Obama to supporters: I’m sharing this award with everyone who’s “dared to hope”
posted at 7:41 pm on October 9, 2009 by Allahpundit
This award — and the call to action that comes with it — does not belong simply to me or my administration; it belongs to all people around the world who have fought for justice and for peace. And most of all, it belongs to you, the men and women of America, who have dared to hope and have worked so hard to make our world a little better.
What does “hope” mean in this case? The Journal elaborates:
The Norwegians are on to something. In a mere nine months, the President has promulgated a vision for the U.S. role in the world that breaks with both Republican and Democratic predecessors. Madeleine Albright, Bill Clinton’s Secretary of State, called America the “indispensable nation” a decade ago. Ronald Reagan called it a “city on the Hill,” an example to the world.
Mr. Obama sees the U.S. differently, as weaker than it was and the rest of the planet as stronger, and so he calls for a humbler America, at best a first among equals, working primarily through the U.N. The world’s challenges, he emphasized yesterday, “can’t be met by any one leader or any one nation.” What this suggests to us—and to the Norwegians—is the end of what has been called “American exceptionalism.” This is the view that U.S. values have universal application and should be promoted without apology, and defended with military force when necessary.
CNN chooses a slightly — but only slightly — different frame of analysis, one that seems to be shared by our new “smart power” State Department: “Certainly from our standpoint, this gives us a sense of momentum — when the United States has accolades tossed its way, rather than shoes.” Meanwhile, Politico’s excited to find that three of the five Norwegians on the committee are hard leftists (one of them a bona fide socialist), but does it really matter? European “conservatives” are about as far right as Joe Lieberman; you could have stacked the panel with Norway’s equivalent of Reagan Republicans and still gotten the same unanimous vote for The One that you got this time. The Gipper ended the Cold War and never got a Nobel nod. This is an institutional issue, not a membership one.
Exit question: If Hillary had been elected last year, would she have gotten the prize today?
Update: Via Greg Hengler. Dare.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Whatever it is, I hope he FAILS because it won’t be good for America.
Schadenfreude on October 9, 2009 at 8:26 PM
Again, here we go with the hubris. Obama and his ilk think he is the first person on earth to want peace and ONLY Obama was capable of talking about what should be done.
csdeven on October 9, 2009 at 8:27 PM
I dare to hope Precedent Toonces gets 86ed in 2012 and back to the richly deserved obscurity of someone who had no serious qualifications and no real job before he ascended to his throne of celebrity-in-chief.
Dr. Carlo Lombardi on October 9, 2009 at 8:28 PM
Oh I’m daring to hope but it isn’t at all close to what he’s talking about.
How do you spell hope?
I-M-P-E-A-C-H
Monica on October 9, 2009 at 8:29 PM
Well there goes dinner. Vomit.
milwife88 on October 9, 2009 at 8:31 PM
Rush Limbaugh
Schadenfreude on October 9, 2009 at 8:32 PM
A call to action or a call to prayer? Since we are a Muslim nation, according to Obama.
Q: When will the Professional Bowlers Association pull their collective heads out and put Obama in the Pro Bowlers Hall Of Fame? He scored a 129 people, 129!!!.
dthorny on October 9, 2009 at 8:33 PM
It wasn’t a Nobel Peace Award. It was a Piece of Crap award. He’s brown, soft, mushy and stinks.
suzyk on October 9, 2009 at 8:33 PM
It’s kinda like “How many angels fit on the head of a pin”: All of them.
eeyore on October 9, 2009 at 8:33 PM
In that case Mr President, I say nope to hope.
thebrokenrattle on October 9, 2009 at 8:34 PM
Is Charity one of the Latin American girls that ACORN wanted to bring to the U.S. as a hooker?
malclave on October 9, 2009 at 8:34 PM
Share the prize with everyone who’s dared to hope?
Well, factoring in just Americans…it comes to less than a nickel each.
Thank you, Barrack Obama, for your largesse./
coldwarrior on October 9, 2009 at 8:34 PM
I thought it was called the “Nobel Peace Prize”. So, we have our deadliest months in Afghanistan, Iran and North Korea launching missiles, hiding facilities, and testing nukes with regularity…. oh and the pirate situation, and he’s somehow a symbol of peace?
Look, if you want to create something called the “Nobel Hope Prize”, then be my guest, and then feel free to award it to this turd who offers us not much more than “Hope” (as a slogan, not actual hope).
RightWinged on October 9, 2009 at 8:35 PM
I’m sorta, kinda hoping he’ll share some of the prize money with me. Does that count?
Blaise on October 9, 2009 at 8:36 PM
OK, who hear wants to nominated Obama AGAIN next year? Yes we can! I say if he’s not awarded the prize, we march on Washington!
MeatHeadinCA on October 9, 2009 at 8:36 PM
Obama is America’s Neville Chamberlain.
dthorny on October 9, 2009 at 8:37 PM
Awards! They do nothing but give out awards! I can’t believe it. Greatest fascist dictator, Adolf Hitler!
The Ugly American on October 9, 2009 at 8:37 PM
ObamaFlav…Humbled by Nobel Peace Prize
misslizzi on October 9, 2009 at 8:37 PM
*hear = here
MeatHeadinCA on October 9, 2009 at 8:38 PM
Put the buzz in Nancy Pelosi’s ear that Obamao is now eligible to be heavily taxed for windfall profits.
onlineanalyst on October 9, 2009 at 8:39 PM
Ridiculous! Ridiculous! Ridiculous! [waves wand]
Obama turns into Michelle Obama accepting HER award…
In other news:
The federal Government annexs the entire state of South Dakota to commence construction of Obama’s Rushmore portrait.
docjohn52 on October 9, 2009 at 8:39 PM
And that nickel places you in the top tax bracket needed for government run healthcare. Your Government working for YOU.
dthorny on October 9, 2009 at 8:39 PM
Need to add Minnesota, Iowa, Wyoming and Montana for his ears.
dthorny on October 9, 2009 at 8:41 PM
I hear Charlie Rangle Is giving Dear Leader advice on how to “forget” to pay taxes on the $1.4M. After all, he writes the tax code, so he should know!
Dingbat63 on October 9, 2009 at 8:42 PM
In a related story:
Congress immediately votes for 1.4 Trillion dollars for the “Stimulous Construction Sign”
docjohn52 on October 9, 2009 at 8:43 PM
Obama wants to keep the ceremony low-key. So instead of Oslo, they’re just going to have a small gathering at Golgotha.
misterpeasea on October 9, 2009 at 8:45 PM
That’s why he keeps Geithner around.
SagebrushPuppet on October 9, 2009 at 8:45 PM
Jeez, O’Reilly is spinning 100 mph. Of course, what he’s saying is crapola. I’m going to test his theory and head to Europe and walk out of a restaurant without paying and when stopped just shriek: “Obama Damn You!” According to Bill-Oh!, they’ll genuflect and back off and I’ll be on my way.
Marcus on October 9, 2009 at 8:46 PM
Schadenfreude on October 9, 2009 at 8:48 PM
Pronouns used in a 50 second speech…..
17
It’s all about “The One”!
csdeven on October 9, 2009 at 8:49 PM
Nice one!
docjohn52 on October 9, 2009 at 8:52 PM
“a call to action”
Wasn’t that a line from that Lib President movie uttered by Ben Kingsley in his role as a VP taking the reigns as P after the Boss strokes out while offering up some “charity” to a staffer?
Maybe the TOTUS was running the movie instead of his intended remarks? “Thanks gobs. Am I a god yet?”
Robert17 on October 9, 2009 at 8:54 PM
No. I think only Mt. McKinley will be big enough for his inflated head.
Aviator on October 9, 2009 at 8:54 PM
oh, I had big hopes too.
I called it a 401k.
stevezilla on October 9, 2009 at 8:55 PM
Send the idiots a letter of support! Its good therapy!
Contact
Postal address and phone number
Postal address: The Nobel Foundation
P.O. Box 5232, SE-102 45 Stockholm, Sweden
Street address: Sturegatan 14, Stockholm
Tel. +46 (0)8 663 09 20
Fax +46 (0)8 660 38 47
E-mail info@nobel.se
JohnD9207 on October 9, 2009 at 8:58 PM
Guess this prize solidly confirms what we suspected/knew all along: Obama’s a socialist.
misslizzi on October 9, 2009 at 8:58 PM
empty words. empty suit. empty head.
jbh45 on October 9, 2009 at 8:59 PM
Obama is sharing it? But he won. =P
modnar on October 9, 2009 at 9:04 PM
What’s the big deal?
Blame it on TurboTax.
malclave on October 9, 2009 at 9:09 PM
I’d only consider one of them “hard leftist”, but from a conservative Republican view, I guess anything to the left of Bush is “hard left”?
The Norwegian Labour Party is not leftist, it runs a coalition government consisting of it, the Socialist Left Party, and the Center Party, which is the remnants of a party for farmers.
The Labour Party is so large (35% of voters) that it doesn’t risk being too far to either side of an issue, but heavily in the pocket of the coalition of labor unions (naturally).
Anyways, I’d blame the Norwegian media more than anything for all of this, for feeding this group of committee members and almost endless stream of Pravda-like news on Obama the Messiah.
Or as I suspect, this doesn’t really have anything to do with politics, it has more to do with creating a PR stunt to get Norway some attention, not to mentioning the obligatory visit by Obama to Oslo to receive the prize.
If I were to read the tea leaves, I’d say the decision came down to the fact that Obama was:
1. The only likable name on the list that was recognizable
2. The person they’d most like to meet personally
3. The person who could net Norway and Oslo the most PR and perhaps commercial benefit
The rationale they gave for giving him the prize was probably just window-dressing.
Seixon on October 9, 2009 at 9:11 PM
I have a physics degree. I hope to conduct a physics experiment in the near future.
Can I get my Nobel Prize in Physics now?
Or, as Sideshow Bob would say, “‘Attempted murder’? Now honestly, what is that? Do they give a Nobel prize for attempted chemistry?”
Maybe they do, Bob. Maybe they do.
ynot4tony2 on October 9, 2009 at 9:14 PM
Oh yes, they were not throwing shoes at him, just their underwear
Terrye on October 9, 2009 at 9:14 PM
anyone watch The Office last night??? Remember the vomit scene? Seems apropos.
Diane on October 9, 2009 at 9:23 PM
I hate George W. Bush and everything he stands for.
Where’s my Nobel Peace Prize?
misterpeasea on October 9, 2009 at 9:24 PM
I’ve dared to hope! I want my cut of the $1.4 million.
rbj on October 9, 2009 at 9:27 PM
I thought he said “shared their dope”.
thomasaur on October 9, 2009 at 9:30 PM
No, they have their tongues up his cheeks, of a different kind.
Schadenfreude on October 9, 2009 at 9:30 PM
Five Norwegians hope that Barry “humbles” America into international obscurity. Barry hopes to “humble” America into an international joke. America hopes Barry takes his humble prize and goes home to Kenya.
anXdem on October 9, 2009 at 9:33 PM
Bizarro world, the first time I’ve agreed with Obummer
“This is not what expected to wake up to either”
I’ll bet if I call 911 right now, it’ll say “Press 2 for english.”
docjohn52 on October 9, 2009 at 9:34 PM
Amazing, isn’t it. But maybe his complete lack of any actual “cause” will be beneficial in the long term. He’s the Entourage President. And frankly, he’s probably less damaging this way, with no cause except for himself: No withdrawal from Afghanistan, Health Care reform is stuck, etc. (Sure, the budget is out of control, but it has been for many administrations.)
Besides, the Nobel Peace prize has always been a joke. So what if some important “peaceful” figures have done something to “deserve” it? It’s a ridiculous award given out by self-important fools. It is the ultimate in B.S. so why shouldn’t Barack Obama win it?
July 10 on October 9, 2009 at 9:36 PM
Dope on a rope.
GnuBreed on October 9, 2009 at 9:36 PM
Upon reading the tea leaves
“You bastards are not doing your job, you socialist filth”
- – Mr. Nobel, convulsing from his grave
Schadenfreude on October 9, 2009 at 9:36 PM
And their room keys.
uncivilized on October 9, 2009 at 9:38 PM
I dare to hope. I hope Barack Obama is one termer.
Terrye on October 9, 2009 at 9:41 PM
New campaign theme for the one…
marc@hubsandspokes on October 9, 2009 at 9:44 PM
I’ve dared to hope… I think. So do I email the White House to get my share of the prize money, or will there be a line on the tax forms where I can claim the credit?
Jeff M (Formerly Jeff_McAwesome) on October 9, 2009 at 9:47 PM
Looks to me like an effort by the globalists to boost the already failed Ogabe regime. This is blowing up in their faces already and exposing the pompous ass empty suit for all to see. Also, American Spectator has a blog post saying that Ogabe was contacted in APRIL 2008 about this Piss Prize, for approval to move on with the process.
masterofelke on October 9, 2009 at 9:48 PM
Because 0 has never accomplished anything and is always looking for his next ‘job’ his future goal is beginning to be realized:
He will be selected the next Secretary General of the UN. While there is an apparent block on this, he will secretly confide certain facts to the UN. Then he will leave the office of president and assume the UN position in 1/1/12 after he declares his legal Kenyan citizenship.
Oleta on October 9, 2009 at 9:49 PM
So… um…
He received the Nobel Prize because people would like peace in the middle east?
A world without nuclear weapons?
For justice and peace?
And Obama has done what again to further those goals?
Oh, that’s right…
Jack… Squat.
12thMonkey on October 9, 2009 at 9:53 PM
Obama’s new t-shirt: I went to Copenhagen to lobby for the Olympics, and all I got was this lousy Nobel Peace Prize.
Queen0fCups on October 9, 2009 at 9:54 PM
what a load of tripe.
Midas on October 9, 2009 at 9:59 PM
And their cookies… oh, wait, that’s us.
malclave on October 9, 2009 at 10:02 PM
A desperate move, huh? Makes sense.
Didn’t realize nominees were contacted. So Obama was not so surprised this morning, after all? I’m not surprised.
misslizzi on October 9, 2009 at 10:03 PM
He that lives upon hope will die fasting.
Benjamin Franklin
crosspatch on October 9, 2009 at 10:05 PM
How much of the 1.4 goes to ACORN?
RobCon on October 9, 2009 at 10:06 PM
Correct, no one has thrown shoes at him. The IOC delivered quite a body blow, though, recently.
Gibbsy looks all choked up and serious-like there, like Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. Cue the music…
PattyJ on October 9, 2009 at 10:11 PM
How does this hope thing work? Can I claim that my beloved Packers are 4-0 because I HOPED they would have an offensive line rather than a 5-man revolving door?
PackerBronco on October 9, 2009 at 10:24 PM
I dare to hope. He just wouldn’t like the things I’m hoping.
Jim Treacher on October 9, 2009 at 10:47 PM
Just an anecdotal aside, but one that fills me with HOPE: my academic husband (on a pretty liberal campus, but I repeat myself) tells me that his grad students were saying variations on “WTF?” today in the corridors. Looks like the DNC should go into damage limitation mode pronto…
Fortunata on October 9, 2009 at 11:08 PM
Wait, millions and millions is a decided minority in a world of 6.5 billion people!
We are doing all this because a fraction of the world has hope?
David
LifeTrek on October 9, 2009 at 11:10 PM
Thanks! I just sent them an e-mail nominating myself for the 2010 prize.
SagebrushPuppet on October 9, 2009 at 11:16 PM
I hope I win the Powerball, because pretty soon that will be the only way to make a buck in this country…I hope I hope I hope…
Terrye on October 9, 2009 at 11:17 PM
No but Bill would have had a shot at more “piece” prizes in the Oral Office.
chickasaw42 on October 9, 2009 at 11:50 PM
Sorry, guys, but that is not what “American exceptionalism” is. Defending our interests abroad has nothing to do with “American exceptionalism”. That is just a matter of the nation working in the interests of its citizenry. “American exceptionalism” goes more to Divine Providence and that idea that Americans are a sort of chosen people, which I believe. That’s why there will be dissolution before a downfall. Parts of America, itself, will strive to exist, with the foundations and traditions we love. And that new America will outperform the old US the same way that the US had outperformed the world.
progressoverpeace on October 10, 2009 at 1:07 AM
My 16-year-old came home from school today absolutely steaming. He said they might as well give the prize to Mickey Mouse next year, he has done as much for world peace as Barack Obama. He can’t wait until 2012 so he can vote against Obama.
rockmom on October 10, 2009 at 1:37 AM
European intellectuals hate America because they know America took the best, brightest, and boldest adventurers from Europe, leaving behind an inferior gene pool. Our restless adventurousness has led to discoveries and wealth and knowledge and generosity that has far surpassed Europe’s. Europe’s is a tired culture that has nothing left to stand for.
rockmom on October 10, 2009 at 1:41 AM
In my continuing effort to avoid scandal and media scrutiny, I’ll leave my hopes unspoken as well.
But I will say that for the first time I can think of, Obama failed to meet my expectations. Any person with even the slightest sense of decency would have rejected this ridiculous recognition in favor of any of the millions of people who are more deserving. I actually thought more of Obama than to believe he would accept this, and so he is — unbelievably — diminished in my estimation. I didn’t think it possible.
Jaibones on October 10, 2009 at 2:30 AM
” I dared to hope..to hope you fail”
Jeff from WI on October 10, 2009 at 6:00 AM
First off, since he’s presently in Office, he should not accept the award nor the money, which would not be his anyway if he does “accept” it. As President, he’s barred from accepting gifts and such influences as this (by the Constitution, that document he seems oddly unaware of whenever any important issue comes up).
IF he accepts the award while in office (as per his embarrassing speech yesterday), and IF, as he says also, that he’ll “donate the money to unnamed charities,” I’d like to remind everyone that IT WON’T BE HIS MONEY TO DONATE.
As property, the money belongs to the nation. Obama’s got no place to even put his hands on it, even to “donate” it.
BUT AS PRESIDENT, he should NOT accept this award while in office. Wait ’till January 2013 when he’s out of office, THEN accept it, do whatever he wants with it and the money.
As President, I do believe should Obama go through with accepting this “Prize,” that he’s compromised demonstratively as President, and certainly he’s violating the Constitutional dimensions of the public office that he holds at the moment.
Lourdes on October 10, 2009 at 7:14 AM
The “Prize” and Obama accepting it — despite it being barred by the Constitution while he’s in the Presidency — represents undue influence upon a U.S. President by foreign influences (as yet unnamed and it looks like we won’t know who nominated him until 50 years from now, foreign or domestic).
Regardless of who nominated Obama for this Prize, the honus is on Barack Obama to uphold the requirements of his position; I do believe him accepting this Prize represents a severe compromise to the Presidency.
Lourdes on October 10, 2009 at 7:17 AM
Yes, nominations were closed by January 12, just DAYS AFTER Obama moved into the White House (not even two weeks after), AND all nominees were notified before end of January 2009.
So Obama’s soapy speech yesterday was also another one of his failed performances. He knew he’d been nominated and that was not even two weeks into the White House.
As I’m sure all the DNC was also aware. WHICH EXPLAINS much if not all of Obama’s world-tour-dissing-the-USA all these months since January of this year.
Obama was well informed he’d been nominated way back in January 2009. His surprise as he called it in his speech yesterday was more of that bad acting he’s now well known for.
Lourdes on October 10, 2009 at 7:22 AM
As I understand it, nominees were notified before end of January 2009 after the nominations were closed on January 12, 2009. So Obama moreorless BEGAN the Presidency with the knowledge he’d been nominated for the Peace Prize. As also aware, I am sure of it, has been the entire Democratic Party in their blubbering hysterics from Congress.
Lourdes on October 10, 2009 at 7:24 AM
Answer: No.
By the way Bill Clinton (and many others – Putin, for example) must be livid over this award to Obama. Clinton could probably list a lot of reasons why he thinks he should got it.
Lots of world leaders are saying to themselves, we helped elevate Obama in the international world, let him chair the Security Council UN meeting, defer to him out of courtesy at other meetings (let him stand in the middle of the photo op), etc. That “be nice to the Obama” treatment is officially ending.
Kind of like having a baseball team of veteran players then the new guy shows up, plays half an inning and is suddenly inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame.
Obama will be treated differently now by other world leaders.
albill on October 10, 2009 at 7:36 AM
Affirmative action at it’s logical conclusion.
KyserS on October 10, 2009 at 7:43 AM
Joke.
hawkdriver on October 10, 2009 at 8:12 AM
Since the Nobel Peace Prize committee is made up of members of the Norwegian Parliament, the Prize has become Norway`s method of becoming a voice in world politics.
Norway is a far out of the way, cold, wet, small nobody country in the world and their egoistic politicians must feel slighted for no one listening to their lofty, intellectual Nordic wisdom. Hence they use the Nobel Peace Prize as their only way to inject their politics onto the world stage.
Instead of calling it the the “Nobel Peace Prize”, they should change the name to the “Norwegian Politics Prize”, given the person who most reflects the political opinion of the Norwegian parliament.
albill on October 10, 2009 at 8:33 AM
Hope takes no daring — doing takes daring.
unclesmrgol on October 10, 2009 at 8:55 AM
Hey ACORN Head, I don’t want your change and I don’t want your hope
bluegrass on October 10, 2009 at 9:23 AM
Well, Obama handled the situation as well as he could. He was forced to disavow the award in a sense. I have yet to read a single editorial that actually manages to muster up a defense for the actions of the committee.
Bizarre is the word.
AnninCA on October 10, 2009 at 11:07 AM
Obama to supporters: I’m sharing this award with everyone who’s “dared to hope”
Makes me look like a little bit less of a jacka**
mad scientist on October 10, 2009 at 11:29 AM
IT’S A MADHOUSE!!!
Percy_Peabody on October 10, 2009 at 11:55 AM
What exactly is this “our standpoint” crap ??
This Nobel is for Obama, not the State Department.
How dare they usurp the adulation that rightly belongs only to “The Won”.
J_Crater on October 10, 2009 at 12:09 PM
How far have we sunk as a species when meaningless and mindless platitudes have such a powerful effect on us. At least it’s not just endemic to Americans. Norwegians are equally hopey-changey. I think we have the capacity to snap out of it. Norway…not so much.
SKYFOX on October 10, 2009 at 1:25 PM
If “Daring to Hope” gets us more Obama, then I am turning on the pessimism full blast.
Cybergeezer on October 10, 2009 at 1:48 PM
No hope for this dope.
I hope congess changes in 2010..
Now, gimme my Nobel Prize so I can share the wealth with me, myself and I.
dthorny on October 10, 2009 at 4:45 PM
dthorny on October 10, 2009 at 4:52 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »