WSJ: CIA knew of Qom site before 2007 NIE

posted at 10:55 am on October 8, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

In 2007, the CIA published the now-notorious National Intelligence Estimate that reversed its earlier position and claimed that Iran had stopped working on nuclear weapons after the exposure of its program and the AQ Khan network.  At the time, many accused the CIA of producing a political document rather than an honest assessment, attempting to derail George Bush’s efforts to rally other nations into tougher sanctions against the mullahs in Tehran.  Western allies such as Britain and Germany openly mocked the findings, but the CIA insisted that they had addressed all of their latest intelligence on the subject.

Today, the Wall Street Journal reports that the CIA knew of the secret uranium-enrichment facility in Qom when it wrote that NIE (via Instapundit):

When it comes to politicized intelligence in the Bush years, the critics may finally have a point. Perhaps the work of America’s intelligence agencies was manipulated to suit the convenience of a small group of willful officials, intent on getting their way against the better judgment of their colleagues.

Except the intelligence was about Iran, not Iraq, and the manipulators weren’t conniving neocons but rather the Administration’s internal critics on the left.

That’s one way to look at last month’s revelation that Iran is building a secret second site to enrich uranium, among other emerging intelligence details. The Qom site—too small for civilian purposes but ideal for producing weapons-grade uranium—is supervised by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards and was only declared to the International Atomic Energy Agency after Tehran got wind that the nuclear watchdogs knew about it.

But the more telling detail, as a recent White House “guidance paper” acknowledges, is that the U.S. has been “carefully observing and analyzing this facility for several years.” That timeline is significant, because it was less than two years ago, in December 2007, that a National Intelligence Estimate on Iran’s nuclear programs asserted with “high confidence” that Tehran had “halted its nuclear weapons program” in the fall of 2003.

This cannot be explained merely by incompetence.  The facility at Qom had not been declared by Iran as part of its “peaceful” nuclear program in 2007 when the NIE was written.  It is, as the Journal notes, too small for commercial purposes, but perfectly suited for military purposes, which is probably why the elite Revolutionary Guard secures it to this day.  No one with this information could possibly have concluded anything except that the Iranians had hidden its military applications of uranium enrichment in Qom.

As Glenn Reynolds says, the NIE has been exposed as an effort by a handful of people at the CIA to kneecap Bush on national security.  It deliberately misled Congress and the nation on the threat posed by Iran, a lie that has cost us valuable time in stopping the nuclear threat.  If Iran gets the bomb, we can thank Tom Fingar and his colleagues for distracting the US long enough to allow them to do so.

Congress needs to investigate what happened with the 2007 NIE and pursue this politicization of intelligence with the same fervor that they did with the Iraq War intel a few years ago.  In that case, our intel matched that of our allies, although they had different policies in how to handle Iraq.  In this case, we undermined ourselves and our allies and made the world a more dangerous place.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

MaximusConfessor on October 8, 2009 at 12:08 PM

It’s those damn jooooooooooos!!!

Go back to Ron Paul’s stormfront brigade.

jdkchem on October 8, 2009 at 1:08 PM

They(the Shia iranians)are NOT EVEN THE ISLAMIC TERRORISTS!

It is the SUNNI Wahabists(who hate the Shia and want to destroy them BTW)that are the terrorists!

MaximusConfessor on October 8, 2009 at 12:54 PM

You need to run to the “Iran supporting Taliban” thread and explain to everyone how the Shia Iranians would never support the Sunni Taliban. Hurry!

progressoverpeace on October 8, 2009 at 1:19 PM

You need to run to the “Iran supporting Taliban” thread and explain to everyone how the Shia Iranians would never support the Sunni Taliban. Hurry!

progressoverpeace on October 8, 2009 at 1:19 PM

He’s too busy talking with his friends Ayatollah Khamenei and President Ahmadinejad.

Loxodonta on October 8, 2009 at 1:25 PM

This post is already mentioned in the Wikipedia entry for Tom Fingar.

J_Crater on October 8, 2009 at 1:26 PM

You need to run to the “Iran supporting Taliban” thread and explain to everyone how the Shia Iranians would never support the Sunni Taliban. Hurry!

progressoverpeace on October 8, 2009 at 1:19 PM

In fairness, threats of death and dismemberment are pretty effective at overcoming minor religious differences.

Dark-Star on October 8, 2009 at 1:27 PM

Channeling Ed Morrissey

This happened way back in 2007, long before Barack Obama became President. This is unimportant. Let’s move on.

Basilsbest on October 8, 2009 at 12:09 PM

This post is already mentioned in the Wikipedia entry for Tom Fingar.

J_Crater on October 8, 2009 at 1:26 PM

Drats! Ed really blew his spiking of this story.

Try harder!

Loxodonta on October 8, 2009 at 1:34 PM

Add this one to Colin Powell lying to Bush about who outed Valerie Plame (Richard Armitage, his subordinate, who told Powell before he talked to Bush that it was him).

Despicable. Burn the guy. Both Fingar and Powell. The country was materially harmed by both.

Harry Schell on October 8, 2009 at 1:37 PM

Waterboard Fingar until he tells who the Dems in Congress were that connived with him on this treachery. Then shoot him.

Almost certainly Kennedy was involved, and Kerry. Dirty rotten bastards.

drunyan8315 on October 8, 2009 at 1:55 PM

Congress won’t investigate. This is treason, plain, pure, and simple. The American people need to keep the pressure on for an FBI investigation and prosecution to occur. An example needs to be made here. Last I heard, treason is still a hangin’ offense.

SteelGuy on October 8, 2009 at 2:09 PM

The idea that iran is totally comfortable using a nuke and being COMPLETELY DESTROYED is nonsense and propaganda.

The idea that Iranian terrorists are totally comfortable strapping bombs to their backs in order to kill civilians knowing they will be COMPLETELY DESTROYED on detonation is nonsense and propaganda.

You are a naive fool who couldn’t find a clue if you had a map and a GPS unit. I bet your solution to weekly anal rape sessions would be to simply bend over and relax so it doesn’t hurt as bad.

xblade on October 8, 2009 at 2:20 PM

unclesmrgol on October 8, 2009 at 1:03 PM

Your whole entire premise fails for two reasons. 1) Your logic already fails right off the bat. You can’t believe them when they say they have better centrifuges and then not believe them when they say that they don’t have a weapons program. 2) That would still make the facility smaller than Natanz.

Also I wasn’t saying it won’t be an enrichment facility I’m saying it is not yet an enrichment facility.

The Calibur on October 8, 2009 at 2:38 PM

ACORN is dead.

But what about Rangel?

AnninCA on October 8, 2009 at 2:55 PM

Congress needs to investigate what happened with the 2007 NIE and pursue this politicization of intelligence with the same fervor that they did with the Iraq War intel a few years ago.

The current congress benefitted from the NIE, by consolidating power in the 2008 elections. Now, who is going to investigate again?

Vashta.Nerada on October 8, 2009 at 4:21 PM

Panetta said that the CIA had known about the facility for at least three years.

J_Crater on October 8, 2009 at 5:34 PM

Comment pages: 1 2