Sept 17 and has been between 47 and 52 approval every day for 6 weeks.

Per Rasmussen, Obama did not get a Nobel peace prize bounce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rasmussen daily tracking poll:</p>
<p>-11 (28-39) strongly approve-strongly disapprove</p>
<p>-4(47-51) approval-disapproval</p>
<p>First day at 47 approval since Sept 17 and has been between 47 and 52 approval every day for 6 weeks.</p>
<p>Per Rasmussen, Obama did not get a Nobel peace prize bounce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Grump</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839827</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Grump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839827</guid>
		<description>I was going to compare the Obamas to the Jeffersons, but after giving it some thought, I remembered that for all of his inane buffonery, the character George Jefferson worked and paid for everything the family had.

The Obamas are just another black family in public housing, except for their million dollar house in Chicago, which we can&#039;t search the title on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to compare the Obamas to the Jeffersons, but after giving it some thought, I remembered that for all of his inane buffonery, the character George Jefferson worked and paid for everything the family had.</p>
<p>The Obamas are just another black family in public housing, except for their million dollar house in Chicago, which we can&#8217;t search the title on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: COACHEP &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Posts about Obama Health Care Failure as of October 16, 2009</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839803</link>
		<dc:creator>COACHEP &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Posts about Obama Health Care Failure as of October 16, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839803</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Buyers Remorse: 43% of Voters Say they Would Reelect Barack Obama in 2012 &#124; Scared Monkeys</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839802</link>
		<dc:creator>American Buyers Remorse: 43% of Voters Say they Would Reelect Barack Obama in 2012 &#124; Scared Monkeys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839802</guid>
		<description>[...] Hot Air points out that Obama&#8217;s approval numbers on the economy, Iran, Health care and Afghanistan are terrible. The key is the economy and the unemployment number. However, if Democrats ram through Obamacare with a nuclear option &#8230; the tidal wave against Obama and Democrats may be insurmountable to recover from.   Share This [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hot Air points out that Obama&rsquo;s approval numbers on the economy, Iran, Health care and Afghanistan are terrible. The key is the economy and the unemployment number. However, if Democrats ram through Obamacare with a nuclear option &hellip; the tidal wave against Obama and Democrats may be insurmountable to recover from.   Share This [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Strata-Sphere &#187; President&#8217;s &#38; Congress&#8217; Poll Numbers Collapsing</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839661</link>
		<dc:creator>The Strata-Sphere &#187; President&#8217;s &#38; Congress&#8217; Poll Numbers Collapsing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839661</guid>
		<description>[...] make matters even worse, Congress seems uncaring as to the public&#8217;s concerns on health care. Ed Morrissey has more highlights, including negatives on policies like health care and economy. He also has these two [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] make matters even worse, Congress seems uncaring as to the public&#8217;s concerns on health care. Ed Morrissey has more highlights, including negatives on policies like health care and economy. He also has these two [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health Care BS - RECOVERY? ARE YOU KIDDING ME?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839645</link>
		<dc:creator>Health Care BS - RECOVERY? ARE YOU KIDDING ME?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839645</guid>
		<description>[...] is why polls are showing that Obama couldn&#8217;t get re-elected if voters had to choose today. If these numbers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is why polls are showing that Obama couldn&#8217;t get re-elected if voters had to choose today. If these numbers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technopeasant</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839644</link>
		<dc:creator>technopeasant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839644</guid>
		<description>Gallup just came out with F/UF on Sarah Palin:
                             F             UF
SARAH PALIN                 40             50
DEMS                        14             72
REP                         69             25
INDY                        41             48

1013 ADULTS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gallup just came out with F/UF on Sarah Palin:<br />
                             F             UF<br />
SARAH PALIN                 40             50<br />
DEMS                        14             72<br />
REP                         69             25<br />
INDY                        41             48</p>
<p>1013 ADULTS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technopeasant</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839643</link>
		<dc:creator>technopeasant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839643</guid>
		<description>gary4205 on October 16, 2009 at 4:02 AM

I predict a 15 round heavyweight championship of the world, a bare-knuckle brawl in the center of the ring where Obama will not escape unscathed. Sarah will land many telling blows and open wounds. It will be a fight to the finish. Sarah will never give up. 

Obama could still win with a crooked referee in his corner and judges that have been bribed. Sarah will have to knock the Messiah out to win IMHO. Will the referee (the MSM) prevent him from getting knocked out? We&#039;ll know in 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gary4205 on October 16, 2009 at 4:02 AM</p>
<p>I predict a 15 round heavyweight championship of the world, a bare-knuckle brawl in the center of the ring where Obama will not escape unscathed. Sarah will land many telling blows and open wounds. It will be a fight to the finish. Sarah will never give up. </p>
<p>Obama could still win with a crooked referee in his corner and judges that have been bribed. Sarah will have to knock the Messiah out to win IMHO. Will the referee (the MSM) prevent him from getting knocked out? We&#8217;ll know in 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary4205</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839610</link>
		<dc:creator>gary4205</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839610</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;technopeasant on October 16, 2009 at 1:57 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;


I guess I&#039;m just more optimistic. I&#039;ve been &quot;all in&quot; for Palin since I first heard about her several years ago. I was convinced she was going to be in the White House some day. 

I hear you about the butterfly though. Frankly I think we are seeing that now. She is such a fast learner that she has grown incredibly in the last couple of years. 

She simply blows you away. 

But here&#039;s what I see, and why I see it. I see Sarah having a tough, but relatively fast past to the nomination. Sarah has things money can&#039;t buy, and schools can&#039;t teach you. First, she has charisma, REAL charisma out the ying yang. She immediately draws you in. She grabs your attention. 

Sarah has a instinct for politics that one rarely sees. She is just a natural at this. She&#039;s like a really good chess player who not only sees his move, but what your counter will be, and then his next, and so on. In other words, two or three plays ahead of the competition. 

And of course, she has common sense, something totally lacking among the &quot;elites&quot; in our society. 

With ObamaCare, I just can&#039;t see Romney being able to shake his folly with MittensCare. He can blame the mess on the democrats &quot;ruining his baby,&quot; but the fact that he didn&#039;t see that coming is all you need to know about him. 

And Huckabee ain&#039;t gonna get it done. His ego will make him run, but it ain&#039;t gonna happen. 

I think Pawlenty will actually be more of a challenge, because he will end up being the media&#039;s golden boy. He&#039;s just so John McCain they won&#039;t be able to stop themselves. 

In the end, this will give Sarah a chance to debate and debate hard, and that&#039;s what we want. If she wins the nomination too easy, which she might, it&#039;ll look like she had no competition to challenge her. If she has a good old knock down drag out deal, it&#039;ll prove she is who WE know she is. Plus it&#039;ll just be fun to watch! 

I think you could run a set of toenail clippers in 2012 and beat Obama. But Palin won&#039;t just beat him, she will win big, giving her a real mandate to deconstruct decades of Washington&#039;s mistakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>technopeasant on October 16, 2009 at 1:57 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I guess I&#8217;m just more optimistic. I&#8217;ve been &#8220;all in&#8221; for Palin since I first heard about her several years ago. I was convinced she was going to be in the White House some day. </p>
<p>I hear you about the butterfly though. Frankly I think we are seeing that now. She is such a fast learner that she has grown incredibly in the last couple of years. </p>
<p>She simply blows you away. </p>
<p>But here&#8217;s what I see, and why I see it. I see Sarah having a tough, but relatively fast past to the nomination. Sarah has things money can&#8217;t buy, and schools can&#8217;t teach you. First, she has charisma, REAL charisma out the ying yang. She immediately draws you in. She grabs your attention. </p>
<p>Sarah has a instinct for politics that one rarely sees. She is just a natural at this. She&#8217;s like a really good chess player who not only sees his move, but what your counter will be, and then his next, and so on. In other words, two or three plays ahead of the competition. </p>
<p>And of course, she has common sense, something totally lacking among the &#8220;elites&#8221; in our society. </p>
<p>With ObamaCare, I just can&#8217;t see Romney being able to shake his folly with MittensCare. He can blame the mess on the democrats &#8220;ruining his baby,&#8221; but the fact that he didn&#8217;t see that coming is all you need to know about him. </p>
<p>And Huckabee ain&#8217;t gonna get it done. His ego will make him run, but it ain&#8217;t gonna happen. </p>
<p>I think Pawlenty will actually be more of a challenge, because he will end up being the media&#8217;s golden boy. He&#8217;s just so John McCain they won&#8217;t be able to stop themselves. </p>
<p>In the end, this will give Sarah a chance to debate and debate hard, and that&#8217;s what we want. If she wins the nomination too easy, which she might, it&#8217;ll look like she had no competition to challenge her. If she has a good old knock down drag out deal, it&#8217;ll prove she is who WE know she is. Plus it&#8217;ll just be fun to watch! </p>
<p>I think you could run a set of toenail clippers in 2012 and beat Obama. But Palin won&#8217;t just beat him, she will win big, giving her a real mandate to deconstruct decades of Washington&#8217;s mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xblade</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839598</link>
		<dc:creator>xblade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 07:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839598</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;—– shakes head…. tis a strange new world every day now…

doriangrey &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Seriously....when did CJ get moderator privileges here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&lt;—– shakes head…. tis a strange new world every day now…</p>
<p>doriangrey </p></blockquote>
<p>Seriously&#8230;.when did CJ get moderator privileges here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xblade</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839593</link>
		<dc:creator>xblade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 07:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839593</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Sarah will not only be the nominee, she will win.

wildcat84&lt;/blockquote&gt;

She may win something, but it won&#039;t be the White House. Any shot we may have will be killed by her nomination.

It&#039;s moot anyway. The economy will be just fine come 2012, not because of Obama but despite him. As a result, brotha man will cruise to re-election. To not re-elect him would be racist, and the media will be sure to let everyone know. And just like 2008, plenty of wet-noodle independents will bend over for the chocolate enema because they&#039;re afraid someone will think badly of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Sarah will not only be the nominee, she will win.</p>
<p>wildcat84</p></blockquote>
<p>She may win something, but it won&#8217;t be the White House. Any shot we may have will be killed by her nomination.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s moot anyway. The economy will be just fine come 2012, not because of Obama but despite him. As a result, brotha man will cruise to re-election. To not re-elect him would be racist, and the media will be sure to let everyone know. And just like 2008, plenty of wet-noodle independents will bend over for the chocolate enema because they&#8217;re afraid someone will think badly of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technopeasant</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839550</link>
		<dc:creator>technopeasant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 05:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839550</guid>
		<description>gary4205 on October 16, 2009 at 9:46 PM
wildcat on October 16, 2009 at 10:42 PM

I think we have a long way to go before Sarah become the GOP nominee in 2012. I have watched enough sports and politics to understand the peaks and valleys of competition and how the presence of setbacks and pitfalls can throw a team for a loop or a campaign off the rails. Upsets or dark horses happen in politics as well as in sports.

Thus I will not commit to Sarah being the GOP nominee in 2012 but I will say that I am 90% sure it will either be Romney, Huckabee or Palin unless one of them does not run. Then that would open the door for a dark horse like Pawlenty or somebody else.

Now why do I think that way. Yes it is 2 years to the primary debates but if one is to be successful in presidential politics in the 21st c one must have started planning for a serious run no later than 2 years out from January 2012 which would put it at January 2010. Look at what happened to Fred Thompson when he tried to short-cut the process. It&#039;s like a boxer who thinks he can slack off training for a fight because of his experience and then gets his ass handed to him by a fighter who &quot;paid his dues&quot;.

Why I am so impressed with Sarah Palin is because I really believe she gets it, that there are no short cuts to success, the making a serious run at the presidency in the 21st is a long-term commitment that involves first getting your ducks in a row, then building the infrastructure of a campaign gradually one piece at a time in a very methodical, efficient manner, and then using her book as a passport to go on the road to start making her case to the jury (American voters)as she builds up more credibility along the way and yes LEGITIMIZES her claims to be a leader of the GOP and a frontrunner for the nomination.

The latter is still up in the air. It&#039;s called performance and execution. &quot;That&#039;s why they play the game&quot;.

But I will say this if Palin can get to September 2010 relatively unscathed and &quot;ready for bear&quot; I do believe that in the 60 days leading up the 2010 midterms we might before our eyes be witnessing the transformation of a caterpillar into a butterfly.

Sarah is in good shape and poised to be one of the two finalists for the GOP nomination in 2012, and this far out that is not a bad spot to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gary4205 on October 16, 2009 at 9:46 PM<br />
wildcat on October 16, 2009 at 10:42 PM</p>
<p>I think we have a long way to go before Sarah become the GOP nominee in 2012. I have watched enough sports and politics to understand the peaks and valleys of competition and how the presence of setbacks and pitfalls can throw a team for a loop or a campaign off the rails. Upsets or dark horses happen in politics as well as in sports.</p>
<p>Thus I will not commit to Sarah being the GOP nominee in 2012 but I will say that I am 90% sure it will either be Romney, Huckabee or Palin unless one of them does not run. Then that would open the door for a dark horse like Pawlenty or somebody else.</p>
<p>Now why do I think that way. Yes it is 2 years to the primary debates but if one is to be successful in presidential politics in the 21st c one must have started planning for a serious run no later than 2 years out from January 2012 which would put it at January 2010. Look at what happened to Fred Thompson when he tried to short-cut the process. It&#8217;s like a boxer who thinks he can slack off training for a fight because of his experience and then gets his ass handed to him by a fighter who &#8220;paid his dues&#8221;.</p>
<p>Why I am so impressed with Sarah Palin is because I really believe she gets it, that there are no short cuts to success, the making a serious run at the presidency in the 21st is a long-term commitment that involves first getting your ducks in a row, then building the infrastructure of a campaign gradually one piece at a time in a very methodical, efficient manner, and then using her book as a passport to go on the road to start making her case to the jury (American voters)as she builds up more credibility along the way and yes LEGITIMIZES her claims to be a leader of the GOP and a frontrunner for the nomination.</p>
<p>The latter is still up in the air. It&#8217;s called performance and execution. &#8220;That&#8217;s why they play the game&#8221;.</p>
<p>But I will say this if Palin can get to September 2010 relatively unscathed and &#8220;ready for bear&#8221; I do believe that in the 60 days leading up the 2010 midterms we might before our eyes be witnessing the transformation of a caterpillar into a butterfly.</p>
<p>Sarah is in good shape and poised to be one of the two finalists for the GOP nomination in 2012, and this far out that is not a bad spot to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Decider</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839510</link>
		<dc:creator>Decider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 05:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839510</guid>
		<description>In a Fox News poll, Dick Morris is considered a &quot;Democrat&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a Fox News poll, Dick Morris is considered a &#8220;Democrat&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mojave Mark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839503</link>
		<dc:creator>Mojave Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 05:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839503</guid>
		<description>The ones who approve don&#039;t do so because of results but because he&#039;s &quot;trying.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ones who approve don&#8217;t do so because of results but because he&#8217;s &#8220;trying.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDPerren</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839437</link>
		<dc:creator>JDPerren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 04:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839437</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s scary that 48% of those polled approve of Obama&#039;s efforts vis-a-vis the economy. It only goes to show that there are an enormous number of Americans who have absolutely no clue when it comes to economics and policy. Sort of like Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s scary that 48% of those polled approve of Obama&#8217;s efforts vis-a-vis the economy. It only goes to show that there are an enormous number of Americans who have absolutely no clue when it comes to economics and policy. Sort of like Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khun Joe</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839430</link>
		<dc:creator>Khun Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 04:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839430</guid>
		<description>Nuclear option = Thelma and Louise ending in 2010 for Dems!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nuclear option = Thelma and Louise ending in 2010 for Dems!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Only 43% of those polled would vote to re-elect Obama as President if the election was held today &#124; Fire Andrea Mitchell!</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839325</link>
		<dc:creator>Only 43% of those polled would vote to re-elect Obama as President if the election was held today &#124; Fire Andrea Mitchell!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839325</guid>
		<description>[...] on April 22-23 when this poll was first conducted, 52% of those polled said they would re-elect Obama if the election was held today. Fast forward to October 15th, and those 52% has dropped to a new low of 43% who would vote to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on April 22-23 when this poll was first conducted, 52% of those polled said they would re-elect Obama if the election was held today. Fast forward to October 15th, and those 52% has dropped to a new low of 43% who would vote to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: red26</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839267</link>
		<dc:creator>red26</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839267</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;However, if the economy improves enough and soon enough, and there are no catastrophic events that are obviously Obama’s fault, Barry is going to be very tough to beat. He has so many major sectors of the culture working for him, news, entertainment, teaching, unions, and the wine and cheese set.&lt;/blockquote&gt; I totally agree. But we&#039;d have a much better shot if Murdoch ever got NBC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>However, if the economy improves enough and soon enough, and there are no catastrophic events that are obviously Obama’s fault, Barry is going to be very tough to beat. He has so many major sectors of the culture working for him, news, entertainment, teaching, unions, and the wine and cheese set.</p></blockquote>
<p> I totally agree. But we&#8217;d have a much better shot if Murdoch ever got NBC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HondaV65</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839262</link>
		<dc:creator>HondaV65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839262</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; I hope you’re wrong. I can deal with the other ones losing, but i’ll go crazy when she loses. Even this past election was easier to handle because I didn’t like McCain.

red26 on October 15, 2009 at 10:07 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well ... the goal is to win. ;)

And ... as long as the Tea Party folks take the GOP next year ... 


We will win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> I hope you’re wrong. I can deal with the other ones losing, but i’ll go crazy when she loses. Even this past election was easier to handle because I didn’t like McCain.</p>
<p>red26 on October 15, 2009 at 10:07 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Well &#8230; the goal is to win. ;)</p>
<p>And &#8230; as long as the Tea Party folks take the GOP next year &#8230; </p>
<p>We will win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HondaV65</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839256</link>
		<dc:creator>HondaV65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839256</guid>
		<description>These numbers come only 10 months after dude took the helm.

They WILL get worse by November, 2010.  A lot worse.  If we get attacked by terrorists - they will get even worse.  If Israel is attacked by Iran or Iran gets nukes or Israel is forced to attack Iran and Iran throws a hissy ...

It gets worse for Obama.

If anything difficult happens while he&#039;s sitting in the office - the numbers get worse because he will botch the handling on any crisis that appears before him no matter how simple and elementary the solution may be to it.

Why?  Because we have an idiot in the Oval Office who can be relied upon to do one thing consistently ...

screw up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These numbers come only 10 months after dude took the helm.</p>
<p>They WILL get worse by November, 2010.  A lot worse.  If we get attacked by terrorists &#8211; they will get even worse.  If Israel is attacked by Iran or Iran gets nukes or Israel is forced to attack Iran and Iran throws a hissy &#8230;</p>
<p>It gets worse for Obama.</p>
<p>If anything difficult happens while he&#8217;s sitting in the office &#8211; the numbers get worse because he will botch the handling on any crisis that appears before him no matter how simple and elementary the solution may be to it.</p>
<p>Why?  Because we have an idiot in the Oval Office who can be relied upon to do one thing consistently &#8230;</p>
<p>screw up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wildcat84</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839186</link>
		<dc:creator>wildcat84</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839186</guid>
		<description>Meggie Mac blow up dolls would probably travel 50 miles across Colorado.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meggie Mac blow up dolls would probably travel 50 miles across Colorado.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clyde5445</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/fox-news-poll-only-43-would-vote-to-reelect-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-2839184</link>
		<dc:creator>Clyde5445</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=69228#comment-2839184</guid>
		<description>If I am not mistaken something very big well blow up O&#039;s ecomemy around Jan. 2011. The Bush tax cuts end. End of Story. 

Now something for Allah it looks like Gallup is going to release a poll on Gov. Palin. Allah you better get you Meghan blow up doll ready better yet check out her twitpic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I am not mistaken something very big well blow up O&#8217;s ecomemy around Jan. 2011. The Bush tax cuts end. End of Story. </p>
<p>Now something for Allah it looks like Gallup is going to release a poll on Gov. Palin. Allah you better get you Meghan blow up doll ready better yet check out her twitpic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
