Video: White House communications chief whines about Fox News, media for nine minutes
posted at 6:46 pm on October 11, 2009 by Allahpundit
“Let’s not pretend they’re a news network the way CNN is,” she says, flattering the impartial, hard-news sensibility of an outfit that’s recently taken to fact-checking comedy skits on behalf of His Holiness. In fact, here’s what was airing on the “nonpartisan” cable news channel this morning before and after this miserable hack’s appearance:
All morning, CNN has been intermittently running a promo for Anderson Cooper 360, a show that has long billed itself as a classic straight news program with an investigative front man who digs “beyond the headlines” with “many points of view, so you can make up your own mind.” The new promo, by contrast, consists of a woman’s voice, pitching Cooper’s show as, essentially, a liberal alternative to Fox News: “I’m a lifelong Democrat,” she says, “and that’s why I watch Anderson Cooper.” Hmmm. The voice goes on to say that Cooper is the person she can turn to hold “right wing” conservatives accountable. Cooper is not exactly aiming for the political middle ground here.
A guy known for making “teabagging” jokes about conservatives appeals to Democrats? Go figure. Meanwhile, not a word is breathed here about the nightly backrubs that The One gets from Olbermann and Maddow on MSNBC, despite Dunn practically begging for a question in that vein by whining about Fox being aligned with one of the two major parties. Good work, Kurtz.
The clip of Chris Wallace calling them a bunch of crybabies is obligatory in any post about the most media-worshiped president since JFK whining about his coverage, but we’ve used it twice in just the past five days. So below, to administer the coup de grace, you’ll find a new one featuring our favorite liberal. Take it away, KP.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
People are saying in the other thread they won’t watch the SNL links. I refuse to watch any link for CNN, PMSNBC or any other of duh won’s cheerleaders.
Crybabies all.
Mangy Scot on October 11, 2009 at 8:02 PM
Why doesn’t the White House replace these lametards they are embarrassing.
///
Ha!Would there be anybody left??They’re all in bed together.Not an independent thought among them.
ohiobabe on October 11, 2009 at 8:02 PM
Get your BIG GIRL UNDERPANTS ON & deal with it!!!!!!!!!
1luckydogg on October 11, 2009 at 7:54 PM
1luckydogg: Mom Jeans come to mind!!
canopfor on October 11, 2009 at 8:03 PM
I didn’t say anything about not listening to them. I said she’s on TV and should be more consistent about looking pulled together. When you’re in the public eye in this sort of profession it’s a responsibility. Get real. If you had seen the whole show you’d see the difference between her and Tantaros. KP’s blazer also had a major button-gaping problem. It’s distracting. I want to be able to pay attention to what they say, not wonder why their hair is a mess. I didn’t have that problem with Tantaros.
I_C on October 11, 2009 at 8:04 PM
In your ear dipstick . . . go feed that crap to your Kool Aid drinkers because no one with more than two functioning synapse connections is drinking your garbage. CNN is a hard core left wing propaganda machine followed closely by MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, and the public broadcasting network. That useless gaggle in the White House is beyond stupid.
rplat on October 11, 2009 at 8:04 PM
in the same way the Bush admin’s media communication style reflected his personality, the Obama admin’s media communication style reflects his – flaccid poseur hungry for universal love to pump up the ego that know’s he’s gotten further on skin color than merit would have ever allowed.
cpr on October 11, 2009 at 8:04 PM
Interesting, isn’t it…
Me thinks Teh Gelding and his Administration protests too much… yet his name had to be submitted to the Nobel Committee in September 2008, before he even picked up a single piece of trash…
What else happened in September of 2008…?
… and not a word from CNN.
Seven Percent Solution on October 11, 2009 at 8:09 PM
said she’s on TV and should be more consistent about looking pulled together.
//
She looks a heck of alot better than the dunn dudette,besides what’s wrong with every hair not being in place.That dunn person’s hair is boring!
ohiobabe on October 11, 2009 at 8:09 PM
The only reason I pay extra for expanded basic cable is to watch fox news and they are certainly worth it.
fourdeucer on October 11, 2009 at 7:13 PM
Save your money (Live Stream) it on your computer for free.
heshtesh on October 11, 2009 at 8:11 PM
Canopfor, YES!!!! You are right!! But they are hiding under the MOM jeans………..HA HA HA ……..
1luckydogg on October 11, 2009 at 8:12 PM
Conservatives: Teabaggers.
Liberals: Teabaggees.
BDavis on October 11, 2009 at 8:13 PM
Is it possible Anita Dunn is in the midst of a major make over and she’ll be Butch Dunn next week,inquiring minds want to know.
heshtesh on October 11, 2009 at 8:16 PM
Unfortunately, we still live in a society where it actually matters more how a woman presents herself than a man…even though men are fast approaching an equal level of scrutiny.
Image mean something…research advertising psychology. We live in an image based society…meaning, we see news as images. How a commenter presents themselves can convey subtle messages of confidence or dissonance. One doesn’t necessarily have to be 100% fashionable, but, at least neatly presented.
Diane on October 11, 2009 at 8:16 PM
Well…..they really don’t call it that now, but moving along, it is interesting that with a near monopoly on the media, (as others have pointed out), total will only do.
Of course, their problem is 90% of the media amounts to only 45% of the total audience relative to Fox these days and probably only 25% when you include talk radio. As with Honduras, they do like pro-socialist strongarming…..
Starlink on October 11, 2009 at 8:17 PM
Is there a Nobel prize for having a ‘glass jaw’?
We’ve got a president who evidently needs to be cuddled 24/7.
Could it be that Barry has a massive inferiority complex that is masked by an overactive ego?
GarandFan on October 11, 2009 at 8:19 PM
Is it possible Anita Dunn is in the midst of a major make over and she’ll be Butch Dunn next week,inquiring minds want to know.
heshtesh on October 11, 2009 at 8:16 PM
///
Thanks for the laugh!
ohiobabe on October 11, 2009 at 8:21 PM
My that was pathetic. That reminds me of the WH snitch website where Obama supporters were to report “fishy” stories about health care “reform”.The Obama administration’s real problem appears to be with the Constitution and the First amendment.The notions of freedom of speech and a free press appear to be inconvenient annoyances for President Obama.I’ve got news for you Mr President you live in the USA not Communist China or Fascist Iran. Citizens have every right to criticize you, your policies and your administration.
Hera on October 11, 2009 at 8:21 PM
This may be the best comment ever.
Emily M. on October 11, 2009 at 8:24 PM
Citizens have every right to criticize you, your policies and your administration.
Hera on October 11, 2009 at 8:21 PM
//
Yeah,he didn’t hold back on his crit. of Mr.Bush did he?That was okay though.He makes me ill.
ohiobabe on October 11, 2009 at 8:25 PM
If this woman was a relative and spouse I’d have to
kill myself due to her voice alone. Couldn’t even
make through the 9 minute clip.
Where do they find these hacks ?
Texyank on October 11, 2009 at 8:26 PM
The lefties keep up the attack on Fox because:
1) Fox is the easiest target on the right end of the spectrum with a wide audience.
2) They tend to tell the truth – libs hate the truth.
3) Fox doesn’t get on their knees to kiss obummer good morning.
If everything from the center to the right disappeared it would be the far left fighting the not-so-far left.
Mangy Scot on October 11, 2009 at 8:28 PM
Fox News should change their name to “RNC TV”. Why do they even pretend to be a “News” channel?
Decider on October 11, 2009 at 8:28 PM
Another troll.
Starlink on October 11, 2009 at 8:30 PM
Sportin’ the Lefty Bob. What’s up with that anyway? It’s like some kind of uniform.
ronsfi on October 11, 2009 at 8:31 PM
The Red Eye gets more viewers at 3a.m. than CNN does at 7p.m.! Fox news is #1 in ratings and won’t bend over for Hussein like CNN, MSNBC, and the rest does!
BigMike252 on October 11, 2009 at 8:33 PM
Can you imagine if there was another equally influential channel like Fox News that reported in even greater depth about the individuals and groups that are pushing socialism in our nation? Actual in-depth investigative reporting and then showing the direct collusion with this Presidency and both political parties? Glenn Beck investigative reporting with the serious presentation of a nightly newscast. Daily, relentlessly, giving voice the 50% of the nation that opposes the slow implementation of Marxism.
Fox has some of that but it could be so much more.
I wonder how the White House would react to a news organization like that.
The nation is hungry for something like that.
True_King on October 11, 2009 at 8:34 PM
Canopfor, YES!!!! You are right!! But they are hiding under the MOM jeans………..HA HA HA ……..
1luckydogg on October 11, 2009 at 8:12 PM
1luckydogg:Tee-hee:)
canopfor on October 11, 2009 at 8:34 PM
The White House communications chief (maybe she’s on medication) looks like the Cadbury bunny and sounds like Edith Bunker. Speaking of Archie Bunker, here’s his take on Democrats.
alliebobbitt on October 11, 2009 at 8:35 PM
PS: Do you think they put peanut butter in Anita Dunn’s mouth before she goes on CNN? I’m sure her husband has some for the DNC… but not her.
alliebobbitt on October 11, 2009 at 8:37 PM
Waahhhh, waahhhhhhaaa, waahahhahhaaa! And what should MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, HEADLINE NEWS, NPR, ETC. change their names to? Put the pacifier back in your mouth leftard and STFU! LOL!
JAM on October 11, 2009 at 8:38 PM
Bernard McGuirk went on Sid’s radio show on 10-9 they are discussing the Nobel Prize and how the fawning of the media is what’s causing the backlash toward the President. I think he might be onto something.
Dr Evil on October 11, 2009 at 8:41 PM
That’s all decider? One lame comment then run and hide behind your mommies skirt? Troll.
Mangy Scot on October 11, 2009 at 8:43 PM
Sounds like CNN has decided that FNC is so far ahead of them in terms of viewership that they cant catch up, so instead of tying to compete with FNC they’re going to go after MSNBC’s audience instead by pandering to the far left and sucking up to the O’tards.
As for the administrations little whinge about FNC, what they are really sore about is the fact that despite getting so much favourable coverage on all the other news outlets no one is buying the snake oil they are selling because no one is getting their news from those outlets anymore. They’re all watching FOX or getting their news from alternative sources like the blogosphere.
Hellrider on October 11, 2009 at 8:50 PM
I am trying to help Fox by thinking up some new names for them. I really like “The Fox ACORN channel”, “RNC TV”, “The Van Jones Network”, or “The Fox Comedy Channel”.
They are using you people for ratings and money. Look up the definition of the word “Charlatan”. You will see a photo of Fox News under the definition.
By the way if they are so effective at hurting Democrats and their ratings translate into GOP victory, why do we have a Socialist, Marxist, Muslim, Non-American, Racist, president? Did I miss one of the Fox News narratives there?
Decider on October 11, 2009 at 8:53 PM
Hey White House lapdogs.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXoNE14U_zM&feature=related
FNC RULES!
redridinghood on October 11, 2009 at 8:53 PM
Why do you pretend that you’re anything other than an idiot troll? If you paid any attention to what is being said on Fox you’d know that the RNC/GOP is not spared from criticism. But then again, you’d need a functioning brain for that, so nevermind.
infidel4life on October 11, 2009 at 8:53 PM
I’m loving it. Keep whining, White House. The population is slowly but surely learning about Obama. Better late than never.
Which WH flack said “Better Oslo than Copenhagen?” The priority is clear and it’s all in the, ah, First Person.
Drained Brain on October 11, 2009 at 8:58 PM
Seriously?
What GOP politician has been called a Muslim, Marxist, Socialist, Racist, Terrorist on Fox? Fox News calls the President of the United States a racist and still pretends to be a “News” channel.
Fox News cheers for failure of the US and the US President. They seem to have a lot in common with Al Qaeda. Maybe they can change their name to “Fox Al Jazeera”
Decider on October 11, 2009 at 8:59 PM
Fox News, on average, has more viewers during prime time than any other cable news network. Sounds like a good media outlet to maximize your messaging.
It is Obama’s fault not to use Fox to get their messaging out.
Now someone explain to me why they are complaining about Fox News?
Rndguy on October 11, 2009 at 9:03 PM
http://www.skjoldlodge.com/images/trolls/ugly_troll.jpg
Red State State of Mind on October 11, 2009 at 9:05 PM
I’m all about the news on FOX. The one thing I don’t get, is why the same network that does have more conservative opinion shows also has some of the most vile “cartoons” on in prime time (which used to be family time). I don’t know if any of you have seen Family Guy or the other animated shows they run, but they are absolutely vile, saturated with blatant sexual imagery, not-so-subtle bathroom humor and explicit violence – along with mockery of conservative positions. Stuff that you would only see after midnight on Cinemax in the past, and now on prime time network TV.
miConsevative on October 11, 2009 at 9:06 PM
It’s because Murdoch is about the money–he can make money selling conservatives what they want to hear and at the same time rake it in with edgy cartoons. I don’t think he cares too much what the content is as long as it’s profitable (not that he should–he’s not in business to make us feel warm and fuzzy).
jonknee on October 11, 2009 at 9:14 PM
When you’re surrounded by sycophants, objectivity looks like hostility.
Merovign on October 11, 2009 at 9:16 PM
I looked all over for your similar complaints about MSNBC and CNN, re; their one-sidedness.
massrighty on October 11, 2009 at 9:20 PM
1. CNN falsely accused the US of nerve-gassing civilians in Laos.
2. CNN ignored Saddam Hussein’s atrocities against his own citizens for 10 years, just so they wouldn’t lose their precious Baghdad Bureau of Propaganda. Their CEO admitted this in a NY Times editorial.
3. Said CEO himself was soon gone, after being busted for falsely accusing US troops of “murdering” Iraqi journalists.
Can you give us similar examples from Faux News? If so, we’ll talk. Until then, go stand in the corner.
Del Dolemonte on October 11, 2009 at 9:20 PM
Well, not a Muslim or a Terrorist.
Now about racism. There’s certainly a lot more evidence to suggest Obama is a racist than there is to suggest I am. Yet the other stations regularly call me a racist.
jhffmn on October 11, 2009 at 9:20 PM
Again I repeat their stalker like obession with Fox News borders is really really creepy.
Fox News needs to do a commercial like they did for Fox Nation telling the administration to grow up.
gophergirl on October 11, 2009 at 9:20 PM
Sorry watching the Twins while typing
gophergirl on October 11, 2009 at 9:21 PM
You don’t watch FNC or you couldn’t say that with a straight face.
thomasaur on October 11, 2009 at 9:27 PM
FOX News Commentators:
Bill O’Reilly
Sean Hannity
Glenn Beck
And of course, there are others. But there are far more of these.
FOX News Reporters:
Major Garrett
Wendell Goler
Jennifer Griffin
Carl Cameron
Shannon Bream
Brian Wilson
Catherine Herridge
Jim Angle
Steve Centanni
Does the Obama White House know the difference? Doesn’t seem like it to me.
StewartIII on October 11, 2009 at 9:29 PM
No I’m not fat. But guess if I was that would automatically make anything I had to say unimportant in the superficial television punditry world.
The thing is that Kirsten has nice make up and hair is done and people are still complaining. I wouldn’t be surprised if she spent more than hour getting her hair fixed. So it is not about her not caring what she looks like on television. It is petty complaining about how she fixed her hair.
terryannonline on October 11, 2009 at 9:30 PM
Translation: Fox News does not cover for Obama’s mistakes and misstatements, or give non-stop fawning, drooling coverage, or picture him with a round object behind his head resembling a halo.
scrubjay on October 11, 2009 at 9:31 PM
CNN has a much longer history, but some recent examples for you:
Geraldo gave up troop movements on a Fox broadcast and ended up getting kicked out by the military. Trading ratings for troop safety.
And CEOs? Fox News’ CEO Roger Ailes joked about Barack Obama’s name being confused with Osama Bin Laden.
jonknee on October 11, 2009 at 9:32 PM
LoL! Just had to share this. Online crossword puzzle, a 5-letter word, the clue is ‘Unqualified’. So, I tried O-B-A-M-A…sadly, it didn’t fit with the letters around it.
Left Coast Right Mind on October 11, 2009 at 9:32 PM
Winner of the most astute comment.
anniekc on October 11, 2009 at 9:34 PM
She seems awfully stage-frightened for a communications advisor.
Tuning Spork on October 11, 2009 at 9:40 PM
Did you hear our POUTS’ pastor of 20 years talking about whites and “the rain in Spain stays mainly on the plains” at the NAACAP?
alliebobbitt on October 11, 2009 at 9:41 PM
Murdoch’s about the money and throwing slop out to a constituency, unlike Immelt and Sulzberger and Time Warner. They’re just in it to push the DNC agenda I guess, eh? Such purity of motive.
Liberal products aren’t selling, conservative products are. If blaming evil old Murdoch takes the edge off the pain, so be it.
ddrintn on October 11, 2009 at 9:42 PM
Anderson Cooper was very much planned to be CNN’s big SUPERSTAR but the boy can’t just hold in the giggles whenever he gets Bette Midler or Kathy Griffin on his show. “You get two snaps, Girlfriend!” hee-hee-hee And this they blame on FoxNews?!?
Marcus on October 11, 2009 at 9:44 PM
Stop me, if you’ve heard these talking points before.
MUSLIM “GOP is racist, needs to diversify, needs a broader tent… ”
(While Obama had how many messages to the Muslim community vs. Christians?)
MARXIST “Spread the wealth.”
SOCIALIST “Deregulation”
TERRORIST Ayers. Any GOP candidate ever hang out with someone so creepy?
alliebobbitt on October 11, 2009 at 9:48 PM
Is she chewing her teeth?
Tuning Spork on October 11, 2009 at 9:49 PM
His show should be called Who Queefed? He should change his name to Anderson Queeferson.
alliebobbitt on October 11, 2009 at 9:51 PM
I remember negative stories and commentary about Sarah Palin on Fox News last fall. I don’t seem to remember very much negativity or criticial examination of Obama on the alphabet networks, even now. They’re Obama’s mouthpieces, nothing more.
ddrintn on October 11, 2009 at 9:53 PM
“wing of the Republican Party”
If Fox News is a wing, then the other networks are Democratic Party turbojets capable of flying Air Force One with their adoration of all things Dem.
Dr. ZhivBlago on October 11, 2009 at 9:57 PM
What GOP politician has been a Muslim, Marxist, Socialist, Racist, Terrorist?
Chris_Balsz on October 11, 2009 at 10:00 PM
What a hack!
I’d say, as cable news media goes, the socialists outnumber Fox three or four to one. And Fox’s viewership still outnumbers them all.
hopefloats on October 11, 2009 at 10:06 PM
Speaking Truth To Power, baby. Isn’t that how you guys cheered Olbermann for the last 4 years? Do we really need to run a montage of all the times he called Bush a failure and even suggested he should be impeached?
rockmom on October 11, 2009 at 10:06 PM
Can someone tell me if I should watch this or not? I get the feeling I won’t take anything away but irritation with these arrogant evil SOBS.
RightWinged on October 11, 2009 at 10:07 PM
Watch it. It’s entertaining to see these disingenuous, whiny hacks.
ddrintn on October 11, 2009 at 10:12 PM
Right now the failure of the U.S. President is a victory for the U.S.
jimmy2shoes on October 11, 2009 at 10:12 PM
That White House communications chief has a whine to her voice that makes me puke… I couldn’t make it thruogh the video… did she say anything important or just complain that Fox wasn’t worshipping the Muslim’s feet?
IntheNet on October 11, 2009 at 10:12 PM
MMMM MMMM MMMM Barack Hussein Obama. Rinse Wash Repeat.
Dr Evil on October 11, 2009 at 10:12 PM
I agree. Fox News is better than the alternatives, in that you at least get a glimpse of something besides Obama worship, but we really need a serious investigative news organization.
mbs on October 11, 2009 at 10:13 PM
Hanging curve balls aplenty for Kurz to whack out of the park but – no questions for this whiner.
These “journalists” are simply incompetent.
What a bogus profession.
rickyricardo on October 11, 2009 at 10:14 PM
There was a time when CNN ruled the airwaves, particularly during coverage of Gulf War I. Everyone, and every government in the world, watched the coverage. That time is past. The internet was in its’ infancy. Fox network was best known for Married With Children (my all time favorite show).
Stasis is what many people wish for. True change is scary. Not ‘Hope and Change’. Change like deciding nuclear power truly is a path to energy independence. Even France can see this. IRAN, if they were not led by a lying sack of sh*ts, could be a case for this.
Fox News is currently the best option to get relatively unbiased news about the events of the world.
Disclosure: I get NO financial rewards from any of the entities named in this post (obligatory nowadays).
GnuBreed on October 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM
Translation:
“No, I can’t”
Del Dolemonte on October 11, 2009 at 10:16 PM
Better yet, put your Big Girl underpants over your head and stop complaining because Fox News won’t fall into bed with you and Obama.
RandyChandler on October 11, 2009 at 10:18 PM
Decider ,, what specifically does Al Queda have in common with Fox News? Al Quaida shares the same goals that Al Jazeera has and how does that have anything in common with Fox when you accuse Fox of being anti-muslim? I guess you want a State Run Media praising our leader and omitting all the bad news that the Russians used to do. I remember and wondered why the old USSR never had plane crashes or any other disasters. I guess it pays to have a state run media when you don’t want any patriotic dissent.
garydt on October 11, 2009 at 10:25 PM
Kind of OT, but has anyone noticed the “V” promos that ABC is running? They mention that the Visitors are bringing “hope” to the Earth, and at one point, the lead female ‘Visitor’..played by Morena Baccarin-YUM!…asks a news anchor not to ask any questions that might put the Visitors..you know, the lizards that enslave the Earth..in a bad light.
Remind you of something?
HAnthonyWayne on October 11, 2009 at 10:33 PM
Scratch a lib, find a totalitarian. They can’t tolerate dissent. They can only argue by demonizing.
ddrintn on October 11, 2009 at 10:34 PM
^ I mean, really, what do the libs want? For Fox to be forced off the air?
ddrintn on October 11, 2009 at 10:35 PM
Is it their goal to keep repeating this pathetic whine until Fox News is taken off the air? Because it’s beyond annoying now. If they succeed, and Fox is forced out, it will probable be replaced by this shown 24/7 as a reminder to the infidels who is in charge!
varnson on October 11, 2009 at 10:35 PM
In the case of the false allegation about the Laos nerve-gassing, CNN’s “star” reporter, Peter Arnett, ended up leaving, and a couple of people got fired.
And Eason Jordan resigned in disgrace after his false accusation about the US soldiers “murdering” Iraqi journalists.
I’m not excusing Hairaldo, but I doubt what he did was intentional. In all of the CNN cases I cited, they knew fully well what they were doing.
Del Dolemonte on October 11, 2009 at 10:37 PM
BREAKING NEWS…..
Hot Air poster to White House Communications spokesbabe.
“YOU LIE”
PappyD61 on October 11, 2009 at 10:37 PM
Well, if it’s ever forced off the air we can treat ourselves to the strokes of genius of the Modern-Day Murrow on MSNBC, like “Health Care Reform: THE FIGHT AGAINST DEATH!!!!!” LOL
ddrintn on October 11, 2009 at 10:43 PM
This new White House attack uses a lot of Saul Alinsky’s rules…..for example….
Rule # 12
Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it
RULE # 10
If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.
RULE # 8
Keep the pressure on. Never let up.
RULE # 6
A good tactic is one your people enjoy.
RULE # 5
Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.
The Obama Administration is just the tip of the iceberg as far as the Progressive Cancer that is afflicting this country. These people will not stop, this is THEIR RELIGION!!
PappyD61 on October 11, 2009 at 10:43 PM
Did FOX News ever “Fact Check” a skit from SNL?
hawkdriver on October 11, 2009 at 10:58 PM
Can you give us similar examples from Faux News? If so, we’ll talk. Until then, go stand in the corner.
Del Dolemonte on October 11, 2009 at 9:20 PM
Fox news took out a full page ad in the Washington Post stating that CNN and MSNBC among others had missed the covering of the 9/12 march. Rick Sanchez, defending CNN, re-showed clips of the coverage that CNN had done numerous times throughout the day of 9/12. The FOX ad was a lie that they must of known was not true.
rjl1999 on October 11, 2009 at 11:00 PM
Is this woman whining for Obama on Cocaine?? Just what exactly does she keep doing with her mouth… It reminds me of the coke whores that went to my high school.. this woman has got to be on something…
ivorygirl on October 11, 2009 at 11:00 PM
Even KP thinks The One is a sobbing little one-testicle whiny wimpy ultra-beta disgusting pathetic toy.
Sapwolf on October 11, 2009 at 11:12 PM
LOL…she complains that Fox didn’t cover the Ensign story, but she didn’t seem to notice CNN’s silence on ACORN and Van Jones…which was more important?
I’d have to see the ad. Do you have a link?
ddrintn on October 11, 2009 at 11:13 PM
rjl1999, was Sanchez fair on the coverage. After all Fox has to keep track of all the rest of the state media while the state media only has to keep track of one media outlet. By the way,, can you still explain the high ratings Fox has over the competition?
garydt on October 11, 2009 at 11:14 PM
The writers for Pravda in Soviet Russia were faced with toting the communist line or ending up in a Gulag and death.
Our sniveling journalists today, who are disgrace to what was once a profession more or less, gladly lick boot polish and kiss ass. And those few who do not are demonized by the whining ninnies of the white house and the left.
Bad times.
Dhuka on October 11, 2009 at 11:16 PM
Is it true that Death felt so much pity for the fairy that he stopped the fight?
If Olby cried it was because:
1) He wanted to copy Beck, or
2) He was still guilty for letting his Dad die rather than use his large amounts of money to help him.
Sapwolf on October 11, 2009 at 11:16 PM
I’d have to see the ad. Do you have a link?
ddrintn on October 11, 2009 at 11:13 PM
http://mokellyreport.wordpress.com/2009/09/20/cnns-rick-sanchez-blasts-fox-news-inaccuracies/
rjl1999 on October 11, 2009 at 11:18 PM
Kurtz in the WaPo on the Fox ad:
I’d say Fox has a legitimate beef there. The protest of “about 50,000 or so” was painted as being orchestrated by Murdoch and Beck. Which is a lie also.
ddrintn on October 11, 2009 at 11:25 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »