<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary: No, no, no, I&#8217;m not running again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 11:24:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hillary: I probably won&#8217;t serve two terms as Secretary of State</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-2/#comment-3192661</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hillary: I probably won&#8217;t serve two terms as Secretary of State</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-3192661</guid>
		<description>[...] no interest&#8221; in running again, she says, which in fairness is the same answer she gave back in October. Ace is skeptical about her denials, but come on: How exactly is Her Majesty going to reposition [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] no interest&#8221; in running again, she says, which in fairness is the same answer she gave back in October. Ace is skeptical about her denials, but come on: How exactly is Her Majesty going to reposition [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cjk</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2828957</link>
		<dc:creator>cjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2828957</guid>
		<description>She&#039;s telling the truth this time. It would be political suicide for any demorat to challenge obama(pbuh).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s telling the truth this time. It would be political suicide for any demorat to challenge obama(pbuh).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crazy_legs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2827859</link>
		<dc:creator>crazy_legs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2827859</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t Hillary say she wasn&#039;t going to run in 2008?  That she was more interested in representing the people of New York than in running for President?  Look at how well that turned out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t Hillary say she wasn&#8217;t going to run in 2008?  That she was more interested in representing the people of New York than in running for President?  Look at how well that turned out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Fader</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2827787</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Fader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2827787</guid>
		<description>As with so many of Bill Clinton&#039;s conquests, when she says &quot;no&quot;, she really means &quot;yes&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with so many of Bill Clinton&#8217;s conquests, when she says &#8220;no&#8221;, she really means &#8220;yes&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Z</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2827361</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2827361</guid>
		<description>Hillary (in 2008): Senator Obama&#039;s foreign policy is dangerous and naive. 

I&#039;m no fan of Hillary Clinton, but she had THAT right. The American Left didn&#039;t listen to her then, and voted for HopeyChange, but the people of Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India were listening, the honest ones with trepidation, and the troublemakers with delight. 

Obama fiddles while Afghanistan falls and Iran builds a nuke...chances are Hillary will bail out of the Administration like a rat from a sinking ship, to save whatever credibility she has left, and run in 2012. If the Democrats lose the House in 2010, they might realize they made a huge mistake with Obama, and rally around Hillary (and Bill) Clinton in order to save the party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary (in 2008): Senator Obama&#8217;s foreign policy is dangerous and naive. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m no fan of Hillary Clinton, but she had THAT right. The American Left didn&#8217;t listen to her then, and voted for HopeyChange, but the people of Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India were listening, the honest ones with trepidation, and the troublemakers with delight. </p>
<p>Obama fiddles while Afghanistan falls and Iran builds a nuke&#8230;chances are Hillary will bail out of the Administration like a rat from a sinking ship, to save whatever credibility she has left, and run in 2012. If the Democrats lose the House in 2010, they might realize they made a huge mistake with Obama, and rally around Hillary (and Bill) Clinton in order to save the party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AllahPundit gets it wrong &#124; Political Byline</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2827302</link>
		<dc:creator>AllahPundit gets it wrong &#124; Political Byline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2827302</guid>
		<description>[...] via Hot Air » Blog Archive » Hillary: No, no, no, I’m not running again. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Hot Air » Blog Archive » Hillary: No, no, no, I’m not running again. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AllahPundit gets it wrong &#124; Political Byline</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2827301</link>
		<dc:creator>AllahPundit gets it wrong &#124; Political Byline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2827301</guid>
		<description>[...] via Hot Air » Blog Archive » Hillary: No, no, no, I’m not running again. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Hot Air » Blog Archive » Hillary: No, no, no, I’m not running again. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kissmygrits</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2827299</link>
		<dc:creator>Kissmygrits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2827299</guid>
		<description>Go ahead and start the retirement now.  Go away and stay away and take the philanderer in chief with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go ahead and start the retirement now.  Go away and stay away and take the philanderer in chief with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onlineanalyst</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-2/#comment-2827239</link>
		<dc:creator>onlineanalyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2827239</guid>
		<description>A battle between the Grifters and the Jeffersons?  Snort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A battle between the Grifters and the Jeffersons?  Snort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff from WI</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2827108</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff from WI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2827108</guid>
		<description>This old bag Hillary will be the Helen Thomas of candidates. She&#039;ll be there for decades trying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This old bag Hillary will be the Helen Thomas of candidates. She&#8217;ll be there for decades trying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right2bright</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2827092</link>
		<dc:creator>right2bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2827092</guid>
		<description>This is a small thing, but it really bugs me.  The media keep using the word &quot;troop&quot; when talking about men being killed, not the word soldier.
It is done on purpose, they aren&#039;t &quot;troops&quot; troops are groups of men, a unit.
So when they say several troops were killed, they are actually saying 30, 40, 60 men?  No they are trying not to say &quot;soldiers&quot;  or &quot;men&quot;, they are de-humanizing the loss.
MSM.....troops are groups of soldiers as a unit, of maybe ten or so, like a patrol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a small thing, but it really bugs me.  The media keep using the word &#8220;troop&#8221; when talking about men being killed, not the word soldier.<br />
It is done on purpose, they aren&#8217;t &#8220;troops&#8221; troops are groups of men, a unit.<br />
So when they say several troops were killed, they are actually saying 30, 40, 60 men?  No they are trying not to say &#8220;soldiers&#8221;  or &#8220;men&#8221;, they are de-humanizing the loss.<br />
MSM&#8230;..troops are groups of soldiers as a unit, of maybe ten or so, like a patrol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bradley11</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2827036</link>
		<dc:creator>bradley11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2827036</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ll know if this empty pantsuit will be running for president in 2012 easily enough: if she resigns as secretary of state early in 2011. If she perceives Obama to be vulnerable in 2012, she&#039;ll go for it. It&#039;s her only remaining chance, she&#039;ll be nearly 70 in 2016. The Democratic Party? She&#039;ll say she&#039;s running to &quot;save it&quot;. She&#039;s the guest that wouldn&#039;t leave. Cackle, cackle, cackle. &quot;Look out! Snipers!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll know if this empty pantsuit will be running for president in 2012 easily enough: if she resigns as secretary of state early in 2011. If she perceives Obama to be vulnerable in 2012, she&#8217;ll go for it. It&#8217;s her only remaining chance, she&#8217;ll be nearly 70 in 2016. The Democratic Party? She&#8217;ll say she&#8217;s running to &#8220;save it&#8221;. She&#8217;s the guest that wouldn&#8217;t leave. Cackle, cackle, cackle. &#8220;Look out! Snipers!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe btfsplk</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2827008</link>
		<dc:creator>joe btfsplk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2827008</guid>
		<description>The real answer will be visible when Hill&#039;s gets a frame-off, whole  body restoration to present a &quot;fresh and bright&quot; package.  This could take a while........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real answer will be visible when Hill&#8217;s gets a frame-off, whole  body restoration to present a &#8220;fresh and bright&#8221; package.  This could take a while&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. ZhivBlago</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2826980</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. ZhivBlago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2826980</guid>
		<description>Why would she run?  The same DNC elitists that brought the &quot;glass ceiling&quot; down on her head the last time won&#039;t let her interfere with their real Socialist agenda.  

They&#039;re impatient and were over the Clintoons long ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would she run?  The same DNC elitists that brought the &#8220;glass ceiling&#8221; down on her head the last time won&#8217;t let her interfere with their real Socialist agenda.  </p>
<p>They&#8217;re impatient and were over the Clintoons long ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaime</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2826941</link>
		<dc:creator>jaime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2826941</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Dude, she’s totally running — albeit certainly not in 2012...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t know.  Jimmy Carter was such a fuck-up that his approval ratings were in the mid-20s in late 1979, before the Iran hostage situation.  Ted Kennedy announced his candidacy in November.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Dude, she’s totally running — albeit certainly not in 2012&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t know.  Jimmy Carter was such a fuck-up that his approval ratings were in the mid-20s in late 1979, before the Iran hostage situation.  Ted Kennedy announced his candidacy in November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: progressoverpeace</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2826731</link>
		<dc:creator>progressoverpeace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2826731</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Because she might be remembered for being that and not the wife of an impeached President whose impeachment was the result of lying about an extramarital affair.

bloggless on October 12, 2009 at 9:21 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I thought that her unbelievably embarrassing &#039;reset&#039; idiocy, displayed so publicly in front of the whole world, did that.  I still can&#039;t believe it.  I never had much respect for her intellect (though that &quot;Primary Colors&quot; movie painted a picture of a very competent, if twisted, thinker) but that &#039;reset&#039; fiasco just blew me away.  That was even dumber than most of the things The Precedent has done, which is no mean feat. A little nostalgia:

&lt;blockquote&gt;GENEVA, March 6 (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton presented Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov with a red &quot;reset button&quot; to symbolise improved ties, but the gift drew smiles as the word &quot;reset&quot; was mistranslated into the Russian for &quot;overcharge&quot;.

&quot;I would like to present you with a little gift that represents what President Obama and Vice President Biden and I have been saying and that is: &#039;We want to reset our relationship and so we will do it together,&quot; said Clinton, presenting Lavrov with a palm-sized yellow box with a red button.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lastampa.it/redazione/cmssezioni/esteri/200903images/hillary03G.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Clinton joked to Lavrov: &quot;We worked hard to get the right Russian word. Do you think we got it?&quot;

&quot;You got it wrong,&quot; said Lavrov, smiling as the two pushed the reset button together before dinner at a Geneva hotel.&lt;/a&gt;

He told Clinton the word &quot;Peregruzka&quot; meant &quot;overcharge&quot;, to which Clinton replied: &quot;We won&#039;t let you do that to us.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I still laugh whenever I read that.  The whole friggin&#039; State Department.  ...

I think she&#039;s trying to escape from the &#039;reset&#039; moment, now (imagine the ads you would run - the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHVEDq6RVXc&amp;feature=related&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sniper dodging&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lastampa.it/redazione/cmssezioni/esteri/200903images/hillary03G.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&#039;reset&#039;&lt;/a&gt;).

Shrillary is toast, but she&#039;s just dumb enough to run again, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Because she might be remembered for being that and not the wife of an impeached President whose impeachment was the result of lying about an extramarital affair.</p>
<p>bloggless on October 12, 2009 at 9:21 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I thought that her unbelievably embarrassing &#8216;reset&#8217; idiocy, displayed so publicly in front of the whole world, did that.  I still can&#8217;t believe it.  I never had much respect for her intellect (though that &#8220;Primary Colors&#8221; movie painted a picture of a very competent, if twisted, thinker) but that &#8216;reset&#8217; fiasco just blew me away.  That was even dumber than most of the things The Precedent has done, which is no mean feat. A little nostalgia:</p>
<blockquote><p>GENEVA, March 6 (Reuters) &#8211; U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton presented Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov with a red &#8220;reset button&#8221; to symbolise improved ties, but the gift drew smiles as the word &#8220;reset&#8221; was mistranslated into the Russian for &#8220;overcharge&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;I would like to present you with a little gift that represents what President Obama and Vice President Biden and I have been saying and that is: &#8216;We want to reset our relationship and so we will do it together,&#8221; said Clinton, presenting Lavrov with a palm-sized yellow box with a red button.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lastampa.it/redazione/cmssezioni/esteri/200903images/hillary03G.jpg" rel="nofollow">Clinton joked to Lavrov: &#8220;We worked hard to get the right Russian word. Do you think we got it?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;You got it wrong,&#8221; said Lavrov, smiling as the two pushed the reset button together before dinner at a Geneva hotel.</a></p>
<p>He told Clinton the word &#8220;Peregruzka&#8221; meant &#8220;overcharge&#8221;, to which Clinton replied: &#8220;We won&#8217;t let you do that to us.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I still laugh whenever I read that.  The whole friggin&#8217; State Department.  &#8230;</p>
<p>I think she&#8217;s trying to escape from the &#8216;reset&#8217; moment, now (imagine the ads you would run &#8211; the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHVEDq6RVXc&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">sniper dodging</a> and the <a href="http://www.lastampa.it/redazione/cmssezioni/esteri/200903images/hillary03G.jpg" rel="nofollow">&#8216;reset&#8217;</a>).</p>
<p>Shrillary is toast, but she&#8217;s just dumb enough to run again, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Treacher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2826673</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Treacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2826673</guid>
		<description>So she&#039;s definitely running again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So she&#8217;s definitely running again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TN Mom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2826636</link>
		<dc:creator>TN Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2826636</guid>
		<description>Party Unity My A$$; she is soooo running!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Party Unity My A$$; she is soooo running!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yogi41</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2826543</link>
		<dc:creator>yogi41</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2826543</guid>
		<description>Never, ever underestimate a Clinton’s ability to gather and disseminate as much dirt as possible on a potential enemy. &lt;blockquote&gt;She knows where the bodies are buried - and if there aren’t any bodies, she knows who to call to get some. The one thing I can say about Billy Jeff and his bride…they lie,they cheat, they’re total thugs - but they’re very, very good at it.
I promise you, she’s taking notes on ol’ Barry. If she wanted to run in 2012, she’d know exactly where his vulnerabilities were, and how to exploit them to her advantage. I would put nothing, at all, past her.

uncivilized on October 12, 2009 at 10:23 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Dirt on Obama is NOT going to make AA&#039;s turn from him; they&#039;re with him until the end. In fact, if Hillary or her surrogates even tried to filter dirt on him, they&#039;d be the first ones suspected and the AA community will turn on her. It&#039;s exactly what happened in 2008. DO NOT underestimate Obama&#039;s ability to make the fight even dirtier.

And if you think dirt on Obama will cause the progressive left to vote for Hillary, you&#039;re wrong. They just won&#039;t show up to vote. Check out the progressive blogs; they HATE the Clintons, Hillary in particular. Right now, they hate Obama, too, but these are principled activists who aren&#039;t going to vote for an insider and Hillary, to them, is the ultimate insider.

Hillary is shrewd. She&#039;s been in battle with Obama and she knows first-hand how dirty he and his surrogates play the game. She finally ran into someone who plays dirtier than the Clinton&#039;s. 

Nah, she&#039;s not running in 2012 and I highly doubt she&#039;ll run in 2016. Perhaps one day she&#039;ll run for Governor, but I think she retires as SOS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never, ever underestimate a Clinton’s ability to gather and disseminate as much dirt as possible on a potential enemy.<br />
<blockquote>She knows where the bodies are buried &#8211; and if there aren’t any bodies, she knows who to call to get some. The one thing I can say about Billy Jeff and his bride…they lie,they cheat, they’re total thugs &#8211; but they’re very, very good at it.<br />
I promise you, she’s taking notes on ol’ Barry. If she wanted to run in 2012, she’d know exactly where his vulnerabilities were, and how to exploit them to her advantage. I would put nothing, at all, past her.</p>
<p>uncivilized on October 12, 2009 at 10:23 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Dirt on Obama is NOT going to make AA&#8217;s turn from him; they&#8217;re with him until the end. In fact, if Hillary or her surrogates even tried to filter dirt on him, they&#8217;d be the first ones suspected and the AA community will turn on her. It&#8217;s exactly what happened in 2008. DO NOT underestimate Obama&#8217;s ability to make the fight even dirtier.</p>
<p>And if you think dirt on Obama will cause the progressive left to vote for Hillary, you&#8217;re wrong. They just won&#8217;t show up to vote. Check out the progressive blogs; they HATE the Clintons, Hillary in particular. Right now, they hate Obama, too, but these are principled activists who aren&#8217;t going to vote for an insider and Hillary, to them, is the ultimate insider.</p>
<p>Hillary is shrewd. She&#8217;s been in battle with Obama and she knows first-hand how dirty he and his surrogates play the game. She finally ran into someone who plays dirtier than the Clinton&#8217;s. </p>
<p>Nah, she&#8217;s not running in 2012 and I highly doubt she&#8217;ll run in 2016. Perhaps one day she&#8217;ll run for Governor, but I think she retires as SOS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sabu</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2826539</link>
		<dc:creator>sabu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2826539</guid>
		<description>I can hear the interview questions with the old bat now:


  Hillary, didn&#039;t you write your thesis on Saul Alinsky, a man you looked up to and thought was a political genius?


  Hillary, don&#039;t you think that shouting at the audience of bewildered Kenyans embarrassed the United States?


  Hillary, why did you agree to go to work for a man who hates this country and everything it stands for? Further, how could you whore yourself out to further his traitorous agenda?


  Hillary, how could you ever live down giving the Russians a button you &lt;em&gt;thought&lt;/em&gt; said &quot;reset&quot;?


  Hillary, how could you fail to support a democractically elected president in Honduras over his thug predecessor?


  Hillary, how could you have failed to let your boss sanction Iranians getting slaughtered in the street while they fought a tyrannical regime?


  Hillary, will you cry again when the poll numbers don&#039;t look good in future elections?


  Hillary, with all the millions you and Bill made off with and made through the WH, how come you haven&#039;t had lipo to suck out those cankles?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can hear the interview questions with the old bat now:</p>
<p>  Hillary, didn&#8217;t you write your thesis on Saul Alinsky, a man you looked up to and thought was a political genius?</p>
<p>  Hillary, don&#8217;t you think that shouting at the audience of bewildered Kenyans embarrassed the United States?</p>
<p>  Hillary, why did you agree to go to work for a man who hates this country and everything it stands for? Further, how could you whore yourself out to further his traitorous agenda?</p>
<p>  Hillary, how could you ever live down giving the Russians a button you <em>thought</em> said &#8220;reset&#8221;?</p>
<p>  Hillary, how could you fail to support a democractically elected president in Honduras over his thug predecessor?</p>
<p>  Hillary, how could you have failed to let your boss sanction Iranians getting slaughtered in the street while they fought a tyrannical regime?</p>
<p>  Hillary, will you cry again when the poll numbers don&#8217;t look good in future elections?</p>
<p>  Hillary, with all the millions you and Bill made off with and made through the WH, how come you haven&#8217;t had lipo to suck out those cankles?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Del Dolemonte</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2826535</link>
		<dc:creator>Del Dolemonte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2826535</guid>
		<description>This is all Bush&#039;s fault.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all Bush&#8217;s fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drunyan8315</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2826534</link>
		<dc:creator>drunyan8315</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2826534</guid>
		<description>Hillary retire?

Suggestion: go over to Ace&#039;s and read the eel story.  Hillary will retire a bit less gracefully than that eel.  Okay, a &lt;em&gt;lot&lt;/em&gt; less gracefully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary retire?</p>
<p>Suggestion: go over to Ace&#8217;s and read the eel story.  Hillary will retire a bit less gracefully than that eel.  Okay, a <em>lot</em> less gracefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seven Percent Solution</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2826525</link>
		<dc:creator>Seven Percent Solution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2826525</guid>
		<description>Hillary&#039;s campaign against &lt;em&gt;Teh Gelding...&lt;/em&gt;


&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;At least I still have my balls...!&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary&#8217;s campaign against <em>Teh Gelding&#8230;</em></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;At least I still have my balls&#8230;!&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ORconservative</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2826487</link>
		<dc:creator>ORconservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2826487</guid>
		<description>Oh, there are bodies and my guess is that she knows about every one of them.  
The problem is that Obama plays dirtier than the Clintons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, there are bodies and my guess is that she knows about every one of them.<br />
The problem is that Obama plays dirtier than the Clintons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Evil</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/12/hillary-no-no-no-im-not-running-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2826474</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Evil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=68809#comment-2826474</guid>
		<description>When was the last time she was in Kabul? The State Department has someone in Kabul -Who? Is this going to be another imperial life in the emerald city? Do we have the experienced and competent or the loyal and willing in Kabul? It does make a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When was the last time she was in Kabul? The State Department has someone in Kabul -Who? Is this going to be another imperial life in the emerald city? Do we have the experienced and competent or the loyal and willing in Kabul? It does make a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
