How This Ex-Liberal Found Fortitude and Her Way Home
posted at 10:32 am on October 10, 2009 by Anita MonCrief
Growing up black and Catholic in the South was an interesting experience that taught me a great deal about people. I believe I spent less than a week in public school before transferring to a private Catholic school and beginning theology classes that still intertwine with my life experience. I remember going to a Baptist funeral and feeling so out of place. The expression of intense emotion was not something that I had ever seen in church, the songs were unfamiliar and the style was foreign to me. Growing up poor in a less than ideal family dynamic led for me to crave order and routine. Some friends often remarked about the order of the Mass or told me that it was boring, but to me it was comforting. I knew what was coming and I was ready. Reciting phrases in Latin or receiving Communion were things I trusted and understood.
Often in interviews I am asked about my conversion from the far left liberal (radical) to the conservative movement and I always think back to first grade. While I had been Catholic all my life, I did not realize it until I went to school. I felt a little lost and very scared. That’s how I feel about blacks and conservatism. I left the church as a young woman, the church never changed but my desire not to live by its rules led me to break free.
Over the years, I have tried and studied other religions but Catholicism is home, and nothing feels like home. As a liberal there was a certain part of me that fought against the world. It was never a fair fight though, because my opinions were set and no amount of proof could change that. As a liberal trying to find her way, I often felt like I was trying on religions again. I didn’t fit in, asked lots of questions and was uneasy about my path. Being lost will do that, only I did not know I was on the wrong path. I channeled that anger at the “system” into art work, I went home at night and tried not to think about the moms living on Section 8 in the “projects” who worried about their kids and still tried to look out for me too. I ignored the feelings of desperation when I talked to my young friends, so full of promise but without an adequate foundation to succeed.
The Democrats seemed to be the answer: social programs, better schools, and politicians who cared. I do think that if I had never seen the other side of community organizing that I would still be blindly following along that same path. Being a conservative gives me hope, and peace. While it has not been easy, I decided to start with what made me love America as a child – its history and Constitution- and go from there. Friends who are still radicals rail at me for loving a country that enslaved us, and I tell them I don’t. I love a country that had the guts to stand up time and time again and right a wrong. A country that is not afraid to pick itself up and start again.
The media, think tanks and leftist organizations paint the right as hate mongers and I believed it for a number of years. Going to events like the Defending the American Dream Summit this past weekend continues to enlighten me. I find warm, regular people who have traveled and taken time off to be there. It was not a gathering of paid hacks, or reporters patting themselves on the back for Van Jones. Moms, dads, nurses, doctors, bloggers and people from all over America, discussed the state of our country and their fears for the world their children would be inheriting.
Comparing it to a leftist conference I went to in 2007 I was amazed at how helpful and open the staff and sponsors were. No egos here. Tim Phillips went out of his way to accommodate those of us who ended up in the overflow room after an expected surge of attendees. The next day, I spoke on a panel and was overwhelmed by the support in the room. Conservatives seemed to be more accepting of differences and willing to listen and respond to others without attacking or belittling them.
Putting political ideology aside for a moment, I will tell anyone that there has been a certain amount of inner peace that I have never had before and I have noticed more harmony in my family. For the first time in my adult life I can honestly say that I am not at war with myself or the world. I never knew that by changing my political beliefs that I would find my faith, change the course of my life and end a self destructive pattern of victimhood.
This post was promoted from GreenRoom to HotAir.com.
To see the comments on the original post, look here.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
It seems like you are the only one who mentions race. Your hateful rant proves Anita’s point.
HellCat on October 10, 2009 at 11:47 AM
Welcome, Anita. Welcome to the real race: the race to defend the unalienable, God-given rights of all men, regardless of genetics.
It’s good to have you on the front lines. :)
spmat on October 10, 2009 at 11:52 AM
It’s amazing, isn’t it?
I am a transition conservative, too. I was just confused. So many liberals are. So many liberals are afraid of their “inner conservative”, because they have been conditioned by very effective and powerful propaganda.
If they so much as even flirt with the ideology, they get an Pavlovian upset tummy.
The funny thing is, so many live a philosophy of conservatism within their own personal lives, but fail to make the connection to their politics. When they try to discuss politics, they go wacky on you.
The propaganda is powerful.
Saltysam on October 10, 2009 at 11:52 AM
I understand her feelings of being a “Stranger in a Strange Land” (props to Robert Heinlein) since I left the Catholic Church for Presbyterianism when I was in my early 40s. At first, it felt strange and somehow disquieting to abandon something that I had grown up with (Catholic school and all), but once I realized that my heart lay elsewhere, I knew I had “come home” to a belief system that suited me better. The point is not to which religion or set of beliefs to which you lay claim, but that the mantle you wear is the right one for you. There is no need to be angry over someone’s conversion to another point of view; accept that they have seen things from a different perspective. Am I happy that Anita Moncrief is a conservative? You bet, but I’m not angry that others are liberals. I’m only bewildered when people of any stripe refuse to explore an alternative point of view.
College Prof on October 10, 2009 at 11:52 AM
As a person in the process of becoming Catholic, I understand fully Anita’s feelings.
For those of you who wish to read another wonderful blogger who has had a political “road to Damascus” conversion like Anita, I enthusiastically refer you to: AFROCITY.
Mutnodjmet on October 10, 2009 at 11:53 AM
Oh, and I bet her book would be a NYT best seller!
College Prof on October 10, 2009 at 11:53 AM
Explanation? Easy: Stockholm syndrome.
Thurmond and Helms? Ask their local constituents. Just as I have to regret that constituents send corrupt politicians like Rangel, Waters, and Murtha to Congress.
Thurmond and Helms are products of a bygone era. I’ll explain them to you, after you explain George Wallace and too many other racist Dems to me.
BuckeyeSam on October 10, 2009 at 11:53 AM
You know, in a way, Obama’s election is allowing some liberal folks to see the light a bit here. Not to mention awakening the silent majority. Careful, you might have gotten what you asked for commies! My hope is alive, and the change is coming.
moyeti on October 10, 2009 at 11:54 AM
Isn’t it time for your smarter brother Wolfie to take you to the potty?
Patrick S on October 10, 2009 at 11:55 AM
I agree.
Sweetness0726 on October 10, 2009 at 11:55 AM
Great post and a great example for others. The GOP can attract more like-minded minorities but we have to promote qualified, conservative minorities over establishment candidates (Charlie Crist comes to mind). I’ve donated money to Michael Williams and I urge others to donate to him as well. If you can, also donate to Marco Rubio and Ryan Frazier.
I think there are a lot of minorities that are at heart Conservatives but either haven’t realized it or have been intimidated into hiding the fact. Let’s do what we can to make the “awakening” easier by supporting the above candidates so that they can provide high profile examples to friend and political foe alike.
DerKrieger on October 10, 2009 at 11:56 AM
As a Catholic IMHO this past election was a wake-up call from God. Abortion vs Choice, Good vs Evil, Right vs Wrong, Lies vs Truth. Complacency is no longer an option. Thank you Anita for a wonderful post … God must be smiling.
redridinghood on October 10, 2009 at 11:58 AM
I never understood racism. As a half Korean it never made sense to me. Why? One fundamental principle that kept me from understanding it was this: we’re all human. We’re all equal because we’re human. The other principle came straight from philosophy: equal =/= same. Thomas Jefferson could say that far more eloquently, but I like the simplicity of the previous statement.
I have always looked at the poorest communities and wondered why they do the same thing expecting different results. The answer is usually because they don’t know better.
I’ve come to the conclusion that the democrats are slavers. They were then. They still are now.
Chaz706 on October 10, 2009 at 11:59 AM
Thanks for sharing, Anita. I think you’ll find that conservatives, by and large, are people who quietly roll up their sleeves and get to work. There aren’t any victims on our side of the political aisle: only people who are willing to help others because we believe it’s in our common interest to help people pick themselves up and find their place.
One other thing. When it comes to race, we take MLK’s maxim to “not judge others by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character” seriously.
I think you’ll fit right in.
-Wanderlust
Wanderlust on October 10, 2009 at 12:01 PM
Bleeds Blue,
1. Only liberals obsess about what the color of ones skin is. Conservatives are more concerned about content of character. BTW-apparently you did not get the memo. Your fellow travelers have finally figured out that tossing “The Race Card(TM)” isn’t working. In fact it has backfired on them. Your new meme is that “Conservatives and Republicans are anti American terrorists.”. I find it funny that you guys look in the mirror to find your memes.
2. I have a little story for you. Remember Katrina? Remember how the “Rev.s” Jackson and Sharpton showed up in NOLA for a press conference/photo op and then went back to NYC and Chicago as fast as their private jets could get them there? Want to know why? Because they discovered that the only blacks in Louisiana who were buying their crap were their fellow race warriors, the rest didn’t want anything to do with them. As my friend told me “We all knew what they were there for, they wanted to use us to get money and power. They really don’t give a damn about us, they never have. You noticed how they made damn sure they didn’t get their fancy suits and shoes dirty or ruin their manicures.”.
Nahanni on October 10, 2009 at 12:01 PM
What a wonderful and inspiring story. Too many in the black community don’t realize that conservatives want them to succeed and liberals want to keep them poor so that they’ll be dependent on them and continue to vote for Democrats. I’m so glad Anita figured this out and found peace. Glad to have you with us!
Lizzy on October 10, 2009 at 12:02 PM
As a Conservative whose never been a Liberal my theory is just that…a theory but I believe many people are Liberals because too many people find it easier and more satisfying to act upon emotion rather than rational thought. For example, it feels good to provide welfare and other support to poor mothers and their children without ever asking the question, how did that person arrive at their situation? A Conservative may decide that the right thing to do is to deny aid and thereby force the person to become self-sufficient rather than dependent. The difference is that you need to take the long view and understand that a little pain now is better than a lifetime of soul crushing dependency.
Why do you think Conservatives are so often called “mean”? Misplaced compassion is the real crime against the needy. What people need is a hand up, not a handout.
My bumper sticker quote is “Liberalism is the triumph of emotion over reason”
DerKrieger on October 10, 2009 at 12:03 PM
Try having a vapid, self-important, preachy charlatan falsly claiming to represent your party and the media eating it up like cake and see if you don’t take a few potshots.
Heh, that’s right, you actually have a vapid, self-important, preachy charlatan leading your party.
Monica on October 10, 2009 at 12:03 PM
There’s one, very-big, and very sad one in this thread: BleedsBlue.
I’m an ex-liberal who also came to realize that the hateful mantras the left spits out about the right are nothing more than self-serving lies. When I read BleedsBlue drivel I think, “There but for the grace of God go I for once I too was a mindless idiot.”
Mad Scientist makes a good point that people like BreedsBlue are not thinking for themselves.
I’d also offer that, like Anita MonCrief shows, sometimes it takes getting out into the real world to open your eyes to the truth.
Rod
Rod on October 10, 2009 at 12:04 PM
Welcome Aboard Anita!
Dire Straits on October 10, 2009 at 12:06 PM
BuckeyeSam on October 10, 2009 at 11:53 AM
Dont forget Senator KKK Byrd.
faol on October 10, 2009 at 12:06 PM
Absolutely. On the heels of the civil rights act (which was pushed much harder by republicans than democrats, btw) came LBJ’s “Great Society” and the enshrinement of blacks within it as a permanent ward of the democrat party. Any black person who breaks free of this slavery is derided in the harshest of racist terminology by democrats.
Wanderlust on October 10, 2009 at 12:09 PM
You just proved my point, dumbass.
Norman Blizter on October 10, 2009 at 12:09 PM
BleedsBlue, Republicans didn’t GET me on any team. I listened to both parties (thank you C-SPAN) and found out that Democrats were full of crap. The Dems have no ideas but only seek to appeal to feelings rather than reason—with good cause, Dem voters don’t know how to and can’t think.
The Republicans offered rational arguments for policy positions rather than scare tactics. They didn’t have to offer me welfare money, affirmative action jobs, or any of that nonsense. I heard what made sense, what fit with the Constitution, and assentted. Nobody GOT me; I’m not a package for some dolt to move around. I’m not a Tin Man like so many Democrat voters.
Do yourself a favor, boy, and stop bowing and scraping before the Massas on your little plantation. Your new owners come in black and white, and they will lie to you to make sure their foot remains on your neck. Don’t be afraid to leave the plantation. When you leave, you can buy your own 40 acres and your own mule.
SilentWatcher on October 10, 2009 at 12:10 PM
BleedsBlue,
Another fine example of slavemasters telling the constituents to get back on the plantation. Liberals keep victims chained because they want them to vote for them.
Frank completely misses the mark.
canditaylor68 on October 10, 2009 at 12:14 PM
BleedsBlue, Jesse Helms racist my ass. Jesse Helms was the man standing up for Darfur when not one black politician was. THe only black person standing for Darfur was some skinny black college kid and Jesse. WHere was Sharpton and Jesse? Yapping that they didn’t believe the kid or Jesse Helms; I betcha “Minister” Farrakhan told them Darfur was a white lie.
SilentWatcher on October 10, 2009 at 12:15 PM
You calling commenter’s dumbass render your posts inconsequential.
Wade on October 10, 2009 at 12:17 PM
Spoken like a true Simon Legree. Black people are human, you know. They do have minds of their own. They aren’t infants. They don’t need you to take care of them.
Really? I haven’t. Haven’t read that anywhere on the right. I’ve only read it in the fever swamps of transference on the Left, along with the gleeful racist self-indulgence of white leftists painting Michael Steele in blackface or calling Condi Rice a “house n****“. Decent human beings should be ashamed of things like that. The Left certainly isn’t. To them, a black person is only black, indeed is only human, if they do as they’re told by their leftist masters.
Notice, you’re the one conflating the questioning of Obama’s patriotism and racism. We don’t even think about his color when we question his judgment. We just look at his words and actions.
Really, Francis? You’re still hyperventilating over Willie Horton?
We don’t like criminals. White, black, green or blue. And the vast majority of those affected by welfare reform were white, not black.
Because black people only live in large cities. Who’s racist again?
Really. First I’ve heard of it.
Because government discrimination in favor of a certain subset of the population doesn’t equal discrimination against another. Obviously, you like discrimination. We don’t. Of any kind.
Everyone I know that lives in that kind of community is a arugula-swilling BoBo lefty that feels guilty about their wealth but would cut my throat if I got anywhere near it.
It doesn’t need changing. That was her whole point.
Liberty transcends race, creed, religion and culture, and it must be defended from government and collectivists like you.
spmat on October 10, 2009 at 12:21 PM
Jeff from WI on October 10, 2009 at 11:12 AM, it’s an interesting story, but Anita’s only a so-so writer.
SilentWatcher on October 10, 2009 at 12:22 PM
Why do you feel the need to belittle Anita? Maybe you should go back and reread her article again and then do some thinking.
caygeon on October 10, 2009 at 12:24 PM
Which is why the first piece of propaganda they get from their puppet-masters is “You are the only ones thinking for yourselves. Not like those hide-bound conservatives”.
venividivici on October 10, 2009 at 12:28 PM
Anita,
Welcome and what a beautiful post you have written. Thank you. As an ex-liberal of the late 60’s through the 90’s you give me faith that I have chosen the correct path. I know what great intellectual courage and honesty it takes to walk your path. My prayer is that you keep to your walk.
Shalom
Grayzel on October 10, 2009 at 12:29 PM
Who is Anita Moncrief?
amkun on October 10, 2009 at 12:30 PM
What is really cute is that you exposed yourself as a racist
CWforFreedom on October 10, 2009 at 12:31 PM
amkun– from ballotpedia.com
CWforFreedom on October 10, 2009 at 12:32 PM
Anita MonCrief is an inspiration. If you don’t know who she is, try googling her name and learn something. I am sharing her story with my facebook friends.
winfield on October 10, 2009 at 12:34 PM
I’m 42. Having grown up without any organized religion in my life I can only imagine how difficult it would be to be a _________ (insert organized religion here) and a Liberal at the same time.
I say this because Liberalism is a religion. A religion with it’s prayers, prophets, blind faith requirements, etc.. So, I imagine in your case, being a Catholic and a Liberal would be about as confusing as being a Catholic and a Muslim. Although most organized religions have common denominators they are also different in enough significant measures that it would be mentally difficult, if not destabilizing, to remain devout to both, or either, religion.
At the beginning of this posting I said that I had no experience with devotion to an organized religion. Although that is technically true I am a Conservative that follows the Conservative philosophy. Which, to me, says that I understand, accept and follow the laws of physics and nature and apply these universal constants to the decisions I make in my life.
Is this a religious or philosophical approach to life? I’m not certain. In either case, the inner peace you describe and have experienced as a Conservative is more than just familiar to me. I am genuinely glad you experience/feel this calm resolute. I pity those on the radical left that languish in superficial, valueless discussions that center on things like skin color. When I see them thumbing their noses at universal constants, attempting to cheat (most of the time with the best of intentions) mother nature with some 600 page social program I truly feel pity for them. They will always struggle against the current and never feel that inner peace and warmth you now know and have described.
Welcome. Peace.
watson007 on October 10, 2009 at 12:39 PM
Sweet!
ohiobabe on October 10, 2009 at 12:40 PM
Thank you, Anita.
.
GT on October 10, 2009 at 12:40 PM
Whatever your skin color, whatever your religion, for that matter, whatever your politics; I’m glad that you are comfortable in your own skin, and not angry at the world. I’m also glad to have a person who thinks for themselves on my team!
bikermailman on October 10, 2009 at 12:44 PM
A black libertarian I know and met in business school was doing some research on the minority communities here in the US and his conclusions (reached in conjunction with some very well-known economists) was that minority communities actually display economic characteristics more common to what investors call “emerging markets” than to the rest of the US economy. From that perspective, they are voting their short-term economic interests in order to stay afloat.
What set in motion the processes that disconnected these communities from the larger US economy? Many of them, once white racism had begun to abate, were the policies of the Great Society. So, yes, there’s a tension between what many of the institutions of these minority communities teach from an ethical and social standpoint, which can be quite in line with the broader conservative viewpoint on those issues, and the economic disaster that was, in large measure, the fault of the failure of the Great Society agenda. So, because the Left help put these communities into “survival mode” and then offer them the meager opportunities that the Left approves of (e.g., government jobs, as opposed to private sector jobs), as well as the media-promoted leadership constantly telling them that the government is their savior, without ever examining the counter-hypothesis that without government intervention into these communities over the past 40+ years, they’d be in a better place, they end up voting Democrat.
It is hard to blame them for this, which is why I blame people like you, who set in motion these processes.
venividivici on October 10, 2009 at 12:44 PM
Anita Moncrief, thank you for sharing such a personal story. It must be difficult and I can’t imagine what you’ve been subjected to lately. It surely can’t be easy. The strength, grace and courage you’ve shown is a testament to your character.
You’re in my prayers…
NYconservative on October 10, 2009 at 12:45 PM
bleeds blue,
Much as I enjoy riling up a few folks here (especially on that idiot from Alaska), and much as I agree that there is certain degree of racism involved in opposition to Obama especially from the likes of Limbaugh and Beck, the race card is the left’s favorite weapon where Maureen Dowd hears the ”boy” and frothing Frank Rich writes about end of the White male privileges–as if writing 1500 words weekly columns on the nation’s largest newspaper is not a privilege! Indeed, it seems the Left’s argument is that the opposition of Obama=racism. Pff..and that’s not true just in case of America. In the part of the world where I come from–South Asia–it’s the same. It’s simply because modern-day liberals have never quite appreciated the importance of the individual.
Or take the immigration debate as an example. I am here in this country on a student visa on which I face 20 restrictions including inability to work outside the school e.t.c. I frequently hear from liberal website like Daily kos how the HIB process is used to undermine the American labor e.t.c. e.t.c. Fine. Every country has the right to decide its legal framework and if America does not want me, I will pack my bags and go home. But then I hear from the same guys how illegal immigrants need to be legalized and opposition to that is, by it self, racist. Excuse me. So people who actually followed the law, got their papers right, stood in long lines outside the embassy, worked hard to get admission in good schools, and pay good money for that education and now want to work are somehow not welcome but people who simply slipped across the border must be legalized. What kind of bloody hypocrisy is that. Or the liberal worry over sweatshops in India or China. Stop being so fucking condescending. Yes, these countries are poor and people work for less than desirable wages. But hey, liberals will argue that they should operate in the same conditions as Americans knowing fully well that will means they won’t have any jobs. What a brilliant case of bloody hypocrisy. Or should I say classical European behavior? The bastards in old Europe lecture America which all said and done remains the most welcoming country in the world while carefully guarding their racial composition. Indeed, if counting minorities is the liberal criterion, when is Europe going to elect a Black man?
So, please. STFU. And spend more time, evaluating your own conduct before pointing fingers at others.
rightistliberal on October 10, 2009 at 12:45 PM
test
rightistliberal on October 10, 2009 at 12:50 PM
You know before Democrats got hold of the black community that it had higher family retention, and lower out of wedlock pregnancies that the white community, but we’re the racist ones.
Isn’t the voting rights act a stumbling block to any attempt to stop voter fraud by the use of identification. Don’t you want to ensure that elections are fair and free of fraud?
“the Court expects that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest approved today.” Sandra Day O’Connor
I don’t live in a gated community and I don’t know anyone who does.
DFCtomm on October 10, 2009 at 12:51 PM
bleeds blue,
Much as I enjoy riling up a few folks here (especially on that idiot from Alaska), and much as I agree that there is certain degree of racism involved in opposition to Obama especially from the likes of Limbaugh and Beck, the race card is the left’s favorite weapon where Maureen Dowd hears the ”boy” and frothing Frank Rich writes about end of the White male privileges–as if writing 1500 words weekly columns on the nation’s largest newspaper is not a privilege! Indeed, it seems the Left’s argument is that the opposition of Obama=racism. Pff..and that’s not true just in case of America. In the part of the world where I come from–South Asia–it’s the same. It’s simply because modern-day liberals have never quite appreciated the importance of the individual.
Or take the immigration debate as an example. I am here in this country on a student visa on which I face 20 restrictions including inability to work outside the school e.t.c. I frequently hear from liberal website like Daily kos how the HIB process is used to undermine the American labor e.t.c. e.t.c. Fine. Every country has the right to decide its legal framework and if America does not want me, I will pack my bags and go home. But then I hear from the same guys how illegal immigrants need to be legalized and opposition to that is, by it self, racist. Excuse me. So people who actually followed the law, got their papers right, stood in long lines outside the embassy, worked hard to get admission in good schools, and pay good money for that education and now want to work are somehow not welcome but people who simply slipped across the border must be legalized. What kind of bloody hypocrisy is that. Or the liberal worry over sweatshops in India or China. Stop being so fucking condescending. Yes, these countries are poor and people work for less than desirable wages. But hey, liberals will argue that they should operate in the same conditions as Americans knowing fully well that will means they won’t have any jobs. What a brilliant case of bloody hypocrisy. Or should I say classical European behavior? The bastards in old Europe lecture America which all said and done remains the most welcoming country in the world while carefully guarding their racial composition. Indeed, if counting minorities is the liberal criterion, when is Europe going to elect a Black man?
So, please. STOP. Desist. And spend more time, evaluating your own conduct before pointing fingers at others.
rightistliberal on October 10, 2009 at 12:51 PM
In this day and age, I have never figured out why the Leftists think we’re racists. I see lots of racism among the Left, but they just deny it.
Welcome, Anita. I enjoyed reading your story.
jediwebdude on October 10, 2009 at 1:01 PM
I’m glad to see anyone finding peace with themselves. I wish more could, and it’s quite possible that more can if they only open their eyes and look past the hatred and biases the left promotes.
Bleedsblue is angry because Anita decided for herself what gives her peace and it has nothing to do with the fascism of the progressives. A wonderful contrast, Anita vs people like bleedsblue. Anyone can look at the words offered by either and see quite clearly who is on the path of faith, individual freedom, and personal responsibility.
Spiritk9 on October 10, 2009 at 1:08 PM
What a nice story, thanks for posting that!
Irenaeus on October 10, 2009 at 1:12 PM
This is one of the most moving pieces I’ve read about conversion. I live in liberal lala land in Northern N. And being a conservative is something to be ashamed of. There were times that I tried searching for something in liberalism that I can agree with to conform. But it felt so out of place. I was at home with conservatism.
I come from a Cuban-Chinese immigrant family. My parents were immensly proud of this country for accepting them with open arms when they came here legally. Conservatism made sense because of it values: work hard, individualism, success for any one who wants it, less government, and freedom. Reagan was above and beyond a great leader and ambassador of all that is good with this country. He did not treat people like special interest groups or an evil nation as liberals so often do. He spoke to them about American exceptionalism and how the individual is reveared. How welcoming.
cubachi on October 10, 2009 at 1:19 PM
Actually, a good portion of MonCrief’s essay concerns race, and that strikes me as having a great deal (maybe everything) to do with Ed (or AP) posting it.
Not saying that’s good or bad. It simply is.
MrScribbler on October 10, 2009 at 1:35 PM
OK, class, see how getalife here capitalizes the word “black”?
Del Dolemonte on October 10, 2009 at 1:36 PM
Welcome home, Anita.
Proud to have you as part of the family.
thebronze on October 10, 2009 at 1:38 PM
Thanks for sharing your racism with us, kid.
Must suck to be you.
Del Dolemonte on October 10, 2009 at 1:41 PM
We will certainly need that fortitude to start over again after the next three plus years.
She never really left. Catholicism puts great emphasis on the works which it views must be a natural consequence of faith. I see in Anita’s brief description an attempt to perform those works. We all wander in the desert for a bit occasionally.
Liberalism was certainly tried in the early Church, and we can see the results in Scripture. It’s obvious that, in the community, there were those who professed faith but did not work. There were those who shared all they had. The juxtaposition of the two is where the Gospel resides. Consider Mark 10:21-22, which preach a voluntary communism. The other side (which is that true Christians are moved to works), is echoed in the writings of the Didache, which, like 1 Timothy 5:13, is an observation of operational Christianity:
The hallmark of all these observations are what I would call “guarded charity”, which is why one takes a homeless person to a restaurant to feed him or her, but does not give them money directly. I have had many homeless people walk away when I offer them food in this manner, and a lesser number stay and take me up on my offer. I suspect that those who walked away wanted not food but their next fix or another bottle of wine or beer.
Beware the Christ-monger (those who would take advantage of your belief in Christ).
unclesmrgol on October 10, 2009 at 1:46 PM
Anita, thank you so much for sharing your story. I, too, tried on liberalism and found myself living inconsistently. It’s a matter of truth vs. error, certainly. We can’t live a lie for long.
I welcome you and am excited about having yet another strong voice such as yours on the right team. :)
Diane on October 10, 2009 at 1:49 PM
Welcome :)
beachgirlusa on October 10, 2009 at 1:56 PM
I’m a gay minoriteh and never in my life have flinched from being conservative. It’s too early in the morning to give my reasons, but I live in a deep blue land of progressive fuckw!ts.
Apologetic California on October 10, 2009 at 2:03 PM
This one sentence seems to fit the bill.
forest on October 10, 2009 at 2:04 PM
Translation: We own black people. We bought and paid for them, so they better stay on our plantation of dependency and victimhood, where we hand out just enough money to keep them poor and in their place.
We will also scare the hell out of them with fairy tales of evil racists on the other side of the fence, while portraying any blacks who join them as traitors.
RadClown on October 10, 2009 at 2:07 PM
I’ve come to the conclusion that the democrats are slavers. They were then. They still are now.
Chaz706 on October 10, 2009
Absolutely right. But the hell of it is that today’s slaves toil willingly on liberal plantations, forging their own chains and wearing them without question, happy for the meager crumbs tossed their way. And if you suggest they break their chains and be truly free, you are called “racist”.
SKYFOX on October 10, 2009 at 2:08 PM
What a beautiful and inspiring story. Welcome!
Cylor on October 10, 2009 at 2:12 PM
Anita, you have written a beautiful piece and I admire your courage, honesty and clarity of thought.
Welcome!
PoodleSkirt on October 10, 2009 at 2:14 PM
The post was beautiful, and I especially took heart to these words… ” Friends who are still radicals rail at me for loving a country that enslaved us, and I tell them I don’t. I love a country that had the guts to stand up time and time again and right a wrong. A country that is not afraid to pick itself up and start again.”
You are a most enlightened person, Miss Anita, and I wish you well in life, and God bless you!
capejasmine on October 10, 2009 at 2:19 PM
Conservatism is a state of mind; liberalism is a belief system.
RickZ on October 10, 2009 at 2:21 PM
Christians and Conservatives will allow you to make your own discoveries, or we will accompany you whichever you wish. Either way, we feel that it is strictly a personal decision.
Mr. Grump on October 10, 2009 at 2:36 PM
Anita, welcome to adulthood.
Wade on October 10, 2009 at 2:48 PM
Bleeds Blue:
Do the “free thinkers” on the Left ever do any of their own thinking?
You wrote:
The modern Conservative movement is defined by a man who voted against the Civil Rights Act, one who used racism to turn the “solid south” Republican and one who pissed on the graves of dead civil rights workers when he announced his candidacy.
Barry Goldwater voted against the CRA because he thought it was unconstitutional. It is called sticking to your principles. Especially, if you believe that there are limits on federal power. However, Everitt Dirksen, the leader of the Republicans in the Senate, was responsible for its passage by getting enough Republicans to vote for it (the vast majority of the caucus). Why is that important? Because the Senate was majority Democrat and could easily have passed it by their majority votes but for the racists in their caucus.
The “Southern Strategy” was a strategy employed in the 1968 election to pull white voters away from the Democrats. It was designed to pull those voters away when their Democrat choice was Humphrey and race-baiting George Wallace. What has and continues to pull the South away from the Democrat party nationally are cultural and economic issues. Roe v. Wade did more to kill the Democrat party electorally in the South than anything else. The racist idiots in the Democrat Party in 1968 were still there in 1972, 1976 and 1980 or out supporting Wallace. Moreover, there are more people from other sections of the country living in the South now more than ever. Are you saying that all the racists moved to the South? It is a convenient myth that the Left circulates that the Republican Party was what held back civil rights in the 1960′s. It expiates a century of political hatred and racism by that party.
Lastly, Reagan spoke at a country fair in Mississippi. Did he speak in praise of the murderers of the three civil rights workers? Hell no. This myth is perpetuated to prop up the narrative of “nice guy subliminal racism” of his presidency.
Lastly, name any Republican national politician who has sought to repeal civil rights legislation or any state politician who has campaigned to restore Jim Crow. You can’t do it because they do not exist.
All of these talking points are rhetorical devices employed to undeservedly shore up political support for the Democrat Party which has done more to hurt Americans of African descent than any other political organization in American history.
Bearing the burden of a loathsome history on civil rights and race relations, conservatives then turn to marketing, making the very few prominent African Americans who have chosen to link arms with them into spokesmodels, in order to obscure the reality of their views.
Read the above. The party that has a loathsome and despicable history on civil rights is the Democrat Party.
What disturbs you is that folks who question your narrative. It is what has frightened every Leftist revolutionary since Marx and Engalls.
amor de cosmos on October 10, 2009 at 2:49 PM
Ms. Moncrief’s story struck a powerful chord with me. Although I am not a person of color (I am a white male), most of my adult life was spent as a liberal’s liberal. Before my journey to conservatism, I accepted the liberal dogma without question. I was fortunate to have friends and coworkers who led me to a conservative view of our country and the world. I am grateful to have had such people in my life. And as with Ms. Moncrief, I have an inner peace that comes from finding my true belief system, a system that believes in the spirit and dignity of man (and woman) and that liberty is most possible if conservative principles are imbued in public policy.
WordsMatter on October 10, 2009 at 3:03 PM
THat’s what is great about America, everyone can have an opinion. Remember different people, like different authors.
It’s a matter of taste. I like her style, it’s not pretentious like so may other writers.
Jeff from WI on October 10, 2009 at 3:14 PM
many
Jeff from WI on October 10, 2009 at 3:14 PM
Anita,
Thanks for writing this. It’s the most encouraging thing I’ve read all week.
Glad you’re on the conservative team!
NebCon on October 10, 2009 at 3:18 PM
There was so much stupidity in your post, it made me vomit.
Goldwater, Reagan and Bork were all against the CRA and later admitted that stance was wrong. If it had not been for the courage and leadership of liberal Democrats like JFK and LBJ, African-Americans would still be living under Jim Crow toady.
Those racist idiots like Strom Thurmond and Jesse Helms left the Democrats and joined the Republicans. At least George Wallace repented.
Here dumbass, read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Helms
He[Jesse Helms] was perhaps the last unreconstructed Southern conservative that started his political career in the Democratic Party when that party symbolized racial segregation and transitioned in the early 1970s to being a Republican. Helms was an outspoken conservative who opposed many progressive policies regarding race such as school integration, the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act. Helms also reminded voters that he tried, with a 16-day filibuster, to stop the Senate from approving a federal holiday to honor Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
Any Republican/conservative who thinks the Republicans and not the Democrats are responsible for civil rights for African-Americans is an idiot who’s only fooling himself/herself.
Norman Blizter on October 10, 2009 at 3:31 PM
And it IS the conservatives. I left GOP politics 20 years ago; it was working directly on issues via the Tea Parties that brought me back. I haven’t met a nicer bunch of people in a long time.
michaelo on October 10, 2009 at 3:32 PM
***
Anita Moncreif shows why a good Christian education and upbringing is so important. God’s rules and teaching give us the moral compass to guide us into better lives.
***
It’s no accident that she evaluated her life and came up with the right answers. Like the old joke says, “A conservative is just a liberal with experience!” Welcome aboard, Anita. I used to be a democrat long ago until I got my “epiphany” with Lyndon Johnson.
***
Supposed “racism” is just another useful tool–like “eliminating poverty”, “global warming”, etc. that the “democRAT” / liberal / socialist / statist / marxist / communist President Obama (PBUH) and his ilk use as CRISIS events to forward their agenda of changing the U.S.A. into the new United Socialist States of Amerikka.
***
John Bibb
***
rocketman on October 10, 2009 at 3:34 PM
Why is it that liberals take such pleasure in bringing up the history of our country from 150 years ago, pointing to it as a stain on our current country, and yet they have no problem with people like William Ayres, who but for the grace of God would have killed people just a few decades ago, and still believes that he “didn’t do enough” toward that end?
.
And BleedsBlue, you didn’t see a lot of black people at the 9-12 march because those that do express conservative views are ostracized, belittled and attacked by people like you, especially those in their own community. It takes a lot of courage for someone who is “supposed” to be liberal to openly deny that “genetic imperative.” Anita is obviously one of those courageous people.
iurockhead on October 10, 2009 at 3:46 PM
God Bless You Anita for this post. And welcome home!
nater1976 on October 10, 2009 at 3:46 PM
God Bless you and may your ways brings others to us…This Greatest Nation On Earth is in dire need of more souls like you. Together we stand…divide us and we fall.
hawkman on October 10, 2009 at 3:57 PM
Welcome home, Anita!
deedledee on October 10, 2009 at 3:59 PM
Kudos Anita! As a “once upon a time” liberal I was treated like a puppet too. Like you, I have never felt freer then now. A most enlightening experience.
elclynn on October 10, 2009 at 4:36 PM
You know, some of us black conservatives take offense at your blatant racism.
mizflame98 on October 10, 2009 at 4:46 PM
What a nice, calm, soothing, rational voice.
MORE!!!!!!
fred5678 on October 10, 2009 at 4:50 PM
Isn’t he? It surely can’t be anything he’s done — even your side is admitting that in the Nobel Peace Prize discussion. As the LA Times (usually “in the tank” for him) put it on the front page today,
Let’s see, if it isn’t his accomplishments that got him elected, what else could it be?
unclesmrgol on October 10, 2009 at 4:54 PM
Hey Novell, you want something proven without a doubt?
Your mother should have kept her legs closed.
seejanemom on October 10, 2009 at 5:07 PM
Thank you, Anita, and welcome.
pugwriter on October 10, 2009 at 5:08 PM
Or,
A conservative is a liberal who’s been mugged.
or even better
A conservative is a liberal who has been mugged by the Government
or
If you are young and conservative, you have no heart; if you are old and liberal, you have no brain.
unclesmrgol on October 10, 2009 at 5:11 PM
Wow! That’s my story, except I’m latino and male.
lperello on October 10, 2009 at 10:42 AM
Same as me. Boricua and woman. Perello is a last name I have seen in PR–not connected with PR politics? ;D
ProudPalinFan on October 10, 2009 at 5:21 PM
13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments — created by the Republicans
Civil Rights Act of 1866 — created by the Republicans
[this is the act which Obama can call upon to prove he is a United States Citizen, in spite of his father's nationality]
Civil Rights Act of 1871 — created by the Republicans
Civil Rights Act of 1875 — created by the Republicans
Civil Rights Act of 1957 — created by the Republicans [note: John F. Kennedy and Lyndon Baines Johnson both voted against this one]
Civil Rights Act of 1960 — created by the Republicans, and filibustered by the Democrats
Civil Rights Act of 1964 — created by the Republicans (passed by a majority of 82% Republicans and 69% Democrats)
Civil Rights Act of 1968 — created by the Democrats (but passed by a majority of the Republicans)
Civil Rights Act of 1991 — created by the Democrats (but passed by a majority of the Republicans)
I think Republicans can more than hold their heads up high.
This puts everything into perspective:
unclesmrgol on October 10, 2009 at 5:34 PM
I know. That Martin Luther King Jr. guy was a Republican and he didn’t do squat.
RadClown on October 10, 2009 at 5:50 PM
One argument (sic) replete with insults:
Another, with just lots of FACTS, not many insults:
DoI see a pattern here???
fred5678 on October 10, 2009 at 6:00 PM
I’m just glad that you have seen the light.
mullethead on October 10, 2009 at 6:04 PM
Dont forget Senator KKK Byrd.
faol on October 10, 2009 at 12:06 PM
Nuh – uh !!! He can’t possibly be racist! Know why ?? ‘Cause he is a democrat !!!! That’s why ! So there !!
//
cableguy615 on October 10, 2009 at 6:21 PM
Any Republican/conservative who thinks the Republicans and not the Democrats are responsible for civil rights for African-Americans is an idiot who’s only fooling himself/herself.
Norman Blizter on October 10, 2009 at 3:31 PM
Hey dipsh*t! Abe Lincoln freed the slaves ! I’ll give you three guesses what party he was with.
cableguy615 on October 10, 2009 at 6:24 PM
http://www.claremont.org/publications/crb/id.928/article_detail.asp
Read this, and then slap yourself upside the head for being such an insulting and offensive twit.
Ryan Gandy on October 10, 2009 at 6:35 PM
Any person who thinks that one party, above another, was responsible, is an idiot. It took many different kinds of Americans to right the wrongs. No party is responsible. Neither party should get credit.
All parties should get credit for righting the wrongs and moving forward.
Now, since we have moved forward…you should join us.
bridgetown on October 10, 2009 at 6:36 PM
Could it be that Breeds Grue is a inverse racist?
Naw….. never.
Dhuka on October 10, 2009 at 6:36 PM
Norman Blizter on October 10, 2009 at 3:31 PM
Hey Einstein, read some American history. The Democrat Party was the party of white supremecy. The KKK and Jim Crow were inventions of that party. My point is how Democrats like you have amnesia which lets you believe civil rights history started in 1964. As others have ably demonstrated here, that is just not so.
It is a convenient myth (one of hundreds) that Democrats tell themselves that they are singlehandedly brought the rights of full citizenship to Americans of African descent. That is pure bunk. Moreover, it is only fitting that Democrats in the 1960′s began to disown the despicable racist policies they enacted in law over the previous 100 years.
Lastly, citing Wikipedia as an authority on anything shows that you are a cretin.
amor de cosmos on October 10, 2009 at 6:52 PM
I was one of the first to comment on her story before it made the big board. Then when it made the big board, people were STILL just commenting on the story, usually saying it was a great story and well written. Who caused it to devolve into a race thing. I didn’t see race even mentioned in the early comments. Why does it have to be about race? Why not simply, Anita, non-hyphenated American?
Jeff from WI on October 10, 2009 at 6:57 PM
Describe moving forward. Then maybe some of us will consider it.
As for one party vs. another, we have for certain that one party treasures the rights of the individual above the group, and the other party treasures the group above the individual. Somewhere is a center, and that center for me is the statement I quoted from the Didach, which says that it is an individual work to help someone in need who presents themselves for help, but that one should not help those who will do nothing to help themselves.
In other words, voluntary contributions to the group are in order, but only to those people in the group who will contribute both to themselves and to others.
When the contributions become expected by the group, to the point where the group amasses the power to take the contribution against the will of the putative giver, where do we go from there?
The legitimate uses of Government — Caesar, if you will — is for defense of the nation — the group — and the guaranteeing of individual rights.
It’s the nature of those individual rights where the direction of “moving forward” differs between the parties.
I’d rather choose my own charities, if you will. That defines which party holds my current allegiance.
unclesmrgol on October 10, 2009 at 6:59 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »